Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 1991
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 28 of 1991
description: An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and law enforcement matters, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-1-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
has part: 2(1) Section 2
has part: 2(2) Section 2
has part: 2(3) Section 2
has part: 2(4) Section 2
has part: 2(5) Section 2
has part: 2(6) Section 2
has part: 2(7) Section 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4

2(1) Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Section 2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on a specific day
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, this Act commences on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The Act begins on the specified day
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal overlap between sections
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, this Act commences on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: Section 2 overlaps with the Act's commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holds
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between sections
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, this Act commences on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: Section 2 holds with the Act's commencement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Defines a diffusion relationship between sections
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, this Act commences on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: Section 2 diffuses with the Act's commencement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
logic summary: Defines a cognitive relationship between sections
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, this Act commences on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: Section 2 is recognized by the Act's commencement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Section 2
note: Conditional commencement of certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-2-norm

2(3) Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Section 2
note: Conditional commencement of certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(4) Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-4
part of: 2 Section 2
note: Commencement of section 58 subject to proclamation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
premise text: Section 58 commences on a day
conclusion text: The day is to be fixed by proclamation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(5) Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-5
part of: 2 Section 2
note: Conditional commencement of section 58
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(6) Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-6
part of: 2 Section 2
note: Conditional commencement of subsection 74(2) and Part 2 of Schedule 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(7) Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-7
part of: 2 Section 2
note: Conditional commencement of subsection 74(3) and Part 3 of Schedule 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-2-ss-7-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines Principal Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Amendments to Section 8 of the Principal Act regarding provision of services and regulatory services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Section 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Add "and" at end of paragraph (1) and insert new paragraph (bb)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-5-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Section 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Re-numbering of subsection (4A) in Section 17 of the Principal Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Re-numbering as a duty
premise text: Duty to re-number subsections
conclusion text: Re-numbering subsection (4A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Remuneration and allowances for Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Section 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to determine remuneration and allowances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Amendment of subsection (3) in Section 20 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-8-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Commissioner may grant leave of absence to Deputy Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Section 9
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting leave is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Amendment of section 22 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-10-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Members may be directed to perform certain staff member functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Members are obligated to perform certain staff member functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Amends section 26D of the Principal Act regarding continuous service upon re-appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-12-norm

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: A person appointed as a Deputy Commissioner must take or make the prescribed oath or affirmation before starting to perform their duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Section 13
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Amendment of Section 34 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-14-norm

15 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Appointment continuity upon transfer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Section 15
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Appointment continuity is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Amends Section 36 of the Principal Act regarding a person's appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-16-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Section 16
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17 Section 17
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
note: A person must be treated as having held a position during a promotion period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Section 17
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be treated as having held a position
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
logic summary: Position transfer timing
premise text: (8) Where a person's promotion is cancelled:...
conclusion text: ...within a rank or at a level that is the same as, or equivalent to...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Position transfer implication
premise text: (8) Where a person's promotion is cancelled:...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner must transfer the person to a position of member or staff member, as the case requires,
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISTRIBUTES
logic summary: Position transfer distribution
premise text: (8A) The Commissioner must create a position, or make a new determination under section 24, if it is necessary to do so in order to comply with paragraph (8) (b) in a particular case.
conclusion text: ...within a rank or at a level that is the same as, or equivalent to...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-17-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ENTAILS
logic summary: Position transfer entailment
premise text: (8A) The Commissioner must create a position, or make a new determination under section 24, if it is necessary to do so in order to comply with paragraph (8) (b) in a particular case.
conclusion text: ...within a rank or at a level that is the same as, or equivalent to...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Section 18
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
note: Review by Merit Protection and Review Agency in certain other cases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-18-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Insertion
logic summary: Inserts a new section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassHierarchy
logic summary: Defines class hierarchy for Agency and commencing day
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-18-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the Commissioner to appoint a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
note: Amendment of Section 40 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-19-norm

20 Section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-20-norm

21 Section 21
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
note: Amends definition of "investigating officer" and adds "Comptroller-General of Customs"
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Section 21
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds new clause to definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Section 22
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: Amendment of Section 26 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Section 22
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Section 23
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Amendment of Section 27 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-23-norm

24 Section 24
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-24-norm

25 Section 25
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Pecuniary penalties for natural persons and bodies corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits pecuniary penalties for natural persons and bodies corporate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Maximum pecuniary penalty for offences created by an instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Section 26
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to specify penalties for offences created by an instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

27 Section 27
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Provision does not prevent use of other available defences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-27-norm

28 Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: Amendment of Section 10 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-28-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

29 Section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
note: Prohibits obstructing public officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-29-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Section 29
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Section 30
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Amends definition of law enforcement agency and spent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-30-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Section 30
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: amend
logic summary: Changes legal definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Section 31
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: None
conclusion text: Principal Act is defined as the Crimes (Protection of Aircraft) Act 1973 Long title
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
note: Repeals title and substitutes new title for Principal Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Section 32
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: repeal
logic summary: Repeals the title of the Principal Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Section 33
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
note: Amends Section 3 of the Principal Act regarding Convention definitions and Protocol
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-33-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-33-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-33-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies Convention and Protocol terms
premise text: Convention and Protocol definitions
conclusion text: Classification applied
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-33-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines obligations for ratification and accession
premise text: Ratification and accession requirements
conclusion text: Obligations defined
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Section 34
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
note: Approved accession to Protocol
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Approval
logic summary: Legislative approval of Australia's accession
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Section 35
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
note: Using devices, substances or weapons to perform acts of violence at airports is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-35-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Section 35
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of devices, substances or weapons to perform acts of violence at airports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Section 36
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
note: Amends Section 22 of the Principal Act regarding judicial notice of Convention and Protocol
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Section 36
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on courts to take judicial notice
premise text: Courts must take judicial notice of Convention and Protocol
conclusion text: Courts are obligated to acknowledge Convention and Protocol
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap between Convention entry into force and Protocol entry into force
premise text: Convention entered into force on January 28, 1973
conclusion text: Protocol entered into force after Convention
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Describes recurring relation between Convention and Protocol
premise text: Convention and Protocol are related concepts
conclusion text: Convention and Protocol repeat in relation to each other
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes diffusion of knowledge about Convention and Protocol
premise text: Courts must take judicial notice of Convention and Protocol
conclusion text: Knowledge about Convention and Protocol diffuses through courts
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-36-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Describes recognition of Convention and Protocol by courts
premise text: Courts take judicial notice of Convention and Protocol
conclusion text: Courts recognize Convention and Protocol
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Section 37
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
note: Amendment of Section 23 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-37-norm

38 Section 38
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
note: Amend Schedule to Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-38-norm

39 Section 39
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
note: Amendment of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-39-norm

40 Section 40
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-40-norm

41 Section 41
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
note: Amends definition of Associate Director
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Section 41
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inserts
logic summary: Inserts new definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines Associate Director
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Section 42
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
note: Associate Director of Public Prosecutions added to Section 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Section 42
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding a new role
premise text: Section 5 is amended
conclusion text: Associate Director of Public Prosecutions added
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Section 43
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Director may decline to carry on proceeding further
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-43-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Director has permission to decline carrying on proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-43-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Proceedings in a State or Territory are included in the definition of 'State or Territory proceedings'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

44 Section 44
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
note: Amendment of Section 13 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-44-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Section 44
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45 Section 45
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
note: Appointment requirements for Associate Director
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Section 45
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on appointment of Associate Director
premise text: A person must not be appointed as the Associate Director unless...
conclusion text: ...he or she is a legal practitioner and has been a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on appointment of Associate Director after turning 65
premise text: A person who has turned 65 must not be appointed as the Associate Director...
conclusion text: ...and a person must not be appointed for a period that ends after the day on which the person will turn 65.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Term of office for Associate Director
premise text: The Associate Director holds office for the period, not longer than 7 years...
conclusion text: ...specified in the instrument of appointment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Associate Director has powers and functions of Director
premise text: The Associate Director has all the powers and functions of the Director...
conclusion text: ...except the Director's powers of delegation under section 31.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-45-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Associate Director holds office on terms and conditions determined by Governor-General
premise text: The Associate Director holds office on such terms and conditions...
conclusion text: ...in respect of matters not provided for by this Act as are determined by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Section 46
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: Associate Director's remuneration and allowances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-46-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Section 46
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Associate Director must be paid remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Section 47
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
note: Grant of leave of absence from duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Director's obligation to grant leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

48 Section 48
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
note: Cannot undertake other work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits undertaking other work
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Section 49
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
note: Associate Director must not perform certain actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Associate Director has a duty to refrain from certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Section 50
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
note: Amendments to Section 23 of the Principal Act regarding disclosure of interests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-50-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Section 50
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Disclosure of interests is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Section 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
note: Associate Director must give written notice of pecuniary interests to AttorneyGeneral
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Section 52
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
note: Amends Section 25 of the Principal Act by adding "or the Associate Director" after "Director"
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-52-norm

53 Section 53
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
note: Associate Director's duties and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Section 53
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Associate Director's duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Attorney-General's discretion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-53-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Associate Director's acting period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

54 Section 54
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
note: The Attorney-General may appoint a person to act in the office of Associate Director.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Section 54
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Attorney-General may appoint a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Section 55
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
note: Amends Section 27 of the Principal Act regarding Director's powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-55-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-55-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Director has power to exercise Secretary's powers.
premise text: Section 27 of the Principal Act is amended:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-55-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Powers relate to branch during specified period.
premise text: (2) The Director has all the powers of, or exercisable by, a Secretary...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56 Section 56
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
note: Amendment of Section 31 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-56-norm

57 Section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-57-norm

58 Section 58
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
has part: 58(1) Section 58
has part: 58(2) Section 58
has part: 58(3) Section 58
has part: 58(4) Section 58
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.20

58(1) Section 58
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Section 58
note: Amend definition of State and Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(1) Section 58
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Section 58
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Section 58
note: Continuation of Principal Act in relation to certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(2) Section 58
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to apply
premise text: (a) an order or warrant under the Principal Act was in force
conclusion text: The Principal Act continues to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to apply
premise text: (b) an application for such an order or warrant had been made but not finally dealt with
conclusion text: The Principal Act continues to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to apply
premise text: (c) the order, warrant or application
conclusion text: The order, warrant or application continues to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to apply
premise text: (d) the offence, or alleged or suspected offence
conclusion text: The offence, or alleged or suspected offence continues to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to apply
premise text: (e) any person convicted of the offence, or any person alleged to have committed it or suspected of having committed it
conclusion text: Any person convicted of the offence, or any person alleged to have committed it or suspected of having committed it continues to be affected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(3) Section 58
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-3
part of: 58 Section 58
note: Continuation of Part VI of the Principal Act after commencing day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: commencing day
conclusion text: on and after
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(4) Section 58
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-4
part of: 58 Section 58
note: Definition of "commencing day"
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-58-ss-4-norm

59 Section 59
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
note: Amendment of Section 50 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-59-norm

60 Section 60
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
note: Definition of Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-60-norm

61 Section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
has part: 61(1) Section 61
has part: 61(2) Section 61
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.21

61(1) Section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Section 61
note: Amend Section 5 of the Principal Act regarding permitted purpose and record keeping.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(1) Section 61
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Section 61
note: Amends definitions of "certifying officer", "chief officer", "eligible authority", "officer", and "prescribed investigation" to exclude references to "Drug"
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(2) Section 61
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes references to 'Drug' in definitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-61-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Definition
logic summary: Defines new terms for the Crime Commission
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Section 62
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
note: Amendment of Section 6A of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-62-norm

63 Section 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
note: Telecommunications cannot be intercepted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-63-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-63-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits interception of telecommunications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Section 64
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
note: Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of interception
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-64-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Section 64
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reporting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Section 65
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65
note: Amendment of Section 17 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-65-norm

66 Section 66
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66
note: Agency may apply for warrant after amendment of Section 35
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Agency obligation to apply for warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Section 67
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
note: Amendment of Section 39 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-67-norm

68 Section 68
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
note: Managing Director of carrier must be informed of issue or revocation of certain warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-68-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Section 68
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Section 69
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
note: Amends Section 60 of the Principal Act regarding prescribed officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-69-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-69-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Section 69
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-69-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a subclass of certifying officers.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Section 70
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
note: Amendment of Section 73 of the Principal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-70-norm

71 Section 71
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
note: Commonwealth agencies must report to Minister about applications and warrants under Parts IV and VI.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subclass of Commonwealth agencies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Section 72
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72
note: Amends Section 94 of the Principal Act by changing the time period from "2 months" to "3 months".
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-72-norm

73 Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73
has part: 73(1) Section 73
has part: 73(2) Section 73
has part: 73(3) Section 73
has part: 73(4) Section 73
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23

73(1) Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Section 73
note: Continues effect of section 34 declaration on and after commencing day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(1) Section 73
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continues obligation
premise text: Section 34 declaration in force immediately before commencing day
conclusion text: Continues effect of section 34 declaration on and after commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on and after commencing day
logic summary: Temporal interval: on and after commencing day
premise text: Section 34 declaration in force immediately before commencing day
conclusion text: Continues effect of section 34 declaration on and after commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: continues obligation
logic summary: Continues obligation to have effect on and after commencing day
premise text: Section 34 declaration in force immediately before commencing day
conclusion text: Continues effect of section 34 declaration on and after commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses obligation to have effect on and after commencing day
premise text: Section 34 declaration in force immediately before commencing day
conclusion text: Continues effect of section 34 declaration on and after commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: continues obligation
logic summary: Continues obligation to have effect on and after commencing day
premise text: Section 34 declaration in force immediately before commencing day
conclusion text: Continues effect of section 34 declaration on and after commencing day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Section 73
note: References to State Drug Crime Commission of New South Wales are updated to refer to New South Wales Crime Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(2) Section 73
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: update
logic summary: Update references to State Drug Crime Commission of New South Wales.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(3) Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-3
part of: 73 Section 73
note: Revocation of declaration under subsection (1) is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-3-norm

73(4) Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-4
part of: 73 Section 73
note: Definitions for section 73
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-73-ss-4-norm

74 Section 74
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74
has part: 74(1) Section 74
has part: 74(2) Section 74
has part: 74(3) Section 74
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.24

74(1) Section 74
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Section 74
note: Amendment of specified Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-74-ss-1-norm

74(2) Section 74
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Section 74
note: Amendment of Act specified in Part 2 of Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-74-ss-2-norm

74(3) Section 74
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
part of: 74 Section 74
note: The Act specified in Part 3 of Schedule 2 is amended as set out in that Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Act to be amended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 September 1971, to deal with such unlawful acts of violence at
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
note: Supplements the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-23-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-23-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 September 1971, to deal with such unlawful acts of violence at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Unlawful use of devices, substances or weapons is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-1-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Insert words after paragraph 1 in Article 1 of the Convention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Insertion obligation
premise text: Words shall be inserted after the words "paragraph 1":
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Protocol subject to ratification by signatory States.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-2
note: Any State that is not a Contracting State to the Convention may ratify this Protocol if at the same time it ratifies or accedes to the Convention in accordance with Article 15 thereof.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to ratify the Protocol
premise text: The State may ratify the Protocol.
conclusion text: The State is permitted to ratify the Protocol.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MeetsAt
logic summary: Temporal relationship between ratification and accession
premise text: The State ratifies or accedes to the Convention at the same time.
conclusion text: The State meets at the same time as the Convention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Ratification of Protocol implies accession to Convention
premise text: If the State ratifies the Protocol, then it accedes to the Convention.
conclusion text: The State accedes to the Convention if it ratifies the Protocol.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Ratification of Protocol spreads to accession to Convention
premise text: The State's ratification of the Protocol diffuses to its accession to the Convention.
conclusion text: The State's accession to the Convention is diffused from its ratification of the Protocol.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: State recognizes its own ratification and accession
premise text: The State recognizes its own ratification and accession.
conclusion text: The State is recognized as having ratified the Protocol and acceded to the Convention.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Designation of Depositaries for Instruments of Ratification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
note: Protocol enters into force after deposit of tenth instrument of ratification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: when
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Deposit of tenth instrument of ratification
conclusion text: Protocol enters into force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: after
logic summary: Temporal relation between deposits
premise text: Deposit of tenth instrument of ratification after deposit of ninth instrument of ratification
conclusion text: Protocol enters into force on thirtieth day after deposit of tenth instrument of ratification
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation with temporal interval
premise text: Deposit of tenth instrument of ratification implies protocol enters into force on thirtieth day
conclusion text: Protocol enters into force on thirtieth day after deposit of tenth instrument of ratification
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: when
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to other states
premise text: Deposit of tenth instrument of ratification implies protocol enters into force for other states on thirtieth day after deposit of their instruments of ratification
conclusion text: Protocol enters into force for each state on thirtieth day after deposit of its instrument of ratification
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: when
logic summary: Cognitive processing of obligation with temporal interval
premise text: Deposit of tenth instrument of ratification triggers protocol entry into force on thirtieth day
conclusion text: Protocol enters into force on thirtieth day after deposit of tenth instrument of ratification
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-3
note: Registration of Protocol upon entry into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-3-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-3
note: Non-signatory States can access the Protocol after it has entered into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to access
premise text: State can access Protocol
conclusion text: Protocol is accessible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-4
note: Any State that is not a Contracting State to the Convention may accede to this Protocol if at the same time it ratifies or accedes to the Convention in accordance with Article 15 thereof.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-2
note: Deposits of accession instruments trigger obligation to take effect after a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to take effect after deposit
premise text: Deposit of accession instruments
conclusion text: Accession takes effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-4
note: Denunciation of the Protocol
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to denounce
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-5
note: Denunciation takes effect six months after notification is received by the Depositaries.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-5-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-3
note: Denunciation of this Protocol does not affect the Convention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Protocol denunciation affects Convention
premise text: Denunciation of this Protocol
conclusion text: Denunciation of the Convention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Denunciation of the Convention also denounces this Protocol.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits denunciation of the Convention without denouncing this Protocol.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-5
note: States must inform other States of signature and ratification dates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-1-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: States must inform other States.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-6
note: Notification of States on Protocol entry into force date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-1-sec-2-6-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Amendment reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-2-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: List of previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: list
logic summary: Enumerates amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: No previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: None
logic summary: Establishes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: References previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: No previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Previous amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-1991-sch-2-sec-7-norm