1 After section 3
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Insert clause
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
note: Definition of commissioned police officer
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1)

11 Subsection 4(1) (definition of commissioned rank)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
note: Repeal definition of commissioned rank
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Defines Commissioner's Orders
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Subsection 4(1) (definition of maximum age)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Repeal definition of maximum age
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Definition of Australian Federal Police member
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner of Police.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Member is defined as...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an AFP employee in respect of whom a declaration under section 40B is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The definition includes...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Subsection 4(1)

15 Subsection 4(1) (definition of non-commissioned rank)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Repeal definition of non-commissioned rank
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Definition of overseas
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subsection 4(1)

17 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Defines prohibited drug
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on specified drugs
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines class of prohibited drug
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Subsection 4(1)

18 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Defines prohibited drug test
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on testing for prohibited drugs
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies drug test as a prohibited drug test
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Subsection 4(1)

19 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Definition of senior executive AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 4(1) (definition of adjustment payment)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.10
note: Definition of adjustment payment
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'adjustment payment'
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for adjustment payment
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1) (definition of adjustment payment)

20 Subsection 4(1) (definition of senior executive
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal definition of commissioned police officer
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Defines serious misconduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Subsection 4(1)

22 Subsection 4(1) (definition of special member)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Substitute section 40E for section 27.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Subsection 4(1) (definition of staff member)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal definition of staff member
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
has part: 23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-2
schema version: 2

23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer in respect of AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has rights, duties and powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner

23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Rights and duties of the Commissioner regarding AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties apply during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Rights and duties apply during employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties are recognized by AI.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Rights and duties are recognized by AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: in
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner has rights and duties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has rights and duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties diffuse to employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Rights and duties diffuse to employees.
modality: Diffusion
operator: in
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties are traceable to employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Rights and duties are traceable to employment.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: LegalPerson
part of: 23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner

24 After section 4
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Insert clause after section 4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
note: The Commissioner may engage persons as employees subject to conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage persons as employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees

24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
note: Conditions for engaging AFP employees
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to notify conditions for engaging AFP employees
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees

24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
note: Conditions for engagement of AFP employees may vary beyond those implied by subsection (2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (2) and variation in engagement conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit the conditions that may be applied to the engagement of an AFP employee

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of engagement conditions as varying beyond those implied by subsection (2)
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: Conditions for engagement are classified as varying beyond those implied by subsection (2)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitted variation in engagement conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit the conditions that may be applied to the engagement of an AFP employee

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (2) and variation in engagement conditions
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit the conditions that may be applied to the engagement of an AFP employee

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of classification of engagement conditions
modality: SHACL
operator: asserts
premise text: Conditions for engagement are classified as varying beyond those implied by subsection (2)

24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
note: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens as AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Commissioner's engagement period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Commissioner engages Australian citizens during this period.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens unless considered appropriate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional decision: Commissioner's judgment
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: Commissioner considers it appropriate to engage non-Australian citizens.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Commissioner must engage Australian citizens.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens unless considered appropriate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional diffusion: Commissioner's decision
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Commissioner considers it appropriate to engage non-Australian citizens.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval: Commissioner's engagement period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Commissioner engages Australian citizens during this period.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees

24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
note: Exemption from engagement for overseas duties
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts engagement for overseas duties
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion

25 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 25(2) Subsection 5(2)
has part: 25(3) Subsection 5(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

25 Senior executive AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
note: Commissioner may declare an AFP employee a senior executive AFP employee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may declare.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Senior executive AFP employees

25(2) Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Law provision refers to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Subsection 5(2)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (the provision of the law is to be read as referring to the member to whom the declaration applies.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Refers to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers-to
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25(2) Subsection 5(2)

25(3) Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: The Commissioner may declare a member's rank.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Subsection 5(2)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of rank is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

26 Part II (heading)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Continuous employment
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
note: Employment is taken to be continuous if engaged under section 24 for a period and re-engaged immediately after the end of that period.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuous employment implies obligation to provide continuous service
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Continuous employment

27 Division 1 of Part II (heading)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

27 Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27(1) Remuneration and other conditions
has part: 27(2) Remuneration and other conditions
has part: 27(3) Remuneration and other conditions
has part: 27(4) Remuneration and other conditions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2
schema version: 2

27(1) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
note: Determination of remuneration and terms for AFP employees
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulation of AFP employee employment
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(1) Remuneration and other conditions

27(2) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
note: May adopt or incorporate provisions of an award or certified agreement
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits adoption or incorporation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(2) Remuneration and other conditions

27(3) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
note: Overrules determination under subsection (1) to the extent of any inconsistency.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applies to temporal interval of subsection (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to knowledge graph of Australian workplace agreements
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits overriding a determination under subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Override
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to diffusion of Australian workplace agreements
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to recurring trace of Australian workplace agreements
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.

27(4) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
note: Award has the same meaning as in the Workplace Relations Act 1996.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Workplace Relations Act 1996.
modality: Deontic
operator: same-as

28 Section 6
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Termination of employment by Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
note: The Commissioner may terminate employment by notice in writing.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

29 Paragraph 9(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
note: Repeal and substitute paragraph 9(1)(a) with new powers and duties for constables.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Paragraph 9(1)(a)

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.10
note: Definition of AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)

30 Paragraph 9(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Repeal paragraph 9(1)(c) and substitute with new obligations.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 Resignation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(1) Resignation
has part: 30(2) Resignation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30(1) Resignation
type: Concept
description: Written notice of resignation and effective date
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
note: Employee must give written notice of resignation and specify the effective date.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Resignation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must give written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(1) Resignation

30(2) Resignation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
note: Cannot be earlier than 14 days or later than 4 months after notice is given to the Commissioner.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Resignation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval classification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval classification with cognitive AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be earlier than 14 days or later than 4 months after notice is given to the Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval classification with diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval classification with ordering
modality: LTL
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(2) Resignation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Paragraph 9(1)(c)

31 Paragraph 9(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Repeal and substitute a reference to an officer of police with a member of a particular rank.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
has part: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-2
schema version: 2

31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
note: Employee entitled to retire upon notice
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has obligation to retire
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
note: Minimum retiring age is 55 years, or as prescribed by regulations.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines minimum retiring age
modality: Deontic
operator: =

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Paragraph 9(2)(b)

32 After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(2A) After subsection 9(2)
has part: 32(2B) After subsection 9(2)
has part: 32(2C) After subsection 9(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Commissioner may retire employee by notice if employee consents.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to retire
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Employee may consent to retirement under subsection (1)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
description: Commissioner's certification
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Certification of incapacity is required for retirement on invalidity grounds.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken, for the purposes of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 and the Superannuation Act, to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for retirement on invalidity grounds
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and (b) the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period); and (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner certifies in writing that the person’s physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not so re-engaged.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the condition for retirement on invalidity grounds
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and (b) the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period); and (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner's certification is required for retirement on invalidity grounds.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner certifies in writing that the person’s physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not so re-engaged.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the initial period and the certification of incapacity
modality: LTL
operator: <>
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and (b) the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period); and (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Commonwealth Superannuation Board of Trustees No. 2 must give a certificate under section 54C of the Superannuation Act 1976 for an AFP employee to be retired on invalidity grounds.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Age greater than or equal to maximum retiring age
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Maximum retiring age within the meaning of the Superannuation Act 1976
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Superannuation Act 1990

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificate under section 54C must be given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 54C of the Superannuation Act 1976

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificate under section 54C must be given for retirement on invalidity grounds
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Not capable of being retired on the ground of invalidity unless a certificate is given
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Part IVA of the Superannuation Act 1976

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificate under section 54C must be given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certificate under section 54C must be given for an AFP employee to be retired on invalidity grounds
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 32(4) of the Superannuation Act 1990

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: AFP employee must provide a certificate from the Commonwealth Superannuation Board of Trustees No. 1 to be retired on invalidity grounds.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(2A) After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Declares a member's rank for purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 32 After subsection 9(2)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for rank declaration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: define interval
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a member is of a particular rank for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifies the declaration of a rank obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: justify
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Infers the implications of rank declaration
modality: CogAI
operator: infer
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a member is of a particular rank for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declares a rank obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagates the declaration of a rank obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: propagate
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...

32(2B) After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Commissioner may declare member's rank for purposes of subsections.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 32 After subsection 9(2)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2B) Commissioner may declare member's rank.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner declares rank.
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
premise text: (2A) declaration is in force under subsection (2A)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(2B) After subsection 9(2)

32(2C) After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Ceases to be in force when the declaration under subsection (2A) ceases to be in force.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 32 After subsection 9(2)

33 Section 12
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
note: Omit specific language from a provision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2
schema version: 2

33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
note: Employee's retirement takes effect on the specified day after notice is given.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Retirement takes effect on specified day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee's retirement obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Employee has consented to retirement

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
description: Notice informing employee of right to apply for review of Commissioner's decision
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
note: Employee must be informed of right to review retirement decision within a specified period.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must be informed
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
note: Regulations regarding the timing of retirement on invalidity grounds
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
note: Regulations may make provision for review of decisions to retire AFP employees under subsection 32(1)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
note: Regulations may make provision for giving written reasons and a copy of those reasons to the AFP employee concerned.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

34 Paragraph 12(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
note: Omit specific language from text.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
has part: 34(2) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
has part: 34(3) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

34(1) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24
note: Employee must retire voluntarily if resigning between ages 55 and 60.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Resignation must occur between ages 55 and 60.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (b) the resignation takes effect on or after the day on which he or she reaches 55 but before he or she reaches 60;

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Resignation implies voluntary retirement.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (b) the resignation takes effect on or after the day on which he or she reaches 55 but before he or she reaches 60;

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must retire voluntarily.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State permits voluntary retirement between ages 55 and 60.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) If...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Resignation must occur before reaching age 60.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the resignation takes effect on or after the day on which he or she reaches 55 but before he or she reaches 60;

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(1) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act

34(2) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24
note: Employee must retire voluntarily if terminated between ages 55 and 60.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between ages 55 and 60
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) If...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of retirement as voluntary using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (2) If...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to retire voluntarily
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional relationship between employment termination and retirement
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF-THEN
premise text: (2) If...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between ages 55 and 60
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) If...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(2) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act

34(3) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24
note: Voluntary retirement condition
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 60
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: 55

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(3) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, or AFP employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified language.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘a member or staff member’.

35 Paragraph 12E(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
note: Omit 'a staff member', substitute 'an AFP employee who is not a member'.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Commissioner may engage consultants or independent contractors.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-35-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-2
schema version: 2

36 Paragraph 12E(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
note: Substitute employees in a specific context
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(5) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Oath or affirmation required for Deputy Commissioner before commencing duties
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take oath or affirmation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Deputy Commissioner must enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation upon appointment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation after declaration as a member.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enter into undertaking and make oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation upon appointment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enter into undertaking and make oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

36(5) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Prohibition on re-appointment for a term immediately after the end of the previous appointment's term.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between appointments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Disjoint
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits re-appointment for a specific term.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits re-appointment to prevent overlap with previous appointments
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of 're-appoint'
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Paragraph 12E(1)(b)

37 Subsection 12E(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
note: Omit 'a staff member', substitute 'an AFP employee'.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

37 General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) General administration and control
has part: 37(2) General administration and control
has part: 37(3) General administration and control
has part: 37(4) General administration and control
has part: 37(5) General administration and control
has part: 37(6) General administration and control
has part: 37(7) General administration and control
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2
schema version: 2

37(1) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: The Commissioner has the general administration of, and the control of the operations of, the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to administer and control the Australian Federal Police.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) General administration and control

37(2) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Commissioner regarding general policy.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

37(3) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Commissioner regarding common services.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister may give written directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

37(4) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Must comply with directions given under this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

37(5) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: The Minister may make an arrangement with the appropriate Minister of a State for the provision or development of common services.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make an arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: may

37(6) General administration and control
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Reports to be provided by the Commissioner to the Minister
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

37(7) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Definition of common services and Secretary
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Secretary means the Secretary to the Department
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: common services includes services consisting of, or provided by means of...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (7) In this section:

38 Part III
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
note: Repeal Part III
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.27
note: The Commissioner may issue orders with respect to the general administration of, and the control of the operations of, the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue orders
modality: Deontic
operator: may

39 Part IV (heading)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
note: Repeal and substitute heading of Australian Federal Police Act 1979 Schedule 1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: Compliance with Commissioner's Orders is mandatory.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders

3A Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3A(1) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(2) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(3) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(4) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(5) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(6) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(7) Overview of Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a
schema version: 2

3A(1) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

3A(2) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners are appointed by the Governor-General.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners are appointed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Appoints
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners are appointed by the Governor-General.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(2) Overview of Act

3A(3) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: The Commissioner may engage persons as AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(3) Overview of Act

3A(4) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Members of the Australian Federal Police are members of the AFP.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They are members of the AFP.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership is a property.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: The Commissioner and any Deputy Commissioner are members of the Australian Federal Police.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(4) Overview of Act

3A(5) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Commissioner may appoint special members to assist the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(5) Overview of Act

3A(6) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: The Commissioner has the general administration of and control of the operations of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to administer and control the operations of the Australian Federal Police.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(6) Overview of Act

3A(7) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Overview of Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of appoint)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.10
note: Repeal definition of appoint
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Subsection 17(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Substitute "one or more Deputy Commissioners" for "a Deputy Commissioner"
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: Do not disobey or fail to carry out lawful directions, instructions, or orders.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between lawful directions, instructions, and orders.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: An AFP employee or special member must not disobey or fail to carry out a lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Do not disobey or fail to carry out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disobedience and non-compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Lawful direction, instruction, or order given by the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Do not disobey or fail to carry out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disobedience and non-compliance under supervision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Lawful direction, instruction, or order given by the AFP employee or special member under whose control, direction, or supervision they perform their duties.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders is diffused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: An AFP employee or special member must not disobey or fail to carry out a lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders is recurring.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: An AFP employee or special member must not disobey or fail to carry out a lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Subsection 17(1)

40A Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40A(1) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(2) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(3) Self-incrimination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a
schema version: 2

40A(1) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: AFP employee or special member must provide information under section 39 or 40.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(1) Self-incrimination

40A(2) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: Employee's self-incrimination information is not admissible in evidence against them, except for disciplinary proceedings.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State must not use self-incrimination information against employees in disciplinary proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to not use self-incrimination information against employees in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The State is required to protect employee rights.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employees may refuse self-incrimination information in disciplinary proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to employees to refuse self-incrimination information in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Employees have the right to refuse self-incrimination information.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State may not use self-incrimination information against employees in disciplinary proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of self-incrimination information against employees in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The State must not use self-incrimination information against employees.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employees are entitled to refuse self-incrimination information in disciplinary proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Creates a right for employees to refuse self-incrimination information in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: Employees have the right to refuse self-incrimination information.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State must protect employee rights.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a duty on the State to protect employee rights.
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
premise text: The State has a responsibility to protect employees.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(2) Self-incrimination

40A(3) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: No self-incrimination for testing purposes
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits self-incrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligation to provide relevant information for testing
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(3) Self-incrimination

40B AFP employees who are members of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Declaration of AFP employee membership
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40b
schema version: 2

40C Determination of competency or qualification requirements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Commissioner may specify competency and qualification requirements by written determination.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40c
schema version: 2

40D Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(2) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(3) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(5) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d
schema version: 2

40D(1) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: The Governor-General may declare a member to be a commissioned police officer.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of commission is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers

40D(2) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Recommendation from Commissioner required before declaring a member as a commissioned police officer.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recommendation is necessary for the declaration to occur during this time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The recommendation from Commissioner must be received before the Governor-General makes a declaration.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recommendation from Commissioner is necessary for the declaration to occur.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes a requirement or condition
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation from Commissioner is provided.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recommendation from Commissioner must be processed by AI for the declaration to occur.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a requirement or condition
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation from Commissioner is provided.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation is provided.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires recommendation from Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: The Minister must have received a recommendation.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recommendation from Commissioner must be disseminated to others for the declaration to occur.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a requirement or condition
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation from Commissioner is provided.

40D(3) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: The Commissioner must recommend a member for commission only if they are competent and qualified.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The recommendation must be made at least when the member meets the qualifications.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The recommendation is related to the qualifications of the member.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to recommend members for commission.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The recommendation is conditional on the Commissioner's satisfaction.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The recommendation must be made at least when the member meets the qualifications.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...

40D(4) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Commissioner may declare a member commissioned police officer upon authorization.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authorization must be prior to declaration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Declaration implies authorization.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Declaration is a type of authorization.
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Authorization is necessary for declaration.
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers

40D(5) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner must declare a member competent and qualified to be a commissioned police officer.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration is obligatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40D(5) Commissioned police officers

40D(6) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Governor-General's power not limited by authorisation
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the Governor-General's power
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
premise text: (1)

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers

40E Special members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40E(1) Special members
has part: 40E(2) Special members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40e
schema version: 2

40E(1) Special members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Commissioner may appoint a person as a special member of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Special members

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may appoint a person.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

40E(2) Special members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Special members have powers and duties during appointment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Special members

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possession of powers and duties
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40E(2) Special members

40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f
schema version: 2

40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Consultation required before terminating a secondment
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may at any time terminate a secondment...

40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Guidelines for secondment of AFP employees to foreign countries or other bodies
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Minister must consult Commissioner about guidelines before giving them.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before giving them to the Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The Minister must...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Cannot arrange for AFP employee to be seconded outside Australia without guidelines.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g
schema version: 2

40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31
note: Continues discipline obligations etc.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31
note: Remains subject to same obligations and liabilities in relation to discipline
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Remains subject to same obligations and liabilities in relation to discipline
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31
note: Rights and powers of an AFP employee unaffected by secondment
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...rights, powers or immunities...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to relinquish rights and powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Nothing in this section affects...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or liabilities in relation to discipline...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No prohibition on exercising rights and powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Nothing in this section affects...

40H Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h
schema version: 2

40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32
note: Determination of duties and places for AFP employees
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assigns duties to AFP employees
modality: Deontic
operator: determines

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.

40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32
note: Duties to meet special operational needs
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.

40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32
note: Commissioner may determine accommodation arrangements for employee performing special operational duties.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine accommodation arrangements.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

40J Suspension from duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
note: Suspension from duties of AFP employees may be provided.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40j
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suspend duties
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40J Suspension from duties etc.

40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k
schema version: 2

40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
note: Termination of employment for serious misconduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct

40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
description: Copy of declaration to AFP employee
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
note: Declaration must be made within 24 hours of decision to terminate employment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration must be made within 24 hours
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Commissioner must give copy of declaration to AFP employee
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGES

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct

40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
note: Definition of serious misconduct for termination of employment
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with legal implications
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct

40L Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40L(1) Financial statements
has part: 40L(2) Financial statements
has part: 40L(3) Financial statements
has part: 40L(4) Financial statements
has part: 40L(5) Financial statements
has part: 40L(6) Financial statements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l
schema version: 2

40L(1) Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
note: The Commissioner may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to provide a statement.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner may give a direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(1) Financial statements

40L(2) Financial statements
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
note: Financial statements must be provided in a specified form and manner, with accompanying documents.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide financial statements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(2) Financial statements

40L(3) Financial statements
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
note: Must provide financial statement within 2 months
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide financial statement within 2 months
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(3) Financial statements

40L(4) Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
note: Commissioner may grant extension of time for giving statement in special circumstances.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may grant extension of time
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(4) Financial statements

40L(5) Financial statements
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
note: Must provide financial statement despite potential incrimination or penalty
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide financial statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(5) Financial statements

40L(6) Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
note: No admissible in evidence against person in proceedings for disciplinary offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits admissible evidence in certain proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits admissible evidence for certain purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on persons to follow provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants right to persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(6) Financial statements

40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40M(1) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
has part: 40M(2) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
has part: 40M(3) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m
schema version: 2

40M(1) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35
note: A person authorized may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to undergo a breath test or provide a body sample for a prohibited drug test.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the person to provide a breath test or body sample
modality: Deontic
operator: require

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40M(1) General testing of AFP employees or special members for

40M(2) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35
note: Provide blood sample if breath test indicates alcohol presence
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to provide blood sample
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

40M(3) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35
note: Must comply with direction given under this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40M(3) General testing of AFP employees or special members for

40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40N(1) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(2) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(3) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(4) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(5) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n
schema version: 2

40N(1) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: A person authorized may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to undergo a breath test or provide a body sample for a prohibited drug test.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May give direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40N(1) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

40N(2) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: A person authorized may give a member or special member a written direction requiring them to undergo a breath test or provide a body sample for a prohibited drug test.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Written direction given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization to give direction
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Person authorized

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40N(2) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

40N(3) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Must provide direction by authorized person after incident.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40N(3) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

40N(4) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Require AFP employee or special member to provide blood sample for test.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40N(4) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

40N(5) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Must comply with a direction given under this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Given direction

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance justified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of direction
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
premise text: Employee or member knows direction

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40N(5) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and

40P Regulations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.38
note: Regulations may make provision in relation to the authorisation of persons to give directions under sections 40M and 40N.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40p-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40p
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation of persons to give directions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

40Q Admissibility of test results etc. in legal proceedings
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.38
note: Exemptions from admissibility in certain proceedings
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40q-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40q
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40Q Admissibility of test results etc. in legal proceedings

41 Subsections 17(5) and (6)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

41A Old law members or staff members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
note: Definition of old law member or staff member
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of old law member or staff member
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41A Old law members or staff members

42 Subsection 18(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Omit specific action under subsection 25(1A)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

43 Subsection 19(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Omit specific action under subsection 25(1A)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Subsection 20(2B)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal subsection 20(2B)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

45 Divisions 2 and 3 of Part IV
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal Divisions, substitute
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 Part V
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Repeal Part and substitute with new provision
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

47 Section 41
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
note: Defines 'changeover day' as the commencement date of Schedule 1 to the Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1999.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 Section 41 (definition of corruption offence)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
note: Definition of corruption offence
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Section 41 (definition of corruption offence)

49 Section 41 (paragraph (a) of the definition of corruption
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
note: Omit 'office as such a member or staff member, as the case may be', substitute 'office as such a person'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting and substituting
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on specified drugs
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
note: Australian workplace agreement has the same meaning as in the Workplace Relations Act 1996.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of Australian workplace agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: =

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)

50 Section 41 (paragraph (b) of the definition of corruption
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
note: Substitute “such a person” for “such a member or staff member” in the definition of corruption offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces a placeholder with a specific value.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50 Section 41 (paragraph (b) of the definition of corruption

51 Section 41
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
note: Amendment of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

52 After section 41
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
note: Insert clause after section 41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 52(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

52(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Suspension without pay for AFP employees charged with disciplinary offenses
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Suspension without pay
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

52(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Person cannot pay employee contributions under a superannuation scheme after cessation day.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for paying employee contributions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implicates that paying employee contributions is not allowed after cessation day
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies entities as persons who must not pay employee contributions
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Classification
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits paying employee contributions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads prohibition to all persons affected by subsection (1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

52(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Person ceases to be an AFP employee under certain circumstances.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

52(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Person ceases to be an AFP employee under certain conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

52(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Clarifies cessation of AFP employee status
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

53 Paragraph 43(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with charging certain individuals with an offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-53-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits charging certain individuals with an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

54 Paragraph 44(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
note: Conviction of certain individuals is an obligation.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Paragraph 44(a)

55 Subsection 47(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
note: Omit 'a member or a staff member of the Australian Federal Police' and substitute 'an AFP employee'.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 Subsection 47(3)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

57 Paragraph 47(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute specific conditions for AFP employees and old law members.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to repeal and substitute specific conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Paragraph 47(3)(a)

58 Paragraph 47(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
note: Omit “would,”, substitute “who would,”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

59 Subsection 47(3)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
note: Substitution of terms in subsection 47(3)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Subsection 47(3)

6 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
note: Defines blood test as a test to determine alcohol levels in a person's blood.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

60 Subsection 48(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
note: Repeals outdated appointment clause
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause repealed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legislative repeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
premise text: Obligation to follow outdated clause

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Subsection 48(1)

61 Subsection 49(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
note: Substitute 'if a person who is an AFP employee' for 'where a member or staff member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute 'if a person who is an AFP employee'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces placeholder with specific term
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
premise text: Omit 'where a member or staff member'

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61 Subsection 49(1)

62 Paragraph 49(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
note: Replace 'member or staff member' with 'person'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

63 Paragraph 49(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
note: Omit specific words from text
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-63-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text must not omit the words
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of words
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omitting words is prohibited

64 Paragraphs 51(1)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
note: Cease being an AFP employee upon charge or retirement.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cease being an AFP employee upon charge or retirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Paragraphs 51(1)(b) and (c)

65 Paragraph 51(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Omit specific phrase from text
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-65-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

66 At the end of section 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Avoids cessation of AFP employee status after initial engagement period
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-66-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 At the end of section 51

67 Section 52
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

68 Section 60
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.43
note: Repeal section 60
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(5) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2
schema version: 2

68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
description: Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
note: Certification of appointment and status of member
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has been appointed as a Deputy Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: The Commissioner may certify...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
description: (a), (b), (c), or (d)
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
note: Certification of member's appointment and status
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
note: Certification of special member appointment details
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
description: Conclusive evidence of certificate under this section
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
note: Commissioner must certify a person's membership status.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has an obligation to certify a person's membership status.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

68(5) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
note: Presumption of certificate validity
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Matters stated in the certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presumes document to be valid
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate

69 Subsection 60A(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.43
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new definition for certain individuals.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.47
note: Must do without patronage or favouritism when engaging AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Subsection 60A(1)

69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a
schema version: 2

69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
note: The Commissioner may engage persons overseas as employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage persons overseas
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees

69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has the right to act as an employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees

69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
note: Commissioner's power to engage persons overseas is not limited by this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner's power is not limited
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees

69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69B(1) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
has part: 69B(2) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
has part: 69B(3) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b
schema version: 2

69B(1) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
note: Exemptions from Workplace Relations Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69B(1) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act

69B(2) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
note: The Workplace Relations Act 1996 does not apply to the termination of employment of AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69B(2) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act

69B(3) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
note: Exemptions from Workplace Relations Act 1996
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative scope of application
modality: Deontic
operator: ~
premise text: (a) that is not mentioned in this section; and (b) to which the Workplace Relations Act 1996 would not otherwise apply.

69C Delegation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
note: Delegation of powers, functions or duties to a Deputy Commissioner, AFP employee or special member.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69c-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69c
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69c-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
has part: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69d
schema version: 2

69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: The Commissioner may arrange for a person to assist the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police

69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Terms and conditions for persons assisting the Australian Federal Police must be specified in an agreement.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Australian Federal Police to specify terms and conditions in an agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
note: Defines body sample as human biological fluid, tissue, or breath
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a standard for what constitutes a body sample
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies body sample into specific categories
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

70 Subsection 61(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Omit specific terms from a provision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-70-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specific terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

71 Subsection 62(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Omit specific phrase from text
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit specific phrase from text
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

72 Subsection 62(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Repeal penalty, substitute imprisonment for 12 months.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

73 Subsection 62(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Repeal subsection 62(2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

74 Section 63
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Insert 'or special member' after 'member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of 'or special member'
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Section 63

75 Section 63 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Repeal penalty, substitute imprisonment for 12 months.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-75-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

76 Subsection 64(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-76-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Subsection 64(1)

77 Subsection 64(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Insert “or special member” after “member”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a term
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77 Subsection 64(2)

78 Subsection 64A(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
note: Must hold a rank declared by regulations to be applicable.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78 Subsection 64A(1)

79 Subsection 64A(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
note: Omit $500, substitute 5 penalty units
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-79-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
note: Defines breath test as a test to determine alcohol in blood
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to definition of breath test
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to

80 Subsection 64AA(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
note: Modify suspension rules for AFP employees
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New text
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Change the wording of a provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Modification
premise text: Original text

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80 Subsection 64AA(1)

81 Subsection 64AA(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-81-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
schema version: 2

82 Paragraph 64B(5)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
note: Omit specified phrase from text.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-82-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

83 Subsection 66(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
note: Omit specific language from existing provision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-83-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
schema version: 2

84 Subsection 66(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
note: Omit specific language from subsection 66(2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-84-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
schema version: 2

85 Section 68
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
note: Repeal section and substitute with Schedule 1 amendment of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-85-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
schema version: 2

86 Paragraph 70(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Insert “or special member” after “member”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of 'or special member'
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86 Paragraph 70(a)

87 At the end of paragraph 70(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Add “and”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Add ‘and’.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to add ‘and’
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: None

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87 At the end of paragraph 70(a)

88 Paragraph 70(aa)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Insert 'or special member' after 'member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of 'or special member'
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88 Paragraph 70(aa)

89 At the end of paragraph 70(aa)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Add “and”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State must add “and”.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89 At the end of paragraph 70(aa)

9 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
note: Definition of certified agreement
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: certified agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Act 1996

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Subsection 4(1)

90 Paragraph 70(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Omit '$500', substitute '5 penalty units'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-90-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
schema version: 2

91 At the end of paragraph 70(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Add “and”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to add ‘and’.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91 At the end of paragraph 70(b)

92 At the end of section 70
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
note: Requiring AFP employees to make and subscribe oaths or affirmations of secrecy.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make and subscribe oaths or affirmations of secrecy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make deductions from salary to satisfy judgment debt.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92 At the end of section 70

93 Sections 72 and 73
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
note: Repeal sections
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-93-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
schema version: 2

94 Section 76
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
note: Repeal section 76
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-94-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
schema version: 2

95 Section 77
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
note: Insertion of section reference after section 72
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-95-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
schema version: 2

96 Sections 78 and 79
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
note: Repeal sections 78 and 79
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-96-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
schema version: 2

1 Paragraphs (z) and (za) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal paragraphs of Schedule 2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits actions under section 28, 40F or 40H of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 and Archives Act 1983
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals paragraphs of Schedule 2
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

10 Subsection 6B(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Omit 'a senior member', substitute 'an authorised member'.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘an authorised member’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'a senior member'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘a senior member’

11 Subsection 6B(7)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Defines authorised member for purposes of subsection (1)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorised member is defined
modality: Deontic
operator: is

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Subsection 6B(7)

12 Subsection 21(5)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Omit 'General Orders and General Instructions', substitute 'Commissioner's Orders'.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Subsection 52B(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Omit specific action from AFP appointees
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reducing an AFP appointee to a lower rank or level
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

14 Paragraph 52B(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Omit specific phrase from paragraph.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reducing appointee to lower rank.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15 Subsection 53(3)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reducing an AFP appointee to a lower rank or level.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16 Subsection 67(7)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Omit specific phrase from Crimes Act 1914
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reducing appointee to lower rank
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

17 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Assistant Commissioner)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Repeal definition of Assistant Commissioner
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with new definition
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of the repealed paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of

19 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of law
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with a new definition
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of law

2 Subparagraph 47(2)(a)(iiia)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with a new definition.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subparagraph 47(2)(a)(iiia)

20 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
note: Defines senior executive AFP employee term
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Subsection 3(1)

21 Paragraph 15J(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
note: Authorise senior executive AFP employee to perform specific task
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Perform task
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: Senior executive AFP employee

22 Subsection 15R(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
note: Omit 'an Assistant Commissioner', substitute 'a senior executive AFP employee authorised in writing under section 15J'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Paragraph 15S(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
note: Omit 'an Assistant Commissioner', substitute 'a senior executive AFP employee authorised in writing under section 15J'.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-23-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an Assistant Commissioner'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

24 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
note: Repeal of paragraph (b) of the definition of authorized person
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-24-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of a specific action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

25 Subsection 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
note: Definition of AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Subsection 2(1)

26 Subsection 7(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
note: Substitute 'an AFP employee' for 'a member or staff member of the AFP'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Subsection 7(1)

27 Section 13
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
note: Omit certain individuals from the definition of Australian Federal Police employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain individuals from being considered Australian Federal Police employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

28 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (g) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
note: Repeal of paragraph (g) and substitution with new definition
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of the old paragraph (g)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (g) of the definition of

29 Subsection 171(3) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
note: Repeal paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised person.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not an authorised person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits AFP employees and special members from being authorised persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: AFP employee or special member within the meaning of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Subsection 171(3) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition

3 Paragraph 23(d)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
note: Replace paragraph with a new definition of the Australian Federal Police
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing text with new text
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Paragraph 23(d)

30 Subsection 180(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
note: Omit specific term from Australian Federal Police Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting term
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Subsection 180(1)

31 Part 1 of the Dictionary (definition of member of the
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal the definition of Australian Federal Police
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Part 1 of the Dictionary (definition of member of the

32 Part 1 of the Dictionary (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
note: Insert 'or special member' after 'member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Part 1 of the Dictionary (paragraph (a) of the definition of

33 Subsection 10(2A)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
note: Employment in Government Service
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employment obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes to be employed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 Subsection 10(2A)

34 Subparagraph 85(2)(k)(i)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with a new definition.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Subparagraph 85(2)(k)(i)

35 Subsection 143(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
note: Omit outdated police rank from legislation.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits a specific action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 Subsection 143(2)

36 Subsection 8(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
note: Definition of AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Subsection 8(2)

37 Subsection 8(2) (definition of dangerous operation)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
note: Omit “a member”, substitute “the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, a Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, or an AFP employee”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-37-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with approved terminology
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated terminology
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘a member’

38 Subsection 8(2) (definition of member)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal the definition.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
schema version: 2

39 Subsection 8(2) (definition of unauthorised person)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
note: Definition of unauthorized person
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitutes 'an AFP employee'
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'a member'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Definition of unauthorized person

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 Subsection 8(2) (definition of unauthorised person)

4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of AFP appointee)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
note: Definition of AFP appointee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFP appointee means a Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, an AFP employee or a special member of the Australian Federal Police (all within the meaning of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of AFP appointee)

40 Paragraph 9(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
note: Replace the paragraph with a new obligation regarding the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Paragraph 9(2)(a)

41 Subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
note: Omit certain language from the Australian Federal Police or Defence Force
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain language
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Subsection 9(2)

42 Subsection 6(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with new definition of Commonwealth officer
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Subsection 6(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of

43 Paragraph 8(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
note: Treat certain actions as done or disclosed by the Australian Federal Police
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-43-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Australian Federal Police
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

44 Paragraph 9(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
note: Substitute a Deputy Commissioner or AFP employee with the same meaning as the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace a person with another
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44 Paragraph 9(2)(b)

45 Paragraph 10(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
note: Repeal and substitute a provision with an obligation to perform duties as specified.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 Paragraph 10(2)(b)

46 Paragraph 11(2)(c)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with provision for AFP employees and special members.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals paragraph, imposes obligation on AFP employees and special members.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Paragraph 11(2)(c)

47 Paragraph 87(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal and substitute a specific employment option.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-47-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits service as a Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police or employment as an AFP employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

48 Paragraph 87J(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal and substitute certain employment terms.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Paragraph 87J(2)(b)

49 Section 5 (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal and substitute a definition related to the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49 Section 5 (paragraph (d) of the definition of

5 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Definition of Commissioner's Orders
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 3(1)

50 Paragraph 5(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
note: Replace Commissioner of Australian Federal Police with Deputy Commissioner or AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Replaces

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50 Paragraph 5(2)(a)

51 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
note: Omit certain language from a provision
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain language
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51 Subsection 5(2)

52 Subsection 3(1) (definition of member)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal the definition.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
schema version: 2

53 Paragraph 82(3)(c)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Paragraph 82(3)(c)

54 Paragraph 84(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Paragraph 84(5)(b)

55 Subparagraph 84(6)(b)(iii)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 Subsection 3(5A)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
note: Replace 'member or staff member of the Australian Federal Police' with 'AFP employee'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56 Subsection 3(5A)

57 Section 10
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
note: Replace 'a member, or staff member' with 'an AFP employee'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Section 10

58 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
note: Definition of AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58 Subsection 5(1)

59 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
note: Authorisation required for senior executive AFP employee to perform duties
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorisation is valid within this time frame
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Authorisation is valid during this period

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Senior executive AFP employee can perform duties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Senior executive AFP employee has permission to perform duties
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: Senior executive AFP employee is authorised in writing by the Commissioner of Police

6 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal police officer)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Definition of Federal police officer
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal police officer)

60 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (b)(iia) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with a new provision related to the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal a subparagraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (b)(iia) of the definition of

61 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
note: Defines a term for senior executive AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-61-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

62 Subsection 5(1) (definition of staff member)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
note: Definition of staff member for Australian Federal Police
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Subsection 5(1) (definition of staff member)

63 Subsection 6N(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Omit staff members of the Australian Federal Police, substitute AFP employees who are not members of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-63-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

64 Paragraph 47(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Omit certain titles from witnesses in the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain titles.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Paragraph 47(b)

65 Section 3
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Definition of AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65 Section 3

66 Section 3 (definition of designated position)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Definition of designated position
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-66-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Section 3 (definition of designated position)

67 Section 3 (definition of staff member)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal definition of staff member
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
schema version: 2

68 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Substitute “persons” for “members and staff members”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Subsection 4(1)

69 Subsection 9(3)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
schema version: 2

7 Subsection 6(5) (definition of authorised appointee)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Definition of authorised appointee modified to use 'Commissioner's Orders' instead of 'General Orders or General Instructions'.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

70 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
note: Substitute ‘persons’ for ‘members or staff members’.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70 Subsection 12(1)

71 Subsection 13(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Omit specified terms from text.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-71-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

72 Paragraph 13(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Replace 'members or staff members' with 'persons'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to replace
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace words
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
premise text: Replace 'members or staff members' with 'persons'

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 Paragraph 13(2)(b)

73 Paragraph 20(f)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Omit specific language from text
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
schema version: 2

74 Paragraph 22(2)(c)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Omit specific language from a provision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-74-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

75 Subsection 25(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Substitute “a person” for “a member or a staff member”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-75-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75 Subsection 25(1)

76 Subsection 25(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Substitute “A person” for “A member or a staff member”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Subsection 25(2)

77 Subsection 25(2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Substitute “person” for “member or staff member”.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-77-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77 Subsection 25(2)

78 Subsection 26(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Omit specific terms from a provision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-78-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specific terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

79 Subsection 4(10)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal subsection and amend other Acts
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-79-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 6(5) (definition of General Instructions)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal the definition of General Instructions
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

80 At the end of section 4
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.65
note: Section 69B exemption from this Act applies to AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 69B exemption from this Act applies to AFP employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80 At the end of section 4

81 Paragraph 5(3)(e)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.65
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-81-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

82 Clause 3 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.65
note: Repeal clause in Schedule 1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-82-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 6(5) (definition of General Orders)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal the definition of General Orders
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Definitions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.66
note: Definitions for transitional provisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Certificates under subsection 12A(4) of the Australian
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.72
note: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 apply retroactively.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before the commencing time.
modality: Deontic
operator: retroactive application
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
modality: Diffusion
operator: information flow
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979

11 Repeal of subsection 20(2B) of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.72
note: Repeal of subsection 20(2B) does not affect the application of subsection 33(3)
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal overlaps with existing instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Repeal overlaps with existing instrument
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal implies no change to application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Repeal implies no change to application
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal inferences about application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Repeal inferences about application
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal does not affect application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal does not negate obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal diffuses to existing instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Repeal diffuses to existing instrument
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments

12 Repeal of section 39E of the Australian Federal Police Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
note: Repeal of section 39E does not affect operation of Superannuation Acts
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Continuation of section 49 of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
note: Continuation of section 49 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Continuation of section 49 of the Australian Federal Police

14 Continuation of section 51 of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
note: Applicability of amendments to persons charged with offences
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amendments apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply to persons charged with offences
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Persons charged with offences

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Continuation of section 51 of the Australian Federal Police

15 Continuation of section 52 of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
note: Continuation of section 52 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Continuation of secrecy obligations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
note: Continuation of secrecy obligations
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 Certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.74
note: Certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 apply retroactively.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are applicable both before and after the commencing time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68 before and after the commencing time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are applicable by the Australian Federal Police.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68 by the Australian Federal Police.
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 apply retroactively.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68.
modality: Deontic
operator: retroactive application
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are part of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applicable to certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
modality: Diffusion
operator: information dissemination
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 as in force at and after the commencing time applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are applicable at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68 at any time.
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal

18 References in statutory instruments to “staff member”
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.74
note: References to staff member are taken to be references to AFP employee who is not a member.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer to AFP employee
modality: Deontic
operator: >

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 References in statutory instruments to “staff member”

19 Regulations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.74
note: Regulations may be made in relation to the continuation of processes and suspensions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Conversion of former members and staff members etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.67
note: Conversion of former members and staff members etc.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Definition
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
note: Defines 'commencing time'
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Amendment of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
note: Amendment of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Amendments of the Complaints (Australian Federal
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
note: Amendments apply to action taken by AFP appointee at or after commencing time
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Amendment of the Crimes Act 1914
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
note: Amends section 15U of the Crimes Act 1914 regarding certificates.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: before/after
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for certificates
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: commencing time

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: same application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies certificates
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: former and later certificates

24 Amendment of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.77
note: Amendment of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Amendments of the Evidence Act 1995
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.77
note: Amendments of the Evidence Act 1995
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Amendment of the Long Service Leave (Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.78
note: Amendment of section 10 of the Long Service Leave (Commonwealth Employees) Act 1976 does not affect its operation.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 Amendment of the Migration Act 1958
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.78
note: Amendment of the Migration Act 1958
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Amendment of the Occupational Health and Safety
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.79
note: Amendment of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1991 applies to certain persons
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Amendment of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.79
note: Continuation of Act in relation to things done before the commencing time
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuation of Act
modality: Deontic
operator: continues

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Amendment of the Privacy Act 1988

3 Classification as senior executive AFP employee
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.69
note: Classification as senior executive AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Amendment of the Radiocommunications Act 1992
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.80
note: Applicability of Radiocommunications Act 1992 to certificates issued under section 305
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between certificates issued before and after the commencing time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: ...at any time before the commencing time by a member or special member...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of the Act to certificates issued under section 305
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: The Radiocommunications Act 1992 as in force at and after the commencing time applies...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate issued under section 305 at any time before the commencing time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply the Act to certificates issued under section 305 in the same way as it does to certificates given under that section
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate issued under section 305 at any time before the commencing time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply the Act to certificates issued under section 305 in the same way as it does to certificates given under that section
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of certificates issued by members or special members before and after the commencing time
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: ...at any time before the commencing time by a member or special member...

31 Amendments of the Safety, Rehabilitation and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.80
note: Amendments of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 apply to certain individuals.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Amendments of the Safety, Rehabilitation and

32 Amendment of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.80
note: Amends Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 regarding former certificates and documents.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Former members or staff members become permanent
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.81
note: Former members or staff become permanent employees for the purposes of Superannuation Acts.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide permanent employment
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 Former members or staff members become permanent

34 Warrants or writs etc. may continue to be executed
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.82
note: Authority continues to be executable after commencement time
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority remains valid
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Warrants or writs etc. may continue to be executed

35 Regulations dealing with matters of a transitional or
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.82
note: Governor-General may make regulations on transitional or saving matters.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
schema version: 2

4 Appointment of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.70
note: Amendments do not affect prior appointments.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

5 Continuation of secondments
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.70
note: Continuation of arrangements under section 33 and 39C of the former Act.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Determinations under subsection 30(1) of the former Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.70
note: Determinations under subsection 30(1) of the former Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Continuation of awards or certified agreements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.71
note: Continuation of awards or certified agreements for Australian Federal Police members and staff
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provision continues to apply until earlier of certain days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues existing provisions for AFP members and staff
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: Award or certified agreement in force before commencing time

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Continuation of awards or certified agreements

8 Determinations under subsection 30(2) of the former Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.71
note: Determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act continues in force.
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination overlaps with the commencing time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with the commencing time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text recognizes the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of the determination by AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination continues in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to continue
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text diffuses the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of the determination
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text traces the temporal history of the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal tracing of the determination
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Determinations under subsection 30(2) of the former Act

9 Misconduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.72
note: Termination of employment for pre-commencement misconduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to terminate employment
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Misconduct

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
has part: 2(4) Commencement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement within 6 months

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 items
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

2(4) Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 items
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
note: Amendment of Schedule 1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 2000
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 and other legislation, and for related purposes
identifier: No. 9 of 2000
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU