Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures) Act 2005
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 95 of 2005
description: An Act to extend the circumstances in which communications can be intercepted without warrant, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-norm

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-2-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-2-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Table of sections and commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-2-norm

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-2-3-norm

1 March 2005.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-3-norm

1 March 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-4-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 December
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
note: Reference to F2005L04095
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-17-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-2-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-3
note: Section 6 does not commence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of commencement
conclusion text: Does not commence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-7-norm

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-4-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 December
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-2
note: Reference to F2005L04095
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-17-2-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on a specific day
premise text: The Act receives Royal Assent
conclusion text: This Act comes into force on the specified day
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-6-5-norm

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Reference to Schedule 2, item 15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-10-norm

1 June 1980.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-5-norm

1 June 1980
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-1-6-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Amendment of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-3-2-norm

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sec-4-2-norm

1 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Definition of law enforcement officer includes specific roles and agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the scope of law enforcement officers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
has part: 1(2A) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
has part: 1(2B) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
has part: 1(2C) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
has part: 1(2D) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9

1(2A) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
note: Definition of emergency service facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: emergency service facility is a subclass of premises
conclusion text: emergency service facility is a class
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: emergency service facility is declared by the Minister during a specific time period
conclusion text: emergency service facility has a temporal relation to the declaration
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(2B) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
note: Declare premises as emergency service facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to declare premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(2C) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
note: Minister's declaration not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(2C) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2C) A declaration by the Minister under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: negative obligation
logic summary: Minister's declaration is not an obligation to comply with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
premise text: (2C) A declaration by the Minister under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
logic summary: Minister's declaration is not an obligation to comply with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
premise text: (2C) A declaration by the Minister under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(2D) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d
part of: 1 Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
note: Minister must specify force and geographical region in declaration
description: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(2D) Subsections 6(2A) and (2B)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must specify
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation between declaration and specification
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation between declaration and specification
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Minister's obligation to specify
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2d-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Minister's argument for specification
premise text: (2D) If the Minister makes a declaration under subsection (2B)
conclusion text: (a) the name of the force or service operating the premises to which the declaration relates; (b) the geographical region in which those premises are located.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
has part: 6(2E) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
has part: 6(2F) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
has part: 6(2G) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10

6(2E) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
note: Revocation of declaration upon disallowance by Parliament
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2E) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of declaration
premise text: Section 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: Declaration revoked upon disallowance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with disallowance event
premise text: Disallowance by Parliament
conclusion text: Revocation occurs at disallowance time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2F) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
note: No interception for lawfully engaged personnel
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2F) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts listening or recording from interception
premise text: Lawful engagement
conclusion text: No interception
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2G) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
note: Signs must be visible at each entrance to an emergency service facility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2G) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits listening or recording communications at emergency service facilities.
premise text: Signs must be visible at each entrance.
conclusion text: Subsection (2F) does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 After paragraph 103(ac)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Declare emergency service facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 After paragraph 103(ac)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
logic summary: Declare emergency service facilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasType
logic summary: Number and type of facilities
premise text: facilities
conclusion text: number and type
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Before subsection 6(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Inspection of communications does not constitute an interception.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-norm

4 Before subsection 6(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Inspection of communications does not constitute an interception.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 6(2H)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Omit reference to Australian Communications Authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the reference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other Measures)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-norm

8 Subsection 5(1) (after paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2
note: Receiving or assisting a person guilty of an offence to escape punishment or dispose of proceeds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits receiving or assisting a person guilty of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Paragraph 6K(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a proceeding by way of an application for a restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 After subsection 84(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: The Ombudsman must include certain information in each report.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 After subsection 84(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include certain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 At the end of paragraphs 100(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraphs 100(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-11-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 At the end of paragraphs 100(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12 After paragraph 100(1)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Inserts new provisions about named person warrants into the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-12-norm

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2
note: Request for reporting on telecommunications services intercepted under warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
premise text: (i) how many of those warrants involved the interception of a single telecommunications service;
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
premise text: (ii) how many of those warrants involved the interception of between 2 and 5 telecommunications services;
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
premise text: (iii) how many of those warrants involved the interception of between 6 and 10 telecommunications services;
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
premise text: (iv) how many of those warrants involved the interception of more than 10 telecommunications services;
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires reporting on telecommunications services.
premise text: (ec) in relation to all named person warrants issued during that year on application made by each agency or authority, the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
conclusion text: the total number of telecommunication services intercepted under those warrants;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 At the end of paragraphs 100(2)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraphs 100(2)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to add ‘and’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 After paragraph 100(2)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Relevant statistics about named person warrants must be provided.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 After paragraph 100(2)(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide statistics
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14A Before paragraph 103(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14a
note: Amendment of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-14a-norm

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Interception and Other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-12-2-norm

15 After subsection 5(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Reference to an employee of a carrier includes a reference to a person engaged by the carrier or whose services are made available to the carrier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 After subsection 5(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-telecommunications-interception-and-other-measures-act-2005-sch-2-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed