Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 2000
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 9 of 2000
description: An Act to amend the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 and other legislation, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
has part: 2(4) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-norm

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement within 6 months
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(4) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-4
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Amendment of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.8
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sec-3-norm

1 After section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-norm

3A Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a
has part: 3A(1) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(2) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(3) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(4) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(5) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(6) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(7) Overview of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9

3A(1) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-norm

3A(2) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners are appointed by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(2) Overview of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Appoints
logic summary: Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners are appointed.
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners are appointed by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A(3) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-3
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: The Commissioner may engage persons as AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-3-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(3) Overview of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3A(4) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: Members of the Australian Federal Police are members of the AFP.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(4) Overview of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Membership is a property.
premise text: The Commissioner and any Deputy Commissioner are members of the Australian Federal Police.
conclusion text: They are members of the AFP.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A(5) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: Commissioner may appoint special members to assist the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(5) Overview of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A(6) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: The Commissioner has the general administration of and control of the operations of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(6) Overview of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to administer and control the operations of the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A(7) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-7
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: Overview of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-7-norm

2 Subsection 4(1) (definition of adjustment payment)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Definition of adjustment payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.10
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1) (definition of adjustment payment)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term 'adjustment payment'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for adjustment payment
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Definition of AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.10
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of appoint)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Repeal definition of appoint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.10
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Australian workplace agreement has the same meaning as in the Workplace Relations Act 1996.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of Australian workplace agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Defines blood test as a test to determine alcohol levels in a person's blood.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-norm

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Defines body sample as human biological fluid, tissue, or breath
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies body sample into specific categories
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a standard for what constitutes a body sample
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Defines breath test as a test to determine alcohol in blood
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to definition of breath test
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Definition of certified agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of term
premise text: Act 1996
conclusion text: certified agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Definition of commissioned police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-10-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 4(1) (definition of commissioned rank)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Repeal definition of commissioned rank
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-11-norm

12 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Defines Commissioner's Orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-norm

13 Subsection 4(1) (definition of maximum age)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Repeal definition of maximum age
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-norm

14 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Definition of Australian Federal Police member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: Member is defined as...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner of Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: The definition includes...
conclusion text: ...an AFP employee in respect of whom a declaration under section 40B is in force.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 4(1) (definition of non-commissioned rank)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Repeal definition of non-commissioned rank
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-15-norm

16 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Definition of overseas
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Defines prohibited drug
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on specified drugs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Defines class of prohibited drug
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Defines prohibited drug test
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on testing for prohibited drugs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies drug test as a prohibited drug test
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Definition of senior executive AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-19-norm

20 Subsection 4(1) (definition of senior executive
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Repeal definition of commissioned police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Defines serious misconduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-21-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 4(1) (definition of special member)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Substitute section 40E for section 27.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-22-norm

23 Subsection 4(1) (definition of staff member)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Repeal definition of staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-norm

24 After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Insert clause after section 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-norm

4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4a
note: Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on specified drugs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
has part: 25(2) Subsection 5(2)
has part: 25(3) Subsection 5(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13

25(2) Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-2
part of: 25 Subsection 5(2)
note: Law provision refers to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25(2) Subsection 5(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers-to
logic summary: Refers to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and
conclusion text: (the provision of the law is to be read as referring to the member to whom the declaration applies.)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the period when the declaration is in force.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a provision of a law is, by virtue of subsection (1), to be read as referring to a member of the Australian Federal Police holding a particular rank; and
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

25(3) Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-3
part of: 25 Subsection 5(2)
note: The Commissioner may declare a member's rank.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of rank is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

26 Part II (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-norm

27 Division 1 of Part II (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-norm

28 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-norm

6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm

29 Paragraph 9(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Repeal and substitute paragraph 9(1)(a) with new powers and duties for constables.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-29-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Paragraph 9(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30 Paragraph 9(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Repeal paragraph 9(1)(c) and substitute with new obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Paragraph 9(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Paragraph 9(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Repeal and substitute a reference to an officer of police with a member of a particular rank.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Paragraph 9(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
has part: 32(2A) After subsection 9(2)
has part: 32(2B) After subsection 9(2)
has part: 32(2C) After subsection 9(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15

32(2A) After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a
part of: 32 After subsection 9(2)
note: Declares a member's rank for purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
logic summary: Declares a rank obligation
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...a member is of a particular rank for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: define interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for rank declaration
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: justify
logic summary: Justifies the declaration of a rank obligation
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...a member is of a particular rank for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: propagate
logic summary: Propagates the declaration of a rank obligation
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: infer
logic summary: Infers the implications of rank declaration
premise text: (2A) The Commissioner may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32(2B) After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b
part of: 32 After subsection 9(2)
note: Commissioner may declare member's rank for purposes of subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2B) After subsection 9(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
logic summary: Commissioner declares rank.
premise text: (2A) declaration is in force under subsection (2A)
conclusion text: (2B) Commissioner may declare member's rank.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32(2C) After subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2c
part of: 32 After subsection 9(2)
note: Ceases to be in force when the declaration under subsection (2A) ceases to be in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2c-norm

33 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Omit specific language from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-norm

34 Paragraph 12(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Omit specific language from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified language.
premise text: Omit ‘a member or staff member’.
conclusion text: Substitute with Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, or AFP employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Paragraph 12E(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Omit 'a staff member', substitute 'an AFP employee who is not a member'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-35-norm

36 Paragraph 12E(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Substitute employees in a specific context
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Paragraph 12E(1)(b)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

37 Subsection 12E(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Omit 'a staff member', substitute 'an AFP employee'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-norm

38 Part III
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Repeal Part III
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-norm

39 Part IV (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Repeal and substitute heading of Australian Federal Police Act 1979 Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-norm

40 Subsection 17(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Substitute "one or more Deputy Commissioners" for "a Deputy Commissioner"
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Subsection 17(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

41 Subsections 17(5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41-norm

42 Subsection 18(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Omit specific action under subsection 25(1A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-42-norm

43 Subsection 19(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Omit specific action under subsection 25(1A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-43-norm

44 Subsection 20(2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Repeal subsection 20(2B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-44-norm

45 Divisions 2 and 3 of Part IV
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Repeal Divisions, substitute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-45-norm

23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-2
has part: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
has part: 23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17

23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer in respect of AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Commissioner has rights, duties and powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
note: Rights and duties of the Commissioner regarding AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
held by: LegalPerson
scope note: held by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Commissioner has rights and duties.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The Commissioner has rights and duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Rights and duties apply during employment.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties apply during employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Rights and duties are traceable to employment.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties are traceable to employment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: in
logic summary: Rights and duties diffuse to employees.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties diffuse to employees.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: in
logic summary: Rights and duties are recognized by AI.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties are recognized by AI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24 Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
has part: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18

24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: The Commissioner may engage persons as employees subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to engage persons as employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Conditions for engaging AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to notify conditions for engaging AFP employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Conditions for engagement of AFP employees may vary beyond those implied by subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permitted variation in engagement conditions
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit the conditions that may be applied to the engagement of an AFP employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (2) and variation in engagement conditions
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit the conditions that may be applied to the engagement of an AFP employee
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (2) and variation in engagement conditions
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit the conditions that may be applied to the engagement of an AFP employee
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Classification of engagement conditions as varying beyond those implied by subsection (2)
premise text: Conditions for engagement are classified as varying beyond those implied by subsection (2)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: asserts
logic summary: Validation of classification of engagement conditions
premise text: Conditions for engagement are classified as varying beyond those implied by subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens as AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Commissioner must engage Australian citizens.
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: Commissioner's engagement period
premise text: Commissioner engages Australian citizens during this period.
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: Commissioner's engagement period
premise text: Commissioner engages Australian citizens during this period.
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens during this period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional diffusion: Commissioner's decision
premise text: Commissioner considers it appropriate to engage non-Australian citizens.
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens unless considered appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional decision: Commissioner's judgment
premise text: Commissioner considers it appropriate to engage non-Australian citizens.
conclusion text: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens unless considered appropriate.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Exemption from engagement for overseas duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exempts engagement for overseas duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Senior executive AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-2
note: Commissioner may declare an AFP employee a senior executive AFP employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Senior executive AFP employees
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commissioner may declare.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Continuous employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
note: Employment is taken to be continuous if engaged under section 24 for a period and re-engaged immediately after the end of that period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Continuous employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Continuous employment implies obligation to provide continuous service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2
has part: 27(1) Remuneration and other conditions
has part: 27(2) Remuneration and other conditions
has part: 27(3) Remuneration and other conditions
has part: 27(4) Remuneration and other conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19

27(1) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions
note: Determination of remuneration and terms for AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Remuneration and other conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Regulation of AFP employee employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions
note: May adopt or incorporate provisions of an award or certified agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(2) Remuneration and other conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permits adoption or incorporation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(3) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions
note: Overrules determination under subsection (1) to the extent of any inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Override
logic summary: Permits overriding a determination under subsection (1)
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Applies to temporal interval of subsection (1)
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Applies to recurring trace of Australian workplace agreements
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Applies to diffusion of Australian workplace agreements
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Applies to knowledge graph of Australian workplace agreements
premise text: (3) An award, a certified agreement or an Australian workplace agreement overrides any determination under subsection (1), to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

27(4) Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions
note: Award has the same meaning as in the Workplace Relations Act 1996.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-27-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: same-as
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Workplace Relations Act 1996.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Termination of employment by Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
note: The Commissioner may terminate employment by notice in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
has part: 30(1) Resignation
has part: 30(2) Resignation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20

30(1) Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1
part of: 30 Resignation
note: Employee must give written notice of resignation and specify the effective date.
description: Written notice of resignation and effective date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) Resignation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must give written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2
part of: 30 Resignation
note: Cannot be earlier than 14 days or later than 4 months after notice is given to the Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) Resignation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must not be earlier than 14 days or later than 4 months after notice is given to the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval classification
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval classification with ordering
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval classification with diffusion
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval classification with cognitive AI
premise text: (2) The day specified in a notice under paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must be within a certain range after notice is given to the Commissioner.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-2
has part: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
has part: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20

31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
note: Employee entitled to retire upon notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has obligation to retire
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
note: Minimum retiring age is 55 years, or as prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-31-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines minimum retiring age
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
has part: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21

32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: Commissioner may retire employee by notice if employee consents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to retire
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: Employee may consent to retirement under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-norm

32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: Certification of incapacity is required for retirement on invalidity grounds.
description: Commissioner's certification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Establishes the condition for retirement on invalidity grounds
premise text: (a) a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and (b) the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period); and (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;
conclusion text: The Commissioner certifies in writing that the person’s physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not so re-engaged.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for retirement on invalidity grounds
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and (b) the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period); and (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;
conclusion text: The person is taken, for the purposes of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 and the Superannuation Act, to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the initial period and the certification of incapacity
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and (b) the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period); and (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;
conclusion text: The Commissioner certifies in writing that the person’s physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not so re-engaged.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the obligation
premise text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
conclusion text: The Commissioner's certification is required for retirement on invalidity grounds.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: Commonwealth Superannuation Board of Trustees No. 2 must give a certificate under section 54C of the Superannuation Act 1976 for an AFP employee to be retired on invalidity grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a certificate
premise text: Section 54C of the Superannuation Act 1976
conclusion text: Certificate under section 54C must be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Maximum retiring age within the meaning of the Superannuation Act 1976
premise text: Superannuation Act 1990
conclusion text: Age greater than or equal to maximum retiring age
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Not capable of being retired on the ground of invalidity unless a certificate is given
premise text: Part IVA of the Superannuation Act 1976
conclusion text: Certificate under section 54C must be given for retirement on invalidity grounds
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Certificate under section 54C must be given for an AFP employee to be retired on invalidity grounds
premise text: Section 32(4) of the Superannuation Act 1990
conclusion text: Certificate under section 54C must be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: AFP employee must provide a certificate from the Commonwealth Superannuation Board of Trustees No. 1 to be retired on invalidity grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2
has part: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22

33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Employee's retirement takes effect on the specified day after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee's retirement obligation
premise text: Employee has consented to retirement
conclusion text: Retirement takes effect on specified day
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Employee must be informed of right to review retirement decision within a specified period.
description: Notice informing employee of right to apply for review of Commissioner's decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must be informed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-3
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Regulations regarding the timing of retirement on invalidity grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-3-norm

33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-4
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Regulations may make provision for review of decisions to retire AFP employees under subsection 32(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-4-norm

33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-5
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Regulations may make provision for giving written reasons and a copy of those reasons to the AFP employee concerned.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-33-2-ss-5-norm

34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
has part: 34(1) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
has part: 34(2) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
has part: 34(3) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24

34(1) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
note: Employee must retire voluntarily if resigning between ages 55 and 60.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee must retire voluntarily.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Resignation must occur between ages 55 and 60.
premise text: (b) the resignation takes effect on or after the day on which he or she reaches 55 but before he or she reaches 60;
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Resignation must occur before reaching age 60.
premise text: (b) the resignation takes effect on or after the day on which he or she reaches 55 but before he or she reaches 60;
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: State permits voluntary retirement between ages 55 and 60.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Resignation implies voluntary retirement.
premise text: (b) the resignation takes effect on or after the day on which he or she reaches 55 but before he or she reaches 60;
conclusion text: ...he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
note: Employee must retire voluntarily if terminated between ages 55 and 60.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(2) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to retire voluntarily
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between ages 55 and 60
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between ages 55 and 60
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF-THEN
logic summary: Conditional relationship between employment termination and retirement
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of retirement as voluntary using AI
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: he or she is taken, for the purposes of the Superannuation Act, to have retired voluntarily.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
note: Voluntary retirement condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(3) Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-34-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: 55
conclusion text: 60
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-2
note: Commissioner may engage consultants or independent contractors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-35-2-norm

36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
has part: 36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(5) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25

36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Oath or affirmation required for Deputy Commissioner before commencing duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take oath or affirmation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Deputy Commissioner must enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation upon appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation after declaration as a member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to enter into undertaking and make oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation upon appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to enter into undertaking and make oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(5) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Prohibition on re-appointment for a term immediately after the end of the previous appointment's term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits re-appointment for a specific term.
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Disjoint
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between appointments
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of 're-appoint'
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-36-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Limits re-appointment to prevent overlap with previous appointments
premise text: (5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), appoint does not include re-appoint for a term that begins immediately after the end of the term of the last previous appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Part V
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Repeal Part and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-46-norm

37 General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2
has part: 37(1) General administration and control
has part: 37(2) General administration and control
has part: 37(3) General administration and control
has part: 37(4) General administration and control
has part: 37(5) General administration and control
has part: 37(6) General administration and control
has part: 37(7) General administration and control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26

37(1) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: The Commissioner has the general administration of, and the control of the operations of, the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) General administration and control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to administer and control the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Commissioner regarding general policy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(3) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: The Minister may give written directions to the Commissioner regarding common services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Minister may give written directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(4) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: Must comply with directions given under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(5) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: The Minister may make an arrangement with the appropriate Minister of a State for the provision or development of common services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make an arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(6) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: Reports to be provided by the Commissioner to the Minister
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(7) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: Definition of common services and Secretary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: common services includes services consisting of, or provided by means of...
conclusion text: Secretary means the Secretary to the Department
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-37-2-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (7) In this section:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
note: The Commissioner may issue orders with respect to the general administration of, and the control of the operations of, the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to issue orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39-2
note: Compliance with Commissioner's Orders is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-39-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
note: Do not disobey or fail to carry out lawful directions, instructions, or orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-diffusion-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disobedience and non-compliance.
premise text: Lawful direction, instruction, or order given by the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner.
conclusion text: Do not disobey or fail to carry out.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disobedience and non-compliance under supervision.
premise text: Lawful direction, instruction, or order given by the AFP employee or special member under whose control, direction, or supervision they perform their duties.
conclusion text: Do not disobey or fail to carry out.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between lawful directions, instructions, and orders.
premise text: An AFP employee or special member must not disobey or fail to carry out a lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.
conclusion text: Lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders.
premise text: An AFP employee or special member must not disobey or fail to carry out a lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.
conclusion text: Non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders is recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders.
premise text: An AFP employee or special member must not disobey or fail to carry out a lawful direction, instruction, or order given at any time.
conclusion text: Non-compliance with lawful directions, instructions, and orders is diffused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a
has part: 40A(1) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(2) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(3) Self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28

40A(1) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1
part of: 40A Self-incrimination
note: AFP employee or special member must provide information under section 39 or 40.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(1) Self-incrimination
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A(2) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination
note: Employee's self-incrimination information is not admissible in evidence against them, except for disciplinary proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(2) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to not use self-incrimination information against employees in certain circumstances.
premise text: The State is required to protect employee rights.
conclusion text: The State must not use self-incrimination information against employees in disciplinary proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to employees to refuse self-incrimination information in certain circumstances.
premise text: Employees have the right to refuse self-incrimination information.
conclusion text: Employees may refuse self-incrimination information in disciplinary proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the use of self-incrimination information against employees in certain circumstances.
premise text: The State must not use self-incrimination information against employees.
conclusion text: The State may not use self-incrimination information against employees in disciplinary proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Creates a right for employees to refuse self-incrimination information in certain circumstances.
premise text: Employees have the right to refuse self-incrimination information.
conclusion text: Employees are entitled to refuse self-incrimination information in disciplinary proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
logic summary: Establishes a duty on the State to protect employee rights.
premise text: The State has a responsibility to protect employees.
conclusion text: The State must protect employee rights.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A(3) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3
part of: 40A Self-incrimination
note: No self-incrimination for testing purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(3) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits self-incrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishes obligation to provide relevant information for testing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40B AFP employees who are members of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40b
note: Declaration of AFP employee membership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40b-norm

40C Determination of competency or qualification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40c
note: Commissioner may specify competency and qualification requirements by written determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40c-norm

40D Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d
has part: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(2) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(3) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(5) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29

40D(1) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: The Governor-General may declare a member to be a commissioned police officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Declaration of commission is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(2) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: Recommendation from Commissioner required before declaring a member as a commissioned police officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires recommendation from Commissioner
premise text: The Minister must have received a recommendation.
conclusion text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation is provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
premise text: The recommendation from Commissioner must be received before the Governor-General makes a declaration.
conclusion text: The recommendation is necessary for the declaration to occur during this time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Describes a requirement or condition
premise text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation from Commissioner is provided.
conclusion text: The recommendation from Commissioner is necessary for the declaration to occur.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Describes a requirement or condition
premise text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation from Commissioner is provided.
conclusion text: The recommendation from Commissioner must be disseminated to others for the declaration to occur.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Describes a requirement or condition
premise text: A declaration can only be made if the recommendation from Commissioner is provided.
conclusion text: The recommendation from Commissioner must be processed by AI for the declaration to occur.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(3) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: The Commissioner must recommend a member for commission only if they are competent and qualified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to recommend members for commission.
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The recommendation must be made at least when the member meets the qualifications.
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The recommendation must be made at least when the member meets the qualifications.
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: The recommendation is conditional on the Commissioner's satisfaction.
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The recommendation is related to the qualifications of the member.
premise text: The Commissioner may make such a recommendation only if...
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the member is, in accordance with the regulations, competent and qualified.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(4) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: Commissioner may declare a member commissioned police officer upon authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorization is required.
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Authorization must be prior to declaration.
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Declaration implies authorization.
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
logic summary: Authorization is necessary for declaration.
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
logic summary: Declaration is a type of authorization.
premise text: (4) If the Governor-General, in writing, authorises...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner may declare a member...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(5) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner must declare a member competent and qualified to be a commissioned police officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40D(5) Commissioned police officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Declaration is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(6) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: Governor-General's power not limited by authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits the Governor-General's power
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40E Special members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40e
has part: 40E(1) Special members
has part: 40E(2) Special members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30

40E(1) Special members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1
part of: 40E Special members
note: Commissioner may appoint a person as a special member of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commissioner may appoint a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40E(2) Special members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2
part of: 40E Special members
note: Special members have powers and duties during appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40E(2) Special members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Possession of powers and duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f
has part: 40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30

40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-1
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-1-norm

40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Consultation required before terminating a secondment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may at any time terminate a secondment...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-3
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Guidelines for secondment of AFP employees to foreign countries or other bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-3-norm

40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Minister must consult Commissioner about guidelines before giving them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult Commissioner
premise text: (4) The Minister must...
conclusion text: ...before giving them to the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Cannot arrange for AFP employee to be seconded outside Australia without guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g
has part: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31

40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
note: Continues discipline obligations etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
note: Remains subject to same obligations and liabilities in relation to discipline
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Remains subject to same obligations and liabilities in relation to discipline
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
note: Rights and powers of an AFP employee unaffected by secondment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No obligation to relinquish rights and powers
premise text: Nothing in this section affects...
conclusion text: ...rights, powers or immunities...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: No prohibition on exercising rights and powers
premise text: Nothing in this section affects...
conclusion text: ...or liabilities in relation to discipline...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40H Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h
has part: 40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32

40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.
note: Determination of duties and places for AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Assigns duties to AFP employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.
note: Duties to meet special operational needs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.
note: Commissioner may determine accommodation arrangements for employee performing special operational duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.32
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to determine accommodation arrangements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40J Suspension from duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40j
note: Suspension from duties of AFP employees may be provided.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40J Suspension from duties etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to suspend duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k
has part: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33

40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k-ss-1
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
note: Termination of employment for serious misconduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
note: Declaration must be made within 24 hours of decision to terminate employment.
description: Copy of declaration to AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Declaration must be made within 24 hours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Commissioner must give copy of declaration to AFP employee
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
note: Definition of serious misconduct for termination of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with legal implications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l
has part: 40L(1) Financial statements
has part: 40L(2) Financial statements
has part: 40L(3) Financial statements
has part: 40L(4) Financial statements
has part: 40L(5) Financial statements
has part: 40L(6) Financial statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34

40L(1) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: The Commissioner may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to provide a statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(1) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The Commissioner may give a direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(2) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Financial statements must be provided in a specified form and manner, with accompanying documents.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(2) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide financial statements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(3) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Must provide financial statement within 2 months
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(3) Financial statements
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide financial statement within 2 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(4) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Commissioner may grant extension of time for giving statement in special circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(4) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commissioner may grant extension of time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(5) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Must provide financial statement despite potential incrimination or penalty
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(5) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide financial statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(6) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: No admissible in evidence against person in proceedings for disciplinary offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(6) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits admissible evidence in certain proceedings.
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits admissible evidence for certain purposes.
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on persons to follow provision.
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40l-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Grants right to persons.
premise text: (6) However, any statement so given is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m
has part: 40M(1) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
has part: 40M(2) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
has part: 40M(3) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35

40M(1) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1
part of: 40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for
note: A person authorized may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to undergo a breath test or provide a body sample for a prohibited drug test.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40M(1) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Requires the person to provide a breath test or body sample
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40M(2) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2
part of: 40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for
note: Provide blood sample if breath test indicates alcohol presence
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to provide blood sample
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40M(3) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3
part of: 40M General testing of AFP employees or special members for
note: Must comply with direction given under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40M(3) General testing of AFP employees or special members for
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n
has part: 40N(1) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(2) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(3) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(4) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
has part: 40N(5) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36

40N(1) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
note: A person authorized may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to undergo a breath test or provide a body sample for a prohibited drug test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40N(1) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May give direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N(2) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
note: A person authorized may give a member or special member a written direction requiring them to undergo a breath test or provide a body sample for a prohibited drug test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40N(2) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorization to give direction
premise text: Person authorized
conclusion text: Written direction given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N(3) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
note: Must provide direction by authorized person after incident.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40N(3) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N(4) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
note: Require AFP employee or special member to provide blood sample for test.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40N(4) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N(5) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5
part of: 40N Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
note: Must comply with a direction given under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40N(5) Testing of AFP employees or special members for alcohol and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: Given direction
conclusion text: Compliance required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40n-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: Knowledge of direction
premise text: Employee or member knows direction
conclusion text: Compliance justified
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40P Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40p
note: Regulations may make provision in relation to the authorisation of persons to give directions under sections 40M and 40N.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40p-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation of persons to give directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40Q Admissibility of test results etc. in legal proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40q
note: Exemptions from admissibility in certain proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40q-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-40q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40Q Admissibility of test results etc. in legal proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

47 Section 41
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Defines 'changeover day' as the commencement date of Schedule 1 to the Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1999.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-47-norm

48 Section 41 (definition of corruption offence)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Definition of corruption offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-48-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Section 41 (definition of corruption offence)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

49 Section 41 (paragraph (a) of the definition of corruption
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Omit 'office as such a member or staff member, as the case may be', substitute 'office as such a person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting and substituting
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Section 41 (paragraph (b) of the definition of corruption
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Substitute “such a person” for “such a member or staff member” in the definition of corruption offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Section 41 (paragraph (b) of the definition of corruption
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces a placeholder with a specific value.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Section 41
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Amendment of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-51-norm

52 After section 41
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Insert clause after section 41
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-norm

41A Old law members or staff members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41a
note: Definition of old law member or staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41A Old law members or staff members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of old law member or staff member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Paragraph 43(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with charging certain individuals with an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-53-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits charging certain individuals with an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Paragraph 44(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Conviction of certain individuals is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Paragraph 44(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Subsection 47(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Omit 'a member or a staff member of the Australian Federal Police' and substitute 'an AFP employee'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-55-norm

56 Subsection 47(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Paragraph 47(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute specific conditions for AFP employees and old law members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Paragraph 47(3)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to repeal and substitute specific conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Paragraph 47(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Omit “would,”, substitute “who would,”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-58-norm

59 Subsection 47(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Substitution of terms in subsection 47(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-59-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Subsection 47(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60 Subsection 48(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Repeals outdated appointment clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Subsection 48(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Legislative repeal
premise text: Obligation to follow outdated clause
conclusion text: Clause repealed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Subsection 49(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Substitute 'if a person who is an AFP employee' for 'where a member or staff member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61 Subsection 49(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces placeholder with specific term
premise text: Omit 'where a member or staff member'
conclusion text: Substitute 'if a person who is an AFP employee'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Paragraph 49(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Replace 'member or staff member' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-62-norm

63 Paragraph 49(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Omit specific words from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-63-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of words
premise text: Omitting words is prohibited
conclusion text: The text must not omit the words
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Paragraphs 51(1)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Cease being an AFP employee upon charge or retirement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Paragraphs 51(1)(b) and (c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Cease being an AFP employee upon charge or retirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Paragraph 51(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-65-norm

66 At the end of section 51
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: Avoids cessation of AFP employee status after initial engagement period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-66-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 At the end of section 51
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67 Section 52
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-67-norm

52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
has part: 52(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 52(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42

52(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Suspension without pay for AFP employees charged with disciplinary offenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Suspension without pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Person cannot pay employee contributions under a superannuation scheme after cessation day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits paying employee contributions
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for paying employee contributions
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates that paying employee contributions is not allowed after cessation day
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads prohibition to all persons affected by subsection (1)
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Classification
logic summary: Classifies entities as persons who must not pay employee contributions
premise text: (2) If subsection (1) applies in relation to a person, the person must not...
conclusion text: ...pay employee contributions under any superannuation scheme of which he or she is a member on or after the cessation day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-3
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Person ceases to be an AFP employee under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-3-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

52(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-4
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Person ceases to be an AFP employee under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-4-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

52(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-5
part of: 52 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Clarifies cessation of AFP employee status
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-52-2-ss-5-norm

68 Section 60
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Repeal section 60
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-norm

69 Subsection 60A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new definition for certain individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Subsection 60A(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Subsection 61(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Omit specific terms from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-70-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specific terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Subsection 62(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific phrase from text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Subsection 62(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Repeal penalty, substitute imprisonment for 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Subsection 62(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Repeal subsection 62(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-73-norm

74 Section 63
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
note: Insert 'or special member' after 'member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Section 63
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of 'or special member'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Section 63 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
note: Repeal penalty, substitute imprisonment for 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-75-norm

76 Subsection 64(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-76-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Subsection 64(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

77 Subsection 64(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
note: Insert “or special member” after “member”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Subsection 64(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Subsection 64A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
note: Must hold a rank declared by regulations to be applicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78 Subsection 64A(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Subsection 64A(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
note: Omit $500, substitute 5 penalty units
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-79-norm

80 Subsection 64AA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
note: Modify suspension rules for AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Subsection 64AA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Modification
logic summary: Change the wording of a provision
premise text: Original text
conclusion text: New text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Subsection 64AA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-81-norm

82 Paragraph 64B(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
note: Omit specified phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-82-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Subsection 66(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
note: Omit specific language from existing provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-83-norm

84 Subsection 66(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
note: Omit specific language from subsection 66(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-84-norm

85 Section 68
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
note: Repeal section and substitute with Schedule 1 amendment of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-85-norm

68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2
has part: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(5) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46

68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Certification of appointment and status of member
description: Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Certification obligation
premise text: The Commissioner may certify...
conclusion text: The person has been appointed as a Deputy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Certification of member's appointment and status
description: (a), (b), (c), or (d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Certification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-3
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Certification of special member appointment details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-3-norm

68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Commissioner must certify a person's membership status.
description: Conclusive evidence of certificate under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commissioner has an obligation to certify a person's membership status.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(5) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Presumption of certificate validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumes document to be valid
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate
conclusion text: Matters stated in the certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69-2
note: Must do without patronage or favouritism when engaging AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.47
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a
has part: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48

69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
note: The Commissioner may engage persons overseas as employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to engage persons overseas
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Commissioner has the right to act as an employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
note: Commissioner's power to engage persons overseas is not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commissioner's power is not limited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b
has part: 69B(1) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
has part: 69B(2) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
has part: 69B(3) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48

69B(1) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1
part of: 69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
note: Exemptions from Workplace Relations Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69B(1) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(2) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2
part of: 69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
note: The Workplace Relations Act 1996 does not apply to the termination of employment of AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69B(2) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(3) Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3
part of: 69B Limited operation of Workplace Relations Act
note: Exemptions from Workplace Relations Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ~
logic summary: Negative scope of application
premise text: (a) that is not mentioned in this section; and (b) to which the Workplace Relations Act 1996 would not otherwise apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69C Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69c
note: Delegation of powers, functions or duties to a Deputy Commissioner, AFP employee or special member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69c-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69c-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69d
has part: 69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
has part: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49

69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
note: The Commissioner may arrange for a person to assist the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
note: Terms and conditions for persons assisting the Australian Federal Police must be specified in an agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Australian Federal Police to specify terms and conditions in an agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Paragraph 70(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
note: Insert “or special member” after “member”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86 Paragraph 70(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of 'or special member'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 At the end of paragraph 70(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
note: Add “and”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87 At the end of paragraph 70(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to add ‘and’
premise text: None
conclusion text: Add ‘and’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Paragraph 70(aa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
note: Insert 'or special member' after 'member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88 Paragraph 70(aa)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of 'or special member'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 At the end of paragraph 70(aa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
note: Add “and”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89 At the end of paragraph 70(aa)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
conclusion text: The State must add “and”.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Paragraph 70(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
note: Omit '$500', substitute '5 penalty units'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-90-norm

91 At the end of paragraph 70(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
note: Add “and”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91 At the end of paragraph 70(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to add ‘and’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 At the end of section 70
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
note: Requiring AFP employees to make and subscribe oaths or affirmations of secrecy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92 At the end of section 70
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make and subscribe oaths or affirmations of secrecy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to make deductions from salary to satisfy judgment debt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Sections 72 and 73
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-93-norm

94 Section 76
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
note: Repeal section 76
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-94-norm

95 Section 77
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
note: Insertion of section reference after section 72
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-95-norm

96 Sections 78 and 79
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
note: Repeal sections 78 and 79
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.51
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-1-sec-96-norm

1 Paragraphs (z) and (za) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Repeal paragraphs of Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits actions under section 28, 40F or 40H of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 and Archives Act 1983
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals paragraphs of Schedule 2
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subparagraph 47(2)(a)(iiia)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with a new definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subparagraph 47(2)(a)(iiia)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 Paragraph 23(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Replace paragraph with a new definition of the Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Paragraph 23(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing text with new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of AFP appointee)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Definition of AFP appointee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of AFP appointee)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines the term
conclusion text: AFP appointee means a Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, an AFP employee or a special member of the Australian Federal Police (all within the meaning of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Definition of Commissioner's Orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal police officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Definition of Federal police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal police officer)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 6(5) (definition of authorised appointee)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Definition of authorised appointee modified to use 'Commissioner's Orders' instead of 'General Orders or General Instructions'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 6(5) (definition of General Instructions)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Repeal the definition of General Instructions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 6(5) (definition of General Orders)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Repeal the definition of General Orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-norm

10 Subsection 6B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Omit 'a senior member', substitute 'an authorised member'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'a senior member'
premise text: Omit ‘a senior member’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘an authorised member’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 6B(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Defines authorised member for purposes of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Subsection 6B(7)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Authorised member is defined
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 21(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Omit 'General Orders and General Instructions', substitute 'Commissioner's Orders'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-12-norm

13 Subsection 52B(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Omit specific action from AFP appointees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reducing an AFP appointee to a lower rank or level
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Paragraph 52B(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Omit specific phrase from paragraph.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reducing appointee to lower rank.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 53(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reducing an AFP appointee to a lower rank or level.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 67(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Omit specific phrase from Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reducing appointee to lower rank
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Assistant Commissioner)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Repeal definition of Assistant Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with new definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the repealed paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with a new definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Defines senior executive AFP employee term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Paragraph 15J(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Authorise senior executive AFP employee to perform specific task
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: Senior executive AFP employee
conclusion text: Perform task
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 15R(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Omit 'an Assistant Commissioner', substitute 'a senior executive AFP employee authorised in writing under section 15J'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-22-norm

23 Paragraph 15S(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Omit 'an Assistant Commissioner', substitute 'a senior executive AFP employee authorised in writing under section 15J'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-23-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an Assistant Commissioner'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Repeal of paragraph (b) of the definition of authorized person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-24-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of a specific action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Definition of AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 2(1)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsection 7(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Substitute 'an AFP employee' for 'a member or staff member of the AFP'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Subsection 7(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
note: Omit certain individuals from the definition of Australian Federal Police employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain individuals from being considered Australian Federal Police employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (g) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Repeal of paragraph (g) and substitution with new definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (g) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the old paragraph (g)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subsection 171(3) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Repeal paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Subsection 171(3) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits AFP employees and special members from being authorised persons.
premise text: AFP employee or special member within the meaning of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
conclusion text: Not an authorised person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Subsection 180(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
note: Omit specific term from Australian Federal Police Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Subsection 180(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Part 1 of the Dictionary (definition of member of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Repeal the definition of Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Part 1 of the Dictionary (definition of member of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Part 1 of the Dictionary (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
note: Insert 'or special member' after 'member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-32-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Part 1 of the Dictionary (paragraph (a) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

33 Subsection 10(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Employment in Government Service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Subsection 10(2A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes to be employed
logic summary: Employment obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subparagraph 85(2)(k)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with a new definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-34-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Subparagraph 85(2)(k)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsection 143(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
note: Omit outdated police rank from legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.57
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Subsection 143(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits a specific action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Subsection 8(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
note: Definition of AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Subsection 8(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37 Subsection 8(2) (definition of dangerous operation)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
note: Omit “a member”, substitute “the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, a Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, or an AFP employee”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-37-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated terminology
premise text: Omit ‘a member’
conclusion text: Substitute with approved terminology
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Subsection 8(2) (definition of member)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
note: Repeal the definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-38-norm

39 Subsection 8(2) (definition of unauthorised person)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
note: Definition of unauthorized person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Subsection 8(2) (definition of unauthorised person)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'a member'
premise text: Definition of unauthorized person
conclusion text: Substitutes 'an AFP employee'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40 Paragraph 9(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
note: Replace the paragraph with a new obligation regarding the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Paragraph 9(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
note: Omit certain language from the Australian Federal Police or Defence Force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Subsection 9(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain language
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subsection 6(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with new definition of Commonwealth officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Subsection 6(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Paragraph 8(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
note: Treat certain actions as done or disclosed by the Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-43-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Australian Federal Police
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Paragraph 9(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
note: Substitute a Deputy Commissioner or AFP employee with the same meaning as the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Paragraph 9(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace a person with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Paragraph 10(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
note: Repeal and substitute a provision with an obligation to perform duties as specified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Paragraph 10(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Paragraph 11(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with provision for AFP employees and special members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.59
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Paragraph 11(2)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Repeals paragraph, imposes obligation on AFP employees and special members.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Paragraph 87(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
note: Repeal and substitute a specific employment option.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-47-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits service as a Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police or employment as an AFP employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Paragraph 87J(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
note: Repeal and substitute certain employment terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-48-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Paragraph 87J(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

49 Section 5 (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: Repeal and substitute a definition related to the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-49-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Section 5 (paragraph (d) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

50 Paragraph 5(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
note: Replace Commissioner of Australian Federal Police with Deputy Commissioner or AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Paragraph 5(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Replaces
logic summary: Replace existing provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
note: Omit certain language from a provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 51 Subsection 5(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain language
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subsection 3(1) (definition of member)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
note: Repeal the definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-52-norm

53 Paragraph 82(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-53-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Paragraph 82(3)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54 Paragraph 84(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-54-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Paragraph 84(5)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55 Subparagraph 84(6)(b)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
note: Insertion of 'or special member' after 'member'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-55-norm

56 Subsection 3(5A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
note: Replace 'member or staff member of the Australian Federal Police' with 'AFP employee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Subsection 3(5A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
note: Replace 'a member, or staff member' with 'an AFP employee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Section 10
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
note: Definition of AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58 Subsection 5(1)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

59 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
note: Authorisation required for senior executive AFP employee to perform duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Senior executive AFP employee has permission to perform duties
premise text: Senior executive AFP employee is authorised in writing by the Commissioner of Police
conclusion text: Senior executive AFP employee can perform duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-59-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorisation
premise text: Authorisation is valid during this period
conclusion text: Authorisation is valid within this time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (b)(iia) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with a new provision related to the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (b)(iia) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal a subparagraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
note: Defines a term for senior executive AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-61-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Subsection 5(1) (definition of staff member)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
note: Definition of staff member for Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.62
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-62-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Subsection 5(1) (definition of staff member)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63 Subsection 6N(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
note: Omit staff members of the Australian Federal Police, substitute AFP employees who are not members of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-63-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Paragraph 47(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
note: Omit certain titles from witnesses in the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Paragraph 47(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain titles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
note: Definition of AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65 Section 3
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
conclusion text: Insert: AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

66 Section 3 (definition of designated position)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
note: Definition of designated position
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-66-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Section 3 (definition of designated position)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67 Section 3 (definition of staff member)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
note: Repeal definition of staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-67-norm

68 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
note: Substitute “persons” for “members and staff members”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-68-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

69 Subsection 9(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-69-norm

70 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
note: Substitute ‘persons’ for ‘members or staff members’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-70-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 Subsection 12(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

71 Subsection 13(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
note: Omit specified terms from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-71-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Paragraph 13(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
note: Replace 'members or staff members' with 'persons'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Paragraph 13(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace words
premise text: Replace 'members or staff members' with 'persons'
conclusion text: Obligation to replace
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Paragraph 20(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
note: Omit specific language from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-73-norm

74 Paragraph 22(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
note: Omit specific language from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-74-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Subsection 25(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
note: Substitute “a person” for “a member or a staff member”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-75-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75 Subsection 25(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76 Subsection 25(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
note: Substitute “A person” for “A member or a staff member”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Subsection 25(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Subsection 25(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
note: Substitute “person” for “member or staff member”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-77-norm

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Subsection 25(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

78 Subsection 26(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
note: Omit specific terms from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-78-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specific terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Subsection 4(10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
note: Repeal subsection and amend other Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-79-norm

80 At the end of section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
note: Section 69B exemption from this Act applies to AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.65
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 At the end of section 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Section 69B exemption from this Act applies to AFP employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Paragraph 5(3)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.65
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-81-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Clause 3 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
note: Repeal clause in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.65
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-2-sec-82-norm

1 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Definitions for transitional provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-1-norm

2 Conversion of former members and staff members etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Conversion of former members and staff members etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.67
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-2-norm

3 Classification as senior executive AFP employee
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Classification as senior executive AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.69
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-3-norm

4 Appointment of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Amendments do not affect prior appointments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Continuation of secondments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Continuation of arrangements under section 33 and 39C of the former Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-5-norm

6 Determinations under subsection 30(1) of the former Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Determinations under subsection 30(1) of the former Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-6-norm

7 Continuation of awards or certified agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Continuation of awards or certified agreements for Australian Federal Police members and staff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.71
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Continuation of awards or certified agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues existing provisions for AFP members and staff
premise text: Award or certified agreement in force before commencing time
conclusion text: Provision continues to apply until earlier of certain days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Determinations under subsection 30(2) of the former Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act continues in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.71
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Determinations under subsection 30(2) of the former Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
logic summary: Obligation to continue
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...
conclusion text: The determination continues in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with the commencing time
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...
conclusion text: The determination overlaps with the commencing time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Temporal tracing of the determination
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...
conclusion text: The text traces the temporal history of the determination.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of the determination
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...
conclusion text: The text diffuses the determination.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of the determination by AI
premise text: (1) A determination under subsection 30(2) of the former Act...
conclusion text: The text recognizes the determination.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Termination of employment for pre-commencement misconduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.72
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Misconduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to terminate employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Certificates under subsection 12A(4) of the Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 apply retroactively.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.72
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: retroactive application
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before the commencing time.
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: information flow
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-10-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given before and after the commencing time.
premise text: Subsection 12A(4) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
conclusion text: Certificates under subsection 12A(4) apply retroactively in both directions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11 Repeal of subsection 20(2B) of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Repeal of subsection 20(2B) does not affect the application of subsection 33(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.72
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Repeal does not negate obligation
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments
conclusion text: Repeal does not affect application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Repeal overlaps with existing instrument
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments
conclusion text: Repeal overlaps with existing instrument
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Repeal implies no change to application
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments
conclusion text: Repeal implies no change to application
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Repeal diffuses to existing instrument
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments
conclusion text: Repeal diffuses to existing instrument
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Repeal inferences about application
premise text: Subsection 33(3) has an effect on instruments
conclusion text: Repeal inferences about application
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Repeal of section 39E of the Australian Federal Police Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Repeal of section 39E does not affect operation of Superannuation Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-12-norm

13 Continuation of section 49 of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Continuation of section 49 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Continuation of section 49 of the Australian Federal Police
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Continuation of section 51 of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Applicability of amendments to persons charged with offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Continuation of section 51 of the Australian Federal Police
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Amendments apply to persons charged with offences
premise text: Persons charged with offences
conclusion text: Amendments apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Continuation of section 52 of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: Continuation of section 52 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-15-norm

16 Continuation of secrecy obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Continuation of secrecy obligations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-16-norm

17 Certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
note: Certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 apply retroactively.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.74
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: retroactive application
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68.
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 apply retroactively.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68 before and after the commencing time.
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are applicable both before and after the commencing time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68 at any time.
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are applicable at any time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: information dissemination
logic summary: Applicable to certificates under section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 as in force at and after the commencing time applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are part of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-17-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
logic summary: Applicable to certificates given under section 68 by the Australian Federal Police.
premise text: Section 68 of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 applies to a certificate given under that section at any time before the commencing time in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
conclusion text: Certificates under section 68 are applicable by the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 References in statutory instruments to “staff member”
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
note: References to staff member are taken to be references to AFP employee who is not a member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.74
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 References in statutory instruments to “staff member”
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Obligation to refer to AFP employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Regulations may be made in relation to the continuation of processes and suspensions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.74
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-19-norm

20 Definition
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
note: Defines 'commencing time'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-20-norm

21 Amendment of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
note: Amendment of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-21-norm

22 Amendments of the Complaints (Australian Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
note: Amendments apply to action taken by AFP appointee at or after commencing time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-22-norm

23 Amendment of the Crimes Act 1914
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
note: Amends section 15U of the Crimes Act 1914 regarding certificates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies certificates
premise text: former and later certificates
conclusion text: same application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for certificates
premise text: commencing time
conclusion text: before/after
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Amendment of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
note: Amendment of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.77
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-24-norm

25 Amendments of the Evidence Act 1995
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
note: Amendments of the Evidence Act 1995
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.77
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-25-norm

26 Amendment of the Long Service Leave (Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
note: Amendment of section 10 of the Long Service Leave (Commonwealth Employees) Act 1976 does not affect its operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.78
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-26-norm

27 Amendment of the Migration Act 1958
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
note: Amendment of the Migration Act 1958
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.78
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-27-norm

28 Amendment of the Occupational Health and Safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
note: Amendment of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1991 applies to certain persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.79
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-28-norm

29 Amendment of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
note: Continuation of Act in relation to things done before the commencing time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.79
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Amendment of the Privacy Act 1988
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continuation of Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Amendment of the Radiocommunications Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
note: Applicability of Radiocommunications Act 1992 to certificates issued under section 305
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.80
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicability of the Act to certificates issued under section 305
premise text: The Radiocommunications Act 1992 as in force at and after the commencing time applies...
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between certificates issued before and after the commencing time
premise text: ...at any time before the commencing time by a member or special member...
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Recurring trace of certificates issued by members or special members before and after the commencing time
premise text: ...at any time before the commencing time by a member or special member...
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply the Act to certificates issued under section 305 in the same way as it does to certificates given under that section
premise text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate issued under section 305 at any time before the commencing time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to apply the Act to certificates issued under section 305 in the same way as it does to certificates given under that section
premise text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate given under that section at or after the commencing time.
conclusion text: ...in the same way as it does to a certificate issued under section 305 at any time before the commencing time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

31 Amendments of the Safety, Rehabilitation and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
note: Amendments of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 apply to certain individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.80
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Amendments of the Safety, Rehabilitation and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Amendment of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
note: Amends Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 regarding former certificates and documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.80
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-32-norm

33 Former members or staff members become permanent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
note: Former members or staff become permanent employees for the purposes of Superannuation Acts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Former members or staff members become permanent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide permanent employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Warrants or writs etc. may continue to be executed
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
note: Authority continues to be executable after commencement time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.82
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Warrants or writs etc. may continue to be executed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Authority remains valid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Regulations dealing with matters of a transitional or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
note: Governor-General may make regulations on transitional or saving matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000.pdf, p.82
asserts: australian-federal-police-legislation-amendment-act-2000-sch-3-sec-35-norm