Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 22 of 2001
description: An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1914, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may be cited
logic summary: Citation provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
has part: 2(4) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commences on a specific day after Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts at a specified time.
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The provision commences on that day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Commences during a specific time period.
premise text: (1) Sections 1, 2 and 3, items 2 and 3 of Schedule 1, and Schedule 2 commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The commencement occurs during that day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of Schedule 1 (except items 2 and 3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-norm

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-norm

2(4) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-4
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1 items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-ss-4-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in Schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-norm

6 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-6-norm

1 At the end of section 3ZL
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
has part: 1(4) At the end of section 3ZL
has part: 1(5) At the end of section 3ZL
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6

1(4) At the end of section 3ZL
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-4
part of: 1 At the end of section 3ZL
note: Right to use provisions of Part 1D as authority for taking fingerprints
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-4-norm

1(5) At the end of section 3ZL
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-5
part of: 1 At the end of section 3ZL
note: Defines terms for prescribed and serious offenders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(5) At the end of section 3ZL
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines terms with obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
has part: 2(1) After section 4
has part: 2(2) After section 4
has part: 2(3) After section 4
has part: 2(4) After section 4
has part: 2(5) After section 4
has part: 2(6) After section 4
has part: 2(7) After section 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6

2(1) After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 After section 4
note: Rules for functions and powers conferred on certain persons The Governor-General may make arrangements with the Governor of a State (excluding the Northern Territory)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(1) After section 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: confer
logic summary: Confers power
premise text: Function or power is conferred on one or more of the following persons
conclusion text: Obligation to perform duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for search warrants and arrest warrants
premise text: Authorized to issue search warrants, or warrants of arrest
conclusion text: Temporal interval for search warrants and arrest warrants
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for functions and powers conferred on certain persons
premise text: Function or power is neither judicial nor incidental to a judicial function or power
conclusion text: Temporal interval for functions and powers conferred on certain persons
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Combines rules for functions and powers conferred on certain persons with definitions of Magistrate and Justice of the Peace
premise text: Rules for functions and powers conferred on one or more of the following persons: (a) a State or Territory judge; (b) a magistrate; (c) a Justice of the Peace or other person
conclusion text: Combines rules with definitions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission or obligation to make arrangements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 After section 4
note: Function or power is personal and not as a court or member of a court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Function or power is not as a court or member of a court.
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: personal
logic summary: Function or power is personal.
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Function or power is during a personal capacity.
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Function or power is during a personal capacity.
premise text: (2) The function or power is conferred on the person only in a personal capacity and not, in the case of a State or Territory judge or magistrate, as a court or a member of a court.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 After section 4
note: Protection and immunity provided after section 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-norm

2(4) After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-4
part of: 2 After section 4
note: Protection and immunity for judges and magistrates performing conferred functions or exercising conferred powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Protection and immunity
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, as, or as a member of, a court...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between functions and powers
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, during that time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between functions and powers
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, during that time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Protection and immunity for judges and magistrates
premise text: (4) A State or Territory judge or magistrate performing a conferred function, or exercising a conferred power...
conclusion text: has the same protection and immunity as if he or she were performing that function, or exercising that power, must be granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(5) After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-5
part of: 2 After section 4
note: Protection and immunity for persons performing functions and powers as part of employment with a State or Territory court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Protection and immunity
premise text: Person performing function or exercising power
conclusion text: Same protection and immunity as employment with a State or Territory court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2(6) After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-6
part of: 2 After section 4
note: Applicability of section to laws made before, on or after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(6) After section 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
logic summary: Section applies regardless of law's enactment time
premise text: (6) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...A law of the Commonwealth relating to criminal matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(7) After section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-7
part of: 2 After section 4
note: Reference to Commonwealth law on criminal matters includes reference to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-7-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(7) After section 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
has part: 8(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 8(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 8(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8

8(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Section applies regardless of when Commonwealth law made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-2-norm

8(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Applicability of section to laws made before, on or after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicableTo
logic summary: Section applies to specified laws
premise text: Function or power conferred by law
conclusion text: Law made before, on or after commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

8(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-4
part of: 8 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Reference to Commonwealth law includes reference to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of references
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Reference to Commonwealth law is a subclass of reference to this Act
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 15FA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-3-norm

4 Part 1D (simplified outline)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out in accordance with rules and procedures set out in Division 6.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Part 1D (simplified outline)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Forensic procedures must be carried out.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Defines AFP function
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: AFP function means...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-norm

6 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of authorised applicant)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Defines authorized applicant for forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of authorised applicant)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for an existing one
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Definition of Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
note: Defines corresponding law in section 23YUA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm

9 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Defines 'destroy' for subsection (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-9-norm

10 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
note: Defines DNA database system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Section 10, subsection 2
conclusion text: During DNA database system definition
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Exercise of a function includes performing a duty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of exercise of a function
premise text: Exercise of a function includes perform a duty.
conclusion text: Exercise of a function includes performing a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for functions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 23WA(1) (at the end of paragraph (c) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Add “or video recordings” to the definition of forensic material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-norm

13 Subsection 23WA(1) (at the end of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Granting permission for taking samples for identity establishment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Permission for forensic procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Inserts a power, authority or duty into the function.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Insertion of phrase after 'effect of'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (e), (f) and (h) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Insertion of gender identity into definition of intimate forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (e), (f) and (h) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a term into a definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (h) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Insert 'or video recording' after 'photograph'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of investigating constable)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Definition of investigating constable modified to include forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to modify definitions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Definition of 'judge' inserted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Inserts a definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy for 'judge'.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Inserts section 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-norm

12 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
note: Defines member of opposite sex for a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Defines 'member of the same sex as a person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (d), (e) and (g) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Insertion of gender identity into definition of non-intimate forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraphs (a), (d), (e) and (g) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (g) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Insert 'or video recording' after 'photograph'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23-norm

24 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Definition of offender
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-norm

24A Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of order)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24a
note: Definition of order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24A Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of order)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines the term 'order'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Defines participating jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-25-norm

26 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Definition of prescribed offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term 'prescribed offence'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the term 'prescribed offence' as a legal concept
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Definition of prescribed offender
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to use it correctly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-27-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Definition of prison medical officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Definition of recognised transgender person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-29-norm

29A Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of relevant offence)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a
note: Definition of relevant offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-29a-norm

14 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
note: Offender's conviction offence related to proposed forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Offender's conviction offence is related to proposed forensic procedure
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;
conclusion text: Offender's conviction offence for which the offender was convicted and to which an application for an order authorising a forensic procedure relates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Offender's conviction offence is related to proposed forensic procedure and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;
conclusion text: Offender's conviction offence for which the offender was convicted and to which an application for an order authorising a forensic procedure relates.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;
conclusion text: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;
conclusion text: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
premise text: (ii) any other indictable offence arising out of the same circumstances; or (iii) any other indictable offence in respect of which the evidence likely to be obtained as a result of a proposed forensic procedure carried out on the suspect is likely to have probative value;
conclusion text: Proposed forensic procedure is carried out during same circumstances as indictable offence and evidence likely to be obtained has probative value
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Defines responsible person in relation to DNA database system.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Provides a formal definition for the term.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Definition of serious offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Definition of serious offender
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of tape recording)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Repeals and substitutes a definition for 'tape recording'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-33-norm

34 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Defines transgender person for Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with legal obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Defines volunteer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-35-norm

36 At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
has part: 36(5) At the end of section 23WA
has part: 36(6) At the end of section 23WA
has part: 36(7) At the end of section 23WA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15

36(5) At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-5
part of: 36 At the end of section 23WA
note: Destroying forensic material requires destroying means of identification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(5) At the end of section 23WA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to destroy forensic material
premise text: Forensic procedure used
conclusion text: Destroy means of identification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of destruction as obligation
premise text: Definition of destruction
conclusion text: Obligation to destroy forensic material
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(6) At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-6
part of: 36 At the end of section 23WA
note: Definition of transgender person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-3

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of transgender person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Person
conclusion text: Transgender person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Subclass relationship
premise text: Transgender person
conclusion text: Recognised transgender person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(7) At the end of section 23WA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-7
part of: 36 At the end of section 23WA
note: Definition of gender identity for transgender persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of gender identity for transgender persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Transgender person
conclusion text: Member of the opposite sex
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Transgender person
conclusion text: Member of the same sex
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
note: A person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence if they meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-ltl-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isUnderSentence
logic summary: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
premise text: (a) is serving a sentence in a prison (including a gaol, lock-up or other place of detention); or (b) is serving a sentence of a kind, or subject to an order of a kind, provided for in subsection 20AB(1) as a sentence or order that may be passed or made by a court, under that section, in respect of a person convicted of a federal offence;
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isReleasedUnderParoleOrder
logic summary: A person released under a parole order made under subsection 19AL(1) or (2) is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
premise text: (c) is released under a parole order made under subsection 19AL(1) or (2);
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isSubjectToConditionalRelease
logic summary: A person convicted and conditionally released as provided for in subsection 20(1) is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
premise text: (g) is convicted and conditionally released as provided for in subsection 20(1), either: (i) in the case of paragraph 20(1)(a)—without sentence being passed; or (ii) in the case of paragraph 20(1)(b)—after sentence has been passed.
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWithSentence
logic summary: A person serving a sentence that overlaps with the sentence imposed for a federal offence is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
premise text: (f) is subject to an order made under Division 9 of Part 1B;
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: isTracedBySentence
logic summary: A person serving a sentence that is traced by the sentence imposed for a federal offence is also under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
premise text: (f) is subject to an order made under Division 9 of Part 1B;
conclusion text: The person is under sentence in relation to a prescribed offence or serious offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36A Section 23WB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36a
note: Insert ‘, offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36A Section 23WB
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36B Subsection 23WB(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36b
note: Insertion of additional terms in a legal provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36b-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36B Subsection 23WB(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

37 Division 2 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Repeal and substitute heading with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal and substitute
premise text: Provision text
conclusion text: Action taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Division 3 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-38-norm

39 At the end of subsection 23WI(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Person on whom forensic procedure is not a child or incapable person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-39-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 At the end of subsection 23WI(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40 After paragraph 23WJ(1)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Inserts section 23XZ effect into the text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-norm

41 At the end of subsection 23WJ(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Information from forensic material analysis may be placed on the DNA database system.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 At the end of subsection 23WJ(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41A Subsection 23WJ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41a
note: Omit 'the taking of a hand print, finger print, foot print or toe print' and substitute 'a non-intimate forensic procedure'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-41a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits taking of certain prints
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Division 4 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-norm

43 Division 5 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-43-norm

18 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm

44 Paragraph 23WT(3)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Substitute 'reasons' for 'reason'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-44-norm

45 Subsection 23WX(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
has part: 45(6) Subsection 23WX(6)
has part: 45(6A) Subsection 23WX(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18

45(6) Subsection 23WX(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-6
part of: 45 Subsection 23WX(6)
note: Suspect's right to address the magistrate and cross-examine witnesses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has right to address the magistrate and cross-examine witnesses.
premise text: (6) The suspect or his or her representative:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(6A) Subsection 23WX(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a
part of: 45 Subsection 23WX(6)
note: Magistrate cannot give leave unless substantial reasons exist for witness call or cross-examination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-45-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of giving leave without substantial reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Division 6 of Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-norm

47 Section 23XL
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-47-norm

23XL Taking of hair samples
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xl
note: Authorisation for taking hair samples from suspects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XL Taking of hair samples
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: State has permission to take hair samples
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Subsections 23XM(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Modify subsections 23XM(1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-48-norm

49 Subsection 23XM(3) (table item 8, column 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Insert 'or a video recording' after 'photograph'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-49-norm

50 Subsection 23XM(3) (table items 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Omit 'yes (medical practitioner)' and substitute 'no'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'yes (medical practitioner)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Subsection 23XM(3) (table item 14, column 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Replace 'constable' with 'appropriately qualified person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-51-norm

52 Subsection 23XM(3) (table item 15, column 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Insert 'or a video recording' after 'photograph'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-52-norm

53 After subsection 23XM(3) (before the table)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Allow self-sampling under supervision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 After subsection 23XM(3) (before the table)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits self-sampling
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 At the end of section 23XO
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Use reasonable force to enable a forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 At the end of section 23XO
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: A person is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure.
conclusion text: Use reasonable force to enable the forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54A Subsection 23XP(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54a
note: Omit 'the taking of a hand print, finger print, foot print or toe print' and substitute 'a non-intimate forensic procedure'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54a-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits taking of certain prints
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 After section 23XW in Division 6 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-55-norm

20 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
note: Obstructing forensic procedure is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Preventing the carrying out of forensic procedure
conclusion text: A person is guilty of an offence if the person obstructs, hinders or resists a person carrying out a forensic procedure in accordance with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 After Division 6 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-56-norm

22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
has part: 22(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 22(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 22(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22

22(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1
part of: 22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Carry out forensic procedure on serious offender or prescribed offender without permission. Inform the offender of certain details about forensic procedure Offender must give informed consent to forensic procedure.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure on serious offender or prescribed offender.
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure.
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure.
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure.
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of serious offenders and prescribed offenders.
premise text: (serious offender or prescribed offender is a suspect or a volunteer)
conclusion text: (person is not authorised to carry out forensic procedure under this Division)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform the offender
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide informed consent.
premise text: Offender consents after request and information provided.
conclusion text: Informed consent given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2
part of: 22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Authorisation required for forensic procedures on suspects Offender must be allowed to communicate with legal practitioner in private unless constable suspects reasonable grounds for evidence destruction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-7

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Requires authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Offender must be allowed to communicate with legal practitioner.
premise text: Section 22(2) states that the constable must allow the offender to communicate...
conclusion text: The constable must allow the offender to communicate with the legal practitioner in private.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must not
logic summary: Constable may request offender to consent to forensic procedure unless reasonable grounds for evidence destruction exist.
premise text: Section 23XWH states that a constable may request the offender to consent...
conclusion text: The constable must not request the offender to consent to the forensic procedure unless there are reasonable grounds for evidence destruction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: May suspect
logic summary: Constable may suspect reasonable grounds for evidence destruction based on suspicion.
premise text: Section 22(2) states that the constable suspects on reasonable grounds...
conclusion text: The constable may suspect that there are reasonable grounds for evidence destruction.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Constable must be satisfied on balance of probabilities before requesting consent.
premise text: Section 23XWI states that the constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...
conclusion text: The constable must be satisfied on a recurring trace that the request for consent is justified.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Offender has right to communicate with legal practitioner in private.
premise text: Section 22(2) states that the constable must allow the offender to communicate...
conclusion text: The offender has a right to communicate with the legal practitioner in private.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must not
logic summary: Constable may request consent for forensic procedure unless justified.
premise text: Section 23XWH states that a constable may request the offender to consent...
conclusion text: The constable must not request the offender to consent to the forensic procedure unless it is justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3
part of: 22 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Forensic procedures may be carried out on volunteers with authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to carry out forensic procedures
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out...
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorization
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out on...
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace for authorization
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out on...
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Informed Consent
logic summary: Informed consent for forensic procedures
premise text: 23XWG Informed consent to forensic procedures
conclusion text: ...who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for authorization
premise text: (3) A forensic procedure may be carried out on...
conclusion text: ...on a serious offender or prescribed offender who is a volunteer only if authorized by and in accordance with Division 6B.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
has part: 24(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 24(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 24(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24

24(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2
part of: 24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Constable must inform serious offender about non-intimate forensic procedure. Constable must ensure a written record is made and a copy is available to the serious offender.
description: written record, copy of record
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
premise text: Constable has taken into account the matters set out in section 23XWL.
conclusion text: Inform serious offender
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Constable must ensure a written record is made and a copy is available to the serious offender.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3
part of: 24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Constable must inform serious offender of non-consensual forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
premise text: Constable has authority to order forensic procedure.
conclusion text: Inform serious offender of non-consensual forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1
part of: 24 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Constable must make a record of order, date, and time when made. Ensure tape recording of information and offender responses.
description: record of order, date, and time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
has part: 26(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(5) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(6) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(7) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 26(8) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26

26(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Offender must be provided with a copy of the record. Authorized applicant may apply for order to carry out non-intimate forensic procedure on child or incapable person who is a serious offender. Defines Division 6 person under Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorized applicant may apply for order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines Division 6 person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has class
logic summary: Classifies Division 6 person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Order to permit forensic procedure in prison or detention place Serious offender must consent to intimate forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide permission
premise text: Judge or magistrate orders
conclusion text: Offender must permit procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Affidavit required for application under subsections (1) or (2) Order to permit forensic procedure
description: affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Judge/Magistrate orders
conclusion text: Offender must permit procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Authorized applicant may apply for order to take fingerprints of a child or incapable person. Refusal to permit forensic procedure without reasonable excuse is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorized applicant may apply for order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing forensic procedure without reasonable excuse.
premise text: Offender bears evidential burden in relation to exception of reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Refusal is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imprisonment
logic summary: Imprisonment for 12 months for refusing forensic procedure without reasonable excuse.
premise text: Offender is guilty of an offence if refuses or fails to permit procedure.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Refusal implies guilt and imprisonment.
premise text: Offender's refusal implies guilt.
conclusion text: Imprisonment follows refusal.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between refusal and imprisonment.
premise text: Refusal precedes imprisonment.
conclusion text: 12 months imprisonment for refusal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(5) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Authorized applicant may make application to judge or magistrate at a later time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(6) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: A judge or magistrate may order the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division if satisfied that the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(6) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to order carrying out of forensic procedure
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(7) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Consider seriousness of circumstances and potential assistance to law enforcement when making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(7) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the seriousness of circumstances and potential assistance to law enforcement.
premise text: (a) whether this Part would authorise the forensic procedure to be carried out in the absence of the order;
conclusion text: (b) the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence by the offender;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: justified
logic summary: Determine if the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
premise text: (d) whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
conclusion text: null
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: carry out
logic summary: Check if the carrying out of the forensic procedure could assist law enforcement.
premise text: (c) whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure could assist law enforcement, whether Federal or otherwise;
conclusion text: null
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: carry out
logic summary: Check if the carrying out of the forensic procedure is part of a recurring trace.
premise text: (c) whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure could assist law enforcement, whether Federal or otherwise;
conclusion text: null
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Check if this Part would authorise the forensic procedure to be carried out in the absence of the order.
premise text: (a) whether this Part would authorise the forensic procedure to be carried out in the absence of the order;
conclusion text: null
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(8) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8
part of: 26 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Disclose forensic analysis results until appeal period expires or conviction is quashed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(8) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of forensic analysis results.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Confidentiality
logic summary: Maintains confidentiality until appeal period expires or conviction is quashed.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Disclose results until later of appeal period or conviction being quashed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Disclosure is implied to be conditional on appeal period expiration or conviction quashing.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-26-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Results disclosure overlaps with appeal period and conviction quashing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm

30 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
note: DNA database system information may be used for criminal investigation or other purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Purpose restriction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
has part: 32(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 32(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 32(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32

32(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2
part of: 32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Magistrate may order retention of forensic material under certain conditions. Magistrate must consider certain factors when determining whether to make an order under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Magistrate has an obligation to order retention of forensic material under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must consider certain factors.
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...
conclusion text: ...the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must consider certain factors.
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...
conclusion text: ...the best interests of the child or incapable person;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must consider certain factors.
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...
conclusion text: ...whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Magistrate must consider multiple factors when determining whether to make an order.
premise text: (2) In determining whether to make an order under this section, the magistrate is to take into account...
conclusion text: ...the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence; and ...whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances;
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3
part of: 32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Specify requirements for forensic procedure or retention of forensic material Specifies retention period for forensic material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-3-norm

32(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1
part of: 32 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Authorized applicant may apply to magistrate for order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-32-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57 Paragraph 23XX(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-57-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Paragraph 23XX(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58 Paragraph 23XX(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58-norm

34 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
note: Failure to comply with provisions of Part or Division 8A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: breach
logic summary: Breach of obligation
premise text: (b) there has been a breach...
conclusion text: there has been a breach...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During forensic procedure
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During forensic procedure
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: During forensic procedure
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: During forensic procedure
premise text: (i) any provision of this Part in relation to a forensic...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a forensic procedure carried out at any time before or after...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A Paragraph 23XX(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58a
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58a-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58A Paragraph 23XX(3)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58B Subsection 23XX(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58b
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58b-norm

58C Paragraph 23XX(5)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58c
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58c-norm

58D Paragraph 23XX(5)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58d
note: Replace 'suspects' with 'persons'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58d-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58D Paragraph 23XX(5)(g)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58E Sections 23XY and 23YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58e
note: Replace 'suspect' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58e-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-58e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58E Sections 23XY and 23YA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

59 At the end of paragraph 23YC(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Omit 'is destroyed' and substitute with 'obtained as a result of the carrying out...'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destruction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 At the end of section 23YC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Forensic material must be destroyed after a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-60-norm

61 Subsection 23YD(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Substitute Divisions 6A and 6B for section 23YQ
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-61-norm

62 At the end of subsection 23YD(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Add “unless a warrant for apprehension of the suspect has been issued”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-62-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 At the end of subsection 23YD(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63 Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
has part: 63(4) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(5) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(6) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(7) Subsection 23YD(4)
has part: 63(8) Subsection 23YD(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35

63(4) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-4
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)
note: Destroy forensic material within 12 months after warrant lapse or apprehension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(4) Subsection 23YD(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to destroy forensic material
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Must
logic summary: Diffusion of destruction obligation
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Artificial intelligence classification
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued...
conclusion text: ...the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(5) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-5
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)
note: Magistrate may extend retention period for forensic material under special reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(5) Subsection 23YD(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend retention period
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Extension
logic summary: Temporal extension of retention period
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Extension
logic summary: Temporal extension of retention period
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Extension
logic summary: Diffusion of retention period extension
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Extension
logic summary: CogAI application of retention period extension
premise text: (5) A magistrate may...
conclusion text: ...the period for which forensic material may be retained under this section, if the magistrate is satisfied there are special reasons for doing so.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(6) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-6
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)
note: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(6) Subsection 23YD(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
premise text: (6) A magistrate to whom an application is made under subsection (5) is not to extend the period unless: (a) the person from whom the forensic material was taken has been notified by the applicant for the extension that the application has been made; and
conclusion text: the person or his or her legal representative or interview friend (if any) has been given the opportunity to speak to or make a submission to the magistrate concerning the extension.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(7) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-7
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)
note: Extension of forensic material may be given on more than one occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-7-norm

63(8) Subsection 23YD(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63-ss-8
part of: 63 Subsection 23YD(4)
note: Notify responsible person of DNA database system extension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure notification
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Notification diffusion
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-63-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence involvement
premise text: (8) The magistrate is to ensure that the responsible person in relation to the DNA database system is notified of any extension given under this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 At the end of Division 8 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-64-norm

36 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
note: Ensure destruction of forensic material after conviction quashed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Ensure action
conclusion text: The Commissioner must ensure...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to destroy forensic material
conclusion text: The Commissioner has an obligation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 After Division 8 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-65-norm

38 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
note: Definition of suspects index
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm

40 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
has part: 40(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 40(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.40

40(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3
part of: 40 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Permissible matching of DNA profiles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-norm

40(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1
part of: 40 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Matching of DNA profiles is prohibited if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
note: Crime scene must be present.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Crime scene must be present.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-2
note: Obligation to report serious offenders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Section 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information on serious offenders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
has part: 6(2) Section 6
has part: 6(3) Section 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41

6(2) Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2
part of: 6 Section 6
note: Offence for reckless matching of DNA profiles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Section 6
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless matching of DNA profiles
premise text: (2) A person is guilty of an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes the matching that is not permitted by this Part of a DNA profile on an index of the DNA database system with a DNA profile on the same or another index of the DNA database system; and (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct
premise text: (2) A person is guilty of an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes the matching that is not permitted by this Part of a DNA profile on an index of the DNA database system with a DNA profile on the same or another index of the DNA database system; and
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct
premise text: (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3
part of: 6 Section 6
note: Exemption from offense for administering DNA database system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts conduct from offense for administering DNA database system
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
has part: 42(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 42(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 42(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
has part: 42(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42

42(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Failure to destroy forensic material when required results in an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(1) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits recording or retention of forensic material when required to be destroyed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Ensure removal of identifying information from DNA database system after end of identifying period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Ensure removal of identifying information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: Ensure removal of identifying information from DNA database after pardon or acquittal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(3) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to remove identifying information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4
part of: 42 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
note: DNA profile retention period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(4) Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: retain
logic summary: Must retain DNA profiles for specified periods
premise text: DNA profile placed on database system
conclusion text: Identifying information must be retained
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: DNA profile has a retention period
premise text: DNA profile is placed on database system
conclusion text: Retention period applies to DNA profiles
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Subsection 23YE(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: Insert 'or offender' after 'suspect'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-66-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Subsection 23YE(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67 Subsection 23YE(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Insert 'or offender's' after 'suspect's'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-67-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Subsection 23YE(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

68 Paragraphs 23YE(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Insert 'or offender' after 'suspect'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-68-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Paragraphs 23YE(2)(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

69 After paragraph 23YE(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Inform suspect or offender in a language they can understand
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 After paragraph 23YE(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform suspect or offender in a language they can understand
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Subsection 23YE(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Informed of matter in a language they can communicate with reasonable fluency
description: Interview friend or legal representative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 Subsection 23YE(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm

71 Section 23YF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Insert ‘, offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Section 23YF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Paragraph 23YF(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Insertion of additional terms in a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Paragraph 23YF(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Section 23YG
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Insert ‘, offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73 Section 23YG
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Paragraph 23YG(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
note: Insertion of additional terms in a sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-74-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Paragraph 23YG(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

75 Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
note: Material must be provided within 7 days after existence or request.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75 Subsection 23YG(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Material must be provided within 7 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75A Subsection 23YG(2) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75a
note: Substitute section numbers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-75a-norm

76 Section 23YH
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
note: Insert ‘offender or volunteer’ after ‘suspect’ twice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Section 23YH
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 At the end of Division 9 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-77-norm

23YN Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yn
has part: 23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
has part: 23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44

23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-1
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings
note: Retention of electronic recordings for purposes other than investigative or evidentiary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-1-norm

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings
note: Protection against unauthorized access or use of electronic recordings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access or use
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YO Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo
has part: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(2) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(3) Disclosure of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45

23YO(1) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information
note: Disclosing unauthorized information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information.
premise text: (a) the person has access to any information stored on the DNA database system or to any other information revealed by a forensic procedure carried out on a suspect, offender or volunteer;
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless disclosure of information.
premise text: (c) the person is reckless as to any such disclosure;
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between events.
premise text: (c) the person is reckless as to any such disclosure;
conclusion text: Recklessness occurs at time of disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information through a network.
premise text: (a) the person has access to any information stored on the DNA database system or to any other information revealed by a forensic procedure carried out on a suspect, offender or volunteer;
conclusion text: Information is diffused through the network.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YO(2) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information
note: Disclosure of information for specific purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure of information
premise text: (2) A person may only disclose...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YO(3) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-3
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yo-ss-3-norm

46 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
note: Disclose information to suspects, offenders, volunteers, and victims under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
premise text: The Act requires disclosure of certain information.
conclusion text: A duty to disclose information exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to disclose information in certain circumstances
premise text: Disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
conclusion text: Permission to disclose information exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp
has part: 23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46

23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
note: Taking, retention and use of forensic material is authorized by law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Authorization for taking, retention and use of forensic material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
note: Retention and use of forensic material for Commonwealth purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows retention and use of forensic material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
note: Retention and use of forensic material from a State or Territory law is permitted for Commonwealth purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to retain and use forensic material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yq
has part: 23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
has part: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47

23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-1
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to a constable or staff member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-1-norm

23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to staff member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Staff member has the meaning it has in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)
conclusion text: staff member has the meaning it has in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Delegation occurs during the term of office of the Commissioner.
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)
conclusion text: Delegation occurs during the term of office of the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to staff member.
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)
conclusion text: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to staff member.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Delegation occurs through the Commissioner.
premise text: (2) In subsection (1)
conclusion text: Delegation occurs through the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Divisions 10 and 11 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
note: Repeal Divisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-78-norm

79 Division 12 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
note: Renumber as Division 10 of Part 1D.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-79-norm

80 After paragraph 23YU(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
note: Prohibition on breath analysis or breath test without limiting paragraph (a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-80-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 After Division 10 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-81-norm

48 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm

50 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
note: Destroy forensic material in participating jurisdictions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to destroy forensic material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A Section 23YT
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81a
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-81a-norm

82 Division 13 of Part 1D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
note: Renumber as Division 12 of Part 1D.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-82-norm

83 After paragraph 23YV(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
note: Inserts provisions for oversight and accountability mechanisms, disparities between regimes, and issues related to privacy or civil liberties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-83-norm

84 Subsection 23YV(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
note: Modify anniversary reference in subsection 23YV(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-84-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-84-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Modify
logic summary: Change text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Subsection 23YV(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
note: Omit specific phrases from definition of independent review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-85-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting phrases from definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 At the end of section 23YV
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
note: Minister must cause a further independent review within 2 years if report identifies inadequacies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-86-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to cause a further review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm

1 Subsection 3(1) (definition of foreign restraining order)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-2
note: Definition of foreign restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 3(1) (definition of foreign restraining order)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: foreign restraining order means an order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Applies to class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 34(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-2
note: Omit 'a restraining order', substitute 'an order'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-2-2-norm

3 At the end of subsection 34(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-2
note: Prohibit disposal or other handling of specified property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-amendment-forensic-procedures-act-2001-sch-2-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Direct prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed