1 Part 2 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
note: Repeal Part.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Part 2 of Schedule 1

2 Transitional—clauses 14 and 15 of Schedule 1 to the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
note: Defines pre-commencement reporting period for transitional provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

1 Section 6 (after table item 9)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: Enforceable undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-1
schema version: 2

2 After Part 31
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: Insert clause after Part 31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-2005-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-2005
schema version: 2

28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-28
schema version: 2

572A Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: A person may give an enforceable undertaking about compliance with the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572A Simplified outline

572B Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572B(1) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(2) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(3) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(4) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(5) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(6) Acceptance of undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b
schema version: 2

572B(1) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: Acceptance of undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Accepts undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts

572B(2) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: Expressing an undertaking under section 572B(2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings

572B(3) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: Consent required for withdrawal or variation of undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: only with the consent of ACMA
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person may withdraw or vary the undertaking

572B(4) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: Cancellation of undertaking by ACMA
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancellation occurs at a specific time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between cancellation and undertaking
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancellation implies termination of undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of cancellation on undertaking
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancellation is inferred from ACMA's action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference of cancellation from ACMA's action
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking is cancelled
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA can cancel the undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Cancel
premise text: ACMA may, by written notice given to the person

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancellation propagates through the system
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of cancellation through the system
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person

572B(5) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: ACMA may publish undertaking on its Internet site.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: on its Internet site
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publishing requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Publish
premise text: ACMA may publish

572B(6) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
note: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the specified act
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as a subclass of this Act
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf

572C Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572C(1) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 572C(2) Enforcement of undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572c
schema version: 2

572C(1) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.31
note: Enforcement of breach of undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572C Enforcement of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply to Federal Court for order
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: ACMA considers breach

572C(2) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.31
note: Court may order person to comply with undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572C Enforcement of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572C(2) Enforcement of undertakings

1 Section 61
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'A carrier licence'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 61

151CP Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151CP(1) Operational separation for Telstra
has part: 151CP(2) Operational separation for Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-151cp
schema version: 2

151CP(1) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Telstra must comply with the final operational separation plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151CP Operational separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151CP(2) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's functions or powers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151CP Operational separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between conduct and consideration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN A TIMEFRAME
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Relevance of conduct to Telstra's functions or powers.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relevance of conduct to Telstra's functions or powers.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider conduct relevant to Telstra's functions or powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of consideration to conduct.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS SPREAD TO
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...

152EQ Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152EQ(1) Operational separation for Telstra
has part: 152EQ(2) Operational separation for Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-152eq
schema version: 2

152EQ(1) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Telstra must comply with a final operational separation plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152EQ Operational separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

152EQ(2) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Must have regard to conduct relevant to the function or power under this Part in relation to Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152EQ Operational separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: regard to the conduct is relevant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Commission must have regard to the conduct.

2 At the end of section 61
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(2) At the end of section 61
has part: 2(3) At the end of section 61
has part: 2(4) At the end of section 61
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2
schema version: 2

2(2) At the end of section 61
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Minister may declare Part 8 of Schedule 1 ceases to have effect on a specified day.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 At the end of section 61

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of cessation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

2(3) At the end of section 61
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 At the end of section 61

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration has effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (3) A declaration under subsection (2)

2(4) At the end of section 61
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: A declaration under subsection (2) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2 At the end of section 61

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration is a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(4) At the end of section 61

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(6) No. 119, 2005
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
note: No limitation on matters to which regard may be had
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-3
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(6) No. 119, 2005
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4
schema version: 2

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: Minister cannot vary determination without Telstra's consent
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: without Telstra's consent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of varying determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Minister must not vary

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: Consultation requirement before making a determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister MUST consult Telstra.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult Telstra
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (5) Before making a determination under subclause (1)

2005(6) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Provide a copy of the preliminary version on the Internet site within 30 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision has a temporal interval of at least 30 days.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (i) and (ii)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the preliminary version on the Internet site.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(6) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(7) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(8) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(10) No. 119, 2005
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6
schema version: 2

2005(10) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: No variation of a final operational separation plan is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits variations of final operational separation plans from being legislative instruments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (10) A variation of a final operational separation plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Minister may have regard to matters not limited by subclause (3)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has an interval of having regard to these matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval between the Minister and matters
modality: AllenInterval
operator: have regard
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has a cognitive relation of having regard to these matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a cognitive relation between the Minister and matters
modality: CogAI
operator: may
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must consider these matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has a diffusion of having regard to these matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a diffusion between the Minister and matters
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has a trace of having regard to these matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a trace between the Minister and matters
modality: LTL
operator: may
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Minister's approval within 90 days is deemed approval.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister approved variation under subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation approval period overlaps with 90-day deadline.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Minister received draft variation before end of 90 days.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister received draft variation before end of 90 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Variation approval implies Minister's obligation to approve within 90 days.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Minister approved variation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister approved variation under subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Variation approval inference from Minister's obligation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Minister received draft variation before end of 90 days.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister approved variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation to approve variation within 90 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Minister received draft variation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister approved variation under subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Variation approval propagates to Minister's subsequent actions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Minister neither approves nor refuses to approve variation.

2005(6) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Notify Telstra of decision to approve variation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

2005(7) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
description: Reasons for refusal
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Minister must notify Telstra of reasons for refusal.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

2005(8) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Conditional variation of a plan upon Minister's approval.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

2005(9) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-7
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(10) No. 119, 2005
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-8
schema version: 2

2005(10) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: A direction under subclause (8) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: occurs during the legislative instruments for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: implies that it is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication on the definition of a legislative instrument
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: can be applied by artificial intelligence as a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: is
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: spreads to other contexts as a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of the definition to other contexts
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(10) No. 119, 2005

2005(9) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-9
schema version: 2

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: No contravention of a direction under subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) Telstra must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (4)

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: No legislative instrument
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (5) A direction under subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005

2005(6) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: Section does not limit section 69.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not limit Section 69
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section implies other section
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Section 69

3 After section 61
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-30
schema version: 2

32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-32
schema version: 2

34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-34
schema version: 2

36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-36
schema version: 2

38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-38
schema version: 2

4 After section 69
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-40
schema version: 2

42 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-42
schema version: 2

44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-44
schema version: 2

46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-46
schema version: 2

48 Aim and objects
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 48(1) Aim and objects
has part: 48(2) Aim and objects
has part: 48(3) Aim and objects
has part: 48(4) Aim and objects
has part: 48(5) Aim and objects
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-48
schema version: 2

48(1) Aim and objects
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
note: Promote transparency and equivalence in wholesale services supply
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Aim and objects

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to promote transparency and equivalence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) The aim of this Part is...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(1) Aim and objects

48(2) Aim and objects
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
note: Promote a principle of equivalence in relation to the supply by Telstra of designated services.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Aim and objects

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Promote a principle of equivalence in relation to the supply by Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

48(3) Aim and objects
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
note: Regard must be had to terms and conditions relating to price or a method of ascertaining price.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Aim and objects

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for regarding terms and conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: regard must be had to:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regard must be had to terms and conditions relating to price or a method of ascertaining price.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In determining the principle of equivalence covered by paragraph (2)(a), regard must be had to:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(3) Aim and objects

48(4) Aim and objects
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
note: Regard may be had to matters not limited by subclause (3)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Aim and objects

48(5) Aim and objects
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
note: Must consider the needs of wholesale customers in relation to eligible services.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Aim and objects

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to consider the needs of wholesale customers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider the needs of wholesale customers.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The needs of wholesale customers must be considered.

49 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Draft operational separation plan, Draft rectification plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
note: Prepare operational separation plans and comply with rectification plans.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-49-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-49
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare plans
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

5 After paragraph 70(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.35
note: Condition for carrier Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 After paragraph 70(5)(b)

50 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
note: Definitions for Telstra business units and services
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50
schema version: 2

50A Designated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50A(1) Designated services
has part: 50A(2) Designated services
has part: 50A(3) Designated services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a
schema version: 2

50A(1) Designated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39
note: Definition of designated service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50A Designated services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Eligible service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Written determination
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
premise text: Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50A(1) Designated services

50A(2) Designated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39
note: Minister cannot make a determination without Telstra's consent
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50A Designated services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra's consent required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making a determination without consent
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Minister's action

50A(3) Designated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39
note: Applicability of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to Minister's power
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 50A Designated services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to a power conferred on the Minister by subclause (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's power is subject to Acts Interpretation Act 1901
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (3) Subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 applies

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50A(3) Designated services

50B Declared network services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50B(1) Declared network services
has part: 50B(2) Declared network services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50b
schema version: 2

50B(1) Declared network services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: Defines declared network service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50B Declared network services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declared network service is a service specified in a written determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of the term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: For the purposes of this Part

50B(2) Declared network services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50B Declared network services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision specifies a temporal interval.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision analyzes language usage.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes language usage
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is classified as an undertaking.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies provision as undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision specifies a relation between instruments.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Identifies relation between instruments
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision validates data format.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates data format
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

50C Notional contracts
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: Treat notional contracts as actual contracts for Telstra's business units.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-50c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra's business units.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
has part: 51(2) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
has part: 51(3) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
has part: 51(4) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
description: Annual reports and independent audit reports
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: Telstra must prepare and report on compliance with the operational separation plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires reporting within a specified period after each financial year
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (i) within a specified period after the end of each financial year, to prepare a report about the extent to which Telstra complied with the plan during that year;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty to give reports to the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (ii) to give the report to the Minister;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty to make reports available on the Internet site
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (iii) to make a copy of the report, or extracts from the report, available on Telstra’s Internet site;

51(2) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: Manner of meeting paragraph (1)(b) or (c) requirement is not limited by subclause.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan

51(3) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: Empowers Minister, ACCC or ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to administrative decisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: empower

51(4) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
note: A determination under paragraph (1)(d) is a legislative instrument
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A legislative instrument
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (4) A determination under paragraph (1)(d) is a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A final operational separation plan
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of final operational separation plan
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: A final operational separation plan is a draft operational separation plan that has been approved by the Minister—see clause 55.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A draft operational separation plan
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of draft operational separation plan
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (4) A determination under paragraph (1)(d) is a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(4) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan

52 Draft operational separation plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.41
note: Must provide draft operational separation plan to Minister within 90 days
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-52-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-52
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

53 Public comment—draft operational separation plan
type: Concept
description: Notice to be published
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.41
note: Publish a notice in a newspaper before submitting an operational separation plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-53
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
premise text: Before submitting an operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Publish a notice in a newspaper before submitting an operational separation plan

54 Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(1) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(2) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(3) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(4) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(5) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(6) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(7) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(8) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(9) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(10) Approval of draft by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54
schema version: 2

54(1) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Telstra must give the Minister a draft operational separation plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54(10) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: A direction under subclause (8) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(10) Approval of draft by Minister

54(2) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Minister must approve or refuse plan approval
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54(3) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Plan is a temporal interval that the Minister considers.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's decision implies consideration of certain matters.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minister's consideration spreads to other matters.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:

54(4) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: The Minister may have regard for matters beyond the scope of subclause (3).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

54(5) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Minister's approval within 90 days is deemed approval.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister approved plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Plan is approved within 90 days of receipt.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: Minister received draft plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister approved plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation to approve plan within 90 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Minister received draft plan.

54(6) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of decision to approve plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54(7) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
description: Reasons for refusal
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the Minister’s reasons for the refusal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54(8) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Direct Telstra to vary the draft plan and provide it within 60 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct Telstra to vary the draft plan.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54(9) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
note: Determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) was made during the legislative process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Determination made during the legislative process.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is an argument for the legislative process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Determination is an argument for the legislative process.
modality: Argumentation
operator: is
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is an artificial intelligence application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Determination is an artificial intelligence application.
modality: CogAI
operator: is
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument that spreads to other parts of the legislation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Determination spreads to other parts of the legislation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(9) Approval of draft by Minister

55 Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Effect of approval
has part: 55(2) Effect of approval
has part: 55(3) Effect of approval
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
note: Plan becomes final upon approval.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Effect of approval

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The final operational separation plan comes into force at the time when Telstra is notified of the approval.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Plan becomes final.
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
premise text: (1) If the Minister approves a draft operational separation plan, the plan becomes a final operational separation plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(1) Effect of approval

55(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
note: Plan is not a legislative instrument for certain purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Effect of approval

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A final operational separation plan is a legislative instrument for certain purposes.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) A final operational separation plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

55(3) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
note: Compliance with a final operational separation plan is not required.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-55-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Effect of approval

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (3) Compliance with a final operational separation plan is not a condition of Telstra’s carrier licence.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(3) Effect of approval

56 Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 56(2) Variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 56(3) Variation of final operational separation plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56
schema version: 2

56(1) Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
note: Variation of final operational separation plan requires Telstra's draft variation to be given to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Variation of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: if
premise text: (a) a final operational separation plan is in force; and (b) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Expresses a requirement for action.
modality: Argumentation
operator: requires

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

56(2) Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
note: Must approve or refuse variation of final operational separation plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Variation of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve or refuse variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56(3) Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a variation of the final operational separation plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Variation of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(3) Variation of final operational separation plan

56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56A(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
has part: 56A(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
has part: 56A(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a
schema version: 2

56A(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation plan if in force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56A(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation

56A(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Minister may direct Telstra to prepare a draft variation of the plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

56A(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56A(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation

57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57(1) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 57(2) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 57(3) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 57(4) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-57
schema version: 2

57(1) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
note: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister after certain conditions are met
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan is a type of draft variation
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide draft variation of final operational separation plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister and previously communicated to Telstra under certain conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister before certain conditions are met
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(1) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan

57(2) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
description: Written comments within 20 days
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
note: Publish notice and make preliminary version available online
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and make preliminary version available online
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57(3) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
description: Comments
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
note: Must provide written comments with draft variation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide comments
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

57(4) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
note: Notice under subparagraph (1)(b)(ii) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan

58 Publication of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(1) Publication of final operational separation plan
has part: 58(2) Publication of final operational separation plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-58
schema version: 2

58(1) Publication of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: Make a copy of the final operational separation plan available on Telstra's Internet site.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-58-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Publication of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a copy of the plan available
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58(2) Publication of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
description: Copy of varied final operational separation plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: Publish varied final operational separation plan on Internet site
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-58-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Publication of final operational separation plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must publish
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

59 Contents of draft or final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59(1) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
has part: 59(2) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-59
schema version: 2

59(1) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
type: Concept
description: (a) the action to be taken by Telstra to ensure that the contravention ceases; (b) the action to be taken by Telstra directed towards ensuring that there is no repetition of the contravention in the future; (c) the action to be taken by Telstra by way of reporting to the Minister on any action taken by it as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: Matters to be set out in a draft or final rectification plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-59-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Contents of draft or final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This action is BETWEEN taking action to cease contravention and ensuring no repetition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting action taken by Telstra
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (c) the action to be taken by Telstra by way of reporting to the Minister on any action taken by it as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra MUST set out this matter in each draft or final rectification plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the action to be taken by Telstra to ensure that the contravention ceases;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra MUST report this action to the Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation for Telstra to report action taken
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) the action to be taken by Telstra by way of reporting to the Minister on any action taken by it as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra MUST take this action to cease contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation for Telstra to take action to cease contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the action to be taken by Telstra to ensure that the contravention ceases;

59(2) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: Empowers Minister, ACCC or ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-59-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Contents of draft or final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: empower

6 At the end of section 70
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.35
note: No limitation on subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 At the end of section 70

60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60(1) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
has part: 60(2) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
has part: 60(3) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
has part: 60(4) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-60
schema version: 2

60(1) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Draft rectification plan timing not specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Draft rectification plan implies Minister involvement
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Draft rectification plan is related to Minister
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a draft rectification plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Draft rectification plan is related to Minister
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.

60(2) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: Minister may give Telstra a written direction requiring a draft rectification plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

60(3) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: Comply with direction within 90 days
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period of 90 days is a temporal interval during which Telstra must comply with the direction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ∈
premise text: (3) Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days after the day on which the direction was given.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days after the day on which the direction was given.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the Minister gives a direction, then Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: ⇒
premise text: (3) The Minister may give directions.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the direction is given, then Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: (3) Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days after the day on which the direction was given.

60(4) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
note: A direction under this clause is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A direction under this clause is a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direction is a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (4) A direction under this clause...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(4) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister

61 Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(2) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(3) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(4) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(5) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(6) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(7) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(8) Approval of draft by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: Telstra must provide a draft rectification plan to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61(2) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: Minister must approve or refuse plan approval
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61(3) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The plan approval involves considering future actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Plan approval involves temporal consideration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: the Minister must have regard to the following matters:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the following matters.

61(4) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: The Minister may have regard for matters beyond the scope of subclause (3).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

61(5) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: Minister's approval within 90 days is deemed approval.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister approved plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation to approve plan within 90 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Minister received draft plan.

61(6) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of decision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between notification and decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the plan,

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61(7) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
description: Reasons for refusal
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the Minister’s reasons for the refusal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61(8) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
description: Variated draft plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
note: Direct Telstra to vary the draft plan and provide it within 60 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must vary the draft plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation to direct Telstra
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61A(1) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(2) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(3) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(4) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(5) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a
schema version: 2

61A(1) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Minister must conduct review of Part 8 operation before July 2009.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A(1) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

61A(2) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Must consider specific matters when reviewing conditions relating to operational separation of Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider specific matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A review under subsection (1) must have regard to the following matters:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A(2) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

61A(3) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Minister must prepare report after review under subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister MUST cause to be prepared a report...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A(3) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

61A(4) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Table report in Parliament within 15 sitting days
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to table report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61A(5) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
note: Defines terms for review of conditions relating to operational activities.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A(5) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational

62 Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(1) Effect of approval
has part: 62(2) Effect of approval
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-62
schema version: 2

62(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Plan becomes final upon approval and takes effect upon notification.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-62-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Effect of approval

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan is final
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Plan becomes final
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
premise text: Approval is given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan takes effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Plan takes effect upon notification
modality: LinearLogic
operator: when
premise text: Notification occurs

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(1) Effect of approval

62(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Plan is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Effect of approval

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The plan must be made during the period in which the Act applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A final rectification plan is an instrument that must be made in accordance with the Act if and only if it meets certain criteria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Equivalence to legislative instrument
modality: CogAI
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A final rectification plan is an instrument that must be made in accordance with the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A final rectification plan is an instrument that must be made in accordance with the Act if and only if it meets certain criteria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Equivalence to legislative instrument
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The plan must be made during the period in which the Act applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation to Act
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

63 Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(2) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(3) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(4) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(5) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(6) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(7) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(8) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(9) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(10) Variation of final rectification plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Variation of final rectification plan obligation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation of the final rectification plan is given during this period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan during specific period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must take action based on this draft variation of the plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan implies specific action by Minister
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AI system recognizes this draft variation of the plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan recognized by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must provide a draft variation of the plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide variation of final rectification plan
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
premise text: (1) This clause applies if: (a) a final rectification plan is in force; and (b) the plan relates to a particular contravention; and (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information about the draft variation of the plan is diffused to the Minister
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan diffuses to Minister
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.

63(10) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A variation of a final rectification plan is an obligation to comply with the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (10) A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is forbidden to classify a variation of a final rectification plan as a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on classification
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (10) A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a variation of a final rectification plan is not classified as a legislative instrument, then it implies an obligation to comply with the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (10) A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

63(2) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Must approve or refuse variation of final rectification plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve or refuse variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

63(3) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a variation of the final rectification plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister must consider matters during the decision-making process.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister must consider the specified matters in making a decision.
modality: Argumentation
operator: consider
premise text: (a) the extent to which the action proposed to be taken by Telstra under the plan as proposed to be varied will be likely to ensure that...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Minister must take into account the specified matters.
modality: CogAI
operator: must consider
premise text: (a) the extent to which the action proposed to be taken by Telstra under the plan as proposed to be varied will be likely to ensure that...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minister must take into account the specified matters.
modality: Diffusion
operator: must consider
premise text: (a) the extent to which the action proposed to be taken by Telstra under the plan as proposed to be varied will be likely to ensure that...

63(4) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: The Minister may have regard to matters beyond the scope of subclause (3).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(4) Variation of final rectification plan

63(5) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Minister must approve variation within 90 days or take action at end of period
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must be approved within 90 days after receipt of draft variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation must be approved within 90 days after receipt of draft variation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The Minister received the draft variation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister's inaction implies failure to approve variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's inaction implies failure to approve variation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Minister neither approves nor refuses to approve variation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Minister received the draft variation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must approve variation within 90 days or take action at end of period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Minister neither approves nor refuses to approve variation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Minister received the draft variation

63(6) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Notify Telstra of decision to approve variation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Decision implies notification
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Decision entails notification
modality: CogAI
operator: ENTAILS
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify Telstra
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Notification affects Telstra
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISTRIBUTIVE
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.

63(7) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
description: Reasons for refusal
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify Telstra
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

63(8) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: Minister must approve variation to the final rectification plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's approval is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(8) Variation of final rectification plan

63(9) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
note: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-cogai-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-shacl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: is
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: RDF classification
modality: N3Logic
operator: is-a
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of the definition
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(9) Variation of final rectification plan

64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
has part: 64(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
has part: 64(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-64
schema version: 2

64(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-64-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan

64(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
note: Minister directs Telstra to prepare a draft variation of the plan within 60 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-64-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to direct Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

64(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-64-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan

65 Compliance with final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
note: Compliance with final rectification plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-65-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-65
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

66 Publication of final rectification plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66(1) Publication of final rectification plan
has part: 66(2) Publication of final rectification plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-66
schema version: 2

66(1) Publication of final rectification plan
type: Concept
description: Copy of the plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Publish final rectification plan on Internet site
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-66-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Publication of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between plan publication and Internet site availability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must publish the plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

66(2) Publication of final rectification plan
type: Concept
description: Copy of varied final rectification plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Publish final rectification plan on Internet site after variation comes into force
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-66-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Publication of final rectification plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69A(1) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
has part: 69A(2) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
has part: 69A(3) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a
schema version: 2

69A(1) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
note: Remedial directions for breach of conditions relating to Telstra's actions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must comply with the conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

69A(2) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
note: Telstra must take specified action to prevent future breach of conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take specified action.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

69A(3) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
note: Examples of direction that may be given to Telstra under subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating

69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69B(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(7) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(8) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b
schema version: 2

69B(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: Right to review ACCC direction
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: May

69B(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: Application for review of a section 69A direction must be made in writing within 7 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for review must be made in writing within 7 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Review application must be made within 7 days after the ACCC gave the direction.
modality: Epistemic
operator: WITHIN

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application for review must be made within a temporal interval of 7 days.
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69B(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

69B(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: Must review direction on application for review
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

69B(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: The Australian Competition Tribunal may make a decision affirming, setting aside, or varying a section 69A direction.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: may

69B(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal is taken to be a decision of the ACCC for certain purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision is taken to be a decision of the ACCC
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (5) A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69B(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

69B(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: ACCC must provide information, reports, and assistance to the Tribunal as specified.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information, reports, and assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

69B(7) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: May consider information given to the ACCC in connection with a section 69A direction
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May consider information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Consider relevant information
modality: Epistemic
operator: regard to

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal consideration of information
modality: LTL
operator: may have regard to

69B(8) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
note: Division 2 of Part IX applies to proceedings before the Australian Competition Tribunal under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division 2 of Part IX applies to proceedings before the Australian Competition Tribunal under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

7 At the end of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.35
note: Operational separation of Telstra at the end of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 At the end of Part XIB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Add at the end of Part XIB
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 After section 152EP
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 After subsection 152CPA(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.51
note: Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness in making interim determination under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-12-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is not required during this temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which procedural fairness is not required
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption from procedural fairness applies if both conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Combination of conditions for exemption from procedural fairness
modality: CogAI
operator: and
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interim determination is a subclass of determinations with consistent price-related terms and conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of determinations with consistent price-related terms and conditions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: Price-related terms and conditions in interim determination are consistent with those in section 152AQA or 152AQB determination.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption from procedural fairness applies if this condition is met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Condition for exemption from procedural fairness
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is not required until this temporal interval ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until which procedural fairness is not required
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 After subsection 152CPA(2)

2 After subsection 152CPA(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.51
note: Commission may extend interim determination period under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-12-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission has the power to extend interim determination period.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 After subsection 152CPA(5)

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.52
note: No procedural fairness requirement for granting extensions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-12-sec-2005
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to grant extensions without procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5B) The Commission is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

3 At the end of section 152CPA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.52
note: The Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness in relation to the variation under subsection (10) of an interim determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-12-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of interim determination
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: the declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 At the end of section 152CPA

48 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-12-sec-48
schema version: 2

1 At the end of section 69
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.53
note: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-13-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: A direction under subsection (2) is a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: It is prohibited that a direction under subsection (2) is a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative right
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: It is not the case that a direction under subsection (2) is a right.

2 At the end of section 102
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.53
note: Legislative instrument exemption
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-13-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exempted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from legislative instruments
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: The direction is not a legislative instrument

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 At the end of section 102

3 At the end of section 121
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.53
note: Legislative instrument exemption
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-13-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts legislative instruments from the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 At the end of section 121

1 After subsection 121(1A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.9
note: Person may be given direction under subsection (1) in respect of replacement code during period when replacement code is registered.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

2 At the end of section 122
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.9
note: May be given a formal warning under subsection (2) in respect of the replacement code during the period when the replacement code is registered under this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the person may be given a formal warning
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: The period when the replacement code is registered under this Part.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to be given a formal warning
modality: Deontic
operator: May

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2005-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2005
schema version: 2

3 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.10
note: Prevents conduct from occurring before commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

6 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

1 Paragraph 460(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a new provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

2 Subparagraphs 460(3)(c)(ii) and (iv)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
note: Omit '90 days', substitute '30 days'.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-2005-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2005
schema version: 2

3 After subsection 460(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
note: Declaration under subparagraph (3)(a)(ii) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: legislative instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration is a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (3)(a)(ii)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 After subsection 460(4)

4 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
note: Exemptions from amendments for certain variations of numbering plans
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

8 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

1 Paragraph 151BX(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
note: Prohibit contraventions of the competition rule exceeding 21 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits contraventions of the competition rule exceeding 21 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

2 Application of amendment
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
note: Amendment applies to contraventions of competition rule after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amendment applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Period began after commencement.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Application of amendment

1 At the end of subsection 152AS(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: Conditional reference to section 152BBAA for judicial enforcement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
schema version: 2

2 At the end of subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
references: section 152BBAA
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: References section for judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2005(1) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005
schema version: 2

2005(1) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
note: Court may make orders to comply with conditions or limitations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has obligation to enforce conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(1) No. 119, 2005

2005(2) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
note: May discharge or vary an order granted under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to discharge or vary an order
modality: Deontic
operator: can

2005(3) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
note: Section does not limit section 152BB.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 152BB is not limited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section implies other sections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section 2005(3)

3 At the end of subsection 152AT(5)
type: Concept
references: section 152BBAA
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: References section for judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 At the end of subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
references: section 152BBAA
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: References section for judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 At the end of section 152BB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: Section 152BBAA is not limited by this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 152BBAA is not limited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section does not limit another section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This section

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 At the end of section 152BB

6 After section 152BB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
note: Insert Schedule 5 Enforcement of conditions and limitations of exemption determinations and orders
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
schema version: 2

1 At the end of section 152AS
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.15
note: Reference to Acts Interpretation Act 1901 for variation and revocation of instruments
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
schema version: 2

12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-12
schema version: 2

2 At the end of section 152ASA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.15
note: Reference to Acts Interpretation Act 1901 for variation and revocation of instruments
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-2005-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2005
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 25(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
note: Omit specified text
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

10 Subsection 152BT(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
note: Procedural Rules
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 After subsection 152BU(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
note: Carrier or provider may modify undertaking under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to modify undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: May

12 After subsection 152BY(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
note: Carrier or provider may modify variation under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to modify variation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

13 Subsection 152BY(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
note: Omit 'of a minor nature' and substitute with a variation of a minor nature under the Procedural Rules.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of 'of a minor nature'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(2A) After subsection 152BZ(2)
has part: 14(2B) After subsection 152BZ(2)
has part: 14(2C) After subsection 152BZ(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

14(2A) After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
description: Information within time limit allowed by Procedural Rules
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
note: Commission may reject variation if carrier/provider fails to provide information within time limit.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 14 After subsection 152BZ(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of failing to provide information within time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(2A) After subsection 152BZ(2)

14(2B) After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
note: Prohibits effect of subsection (2A) despite anything in the Division.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 14 After subsection 152BZ(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between subsections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: despite
premise text: (2B) Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits effect of subsection (2A)
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2B) Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.

14(2C) After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
note: Effect of rejecting variation on subsection 152BY(7)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 14 After subsection 152BZ(2)

15 Subsection 152BZ(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-15
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal interval specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omit 'The Commission'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: If the Procedural Rules do not make provision for or in relation to a time limit...

16 After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(2A) After subsection 152CBB(2)
has part: 16(2B) After subsection 152CBB(2)
has part: 16(2C) After subsection 152CBB(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

16(2A) After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
note: Commission may reject undertaking if information not given within time limit.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 16 After subsection 152CBB(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt specifies time limit within which information must be provided.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission prohibits giving undertaking if information not provided on time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) If the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt specifies time limit within which information must be provided.
modality: LTL
operator: Within
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(2A) After subsection 152CBB(2)

16(2B) After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 16 After subsection 152CBB(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2B)

16(2C) After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
note: Effect of decision to reject undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 16 After subsection 152CBB(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect as if the decision had been made under subsection 152CBC(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conditional effect
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (2C) If the Commission makes a decision under subsection (2A)

17 Subsection 152CBB(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-17-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-17
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

18 After subsection 152CBC(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
note: Modify undertaking before Commission decision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modify undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to modify undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Commission decision

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 After subsection 152CBC(1)

19 After subsection 152CBG(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Allow modification of variation under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: None

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 After subsection 152CBG(2)

2 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
note: Defines modifications as additions, omissions, and substitutions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 152CBG(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Substitute minor nature variation definition
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
note: Substitute provision for time limit in information giving
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-3
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-4
schema version: 2

2005(2) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24
note: No failure to comply affects instrument validity
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan compliance overlaps with instrument validity in some time intervals
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Plan compliance timing overlap with instrument validity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Instrument is inferred to be exempt from plan compliance under subsection 152ELA(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Instrument inference from plan compliance exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Instrument is exempt from plan compliance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Instrument exemption from plan compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption diffuses to related instruments under subsection 152ELA(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exemption diffusion to related instruments
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Instrument validity is traced through the plan compliance time intervals
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Instrument validity tracing through plan compliance
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times

2005(3) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24
note: Plan is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The plan is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

21 After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(2A) After subsection 152CBH(2)
has part: 21(2B) After subsection 152CBH(2)
has part: 21(2C) After subsection 152CBH(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21
schema version: 2

21(2A) After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Commission may reject variation if information not given within time limit.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 21 After subsection 152CBH(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Information must be provided within a specific time interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Variation rejection classified based on AI analysis of information provided within time limit.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission prohibits rejection of variation if information not given within time limit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) If the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Variation rejection diffuses to all parties involved.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Variation rejection is a recurring process based on information provided within time limit.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2A) After subsection 152CBH(2)

21(2B) After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 21 After subsection 152CBH(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2B)

21(2C) After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Effect of decision to reject variation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 21 After subsection 152CBH(2)

22 Subsection 152CBH(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-22
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

23 After section 152CD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) After section 152CD
has part: 23(2) After section 152CD
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-23
schema version: 2

23(1) After section 152CD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Commission may defer consideration of access undertakings or variations thereof.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 After section 152CD

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to defer consideration
modality: Deontic
operator: May

23(2) After section 152CD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
note: Subsection (1) has effect despite anything in this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 After section 152CD

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(2) After section 152CD

24 At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(8) At the end of section 152CLA
has part: 24(9) At the end of section 152CLA
has part: 24(10) At the end of section 152CLA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-24
schema version: 2

24(10) At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
note: Subsection (9) has effect despite anything in this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-24-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 24 At the end of section 152CLA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(10) At the end of section 152CLA

24(8) At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
note: May be displaced or modified by Procedural Rules
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-24-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 24 At the end of section 152CLA

24(9) At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
note: Commission may defer consideration of access dispute
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-24-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 24 At the end of section 152CLA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to defer consideration
modality: Deontic
operator: May

25 At the end of section 152DB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
note: Displacement or modification of certain paragraphs by Procedural Rules.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 At the end of section 152DK
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
note: May be displaced or modified by Procedural Rules
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 At the end of section 152DMA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
note: Permits modification of subsections (1) to (7)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 After Division 10 of Part XIC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
note: Procedural Rules
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-28
schema version: 2

3 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
note: Definition of Procedural Rules
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Procedural Rules are defined
modality: Deontic
operator: defined

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for Procedural Rules
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defined

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Section 152AC

4 Subsection 152AO(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
note: Substitute minor nature variation definition
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 After subsection 152AT(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
note: Applicant may modify application before Commission decision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to modify application
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 After subsection 152AT(2)

6 After subsection 152ATA(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
note: Applicant may modify application within time allowed by Procedural Rules Schedule 7.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to modify application
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 After subsection 152ATA(2)

7 After subsection 152AU(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(2A) After subsection 152AU(2)
has part: 7(2B) After subsection 152AU(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
schema version: 2

7(2A) After subsection 152AU(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
note: Commission may refuse application if information not given within time limit.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 7 After subsection 152AU(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The excerpt specifies a temporal interval (time limit) within which the information must be given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission prohibits applicant from proceeding if information not given within time limit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the applicant does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The excerpt prohibits the applicant from proceeding if information not given within time limit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the applicant does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The excerpt specifies a recurring trace (time limit) within which the information must be given.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(2A) After subsection 152AU(2)

7(2B) After subsection 152AU(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-7-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 7 After subsection 152AU(2)

8 Subsection 152AU(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

9 After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(2A) After subsection 152BT(2)
has part: 9(2B) After subsection 152BT(2)
has part: 9(2C) After subsection 152BT(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
schema version: 2

9(2A) After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
note: Commission may reject undertaking if information not given within time limit.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 9 After subsection 152BT(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission prohibits carrier/provider from failing to provide information within time limit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) If the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier/provider is obligated to provide information within time limit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission prohibits carrier/provider from failing to provide information within time limit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Commission traces carrier/provider's failure to provide information within time limit.
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(2A) After subsection 152BT(2)

9(2B) After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-9-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 9 After subsection 152BT(2)

9(2C) After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
note: Effect of rejection decision on subsection 152BU(5)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 9 After subsection 152BT(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applies temporal overlap between decisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal overlap
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies cognitive processing of decisions
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive processing
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies effect of decision on subsection 152BU(5)
modality: Deontic
operator: effect
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies diffusion of effects between decisions
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies trace between decisions
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking

1 At the end of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
note: Add at the end of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-1
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-2
schema version: 2

2005(2) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
note: Designated interconnection service terms and conditions must be agreed upon or determined by an arbitrator.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation on the carrier and carriage service provider.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005

2005(3) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
note: Regulations may make provision for arbitration conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
description: Nominations in writing by the Chairperson of the ACCC
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
note: ACCC may be constituted by a single member or specified number of members for a particular arbitration.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC may be constituted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
note: No implication that subclause (4) limits subclause (3).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative implication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: (5) Subclause (4) does not, by implication, limit subclause (3).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negative implication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬
premise text: (5) Subclause (4) does not, by implication, limit subclause (3).

22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-22
schema version: 2

24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-24
schema version: 2

44A Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
note: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service from carriage service provider.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-44a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A Simplified outline

45 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
note: Definitions for active declared service, designated interconnection service, and eligible service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
note: Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from carriage service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-46
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to obtain designated interconnection services
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from

47 Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(2) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(3) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(4) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(5) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(6) Designated interconnection services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
note: The Minister may declare a specified service as a designated interconnection service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

47(2) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration affects the declaration itself.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect

47(3) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
note: Request for ACCC report on proposed declaration promoting objective of any-to-any connectivity
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to request ACCC report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

47(4) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
note: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

47(5) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
note: Minister must consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters when deciding to make a declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of ACC report and other matters.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider other relevant matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister may have regard to such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has permission to consider other relevant matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of ACC report and other matters.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(5) Designated interconnection services

47(6) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
note: Declaration under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

1 Paragraph 152AB(2)(e)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
note: Encourage economically efficient use of infrastructure for listed services.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Paragraph 152AB(2)(e)

2 Paragraph 152AB(6)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
note: Insertion of phrase after 'it is'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-2
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-2005-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-2005
schema version: 2

26 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-26
schema version: 2

3 Subparagraph 152AB(6)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
note: Omit 'or available', substitute 'available or likely to become available'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘available or likely to become available’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'or available'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘or available’

4 Subparagraph 152AB(6)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
note: Insert 'or likely to become reasonable' after 'reasonable'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New word inserted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of new words into a text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
premise text: Text modification

5 Paragraph 152AB(6)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute incentives for investment in infrastructure
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing incentives with new ones
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

6 After subsection 152AB(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(7A) After subsection 152AB(7)
has part: 6(7B) After subsection 152AB(7)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-6
schema version: 2

6(7A) After subsection 152AB(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
note: Must regard risks in investment incentives
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a
schema version: 2
part of: 6 After subsection 152AB(7)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between risk consideration and investment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Risk consideration as a condition for investment incentives
modality: CogAI
operator: IN
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider risks
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Risk consideration as a condition for investment incentives
modality: Diffusion
operator: IN
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between risk consideration and investment
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(7A) After subsection 152AB(7)

6(7B) After subsection 152AB(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
note: Does not limit matters to which regard may be had
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-6-ss-7b
schema version: 2
part of: 6 After subsection 152AB(7)

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Table of sections and commencement provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 January 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: References F2005L04117
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Section 12
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Section 13
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Schedule 11 commencement provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines commencement period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

14 Section 14
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A specific point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

2 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1, effective one day after Royal Assent.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2005-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2005
schema version: 2

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2005-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2005-2
schema version: 2

21 October 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

23 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23 March 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-2
schema version: 2

23 March 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-3
schema version: 2

23 March 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-4
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-3
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-4
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information for the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act 2005
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-5
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-6
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-7
schema version: 2

24 September
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-8
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 2 commencement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
note: Amends or repeals Acts specified in a Schedule according to its terms.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

9 Section 9
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act 2005
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the law relating to telecommunications, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 119 of 2005
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU