Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act 2005
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 119 of 2005
description: An Act to amend the law relating to telecommunications, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-1-norm

2 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2005-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Table of sections and commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-1-2-norm

23 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Schedule 1, effective one day after Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2-3-norm

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Schedule 2 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-3-norm

21 October 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-21-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-4-norm

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-2-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-5-norm

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-3-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 March 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-2-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-7-norm

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-4-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 March 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-3-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-9-norm

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-5
note: Commencement information for the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-5-norm

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 March 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-23-4-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-11-norm

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-6-norm

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-12-norm

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-7-norm

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Schedule 11 commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines commencement period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: References F2005L04117
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-1-3-norm

14 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: A specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-8
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-24-8-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Amends or repeals Acts specified in a Schedule according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-3-2-norm

4 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-4-2-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2005-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sec-2005-2-norm

1 Part 2 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Repeal Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Part 2 of Schedule 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Transitional—clauses 14 and 15 of Schedule 1 to the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Defines pre-commencement reporting period for transitional provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-1-sec-2-norm

1 After subsection 121(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Person may be given direction under subsection (1) in respect of replacement code during period when replacement code is registered.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.9
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 At the end of section 122
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: May be given a formal warning under subsection (2) in respect of the replacement code during the period when the replacement code is registered under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.9
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to be given a formal warning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the person may be given a formal warning
premise text: The period when the replacement code is registered under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-6-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-2005-norm

3 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Prevents conduct from occurring before commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Paragraph 460(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-1-norm

2 Subparagraphs 460(3)(c)(ii) and (iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Omit '90 days', substitute '30 days'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-2-norm

3 After subsection 460(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Declaration under subparagraph (3)(a)(ii) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 After subsection 460(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Declaration is a legislative instrument.
premise text: (3)(a)(ii)
conclusion text: legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Exemptions from amendments for certain variations of numbering plans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-4-norm

8 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-8-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-3-sec-2005-norm

1 Paragraph 151BX(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Prohibit contraventions of the competition rule exceeding 21 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits contraventions of the competition rule exceeding 21 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Application of amendment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Amendment applies to contraventions of competition rule after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Application of amendment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Period began after commencement.
conclusion text: Amendment applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 At the end of subsection 152AS(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Conditional reference to section 152BBAA for judicial enforcement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-1-norm

2 At the end of subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
note: References section for judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations.
references: section 152BBAA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2-norm

3 At the end of subsection 152AT(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
note: References section for judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations.
references: section 152BBAA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-3-norm

4 At the end of subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: References section for judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations.
references: section 152BBAA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-4-norm

5 At the end of section 152BB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Section 152BBAA is not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 At the end of section 152BB
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section does not limit another section.
premise text: This section
conclusion text: Section 152BBAA is not limited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 After section 152BB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: Insert Schedule 5 Enforcement of conditions and limitations of exemption determinations and orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-6-norm

10 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-10-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005
has part: 2005(1) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14

2005(1) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Court may make orders to comply with conditions or limitations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(1) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has obligation to enforce conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(2) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: May discharge or vary an order granted under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to discharge or vary an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(3) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Section does not limit section 152BB.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-5-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section implies other sections.
premise text: Section 2005(3)
conclusion text: Section 152BB is not limited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 At the end of section 152AS
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
note: Reference to Acts Interpretation Act 1901 for variation and revocation of instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-1-norm

2 At the end of section 152ASA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
note: Reference to Acts Interpretation Act 1901 for variation and revocation of instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-2-norm

12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-12-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-6-sec-2005-norm

1 Subsection 25(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
note: Omit specified text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
note: Defines modifications as additions, omissions, and substitutions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2-norm

3 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
note: Definition of Procedural Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Section 152AC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defined
logic summary: Procedural Rules are defined
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defined
logic summary: Class hierarchy for Procedural Rules
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 152AO(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
note: Substitute minor nature variation definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-4-norm

5 After subsection 152AT(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
note: Applicant may modify application before Commission decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 After subsection 152AT(2)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to modify application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 After subsection 152ATA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
note: Applicant may modify application within time allowed by Procedural Rules Schedule 7.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 After subsection 152ATA(2)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to modify application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

7 After subsection 152AU(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
has part: 7(2A) After subsection 152AU(2)
has part: 7(2B) After subsection 152AU(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17

7(2A) After subsection 152AU(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a
part of: 7 After subsection 152AU(2)
note: Commission may refuse application if information not given within time limit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2A) After subsection 152AU(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Commission prohibits applicant from proceeding if information not given within time limit.
premise text: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the applicant does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The excerpt specifies a temporal interval (time limit) within which the information must be given.
premise text: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information;
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The excerpt specifies a recurring trace (time limit) within which the information must be given.
premise text: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information;
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: The excerpt prohibits the applicant from proceeding if information not given within time limit.
premise text: (b) the applicant does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;
conclusion text: the Commission may, by written notice given to the applicant, refuse the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2B) After subsection 152AU(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7-ss-2b
part of: 7 After subsection 152AU(2)
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-7-ss-2b-norm

8 Subsection 152AU(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
has part: 9(2A) After subsection 152BT(2)
has part: 9(2B) After subsection 152BT(2)
has part: 9(2C) After subsection 152BT(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17

9(2A) After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a
part of: 9 After subsection 152BT(2)
note: Commission may reject undertaking if information not given within time limit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2A) After subsection 152BT(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Commission prohibits carrier/provider from failing to provide information within time limit.
premise text: (2A) If the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Commission traces carrier/provider's failure to provide information within time limit.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Carrier/provider is obligated to provide information within time limit.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Commission prohibits carrier/provider from failing to provide information within time limit.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the carrier or provider does not give the Commission the information within that time limit;
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the carrier or provider, reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2B) After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9-ss-2b
part of: 9 After subsection 152BT(2)
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2b-norm

9(2C) After subsection 152BT(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c
part of: 9 After subsection 152BT(2)
note: Effect of rejection decision on subsection 152BU(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: effect
logic summary: Applies effect of decision on subsection 152BU(5)
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal overlap
logic summary: Applies temporal overlap between decisions
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Applies trace between decisions
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Applies diffusion of effects between decisions
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-9-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive processing
logic summary: Applies cognitive processing of decisions
premise text: (2A) decision to reject undertaking
conclusion text: subsection 152BU(5) has effect as if decision had been made under subsection 152BU(2)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 152BT(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
note: Procedural Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-10-norm

14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005
note: Substitute provision for time limit in information giving
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 After subsection 152BU(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
note: Carrier or provider may modify undertaking under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to modify undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12 After subsection 152BY(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
note: Carrier or provider may modify variation under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to modify variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 152BY(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
note: Omit 'of a minor nature' and substitute with a variation of a minor nature under the Procedural Rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of 'of a minor nature'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2
has part: 14(2A) After subsection 152BZ(2)
has part: 14(2B) After subsection 152BZ(2)
has part: 14(2C) After subsection 152BZ(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18

14(2A) After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a
part of: 14 After subsection 152BZ(2)
note: Commission may reject variation if carrier/provider fails to provide information within time limit.
description: Information within time limit allowed by Procedural Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2A) After subsection 152BZ(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of failing to provide information within time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2B) After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b
part of: 14 After subsection 152BZ(2)
note: Prohibits effect of subsection (2A) despite anything in the Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits effect of subsection (2A)
premise text: (2B) Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: despite
logic summary: Temporal relation between subsections
premise text: (2B) Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2C) After subsection 152BZ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2c
part of: 14 After subsection 152BZ(2)
note: Effect of rejecting variation on subsection 152BY(7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-14-2-ss-2c-norm

15 Subsection 152BZ(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-15
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
premise text: If the Procedural Rules do not make provision for or in relation to a time limit...
conclusion text: Omit 'The Commission'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
logic summary: No temporal interval specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

16 After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16
has part: 16(2A) After subsection 152CBB(2)
has part: 16(2B) After subsection 152CBB(2)
has part: 16(2C) After subsection 152CBB(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19

16(2A) After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a
part of: 16 After subsection 152CBB(2)
note: Commission may reject undertaking if information not given within time limit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(2A) After subsection 152CBB(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Commission prohibits giving undertaking if information not provided on time.
premise text: (2A) If the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Excerpt specifies time limit within which information must be provided.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Within
logic summary: Excerpt specifies time limit within which information must be provided.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(2B) After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b
part of: 16 After subsection 152CBB(2)
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
premise text: (2B)
conclusion text: (2A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(2C) After subsection 152CBB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c
part of: 16 After subsection 152CBB(2)
note: Effect of decision to reject undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-ss-2c-logic-linearlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional effect
premise text: (2C) If the Commission makes a decision under subsection (2A)
conclusion text: has effect as if the decision had been made under subsection 152CBC(2)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 152CBB(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-17
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-17-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 After subsection 152CBC(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-18
note: Modify undertaking before Commission decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 After subsection 152CBC(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to modify undertaking
premise text: Commission decision
conclusion text: Modify undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-16-2-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-2-norm

19 After subsection 152CBG(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19
note: Allow modification of variation under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 After subsection 152CBG(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 152CBG(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-20
note: Substitute minor nature variation definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-20-norm

21 After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21
has part: 21(2A) After subsection 152CBH(2)
has part: 21(2B) After subsection 152CBH(2)
has part: 21(2C) After subsection 152CBH(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20

21(2A) After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a
part of: 21 After subsection 152CBH(2)
note: Commission may reject variation if information not given within time limit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2A) After subsection 152CBH(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Commission prohibits rejection of variation if information not given within time limit.
premise text: (2A) If the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;
conclusion text: The Commission may, by written notice given to the person, reject the variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Information must be provided within a specific time interval.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Variation rejection is a recurring process based on information provided within time limit.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Variation rejection diffuses to all parties involved.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Variation rejection classified based on AI analysis of information provided within time limit.
premise text: (2A) If: (a) the Procedural Rules make provision for or in relation to a time limit for giving the information; and (b) the person does not give the Commission the information within the time limit allowed by the Procedural Rules;
conclusion text: The variation is rejected if the person does not provide information within the specified time interval.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2B) After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b
part of: 21 After subsection 152CBH(2)
note: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Subsection (2A) has effect despite anything in this Division.
premise text: (2B)
conclusion text: (2A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2C) After subsection 152CBH(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2c
part of: 21 After subsection 152CBH(2)
note: Effect of decision to reject variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2c-norm

22 Subsection 152CBH(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-22
note: Omit 'The Commission' and substitute with a conditional phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'The Commission'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 After section 152CD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-23
has part: 23(1) After section 152CD
has part: 23(2) After section 152CD
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20

23(1) After section 152CD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 After section 152CD
note: Commission may defer consideration of access undertakings or variations thereof.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to defer consideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) After section 152CD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 After section 152CD
note: Subsection (1) has effect despite anything in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) After section 152CD
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24 At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-24
has part: 24(8) At the end of section 152CLA
has part: 24(9) At the end of section 152CLA
has part: 24(10) At the end of section 152CLA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21

24(8) At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-24-ss-8
part of: 24 At the end of section 152CLA
note: May be displaced or modified by Procedural Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-8-norm

24(9) At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-24-ss-9
part of: 24 At the end of section 152CLA
note: Commission may defer consideration of access dispute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to defer consideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(10) At the end of section 152CLA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-24-ss-10
part of: 24 At the end of section 152CLA
note: Subsection (9) has effect despite anything in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(10) At the end of section 152CLA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-24-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 At the end of section 152DB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-25
note: Displacement or modification of certain paragraphs by Procedural Rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-25-norm

26 At the end of section 152DK
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-26
note: May be displaced or modified by Procedural Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-26-norm

27 At the end of section 152DMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-27
note: Permits modification of subsections (1) to (7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-27-norm

28 After Division 10 of Part XIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-28
note: Procedural Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-28-norm

18 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-18-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-18-2-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-3-norm

20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-20-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-20-2-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-4
has part: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24

2005(2) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: No failure to comply affects instrument validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Instrument exemption from plan compliance
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity
conclusion text: Instrument is exempt from plan compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Plan compliance timing overlap with instrument validity
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times
conclusion text: Plan compliance overlaps with instrument validity in some time intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Instrument validity tracing through plan compliance
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times
conclusion text: Instrument validity is traced through the plan compliance time intervals
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Exemption diffusion to related instruments
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times
conclusion text: Exemption diffuses to related instruments under subsection 152ELA(1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Instrument inference from plan compliance exemption
premise text: Plan non-compliance does not affect instrument validity at all times
conclusion text: Instrument is inferred to be exempt from plan compliance under subsection 152ELA(1)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(3) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Plan is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-7-sec-2005-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: The plan is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 At the end of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-1
note: Add at the end of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-1-norm

44A Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-44a
note: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service from carriage service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-45
note: Definitions for active declared service, designated interconnection service, and eligible service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-45-norm

46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-46
note: Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from carriage service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to obtain designated interconnection services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-22-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005
has part: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26

2005(2) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Designated interconnection service terms and conditions must be agreed upon or determined by an arbitrator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(2) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory obligation on the carrier and carriage service provider.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(3) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Regulations may make provision for arbitration conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(3) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: ACCC may be constituted by a single member or specified number of members for a particular arbitration.
description: Nominations in writing by the Chairperson of the ACCC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: ACCC may be constituted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: No implication that subclause (4) limits subclause (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative implication
premise text: (5) Subclause (4) does not, by implication, limit subclause (3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative implication
premise text: (5) Subclause (4) does not, by implication, limit subclause (3).
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-47
has part: 47(1) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(2) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(3) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(4) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(5) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(6) Designated interconnection services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27

47(1) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: The Minister may declare a specified service as a designated interconnection service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-1-norm

47(2) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Declaration affects the declaration itself.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Request for ACCC report on proposed declaration promoting objective of any-to-any connectivity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request ACCC report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(4) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-4
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(5) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-5
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Minister must consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters when deciding to make a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(5) Designated interconnection services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters.
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider other relevant matters.
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of ACC report and other matters.
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of ACC report and other matters.
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Minister has permission to consider other relevant matters.
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister may have regard to such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(6) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-47-ss-6
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Declaration under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-47-ss-6-norm

24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-24
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-24-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2005-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-8-sec-2005-2-norm

1 Paragraph 152AB(2)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-1
note: Encourage economically efficient use of infrastructure for listed services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Paragraph 152AB(2)(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Paragraph 152AB(6)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-2
note: Insertion of phrase after 'it is'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-2-norm

3 Subparagraph 152AB(6)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-3
note: Omit 'or available', substitute 'available or likely to become available'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'or available'
premise text: Omit ‘or available’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘available or likely to become available’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subparagraph 152AB(6)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4
note: Insert 'or likely to become reasonable' after 'reasonable'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of new words into a text
premise text: Text modification
conclusion text: New word inserted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Paragraph 152AB(6)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute incentives for investment in infrastructure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing incentives with new ones
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 After subsection 152AB(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-6
has part: 6(7A) After subsection 152AB(7)
has part: 6(7B) After subsection 152AB(7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28

6(7A) After subsection 152AB(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a
part of: 6 After subsection 152AB(7)
note: Must regard risks in investment incentives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(7A) After subsection 152AB(7)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider risks
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)
conclusion text: regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal relation between risk consideration and investment
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal relation between risk consideration and investment
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IN
logic summary: Risk consideration as a condition for investment incentives
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IN
logic summary: Risk consideration as a condition for investment incentives
premise text: (7A) For the purposes of paragraph (6)(c)
conclusion text: in determining incentives for investment, regard must be had to the risks involved in making the investment
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(7B) After subsection 152AB(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-6-ss-7b
part of: 6 After subsection 152AB(7)
note: Does not limit matters to which regard may be had
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-6-ss-7b-norm

26 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-26
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-26-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-9-sec-2005-norm

1 Section 6 (after table item 9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-1
note: Enforceable undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-1-norm

2 After Part 31
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-2
note: Insert clause after Part 31
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-2-norm

572A Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572a
note: A person may give an enforceable undertaking about compliance with the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572A Simplified outline
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572B Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b
has part: 572B(1) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(2) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(3) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(4) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(5) Acceptance of undertakings
has part: 572B(6) Acceptance of undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30

572B(1) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings
note: Acceptance of undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
logic summary: Accepts undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572B(2) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-2
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings
note: Expressing an undertaking under section 572B(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-2-norm

572B(3) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings
note: Consent required for withdrawal or variation of undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent
premise text: The person may withdraw or vary the undertaking
conclusion text: only with the consent of ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572B(4) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings
note: Cancellation of undertaking by ACMA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cancel
logic summary: ACMA can cancel the undertaking
premise text: ACMA may, by written notice given to the person
conclusion text: The undertaking is cancelled
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between cancellation and undertaking
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person
conclusion text: Cancellation occurs at a specific time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of cancellation on undertaking
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person
conclusion text: Cancellation implies termination of undertaking
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of cancellation through the system
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person
conclusion text: Cancellation propagates through the system
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference of cancellation from ACMA's action
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person
conclusion text: Cancellation is inferred from ACMA's action
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572B(5) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings
note: ACMA may publish undertaking on its Internet site.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Publish
logic summary: Publishing requirement
premise text: ACMA may publish
conclusion text: on its Internet site
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572B(6) Acceptance of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6
part of: 572B Acceptance of undertakings
note: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the specified act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Classifies as a subclass of this Act
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572C Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572c
has part: 572C(1) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 572C(2) Enforcement of undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.31

572C(1) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1
part of: 572C Enforcement of undertakings
note: Enforcement of breach of undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May apply to Federal Court for order
premise text: ACMA considers breach
conclusion text: Order under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572C(2) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2
part of: 572C Enforcement of undertakings
note: Court may order person to comply with undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572C(2) Enforcement of undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-572c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-28
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-28-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-10-sec-2005-norm

1 Section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-1
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'A carrier licence'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-1-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 61
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 At the end of section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2
has part: 2(2) At the end of section 61
has part: 2(3) At the end of section 61
has part: 2(4) At the end of section 61
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32

2(2) At the end of section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 At the end of section 61
note: Minister may declare Part 8 of Schedule 1 ceases to have effect on a specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Declaration of cessation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) At the end of section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 At the end of section 61
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Declaration has effect.
premise text: (3) A declaration under subsection (2)
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(4) At the end of section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-ss-4
part of: 2 At the end of section 61
note: A declaration under subsection (2) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(4) At the end of section 61
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Declaration is a legislative instrument.
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Declaration is applicable during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
premise text: (4) A declaration under subsection (2)
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 After section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-3
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-3-norm

61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a
has part: 61A(1) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(2) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(3) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(4) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
has part: 61A(5) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32

61A(1) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
note: Minister must conduct review of Part 8 operation before July 2009.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A(1) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(2) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
note: Must consider specific matters when reviewing conditions relating to operational separation of Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A(2) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider specific matters
premise text: (2) A review under subsection (1) must have regard to the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(3) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
note: Minister must prepare report after review under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A(3) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must perform action
conclusion text: The Minister MUST cause to be prepared a report...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(4) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
note: Table report in Parliament within 15 sitting days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to table report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(5) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5
part of: 61A Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
note: Defines terms for review of conditions relating to operational activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A(5) Review before 1 July 2009 of conditions relating to operational
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 After section 69
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-4-norm

69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a
has part: 69A(1) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
has part: 69A(2) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
has part: 69A(3) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33

69A(1) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1
part of: 69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
note: Remedial directions for breach of conditions relating to Telstra's actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra.
conclusion text: Telstra must comply with the conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A(2) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2
part of: 69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
note: Telstra must take specified action to prevent future breach of conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to take specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A(3) Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69a-ss-3
part of: 69A Remedial directions—breach by Telstra of conditions relating
note: Examples of direction that may be given to Telstra under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69a-ss-3-norm

30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-30
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-30-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(6) No. 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: No contravention of a direction under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: (4) Telstra must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: No legislative instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (5) A direction under subsection (2)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(6) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Section does not limit section 69.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Section implies other section
premise text: Section 69
conclusion text: Section does not limit Section 69
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b
has part: 69B(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(7) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
has part: 69B(8) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34

69B(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: Right to review ACCC direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Right to apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: Application for review of a section 69A direction must be made in writing within 7 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69B(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for review must be made in writing within 7 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Review application must be made within 7 days after the ACCC gave the direction.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Application for review must be made within a temporal interval of 7 days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: Must review direction on application for review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: The Australian Competition Tribunal may make a decision affirming, setting aside, or varying a section 69A direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal is taken to be a decision of the ACCC for certain purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69B(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Decision is taken to be a decision of the ACCC
premise text: (5) A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: ACCC must provide information, reports, and assistance to the Tribunal as specified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information, reports, and assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(7) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: May consider information given to the ACCC in connection with a section 69A direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May consider information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: regard to
logic summary: Consider relevant information
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: may have regard to
logic summary: Temporal consideration of information
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B(8) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8
part of: 69B Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal of remedial
note: Division 2 of Part IX applies to proceedings before the Australian Competition Tribunal under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-69b-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division 2 of Part IX applies to proceedings before the Australian Competition Tribunal under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 After paragraph 70(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-5
note: Condition for carrier Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-5-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 After paragraph 70(5)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 At the end of section 70
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-6
note: No limitation on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-6-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 At the end of section 70
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 At the end of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-7
note: Operational separation of Telstra at the end of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-7-norm

32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-32
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-32-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-2-norm

48 Aim and objects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-48
has part: 48(1) Aim and objects
has part: 48(2) Aim and objects
has part: 48(3) Aim and objects
has part: 48(4) Aim and objects
has part: 48(5) Aim and objects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36

48(1) Aim and objects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 Aim and objects
note: Promote transparency and equivalence in wholesale services supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(1) Aim and objects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to promote transparency and equivalence
premise text: (1) The aim of this Part is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) Aim and objects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 Aim and objects
note: Promote a principle of equivalence in relation to the supply by Telstra of designated services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Promote a principle of equivalence in relation to the supply by Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(3) Aim and objects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-3
part of: 48 Aim and objects
note: Regard must be had to terms and conditions relating to price or a method of ascertaining price.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(3) Aim and objects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regard must be had to terms and conditions relating to price or a method of ascertaining price.
premise text: (3) In determining the principle of equivalence covered by paragraph (2)(a), regard must be had to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for regarding terms and conditions.
premise text: regard must be had to:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(4) Aim and objects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-4
part of: 48 Aim and objects
note: Regard may be had to matters not limited by subclause (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-4-norm

48(5) Aim and objects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-48-ss-5
part of: 48 Aim and objects
note: Must consider the needs of wholesale customers in relation to eligible services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider the needs of wholesale customers.
premise text: The needs of wholesale customers must be considered.
conclusion text: Obligation to consider the needs of wholesale customers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-34
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-34-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-3
note: No limitation on matters to which regard may be had
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-3-norm

49 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-49
note: Prepare operational separation plans and comply with rectification plans.
description: Draft operational separation plan, Draft rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-49-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare plans
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50
note: Definitions for Telstra business units and services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50-norm

50A Designated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a
has part: 50A(1) Designated services
has part: 50A(2) Designated services
has part: 50A(3) Designated services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39

50A(1) Designated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1
part of: 50A Designated services
note: Definition of designated service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(1) Designated services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Written determination
premise text: Minister
conclusion text: Eligible service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A(2) Designated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2
part of: 50A Designated services
note: Minister cannot make a determination without Telstra's consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making a determination without consent
premise text: Minister's action
conclusion text: Telstra's consent required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A(3) Designated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3
part of: 50A Designated services
note: Applicability of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to Minister's power
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(3) Designated services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Minister's power is subject to Acts Interpretation Act 1901
premise text: (3) Subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 applies
conclusion text: to a power conferred on the Minister by subclause (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-36
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-36-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(6) No. 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Minister cannot vary determination without Telstra's consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of varying determination
premise text: Minister must not vary
conclusion text: without Telstra's consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Consultation requirement before making a determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult Telstra
premise text: (5) Before making a determination under subclause (1)
conclusion text: The Minister MUST consult Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(6) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-6
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-4-ss-6-norm

50B Declared network services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50b
has part: 50B(1) Declared network services
has part: 50B(2) Declared network services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40

50B(1) Declared network services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1
part of: 50B Declared network services
note: Defines declared network service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the scope of the term
premise text: For the purposes of this Part
conclusion text: Declared network service is a service specified in a written determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50B(2) Declared network services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2
part of: 50B Declared network services
note: A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies provision as undertaking
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: The provision is classified as an undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: The provision specifies a temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies relation between instruments
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: The provision specifies a relation between instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Validates data format
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: The provision validates data format.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Analyzes language usage
premise text: (2) A determination under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: The provision analyzes language usage.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

50C Notional contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-50c
note: Treat notional contracts as actual contracts for Telstra's business units.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-50c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra's business units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-51
has part: 51(1) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
has part: 51(2) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
has part: 51(3) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
has part: 51(4) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40

51(1) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
note: Telstra must prepare and report on compliance with the operational separation plan.
description: Annual reports and independent audit reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Requires reporting within a specified period after each financial year
premise text: (i) within a specified period after the end of each financial year, to prepare a report about the extent to which Telstra complied with the plan during that year;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty to give reports to the Minister
premise text: (ii) to give the report to the Minister;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty to make reports available on the Internet site
premise text: (iii) to make a copy of the report, or extracts from the report, available on Telstra’s Internet site;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
note: Manner of meeting paragraph (1)(b) or (c) requirement is not limited by subclause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-2-norm

51(3) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
note: Empowers Minister, ACCC or ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: empower
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to administrative decisions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(4) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-51-ss-4
part of: 51 Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
note: A determination under paragraph (1)(d) is a legislative instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(4) Contents of draft or final operational separation plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
premise text: (4) A determination under paragraph (1)(d) is a legislative instrument
conclusion text: A legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of final operational separation plan
premise text: A final operational separation plan is a draft operational separation plan that has been approved by the Minister—see clause 55.
conclusion text: A final operational separation plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of draft operational separation plan
premise text: (4) A determination under paragraph (1)(d) is a legislative instrument
conclusion text: A draft operational separation plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

52 Draft operational separation plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-52
note: Must provide draft operational separation plan to Minister within 90 days
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-52-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-52-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Public comment—draft operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-53
note: Publish a notice in a newspaper before submitting an operational separation plan
description: Notice to be published
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Publish a notice in a newspaper before submitting an operational separation plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-53-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication
premise text: Before submitting an operational separation plan
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-38
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-38-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-5
note: Provide a copy of the preliminary version on the Internet site within 30 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the preliminary version on the Internet site.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The provision has a temporal interval of at least 30 days.
premise text: (i) and (ii)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54
has part: 54(1) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(2) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(3) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(4) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(5) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(6) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(7) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(8) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(9) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 54(10) Approval of draft by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42

54(1) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Telstra must give the Minister a draft operational separation plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must approve or refuse plan approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(3) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-3
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Plan is a temporal interval that the Minister considers.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Minister's decision implies consideration of certain matters.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Minister's consideration spreads to other matters.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the plan, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(4) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-4
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: The Minister may have regard for matters beyond the scope of subclause (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-4-norm

54(5) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-5
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister's approval within 90 days is deemed approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister's obligation to approve plan within 90 days.
premise text: Minister received draft plan.
conclusion text: Minister approved plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Plan is approved within 90 days of receipt.
premise text: Minister received draft plan.
conclusion text: Minister approved plan.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(6) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-6
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of decision to approve plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(7) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-7
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
description: Reasons for refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the Minister’s reasons for the refusal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(8) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-8
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Direct Telstra to vary the draft plan and provide it within 60 days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Direct Telstra to vary the draft plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(9) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-9
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(9) Approval of draft by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Determination is an obligation.
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Determination made during the legislative process.
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) was made during the legislative process.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: is
logic summary: Determination is an argument for the legislative process.
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is an argument for the legislative process.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
logic summary: Determination spreads to other parts of the legislation.
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument that spreads to other parts of the legislation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is
logic summary: Determination is an artificial intelligence application.
premise text: (9) A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is an artificial intelligence application.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(10) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-54-ss-10
part of: 54 Approval of draft by Minister
note: A direction under subclause (8) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(10) Approval of draft by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-54-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-55
has part: 55(1) Effect of approval
has part: 55(2) Effect of approval
has part: 55(3) Effect of approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43

55(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Effect of approval
note: Plan becomes final upon approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Effect of approval
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
logic summary: Plan becomes final.
premise text: (1) If the Minister approves a draft operational separation plan, the plan becomes a final operational separation plan.
conclusion text: The final operational separation plan comes into force at the time when Telstra is notified of the approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Effect of approval
note: Plan is not a legislative instrument for certain purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) A final operational separation plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: A final operational separation plan is a legislative instrument for certain purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Effect of approval
note: Compliance with a final operational separation plan is not required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(3) Effect of approval
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (3) Compliance with a final operational separation plan is not a condition of Telstra’s carrier licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56 Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56
has part: 56(1) Variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 56(2) Variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 56(3) Variation of final operational separation plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43

56(1) Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Variation of final operational separation plan
note: Variation of final operational separation plan requires Telstra's draft variation to be given to the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional commencement.
premise text: (a) a final operational separation plan is in force; and (b) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement for action.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56-ss-2
part of: 56 Variation of final operational separation plan
note: Must approve or refuse variation of final operational separation plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve or refuse variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56-ss-3
part of: 56 Variation of final operational separation plan
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a variation of the final operational separation plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(3) Variation of final operational separation plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-40
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-40-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6
has part: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(5) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(6) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(7) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(8) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(10) No. 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44

2005(4) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Minister may have regard to matters not limited by subclause (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(4) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.
conclusion text: The Minister must consider these matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: have regard
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval between the Minister and matters
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.
conclusion text: The Minister has an interval of having regard to these matters
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: may
logic summary: Describes a trace between the Minister and matters
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.
conclusion text: The Minister has a trace of having regard to these matters
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
logic summary: Describes a diffusion between the Minister and matters
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.
conclusion text: The Minister has a diffusion of having regard to these matters
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: may
logic summary: Describes a cognitive relation between the Minister and matters
premise text: (4) Subclause (3) does not limit the matters to which the Minister may have regard.
conclusion text: The Minister has a cognitive relation of having regard to these matters
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(5) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Minister's approval within 90 days is deemed approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister's obligation to approve variation within 90 days.
premise text: Minister received draft variation.
conclusion text: Minister approved variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Variation approval period overlaps with 90-day deadline.
premise text: Minister received draft variation before end of 90 days.
conclusion text: Minister approved variation under subclause (2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Variation approval implies Minister's obligation to approve within 90 days.
premise text: Minister approved variation.
conclusion text: Minister received draft variation before end of 90 days.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Variation approval propagates to Minister's subsequent actions.
premise text: Minister neither approves nor refuses to approve variation.
conclusion text: Minister approved variation under subclause (2).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Variation approval inference from Minister's obligation.
premise text: Minister received draft variation before end of 90 days.
conclusion text: Minister approved variation under subclause (2).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(6) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Notify Telstra of decision to approve variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(7) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Minister must notify Telstra of reasons for refusal.
description: Reasons for refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(8) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-8
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: Conditional variation of a plan upon Minister's approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-8-norm

2005(9) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(10) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: No variation of a final operational separation plan is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits variations of final operational separation plans from being legislative instruments.
premise text: (10) A variation of a final operational separation plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a
has part: 56A(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
has part: 56A(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
has part: 56A(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44

56A(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a-ss-1
part of: 56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation plan if in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56A(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56A(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2
part of: 56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
note: Minister may direct Telstra to prepare a draft variation of the plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-56a-ss-3
part of: 56A Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-56a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56A(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final operational separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-57
has part: 57(1) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 57(2) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 57(3) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
has part: 57(4) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45

57(1) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-1
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
note: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(1) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide draft variation of final operational separation plan
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister after certain conditions are met
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister before certain conditions are met
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan must be given to the Minister and previously communicated to Telstra under certain conditions
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Draft variation of final operational separation plan is a type of draft variation
premise text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
conclusion text: (1) This clause applies to a draft variation of a final operational separation plan unless: (a) the draft variation was given to the Minister as a result of a direction under subclause 56A(2); or (b) both: (i) Telstra had previously given the Minister a written outline of the draft variation; and (ii) the Minister, by written notice given to Telstra, had informed Telstra that the Minister was satisfied that the draft variation was of a minor nature.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(2) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-2
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
note: Publish notice and make preliminary version available online
description: Written comments within 20 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and make preliminary version available online
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(3) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-3
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
note: Must provide written comments with draft variation
description: Comments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide comments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(4) Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-57-ss-4
part of: 57 Public comment—variation of final operational separation plan
note: Notice under subparagraph (1)(b)(ii) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-57-ss-4-norm

42 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-42
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-42-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-7-norm

58 Publication of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-58
has part: 58(1) Publication of final operational separation plan
has part: 58(2) Publication of final operational separation plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46

58(1) Publication of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Publication of final operational separation plan
note: Make a copy of the final operational separation plan available on Telstra's Internet site.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a copy of the plan available
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Publication of final operational separation plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Publication of final operational separation plan
note: Publish varied final operational separation plan on Internet site
description: Copy of varied final operational separation plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish
conclusion text: Telstra must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Contents of draft or final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-59
has part: 59(1) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
has part: 59(2) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46

59(1) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-59-ss-1
part of: 59 Contents of draft or final rectification plan
note: Matters to be set out in a draft or final rectification plan
description: (a) the action to be taken by Telstra to ensure that the contravention ceases; (b) the action to be taken by Telstra directed towards ensuring that there is no repetition of the contravention in the future; (c) the action to be taken by Telstra by way of reporting to the Minister on any action taken by it as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: (a) the action to be taken by Telstra to ensure that the contravention ceases;
conclusion text: Telstra MUST set out this matter in each draft or final rectification plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting action taken by Telstra
premise text: (c) the action to be taken by Telstra by way of reporting to the Minister on any action taken by it as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
conclusion text: This action is BETWEEN taking action to cease contravention and ensuring no repetition.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation for Telstra to report action taken
premise text: (c) the action to be taken by Telstra by way of reporting to the Minister on any action taken by it as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
conclusion text: Telstra MUST report this action to the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation for Telstra to take action to cease contravention
premise text: (a) the action to be taken by Telstra to ensure that the contravention ceases;
conclusion text: Telstra MUST take this action to cease contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(2) Contents of draft or final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-59-ss-2
part of: 59 Contents of draft or final rectification plan
note: Empowers Minister, ACCC or ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: empower
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-60
has part: 60(1) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
has part: 60(2) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
has part: 60(3) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
has part: 60(4) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46

60(1) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-1
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
note: Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a draft rectification plan
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Draft rectification plan timing not specified
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Draft rectification plan implies Minister involvement
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Draft rectification plan is related to Minister
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Draft rectification plan is related to Minister
premise text: (1) This clause applies if Telstra has contravened, or is contravening, a final operational separation plan.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60(2) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-2
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
note: Minister may give Telstra a written direction requiring a draft rectification plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(3) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-3
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
note: Comply with direction within 90 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: (3) Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days after the day on which the direction was given.
conclusion text: Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (3) Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days after the day on which the direction was given.
conclusion text: If the direction is given, then Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ∈
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (3) Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days after the day on which the direction was given.
conclusion text: The period of 90 days is a temporal interval during which Telstra must comply with the direction
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: (3) The Minister may give directions.
conclusion text: If the Minister gives a direction, then Telstra must comply with the direction within 90 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(4) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-60-ss-4
part of: 60 Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
note: A direction under this clause is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(4) Draft rectification plan to be given to Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Direction is a legislative instrument.
premise text: (4) A direction under this clause...
conclusion text: A direction under this clause is a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61
has part: 61(1) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(2) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(3) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(4) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(5) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(6) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(7) Approval of draft by Minister
has part: 61(8) Approval of draft by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47

61(1) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Telstra must provide a draft rectification plan to the Minister.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must approve or refuse plan approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(3) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-3
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation.
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the following matters.
conclusion text: The Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Plan approval involves temporal consideration.
premise text: the Minister must have regard to the following matters:
conclusion text: The plan approval involves considering future actions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(4) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-4
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: The Minister may have regard for matters beyond the scope of subclause (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-4-norm

61(5) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-5
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister's approval within 90 days is deemed approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister's obligation to approve plan within 90 days.
premise text: Minister received draft plan.
conclusion text: Minister approved plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(6) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-6
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between notification and decision
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the plan,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(7) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-7
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
description: Reasons for refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to notify Telstra.
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the Minister’s reasons for the refusal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(8) Approval of draft by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-61-ss-8
part of: 61 Approval of draft by Minister
note: Direct Telstra to vary the draft plan and provide it within 60 days.
description: Variated draft plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-61-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister's obligation to direct Telstra
conclusion text: Telstra must vary the draft plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-44
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-44-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-8
has part: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005
has part: 2005(10) No. 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48

2005(9) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(9) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: The determination under paragraph (3)(b) applies during the period specified in subsection (2)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2005(10) No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
note: A direction under subclause (8) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005(10) No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)
conclusion text: is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)
conclusion text: occurs during the legislative instruments for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication on the definition of a legislative instrument
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)
conclusion text: implies that it is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
logic summary: Spread of the definition to other contexts
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)
conclusion text: spreads to other contexts as a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-8-ss-10-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (10) A direction under subclause (8)
conclusion text: can be applied by artificial intelligence as a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-62
has part: 62(1) Effect of approval
has part: 62(2) Effect of approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48

62(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Effect of approval
note: Plan becomes final upon approval and takes effect upon notification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(1) Effect of approval
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
logic summary: Plan becomes final
premise text: Approval is given
conclusion text: Plan is final
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: when
logic summary: Plan takes effect upon notification
premise text: Notification occurs
conclusion text: Plan takes effect
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Effect of approval
note: Plan is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: A final rectification plan is an instrument that must be made in accordance with the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to Act
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: The plan must be made during the period in which the Act applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to Act
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: The plan must be made during the period in which the Act applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Equivalence to legislative instrument
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: A final rectification plan is an instrument that must be made in accordance with the Act if and only if it meets certain criteria.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-62-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Equivalence to legislative instrument
premise text: (2) A final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: A final rectification plan is an instrument that must be made in accordance with the Act if and only if it meets certain criteria.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63
has part: 63(1) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(2) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(3) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(4) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(5) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(6) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(7) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(8) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(9) Variation of final rectification plan
has part: 63(10) Variation of final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48

63(1) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: Variation of final rectification plan obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Obligation to provide variation of final rectification plan
premise text: (1) This clause applies if: (a) a final rectification plan is in force; and (b) the plan relates to a particular contravention; and (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.
conclusion text: Telstra must provide a draft variation of the plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan during specific period
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.
conclusion text: The variation of the final rectification plan is given during this period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan implies specific action by Minister
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.
conclusion text: The Minister must take action based on this draft variation of the plan
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan diffuses to Minister
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.
conclusion text: The information about the draft variation of the plan is diffused to the Minister
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Variation of final rectification plan recognized by AI system
premise text: (c) Telstra gives the Minister a draft variation of the plan.
conclusion text: The AI system recognizes this draft variation of the plan
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: Must approve or refuse variation of final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve or refuse variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(3) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-3
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: Minister must consider certain matters when deciding to approve a variation of the final rectification plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Minister must consider matters during the decision-making process.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must have regard to the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: consider
logic summary: Minister must consider the specified matters in making a decision.
premise text: (a) the extent to which the action proposed to be taken by Telstra under the plan as proposed to be varied will be likely to ensure that...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must consider
logic summary: Minister must take into account the specified matters.
premise text: (a) the extent to which the action proposed to be taken by Telstra under the plan as proposed to be varied will be likely to ensure that...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must consider
logic summary: Minister must take into account the specified matters.
premise text: (a) the extent to which the action proposed to be taken by Telstra under the plan as proposed to be varied will be likely to ensure that...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(4) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-4
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: The Minister may have regard to matters beyond the scope of subclause (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(4) Variation of final rectification plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63(5) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-5
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: Minister must approve variation within 90 days or take action at end of period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must approve variation
premise text: Minister neither approves nor refuses to approve variation
conclusion text: Minister must approve variation within 90 days or take action at end of period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Variation must be approved within 90 days after receipt of draft variation
premise text: The Minister received the draft variation
conclusion text: The variation must be approved within 90 days after receipt of draft variation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Minister's inaction implies failure to approve variation
premise text: Minister neither approves nor refuses to approve variation
conclusion text: Minister's inaction implies failure to approve variation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
premise text: The Minister received the draft variation
conclusion text: The variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
premise text: The Minister received the draft variation
conclusion text: The variation is a plan for operational separation of Telstra
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(6) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-6
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: Notify Telstra of decision to approve variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify Telstra
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Decision implies notification
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISTRIBUTIVE
logic summary: Notification affects Telstra
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ENTAILS
logic summary: Decision entails notification
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after deciding whether to approve the variation, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the decision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(7) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-7
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
description: Reasons for refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify Telstra
conclusion text: Minister must notify Telstra in writing of reasons for refusal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(8) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-8
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: Minister must approve variation to the final rectification plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(8) Variation of final rectification plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister's approval is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(9) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-9
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-cogai-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-shacl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-n3logic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(9) Variation of final rectification plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument during the period of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
logic summary: Validation of the definition
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-9-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: is-a
logic summary: RDF classification
premise text: Legislative Instruments Act 2003
conclusion text: A determination under paragraph (3)(b) is a legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(10) Variation of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-63-ss-10
part of: 63 Variation of final rectification plan
note: A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-linearlogic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (10) A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: A variation of a final rectification plan is an obligation to comply with the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on classification
premise text: (10) A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: It is forbidden to classify a variation of a final rectification plan as a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-63-ss-10-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (10) A variation of a final rectification plan is not a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
conclusion text: If a variation of a final rectification plan is not classified as a legislative instrument, then it implies an obligation to comply with the Act.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-64
has part: 64(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
has part: 64(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
has part: 64(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49

64(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(1) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
note: Minister directs Telstra to prepare a draft variation of the plan within 60 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to direct Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-64-ss-3
part of: 64 Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
note: Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(3) Minister may direct Telstra to vary final rectification plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

65 Compliance with final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-65
note: Compliance with final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-65-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-46
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-46-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2005-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-2005-9-norm

66 Publication of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-66
has part: 66(1) Publication of final rectification plan
has part: 66(2) Publication of final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50

66(1) Publication of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-66-ss-1
part of: 66 Publication of final rectification plan
note: Publish final rectification plan on Internet site
description: Copy of the plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish
conclusion text: Telstra must publish the plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between plan publication and Internet site availability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

66(2) Publication of final rectification plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-66-ss-2
part of: 66 Publication of final rectification plan
note: Publish final rectification plan on Internet site after variation comes into force
description: Copy of varied final rectification plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 At the end of Part XIB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-8
note: Add at the end of Part XIB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-8-norm

151CP Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-151cp
has part: 151CP(1) Operational separation for Telstra
has part: 151CP(2) Operational separation for Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50

151CP(1) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1
part of: 151CP Operational separation for Telstra
note: Telstra must comply with the final operational separation plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151CP(2) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2
part of: 151CP Operational separation for Telstra
note: Must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's functions or powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: Obligation to consider conduct relevant to Telstra's functions or powers.
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN A TIMEFRAME
logic summary: Temporal relationship between conduct and consideration.
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
logic summary: Relevance of conduct to Telstra's functions or powers.
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS SPREAD TO
logic summary: Spread of consideration to conduct.
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-151cp-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
logic summary: Relevance of conduct to Telstra's functions or powers.
premise text: (2) In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part in relation to Telstra...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 After section 152EP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-9
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-9-norm

152EQ Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-152eq
has part: 152EQ(1) Operational separation for Telstra
has part: 152EQ(2) Operational separation for Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50

152EQ(1) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1
part of: 152EQ Operational separation for Telstra
note: Telstra must comply with a final operational separation plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152EQ(2) Operational separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2
part of: 152EQ Operational separation for Telstra
note: Must have regard to conduct relevant to the function or power under this Part in relation to Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-11-sec-152eq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The Commission must have regard to the conduct.
conclusion text: regard to the conduct is relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 After subsection 152CPA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-1
note: Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness in making interim determination under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 After subsection 152CPA(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from procedural fairness
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.
conclusion text: Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Subclass of determinations with consistent price-related terms and conditions
premise text: Price-related terms and conditions in interim determination are consistent with those in section 152AQA or 152AQB determination.
conclusion text: Interim determination is a subclass of determinations with consistent price-related terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which procedural fairness is not required
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is not required during this temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until which procedural fairness is not required
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is not required until this temporal interval ends.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Condition for exemption from procedural fairness
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.
conclusion text: Exemption from procedural fairness applies if this condition is met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: and
logic summary: Combination of conditions for exemption from procedural fairness
premise text: Declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA or 152AQB.
conclusion text: Exemption from procedural fairness applies if both conditions are met.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 After subsection 152CPA(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-2
note: Commission may extend interim determination period under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 After subsection 152CPA(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commission has the power to extend interim determination period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-48
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-48-norm

2005 No. 119, 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-2005
note: No procedural fairness requirement for granting extensions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2005 No. 119, 2005
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-2005-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to grant extensions without procedural fairness
premise text: (5B) The Commission is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 At the end of section 152CPA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-3
note: The Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness in relation to the variation under subsection (10) of an interim determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 At the end of section 152CPA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from procedural fairness
premise text: The Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-12-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Subclass of interim determination
premise text: the declared service is covered by a determination in force under section 152AQA;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 At the end of section 69
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-1
note: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: A direction under subsection (2) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative prohibition
premise text: It is prohibited that a direction under subsection (2) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative right
premise text: It is not the case that a direction under subsection (2) is a right.
conclusion text: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 At the end of section 102
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-2
note: Legislative instrument exemption
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 At the end of section 102
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Exemption from legislative instruments
premise text: The direction is not a legislative instrument
conclusion text: Exempted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 At the end of section 121
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-3
note: Legislative instrument exemption
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 At the end of section 121
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-issues-act-2005-sch-13-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts legislative instruments from the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed