1 At the end of section 3ZL
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1(4) At the end of section 3ZL
has part: 1(5) At the end of section 3ZL
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
note: Crime scene must be present.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Crime scene must be present.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 1

1(4) At the end of section 3ZL
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Right to use provisions of Part 1D as authority for taking fingerprints
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1 At the end of section 3ZL

1(5) At the end of section 3ZL
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Defines terms for prescribed and serious offenders.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 1 At the end of section 3ZL

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms with obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(5) At the end of section 3ZL

10 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
note: Defines DNA database system
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During DNA database system definition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 10, subsection 2

11 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
note: Exercise of a function includes performing a duty.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exercise of a function includes performing a duty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of exercise of a function
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Exercise of a function includes perform a duty.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for functions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Subsection 23WA(1)

12 Subsection 23WA(1) (at the end of paragraph (c) of the
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Add “or video recordings” to the definition of forensic material.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
note: Defines member of opposite sex for a person.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

13 Subsection 23WA(1) (at the end of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Granting permission for taking samples for identity establishment
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

14 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Inserts a power, authority or duty into the function.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
note: Offender's conviction offence related to proposed forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offender's conviction offence for which the offender was convicted and to which an application for an order authorising a forensic procedure relates.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Offender's conviction offence is related to proposed forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offender's conviction offence for which the offender was convicted and to which an application for an order authorising a forensic procedure relates.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Offender's conviction offence is related to proposed forensic procedure and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Subsection 23WA(1)

15 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Insertion of phrase after 'effect of'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

16 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (e), (f) and (h) of the
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Insertion of gender identity into definition of intimate forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
note: A person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence if they meet certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: A person serving a sentence that overlaps with the sentence imposed for a federal offence is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWithSentence
premise text: (f) is subject to an order made under Division 9 of Part 1B;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: isUnderSentence
premise text: (a) is serving a sentence in a prison (including a gaol, lock-up or other place of detention); or (b) is serving a sentence of a kind, or subject to an order of a kind, provided for in subsection 20AB(1) as a sentence or order that may be passed or made by a court, under that section, in respect of a person convicted of a federal offence;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person released under a parole order made under subsection 19AL(1) or (2) is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: isReleasedUnderParoleOrder
premise text: (c) is released under a parole order made under subsection 19AL(1) or (2);

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person convicted and conditionally released as provided for in subsection 20(1) is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: isSubjectToConditionalRelease
premise text: (g) is convicted and conditionally released as provided for in subsection 20(1), either: (i) in the case of paragraph 20(1)(a)—without sentence being passed; or (ii) in the case of paragraph 20(1)(b)—after sentence has been passed.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: A person serving a sentence that is traced by the sentence imposed for a federal offence is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
modality: LTL
operator: isTracedBySentence
premise text: (f) is subject to an order made under Division 9 of Part 1B;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a term into a definition
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (e), (f) and (h) of the

17 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (h) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Insert 'or video recording' after 'photograph'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of investigating constable)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Definition of investigating constable modified to include forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to modify definitions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

19 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Definition of 'judge' inserted.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts a definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy for 'judge'.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

2 After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) After section 4
has part: 2(2) After section 4
has part: 2(3) After section 4
has part: 2(4) After section 4
has part: 2(5) After section 4
has part: 2(6) After section 4
has part: 2(7) After section 4
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

2(1) After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Rules for functions and powers conferred on certain persons The Governor-General may make arrangements with the Governor of a State (excluding the Northern Territory)
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After section 4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for search warrants and arrest warrants
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for search warrants and arrest warrants
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Authorized to issue search warrants, or warrants of arrest

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to perform duty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Confers power
modality: Deontic
operator: confer
premise text: Function or power is conferred on one or more of the following persons

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission or obligation to make arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Combines rules with definitions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Combines rules for functions and powers conferred on certain persons with definitions of Magistrate and Justice of the Peace
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: Rules for functions and powers conferred on one or more of the following persons: (a) a State or Territory judge; (b) a magistrate; (c) a Justice of the Peace or other person

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for functions and powers conferred on certain persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for functions and powers conferred on certain persons
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: Function or power is neither judicial nor incidental to a judicial function or power

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(1) After section 4

2(2) After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Function or power is personal and not as a court or member of a court.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After section 4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Function or power is during a personal capacity.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Function or power is not as a court or member of a court.
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Function or power is personal.
modality: Deontic
operator: personal
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Function or power is during a personal capacity.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.

2(3) After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Protection and immunity provided after section 4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After section 4

2(4) After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Protection and immunity for judges and magistrates performing conferred functions or exercising conferred powers.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After section 4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, during that time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between functions and powers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, as, or as a member of, a court...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, must be granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity for judges and magistrates
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, during that time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between functions and powers
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...

2(5) After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Protection and immunity for persons performing functions and powers as part of employment with a State or Territory court.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After section 4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Same protection and immunity as employment with a State or Territory court
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Person performing function or exercising power

2(6) After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Applicability of section to laws made before, on or after commencement
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After section 4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...A law of the Commonwealth relating to criminal matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies regardless of law's enactment time
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
premise text: (6) This section applies...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(6) After section 4

2(7) After section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
note: Reference to Commonwealth law on criminal matters includes reference to this Act.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After section 4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(7) After section 4

20 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
note: Inserts section 3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.20
note: Obstructing forensic procedure is an offence.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is guilty of an offence if the person obstructs, hinders or resists a person carrying out a forensic procedure in accordance with this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Preventing the carrying out of forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

21 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
note: Defines 'member of the same sex as a person'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

22 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (d), (e) and (g) of the
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
note: Insertion of gender identity into definition of non-intimate forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 22(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 22(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

22(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22
note: Carry out forensic procedure on serious offender or prescribed offender without permission. Inform the offender of certain details about forensic procedure Offender must give informed consent to forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of serious offenders and prescribed offenders.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure on serious offender or prescribed offender.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform the offender
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Informed consent given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide informed consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Offender consents after request and information provided.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

22(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22
note: Authorisation required for forensic procedures on suspects Offender must be allowed to communicate with legal practitioner in private unless constable suspects reasonable grounds for evidence destruction.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must allow the offender to communicate with the legal practitioner in private.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Offender must be allowed to communicate with legal practitioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Section 22(2) states that the constable must allow the offender to communicate...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must not request the offender to consent to the forensic procedure unless there are reasonable grounds for evidence destruction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable may request offender to consent to forensic procedure unless reasonable grounds for evidence destruction exist.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must not
premise text: Section 23XWH states that a constable may request the offender to consent...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offender has a right to communicate with the legal practitioner in private.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Offender has right to communicate with legal practitioner in private.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Section 22(2) states that the constable must allow the offender to communicate...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must not request the offender to consent to the forensic procedure unless it is justified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable may request consent for forensic procedure unless justified.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must not
premise text: Section 23XWH states that a constable may request the offender to consent...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable may suspect that there are reasonable grounds for evidence destruction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Constable may suspect reasonable grounds for evidence destruction based on suspicion.
modality: Epistemic
operator: May suspect
premise text: Section 22(2) states that the constable suspects on reasonable grounds...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must be satisfied on a recurring trace that the request for consent is justified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Constable must be satisfied on balance of probabilities before requesting consent.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Section 23XWI states that the constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

22(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22
note: Forensic procedures may be carried out on volunteers with authorization.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorization
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out on...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for authorization
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out on...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to carry out forensic procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Informed consent for forensic procedures
modality: Diffusion
operator: Informed Consent
premise text: 23XWG Informed consent to forensic procedures

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for authorization
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out on...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (d), (e) and (g) of the

23 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (g) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
note: Insert 'or video recording' after 'photograph'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

23XL Taking of hair samples
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
note: Authorisation for taking hair samples from suspects
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xl
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has permission to take hair samples
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XL Taking of hair samples

23YN Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
has part: 23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yn
schema version: 2

23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Retention of electronic recordings for purposes other than investigative or evidentiary.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings

23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Protection against unauthorized access or use of electronic recordings
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access or use
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

23YO Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(2) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(3) Disclosure of information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo
schema version: 2

23YO(1) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45
note: Disclosing unauthorized information is an offence.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recklessness occurs at time of disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between events.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (c) the person is reckless as to any such disclosure;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person has access to any information stored on the DNA database system or to any other information revealed by a forensic procedure carried out on a suspect, offender or volunteer;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless disclosure of information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the person is reckless as to any such disclosure;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is diffused through the network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information through a network.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) the person has access to any information stored on the DNA database system or to any other information revealed by a forensic procedure carried out on a suspect, offender or volunteer;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information

23YO(2) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45
note: Disclosure of information for specific purposes
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) A person may only disclose...

23YO(3) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information

23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp
schema version: 2

23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
note: Taking, retention and use of forensic material is authorized by law.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization for taking, retention and use of forensic material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization

23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
note: Retention and use of forensic material for Commonwealth purposes.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows retention and use of forensic material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material

23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
note: Retention and use of forensic material from a State or Territory law is permitted for Commonwealth purposes.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to retain and use forensic material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material

23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
has part: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yq
schema version: 2

23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to a constable or staff member.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers

23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to staff member.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation occurs during the term of office of the Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Delegation occurs during the term of office of the Commissioner.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to staff member.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to staff member.
modality: Argumentation
operator: may
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: staff member has the meaning it has in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Staff member has the meaning it has in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation occurs through the Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Delegation occurs through the Commissioner.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers

24 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
note: Definition of offender
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 24(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 24(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
description: record of order, date, and time
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24
note: Constable must make a record of order, date, and time when made. Ensure tape recording of information and offender responses.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

24(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
description: written record, copy of record
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24
note: Constable must inform serious offender about non-intimate forensic procedure. Constable must ensure a written record is made and a copy is available to the serious offender.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inform serious offender
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Constable has taken into account the matters set out in section 23XWL.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable must ensure a written record is made and a copy is available to the serious offender.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

24(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24
note: Constable must inform serious offender of non-consensual forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inform serious offender of non-consensual forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Constable has authority to order forensic procedure.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

24A Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of order)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
note: Definition of order
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24a
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'order'
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24A Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of order)

25 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
note: Defines participating jurisdiction
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
note: Definition of prescribed offence
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(5) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(6) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(7) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(8) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: Order to permit forensic procedure in prison or detention place Serious offender must consent to intimate forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offender must permit procedure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide permission
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Judge or magistrate orders

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

26(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: Offender must be provided with a copy of the record. Authorized applicant may apply for order to carry out non-intimate forensic procedure on child or incapable person who is a serious offender. Defines Division 6 person under Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized applicant may apply for order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines Division 6 person
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies Division 6 person
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has class

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

26(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
description: affidavit
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: Affidavit required for application under subsections (1) or (2) Order to permit forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit is required
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offender must permit procedure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Judge/Magistrate orders

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

26(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: Authorized applicant may apply for order to take fingerprints of a child or incapable person. Refusal to permit forensic procedure without reasonable excuse is an offence.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 12 months imprisonment for refusal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between refusal and imprisonment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Refusal precedes imprisonment.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized applicant may apply for order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing forensic procedure without reasonable excuse.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Offender bears evidential burden in relation to exception of reasonable excuse.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imprisonment for 12 months for refusing forensic procedure without reasonable excuse.
modality: Deontic
operator: Imprisonment
premise text: Offender is guilty of an offence if refuses or fails to permit procedure.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment follows refusal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Refusal implies guilt and imprisonment.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: Offender's refusal implies guilt.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

26(5) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: Authorized applicant may make application to judge or magistrate at a later time.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: May

26(6) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: A judge or magistrate may order the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division if satisfied that the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to order carrying out of forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: None

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(6) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

26(7) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: Consider seriousness of circumstances and potential assistance to law enforcement when making an order.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Check if the carrying out of the forensic procedure could assist law enforcement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: carry out
premise text: (c) whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure could assist law enforcement, whether Federal or otherwise;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence by the offender;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider the seriousness of circumstances and potential assistance to law enforcement.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: (a) whether this Part would authorise the forensic procedure to be carried out in the absence of the order;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determine if the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: justified
premise text: (d) whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Check if this Part would authorise the forensic procedure to be carried out in the absence of the order.
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: (a) whether this Part would authorise the forensic procedure to be carried out in the absence of the order;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: null
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Check if the carrying out of the forensic procedure is part of a recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: carry out
premise text: (c) whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure could assist law enforcement, whether Federal or otherwise;

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(7) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

26(8) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
note: Disclose forensic analysis results until appeal period expires or conviction is quashed.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Results disclosure overlaps with appeal period and conviction quashing.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Disclosure is implied to be conditional on appeal period expiration or conviction quashing.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of forensic analysis results.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Maintains confidentiality until appeal period expires or conviction is quashed.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Confidentiality

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclose results until later of appeal period or conviction being quashed.
modality: LTL
operator: Until

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(8) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'prescribed offence'
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the term 'prescribed offence' as a legal concept
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Subsection 23WA(1)

27 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
note: Definition of prescribed offender
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to use it correctly
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 Subsection 23WA(1)

28 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
note: Definition of prison medical officer
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 Subsection 23WA(1)

29 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
note: Definition of recognised transgender person
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

29A Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of relevant offence)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
note: Definition of relevant offence
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-29a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a
schema version: 2

3 Section 15FA
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
note: Repeal a section
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
note: Defines responsible person in relation to DNA database system.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.30
note: DNA database system information may be used for criminal investigation or other purposes.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Purpose restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: >

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Provides a formal definition for the term.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Subsection 23WA(1)

31 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
note: Definition of serious offence
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Subsection 23WA(1)

32 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
note: Definition of serious offender
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 32(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 32(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

32(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32
note: Authorized applicant may apply to magistrate for order.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

32(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32
note: Magistrate may order retention of forensic material under certain conditions. Magistrate must consider certain factors when determining whether to make an order under this section.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has an obligation to order retention of forensic material under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the best interests of the child or incapable person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence; and ...whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Magistrate must consider multiple factors when determining whether to make an order.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

32(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32
note: Specify requirements for forensic procedure or retention of forensic material Specifies retention period for forensic material
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Subsection 23WA(1)

33 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of tape recording)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
note: Repeals and substitutes a definition for 'tape recording'.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

34 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
note: Defines transgender person for Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Failure to comply with provisions of Part or Division 8A
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During forensic procedure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: During forensic procedure
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: there has been a breach...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Breach of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: breach
premise text: (b) there has been a breach...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During forensic procedure
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During forensic procedure
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

35 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
note: Defines volunteer
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(5) At the end of section 23WA
has part: 36(6) At the end of section 23WA
has part: 36(7) At the end of section 23WA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.36
note: Ensure destruction of forensic material after conviction quashed.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must ensure...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner has an obligation...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to destroy forensic material
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

36(5) At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
note: Destroying forensic material requires destroying means of identification.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 36 At the end of section 23WA

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Destroy means of identification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to destroy forensic material
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Forensic procedure used

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to destroy forensic material
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of destruction as obligation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: Definition of destruction

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(5) At the end of section 23WA

36(6) At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
note: Definition of transgender person
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 36 At the end of section 23WA

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of transgender person
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Transgender person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Person

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recognised transgender person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Transgender person

36(7) At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
note: Definition of gender identity for transgender persons
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 36 At the end of section 23WA

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of gender identity for transgender persons
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member of the opposite sex
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Transgender person

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member of the same sex
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Transgender person

36A Section 23WB
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
note: Insert ‘, offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36a
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36A Section 23WB

36B Subsection 23WB(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
note: Insertion of additional terms in a legal provision.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36b
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36B Subsection 23WB(4)

37 Division 2 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
note: Repeal and substitute heading with new text
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action taken
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal and substitute
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Provision text

38 Division 3 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.38
note: Definition of suspects index
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

39 At the end of subsection 23WI(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
note: Person on whom forensic procedure is not a child or incapable person.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 At the end of subsection 23WI(1)

4 Part 1D (simplified outline)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out in accordance with rules and procedures set out in Division 6.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forensic procedures must be carried out.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Part 1D (simplified outline)

40 After paragraph 23WJ(1)(i)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
note: Inserts section 23XZ effect into the text
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 40(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

40(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.40
note: Matching of DNA profiles is prohibited if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

40(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.40
note: Permissible matching of DNA profiles
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

41 At the end of subsection 23WJ(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
note: Information from forensic material analysis may be placed on the DNA database system.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 At the end of subsection 23WJ(1)

41A Subsection 23WJ(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
note: Omit 'the taking of a hand print, finger print, foot print or toe print' and substitute 'a non-intimate forensic procedure'.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41a
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking of certain prints
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

42 Division 4 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 42(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 42(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 42(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
schema version: 2

42(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
note: Failure to destroy forensic material when required results in an offence.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits recording or retention of forensic material when required to be destroyed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

42(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
note: Ensure removal of identifying information from DNA database system after end of identifying period.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure removal of identifying information.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

42(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
note: Ensure removal of identifying information from DNA database after pardon or acquittal.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to remove identifying information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

42(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
note: DNA profile retention period
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Identifying information must be retained
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must retain DNA profiles for specified periods
modality: Deontic
operator: retain
premise text: DNA profile placed on database system

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Retention period applies to DNA profiles
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: DNA profile has a retention period
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: DNA profile is placed on database system

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

43 Division 5 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Paragraph 23WT(3)(g)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
note: Substitute 'reasons' for 'reason'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

44 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
schema version: 2

45 Subsection 23WX(6)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(6) Subsection 23WX(6)
has part: 45(6A) Subsection 23WX(6)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

45(6) Subsection 23WX(6)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
note: Suspect's right to address the magistrate and cross-examine witnesses.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Subsection 23WX(6)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to address the magistrate and cross-examine witnesses.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: (6) The suspect or his or her representative:

45(6A) Subsection 23WX(6)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
note: Magistrate cannot give leave unless substantial reasons exist for witness call or cross-examination.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Subsection 23WX(6)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving leave without substantial reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

46 Division 6 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

46 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
note: Disclose information to suspects, offenders, volunteers, and victims under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A duty to disclose information exists.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Act requires disclosure of certain information.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permission to disclose information exists.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

47 Section 23XL
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 Subsections 23XM(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Modify subsections 23XM(1) and (2)
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

48 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
schema version: 2

49 Subsection 23XM(3) (table item 8, column 2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Insert 'or a video recording' after 'photograph'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.9
note: Defines AFP function
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
note: Obligation to report serious offenders
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information on serious offenders
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Section 5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFP function means...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 23WA(1)

50 Subsection 23XM(3) (table items 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15,
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'yes (medical practitioner)' and substitute 'no'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

50 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
note: Destroy forensic material in participating jurisdictions.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to destroy forensic material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'yes (medical practitioner)'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

51 Subsection 23XM(3) (table item 14, column 3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Replace 'constable' with 'appropriately qualified person'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

52 Subsection 23XM(3) (table item 15, column 2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Insert 'or a video recording' after 'photograph'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

53 After subsection 23XM(3) (before the table)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Allow self-sampling under supervision.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits self-sampling
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 After subsection 23XM(3) (before the table)

54 At the end of section 23XO
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Use reasonable force to enable a forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Use reasonable force to enable the forensic procedure.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: A person is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 At the end of section 23XO

54A Subsection 23XP(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'the taking of a hand print, finger print, foot print or toe print' and substitute 'a non-intimate forensic procedure'.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54a
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking of certain prints
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

55 After section 23XW in Division 6 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 After Division 6 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.20
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

57 Paragraph 23XX(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.33
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Paragraph 23XX(1)(a)

58 Paragraph 23XX(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.33
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

58A Paragraph 23XX(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58a
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58A Paragraph 23XX(3)(a)

58B Subsection 23XX(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58b
schema version: 2

58C Paragraph 23XX(5)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58c
schema version: 2

58D Paragraph 23XX(5)(g)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Replace 'suspects' with 'persons'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58d
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58D Paragraph 23XX(5)(g)

58E Sections 23XY and 23YA
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58e
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58E Sections 23XY and 23YA

59 At the end of paragraph 23YC(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Omit 'is destroyed' and substitute with 'obtained as a result of the carrying out...'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destruction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of authorised applicant)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
note: Defines authorized applicant for forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(2) Section 6
has part: 6(3) Section 6
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6(2) Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
note: Offence for reckless matching of DNA profiles
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Section 6

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless matching of DNA profiles
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person is guilty of an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes the matching that is not permitted by this Part of a DNA profile on an index of the DNA database system with a DNA profile on the same or another index of the DNA database system; and (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person is guilty of an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes the matching that is not permitted by this Part of a DNA profile on an index of the DNA database system with a DNA profile on the same or another index of the DNA database system; and

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Section 6

6(3) Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
note: Exemption from offense for administering DNA database system
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Section 6

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts conduct from offense for administering DNA database system
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for an existing one
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of authorised applicant)

60 At the end of section 23YC
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
note: Forensic material must be destroyed after a specified period.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-60-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

61 Subsection 23YD(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
note: Substitute Divisions 6A and 6B for section 23YQ
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-61-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

62 At the end of subsection 23YD(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
note: Add “unless a warrant for apprehension of the suspect has been issued”.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 At the end of subsection 23YD(2)

63 Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(4) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(5) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(6) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(7) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(8) Subsection 23YD(4)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

63(4) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
note: Destroy forensic material within 12 months after warrant lapse or apprehension.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence classification
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to destroy forensic material
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of destruction obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Must
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(4) Subsection 23YD(4)

63(5) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
note: Magistrate may extend retention period for forensic material under special reasons.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal extension of retention period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Extension
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI application of retention period extension
modality: CogAI
operator: Extension
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend retention period
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of retention period extension
modality: Diffusion
operator: Extension
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal extension of retention period
modality: LTL
operator: Extension
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(5) Subsection 23YD(4)

63(6) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
note: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person or his or her legal representative or interview friend (if any) has been given the opportunity to speak to or make a submission to the magistrate concerning the extension.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) A magistrate to whom an application is made under subsection (5) is not to extend the period unless: (a) the person from whom the forensic material was taken has been notified by the applicant for the extension that the application has been made; and

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(6) Subsection 23YD(4)

63(7) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
note: Extension of forensic material may be given on more than one occasion.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)

63(8) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
note: Notify responsible person of DNA database system extension
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence involvement
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Notification diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.

64 At the end of Division 8 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-64-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

65 After Division 8 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-65-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

66 Subsection 23YE(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
note: Insert 'or offender' after 'suspect'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-66-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Subsection 23YE(1)

67 Subsection 23YE(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
note: Insert 'or offender's' after 'suspect's'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67 Subsection 23YE(1)

68 Paragraphs 23YE(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
note: Insert 'or offender' after 'suspect'
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Paragraphs 23YE(2)(a) and (b)

69 After paragraph 23YE(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
note: Inform suspect or offender in a language they can understand
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform suspect or offender in a language they can understand
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 After paragraph 23YE(2)(b)

7 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
note: Definition of Commissioner
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

70 Subsection 23YE(2)
type: Concept
description: Interview friend or legal representative
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
note: Informed of matter in a language they can communicate with reasonable fluency
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70 Subsection 23YE(2)

71 Section 23YF
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Insert ‘, offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71 Section 23YF

72 Paragraph 23YF(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Insertion of additional terms in a paragraph
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 Paragraph 23YF(2)(a)

73 Section 23YG
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Insert ‘, offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73 Section 23YG

74 Paragraph 23YG(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Insertion of additional terms in a sentence.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-74-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Paragraph 23YG(1)(a)

75 Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
description: True
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Material must be provided within 7 days after existence or request.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Material must be provided within 7 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75 Subsection 23YG(2)

75A Subsection 23YG(2) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Substitute section numbers
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75a
schema version: 2

76 Section 23YH
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
note: Insert ‘offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’ twice.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Section 23YH

77 At the end of Division 9 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-77-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

78 Divisions 10 and 11 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
note: Repeal Divisions
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

79 Division 12 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
note: Renumber as Division 10 of Part 1D.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-79-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
schema version: 2

8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 8(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 8(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
note: Defines corresponding law in section 23YUA.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

8(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
note: Section applies regardless of when Commonwealth law made
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

8(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
note: Applicability of section to laws made before, on or after commencement
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Law made before, on or after commencement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to specified laws
modality: Deontic
operator: applicableTo
premise text: Function or power conferred by law

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

8(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
note: Reference to Commonwealth law includes reference to this Act.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of references
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Reference to Commonwealth law is a subclass of reference to this Act
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

80 After paragraph 23YU(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
note: Prohibition on breath analysis or breath test without limiting paragraph (a)
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-80-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

81 After Division 10 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-81-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
schema version: 2

81A Section 23YT
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
note: Repeal a section
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-81a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81a
schema version: 2

82 Division 13 of Part 1D
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
note: Renumber as Division 12 of Part 1D.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-82-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
schema version: 2

83 After paragraph 23YV(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
note: Inserts provisions for oversight and accountability mechanisms, disparities between regimes, and issues related to privacy or civil liberties.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-83-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
schema version: 2

84 Subsection 23YV(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
note: Modify anniversary reference in subsection 23YV(1)
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-84-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Change text
modality: Deontic
operator: Modify

85 Subsection 23YV(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
note: Omit specific phrases from definition of independent review
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-85-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting phrases from definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

86 At the end of section 23YV
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
note: Minister must cause a further independent review within 2 years if report identifies inadequacies.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-86-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to cause a further review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

9 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
note: Defines 'destroy' for subsection (5)
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 3(1) (definition of foreign restraining order)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
note: Definition of foreign restraining order
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: foreign restraining order means an order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 3(1) (definition of foreign restraining order)

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Citation provision
modality: Deontic
operator: may be cited

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
has part: 2(4) Commencement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 34(7)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
note: Omit 'a restraining order', substitute 'an order'.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
note: Commences on a specific day after Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision commences on that day.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts at a specified time.
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of Schedule 1 (except items 2 and 3)
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

2(4) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1 items
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in Schedules
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 At the end of subsection 34(7)
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
note: Prohibit disposal or other handling of specified property
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1914, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 22 of 2001
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU