Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 34 of 1933
date: 24 November 2009
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

24 November 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Compilation and amendment information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-logic-descriptionlogic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933
premise text: The text is a compilation of the law.
conclusion text: It shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 24 November 2009.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short Title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Cites this Act as the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.7
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-norm

3 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Commences on January 1, 1934.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.7
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-3-norm

5 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Definitions for terms used in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.7
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-deontic-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
has part: 6(1) Establishment of Supreme Court
has part: 6(2) Establishment of Supreme Court
has part: 6(3) Establishment of Supreme Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9

6(1) Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Establishment of Supreme Court
note: Establishment of Supreme Court is obligatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Establishment of Supreme Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Establishment of Supreme Court
note: The Court shall be a superior court of record.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Establishment of Supreme Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to be a superior court of record.
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.
conclusion text: The Court MUST be a superior court of record.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Establishment of Supreme Court implies the existence of a superior court of record.
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.
conclusion text: The establishment of the Supreme Court ⇒ The Court IS-A a superior court of record.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for the existence of the Court.
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the existence of the Court IS-BETWEEN 9 (page number).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Establishment of Supreme Court implies its role as a superior court of record.
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.
conclusion text: The establishment of the Supreme Court IMPLIES that it is a superior court of record.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Obligation to be a superior court of record spreads to all instances of the Court.
premise text: (2) The Court shall be a superior court of record.
conclusion text: The obligation to be a superior court of record SPREADS to all instances of the Court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Establishment of Supreme Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-3
part of: 6 Establishment of Supreme Court
note: Establishment of Supreme Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in subsection (2)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
has part: 7(1) Appointment and tenure of Judges
has part: 7(1A) Appointment and tenure of Judges
has part: 7(1B) Appointment and tenure of Judges
has part: 7(2) Appointment and tenure of Judges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9

7(1) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges
note: Governor-General may appoint Chief Justice and other Judges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Appointment and tenure of Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted to Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: None
logic summary: Sequential appointment process.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
logic summary: Temporal interval for appointment process.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: None
logic summary: Governor-General's authority.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
logic summary: Appointment process dissemination.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 6, the Governor-General may appoint under this subsection...
conclusion text: ...a Chief Justice of the Court and other Judges of the Court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(1A) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-1a
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges
note: No person shall be appointed under subsection (1) if he has attained the age of 70 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1a-norm

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1A) Appointment and tenure of Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7(1B) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-1b
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges
note: Judges have seniority based on commission dates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1B) Appointment and tenure of Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSeniority
logic summary: Judges have a seniority obligation.
premise text: (Commission dates determine seniority).
conclusion text: Judges with earlier commission dates are more senior.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Seniority overlaps with commission dates.
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).
conclusion text: The seniority of judges overlaps with their commission dates.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Seniority implies a duty to respect the order of appointment.
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).
conclusion text: Respecting the order of appointment is implied by the seniority of judges.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Seniority diffuses to other judges.
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).
conclusion text: The seniority of one judge diffuses to other judges with earlier commission dates.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the seniority of judges.
premise text: (Judges have seniority based on commission dates).
conclusion text: The CogAI system recognizes the seniority of judges based on their commission dates.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Appointment and tenure of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Appointment and tenure of Judges
note: The Governor-General may appoint a Judge of another court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.9
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Appointment and tenure of Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Appointment obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7aa
has part: 7AA(1) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
has part: 7AA(2) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
has part: 7AA(3) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10

7AA(1) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7aa-ss-1
part of: 7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
note: Appointment made under section 7 after July 1990, subject to certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7AA(1) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for appointments made under section 7 after July 1990.
premise text: (1) This section applies to an appointment...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7AA(2) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7aa-ss-2
part of: 7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
note: Consultation with Australian Capital Territory Executive required before appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7AA(2) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: Appointment made without consultation
conclusion text: Invalid appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7AA(3) Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7aa-ss-3
part of: 7AA Appointments between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1992
note: Ceases effect on July 1, 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between sections
premise text: Section ceases effect on July 1, 1992
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7A Acting Chief Justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7a
note: Duties of Acting Chief Justice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.10
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7A Acting Chief Justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7B Arrangement of business of Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7b
note: Responsible for ensuring orderly and expeditious discharge of Court business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7b-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Chief Justice has obligation to ensure orderly discharge
premise text: Chief Justice is responsible for...
conclusion text: ...may make arrangements as...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) Exercise of jurisdiction
has part: 8(2) Exercise of jurisdiction
has part: 8(3) Exercise of jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11

8(1) Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Exercise of jurisdiction
note: Supreme Court jurisdiction exercisable by one Judge or in Chambers Exercise of jurisdiction subject to this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Exercise of jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Supreme Court has jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Exercise of jurisdiction
note: Permits jurisdiction to be exercised by Master and Registrar under specified conditions. Right to appeal a judgment of the Master made in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Rules of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(2) Exercise of jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows jurisdiction to be exercised
premise text: Rules of Court
conclusion text: Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has the right to appeal.
premise text: The person is dissatisfied with a judgment of the Master.
conclusion text: May appeal as prescribed by the Rules of Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3) Exercise of jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Exercise of jurisdiction
note: Exclusion of Deputy Registrar from definition of Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.11
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-3-norm

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3) Exercise of jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

8AA Exercise of jurisdiction in relation to legal practitioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8aa
note: Supreme Court jurisdiction over legal practitioners' admission and practising certificates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8AA Exercise of jurisdiction in relation to legal practitioners
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ab
has part: 8AB(1) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
has part: 8AB(2) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
has part: 8AB(3) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
has part: 8AB(4) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13

8AB(1) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-1
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
note: Jurisdiction of the Court is exercisable by one Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8AB(1) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exercisable
logic summary: Obligation to exercise jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8AB(2) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-2
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
note: A Judge may order that jurisdiction in a matter be exercised by not less than three Judges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Indicates a temporal relationship.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8AB(3) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-3
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
note: The Judge may order that jurisdiction be exercised by not less than three Judges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Judge may order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8AB(4) Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ab-ss-4
part of: 8AB Power of Judge to order that jurisdiction in a matter be
note: Jurisdiction of Court in a matter shall be exercised by not less than three Judges sitting together in Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8AC Manner in which question to be decided where jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ac
note: Judges' decision on a question is determined by the majority opinion, with certain exceptions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8AC Manner in which question to be decided where jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Judges are obligated to follow the majority opinion.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8AD Exercise by Court of powers of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ad
has part: 8AD(1) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
has part: 8AD(2) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14

8AD(1) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ad-ss-1
part of: 8AD Exercise by Court of powers of Master
note: The Master may refer proceedings to a single Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Master.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8AD(2) Exercise by Court of powers of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8ad-ss-2
part of: 8AD Exercise by Court of powers of Master
note: Court may give directions on procedure and use of evidence in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.14
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may give directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A Holding of other judicial offices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8a
note: A person may hold multiple judicial offices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A Holding of other judicial offices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayBe
logic summary: Multiple offices allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

8B Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8b
has part: 8B(1) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(2) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(3) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(4) Salary and allowances of Judges
has part: 8B(5) Salary and allowances of Judges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15

8B(1) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8b-ss-1
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges
note: Judges must receive salary and allowances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8B(1) Salary and allowances of Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty
conclusion text: Judges must receive salary and allowances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between salary payment and allowance allocation
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Salary payment implies allowance allocation
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffersFrom
logic summary: Allowance allocation differs from salary payment in terms of temporal relationship
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Automated inference of allowance allocation based on salary payment
premise text: (1) The Chief Justice and the other Judges appointed under subsection (1) of section 7 shall receive salary, annual allowances and travelling allowances at such respective rates as are fixed from time to time by the Parliament.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

8B(2) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8b-ss-2
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges
note: Monthly salary and allowance for Judges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8B(2) Salary and allowances of Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on the State to pay monthly salary and allowance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8B(3) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8b-ss-3
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges
note: A Judge must be remunerated with the salary and annual allowance of another court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8B(3) Salary and allowances of Judges
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: The law requires a Judge to be remunerated.
conclusion text: A Judge must be remunerated with the salary and annual allowance of another court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Remuneration occurs during the Judge's term
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration during their term in office.
conclusion text: Remuneration of a Judge with the salary and annual allowance of another court occurs during their term in office.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Remuneration implies a duty to provide
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration.
conclusion text: Providing remuneration implies a duty for the court to pay the salary and annual allowance of another court.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Remuneration diffuses to other courts
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration from their own court.
conclusion text: Providing remuneration in one court implies that the salary and annual allowance of another court should be provided as well.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Remuneration requires AI processing
premise text: The law requires a Judge to receive remuneration from their own court.
conclusion text: Providing remuneration in one court implies that the salary and annual allowance of another court should be provided as well, requiring AI processing.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8B(4) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8b-ss-4
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges
note: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated for payment of salaries and allowances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8B(4) Salary and allowances of Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8B(5) Salary and allowances of Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8b-ss-5
part of: 8B Salary and allowances of Judges
note: No salary or allowance for judges with dual appointments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-8b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits receiving salary or allowance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
has part: 9(1) Principal seat of court and sittings
has part: 9(2) Principal seat of court and sittings
has part: 9(3) Principal seat of court and sittings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16

9(1) Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Principal seat of court and sittings
note: Specify places for Supreme Court sittings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-1-norm

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Principal seat of court and sittings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Principal seat of court and sittings
note: Specify times of Supreme Court sittings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2) Principal seat of court and sittings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify times
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(3) Principal seat of court and sittings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 Principal seat of court and sittings
note: The offices of the Supreme Court shall be at Canberra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(3) Principal seat of court and sittings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide offices location
premise text: (3) The offices of the Supreme Court shall be at Canberra.
conclusion text: The offices of the Supreme Court MUST be at Canberra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Oath of allegiance and office by Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Take oath of allegiance and office before proceeding to discharge duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.16
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Take oath of allegiance and office before proceeding to discharge duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Jurisdiction in Chambers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Jurisdiction of Supreme Court exercisable by one Judge may be exercised by the Judge sitting in Chambers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.17
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Jurisdiction in Chambers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exercisable
logic summary: Obligation to exercise jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Trial without jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
has part: 14(1) Trial without jury
has part: 14(2) Trial without jury
has part: 14(3) Trial without jury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18

14(1) Trial without jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Trial without jury
note: Trial without jury in Supreme Court suits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Trial without jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide trial without jury
premise text: (1) In every suit in the Supreme Court...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Trial without jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Trial without jury
note: The Supreme Court or Judge may order a trial with a jury if it appears just.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2) Trial without jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May order a trial with a jury.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(3) Trial without jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Trial without jury
note: Supreme Court has jurisdiction to set aside a verdict or finding of a jury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(3) Trial without jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
has part: 15(1) Costs
has part: 15(2) Costs
has part: 15(3) Costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18

15(1) Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 Costs
note: Supreme Court has jurisdiction to award costs in all matters brought before the Court, including matters dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1) Costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Supreme Court has jurisdiction to award costs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 Costs
note: Court discretion to determine costs in Supreme Court proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2) Costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine
logic summary: Court has power to decide on costs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(3) Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-3
part of: 15 Costs
note: Nothing in this section alters the practice followed in criminal causes or matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.18
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(3) Costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Practice is not altered
premise text: Nothing in this section alters the practice
conclusion text: The practice would otherwise be followed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Service of writs out of the jurisdiction of the Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Service of writs out of jurisdiction allowed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Service of writs out of the jurisdiction of the Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Permits service of writs out of jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Law and equity to be concurrently administered
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
note: Law and equity shall be administered concurrently in Supreme Court cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Law and equity to be concurrently administered
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Equities of plaintiff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
note: The Supreme Court shall give the same relief as the English Court of Chancery in a suit or proceeding for the like purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Equities of plaintiff
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Supreme Court has an obligation to provide the same relief as the English Court of Chancery.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Equities of defendant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
note: The Supreme Court or Judge must give effect to equitable estates, rights, and grounds of relief claimed by the defendant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.19
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Equities of defendant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide effect to equitable estates, rights, and grounds of relief.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Counter claims and third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
has part: 20(1) Counter claims and third parties
has part: 20(2) Counter claims and third parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20

20(1) Counter claims and third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Counter claims and third parties
note: Granting of relief to defendants in equity and law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Counter claims and third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Defendant has power to claim relief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Counter claims and third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Counter claims and third parties
note: Every person served with notice is deemed a party to the cause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Counter claims and third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to be a party
premise text: Served with notice
conclusion text: Deemed a party
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Equities appearing incidentally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
note: Notice of equitable estates and rights appearing incidentally in court proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.20
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Equities appearing incidentally
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notice of equitable estates and rights.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Defence or stay instead of injunction or prohibition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: No cause or proceeding can be restrained by prohibition or injunction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.21
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Defence or stay instead of injunction or prohibition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No cause or proceeding can be restrained by prohibition or injunction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Common law and statutory rights and duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Supreme Court or Judge must give effect to all legal claims and demands, estates, titles, rights, duties, obligations, and liabilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.21
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 Common law and statutory rights and duties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give effect to all legal claims and demands.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Determination of matter completely and finally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-2
note: The Supreme Court must grant remedies in every cause or matter pending before the Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Determination of matter completely and finally
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Supreme Court must grant remedies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Rules of equity to prevail
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Rules of equity prevail in conflicts with common law rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Rules of equity to prevail
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Obligation to follow equity rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
has part: 26(1) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
has part: 26(2) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
has part: 26(3) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22

26(1) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
note: Supreme Court may grant mandamus, injunctions or appoint receiver in certain cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(1) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Granting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
note: Court may make order on terms and conditions it thinks just.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Court can make order on terms and conditions it thinks just.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

26(3) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-3
part of: 26 Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
note: Injunction may be granted to prevent threatened or apprehended waste or trespass.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.22
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(3) Mandamus, injunctions and receivers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting of injunction is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Practice and procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Governs practice and procedure of Supreme Court by High Court or Supreme Court of New South Wales
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-27-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Practice and procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Rules of Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
has part: 28(1) Rules of Court
has part: 28(2) Rules of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23

28(1) Rules of Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 Rules of Court
note: Rules of Court may be made by Judges or two of them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(1) Rules of Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Judges can make Rules of Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Rules of Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
part of: 28 Rules of Court
note: Rules of Court may provide for places of sitting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.23
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-2-norm

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-28-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(2) Rules of Court
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

29 Regulations relating to fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
note: Governor-General may make regulations regarding fees and payments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Regulations relating to fees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to regulate fees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30 The Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: There shall be a Master of the Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 The Master
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Powers and duties of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
has part: 31(1) Powers and duties of Master
has part: 31(2) Powers and duties of Master
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25

31(1) Powers and duties of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Powers and duties of Master
note: Duties of Master
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has power to
logic summary: Power to administer oaths and exercise other powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall perform duties
logic summary: Performance of duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2) Powers and duties of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 Powers and duties of Master
note: Duty of Master to perform power or duty when no Master present
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Master has obligation to perform power or duty
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...
conclusion text: The Master must perform the power or duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Power or duty may be exercised by Registrar when no Master present
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...
conclusion text: The power or duty overlaps with the Registrar's ability to act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Master's obligation implies duty to perform power or duty
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...
conclusion text: The Master's obligation implies the duty to perform the power or duty
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Master's obligation diffuses to Registrar when no Master present
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...
conclusion text: The Master's obligation diffuses to the Registrar in the absence of the Master
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Master's obligation recognized by system when no Master present
premise text: (2) Where, under a law of New South Wales...
conclusion text: The system recognizes the Master's obligation in the absence of the Master
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Appointment of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
has part: 32(1) Appointment of Master
has part: 32(2) Appointment of Master
has part: 32(3) Appointment of Master
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25

32(1) Appointment of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Appointment of Master
note: The Master shall be appointed by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Appointment is mandatory.
premise text: (1) The Master shall be appointed by the Governor-General.
conclusion text: The Master must be appointed by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Appointment of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Appointment of Master
note: No one can be appointed as Master unless they have been a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Appointment of Master
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No one can be appointed as Master unless they have been a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The appointment period overlaps with the required experience period.
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: The appointment is recurrently tied to the required experience period.
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The appointment is diffused to all relevant authorities.
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Requires
logic summary: The appointment requires a specific set of qualifications.
premise text: (2) A person shall not be appointed as the Master unless...
conclusion text: ...the person has been enrolled as a legal practitioner of the High Court or of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for not less than 5 years.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Appointment of Master
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 Appointment of Master
note: No one over 65 can be appointed as Master.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(3) Appointment of Master
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits appointment of person over 65 as Master.
premise text: (3) A person who has attained 65 years of age shall not be appointed as the Master.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Term of office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
note: Term of office specification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.25
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33-norm

33A Oath or affirmation of office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33a
note: Take an oath or affirmation before proceeding to discharge duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33A Oath or affirmation of office
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Oath or affirmation is a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33B Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33b
note: Master shall be paid remuneration and allowances determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33B Remuneration and allowances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Master has an obligation to be paid remuneration and allowances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33C Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33c
note: The Master may resign by writing signed and delivered to the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.26
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33c-norm

33D Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d
has part: 33D(1) Removal from office
has part: 33D(2) Removal from office
has part: 33D(3) Removal from office
has part: 33D(4) Removal from office
has part: 33D(5) Removal from office
has part: 33D(6) Removal from office
has part: 33D(7) Removal from office
has part: 33D(8) Removal from office
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27

33D(1) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-1
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: The Governor-General may remove the Master from office on an address praying for his or her removal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33D(2) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-2
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: The Governor-General may suspend the Master from office on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33D(3) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-3
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: Statement of grounds for suspension must be laid before Parliament within 7 sitting days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide statement
conclusion text: The Minister MUST cause a statement of the grounds of the suspension to be laid before each House of Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33D(4) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-4
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: Suspension terminates if statement is not laid before House or address under subsection (1) is not presented to Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33D(4) Removal from office
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
premise text: Statement must be laid before House.
conclusion text: Suspension terminates if statement is not laid before House.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33D(5) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-5
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: Entitlement to remuneration and allowances is unaffected by suspension from office.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Master has an obligation to be paid remuneration and allowances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33D(6) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-6
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: Removal from office upon bankruptcy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-shacl-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 33D(6) Removal from office
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of removal if Master compounds with creditors
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...
conclusion text: The Governor-General shall remove the Master from office.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...
conclusion text: The period of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...
conclusion text: The recurring pattern of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...
conclusion text: The knowledge representation of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-6-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Schema validation of bankruptcy as a condition for removal
premise text: (6) If the Master becomes bankrupt...
conclusion text: The schema validation of bankruptcy is a condition for removal from office.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33D(7) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-7
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: The Governor-General may retire the Master from office on the ground of incapacity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33D(7) Removal from office
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33D(8) Removal from office
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33d-ss-8
part of: 33D Removal from office
note: The Master may be removed, suspended or retired from office only under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-8-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: The Master can be removed, suspended or retired from office.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33E Terms and conditions of appointment not provided for by Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33e
note: Governor-General determines terms and conditions of appointment not provided by Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33e-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33e-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies deontic type
premise text: The text specifies terms and conditions.
conclusion text: Terms and conditions are specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33F Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f
has part: 33F(1) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(2) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(3) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(4) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(5) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(6) Acting appointments
has part: 33F(7) Acting appointments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28

33F(1) Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f-ss-1
part of: 33F Acting appointments
note: The Governor-General may appoint a person to act as Master.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Governor-General
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33F(2) Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f-ss-2
part of: 33F Acting appointments
note: Limitation on acting appointments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33F(2) Acting appointments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding appointment term
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.
conclusion text: The person cannot act beyond the specified term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval definition
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.
conclusion text: The appointment term is a temporal interval of 12 months
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
logic summary: Rationale for limitation
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.
conclusion text: The limitation is justified by the need for fresh appointments
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Spread of appointment term definition
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.
conclusion text: The appointment term is defined and communicated to all parties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (2) A person appointed to act as Master shall not continue to act for more than 12 months.
conclusion text: The system can enforce the appointment term using AI
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33F(3) Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f-ss-3
part of: 33F Acting appointments
note: Person may continue acting until vacancy is filled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33F(3) Acting appointments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
logic summary: Combines two obligations
premise text: (Paragraph (1)(b)) and (Master office becomes vacant)
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap
premise text: (Vacancy is filled) and (Person acting under paragraph (1)(b))
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spreads obligation
premise text: (Paragraph (1)(b)) and (Master office becomes vacant)
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Applies AI reasoning
premise text: (Vacancy is filled) and (Person acting under paragraph (1)(b))
conclusion text: Person acting under paragraph (1)(b) may continue to act until vacancy is filled
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33F(4) Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f-ss-4
part of: 33F Acting appointments
note: Applying laws to a person acting as Master
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33F(4) Acting appointments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applying laws to the person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33F(5) Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f-ss-5
part of: 33F Acting appointments
note: Minister may determine terms and conditions of appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to act as Master
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33F(6) Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f-ss-6
part of: 33F Acting appointments
note: A person acting as Master may be removed or suspended from office only under section 33D.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33F(6) Acting appointments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: removal
logic summary: Removal of Master
premise text: Section 33D
conclusion text: Obligation to remove
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33F(7) Acting appointments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33f-ss-7
part of: 33F Acting appointments
note: Anything done by or in relation to a person purporting to act as Master is not invalid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33F(7) Acting appointments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to act as Master
premise text: Appointment had not arisen
conclusion text: Action is valid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-33f-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to act as Master
premise text: Appointment ceased to have effect
conclusion text: Action is invalid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
has part: 34(1) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
has part: 34(2) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
has part: 34(3) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
has part: 34(4) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30

34(1) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
note: Establishment of Supreme Court officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Creates obligations for the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
note: Appointment of officers by Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(2) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Attorney-General has obligation to appoint officers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
note: Deputy Registrar has powers and functions of the Registrar under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Grant of power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(4) Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-4
part of: 34 Registrar, Sheriff and other officers
note: Appointment of Deputy Registrar does not affect the exercise or performance of power or function by Registrar.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Appointment affects exercise or performance
premise text: Registrar's power or function is unaffected
conclusion text: Appointment does not affect exercise or performance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Powers and duties of Registrar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) Powers and duties of Registrar
has part: 35(2) Powers and duties of Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30

35(1) Powers and duties of Registrar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Powers and duties of Registrar
note: The Registrar has power and duty to administer oaths and perform assigned duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Powers and duties of Registrar
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: The Registrar has the power to administer oaths.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDuty
logic summary: The Registrar has a duty to perform assigned duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Powers and duties of Registrar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Powers and duties of Registrar
note: Duty transfer from Prothonotary to Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Powers and duties of Registrar
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Transfer
logic summary: Duty transfer
premise text: Prothonotary's power exercisable by Registrar
conclusion text: Registrar's duty performed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a
has part: 35A(1) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
has part: 35A(2) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
has part: 35A(3) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31

35A(1) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-1
part of: 35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
note: Directs proceedings for winding-up to be had before the Master or Registrar.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(1) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires proceedings to be held before the Master or Registrar.
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Directs proceedings during the winding-up.
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires argumentation about proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up.
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up.
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up.
premise text: (1) The Supreme Court, in making an order for the winding-up of a company...
conclusion text: Proceedings for and in relation to the winding-up shall be had and taken before the Master or Registrar.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(2) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-2
part of: 35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
note: Master or Registrar has powers of the Court in relation to winding-up.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(2) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Master or Registrar has power of the Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(3) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-3
part of: 35A Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
note: Excludes Deputy Registrar from definition of Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(3) Proceedings before Registrar in relation to winding-up of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Defines scope of term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Sheriff
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
note: The Sheriff shall be charged with serving and executing court orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Sheriff
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Powers of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
note: Powers of officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-norm

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Powers of officers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

37 All’ powers’ and ‘functions ‘exercisable’ by,’ and all ‘
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-2
note: Obligation to exercise powers and functions in the Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.31
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exercisable
logic summary: Exercise obligation
premise text: The Sheriff of New South Wales has the power to exercise...
conclusion text: ...in the Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37A Deputy Sheriffs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37a
has part: 37A(1) Deputy Sheriffs
has part: 37A(2) Deputy Sheriffs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.32

37A(1) Deputy Sheriffs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37a-ss-1
part of: 37A Deputy Sheriffs
note: Deputy Sheriffs have the same powers and functions as Sheriffs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.32
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has the same
logic summary: Equivalent obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37A(2) Deputy Sheriffs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37a-ss-2
part of: 37A Deputy Sheriffs
note: Exercise of power or function by the Sheriff is unaffected by appointment of Deputy Sheriff.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.32
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Exercise of power or function unaffected by appointment
premise text: Appointment of Deputy Sheriff
conclusion text: Exercise of power or function unaffected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-37a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: And
logic summary: Appointment of Deputy Sheriff and exercise of power or function are independent events
premise text: Appointment of Deputy Sheriff
conclusion text: Exercise of power or function unaffected
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Manner of giving evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
note: Oral evidence is required in open court, unless parties agree otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Manner of giving evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires oral evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
has part: 39(1) Evidence by affidavit
has part: 39(2) Evidence by affidavit
has part: 39(3) Evidence by affidavit
has part: 39(4) Evidence by affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33

39(1) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit
note: Evidence may be given by affidavit in certain proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: of the service of any document incidental to the proceedings in the matter or of the signature of a party to the matter,
logic summary: Temporal interval for eligible evidence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: of the service of any document incidental to the proceedings in the matter or of the signature of a party to the matter,
logic summary: Permission to provide evidence (again)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit
note: Order for affidavit evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to provide evidence by affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(3) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-3
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit
note: Conditions may be imposed on an order under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-3-norm

39(4) Evidence by affidavit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-4
part of: 39 Evidence by affidavit
note: Condition for serving affidavit evidence on parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(4) Evidence by affidavit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit copies must be served on parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Appearance by barrister or solicitor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
note: A party may appear before the Supreme Court by a barrister or solicitor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Appearance by barrister or solicitor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May appear
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Orders and commissions for examination of witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
note: May order examination of witnesses at any stage of proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-41-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
has part: 42(1) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
has part: 42(2) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34

42(1) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
note: Court may proceed with case despite unrepresented defendant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(1) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court obligation to proceed
premise text: (1) When there are several defendants...
conclusion text: The Court may nevertheless entertain the cause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
note: Court may proceed with jurisdiction despite defendant's non-appearance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Non-appearance or absence of some defendants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Amendment of defect in proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Supreme Court or Judge may amend defects in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.34
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Amendment of defect in proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to amend
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Formal defects to be amended
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
has part: 44(1) Formal defects to be amended
has part: 44(2) Formal defects to be amended
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35

44(1) Formal defects to be amended
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
part of: 44 Formal defects to be amended
note: Court may not invalidate proceedings due to formal defects unless substantial injustice is caused.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(1) Formal defects to be amended
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider formal defects in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(2) Formal defects to be amended
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
part of: 44 Formal defects to be amended
note: Court or Judge may declare proceeding valid despite defects.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Formal defects to be amended
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to declare validity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A Reserved judgments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a
has part: 44A(1) Reserved judgments
has part: 44A(2) Reserved judgments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35

44A(1) Reserved judgments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-1
part of: 44A Reserved judgments
note: Judges' opinions can be made public without all being present.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Judges' opinions can be made public.
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval where judges' opinions can be made public.
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public during this time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval where judges' opinions can be made public.
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public until this time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Excerpt describes a situation where judges' opinions are diffused to other judges.
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public through diffusion.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Excerpt describes a situation where judges' opinions can be inferred by other judges.
premise text: Court orders judgment to stand for judgment.
conclusion text: Judges' opinions can be reduced to writing and made public through inference.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A(2) Reserved judgments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-2
part of: 44A Reserved judgments
note: Judgment of the Court has the same force and effect as if the Judge had been present in court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A(2) Reserved judgments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
premise text: (2) In any such case...
conclusion text: the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Meets
logic summary: The temporal intervals meet at the point where the Judge's opinion is made public.
premise text: (2) In any such case...
conclusion text: ...the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The presence of the Judge implies the validity of the judgment.
premise text: (2) In any such case...
conclusion text: ...the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: The obligation is propagated to all relevant parties.
premise text: (2) In any such case...
conclusion text: ...the judgment of the Court has the same force and effect...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Matter heard at one place may be further dealt with at another
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
note: Court may pronounce judgment or give further hearing at another place
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-45-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a power to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

46 Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: The court may direct that the trial be held at a particular place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-46-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The court may direct that the trial be held at a particular place.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47 Seal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
note: The Supreme Court must keep a Seal in custody as directed by the Chief Justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-47-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The Supreme Court must keep a Seal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Use of Seals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
note: All writs, commissions and process issued from the Supreme Court must be in the name of the King and signed by the Registrar.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Use of Seals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to use seals
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Date of process
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
note: All writs and process issued from the Supreme Court must be dated as of the day they are issued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Date of process
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to date writs and process
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
has part: 50(1) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 50(2) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 50(3) Oaths and affirmations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36

50(1) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Oaths and affirmations
note: Use of oath in Supreme Court proceedings must conform to New South Wales' rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Oaths and affirmations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: use
logic summary: Obligation to use oath
premise text: Ordinance or Rules of Court
conclusion text: Same as New South Wales' rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
part of: 50 Oaths and affirmations
note: A person may make an affirmation instead of taking an oath in a cause or matter in the Supreme Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(2) Oaths and affirmations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make an affirmation instead of taking an oath.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(3) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-3
part of: 50 Oaths and affirmations
note: The form of affirmation shall be in accordance with the law of that State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(3) Oaths and affirmations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Indictable offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
has part: 53(1) Indictable offences
has part: 53(2) Indictable offences
has part: 53(3) Indictable offences
has part: 53(3A) Indictable offences
has part: 53(4) Indictable offences
has part: 53(5) Indictable offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37

53(1) Indictable offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
part of: 53 Indictable offences
note: Appointment of prosecutor for indictable offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appointment
logic summary: Appointment of a person to prosecute an indictable offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) Indictable offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
part of: 53 Indictable offences
note: The Attorney-General may file an information without examination or commitment for trial of the accused person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(2) Indictable offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Attorney-General may file an information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(3) Indictable offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
part of: 53 Indictable offences
note: Summon or arrest accused person upon information being filed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(3) Indictable offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide summons or arrest
premise text: Information filed without examination or commitment for trial
conclusion text: Summon or arrest accused person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(3A) Indictable offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-3a
part of: 53 Indictable offences
note: Preserves prosecution powers of Director and Special Prosecutor
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(3A) Indictable offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: preserve
logic summary: Preserves prosecution powers
premise text: (3A) preserves the power of...
conclusion text: ...to prosecute by information in his official name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(4) Indictable offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
part of: 53 Indictable offences
note: Information against a person charged with an indictable offence may include additional counts based on committal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(4) Indictable offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Information includes additional counts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(5) Indictable offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-5
part of: 53 Indictable offences
note: Permits joining multiple counts in one information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.37
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Specifies the condition under which multiple counts can be joined
premise text: The last preceding subsection
conclusion text: More than one count
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53A Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a
has part: 53A(1) Interest up to judgment
has part: 53A(2) Interest up to judgment
has part: 53A(3) Interest up to judgment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38

53A(1) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a-ss-1
part of: 53A Interest up to judgment
note: Court must order interest on judgment
description: Interest calculation or lump sum
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53A(1) Interest up to judgment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must order interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53A(2) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a-ss-2
part of: 53A Interest up to judgment
note: Prohibits certain actions related to interest and debt recovery
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negates the authorization of certain actions
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: does not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibits the giving of interest upon interest or a sum in lieu thereof
premise text: (a) authorize the giving of interest upon interest or of a sum in lieu of such interest;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibits affecting damages recoverable for the dishonour of a bill of exchange
premise text: (c) affect the damages recoverable for the dishonour of a bill of exchange.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: not
logic summary: Does not apply to conditional commencement
premise text: Subsection (1) does not:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53A(3) Interest up to judgment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a-ss-3
part of: 53A Interest up to judgment
note: Interest not given for certain amounts or damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...
conclusion text: Interest, or a sum in lieu of interest, shall not be given...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies relevant sums into categories
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval includes certain dates or periods
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Temporal interval occurs before certain dates or periods
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spreads information about certain conditions or events
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-53a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes certain patterns or relationships in data
premise text: (3) Where the sum for which judgment is given...
conclusion text: ...any amount for: compensation in respect of liabilities incurred...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Interest on judgments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
note: Interest on judgments is payable at a rate fixed by the Rules of Court from the date of judgment entry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Interest on judgments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to pay interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Security of the peace and for good behaviour
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
note: Authority to hold security of the peace and for good behaviour
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-55-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Has authority to hold security of the peace and for good behaviour
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Powers of Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
note: Vesting of power or function in Supreme Court or Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Powers of Judge
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: vests
logic summary: Power or function vested in Supreme Court or Judge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Duty of receiver and manager
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57
note: Receiver or manager must manage and deal with property according to state laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-57-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Expresses a duty obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Liability and protection of receivers and managers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
note: Receiver or manager can be sued without previous leave of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58 Liability and protection of receivers and managers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Possibility of being sued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Action by or against Sheriff etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
note: Direct writs and commands to Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff to a disinterested person appointed by the Court or Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.40
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Action by or against Sheriff etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Directs Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff to execute and return writs and commands.
premise text: Court or Judge appoints a disinterested person.
conclusion text: Writs and commands shall be directed to the appointed person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Dec 1933
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-2-norm

1 Jan 1934 (s 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Seat of Government
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-2-norm

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-13-norm

13 Apr 1935
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-2
note: Supreme Court Act 1945, Section 57
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-13-2-norm

19 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-2-norm

19 Oct 1945 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-3
note: Salaries (Statutory Offices) Adjustment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-3-norm

1 Nov 1947
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-3-norm

1 Nov 1947 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
note: Conditional commencement of Judges' Pensions Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-4-norm

9 Dec 1948
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-3
note: Salaries (Statutory Offices) Adjustment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-3-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1950
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-2
note: Judges' Remuneration Act 1955
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to pay judges' remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 June 1955
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-4
note: Commencement of Act 1955
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-4-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: 36, 1955
conclusion text: January 1955
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-3-norm

14 July 1955
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-3
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-3-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-30-2-norm

14 Aug 1956 (s 2 and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-4
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-4-norm

7 June 1957
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-2-norm

5 July 1957
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2
note: Supreme Court Act 1958
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-2-norm

29 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-2-norm

29 Sept 1958 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-3
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-3-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-2-norm

22 May 1959 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-3
note: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 has obligation on the State
premise text: State is obligated to pay judges' remuneration
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 obliges the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 overlaps with other legislation
premise text: Legislation often overlaps with other laws
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 intersects with other legislation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 implies the payment of judges' remuneration
premise text: Payment of judges' remuneration is implied by the legislation
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 requires the payment of judges' remuneration
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 diffuses obligations to pay judges' remuneration
premise text: Obligations are diffused through legislation
conclusion text: Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 spreads the obligation to pay judges' remuneration
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes Judges' Remuneration Act 1960 as a valid legislation
premise text: Artificial intelligence recognizes valid laws
conclusion text: CogAI acknowledges the validity of Judges' Remuneration Act 1960
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-4
note: Commencement of Sch 1 and 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-16-4-norm

20 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-2
note: Amendment by Statute Law Revision Act 1973
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-2-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-4
note: Sch 1: 31 Dec 1973 (s 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-4-norm

4 Dec 1965
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-4-norm

3 May 1966
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-3-2-norm

31 May 1966
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-2
note: Statute Law Revision (Decimal Currency) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Establishes a legal framework for currency revision
premise text: A legal framework must be established for currency revision
conclusion text: This law establishes a legal framework for currency revision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-4
note: Schedule 1 commencement date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-29-4-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-2-norm

10 Dec 1968 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-3
note: Judges' remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-3-norm

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-10-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Dec 1968 (s 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-5-norm

14 June 1969 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-6
note: Supreme Court Act 1971
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-6-norm

5 Apr 1971
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-3-norm

5 Apr 1971 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-4
note: Legislation history for Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act (No. 2) 1971
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-4-norm

17 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-2-norm

17 Nov 1971 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-3
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1973, sections 6(2), (3) and 11(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-17-3-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-5
note: Amendment of Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Amendment Act 1976
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-19-5-norm

9 Dec 1976
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-5
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-9-5-norm

20 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-20-3-norm

1 Apr 1980 (s 2 and gaz
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-1-5-norm

21 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-2
note: Amendment of section 115 by Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 1) 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-2-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-2-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-21-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval for amendment
premise text: Amendment occurred on June 21, 1981
conclusion text: Temporal interval is defined
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 May 1982
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-3
note: Companies (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1981
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-3-norm

18 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-2
note: Conditional commencement of s 15 and 16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-2-norm

2 Dec 1981
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-2-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-4
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-4-norm
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-4-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 May 1982
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-4
note: Legislation history for Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.43
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-7-4-norm

22 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-5
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1983
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-22-5-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-7
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-14-7-norm

5 June 1985
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-5
note: Commencement of Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-5-5-norm

18 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-3
note: Schedule 1 of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-18-3-norm

3 June 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-3
note: Statutory Instruments (Tabling and Disallowance) Legislation Amendment Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-3-3-norm

2 Dec 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-2-2-norm

6 Dec 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
note: Amendment history and provision affected information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-capital-territory-supreme-court-act-1933-sec-6-2-norm