1 Short Title
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.7
note: Cites this Act as the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Jan 1934 (s 3)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Seat of Government
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 Nov 1947
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 Nov 1947 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Conditional commencement of Judges' Pensions Act
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 Apr 1980 (s 2 and gaz
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

10 Oath of allegiance and office by Judge
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
note: Take oath of allegiance and office before proceeding to discharge duties.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10 Dec 1968 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Judges' remuneration
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-3
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Dec 1968 (s 2)

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Take oath of allegiance and office before proceeding to discharge duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

11 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.17
note: Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the Territory.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court

12 Jurisdiction in Chambers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.17
note: Jurisdiction of Supreme Court exercisable by one Judge may be exercised by the Judge sitting in Chambers.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to exercise jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: exercisable

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Jurisdiction in Chambers

13 Apr
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

13 Apr 1935
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Supreme Court Act 1945, Section 57
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-13-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-2
schema version: 2

14 Trial without jury
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Trial without jury
has part: 14(2) Trial without jury
has part: 14(3) Trial without jury
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1950
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-2
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

14 July 1955
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-3
schema version: 2

14 Aug 1956 (s 2 and
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Legislation history
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-4
schema version: 2

14 June
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-5
schema version: 2

14 June 1969 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Supreme Court Act 1971
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-6
schema version: 2

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-7
schema version: 2

14(1) Trial without jury
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
note: Trial without jury in Supreme Court suits
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Trial without jury

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide trial without jury
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) In every suit in the Supreme Court...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(1) Trial without jury

14(2) Trial without jury
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
note: The Supreme Court or Judge may order a trial with a jury if it appears just.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Trial without jury

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May order a trial with a jury.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(2) Trial without jury

14(3) Trial without jury
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
note: Supreme Court has jurisdiction to set aside a verdict or finding of a jury.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Trial without jury

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(3) Trial without jury

15 Costs
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) Costs
has part: 15(2) Costs
has part: 15(3) Costs
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15(1) Costs
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
note: Supreme Court has jurisdiction to award costs in all matters brought before the Court, including matters dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Costs

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supreme Court has jurisdiction to award costs.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(1) Costs

15(2) Costs
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
note: Court discretion to determine costs in Supreme Court proceedings.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Costs

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has power to decide on costs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(2) Costs

15(3) Costs
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
note: Nothing in this section alters the practice followed in criminal causes or matters.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Costs

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The practice would otherwise be followed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Practice is not altered
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Nothing in this section alters the practice

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(3) Costs

16 Service of writs out of the jurisdiction of the Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
note: Service of writs out of jurisdiction allowed
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Judges' Remuneration Act 1955
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-2
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to pay judges' remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

16 June
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-3
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Commencement of Sch 1 and 2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-4
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits service of writs out of jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Service of writs out of the jurisdiction of the Court

17 Law and equity to be concurrently administered
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
note: Law and equity shall be administered concurrently in Supreme Court cases.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-2
schema version: 2

17 Nov 1971 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1973, sections 6(2), (3) and 11(2)
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-3
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Law and equity to be concurrently administered

18 Equities of plaintiff
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
note: The Supreme Court shall give the same relief as the English Court of Chancery in a suit or proceeding for the like purpose.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18 June
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Conditional commencement of s 15 and 16
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
note: Schedule 1 of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1988
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-3
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Supreme Court has an obligation to provide the same relief as the English Court of Chancery.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Equities of plaintiff

19 Equities of defendant
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
note: The Supreme Court or Judge must give effect to equitable estates, rights, and grounds of relief claimed by the defendant.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19 Oct 1945 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Salaries (Statutory Offices) Adjustment Act
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-3
schema version: 2

19 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Sch 1: 31 Dec 1973 (s 2)
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-4
schema version: 2

19 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Amendment of Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Amendment Act 1976
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-5
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide effect to equitable estates, rights, and grounds of relief.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Equities of defendant

2 Dec 1981
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Dec 1988
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
note: Consequential Provisions
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

20 Counter claims and third parties
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Counter claims and third parties
has part: 20(2) Counter claims and third parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Amendment by Statute Law Revision Act 1973
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20 Mar
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-3
schema version: 2

20(1) Counter claims and third parties
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20
note: Granting of relief to defendants in equity and law
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Counter claims and third parties

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has power to claim relief
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1) Counter claims and third parties

20(2) Counter claims and third parties
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20
note: Every person served with notice is deemed a party to the cause.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Counter claims and third parties

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Deemed a party
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be a party
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Served with notice

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Counter claims and third parties

21 Equities appearing incidentally
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20
note: Notice of equitable estates and rights appearing incidentally in court proceedings.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

21 June
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Amendment of section 115 by Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 1) 1982
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-2
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval is defined
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval for amendment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Amendment occurred on June 21, 1981

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice of equitable estates and rights.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Equities appearing incidentally

22 Defence or stay instead of injunction or prohibition
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.21
note: No cause or proceeding can be restrained by prohibition or injunction.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22 May
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-2
schema version: 2

22 May 1959 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-3
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 intersects with other legislation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 overlaps with other legislation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Legislation often overlaps with other laws

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 requires the payment of judges' remuneration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 implies the payment of judges' remuneration
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Payment of judges' remuneration is implied by the legislation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI acknowledges the validity of Judges' Remuneration Act 1960
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 as a valid legislation
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: Artificial intelligence recognizes valid laws

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 obliges the State
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 has obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: State is obligated to pay judges' remuneration

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 spreads the obligation to pay judges' remuneration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 diffuses obligations to pay judges' remuneration
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Obligations are diffused through legislation

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1982
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-4
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

22 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1983
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-5
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No cause or proceeding can be restrained by prohibition or injunction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Defence or stay instead of injunction or prohibition

23 Common law and statutory rights and duties
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.21
note: Supreme Court or Judge must give effect to all legal claims and demands, estates, titles, rights, duties, obligations, and liabilities.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give effect to all legal claims and demands.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 Common law and statutory rights and duties

24 November 2009
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation and amendment information
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Determination of matter completely and finally
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
note: The Supreme Court must grant remedies in every cause or matter pending before the Court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-2
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Supreme Court must grant remedies.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Determination of matter completely and finally

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 24 November 2009.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text is a compilation of the law.

25 Rules of equity to prevail
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
note: Rules of equity prevail in conflicts with common law rules.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to follow equity rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Rules of equity to prevail

26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(1) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
has part: 26(2) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
has part: 26(3) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

26(1) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
note: Supreme Court may grant mandamus, injunctions or appoint receiver in certain cases.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(1) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers

26(2) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
note: Court may make order on terms and conditions it thinks just.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court can make order on terms and conditions it thinks just.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

26(3) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
note: Injunction may be granted to prevent threatened or apprehended waste or trespass.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting of injunction is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(3) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers

27 Practice and procedure
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23
note: Governs practice and procedure of Supreme Court by High Court or Supreme Court of New South Wales
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-27-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Practice and procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: =

28 Rules of Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) Rules of Court
has part: 28(2) Rules of Court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28(1) Rules of Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23
note: Rules of Court may be made by Judges or two of them.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Rules of Court

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Judges can make Rules of Court.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(1) Rules of Court

28(2) Rules of Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23
note: Rules of Court may provide for places of sitting.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Rules of Court

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(2) Rules of Court

29 Regulations relating to fees
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.24
note: Governor-General may make regulations regarding fees and payments.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29
schema version: 2

29 Sept
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-2
schema version: 2

29 Sept 1958 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-3
schema version: 2

29 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Schedule 1 commencement date
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-4
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to regulate fees.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Regulations relating to fees

3 Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.7
note: Commences on January 1, 1934.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 May 1966
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 June 1988
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
note: Statutory Instruments (Tabling and Disallowance) Legislation Amendment Act 1988
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-3
schema version: 2

30 The Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
note: There shall be a Master of the Court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-2
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 The Master

31 Powers and duties of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Powers and duties of Master
has part: 31(2) Powers and duties of Master
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

31 May 1966
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Statute Law Revision (Decimal Currency) Act
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-2
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This law establishes a legal framework for currency revision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a legal framework for currency revision
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: A legal framework must be established for currency revision

31(1) Powers and duties of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
note: Duties of Master
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Powers and duties of Master

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power to administer oaths and exercise other powers
modality: Deontic
operator: has power to

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Performance of duties
modality: Deontic
operator: shall perform duties

31(2) Powers and duties of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
note: Duty of Master to perform power or duty when no Master present
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Powers and duties of Master

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The power or duty overlaps with the Registrar's ability to act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Power or duty may be exercised by Registrar when no Master present
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Master's obligation implies the duty to perform the power or duty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Master's obligation implies duty to perform power or duty
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognizes the Master's obligation in the absence of the Master
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Master's obligation recognized by system when no Master present
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Master must perform the power or duty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Master has obligation to perform power or duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Master's obligation diffuses to the Registrar in the absence of the Master
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Master's obligation diffuses to Registrar when no Master present
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...

32 Appointment of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) Appointment of Master
has part: 32(2) Appointment of Master
has part: 32(3) Appointment of Master
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32
schema version: 2

32(1) Appointment of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
note: The Master shall be appointed by the Governor-General.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Appointment of Master

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Master must be appointed by the Governor-General.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appointment is mandatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) The Master shall be appointed by the Governor-General.

32(2) Appointment of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
note: No one can be appointed as Master unless they have been a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Appointment of Master

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The appointment period overlaps with the required experience period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The appointment requires a specific set of qualifications.
modality: CogAI
operator: Requires
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No one can be appointed as Master unless they have been a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The appointment is diffused to all relevant authorities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The appointment is recurrently tied to the required experience period.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(2) Appointment of Master

32(3) Appointment of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
note: No one over 65 can be appointed as Master.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Appointment of Master

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits appointment of person over 65 as Master.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (3) A person who has attained 65 years of age shall not be appointed as the Master.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(3) Appointment of Master

33 Term of office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
note: Term of office specification
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33
schema version: 2

33A Oath or affirmation of office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.26
note: Take an oath or affirmation before proceeding to discharge duties.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33a
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Oath or affirmation is a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33A Oath or affirmation of office

33B Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.26
note: Master shall be paid remuneration and allowances determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33b
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Master has an obligation to be paid remuneration and allowances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33B Remuneration and allowances

33C Resignation
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.26
note: The Master may resign by writing signed and delivered to the Governor-General.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33c
schema version: 2

33D Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33D(1) Removal from office
has part: 33D(2) Removal from office
has part: 33D(3) Removal from office
has part: 33D(4) Removal from office
has part: 33D(5) Removal from office
has part: 33D(6) Removal from office
has part: 33D(7) Removal from office
has part: 33D(8) Removal from office
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d
schema version: 2

33D(1) Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: The Governor-General may remove the Master from office on an address praying for his or her removal.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

33D(2) Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: The Governor-General may suspend the Master from office on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

33D(3) Removal from office
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: Statement of grounds for suspension must be laid before Parliament within 7 sitting days.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister MUST cause a statement of the grounds of the suspension to be laid before each House of Parliament.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

33D(4) Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: Suspension terminates if statement is not laid before House or address under subsection (1) is not presented to Governor-General.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspension terminates if statement is not laid before House.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Statement must be laid before House.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33D(4) Removal from office

33D(5) Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: Entitlement to remuneration and allowances is unaffected by suspension from office.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Master has an obligation to be paid remuneration and allowances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

33D(6) Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: Removal from office upon bankruptcy
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The knowledge representation of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Governor-General shall remove the Master from office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of removal if Master compounds with creditors
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring pattern of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The schema validation of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Schema validation of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33D(6) Removal from office

33D(7) Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: The Governor-General may retire the Master from office on the ground of incapacity.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33D(7) Removal from office

33D(8) Removal from office
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
note: The Master may be removed, suspended or retired from office only under this section.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-8-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33d-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 33D Removal from office

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Master can be removed, suspended or retired from office.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

33E Terms and conditions of appointment not provided for by Act
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: Governor-General determines terms and conditions of appointment not provided by Act.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33e-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33e
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Terms and conditions are specified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies deontic type
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text specifies terms and conditions.

33F Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33F(1) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(2) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(3) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(4) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(5) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(6) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(7) Acting appointments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f
schema version: 2

33F(1) Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: The Governor-General may appoint a person to act as Master.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33F Acting appointments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Governor-General
modality: Deontic
operator: may

33F(2) Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: Limitation on acting appointments
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33F Acting appointments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The appointment term is a temporal interval of 12 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval definition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The limitation is justified by the need for fresh appointments
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationale for limitation
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system can enforce the appointment term using AI
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person cannot act beyond the specified term
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding appointment term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The appointment term is defined and communicated to all parties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of appointment term definition
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33F(2) Acting appointments

33F(3) Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: Person may continue acting until vacancy is filled.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 33F Acting appointments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (Vacancy is filled) and (Person acting under paragraph (1)(b))

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies AI reasoning
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (Vacancy is filled) and (Person acting under paragraph (1)(b))

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (Paragraph (1)(b)) and (Master office becomes vacant)

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combines two obligations
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
premise text: (Paragraph (1)(b)) and (Master office becomes vacant)

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33F(3) Acting appointments

33F(4) Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: Applying laws to a person acting as Master
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 33F Acting appointments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying laws to the person
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33F(4) Acting appointments

33F(5) Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: Minister may determine terms and conditions of appointment
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 33F Acting appointments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to act as Master
modality: Deontic
operator: may

33F(6) Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: A person acting as Master may be removed or suspended from office only under section 33D.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 33F Acting appointments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to remove
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Removal of Master
modality: Deontic
operator: removal
premise text: Section 33D

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33F(6) Acting appointments

33F(7) Acting appointments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
note: Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act as Master is not invalid.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33f-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 33F Acting appointments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action is valid
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to act as Master
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Appointment had not arisen

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action is invalid
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to act as Master
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Appointment ceased to have effect

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33F(7) Acting appointments

34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
has part: 34(2) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
has part: 34(3) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
has part: 34(4) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

34(1) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
note: Establishment of Supreme Court officers
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Creates obligations for the State
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(1) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers

34(2) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
note: Appointment of officers by Attorney-General
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has obligation to appoint officers
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(2) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers

34(3) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
note: Deputy Registrar has powers and functions of the Registrar under this Act.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant of power
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

34(4) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
note: Appointment of Deputy Registrar does not affect the exercise or performance of power or function by Registrar.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Appointment does not affect exercise or performance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appointment affects exercise or performance
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Registrar's power or function is unaffected

35 Powers and duties of Registrar
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Powers and duties of Registrar
has part: 35(2) Powers and duties of Registrar
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Powers and duties of Registrar
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
note: The Registrar has power and duty to administer oaths and perform assigned duties.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Powers and duties of Registrar

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Registrar has the power to administer oaths.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Registrar has a duty to perform assigned duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDuty

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(1) Powers and duties of Registrar

35(2) Powers and duties of Registrar
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
note: Duty transfer from Prothonotary to Registrar
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Powers and duties of Registrar

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Registrar's duty performed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty transfer
modality: Deontic
operator: Transfer
premise text: Prothonotary's power exercisable by Registrar

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(2) Powers and duties of Registrar

35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35A(1) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
has part: 35A(2) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
has part: 35A(3) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a
schema version: 2

35A(1) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
note: Directs proceedings for winding-up to be had before the Master or Registrar.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Directs proceedings during the winding-up.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Requires argumentation about proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up.
modality: Argumentation
operator: requires
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up.
modality: CogAI
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires proceedings to be held before the Master or Registrar.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up.
modality: Diffusion
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35A(1) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of

35A(2) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
note: Master or Registrar has powers of the Court in relation to winding-up.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Master or Registrar has power of the Court.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35A(2) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of

35A(3) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
note: Excludes Deputy Registrar from definition of Registrar
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines scope of term
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35A(3) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of

36 Sheriff
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
note: The Sheriff shall be charged with serving and executing court orders.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Sheriff

37 Powers of officers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
note: Powers of officers
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37
schema version: 2

37 All’ powers’ and ‘functions ‘exercisable’ by,’ and all ‘
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
note: Obligation to exercise powers and functions in the Territory
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-2
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in the Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: exercisable
premise text: The Sheriff of New South Wales has the power to exercise...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37 Powers of officers

37A Deputy Sheriffs
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37A(1) Deputy Sheriffs
has part: 37A(2) Deputy Sheriffs
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37a
schema version: 2

37A(1) Deputy Sheriffs
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.32
note: Deputy Sheriffs have the same powers and functions as Sheriffs.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37A Deputy Sheriffs

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equivalent obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: has the same

37A(2) Deputy Sheriffs
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.32
note: Exercise of power or function by the Sheriff is unaffected by appointment of Deputy Sheriff.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37A Deputy Sheriffs

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exercise of power or function unaffected
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise of power or function unaffected by appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Appointment of Deputy Sheriff

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exercise of power or function unaffected
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Appointment of Deputy Sheriff and exercise of power or function are independent events
modality: LinearLogic
operator: And
premise text: Appointment of Deputy Sheriff

38 Manner of giving evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
note: Oral evidence is required in open court, unless parties agree otherwise.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires oral evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Manner of giving evidence

39 Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 39(1) Evidence by affidavit
has part: 39(2) Evidence by affidavit
has part: 39(3) Evidence by affidavit
has part: 39(4) Evidence by affidavit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39
schema version: 2

39(1) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
note: Evidence may be given by affidavit in certain proceedings.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide evidence (again)
modality: Deontic
operator: of the service of any document incidental to the proceedings in the matter or of the signature of a party to the matter,

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for eligible evidence
modality: LTL
operator: of the service of any document incidental to the proceedings in the matter or of the signature of a party to the matter,

39(2) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
note: Order for affidavit evidence
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide evidence by affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: May

39(3) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
note: Conditions may be imposed on an order under subsection (2)
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit

39(4) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
note: Condition for serving affidavit evidence on parties
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit copies must be served on parties
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(4) Evidence by affidavit

4 Dec 1965
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Appearance by barrister or solicitor
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
note: A party may appear before the Supreme Court by a barrister or solicitor.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May appear
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Appearance by barrister or solicitor

41 Orders and commissions for examination of witnesses
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
note: May order examination of witnesses at any stage of proceedings
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-41-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

42 Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
has part: 42(2) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34
note: Court may proceed with case despite unrepresented defendant
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Non-appearance or absence of some defendants

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court may nevertheless entertain the cause
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to proceed
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (1) When there are several defendants...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(1) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants

42(2) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34
note: Court may proceed with jurisdiction despite defendant's non-appearance.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Non-appearance or absence of some defendants

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(2) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants

43 Amendment of defect in proceedings
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34
note: Supreme Court or Judge may amend defects in proceedings.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to amend
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Amendment of defect in proceedings

44 Formal defects to be amended
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(1) Formal defects to be amended
has part: 44(2) Formal defects to be amended
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

44(1) Formal defects to be amended
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
note: Court may not invalidate proceedings due to formal defects unless substantial injustice is caused.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Formal defects to be amended

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider formal defects in proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(1) Formal defects to be amended

44(2) Formal defects to be amended
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
note: Court or Judge may declare proceeding valid despite defects.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Formal defects to be amended

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to declare validity
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(2) Formal defects to be amended

44A Reserved judgments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44A(1) Reserved judgments
has part: 44A(2) Reserved judgments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a
schema version: 2

44A(1) Reserved judgments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
note: Judges' opinions can be made public without all being present.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Reserved judgments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public during this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval where judges' opinions can be made public.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public through inference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt describes a situation where judges' opinions can be inferred by other judges.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Judges' opinions can be made public.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public through diffusion.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt describes a situation where judges' opinions are diffused to other judges.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public until this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval where judges' opinions can be made public.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.

44A(2) Reserved judgments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
note: Judgment of the Court has the same force and effect as if the Judge had been present in court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Reserved judgments

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The temporal intervals meet at the point where the Judge's opinion is made public.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Meets
premise text: (2) In any such case...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The presence of the Judge implies the validity of the judgment.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) In any such case...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) In any such case...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The obligation is propagated to all relevant parties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (2) In any such case...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A(2) Reserved judgments

45 Matter heard at one place may be further dealt with at another
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
note: Court may pronounce judgment or give further hearing at another place
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-45-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a power to act
modality: Deontic
operator: May

46 Change of venue
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
note: The court may direct that the trial be held at a particular place.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-46-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court may direct that the trial be held at a particular place.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

47 Seal
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
note: The Supreme Court must keep a Seal in custody as directed by the Chief Justice.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-47-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Supreme Court must keep a Seal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

48 Use of Seals
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
note: All writs, commissions and process issued from the Supreme Court must be in the name of the King and signed by the Registrar.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to use seals
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Use of Seals

49 Date of process
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
note: All writs and process issued from the Supreme Court must be dated as of the day they are issued.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to date writs and process
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49 Date of process

5 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.7
note: Definitions for terms used in the Act.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

5 July 1957
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Supreme Court Act 1958
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5 Apr 1971
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-3
schema version: 2

5 Apr 1971 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
note: Legislation history for Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act (No. 2) 1971
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-4
schema version: 2

5 June 1985
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
note: Commencement of Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-5
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive definition
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Interpretation

50 Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50(1) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 50(2) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 50(3) Oaths and affirmations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50
schema version: 2

50(1) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
note: Use of oath in Supreme Court proceedings must conform to New South Wales' rules.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Oaths and affirmations

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Same as New South Wales' rules
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to use oath
modality: Deontic
operator: use
premise text: Ordinance or Rules of Court

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(1) Oaths and affirmations

50(2) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
note: A person may make an affirmation instead of taking an oath in a cause or matter in the Supreme Court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Oaths and affirmations

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make an affirmation instead of taking an oath.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(2) Oaths and affirmations

50(3) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
note: The form of affirmation shall be in accordance with the law of that State.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Oaths and affirmations

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(3) Oaths and affirmations

53 Indictable offences
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53(1) Indictable offences
has part: 53(2) Indictable offences
has part: 53(3) Indictable offences
has part: 53(3A) Indictable offences
has part: 53(4) Indictable offences
has part: 53(5) Indictable offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53
schema version: 2

53(1) Indictable offences
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
note: Appointment of prosecutor for indictable offences
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Indictable offences

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appointment of a person to prosecute an indictable offence
modality: Deontic
operator: appointment

53(2) Indictable offences
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
note: The Attorney-General may file an information without examination or commitment for trial of the accused person.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Indictable offences

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General may file an information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(2) Indictable offences

53(3) Indictable offences
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
note: Summon or arrest accused person upon information being filed
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Indictable offences

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Summon or arrest accused person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide summons or arrest
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Information filed without examination or commitment for trial

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(3) Indictable offences

53(3A) Indictable offences
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
note: Preserves prosecution powers of Director and Special Prosecutor
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Indictable offences

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to prosecute by information in his official name
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Preserves prosecution powers
modality: Deontic
operator: preserve
premise text: (3A) preserves the power of...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(3A) Indictable offences

53(4) Indictable offences
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
note: Information against a person charged with an indictable offence may include additional counts based on committal proceedings.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Indictable offences

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Information includes additional counts
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(4) Indictable offences

53(5) Indictable offences
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
note: Permits joining multiple counts in one information
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Indictable offences

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: More than one count
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies the condition under which multiple counts can be joined
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
premise text: The last preceding subsection

53A Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53A(1) Interest up to judgment
has part: 53A(2) Interest up to judgment
has part: 53A(3) Interest up to judgment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a
schema version: 2

53A(1) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
description: Interest calculation or lump sum
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38
note: Court must order interest on judgment
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53A Interest up to judgment

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must order interest
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53A(1) Interest up to judgment

53A(2) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38
note: Prohibits certain actions related to interest and debt recovery
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53A Interest up to judgment

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Does not apply to conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: not
premise text: Subsection (1) does not:

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negates the authorization of certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the giving of interest upon interest or a sum in lieu thereof
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (a) authorize the giving of interest upon interest or of a sum in lieu of such interest;

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits affecting damages recoverable for the dishonour of a bill of exchange
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (c) affect the damages recoverable for the dishonour of a bill of exchange.

53A(3) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38
note: Interest not given for certain amounts or damages
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 53A Interest up to judgment

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval includes certain dates or periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes certain patterns or relationships in data
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interest, or a sum in lieu of interest, shall not be given...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies relevant sums into categories
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads information about certain conditions or events
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval occurs before certain dates or periods
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...

54 Interest on judgments
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.39
note: Interest on judgments is payable at a rate fixed by the Rules of Court from the date of judgment entry.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to pay interest.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Interest on judgments

55 Security of the peace and for good behaviour
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.39
note: Authority to hold security of the peace and for good behaviour
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-55-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has authority to hold security of the peace and for good behaviour
modality: Deontic
operator: has

56 Powers of Judge
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.39
note: Vesting of power or function in Supreme Court or Judge
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power or function vested in Supreme Court or Judge
modality: Deontic
operator: vests

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56 Powers of Judge

57 Duty of receiver and manager
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.40
note: Receiver or manager must manage and deal with property according to state laws.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-57-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

58 Liability and protection of receivers and managers
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.40
note: Receiver or manager can be sued without previous leave of Court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possibility of being sued
modality: Deontic
operator: can

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58 Liability and protection of receivers and managers

59 Action by or against Sheriff etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.40
note: Direct writs and commands to Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff to a disinterested person appointed by the Court or Judge.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Writs and commands shall be directed to the appointed person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff to execute and return writs and commands.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Court or Judge appoints a disinterested person.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Action by or against Sheriff etc.

6 Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Establishment of Supreme Court
has part: 6(2) Establishment of Supreme Court
has part: 6(3) Establishment of Supreme Court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Dec 1988
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
note: Amendment history and provision affected information
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6(1) Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
note: Establishment of Supreme Court is obligatory.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Establishment of Supreme Court

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(1) Establishment of Supreme Court

6(2) Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
note: The Court shall be a superior court of record.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Establishment of Supreme Court

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the existence of the Court IS-BETWEEN 9 (page number).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for the existence of the Court.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The establishment of the Supreme Court IMPLIES that it is a superior court of record.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishment of Supreme Court implies its role as a superior court of record.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court MUST be a superior court of record.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be a superior court of record.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to be a superior court of record SPREADS to all instances of the Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation to be a superior court of record spreads to all instances of the Court.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The establishment of the Supreme Court ⇒ The Court IS-A a superior court of record.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Establishment of Supreme Court implies the existence of a superior court of record.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Establishment of Supreme Court

6(3) Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
note: Establishment of Supreme Court
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Establishment of Supreme Court

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in subsection (2)

7 Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Appointment and tenure of Judges
has part: 7(1A) Appointment and tenure of Judges
has part: 7(1B) Appointment and tenure of Judges
has part: 7(2) Appointment and tenure of Judges
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

7 June 1957
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-2
schema version: 2

7 May 1982
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Companies (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1981
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-3
schema version: 2

7 May 1982
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Legislation history for Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-4
schema version: 2

7(1) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
note: Governor-General may appoint Chief Justice and other Judges.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for appointment process.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Governor-General's authority.
modality: Argumentation
operator: None
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted to Governor-General.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Appointment process dissemination.
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Sequential appointment process.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: None
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1) Appointment and tenure of Judges

7(1A) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
note: No person shall be appointed under subsection (1) if he has attained the age of 70 years.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1A) Appointment and tenure of Judges

7(1B) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
note: Judges have seniority based on commission dates.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The seniority of judges overlaps with their commission dates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Seniority overlaps with commission dates.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Respecting the order of appointment is implied by the seniority of judges.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Seniority implies a duty to respect the order of appointment.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI system recognizes the seniority of judges based on their commission dates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the seniority of judges.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges with earlier commission dates are more senior.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Judges have a seniority obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSeniority
premise text: (Commission dates determine seniority).

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The seniority of one judge diffuses to other judges with earlier commission dates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Seniority diffuses to other judges.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1B) Appointment and tenure of Judges

7(2) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
note: The Governor-General may appoint a Judge of another court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appointment obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(2) Appointment and tenure of Judges

7A Acting Chief Justice
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
note: Duties of Acting Chief Justice
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7a
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7A Acting Chief Justice

7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7AA(1) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
has part: 7AA(2) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
has part: 7AA(3) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7aa
schema version: 2

7AA(1) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
note: Appointment made under section 7 after July 1990, subject to certain conditions.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for appointments made under section 7 after July 1990.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (1) This section applies to an appointment...

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7AA(1) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992

7AA(2) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
note: Consultation with Australian Capital Territory Executive required before appointment.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Invalid appointment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Appointment made without consultation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7AA(2) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992

7AA(3) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
note: Ceases effect on July 1, 1992
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section ceases effect on July 1, 1992

7B Arrangement of business of Court
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
note: Responsible for ensuring orderly and expeditious discharge of Court business
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7b-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7b
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may make arrangements as...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief Justice has obligation to ensure orderly discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: Chief Justice is responsible for...

8 Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Exercise of jurisdiction
has part: 8(2) Exercise of jurisdiction
has part: 8(3) Exercise of jurisdiction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8(1) Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
note: Supreme Court jurisdiction exercisable by one Judge or in Chambers Exercise of jurisdiction subject to this section
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Exercise of jurisdiction

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supreme Court has jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(1) Exercise of jurisdiction

8(2) Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
note: Permits jurisdiction to be exercised by Master and Registrar under specified conditions. Right to appeal a judgment of the Master made in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Rules of Court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Exercise of jurisdiction

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows jurisdiction to be exercised
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: Rules of Court

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: May appeal as prescribed by the Rules of Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the right to appeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: The person is dissatisfied with a judgment of the Master.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(2) Exercise of jurisdiction

8(3) Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
note: Exclusion of Deputy Registrar from definition of Registrar
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Exercise of jurisdiction

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3) Exercise of jurisdiction

8A Holding of other judicial offices
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
note: A person may hold multiple judicial offices.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8a
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Multiple offices allowed
modality: Deontic
operator: mayBe

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A Holding of other judicial offices

8AA Exercise of jurisdiction in relation to legal practitioners
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
note: Supreme Court jurisdiction over legal practitioners' admission and practising certificates.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8aa
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8AA Exercise of jurisdiction in relation to legal practitioners

8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8AB(1) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
has part: 8AB(2) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
has part: 8AB(3) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
has part: 8AB(4) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ab
schema version: 2

8AB(1) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
note: Jurisdiction of the Court is exercisable by one Judge.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to exercise jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: exercisable

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8AB(1) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be

8AB(2) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
note: A Judge may order that jurisdiction in a matter be exercised by not less than three Judges.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates a temporal relationship.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

8AB(3) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
note: The Judge may order that jurisdiction be exercised by not less than three Judges.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Judge may order...
modality: Deontic
operator: May

8AB(4) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
note: Jurisdiction of Court in a matter shall be exercised by not less than three Judges sitting together in Court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies duty
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

8AC Manner in which question to be decided where jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14
note: Judges' decision on a question is determined by the majority opinion, with certain exceptions.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ac
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Judges are obligated to follow the majority opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8AC Manner in which question to be decided where jurisdiction

8AD Exercise by Court of powers of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8AD(1) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
has part: 8AD(2) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ad
schema version: 2

8AD(1) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14
note: The Master may refer proceedings to a single Judge.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8AD Exercise by Court of powers of Master

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Master.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

8AD(2) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14
note: Court may give directions on procedure and use of evidence in proceedings.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8AD Exercise by Court of powers of Master

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may give directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

8B Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8B(1) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(2) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(3) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(4) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(5) Salary and allowances of Judges
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8b
schema version: 2

8B(1) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
note: Judges must receive salary and allowances.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between salary payment and allowance allocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Salary payment implies allowance allocation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Automated inference of allowance allocation based on salary payment
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judges must receive salary and allowances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Allowance allocation differs from salary payment in terms of temporal relationship
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffersFrom
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8B(1) Salary and allowances of Judges

8B(2) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
note: Monthly salary and allowance for Judges
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the State to pay monthly salary and allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8B(2) Salary and allowances of Judges

8B(3) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
note: A Judge must be remunerated with the salary and annual allowance of another court.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remuneration of a Judge with the salary and annual allowance of another court occurs during their term in office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Remuneration occurs during the Judge's term
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration during their term in office.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Providing remuneration implies a duty for the court to pay the salary and annual allowance of another court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Remuneration implies a duty to provide
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Providing remuneration in one court implies that the salary and annual allowance of another court should be provided as well, requiring AI processing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Remuneration requires AI processing
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration from their own court.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A Judge must be remunerated with the salary and annual allowance of another court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The law requires a Judge to be remunerated.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Providing remuneration in one court implies that the salary and annual allowance of another court should be provided as well.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Remuneration diffuses to other courts
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration from their own court.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8B(3) Salary and allowances of Judges

8B(4) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
note: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated for payment of salaries and allowances.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8B(4) Salary and allowances of Judges

8B(5) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
note: No salary or allowance for judges with dual appointments.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits receiving salary or allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

9 Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Principal seat of court and sittings
has part: 9(2) Principal seat of court and sittings
has part: 9(3) Principal seat of court and sittings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

9 Dec 1933
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-2
schema version: 2

9 Dec 1948
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Salaries (Statutory Offices) Adjustment Act
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-3
schema version: 2

9 June 1955
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
note: Commencement of Act 1955
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-4
schema version: 2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: January 1955
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 36, 1955

9 Dec 1976
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-5
schema version: 2

9(1) Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
note: Specify places for Supreme Court sittings
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Principal seat of court and sittings

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) Principal seat of court and sittings

9(2) Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
note: Specify times of Supreme Court sittings
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Principal seat of court and sittings

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify times
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(2) Principal seat of court and sittings

9(3) Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
note: The offices of the Supreme Court shall be at Canberra.
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Principal seat of court and sittings

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offices of the Supreme Court MUST be at Canberra.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide offices location
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The offices of the Supreme Court shall be at Canberra.

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(3) Principal seat of court and sittings

Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933
type: Document
date: 24 November 2009
identifier: No. 34 of 1933
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU