Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1989
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 4 of 1990
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to criminal matters, to repeal the Commonwealth Prisoners Act 1967, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-3-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Amends Section 3 of the Principal Act to include a reference to a fine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Section 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a fine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: refers to
logic summary: References a fine
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Inserts 'Australian Capital Territory Executive' into subsection (1) of section 3b. Definitions and explanations of terms used in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Section 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inserts
logic summary: Insertion obligation
premise text: Section 3b of the Principal Act is amended.
conclusion text: the Australian Capital Territory Executive is inserted into subsection (1) of section 3b.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definitions and explanations of terms used in the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies expressions into plural or singular
premise text: In this Part, expressions in the plural do not imply that expressions in the singular do not include the plural.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Section 17a of the Principal Act is amended to reduce imprisonment for certain federal offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Section 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imprisonment obligation reduced for certain federal offences.
premise text: Section 17a of the Principal Act is amended to reduce imprisonment for certain federal offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between convictions and imprisonment.
premise text: the court convicting the person must not, unless in the opinion of the court there are exceptional circumstances that warrant it, pass a sentence of imprisonment for that offence or any of those offences.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of convictions and imprisonment.
premise text: For the purpose only, under subsection (lA), of aggregating the value of property or money to which federal offences relate, a federal offence of which a person has not been convicted but which a court, with the consent of the person charged, has taken into account in passing sentence on the person for another federal offence, is to be treated as if it were a federal offence of which the person was convicted.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of convictions and imprisonment through aggregation.
premise text: This section applies subject to any contrary intention in the law creating the offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-7-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imprisonment obligation reduced for certain federal offences.
premise text: Where a person is convicted of one or more federal offences relating to property, money or both, whose total value does not exceed $2,000; and the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: The Attorney-General must direct that a person be released from prison on parole at the end of the non-parole period. Court must direct when each federal sentence commences. Court must fix single non-parole period in respect of all federal sentences the person is to serve or complete. The offender must be of good behaviour and not violate any law during the licence period. Court must state reasons for not fixing non-parole period or making recognizance release order.
description: Reasons for decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Section 8
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The Attorney-General must direct that a person be released from prison on parole.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information about the commencement of sentences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The offender must be of good behaviour.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: The licence period is a subclass of the supervision period.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to state reasons
conclusion text: STATE REASONS
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-8-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to cause reasons to be entered in court records
conclusion text: ENTER REASONS IN COURT RECORDS
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Amendments to Section 19b of the Principal Act regarding federal offences and convictions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Section 10
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to amend Section 19b.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Amendments to Section 20 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to amend Section 20 of the Principal Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Amendments to subsections of Section 20a of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Section 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to amend subsections of Section 20a
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: A court is required to pass another sentence or make another order before passing a first-mentioned sentence or order in respect of a person convicted by that court for a federal offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Section 13
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
logic summary: The law requires a court to pass another sentence or make another order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Amends Section 20AC of the Principal Act to replace 'offence against the law of the Commonwealth' with 'federal offence'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-14-norm

15 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
has part: 15(1) Section 15
has part: 15(2) Section 15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.38

15(1) Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 Section 15
note: A person must be brought before a magistrate if arrested when the court is not sitting. Court must obtain and consider reports of psychiatrists with experience in diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1) Section 15
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be brought before a magistrate.
premise text: The court is not sitting.
conclusion text: A person must be brought before a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must obtain and consider reports.
premise text: Court is required to take action.
conclusion text: Reports of psychiatrists are considered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 Section 15
note: Court must obtain and consider reports of psychiatrists with experience in diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2) Section 15
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must obtain and consider reports.
premise text: Court is required to make a hospital order.
conclusion text: Reports of psychiatrists with experience in diagnosis and treatment of mental illness must be obtained and considered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider reports.
premise text: Court is required to make a hospital order.
conclusion text: Reports of psychiatrists with experience in diagnosis and treatment of mental illness must be considered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court may obtain other relevant information.
premise text: Court is required to make a hospital order.
conclusion text: Other relevant information may be obtained and considered by the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court may obtain other relevant information.
premise text: Court is required to make a hospital order.
conclusion text: Other relevant information may be obtained and considered by the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must obtain and consider reports of other person if released into care.
premise text: Person has been released into care under section 20BR.
conclusion text: Reports of the other person in charge must be obtained and considered by the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Repeals certain offences against Commonwealth laws and substitutes with federal offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Section 16
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Removes obligation to prosecute certain Commonwealth offences.
premise text: Section 21aa of the Principal Act is amended...
conclusion text: ...a federal offence or federal offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Removes obligation to prosecute certain external Territory offences.
premise text: ...and substituting the following paragraph: '(b) the document contains a list of other federal offences, or offences against the law of an external Territory that is prescribed for the purposes of this section, which the person convicted is believed to have committed';
conclusion text: ...offences against the law of an external Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-16-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Removes obligation to prosecute certain federal offence-related matters.
premise text: ...and omitting from subparagraph (1) (c) (iii) 'offences against the laws of the Commonwealth' and substituting 'federal offences';
conclusion text: ...federal offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

17 Section 17
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
note: A person is not to be imprisoned for a failure to pay an amount required to be paid under an order made under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-17-logic-ltl-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Section 17
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a person fails to pay, they are not imprisoned.
premise text: Failure to pay
conclusion text: No imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-17-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The obligation is until the payment is made.
premise text: Payment not made
conclusion text: No imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

18 Section 18
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
note: Amends Section 21D of the Principal Act to preserve operation of other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-18-norm

19 Section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
note: Director of Public Prosecutions may appeal against reductions where promised co-operation with law enforcement agencies refused
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to cooperate with law enforcement agencies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies offenses into federal and non-federal categories
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
note: Amendment of definition of Commonwealth authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-20-norm

21 Section 21
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
note: Law enforcement agencies must assess prospective employees or members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Section 21
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assessment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Section 22
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: Defines employee for law enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-22-norm

23 Section 23
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Defines terms for Division 1 of Part 1, including commencing day and Principal Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-23-norm

24 Section 24
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Licence granted under section 19a continues in force with effect from commencing day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-24-norm

25 Section 25
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Continues to apply in relation to a person and sentence after revocation or cancellation of licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Section 25
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
logic summary: Obligation to apply
premise text: Licence revoked or cancelled
conclusion text: Principal Act applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
has part: 26(1) Section 26
has part: 26(2) Section 26
has part: 26(3) Section 26
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60

26(1) Section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Section 26
note: Continuation of existing order under amended Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(1) Section 26
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
logic summary: Continues the effect of an existing order
premise text: (existing order)
conclusion text: (new order)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Section 26
note: Orders for multiple offenses treated as a single order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(2) Section 26
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: treats-as
logic summary: Treats multiple orders as a single order
premise text: (orders made under paragraph 20 (1) (b))
conclusion text: (single order)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between multiple orders
premise text: (commencing day)
conclusion text: (expiration of periods of imprisonment required to be served under those first-mentioned orders)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies the release of a person upon completion of all sentences
premise text: (orders made under paragraph 20 (1) (b))
conclusion text: (release of a person)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the treatment of multiple orders to all relevant parties
premise text: (orders made under paragraph 20 (1) (b))
conclusion text: (all relevant parties)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the treatment of multiple orders as a single order by AI systems
premise text: (orders made under paragraph 20 (1) (b))
conclusion text: (single order)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

26(3) Section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-3
part of: 26 Section 26
note: Continuation of Section 20B of the Principal Act for A.C.T. purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(3) Section 26
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continuation of a provision
premise text: Section 20B continues to apply
conclusion text: Section 26(3) obliges the State to continue Section 20B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commencement and continuation
premise text: Commencement occurs before continuation
conclusion text: Section 26(3) obliges the State to continue Section 20B during the period of commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commencement and continuation
premise text: Commencement occurs before continuation
conclusion text: Section 26(3) obliges the State to continue Section 20B during the period of commencement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commencement and continuation
premise text: Commencement occurs before continuation
conclusion text: Section 26(3) obliges the State to continue Section 20B during the period of commencement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-26-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commencement and continuation
premise text: Commencement occurs before continuation
conclusion text: Section 26(3) obliges the State to continue Section 20B during the period of commencement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Section 27
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Treats repealed section as if not repealed for certain purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-27-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
has part: 28(1) Section 28
has part: 28(2) Section 28
has part: 28(3) Section 28
has part: 28(5) Section 28
has part: 28(6) Section 28
has part: 28(7) Section 28
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60

28(1) Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 Section 28
note: Application for non-parole period in life imprisonment sentence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(1) Section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May apply for non-parole period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
part of: 28 Section 28
note: Non-parole period commences on sentence commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(2) Section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Sentence commencement implies non-parole period start
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if a non-parole period is fixed...
conclusion text: That non-parole period is to be treated as having commenced on the commencement of the sentence of life imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: Non-parole period starts at sentence commencement
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if a non-parole period is fixed...
conclusion text: That non-parole period is to be treated as having commenced on the commencement of the sentence of life imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: Non-parole period starts at sentence commencement
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if a non-parole period is fixed...
conclusion text: That non-parole period is to be treated as having commenced on the commencement of the sentence of life imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Non-parole period implication
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if a non-parole period is fixed...
conclusion text: That non-parole period is to be treated as having commenced on the commencement of the sentence of life imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Non-parole period classification
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if a non-parole period is fixed...
conclusion text: The person concerned is not eligible to be released on parole before the commencing day
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-3
part of: 28 Section 28
note: Non-parole period treatment for fixed sentences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(3) Section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Fixed non-parole period implies eligibility on parole
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection (4), if a non-parole period is fixed...
conclusion text: ...that non-parole period is to be treated as having commenced...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Non-parole period treatment implies parole eligibility
premise text: (4) Where, in relation to any sentence of imprisonment referred to in paragraph (1) (b)...
conclusion text: ...that non-parole period is to be treated as having commenced...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: And
logic summary: Multiple conditions for parole eligibility
premise text: (4) Where, in relation to any sentence of imprisonment referred to in paragraph (1) (b)...
conclusion text: ...that non-parole period is to be treated as having commenced...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Non-parole period treatment implies parole eligibility on parole day
premise text: (4) Where, in relation to any sentence of imprisonment referred to in paragraph (1) (b)...
conclusion text: ...that non-parole period is not to be such as would render the person eligible...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(5) Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-5
part of: 28 Section 28
note: Non-parole period fixed under Part IB of the Principal Act as amended by this Act must be taken into account for the purposes of the Principal Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(5) Section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(6) Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-6
part of: 28 Section 28
note: Court may fix non-parole period despite deportation risk
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(6) Section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May impose obligation on courts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(7) Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-7
part of: 28 Section 28
note: Court may deal with application regardless of its current constitution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(7) Section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-28-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Court's power to deal with application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
note: Repeal of Commonwealth Prisoners Act 1967
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Legislative repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Section 30
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
has part: 30(1) Section 30
has part: 30(2) Section 30
has part: 30(3) Section 30
has part: 30(4) Section 30
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.62

30(1) Section 30
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 Section 30
note: Treats a lesser term of imprisonment as a non-parole period for all purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) Section 30
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) Section 30
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 Section 30
note: Aggregate period of imprisonment must be treated as a single non-parole period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) Section 30
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Aggregate period is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(3) Section 30
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-3
part of: 30 Section 30
note: Adjusts sentence length for application of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(3) Section 30
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: More than 3 years but less than 10 years
premise text: (3) Where the term of a sentence...
conclusion text: is to be taken to be more than 3 years but less than 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(4) Section 30
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-4
part of: 30 Section 30
note: Treats a purported minimum term of imprisonment fixed by State or Territory legislation as if it were a lesser term of imprisonment fixed by a court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(4) Section 30
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Section 31
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Parole order continues in force with effect from commencing day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Section 31
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Parole order continues in force.
premise text: Section 5 of the Commonwealth Prisoners Act 1967
conclusion text: Section 31
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
note: Continues to apply in relation to that person and that sentence, on and after the commencing day, until that sentence is fully served.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Section 32
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues to apply
logic summary: Obligation continues to apply
premise text: The Act had not been repealed and the amendments made by Division 1 of this Part had not been made.
conclusion text: The Act applies in relation to that person and that sentence, on and after the commencing day, until that sentence is fully served.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for parole order cancellation
premise text: The parole order was cancelled before the commencing day.
conclusion text: The Act continues to apply in relation to that person and that sentence, on and after the commencing day, until that sentence is fully served.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-32-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for parole order cancellation
premise text: The parole order was cancelled before the commencing day.
conclusion text: The Act continues to apply in relation to that person and that sentence, on and after the commencing day, until that sentence is fully served.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Section 33
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
note: No effect on State/Territory laws regarding remission of non-parole periods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No effect on State/Territory laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Section 34
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
note: Amendment of Acts set out in Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-34-norm

35 Section 35
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) Section 35
has part: 35(2) Section 35
has part: 35(3) Section 35
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64

35(1) Section 35
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Section 35
note: Relocates and renumbers certain sections of the Principal Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-35-ss-1-norm

35(2) Section 35
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Section 35
note: Relocation and renumbering of section 21AA of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relocation to be within the same temporal interval
premise text: Relocation must occur after section 16b
conclusion text: Relocation occurs within the same temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(3) Section 35
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-3
part of: 35 Section 35
note: Renumbering of sections in the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-35-ss-3-norm

36 Section 36
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
note: Defines Principal Act as Cash Transaction Reports Act 1988.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-36-norm

37 Section 37
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
note: Amends definitions in Section 3 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-37-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Section 37
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to amend definitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-37-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a class of persons declared acceptable referees
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Section 38
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
note: Application process for identifying cash dealers, including verification procedures and reporting requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to carry out verification procedures and report information.
premise text: The applicant undertakes to carry out the verification procedures under subsection 20(8)
conclusion text: The applicant must carry out the verification procedures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to report information obtained by the applicant.
premise text: The applicant undertakes to report under section 16 in relation to information obtained by the applicant as a result of carrying out the procedures mentioned in paragraph (a)
conclusion text: The applicant must report the information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to give written reports on compliance with this Act.
premise text: The applicant undertakes to give the Director, in respect of such periods as are determined by the Director, written reports on the applicant's compliance with this Act.
conclusion text: The applicant must provide written reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class
logic summary: Class definition for identifying cash dealers.
premise text: An application must be accompanied by a written undertaking in the approved form, by which the applicant undertakes...
conclusion text: The applicant is an identifying cash dealer if they meet the requirements.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting compliance with this Act.
premise text: The Director may, by notice in the Gazette, declare the applicant to be an identifying cash dealer if satisfied that such a declaration would not be inconsistent with the objects of this Act.
conclusion text: The declaration is effective between certain dates.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-38-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission for the Director to revoke or suspend declarations.
premise text: The Director may, by notice in the Gazette, revoke a declaration, nor suspend it for a specified period or until a specified act is done...
conclusion text: The Director has permission to take certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Section 39
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
note: Cash dealer must comply with notice given by authorised officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-39-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Section 39
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Section 40
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
has part: 40(1) Section 40
has part: 40(2) Section 40
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.66

40(1) Section 40
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
part of: 40 Section 40
note: Amend Section 15 of the Principal Act to include transfers in Australian currency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(1) Section 40
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Section 40
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Section 40
note: Section 15 of the Principal Act is amended regarding report requirements for currency transfers.
description: report under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(2) Section 40
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reporting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Section 41
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
note: Blocking of accounts with unverified signatories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-41-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Section 41
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Account blocking is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Section 42
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
note: Account should not be blocked if unverified signatory provides verification statement or identification reference.
description: Verification statement or identification reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Section 42
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to not block the account.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Section 43
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Amends Section 20 of the Principal Act regarding account statements and verification procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Section 43
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the cash dealer to carry out verification procedures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Section 44
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
note: Making false or misleading statements in identification references is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Section 44
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading statements
premise text: An acceptable referee, or any other person, must not make a statement in an identification reference that is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: Making such statements is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Obligation to provide accurate information
premise text: An acceptable referee, or any other person, must not omit from an identification reference any matter or thing without which the reference is misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to provide accurate information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-44-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Obligation to provide accurate information
premise text: An acceptable referee, or any other person, must not knowingly or recklessly omit from an identification reference any matter or thing without which the reference is misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to provide accurate information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Section 45
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
note: Cash dealer must retain records for 7 years after account closure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Section 45
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Cash dealer must retain records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Section 46
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: Amendment of section 25 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-46-norm

47 Section 47
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
note: Failure to provide information
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-47-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47 Section 47
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
conclusion text: Failure to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Section 48
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
note: Refusal or failure to communicate information and comply with notices is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits refusal or failure to communicate information and comply with notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Section 49
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
note: Prohibition on misleading cash dealers during verification procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-49-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Section 49
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Section 50
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
has part: 50(1) Section 50
has part: 50(2) Section 50
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.71

50(1) Section 50
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Section 50
note: Amend Section 33 of the Principal Act to include Australian currency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Section 50
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to amend Section 33
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Section 50
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
part of: 50 Section 50
note: Examination of persons and goods for currency reporting purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on leaving Australia without declared currency.
premise text: Section 33 of the Principal Act is amended to prohibit leaving Australia without declared currency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-50-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of places for examination purposes.
premise text: The definition of 'prescribed place' is inserted into subsection (10) of the amended section.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Section 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
note: Resisting, obstructing or preventing arrest without warrant is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of resisting, obstructing or preventing arrest without warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Section 52
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
note: Director may engage consultants under written agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-52-norm

53 Section 53
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
note: Regulations may amend certain Schedules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-53-norm

54 Section 54
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-54-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-54-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Classifies Principal Act as a class
premise text: Principal Act means the National Crime Authority Act 1984
conclusion text: Principal Act is a class
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55 Section 55
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
note: Amends subsections (1), (3) and (4) of Section 31 of the Principal Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-55-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-55-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55 Section 55
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-1-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: No. 64, 1988.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-2-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: References previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-sec-3-2-norm