1 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.8
note: Definition of law enforcement officer includes specific roles and agencies.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of law enforcement officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: =

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the

1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1(2A) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
has part: 1(2B) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
has part: 1(2C) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
has part: 1(2D) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

1(2A) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
note: Definition of emergency service facility
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: emergency service facility has a temporal relation to the declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: emergency service facility is declared by the Minister during a specific time period

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: emergency service facility is a class
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: emergency service facility is a subclass of premises

1(2B) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
note: Declare premises as emergency service facility
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare premises
modality: Deontic
operator: May

1(2C) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
note: Minister's declaration not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2C) A declaration by the Minister under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's declaration is not an obligation to comply with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
modality: Deontic
operator: negative obligation
premise text: (2C) A declaration by the Minister under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Minister's declaration is not an obligation to comply with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
premise text: (2C) A declaration by the Minister under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(2C) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)

1(2D) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
description: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
note: Minister must specify force and geographical region in declaration
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between declaration and specification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's argument for specification
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must specify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation to specify
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between declaration and specification
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(2D) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)

10 After subsection 84(1)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: The Ombudsman must include certain information in each report.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
note: Request for reporting on telecommunications services intercepted under warrants.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (i) how many of those warrants involved the interception of a single telecommunications service;

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (ii) how many of those warrants involved the interception of between 2 and 5 telecommunications services;

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (iii) how many of those warrants involved the interception of between 6 and 10 telecommunications services;

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (iv) how many of those warrants involved the interception of more than 10 telecommunications services;

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (ec) in relation to all named person warrants issued during that year on application made by each agency or authority, the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include certain information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 After subsection 84(1)

11 At the end of paragraphs 100(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraphs 100(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 At the end of paragraphs 100(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)

12 After paragraph 100(1)(e)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: Inserts new provisions about named person warrants into the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

13 At the end of paragraphs 100(2)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraphs 100(2)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to add ‘and’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

14 After paragraph 100(2)(e)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
note: Relevant statistics about named person warrants must be provided.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide statistics
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 After paragraph 100(2)(e)

14A Before paragraph 103(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
note: Amendment of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 Schedule 2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14a
schema version: 2

15 After subsection 5(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.16
note: Reference to an employee of a carrier includes a reference to a person engaged by the carrier or whose services are made available to the carrier.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 After subsection 5(4)

2 After paragraph 103(ac)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
note: Declare emergency service facilities
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declare emergency service facilities
modality: Deontic
operator: declare

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: number and type
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Number and type of facilities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasType
premise text: facilities

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 After paragraph 103(ac)

3 Before subsection 6(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.11
note: Inspection of communications does not constitute an interception.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Before subsection 6(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.11
note: Inspection of communications does not constitute an interception.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 6(2H)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.11
note: Omit reference to Australian Communications Authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the reference
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(2E) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
has part: 6(2F) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
has part: 6(2G) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

6(2E) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
note: Revocation of declaration upon disallowance by Parliament
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation occurs at disallowance time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with disallowance event
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Disallowance by Parliament

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration revoked upon disallowance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2E) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)

6(2F) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
note: No interception for lawfully engaged personnel
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No interception
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts listening or recording from interception
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Lawful engagement

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2F) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)

6(2G) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
note: Signs must be visible at each entrance to an emergency service facility.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2F) does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits listening or recording communications at emergency service facilities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Signs must be visible at each entrance.

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2G) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 5(1) (after paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.12
note: Receiving or assisting a person guilty of an offence to escape punishment or dispose of proceeds.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits receiving or assisting a person guilty of an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

9 Paragraph 6K(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a proceeding by way of an application for a restraining order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraph.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Table of sections and commencement provision
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 March 2005.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 March 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 June 1980.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 June 1980
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Reference to Schedule 2, item 15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

17 December
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Reference to F2005L04095
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17 December
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Reference to F2005L04095
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-2
schema version: 2

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Amendment of Schedule 1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Section 6 does not commence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Does not commence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: not

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-4
schema version: 2

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-5
schema version: 2

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

9 Section 9
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act comes into force on the specified day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on a specific day
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
premise text: The Act receives Royal Assent

Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures) Act 2005
type: Document
description: An Act to extend the circumstances in which communications can be intercepted without warrant, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 95 of 2005
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU