Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 41 of 2003
description: An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1914 and other legislation relating to criminal law or law enforcement, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Table of sections and coverage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-2-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Schedule 1 items 1 to 7, day of Royal Assent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2-2-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-2-norm

2A Section 2A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2a
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2a-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for Schedule 1 item 7A
premise text: Schedule 1, item 7A
conclusion text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-3-norm

2B Section 2B
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2b
note: Reference to Schedule 1, items 7B to 7F
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2b-norm

1 March 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-3-norm

1 March 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-4-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-4
note: Conditional commencement of section 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Section 6 commencement is dependent on another event
conclusion text: Temporal dependency
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 July 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Conditional commencement of section 9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Section 9 of the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1989
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Section 9 of the Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1989
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No clear duty, ban, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 July 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-2-norm

2 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-2-3-norm

4A Section 4A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4a
note: Conditional commencement of section 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4a-norm

10 December
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-10-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 item 1 after Witness Protection Act 1994 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5-norm

18 April 1995
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-18-norm

5A Section 5A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5a
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5a-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for commencement
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent
conclusion text: A specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-5-norm

5B Section 5B
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5b
note: Reference to Schedule 2, items 1B to 1F
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-5b-norm

1 January 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-5-norm

1 January 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-6-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Conditional commencement of the Act upon Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-6-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-6-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Immediate receipt of Royal Assent after certain legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-7-norm

17 January 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-3-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-7-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Immediate action after Royal Assent received
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-9-norm

28 November
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-28-norm

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
note: Schedule 2, items 15 and 16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-10-2-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-8-norm

10A Section 10A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10a
note: Reference to Schedule 2, items 16A to 16E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-10a-norm

1 January 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-7-norm

1 January 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-8-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 item 17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11-norm

28 May 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-28-2-norm

11A Section 11A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11a
note: Fixes a single day for Schedule 2 items 18 to 22 subject to subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for Schedule 2 items
premise text: A single day
conclusion text: subject to subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 December
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-9-norm

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the day of commencement
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent
conclusion text: Commencement day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-10-norm

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Commencement of Schedule 3 item 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-13-norm

30 May 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-30-norm

14 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Commencement of Schedule 3 item 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-14-norm

8 July 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-2
note: Commencement information for Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-8-2-norm

15 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-11-norm

16 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Commencement of Schedule 3 item 15 after amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 November
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-9-norm

17 Section 17
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-4
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3, item 16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-17-4-norm

30 November
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-30-2-norm

18 Section 18
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-2
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 item 17 after the commencement of the Crimes Amendment (Age Determination) Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-18-2-norm

4 June 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-2-norm

19 Section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 items 18 to 29 after item 1 of Schedule 1 to the Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-19-norm

23 January 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-norm

20 Section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
note: Conditional commencement of item 28 of Schedule 4 to the Customs, Excise and Bounty Legislation Amendment Act 1995.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-ltl-2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: Immediately after the commencement of item 28 of Schedule 4 to the Customs, Excise and Bounty Legislation Amendment Act 1995
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-20-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace.
premise text: Immediately after the commencement of item 28 of Schedule 4 to the Customs, Excise and Bounty Legislation Amendment Act 1995
conclusion text: Ordered trace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July 1995
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-1-10-norm

21 Section 21
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 items 31 and 32
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-epistemic-4

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Commencement is specified as immediately after the commencement of another act
conclusion text: Temporal interval requires relation to Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for commencement
premise text: Commencement is specified as immediately after the commencement of another act
conclusion text: Temporal interval requires ordered or recurring trace to Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 commencement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a conditional provision
premise text: Schedule 3 items 31 and 32 are conditional on commencement of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
conclusion text: Commencement is dependent on another act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-21-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires knowledge or belief about the commencement of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
premise text: Commencement is specified as immediately after the commencement of another act
conclusion text: Knowledge or belief required for Schedule 3 items 31 and 32 to take effect
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 July 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-16-2-norm

22 Section 22
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: Conditional commencement of item 1 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Laws Amendment (Excise Arrangements) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-22-norm

4 May 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-3-norm

23 Section 23
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
note: Conditional commencement of item 16 of Schedule 3 to the Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-2-norm

31 March 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-31-norm

24 Section 24
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Conditional commencement of item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an undertaking
premise text: The provision imposes a condition on the commencement of item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires AI processing for conditional commencement
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-24-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires validation for conditional commencement
premise text: Item 221 of Schedule 1 to the Quarantine Amendment Act 1999 has a specific commencement date
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23 June 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-3-norm

25 Section 25
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-12-norm

4 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-4
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-4-4-norm

26 Section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Immediate action after Act received Royal Assent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Immediately
logic summary: Immediate action required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 July 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4
has part: 23(2) July 1998
has part: 23(3) July 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8

23(2) July 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4-ss-2
part of: 23 July 1998
note: Information may be included in any published version of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-2-norm

23(3) July 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4-ss-3
part of: 23 July 1998
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-23-4-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-13
note: Amendment of Schedule 1 in the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sec-3-13-norm

1 Subsection 3ZL(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Omit 'fingerprints or', substitute 'fingerprints and/or'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-1-norm

2 After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
has part: 2(3A) After subsection 3ZL(3)
has part: 2(3B) After subsection 3ZL(3)
has part: 2(3C) After subsection 3ZL(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9

2(3A) After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a
part of: 2 After subsection 3ZL(3)
note: Order to attend a specified police station at a specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(3A) After subsection 3ZL(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal obligation to attend a police station.
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...
conclusion text: The person must attend the specified police station at the specified time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the order and the action.
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...
conclusion text: The person must attend the police station at a specified time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of the order on the person's actions.
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...
conclusion text: The person must attend the police station at a specified time if ordered to do so.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated effect of the order on the person's actions.
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...
conclusion text: The order propagates to require the person to attend the police station at a specified time.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of the order as a legal obligation.
premise text: (3A) The judge or magistrate may also make any other orders that are reasonably necessary...
conclusion text: The order is represented as a legal obligation in the knowledge base.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3B) After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b
part of: 2 After subsection 3ZL(3)
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an order is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(3B) After subsection 3ZL(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (3B) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person’s conduct contravenes the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3C) After subsection 3ZL(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c
part of: 2 After subsection 3ZL(3)
note: Defines conduct as an act or omission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(3C) After subsection 3ZL(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to the definition of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-6-norm

3 Paragraph 3ZM(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Refusal to participate in a parade cannot be used as evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits using refusal to participate in a parade as evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 4J(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Substitute amount in subsection 4J(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4-norm

5 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Amendment of subsection 4J(4) applies to indictable offences committed after the start of the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-5-norm

6 After section 4J
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm

4JA Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4ja
has part: 4JA(1) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
has part: 4JA(2) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11

4JA(1) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1
part of: 4JA Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
note: Court may hear and determine indictable offence under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits hearing and determination of indictable offence.
premise text: (1) A court of summary jurisdiction may hear and determine an indictable offence if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Excerpt specifies temporal interval for pecuniary penalty.
premise text: (b) the pecuniary penalty for the offence is not more than 600 penalty units for an individual or 3,000 penalty units for a body corporate;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Excerpt specifies recurring trace of pecuniary penalty.
premise text: (b) the pecuniary penalty for the offence is not more than 600 penalty units for an individual or 3,000 penalty units for a body corporate;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has obligation to hear and determine indictable offence under certain conditions.
premise text: (c) the defendant and prosecution consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4JA(2) Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2
part of: 4JA Some indictable offences punishable by fine only may be dealt
note: Maximum pecuniary penalty for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits pecuniary penalties exceeding specified amounts
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Bound
logic summary: Establishes temporal bounds for pecuniary penalties
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for pecuniary penalties
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entities (offences and penalties) in the provision
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-4ja-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for pecuniary penalties
premise text: (2) If the defendant is convicted, the court may impose a pecuniary penalty of:
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
has part: 8(3) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
has part: 8(4) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12

8(3) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
note: Subject to contrary intention indicated by the law creating the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm

8(4) Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-4
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
note: Exempts certain indictable offences from the Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain indictable offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Section applies to proceedings for an offence instituted after the Act received Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to proceedings for an offence instituted after the Act received Royal Assent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7A Section 23YDAF (table item 7, column 8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7a
note: Substitute 'yes' for 'no'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
conclusion text: Substitute 'yes' for 'no'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7B Section 23YUA (definition of corresponding law)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7b
note: Repeal definition, substitute corresponding law means a law that relates to forensic procedures and DNA databases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Definition substitution
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7C Section 23YUA (definition of DNA database)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7c
note: Repeal the definition of DNA database
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7c-norm

7D Subsection 23YUD(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7d
note: Transmit information between jurisdictions for investigation purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7d-norm

10 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Does not preclude CrimTrac from entering into a memorandum of understanding or other arrangement with participating jurisdictions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-10-norm

7E At the end of section 23YUD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7e
note: Definition of CrimTrac Agency and investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for CrimTrac Agency
premise text: CrimTrac means the CrimTrac Agency, established as an Executive Agency by the Governor-General by order under section 65 of the Public Service Act 1999.
conclusion text: CrimTrac is the CrimTrac Agency
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7e-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Investigation definition
premise text: investigation of a matter means: ...
conclusion text: investigation of a matter is defined as specified in this section
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7F Transitional provision for existing arrangements under
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7f
note: Continues existing arrangements under subsection 23YUD(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 as amended by this Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-7f-norm

8 Paragraph 16A(2)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
note: Modify text of section 16A(2)(f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm

9 Paragraph 19AS(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Substitute 'federal,' for 'federal' in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-1-sec-12-norm

1AA Section 2 (table item 5, column 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1aa
note: Substitute Communications Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2003 for 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1AA Section 2 (table item 5, column 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace Act with new version
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 8(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Substitution of text in subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1-norm

1A Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of police
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1a
note: Member of a foreign police force is also considered a police officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1A Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of police
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion in definition
premise text: Definition of police officer
conclusion text: Member of a foreign police force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1B Paragraph 18(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1b
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Crime Commission or a member of its staff
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1C Subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1c
note: Repeal a subparagraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1c-norm

1D Paragraph 794C(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1d
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with a new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1D Paragraph 794C(5)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the Chief Executive Officer or ACC staff
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1E Paragraph 823C(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1e
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1e-norm

1F Paragraph 823CA(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1f
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-1f-norm

2 Subsection 6A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Omit 'law in force in the Northern Territory' and substitute 'law of the Northern Territory'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-2-norm

3 Subsection 6A(7) (definition of criminal act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Omit 'law in force in the Northern Territory', substitute 'law of the Northern Territory'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'law in force in the Northern Territory'
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'law in force' with 'law'
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: If omitting 'law in force' is not allowed, then substitute 'law of the Northern Territory'
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Replaces 'law in force' with 'law'
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Uses context to infer substitution of 'law of the Northern Territory'
premise text: Omit ‘law in force in the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘law of the Northern Territory’
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Amendments apply after Royal Assent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4A Subsection 33(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4a
note: Insertion of condition after 'must'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4a-norm

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A Subsection 33(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

4B After subsection 33(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4b
note: Insert Schedule 2 Amendment of other Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-4b-norm

14 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Must deliver person to foreign police custody and hold in custody until delivered.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deliver and hold in custody
premise text: (2A)
conclusion text: a must cause the person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Paragraph 10(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Corrects misdescribed amendment of section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Paragraph 17(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Corrects misdescribed amendment of section 21B of the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6-norm

6A Section 4 (after paragraph (a) of the definition of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6a-norm

6B Paragraph 6(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6b
note: Omit 'and the Northern Territory,' and substitute 'the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6b-norm

6C Paragraph 6(hb)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6D Subsection 35(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6d
note: Omit “8”, substitute “9”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits amendment of other Acts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6E After paragraph 35(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6e
note: Must represent the Australian Capital Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6E After paragraph 35(1)(b)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to represent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6F Subsection 35(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6f
note: Omit or substitute a specific phrase in subsection 35(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting or substituting a phrase
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between omitting and substituting
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between omitting and substituting
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to related phrases
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6f-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Applies reasoning to the phrase substitution
premise text: Omit ‘or the member who is to represent the Northern Territory’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘or a member who is to represent the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory’
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6G Subsection 35(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6g
note: Omit 'or of the Northern Territory', substitute 'or that Territory'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6g-norm

6H Subsection 35(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6h
note: Insertion of 'of the Australian Capital Territory' after 'Minister of a State'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6H Subsection 35(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6J Subsection 35(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6j
note: Substitute 'that Territory' for 'the Northern Territory'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6j-norm

6K After paragraph 36(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6k
note: Permission for appointment of member to represent Australian Capital Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6k-norm

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6k-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 6K After paragraph 36(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6L Subsection 36(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6l
note: Insertion of territory name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6L Subsection 36(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT
logic summary: Insertion of territory name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6M After subsection 38(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6m
note: Member can resign by writing to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6m-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Can resign
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6N Paragraphs 43(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6n
note: Amendment of other Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6n-norm

16 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Omit ‘and of the Northern Territory’ from section headings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘and of the Northern Territory’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6NA Subsection 46(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6na
note: Omit “(2)” from subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6na-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6na-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6na-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of “(2)”
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6P Paragraph 46(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6p
note: Omit 'or the Northern Territory', substitute ', the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6p-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'or the Northern Territory'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 22(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Repeal subsection and substitute with new provision requiring testimony to be signed or certified by a judge, magistrate, or officer in the foreign country.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits signing or certifying testimony without proper authorization.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Requires testimony to be signed or certified within a specific temporal interval.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 4 (definition of possession)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Repeal definition of possession
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 At the end of section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
has part: 9(3) At the end of section 29
has part: 9(4) At the end of section 29
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20

9(3) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 At the end of section 29
note: Permit examination or cross-examination of a person giving evidence or producing a document or other article at the proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to examination or cross-examination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(4) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-4
part of: 9 At the end of section 29
note: Definition of video link
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-9-ss-4-norm

12 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Insertion of section 47C after section 47A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-12-norm

13 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Amendment applies in relation to escape of a person after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-13-norm

14 Item 7 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-2
note: Insert '(wherever occurring)' after 'court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-2-norm

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-14-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Item 7 of Schedule 1
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 22(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces text within specific time frame
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces text within specific time frame
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Text replacement
logic summary: Replaces text with new version
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-15-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Text replacement
logic summary: Replaces text with new version
premise text: Omit ‘to the Department or a Deputy Secretary’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘of the Department or an APS employee’
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsections 22(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-2
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16A After section 267
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16a
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16a-norm

267A Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267a
note: Duties under Division 3 apply to the Official Trustee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267A Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-267a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Duties under Division 3 apply to the Official Trustee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: No summary available
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-18-norm

16B At the end of subsection 278(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16b
note: Disposal of property necessary to pay debts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to dispose of property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16C At the end of section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16c
has part: 16C(3) At the end of section 279
has part: 16C(4) At the end of section 279
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22

16C(3) At the end of section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3
part of: 16C At the end of section 279
note: Object to disposal of controlled property under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16C(3) At the end of section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16C(4) At the end of section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4
part of: 16C At the end of section 279
note: Specify item or items of controlled property to be disposed of and portion not objected to.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16C(4) At the end of section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specify
logic summary: Specify item or items of controlled property to be disposed of and portion not objected to.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16D After subsection 280(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16d
note: Court must make order to dispose of controlled property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16D After subsection 280(4)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16E Section 338 (at the end of the definition of controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16e
note: Alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Division 3 of Part 4-1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-16e-norm

17 Item 4 of Schedule 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Corrects a misdescribed amendment of the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of authority)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-2
note: Note: Section 81A alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Part 5.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-18-2-norm

19 Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Part 5.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-19-norm

20 Subsection 3(1) (definition of warrant)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Insertion of exception in definition of warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 3(1) (at the end of the definition of warrant)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Alters the meaning of this term for the purposes of Part 5.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-21-norm

22 After section 81
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-22-norm

81A Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81a
note: Interpretation of Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-81a-norm

20 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-2
note: Authority includes bodies or persons that may issue warrants for arrest and return to custody.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Authority includes bodies or persons that may issue warrants.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy
logic summary: Authority is defined by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Substitute Part IAA for Part 1AA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-1-norm

2 Paragraph 23C(7)(fa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Omit “Part 1AA”, substitute ‘Part IAA’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-2-norm

3 Part 1AA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Establish new heading
premise text: A new heading must be established to replace the repealed heading.
conclusion text: The new heading is hereby established.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 23YR (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Omit 'Part 1AA', substitute 'Part IAA'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-4-norm

5 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Corrects misdescribed amendment of the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Obligation to correct misdescribed amendment
premise text: Note:
conclusion text: Corrects
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-22-norm

6 Item 2 of Schedule 1 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-6-norm

2 After Part IA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2-2
note: Corrects a misdescribed amendment of the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-2-2-norm

7 Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Omit certain provisions of Part 1B
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 3X(4) (definition of prisoner unlawfully at large)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Omit “Part 1B”, substitute ‘Part IB’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-8-norm

9 Part 1B (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-9-norm

10 Paragraph 23WA(8)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Omit 'Part 1B', substitute 'Part IB'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-10-norm

11 Paragraph 46(1)(ab)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Substitute Part IB for Part 1B
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-11-norm

12 Section 47
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Substitute Part IB for Part 1B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-12-norm

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Section 47
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

13 Paragraphs 47A(1)(d), 47B(1)(a) and 47C(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Omit “Part 1B”, substitute ‘Part IB’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-13-norm

14 Paragraph 233C(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Technical corrections relating to Part numbering in the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-14-norm

24 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
note: Omit ‘Part 1B’, substitute ‘Part IB’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-24-norm

15 Subsection 5(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-15-norm

16 Subsection 3P(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-16-norm

17 Subsection 3ZQC(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of Aboriginal legal aid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-18-norm

19 Section 23WCA (table items 4, 5 and 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-19-norm

20 Subsection 23WD(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 23WD(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-21-norm

22 Subsection 23WD(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-22-2-norm

23 Subsection 23WD(4) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-23-norm

24 Subsection 23WM(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-2
note: Technical corrections relating to Part numbering in the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-24-2-norm

26 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
note: Omit Part 1C, substitute Part IC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-norm

25 Subsection 23WM(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-25-norm

26 Subsection 23WM(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-2
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Obligation to update text
premise text: Omission of 'Part 1C'
conclusion text: Update to 'Part IC'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 23WM(4) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-27-norm

28 Paragraph 23XGD(2)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-28-norm

29 Section 23YS
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
note: Omit 'Part 1C' and substitute 'Part IC'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 203H(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-30-norm

31 Subsection 411(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-31-norm

32 Subsection 425(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-32-norm

33 Subsection 107DD(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
note: Substitute Part IC for Part 1C
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 11C(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-34-norm

35 Subsection 66AN(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
note: Omit 'Part 1C', substitute 'Part IC'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-35-norm

28 Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-28-2-norm

36 Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
note: Omit “Part 1D”, substitute ‘Part ID’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-36-norm

37 Subsections 3ZH(2), (2A) and (3A) and 3ZJ(6A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
note: Omit 'Part 1D' and substitute 'Part ID'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-37-norm

38 Subsection 3ZL(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
note: Omit “Part 1D”, substitute ‘Part ID’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-38-norm

39 Paragraphs 23B(6)(b) and 23C(7)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
note: Omit 'Part 1D', substitute 'Part ID'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-39-norm

40 Part 1D (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-40-norm

41 Item 1 of Schedule 1 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-41
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-41-norm

1 After Part IC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-2
note: Saving provision after Part IC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-1-2-norm

42 Saving provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
note: Amendments do not invalidate certain instruments or actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Saving provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-enhancement-act-2003-sch-3-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts certain instruments and actions from invalidation.
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed