1 Subsection 3ZL(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
note: Omit 'fingerprints or', substitute 'fingerprints and/or'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.14
note: Does not preclude CrimTrac from entering into a memorandum of understanding or other arrangement with participating jurisdictions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

12 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

2 After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(3A) After subsection 3ZL(3)
has part: 2(3B) After subsection 3ZL(3)
has part: 2(3C) After subsection 3ZL(3)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

2(3A) After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
note: Order to attend a specified police station at a specified time.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After subsection 3ZL(3)

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must attend the police station at a specified time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the order and the action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must attend the police station at a specified time if ordered to do so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of the order on the person's actions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order is represented as a legal obligation in the knowledge base.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of the order as a legal obligation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must attend the specified police station at the specified time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation to attend a police station.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order propagates to require the person to attend the police station at a specified time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated effect of the order on the person's actions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(3A) After subsection 3ZL(3)

2(3B) After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an order is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After subsection 3ZL(3)

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s conduct contravenes the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3B) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(3B) After subsection 3ZL(3)

2(3C) After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
note: Defines conduct as an act or omission.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 2 After subsection 3ZL(3)

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to the definition of conduct.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(3C) After subsection 3ZL(3)

3 Paragraph 3ZM(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.10
note: Refusal to participate in a parade cannot be used as evidence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using refusal to participate in a parade as evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4 Subsection 4J(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
note: Substitute amount in subsection 4J(4)
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

4JA Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4JA(1) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
has part: 4JA(2) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4ja
schema version: 2

4JA(1) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
note: Court may hear and determine indictable offence under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4JA Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt specifies temporal interval for pecuniary penalty.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the pecuniary penalty for the offence is not more than 600 penalty units for an individual or 3,000 penalty units for a body corporate;

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits hearing and determination of indictable offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) A court of summary jurisdiction may hear and determine an indictable offence if:

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has obligation to hear and determine indictable offence under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (c) the defendant and prosecution consent.

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt specifies recurring trace of pecuniary penalty.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (b) the pecuniary penalty for the offence is not more than 600 penalty units for an individual or 3,000 penalty units for a body corporate;

4JA(2) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
note: Maximum pecuniary penalty for certain offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4JA Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal bounds for pecuniary penalties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Bound
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes entities (offences and penalties) in the provision
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits pecuniary penalties exceeding specified amounts
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for pecuniary penalties
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates schema for pecuniary penalties
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:

5 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
note: Amendment of subsection 4J(4) applies to indictable offences committed after the start of the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 After section 4J
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

7 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12
note: Section applies to proceedings for an offence instituted after the Act received Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to proceedings for an offence instituted after the Act received Royal Assent.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Application

7A Section 23YDAF (table item 7, column 8)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
note: Substitute 'yes' for 'no'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute 'yes' for 'no'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

7B Section 23YUA (definition of corresponding law)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal definition, substitute corresponding law means a law that relates to forensic procedures and DNA databases.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7b
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition substitution
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute

7C Section 23YUA (definition of DNA database)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal the definition of DNA database
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7c
schema version: 2

7D Subsection 23YUD(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
note: Transmit information between jurisdictions for investigation purposes
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7d
schema version: 2

7E At the end of section 23YUD
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.14
note: Definition of CrimTrac Agency and investigation
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7e
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CrimTrac is the CrimTrac Agency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for CrimTrac Agency
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: CrimTrac means the CrimTrac Agency, established as an Executive Agency by the Governor-General by order under section 65 of the Public Service Act 1999.

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: investigation of a matter is defined as specified in this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Investigation definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: investigation of a matter means: ...

7F Transitional provision for existing arrangements under
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.14
note: Continues existing arrangements under subsection 23YUD(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 as amended by this Schedule.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7f
schema version: 2

8 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(3) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
has part: 8(4) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Paragraph 16A(2)(f)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.15
note: Modify text of section 16A(2)(f)
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

8(3) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12
note: Subject to contrary intention indicated by the law creating the offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003

8(4) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12
note: Exempts certain indictable offences from the Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain indictable offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

9 Paragraph 19AS(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.15
note: Substitute 'federal,' for 'federal' in Schedule 2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

1 Subsection 8(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
note: Substitution of text in subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

12 Section 80
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
note: Insertion of section 47C after section 47A
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
note: Amendment applies in relation to escape of a person after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
note: Must deliver person to foreign police custody and hold in custody until delivered.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Item 7 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
note: Insert '(wherever occurring)' after 'court'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Item 7 of Schedule 1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a must cause the person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deliver and hold in custody
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2A)

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003

15 Subsection 22(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
note: Omit specific phrase from text
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Replaces text within specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Replaces text with new version
modality: CogAI
operator: Text replacement
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Replaces text with new version
modality: Diffusion
operator: Text replacement
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Replaces text within specific time frame
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’

16 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
note: Omit ‘and of the Northern Territory’ from section headings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Subsections 22(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal subsections
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘and of the Northern Territory’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16A After section 267
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16a
schema version: 2

16B At the end of subsection 278(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
note: Disposal of property necessary to pay debts
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16b
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to dispose of property
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

16C At the end of section 279
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16C(3) At the end of section 279
has part: 16C(4) At the end of section 279
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16c
schema version: 2

16C(3) At the end of section 279
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
note: Object to disposal of controlled property under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16C At the end of section 279

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16C(3) At the end of section 279

16C(4) At the end of section 279
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
note: Specify item or items of controlled property to be disposed of and portion not objected to.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 16C At the end of section 279

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify item or items of controlled property to be disposed of and portion not objected to.
modality: Deontic
operator: specify

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16C(4) At the end of section 279

16D After subsection 280(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
note: Court must make order to dispose of controlled property.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16d
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16D After subsection 280(4)

16E Section 338 (at the end of the definition of controlled
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Division 3 of Part 4-1.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16e
schema version: 2

17 Item 4 of Schedule 19
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Corrects a misdescribed amendment of the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
note: No summary available
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of authority)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Note: Section 81A alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Part 5.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

19 Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of tribunal)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Part 5.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

1A Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of police
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
note: Member of a foreign police force is also considered a police officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member of a foreign police force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion in definition
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Definition of police officer

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1A Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of police

1AA Section 2 (table item 5, column 2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
note: Substitute Communications Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2003 for 2002
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1aa
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace Act with new version
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1AA Section 2 (table item 5, column 2)

1B Paragraph 18(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a new provision
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1b
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Crime Commission or a member of its staff
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1C Subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(i)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
note: Repeal a subparagraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1c
schema version: 2

1D Paragraph 794C(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with a new provision
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1d
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of the Chief Executive Officer or ACC staff
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1D Paragraph 794C(5)(b)

1E Paragraph 823C(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a new provision
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1e
schema version: 2

1F Paragraph 823CA(4)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1f
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 6A(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
note: Omit 'law in force in the Northern Territory' and substitute 'law of the Northern Territory'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 3(1) (definition of warrant)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Insertion of exception in definition of warrant
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.24
note: Authority includes bodies or persons that may issue warrants for arrest and return to custody.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority includes bodies or persons that may issue warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Authority is defined by the regulations.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003

21 Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of warrant)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Part 5.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 After section 81
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

267A Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
note: Duties under Division 3 apply to the Official Trustee.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-267a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duties under Division 3 apply to the Official Trustee.
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 267A Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers

3 Subsection 6A(7) (definition of criminal act)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
note: Omit 'law in force in the Northern Territory', substitute 'law of the Northern Territory'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Replaces 'law in force' with 'law'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If omitting 'law in force' is not allowed, then substitute 'law of the Northern Territory'
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Uses context to infer substitution of 'law of the Northern Territory'
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'law in force in the Northern Territory'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Replaces 'law in force' with 'law'
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’

4 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
note: Amendments apply after Royal Assent
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Application

4A Subsection 33(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
note: Insertion of condition after 'must'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A Subsection 33(2)

4B After subsection 33(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
note: Insert Schedule 2 Amendment of other Acts
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4b
schema version: 2

5 Paragraph 10(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
note: Corrects misdescribed amendment of section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Paragraph 17(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
note: Corrects misdescribed amendment of section 21B of the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

6A Section 4 (after paragraph (a) of the definition of the
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a
schema version: 2

6B Paragraph 6(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
note: Omit 'and the Northern Territory,' and substitute 'the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6b
schema version: 2

6C Paragraph 6(hb)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6D Subsection 35(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
note: Omit “8”, substitute “9”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6d
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits amendment of other Acts
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6E After paragraph 35(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Must represent the Australian Capital Territory
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6e
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to represent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6E After paragraph 35(1)(b)

6F Subsection 35(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Omit or substitute a specific phrase in subsection 35(3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6f
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between omitting and substituting
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies reasoning to the phrase substitution
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting or substituting a phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to related phrases
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between omitting and substituting
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’

6G Subsection 35(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'or of the Northern Territory', substitute 'or that Territory'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6g
schema version: 2

6H Subsection 35(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Insertion of 'of the Australian Capital Territory' after 'Minister of a State'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6h
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6H Subsection 35(4)

6J Subsection 35(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute 'that Territory' for 'the Northern Territory'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6j
schema version: 2

6K After paragraph 36(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Permission for appointment of member to represent Australian Capital Territory
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6k
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6k-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6K After paragraph 36(1)(b)

6L Subsection 36(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Insertion of territory name
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6l
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of territory name
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6L Subsection 36(2)

6M After subsection 38(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Member can resign by writing to Minister
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6m-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6m
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Can resign
modality: Deontic
operator: can

6N Paragraphs 43(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
note: Amendment of other Acts
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6n-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6n
schema version: 2

6NA Subsection 46(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
note: Omit “(2)” from subsection.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6na-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6na-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6na
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6na-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of “(2)”
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6P Paragraph 46(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
note: Omit 'or the Northern Territory', substitute ', the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6p-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6p
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'or the Northern Territory'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

7 Subsection 22(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
note: Repeal subsection and substitute with new provision requiring testimony to be signed or certified by a judge, magistrate, or officer in the foreign country.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires testimony to be signed or certified within a specific temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits signing or certifying testimony without proper authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

8 Section 4 (definition of possession)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
note: Repeal definition of possession
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

81A Interpretation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
note: Interpretation of Schedule 2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-81a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-81a
schema version: 2

9 At the end of section 29
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(3) At the end of section 29
has part: 9(4) At the end of section 29
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

9(3) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
note: Permit examination or cross-examination of a person giving evidence or producing a document or other article at the proceeding.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9 At the end of section 29

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to examination or cross-examination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

9(4) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
note: Definition of video link
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 9 At the end of section 29

1 Schedule
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
note: Substitute Part IAA for Part 1AA
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 After Part IC
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
note: Saving provision after Part IC
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

10 Paragraph 23WA(8)(f)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Omit 'Part 1B', substitute 'Part IB'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Paragraph 46(1)(ab)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Substitute Part IB for Part 1B
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Section 47
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Substitute Part IB for Part 1B.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Section 47

13 Paragraphs 47A(1)(d), 47B(1)(a) and 47C(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Omit “Part 1B”, substitute ‘Part IB’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Paragraph 233C(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Technical corrections relating to Part numbering in the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Subsection 5(2A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Subsection 3P(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 Subsection 3ZQC(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of Aboriginal legal aid
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Section 23WCA (table items 4, 5 and 6)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Paragraph 23C(7)(fa)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
note: Omit “Part 1AA”, substitute ‘Part IAA’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 After Part IA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.26
note: Corrects a misdescribed amendment of the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 23WD(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 23WD(3) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Subsection 23WD(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

23 Subsection 23WD(4) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.28
note: Omit ‘Part 1B’, substitute ‘Part IB’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Subsection 23WM(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
note: Technical corrections relating to Part numbering in the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

25 Subsection 23WM(3) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit Part 1C, substitute Part IC.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 23WM(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Update to 'Part IC'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to update text
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Omission of 'Part 1C'

27 Subsection 23WM(4) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Paragraph 23XGD(2)(g)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

29 Section 23YS
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Part 1AA (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The new heading is hereby established.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establish new heading
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: A new heading must be established to replace the repealed heading.

30 Subsection 203H(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
schema version: 2

31 Subsection 411(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Subsection 425(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Subsection 107DD(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
note: Substitute Part IC for Part 1C
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

34 Subsection 11C(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.31
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Subsection 66AN(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.31
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Schedule
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
note: Omit “Part 1D”, substitute ‘Part ID’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Subsections 3ZH(2), (2A) and (3A) and 3ZJ(6A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
note: Omit 'Part 1D' and substitute 'Part ID'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 Subsection 3ZL(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
note: Omit “Part 1D”, substitute ‘Part ID’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
schema version: 2

39 Paragraphs 23B(6)(b) and 23C(7)(i)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
note: Omit 'Part 1D', substitute 'Part ID'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Section 23YR (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
note: Omit 'Part 1AA', substitute 'Part IAA'
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40
schema version: 2

41 Item 1 of Schedule 1 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Saving provision
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.33
note: Amendments do not invalidate certain instruments or actions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain instruments and actions from invalidation.
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (1)

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Saving provision

5 Section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
note: Corrects misdescribed amendment of the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Corrects
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to correct misdescribed amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Note:

6 Item 2 of Schedule 1 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.26
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Schedule
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Omit certain provisions of Part 1B
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 3X(4) (definition of prisoner unlawfully at large)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Omit “Part 1B”, substitute ‘Part IB’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Part 1B (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 July 1995
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-10
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Table of sections and coverage
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 March 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 March 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 January 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 January 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 January 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-7
schema version: 2

1 January 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-8
schema version: 2

1 November
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-9
schema version: 2

10 December
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 2, items 15 and 16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10A Section 10A
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Reference to Schedule 2, items 16A to 16E
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-10a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10a
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 item 17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11A Section 11A
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Fixes a single day for Schedule 2 items 18 to 22 subject to subsection (3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subject to subsection (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for Schedule 2 items
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: A single day

12 Section 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the day of commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent

13 Section 13
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of Schedule 3 item 5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Section 14
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of Schedule 3 item 6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Section 15
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

16 Section 16
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of Schedule 3 item 15 after amendment
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16 July 2000
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

17 July 1990
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17 July 1990
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-2
schema version: 2

17 January 1990
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-3
schema version: 2

17 Section 17
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3, item 16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-4
schema version: 2

18 April 1995
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Section 18
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 item 17 after the commencement of the Crimes Amendment (Age Determination) Act.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-2
schema version: 2

19 Section 19
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 items 18 to 29 after item 1 of Schedule 1 to the Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 1998
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement information
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Schedule 1 items 1 to 7, day of Royal Assent
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

20 Section 20
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of item 28 of Schedule 4 to the Customs, Excise and Bounty Legislation Amendment Act 1995.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-ltl-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Immediately after the commencement of item 28 of Schedule 4 to the Customs, Excise and Bounty Legislation Amendment Act 1995

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordered trace
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Immediately after the commencement of item 28 of Schedule 4 to the Customs, Excise and Bounty Legislation Amendment Act 1995

21 Section 21
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 items 31 and 32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-epistemic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval requires relation to Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement is specified as immediately after the commencement of another act

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement is dependent on another act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a conditional provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Schedule 3 items 31 and 32 are conditional on commencement of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Knowledge or belief required for Schedule 3 items 31 and 32 to take effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Requires knowledge or belief about the commencement of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
modality: Epistemic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement is specified as immediately after the commencement of another act

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval requires ordered or recurring trace to Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement is specified as immediately after the commencement of another act

22 Section 22
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of item 1 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Laws Amendment (Excise Arrangements) Act 2001
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

23 January 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23 Section 23
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of item 16 of Schedule 3 to the Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 1999
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-2
schema version: 2

23 June 2000
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-3
schema version: 2

23 July 1998
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(2) July 1998
has part: 23(3) July 1998
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-4
schema version: 2

23(2) July 1998
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
note: Information may be included in any published version of this Act.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 July 1998

23(3) July 1998
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-4-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23 July 1998

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

24 Section 24
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires AI processing for conditional commencement
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The provision imposes a condition on the commencement of item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Requires validation for conditional commencement
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date

25 Section 25
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

26 Section 26
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
note: Immediate action after Act received Royal Assent
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Immediate action required
modality: Deontic
operator: Immediately

28 November
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28 May 1997
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2
schema version: 2

2A Section 2A
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for Schedule 1 item 7A
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Schedule 1, item 7A

2B Section 2B
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Reference to Schedule 1, items 7B to 7F
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2b
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-10
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-11
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-12
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
note: Amendment of Schedule 1 in the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-13
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-3
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Conditional commencement of section 6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal dependency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section 6 commencement is dependent on another event

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-5
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-6
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-7
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-8
schema version: 2

3 December
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-9
schema version: 2

30 May 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30 November
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-2
schema version: 2

31 March 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
note: Conditional commencement of section 9
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 June 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4 May 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-3
schema version: 2

4 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
note: Commencement information
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section 9 of the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1989

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No clear duty, ban, grant permission, or create a right

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section 9 of the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1989

4A Section 4A
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of section 2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4a
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 item 1 after Witness Protection Act 1994 commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

5A Section 5A
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5a-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A specific point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent

5B Section 5B
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Reference to Schedule 2, items 1B to 1F
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5b
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of the Act upon Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Immediate receipt of Royal Assent after certain legislation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8 July 1996
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information for Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent

9 Section 9
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
note: Immediate action after Royal Assent received
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1914 and other legislation relating to criminal law or law enforcement, and for related purposes
identifier: No. 41 of 2003
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU