1 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.8
note: Definition of stored communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the concept of stored communication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as a legal definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 5(1)

10 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1A) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 10(2) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 10(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 10(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Paragraph (d) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.49
note: Replace outdated telecommunications interception legislation with updated Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to update the Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

10(1A) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.14
note: A person must provide written notice of an intention to perform an act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knows of the intention
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNEW

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(1A) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

10(2) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.14
note: Exemptions from interception warrants for certain employees and officials.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to exempt certain employees and officials from interception warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(2) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

10(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.14
note: Access to a stored communication is under an interception warrant if the warrant would have authorised interception of the communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to a stored communication is under an interception warrant during the time the communication was being transmitted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between intercepted and stored communications
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The warrant would have authorised interception of the communication if it were still passing over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to a stored communication is under an interception warrant if the warrant would have authorised interception of the communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional access to a stored communication based on warrant authorisation
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: The warrant would have authorised interception of the communication if it were still passing over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to a stored communication is under an interception warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: The warrant would have authorised interception of the communication.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to a stored communication is under an interception warrant if the warrant would have authorised interception of the communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional diffusion of access to a stored communication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The warrant would have authorised interception of the communication if it were still passing over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to a stored communication is under an interception warrant during the time the communication was being transmitted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between intercepted and stored communications
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The warrant would have authorised interception of the communication if it were still passing over a telecommunications system.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

10(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.14
note: Court must consider regulations when determining reasonableness of actions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: mustConsider

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

100 Section 63AA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Replace section headings with new ones.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-100-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-100
schema version: 2

101 Section 63AA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Omit 'designated warrant information' and substitute 'interception warrant information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-101-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-101
schema version: 2

102 Subsections 63B(3) and (4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Omit 'designated warrant information', substitute 'interception warrant information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-102-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-102
schema version: 2

103 Paragraph 64(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-103-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-103
schema version: 2

104 Paragraph 64(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-104-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-104-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104 Paragraph 64(1)(b)

105 Paragraphs 65(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-105-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraphs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-105-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105 Paragraphs 65(1)(a) and (b)

106 Paragraph 65A(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-106-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-106
schema version: 2

107 Paragraph 65A(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with new provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-107-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-107
schema version: 2

108 Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.13
note: Accessing or authorizing access to stored communications is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-108-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-108
schema version: 2

108 Paragraph 67(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-108-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-108-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing or authorizing access to stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-108-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 108 Stored communications not to be accessed

109 Access to stored communications under Part 2-2 warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.16
note: Authorizing interception of communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-109
schema version: 2

109 Paragraph 67(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with new provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-109-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 109 Paragraph 67(1)(b)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: authorizes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-109-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 109 Access to stored communications under Part 2-2 warrants

11 Subsection 19A(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.49
note: Omit section 63 of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 and substitute sections 63 and 133 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to omit section 63 and substitute sections 63 and 133.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

110 Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110(1) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
has part: 110(2) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
has part: 110(3) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
has part: 110(4) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110
schema version: 2

110 Paragraph 67(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110-2
schema version: 2

110(1) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.16
note: Enforcement agency may apply for stored communications warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(1) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications

110(2) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.16
note: Application must be made on behalf of the agency by a person or officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made on behalf of the agency
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

110(3) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.16
note: Agency officer may nominate an office for management purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications

110(4) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.16
note: Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-110-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(4) Enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications

111 Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 111(1) Form of applications
has part: 111(2) Form of applications
has part: 111(3) Form of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-111
schema version: 2

111 Paragraph 67(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.63
note: Stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-111-2
schema version: 2

111(1) Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Application must be in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-111-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Form of applications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(1) Form of applications

111(2) Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Telephone application permitted under urgent circumstances
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-111-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Form of applications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telephone application permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits telephone application
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Chief officer authorisation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(2) Form of applications

111(3) Form of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Authorises persons to make applications on behalf of the agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-111-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 111 Form of applications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Persons are entitled to make applications.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation is granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: Chief officer may authorise persons.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-111-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111(3) Form of applications

112 Contents of written applications
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Application must provide agency name and applicant's name.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-112-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-112
schema version: 2

112 Section 68
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-112-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-112-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide agency name and applicant's name.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-112-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112 Contents of written applications

113 Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications
has part: 113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications
has part: 113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113
schema version: 2

113 Section 68
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'designated warrant information', substitute 'interception warrant information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-2
schema version: 2

113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
description: Affidavit
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Application must be accompanied by an affidavit.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications

113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Affidavits must set out facts and grounds for application
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavits must be provided
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications

113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
description: 2 or more affidavits
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Affidavits may be submitted in addition to the required affidavit.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavits are required for written applications
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications

114 Information to be given on telephone applications
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.17
note: Must provide information on telephone applications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-114-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-114
schema version: 2

114 Subsection 74(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-114-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-114-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-114-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114 Information to be given on telephone applications

115 Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 115(1) Giving further information to Judge
has part: 115(2) Giving further information to Judge
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-115
schema version: 2

115 Subsections 74(3), 76(2) and 76A(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'designated warrant information', substitute 'interception warrant information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-115-2
schema version: 2

115(1) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
note: Issuing authority may require further information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-115-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Giving further information to Judge

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 115(1) Giving further information to Judge

115(2) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
note: Must provide further information on oath or orally as directed.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-115-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Giving further information to Judge

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide further information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-115-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 115(2) Giving further information to Judge

116 Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants
has part: 116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants
has part: 116(3) Issuing of stored communications warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116
schema version: 2

116 Subsection 77(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'Designated warrant information' and substitute 'Interception warrant information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116-2
schema version: 2

116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
note: Issuing authority must issue a stored communications warrant if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing authority has an obligation to issue a stored communications warrant if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants

116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
note: Authority must consider privacy impact and investigation methods when issuing stored communications warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority's consideration overlaps with existing investigation methods.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The authority's consideration overlaps with investigation methods used by or available to the agency.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) The matters to which the issuing authority must have regard...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must consider the specified factors.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has an obligation to consider privacy impact and investigation methods.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The matters to which the issuing authority must have regard...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must consider the potential prejudice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has an obligation to consider the prejudice of using stored communications warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The matters to which the issuing authority must have regard...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must consider the potential impact.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has an obligation to consider the impact on investigation by using stored communications warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The matters to which the issuing authority must have regard...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants

116(3) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
note: Warrant may be issued in relation to investigation of more than one serious contravention.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuance of warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: ISSUANCE
premise text: (3) The warrant may be issued...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-116-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(3) Issuing of stored communications warrants

117 What stored communications warrants authorise
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.19
note: Authorises access to stored communication under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-117-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117
schema version: 2

117 Subsections 77(3) and (4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Substitute 'interception warrant information' for 'designated warrant information'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-117-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-117-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117 What stored communications warrants authorise

118 Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants
has part: 118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants
has part: 118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118
schema version: 2

118 Part VIII (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2
schema version: 2

118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: Stored communications warrant must be signed by issuing authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a signed warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants

118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: Conditions or restrictions for accessing stored communications under the warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifying conditions or restrictions
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants

118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: Issuing authority must set out particulars of serious contraventions in a stored communications warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars of serious contraventions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-118-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants

119 Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(3) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(5) Duration of stored communications warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119
schema version: 2

119 Paragraph 80(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Omit “Part VI”, substitute ‘Part 2-5’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119-2
schema version: 2

119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: A stored communications warrant remains in force until it is first executed or the end of 5 days after its issue, whichever occurs sooner.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duration of stored communications warrants
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The duration overlaps with the end of 5 days after its issue.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (a) until it is first executed; (b) until the end of the period of 5 days after the day on which it was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A stored communications warrant remains in force:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The warrant holds until it is executed or the end of 5 days after its issue.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (a) until it is first executed; (b) until the end of the period of 5 days after the day on which it was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A stored communications warrant remains in force:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The warrant holds until the end of 5 days after its issue.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (b) until the end of the period of 5 days after the day on which it was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duration of stored communications warrants
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The warrant diffuses to all parties with access to the communication.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (a) until it is first executed; (b) until the end of the period of 5 days after the day on which it was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duration of stored communications warrants
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The duration is an upper bound for the warrant's existence.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) until it is first executed; (b) until the end of the period of 5 days after the day on which it was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants

119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: Warrant remains in force for a telecommunications service operated by a particular carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant remains in force until the end of the period of 5 days after the day on which it was issued.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The warrant remains in force during the specified period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) However, if the warrant relates to more than one telecommunications service and those services are not all operated by the same carrier...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant remains in force for a telecommunications service operated by a particular carrier.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The warrant is recognized as a valid warrant for telecommunications services.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2) However, if the warrant relates to more than one telecommunications service and those services are not all operated by the same carrier...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant remains in force for a telecommunications service operated by a particular carrier.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The warrant holds for the specified telecommunications service.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (2) However, if the warrant relates to more than one telecommunications service and those services are not all operated by the same carrier...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant remains in force for a telecommunications service operated by a particular carrier.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The warrant diffuses to other telecommunications services operated by the same carrier.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) However, if the warrant relates to more than one telecommunications service and those services are not all operated by the same carrier...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant remains in force until it is first executed in relation to a telecommunications service operated by that particular carrier.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The warrant remains in force until the specified event occurs.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) However, if the warrant relates to more than one telecommunications service and those services are not all operated by the same carrier...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants

119(3) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: Cannot vary stored communications warrant duration
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines duration of warrant as part of stored communications warrant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines duration of warrant as part of stored communications warrant
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of varying warrant duration
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines duration of warrant as part of stored communications warrant
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines duration of warrant as part of stored communications warrant
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.

119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: Issue of further warrant not prevented
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between warrants
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) This section does not prevent the issue of a further warrant in respect of the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference from warrants
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (4) This section does not prevent the issue of a further warrant in respect of the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue further warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) This section does not prevent the issue of a further warrant in respect of the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of warrants
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (4) This section does not prevent the issue of a further warrant in respect of the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between warrants
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (4) This section does not prevent the issue of a further warrant in respect of the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants

119(5) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: No new warrant can be issued within 3 days of the previous warrant's execution.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with previous warrant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) However, if the further warrant relates to the same telecommunications service as the previous warrant

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Limits issuance of new warrants within a time frame
modality: CogAI
operator: Restricts
premise text: (5) However, if the further warrant relates to the same telecommunications service as the previous warrant

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No new warrant can be issued within 3 days of the previous warrant's execution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Limits issuance of new warrants within a time frame
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restricts
premise text: (5) However, if the further warrant relates to the same telecommunications service as the previous warrant

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-119-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal restriction on issuing new warrants
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (5) However, if the further warrant relates to the same telecommunications service as the previous warrant

12 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.49
note: Omit specified section and substitute with new sections.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Schedule 1

120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
has part: 120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120
schema version: 2

120 Paragraph 80(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Substitute warrant part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2
schema version: 2

120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
description: warrant terms, signing day, and time
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.21
note: Issuing authority must inform and provide warrant to applicant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform and provide warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
description: affidavit or affidavits, copy of authorisation
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.21
note: Affidavits must be provided by the applicant within one day after a warrant is issued.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide affidavit and authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-120-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone

121 What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
note: Inform Managing Director of carrier about issued warrant and provide certified copy.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-121-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-121
schema version: 2

121 Paragraph 81(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Substitute warrant part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-121-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-121-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must inform carrier about warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-121-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121 What happens when stored communications warrants are

122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 122(1) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
has part: 122(2) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
has part: 122(3) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
has part: 122(4) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122
schema version: 2

122 Paragraph 81(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Omit “Part VI”, substitute ‘Part 2-5’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2
schema version: 2

122(1) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
note: Chief officer must inform and revoke stored communications warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inform and revoke warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform and revoke warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Chief officer has issued the warrant.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(1) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers

122(2) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
note: Chief officer may revoke warrant issued to agency after informing other agencies.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must inform other agencies within the defined temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for informing other agencies before revoking a warrant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may at any time, by writing signed by him or her...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer may not revoke the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits chief officer from revoking warrant without informing other agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may at any time, by writing signed by him or her...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must inform other agencies before revoking a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the chief officer to inform other agencies before revoking a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may at any time, by writing signed by him or her...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer is permitted to revoke a warrant after informing other agencies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to the chief officer to revoke a warrant after informing other agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may at any time, by writing signed by him or her...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(2) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers

122(3) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
note: Delegation of power to a certifying officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers

122(4) Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
note: Section does not apply in relation to a warrant that has ceased to be in force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-122-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers

123 What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are
has part: 123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-123
schema version: 2

123 Paragraph 81(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Substitute warrant part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-123-2
schema version: 2

123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.23
note: Chief officer of another enforcement agency must be informed of revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-123-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 123 What happens when stored communications warrants are

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer has an obligation to inform.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are

123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.23
note: Chief officer must inform Managing Director of revocation and provide certified copy.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-123-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 123 What happens when stored communications warrants are

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer has an obligation to inform Managing Director of revocation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-123-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are

124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.23
note: Access to stored communications warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-124-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124
schema version: 2

124 Paragraphs 81(1)(f), (g) and (h)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-124-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-124-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored

125 Entry into force of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.24
note: Entry into force of stored communications warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-125-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125
schema version: 2

125 Paragraphs 81(2)(a), (b) and (ba)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Substitute warrant part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-125-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125-2
schema version: 2

126 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.24
note: Notification required for access to stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-126-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126
schema version: 2

126 Paragraphs 81(2)(d), (e) and (f)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-126-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to stored communications
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires notification
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Section 121

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126 Limit on authority conferred by warrant

127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-127
schema version: 2

127 Subsection 81(2A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Omit “Part VI warrant”, substitute ‘Part 2-5 warrant’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-127-2
schema version: 2

127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.24
note: Exercise of authority is restricted to authorized personnel.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-127-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts exercise of authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.24
note: Agency may approve exercise of authority by officers/staff members of agency or other agencies.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-127-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency permits exercise of authority by officers/staff members.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.24
note: Appointment of an approving officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-127-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-127-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the deontic type of the excerpt
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDeonticType

128 Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 128(1) Provision of technical assistance
has part: 128(2) Provision of technical assistance
has part: 128(3) Provision of technical assistance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128
schema version: 2

128 Subsection 81A(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Omit “Part VI warrant”, substitute ‘Part 2-5 warrant’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2
schema version: 2

128(1) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.25
note: Designated officer or carrier employee may provide technical assistance to enforcement agency officer/staff member exercising stored communications warrant authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

128(2) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.25
note: Prohibition of accessing stored communications without a warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the doing of any act in connection with...the installation of equipment for the purposes of accessing stored communications in accordance with a stored communications warrant;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires provision of technical assistance during the installation of equipment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the provision of technical assistance includes...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the doing of any act in connection with...the installation of equipment for the purposes of accessing stored communications in accordance with a stored communications warrant;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the act of accessing stored communications without a warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the provision of technical assistance includes...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the doing of any act in connection with...the removal of such equipment;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the removal of equipment without a warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the provision of technical assistance includes...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the doing of any act in connection with...the installation of equipment for the purposes of accessing stored communications in accordance with a stored communications warrant;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes provision of technical assistance related to accessing stored communications
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the provision of technical assistance includes...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the doing of any act in connection with...the removal of such equipment;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes provision of technical assistance related to removing equipment
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the provision of technical assistance includes...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the doing of any act in connection with...the maintenance, testing or use of such equipment;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires provision of technical assistance during the maintenance or testing of equipment
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the provision of technical assistance includes...

128(3) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.25
note: Declare persons designated officers for the purposes of this section.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare persons designated officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-128-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(3) Provision of technical assistance

129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 129(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
has part: 129(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
has part: 129(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-129
schema version: 2

129 Paragraphs 81C(3)(a) and (4)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Omit “Part VI warrant”, substitute ‘Part 2-5 warrant’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-129-2
schema version: 2

129(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
note: Carrier or subsidiary may issue written certificate
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-129-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a written certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 129(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

129(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-129-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 129(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

129(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
note: Determination of corporate subsidiary relationship
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-129-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-129-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 129(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers

13 Paragraph 17(1)(e)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.49
note: Replace outdated act with new one
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to replace the outdated act
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement
has part: 130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130
schema version: 2

130 Subsection 84(1A) (note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Substitute 'interception warrant information' for 'designated warrant information'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2
schema version: 2

130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
note: Certifying officer must issue written certificate with relevant facts.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A written certificate must be issued
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a written certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Certifying officer has the authority to issue certificates

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement

130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-130-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by enforcement

131 Certified copies of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.27
note: Exempt proceeding must receive certified copy of stored communications warrant as if it were the original.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-131-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-131
schema version: 2

131 Paragraph 92(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.65
note: Stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-131-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-131-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on exempt proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 131 Certified copies of stored communications warrants

132 Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 132(1) Obstruction
has part: 132(2) Obstruction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132
schema version: 2

132 Part IX (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2
schema version: 2

132(1) Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.27
note: Obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Obstruction

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on individuals to not obstruct another person acting under a stored communications warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(1) Obstruction

132(2) Obstruction
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.27
note: A reasonable excuse is a valid reason for obstruction or hindering.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Obstruction

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The defendant's excuse is inferred to be reasonable.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a reasonable excuse.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: The defendant must believe they have a reasonable excuse.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The interval of the reasonable excuse is not specified.
modality: LTL
operator: Interval

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-132-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(2) Obstruction

133 No dealing with accessed information or stored communications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.27
note: No dealing with accessed information or stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-133-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-133
schema version: 2

133 Paragraphs 94A(1)(a) and (b) and (3)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Omit 'Part VI' and substitute 'Part 2-5' in section headings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-133-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-133-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of communication and use of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-133-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 133 No dealing with accessed information or stored communications

134 Dealing in stored communications warrant information for the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.28
note: Permits communication, use, recording, and evidence of stored communications warrant information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-134-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-134-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134
schema version: 2

134 Subsections 100(1) and (2) and 101(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Omit 'Part VI warrants' and substitute 'Part 2-5 warrants'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-134-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-134-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-134-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134 Dealing in stored communications warrant information for the

135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 135(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 135(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 135(4) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135
schema version: 2

135 Subparagraph 102(1)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135-2
schema version: 2

135(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.28
note: Employee must communicate information to authorized officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers

135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.28
note: Authorisation of officers to receive information under stored communications warrants.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...officers, or classes of officers, of the agency to receive information...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may authorise in writing...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...officers, or classes of officers, of the agency to receive information...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Automation of warrant issuance
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial Intelligence
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may authorise in writing...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...officers, or classes of officers, of the agency to receive information...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may authorise...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...officers, or classes of officers, of the agency to receive information...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Sharing information with agents
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may authorise in writing...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...officers, or classes of officers, of the agency to receive information...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ongoing authority
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an enforcement agency may authorise in writing...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers

135(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.28
note: Employee may use lawfully accessed information in performance of duties.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to use lawfully accessed information in performance of duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: use

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Employee is an instance of a person who may use lawfully accessed information.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: instanceOf

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers

135(4) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.28
note: Employee may communicate lawfully accessed information to another carrier for business purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information can be communicated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employee may communicate information.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-135-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Purpose classified as business.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of communication purposes.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Communication is for business purposes.

136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 136(1) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 136(2) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 136(3) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 136(4) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136
schema version: 2

136 Paragraph 102(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2
schema version: 2

136(1) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
note: Permits communication of lawfully accessed information for purposes of security.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal relationship with security purposes
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: for purposes of security,

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Provides justification for permitted action
modality: Argumentation
operator: justification
premise text: in connection with the performance by the Organisation of its functions, or otherwise

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes information diffusion mechanism
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
premise text: communicate to another person, make use of, or make a record of

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(1) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

136(2) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
note: Communication of foreign intelligence information to Organisation employees
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

136(3) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
note: Allow foreign intelligence information sharing with Director-General of Security or other officers/employees.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to share foreign intelligence information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(3) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

136(4) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
note: Use foreign intelligence information in connection with Organisation's functions
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-136-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use foreign intelligence information
modality: Deontic
operator: May

137 Communicating information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 137(1) Communicating information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(2) Communicating information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(3) Communicating information obtained by Organisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-137
schema version: 2

137 Subparagraph 102(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-137-2
schema version: 2

137(1) Communicating information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.31
note: Directors-General must communicate certain information to others.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-137-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Communicating information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

137(2) Communicating information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.31
note: Authorisation to communicate information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-137-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Communicating information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for communication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The communication may be made by the Director-General of Security personally or by a person authorised by the Director-General.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for communication method
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (2) The communication may be made by the Director-General of Security personally or by a person authorised by the Director-General.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Automated processing of communication
modality: CogAI
operator: Process
premise text: (2) The communication may be made by the Director-General of Security personally or by a person authorised by the Director-General.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The communication may be made by the Director-General of Security personally or by a person authorised by the Director-General.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Communication spread through authorised channels
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (2) The communication may be made by the Director-General of Security personally or by a person authorised by the Director-General.

137(3) Communicating information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.31
note: Approved communication of foreign intelligence information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-137-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 137 Communicating information obtained by Organisation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Limits communication to within approval period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (3) A person to whom foreign intelligence information has been communicated:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to communicate
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) A person to whom foreign intelligence information has been communicated:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorizes communication with approval
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: (b) in accordance with an approval given under this subsection;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that the Attorney-General must approve
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: may communicate that information to such persons, and in such manner, as are approved in writing by the Attorney-General.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-137-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 137(3) Communicating information obtained by Organisation

138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 138(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to
has part: 138(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138
schema version: 2

138 Paragraph 102(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-138-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2
schema version: 2

138(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.31
note: Employee must communicate certain information to the authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-138-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-138-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-138-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

138(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to
type: Concept
description: Lawfully accessed information, stored communications warrant information
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.31
note: Employee may communicate information to enforcement agency for investigation purposes
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-138-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-138-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-138-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(4) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(5) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139
schema version: 2

139 Paragraph 103(ab)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Substitute 'Part 2-5' for 'Part VI'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-2
schema version: 2

139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.32
note: Communication of lawfully accessed information to another person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Communication allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Lawful access to information.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.32
note: Purposes connected with investigation, decision-making, and record-keeping.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During investigation periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Connected to investigation purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: connectedTo
premise text: (2) The purposes are purposes connected with:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Connected to record-keeping purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: connectedTo
premise text: (d) the keeping of records by the agency under Part 3-5.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During decision-making periods
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (c) a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.32
note: Prohibition of serious or punishable offences
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...render the person committing the contravention liable:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits serious or punishable offences
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A contravention to which this subsection applies is a contravention of a law...

139(4) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.32
note: Excluded proceedings
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: !

139(5) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.32
note: Defines penalty units for contravention of a law
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the meaning of penalty units
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes a reference to an amount of a fine or pecuniary penalty
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-139-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(5) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.

14 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.18
note: Application must include certain matters when made by telephone or in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 26(8)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.49
note: Omit and substitute an Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must include certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.33
note: Reporting suspected unlawful access of stored communications to authorities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-140-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140
schema version: 2

140 Subsection 104(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.67
note: Substitute Part numbers in a provision.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-140-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-140-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140 Subsection 104(3)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reporting required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to report
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Reasonable grounds suspected

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-140-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful

141 Making record for purpose of permitted communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.34
note: Allowing record-making for permitted communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-141-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-141
schema version: 2

141 Part X (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.67
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-141-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-141-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to make records
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-141-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141 Making record for purpose of permitted communication

142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.34
note: Recipient may communicate or use information for specified purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-142-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142
schema version: 2

142 Paragraphs 107(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.67
note: Omit 'Part VIII', substitute 'Part 2-7'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-142-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to act
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-142-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information

143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 143(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-143
schema version: 2

143 Part XA (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.67
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-143-2
schema version: 2

143(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.34
note: Giving lawfully accessed information in evidence in exempt proceeding.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-143-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.34
note: Determine on the balance of probabilities whether a stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-143-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accessed in contravention
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine
premise text: Subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

143(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.34
note: Permits giving stored communications warrant information in exempt proceeding.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-143-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-143-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding

144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 144(1) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
has part: 144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144
schema version: 2

144 Part XI (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.67
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new chapter title
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2
schema version: 2

144(1) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.35
note: Allowing access to stored communications in certain circumstances
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully

144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.35
note: Prohibiting reference to irregularity in certain contexts
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids references to irregularities
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids references to irregularities in connection with warrant execution
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity: (b) in connection with the execution of a warrant, or the purported execution of a document purporting to be a warrant.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids references to irregularities in connection with document issuance
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity: (a) in, or in connection with the issue of, a document purporting to be a warrant; or

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-144-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully

145 Evidence that has been given in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.35
note: Permits reuse of exempt proceeding evidence in other proceedings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-145-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-145
schema version: 2

145 Section 108
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.67
note: Renumber as section 300.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-145-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-145-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows reuse of exempt proceeding evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT

146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 146(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
has part: 146(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146
schema version: 2

146(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
note: Giving information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1) in evidence in a proceeding.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in evidence in a proceeding by way of an application under section 165 for remedial relief.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the access and the proceeding.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of information obtained by the access.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for providing information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1).
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (a) the access; or (b) the communication (in contravention of section 133)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in evidence in a proceeding by way of an application under section 165 for remedial relief.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1).
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in evidence in a proceeding by way of an application under section 165 for remedial relief.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1).
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in evidence in a proceeding by way of an application under section 165 for remedial relief.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of the access and communication in relation to the proceeding.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 146(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

146(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
note: Permits giving stored communications warrant information in evidence
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-146-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 146(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial

147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 147(1) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
has part: 147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
has part: 147(3) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-147
schema version: 2

147(1) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
note: Accessed material is inadmissible except as provided
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-147-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing material in evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
note: Accessed material is admissible under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-147-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for accessing stored communication.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Involves a cognitive agent in the provision of accessed material under certain conditions.
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide accessed material under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to provide accessed material under certain conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a trace between accessing stored communication and its admissibility.
modality: LTL
operator: trace relation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

147(3) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
note: Information obtained by access is admissible in evidence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-147-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to provide admissible information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-147-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 147(3) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided

148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 148(1) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
has part: 148(2) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148
schema version: 2

148(1) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
note: Stored communications warrant information is admissible in evidence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-148-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admission of stored communications warrant information.
modality: Deontic
operator: admits

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-148-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(1) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible

148(2) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
note: Permits giving stored communications warrant information in evidence
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-148-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT

149 Evidence that is otherwise inadmissible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.37
note: Exemptions from admissibility of evidence
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-149-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain types of evidence from admissibility
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

15 Subsection 27A(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.49
note: Replace outdated telecommunications interception act with new one.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to replace outdated legislation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Subsection 27A(5)

150 Destruction of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.37
note: Destroy stored communications if not required for a purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-150
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer must cause the information or record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for destruction of records.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) If: (a) information, or a record, that was obtained by accessing a stored communication...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer must cause the information or record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines a knowledge representation for destruction of records.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the information or record...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer must cause the information or record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destruction of records if required for a purpose.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) information, or a record, that was obtained by accessing a stored communication...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer must cause the information or record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines an information flow for destruction of records.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Flow
premise text: (a) information, or a record, that was obtained by accessing a stored communication...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the chief officer must cause the information or record to be destroyed forthwith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal trace for destruction of records.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (1) If: (a) information, or a record, that was obtained by accessing a stored communication...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-150-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150 Destruction of records

151 Enforcement agencies to keep documents connected with issue
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.38
note: Enforcement agency must keep documents connected with issue.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-151-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-151-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151 Enforcement agencies to keep documents connected with issue

152 Functions of Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.38
note: Inspect enforcement agency records to ascertain compliance with sections 150 and 151.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-152-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-152-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152 Functions of Ombudsman

153 Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 153(1) Reports
has part: 153(2) Reports
has part: 153(3) Reports
has part: 153(4) Reports
has part: 153(5) Reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153
schema version: 2

153(1) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister in writing about the results of inspections.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(1) Reports

153(2) Reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: Must provide reports to the Minister within 3 months after the end of the financial year.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reports to the Minister within 3 months after the end of the financial year.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(2) Reports

153(3) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: Ombudsman may report contravention of Act provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(3) Reports

153(4) Reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister in writing about the results of an inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(4) Reports

153(5) Reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: The Ombudsman must provide a report to the chief officer of the enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-153-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(5) Reports

154 Ombudsman’s general powers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 154(1) Ombudsman’s general powers
has part: 154(2) Ombudsman’s general powers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-154
schema version: 2

154(1) Ombudsman’s general powers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: Ombudsman's powers under the Ombudsman Act 1976 extend to an inspection by the Ombudsman.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-154-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 154 Ombudsman’s general powers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman's powers under the Ombudsman Act 1976 extend to an inspection by the Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal extension of powers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Ombudsman's general powers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman's powers under the Ombudsman Act 1976 extend to an inspection by the Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal extension of powers
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Ombudsman's general powers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman's powers under the Ombudsman Act 1976 extend to an inspection by the Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension of powers
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: Ombudsman's general powers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman's powers under the Ombudsman Act 1976 extend to an inspection by the Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal extension of powers
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Ombudsman's general powers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman's powers under the Ombudsman Act 1976 extend to an inspection by the Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal extension of powers
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Ombudsman's general powers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154(1) Ombudsman’s general powers

154(2) Ombudsman’s general powers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: Exercise of powers under Ombudsman Act 1976 is taken as an exercise of powers under the Ombudsman.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-154-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 154 Ombudsman’s general powers

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman's general powers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise of powers is taken as an exercise
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: Ombudsman Act 1976

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-154-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154(2) Ombudsman’s general powers

155 Ombudsman to be given information etc. despite other laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.39
note: An officer of an enforcement agency must provide information despite other laws.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-155-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-155
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-155-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 155 Ombudsman to be given information etc. despite other laws

156 Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156(1) Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
has part: 156(2) Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-156
schema version: 2

156(1) Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
note: Inspecting officer may communicate, use, or record information for inspection purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-156-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-156-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156 Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate, use, or record information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-156-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156(1) Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and

156(2) Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
note: Section 156(2) has effect despite other laws.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-156-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-156-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-156-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156 Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-156-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to have effect despite other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

157 Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 157(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 157(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 157(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 157(8) Application of Ombudsman Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-157
schema version: 2

157(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
note: Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-157-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 157 Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Division.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions during its application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Division.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Division.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Division.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions during its application.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...

157(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
note: Excluding references to actions of an inspecting officer under Division.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-157-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 157 Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 157(2) Application of Ombudsman Act

157(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
note: Subject to section 155 of this Act, subsections 35(2), (3), (4) and
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-157-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 157 Application of Ombudsman Act

157(8) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
note: Application of Ombudsman Act to Division
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-157-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-157-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 157 Application of Ombudsman Act

158 Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 158(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 158(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 158(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158
schema version: 2

158(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.41
note: The Ombudsman must provide information to a State inspecting authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

158(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.41
note: Ombudsman must provide information to authorities under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority must receive information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Ombudsman has discretion

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

158(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.41
note: Ombudsman may receive information from State
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to receive information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-158-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

159 Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.42
note: Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-159-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-159
schema version: 2

16 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.20
note: Stored communication condition for interception warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Subitems 31(1) and (2) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
note: Substitute Act name in Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on State to substitute Act name
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subitems 31(1) and (2) of Schedule 1

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between communication creation and interception
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (b) that another person has made and for which the intended recipient is the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to stored communication
modality: CogAI
operator: isRelatedTo
premise text: (b) that another person has made and for which the intended recipient is the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Stored communication requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: hasCondition
premise text: (b) that another person has made and for which the intended recipient is the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Communication diffusion into interception context
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
premise text: (b) that another person has made and for which the intended recipient is the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between communication creation and interception
modality: LTL
operator: holdsAt
premise text: (b) that another person has made and for which the intended recipient is the person in respect of whom the warrant was issued;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 160(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
has part: 160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-160
schema version: 2

160(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.42
note: Minister may request specified information from chief officer of an enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-160-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-160-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to request specified information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.42
note: Minister must comply with request for information from Commonwealth.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-160-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-160-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-160-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth

161 Annual report by Minister about stored communications
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.43
note: Annual report by Minister about stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-161-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-161
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
has part: 162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162
schema version: 2

162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.43
note: Report statistics on stored communications warrant applications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report statistics
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.43
note: Report on stored communications warrants applications and statistics
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-162-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants

163 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.43
note: Report must provide information about arrests made on lawful accessed information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-163-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-163
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-163-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 163 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants

164 Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 164(1) Annual reports
has part: 164(2) Annual reports
has part: 164(3) Annual reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-164
schema version: 2

164(1) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Minister must cause annual report to be laid before Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-164-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 164 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

164(2) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Annual reports must not be made in a manner that enables the identification of a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-164-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 164 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Annual reports must not be made in a manner that enables the identification of a person.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 164(2) Annual reports

164(3) Annual reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Annual reports must be given to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-164-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 164 Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-164-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 164(3) Annual reports

165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 165(1) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165
schema version: 2

165(1) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Prohibition on unlawful access or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The access must be during the prohibited period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Accessing during contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The access was in contravention of subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accessing is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Subsection 108(1) prohibits accessing a stored communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The access must be forbidden
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids accessing a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: forbids
premise text: Subsection 108(1) prohibits accessing a stored communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The access must be during the prohibited period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Accessing during contravention of subsection 108(1) is prohibited
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The access was in contravention of subsection 108(1)

165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Person is an aggrieved person if they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an aggrieved person
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person is an aggrieved person
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (a) the person was a party to the communication; or (b) the communication was made on the person’s behalf.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an aggrieved person
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person is an aggrieved person if they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, a person is an aggrieved person if, and only if: (a) the person was a party to the communication; or (b) the communication was made on the person’s behalf.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an aggrieved person
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Person is an aggrieved person if they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, a person is an aggrieved person if, and only if: (a) the person was a party to the communication; or (b) the communication was made on the person’s behalf.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Remedial relief for unlawful access or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Remedial relief for unlawful access or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Court may grant remedial relief to an aggrieved person if convicted of unlawful access or communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remedial relief granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Court conviction

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Remedial relief permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: Court discretion

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Prohibition on unlawful access or communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unlawful access or communication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

166 Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 166(1) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 166(2) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 166(3) Limitation periods etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166
schema version: 2

166(1) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.47
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after access took place.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(1) Limitation periods etc.

166(2) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.47
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(2) Limitation periods etc.

166(3) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.47
note: Application for remedial relief must be made as soon as practicable after conviction.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make application as soon as practicable after conviction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-166-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(3) Limitation periods etc.

167 No limitation on other liability
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 167(1) No limitation on other liability
has part: 167(2) No limitation on other liability
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-167
schema version: 2

167(1) No limitation on other liability
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.48
note: No limitation on other liability
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-167-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 167 No limitation on other liability

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person has no liability under this Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No limitation implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (1) This Part does not limit any liability (whether criminal or civil)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must provide remedial relief even if convicted of an offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No limitation implies obligation to provide remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (1) This Part does not limit any liability (whether criminal or civil)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must provide remedial relief even if they have other liabilities under this Act or other laws
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No limitation implies obligation to provide remedial relief for other liabilities
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (1) This Part does not limit any liability (whether criminal or civil)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must provide remedial relief even if they have other liabilities under this Act or other laws, regardless of whether they are convicted of an offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No limitation implies obligation to provide remedial relief for all liabilities
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (1) This Part does not limit any liability (whether criminal or civil)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must provide remedial relief even if they have other liabilities under this Act or other laws, regardless of whether they are convicted of an offence and regardless of the type of liability
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No limitation implies obligation to provide remedial relief for all types of liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (1) This Part does not limit any liability (whether criminal or civil)

167(2) No limitation on other liability
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.48
note: No limitation on other liability for making an application under subsection 165(3) or (4)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-167-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 167 No limitation on other liability

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows making an application despite a conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: None

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-167-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 167(2) No limitation on other liability

168 Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.48
note: No exclusion or limitation of State/Territory laws
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-168-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-168
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No exclusion or limitation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

169 State or Territory courts—jurisdictional limits
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.48
note: No inferior court can grant remedial relief beyond its jurisdiction.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-169-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-169
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No remedial relief
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on granting remedial relief
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Court's jurisdictional limits

17 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
note: Definition of interception device updated
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

170 Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.48
note: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-170
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 is included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The reference to the conviction of a person of an offence is included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the reference to the conviction of a person of an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence is included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 is included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The reference to the conviction of a person of an offence is included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the reference to the conviction of a person of an offence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence is included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 170 Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of

18 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 18(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 474.4(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
note: Substitution of Act name
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to substitute the Act name
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

18(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
description: instrument of revocation, notification to applicant
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
note: Revocation of warrant by issuing authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation of warrant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on issuing warrant without compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection (2) has not been complied with

18(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.22
note: Inform another agency of revocation and provide a copy of the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must inform and provide a copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

19 Paragraph 476.5(2A)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
note: Omit specified section of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 and substitute with another section.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to omit the specified section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

2 After section 5D
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.8
note: Insert clause after section 5D
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
description: Confirmation in writing
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.24
note: Chief officer must inform Managing Director of carrier about changes in service identification.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Schedule 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
note: Replace a section with another
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Schedule 3

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

20A Paragraph 14(2A)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
note: Substitute Part 2-2 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 for Part III of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing provision with new one
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-20a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20A Paragraph 14(2A)(a)

21 Subsection 17(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
note: Substitute Act name
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Subsection 13A(6) (definition of material lawfully obtained
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.51
note: Omit and substitute laws
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

23 Subsection 18(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.51
note: Replace outdated telecommunications interception act with new one.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces an outdated obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

24 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.28
note: Making or giving information in evidence without lawful access is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Subsection 32(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.51
note: Replace outdated telecommunications act with new one.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to update the act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between lawful access and making or giving information in evidence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (i) lawfully accessed information; or (ii) information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1); or (iii) stored communications warrant information.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (i) lawfully accessed information; or (ii) information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1); or (iii) stored communications warrant information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making or giving information in evidence without lawful access.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (iii) makes a record of information; or (iv) gives information in evidence in a proceeding

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide lawful access when making or giving information in evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (i) lawfully accessed information; or (ii) information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1); or (iii) stored communications warrant information.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to provide lawful access when making or giving information in evidence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (i) lawfully accessed information; or (ii) information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1); or (iii) stored communications warrant information.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between making or giving information in evidence and lawful access.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (i) lawfully accessed information; or (ii) information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1); or (iii) stored communications warrant information.

24A Section 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.51
note: Replace outdated telecommunications interception act with new one.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to replace the act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

24B Subsection 313(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Substitute term in subsection 313(7)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24b
schema version: 2

24C Subsection 313(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Omit specified phrase and substitute with alternative phrase.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a specific phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

24D Subsection 313(8)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Substitute 'interception or access services' for 'interception services'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24d
schema version: 2

24E Subsection 313(8)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Insertion of 'or accessed' after 'intercepted'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24e
schema version: 2

24F Subsection 324(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Substitute Act name
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24f
schema version: 2

24G Section 332K (note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Replace outdated telecommunications interception act with new one.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24g
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-24g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to replace the act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

25 Title
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Prohibit access to interception and other access.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

26 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(5) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 26(6) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Part I (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new chapter title
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26(5) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
note: Employee may communicate or make use of stored communications warrant information in performance of duties.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to communicate or make use of stored communications warrant information.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(5) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

26(6) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.30
note: Employee must communicate stored communications warrant information to another carrier or employee if necessary.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-26-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(6) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

27 Section 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
note: Insert 'and Access' after 'Interception'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS

28 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Part IA (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

29 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.53
note: Defines access in relation to a stored communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 After section 6
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.11
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.34
note: Communicating intercepted information for specific purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June; and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.42
note: Agency's records can be used to derive a report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report can be derived.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Derivation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Agency's records can be used.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 June; and

30 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.53
note: Defines accessible in relation to a communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose (or 2 or more purposes) connected with: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal overlap for permitted communication.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A person to whom the information is communicated...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose (or 2 or more purposes) connected with: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines incorporation of permitted communication.
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
premise text: (2) A person to whom the information is communicated...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may communicate to another person, make use of, or make a record of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows communication of intercepted information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) A person to whom the information is communicated...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose (or 2 or more purposes) connected with: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies diffusion of permitted communication.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A person to whom the information is communicated...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for a purpose (or 2 or more purposes) connected with: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal scope for permitted communication.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) A person to whom the information is communicated...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

31 Subsection 5(1) (definition of agency)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.53
note: Definition of agency modified
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Modifies the definition of agency
modality: Deontic
operator: Modify

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for agency
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Subsection 5(1) (definition of agency)

32 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of certifying
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.53
note: List of officers who can certify stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of authorized officers
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of certifying

33 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of chief
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
note: Chief executive officer or acting chief executive officer of an agency must be added to the definition of chief officer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding a condition to a definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of chief

34 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.38
note: Chief officer must provide a written report to the Minister within 3 months after each June 30th.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Subsection 5(1) (definition of designated warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
note: Repeal definition of designated warrant information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

35 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
note: Defines 'emergency service facility'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.40
note: Giving information to an inspecting officer and access to agency records for inspection purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
note: Defines enforcement agency and its scope
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: enforcement agency has the same meaning as in section 282 of the Telecommunications Act 1997
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and includes an interception agency and an eligible authority of a State
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes interception agencies and eligible authorities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Subsection 5(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agency to provide information and access records.
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

37 Subsection 5(1) (definition of foreign communications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
note: Omit 'a warrant', substitute 'an interception warrant'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using the term 'warrant'
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition

38 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
note: Defines intended recipient of a communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Subsection 5(1)

39 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
note: Definition of interception agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-39-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-39-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of agency
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-39-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 Subsection 5(1)

4 After section 6DA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.11
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.44
note: Duty to report unlawfully accessed information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.55
note: Definition of interception warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Subsection 5(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

41 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.55
note: Definition of interception warrant information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 41(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the meaning of interception warrant information
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
premise text: Section 6EA

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Subsection 5(1)

42 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(7) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 42(8) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 42(9) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 42(10) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 42(11) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

42 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.55
note: Definition of issuing authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of issuing authority
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a term for the purpose of clarity
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Subsection 5(1)

42(10) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.46
note: Reference to punitive damages included in damages calculation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of punitive damages
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Reference to punitive damages
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: refers to

42(11) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.46
note: Exemptions from interception for issuing or executing a warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

42(7) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.46
note: Access or communication of information is unlawful without court order.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access or communication of information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

42(8) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.46
note: Court may make order with necessary provisions and terms and conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

42(9) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.46
note: Punitive damages prohibited
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-42-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Punitive damages are prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits punitive damages
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (9) A court may revoke or vary an order in the nature of an injunction made by the court under this section.

43 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.55
note: Accessing information without contravention of subsection 108(1) is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal intervals overlap
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The temporal interval of accessing information without contravention overlaps with the temporal interval of subsection 108(1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Temporal intervals exist for accessing information and subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inference is based
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The inference of accessing information without contravention is based on the inference of subsection 108(1)
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Inferences exist for accessing information and subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Accessing information without contravention is prohibited
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing information without contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 108(1) exists

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is classified based on its origin
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies 'lawfully accessed information' as information obtained by accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Definition of 'lawfully accessed information'

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Diffusions are affected
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The diffusion of accessing information without contravention is affected by the diffusion of subsection 108(1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Diffusions exist for accessing information and subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Traces are related
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The trace of accessing information without contravention is related to the trace of subsection 108(1)
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
premise text: Traces exist for accessing information and subsection 108(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-43-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Subsection 5(1)

44 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

44 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.55
note: Defines 'lawfully intercepted information'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44 Subsection 5(1)

45 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.55
note: Insert Schedule 1 Stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of schedule
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT

46 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

46 Subsection 5(1) (definition of named person warrant)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Omit 'a warrant', substitute 'an interception warrant'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
schema version: 2

47 Subsection 5(1) (definition of nominated AAT member)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Omit 'Part VI', substitute 'Part 2-5'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

48 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
schema version: 2

49 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 After section 6EA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.12
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

50 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Part III warrant)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Repeal definition of Part III warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
schema version: 2

51 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Part VI warrant)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Repeal definition of Part VI warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

52 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Definition of 'listening device' for Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-52-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of passing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Add a note about when a communication is passing over a telecommunications system.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds a note to the definition of passing over a telecommunications system.
modality: Deontic
operator: add

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term for legal purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

53 Subsection 5(1) (definition of permitted purpose)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Permits substitution of 'interception agency' for 'agency'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

54 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (a)(v) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: Omit “Part VIII”, substitute “Part 2-7”.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

54 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.58
note: No interception warrant issued in Chapter 2 (except Part 2-5) after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-54-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-54-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interception warrant issuance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) in Chapter 2 (except in Part 2-5)—an interception warrant

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

55 Subsection 5(1) (after paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.56
note: An offence against subsection 108(1) or section 133 is a prescribed offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-55-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prescribed offence implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-55-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55 Subsection 5(1) (after paragraph (b) of the definition of

56 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.57
note: Definition of publicly-listed ASIO number
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-56-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

56 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-56-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56 Subsection 5(1)

57 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.57
note: Definition of serious contravention
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with legal meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Subsection 5(1)

58 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.57
note: Definition of stored communications warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-58-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

58 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-58-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: stored communications warrant means a warrant issued under Chapter 3.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58 Subsection 5(1)

59 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.57
note: Definition of stored communications warrant information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Subsection 5(1)

5E Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5E(1) Serious contraventions
has part: 5E(2) Serious contraventions
has part: 5E(3) Serious contraventions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5e
schema version: 2

5E(1) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.8
note: Serious contraventions are prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5E Serious contraventions

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a serious contravention is a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits serious contraventions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, a serious contravention is a...

5E(2) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.8
note: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5E Serious contraventions

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be a contravention...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be a contravention...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state takes a suspected contravention to be a contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention..., or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be a contravention...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: A contravention is suspected if it has reasonable grounds.
modality: Epistemic
operator: suspected
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention..., or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be a contravention...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: A contravention is being committed if it has reasonable grounds.
modality: LTL
operator: being
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention..., or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5E(2) Serious contraventions

5E(3) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.8
note: Reference to penalty units includes reference to equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 5E Serious contraventions

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that number of penalty units includes... equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals are relevant in this context.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a reference...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that number of penalty units includes... equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal intervals are relevant in this context.
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a reference...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that number of penalty units includes... equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equivalent amounts are treated as equal in this context.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a reference...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that number of penalty units includes... equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Equivalent amounts are treated as equal in this context.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a reference...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that number of penalty units includes... equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal intervals are relevant in this context.
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a reference...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that number of penalty units includes... equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal intervals are relevant in this context.
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a reference...

5F When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5F(1) When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
has part: 5F(2) When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5f
schema version: 2

5F(1) When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.9
note: A communication starts passing over a telecommunications system when sent or transmitted.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5F When a communication is passing over a telecommunications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication passes over the system during transmission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During transmission
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) is taken to continue to pass over the system until it becomes accessible to the intended recipient of the communication.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, a communication: (a) is taken to start passing over a telecommunications system when it is sent or transmitted by the person sending the communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Communication starts
modality: Deontic
operator: starts
premise text: (a) is taken to start passing over a telecommunications system when it is sent or transmitted by the person sending the communication.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, a communication: (a) is taken to start passing over a telecommunications system when it is sent or transmitted by the person sending the communication. (b) is taken to continue to pass over the system until it becomes accessible to the intended recipient of the communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Communication continues
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (b) is taken to continue to pass over the system until it becomes accessible to the intended recipient of the communication.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication diffuses during transmission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During transmission
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (b) is taken to continue to pass over the system until it becomes accessible to the intended recipient of the communication.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication passes over the system during transmission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During transmission
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (b) is taken to continue to pass over the system until it becomes accessible to the intended recipient of the communication.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5F(1) When a communication is passing over a telecommunications

5F(2) When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.9
note: Communication from AFP address not to start passing over telecommunications system until no longer under control of specified employees.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5F When a communication is passing over a telecommunications

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until it is no longer under the control of any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Communication starts when no longer under control of specified employees
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) However, if a communication is sent from an address on a computer network operated by or on behalf of the Australian Federal Police...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is taken not to start passing over a telecommunications system, for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits passing over telecommunications system
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) However, if a communication is sent from an address on a computer network operated by or on behalf of the Australian Federal Police...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until it is no longer under the control of any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Communication ends when employee loses control
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) any AFP employee responsible for operating, protecting and maintaining the network;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5f-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until it is no longer under the control of any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Communication ends when employee loses control
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) any AFP employee responsible for enforcement of the professional standards of the Australian Federal Police.

5G The intended recipient of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5G(1) The intended recipient of a communication
has part: 5G(2) The intended recipient of a communication
has part: 5G(3) The intended recipient of a communication
has part: 5G(4) The intended recipient of a communication
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5g
schema version: 2

5G(1) The intended recipient of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
note: Defines intended recipient of a communication
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5G The intended recipient of a communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5G(1) The intended recipient of a communication

5G(2) The intended recipient of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
note: Intended recipients of a communication addressed to an AFP employee or the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5G The intended recipient of a communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) any AFP employee responsible for operating, protecting and maintaining the network;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the operation and maintenance of the network.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) In addition to the person who is the intended recipient of a communication under subsection (1), if a communication is addressed to a person at an address on a computer network operated by or on behalf of the Australian Federal Police, each of the following is also an intended recipient of the communication for the purposes of this Act:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) any AFP employee responsible for operating, protecting and maintaining the network;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes AFP employees and their superiors.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) In addition to the person who is the intended recipient of a communication under subsection (1), if a communication is addressed to a person at an address on a computer network operated by or on behalf of the Australian Federal Police, each of the following is also an intended recipient of the communication for the purposes of this Act:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) any AFP employee responsible for enforcement of the professional standards of the Australian Federal Police;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes enforcement personnel.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) In addition to the person who is the intended recipient of a communication under subsection (1), if a communication is addressed to a person at an address on a computer network operated by or on behalf of the Australian Federal Police, each of the following is also an intended recipient of the communication for the purposes of this Act:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) any AFP employee responsible for enforcement of the professional standards of the Australian Federal Police;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During the enforcement of professional standards.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) In addition to the person who is the intended recipient of a communication under subsection (1), if a communication is addressed to a person at an address on a computer network operated by or on behalf of the Australian Federal Police, each of the following is also an intended recipient of the communication for the purposes of this Act:

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5G(2) The intended recipient of a communication

5G(3) The intended recipient of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
note: Ceases to have effect after 2 years from commencement
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 5G The intended recipient of a communication

5G(4) The intended recipient of a communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
note: Reference to intended recipient of communication is taken to be a reference to an intended recipient of the communication.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 5G The intended recipient of a communication

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5G(4) The intended recipient of a communication

5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
has part: 5H(2) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5h
schema version: 2

5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
note: A communication is accessible to its intended recipient if it has been received, stored under control, or delivered.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication is accessible during the time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During a time period, a communication is accessible to its intended recipient
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A communication is accessible to its intended recipient if it has been received, stored under control, or delivered.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action then results in the communication being accessible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Then a communication is accessible to its intended recipient
modality: CogAI
operator: then
premise text: A communication is accessible to its intended recipient if it has been received, stored under control, or delivered.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recipient has access to the communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has access to a communication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAccess
premise text: The communication is accessible to its intended recipient.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The condition is met and the communication is accessible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If a condition is met, a communication is accessible to its intended recipient
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: A communication is accessible to its intended recipient if it has been received, stored under control, or delivered.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The communication is not accessible after the point in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Until a certain point in time, a communication is accessible to its intended recipient
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: A communication is accessible to its intended recipient if it has been received, stored under control, or delivered.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient

5H(2) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
note: No limitation on accessibility for the purposes of this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-5h-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient

6 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.10
note: Ceases effect after 2 years from commencement
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 After subsection 9(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.12
note: Reference to stored communications includes accessing of communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of stored communications in the reference.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Stored communications are a subclass of telecommunications services.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 After subsection 9(1)

60 Subsection 5(1) (definition of telecommunications service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'a warrant', substitute 'an interception warrant'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-60-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

60 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with new interception warrant information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-60-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60-2
schema version: 2

61 Subsection 5(1) (definition of telephone application)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Part VI warrant' and substitute with 'Part 2-5 warrant or a stored communications warrant'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-61-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

62 Subsection 5(1) (definition of warrant)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.57
note: Definition of warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-62-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-62-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

62 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.66
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-62-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-62-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies warrant into types
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

63 Section 5B
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.58
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'A reference in this Act'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

64 At the end of section 5B
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.58
note: References to certain proceedings are excluded from exemptions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-64-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

64 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-64-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluded references cannot be exempted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-64-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: References are included in the list of excluded references.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

65 Subsection 5C(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Part VIII', substitute 'Part 2-7 or 3-5'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-65-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

66 Subsection 6(2A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Modify definition of emergency service facility
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-66-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

67 Subsection 6(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Substitute 'A' for 'In this section, a'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-67-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

68 Subsections 6DA(1) and (4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Part VI', substitute 'Part 2-5 or 3-3'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

69 Subsection 6E(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Modify subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-69-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Change to subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: Modification

6AA Accessing a stored communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.11
note: Accessing a stored communication without knowledge of the recipient is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6aa-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communication without knowledge of the recipient.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6aa-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as prohibition for accessing stored communication.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6aa-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6AA Accessing a stored communication

6DB Issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6DB(1) Issuing authorities
has part: 6DB(2) Issuing authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6db
schema version: 2

6DB(1) Issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.11
note: Minister may appoint issuing authorities
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6db-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6DB Issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to appoint issuing authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DB(1) Issuing authorities

6DB(2) Issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.11
note: A person who is issuing authorities must store communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6db-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6DB Issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide stored communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Issuing authorities must store communications.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6db-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DB(2) Issuing authorities

6EB Stored communications warrant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.12
note: Information about stored communications warrant applications, issues, existence, and expiry.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6eb-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6eb-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6eb-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6eb
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6eb-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between stored communications warrant issuance and expiry
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Information about stored communications warrant applications, issues, existence, and expiry.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-6eb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6EB Stored communications warrant information

7 After subsection 9A(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.13
note: Inserts a reference to accessing stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

70 Subsections 6E(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Subsection 6E(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-71-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

72 Section 6EA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'designated warrant information', substitute 'interception warrant information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

73 Section 6EA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'a warrant' and substitute 'an interception warrant'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

74 Section 6H
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Substitute Part 2-5 for Part VI
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-74-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Section 6H

75 Paragraph 6H(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Substitute warrant part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-75-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace warrant part
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

76 At the end of section 6H
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Add paragraph 116(1)(d) to section 6H
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-76-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 At the end of section 6H

77 Paragraph 6L(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Substitute paragraph 5B(1)(c) for paragraph 5B(c)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-77-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

78 Paragraph 6L(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Substitute paragraph 5B(1)(d) for paragraph 5B(d)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

79 Part II (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new chapter title
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-79-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
schema version: 2

8 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
has part: 8(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 After subsection 10(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.13
note: Clarifies interception not commencing
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

8(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.12
note: Appointment ceases if the person is no longer eligible for appointment or is revoked by the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person’s appointment ceases to have effect if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Appointment can only occur within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the person ceases to be a person whom the Minister could appoint under this section;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person’s appointment ceases to have effect if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Appointment can only occur within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the Minister, by writing, revokes the appointment;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits appointment if conditions are not met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person ceases to be a person whom the Minister could appoint under this section;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits appointment if revoked by the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) the Minister, by writing, revokes the appointment;

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

8(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.12
note: Issuing authority has same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-8-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(4) Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

80 Paragraph 7(2)(ad)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-80-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
schema version: 2

81 Subsections 7(3) and (3A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-81-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
schema version: 2

82 Paragraphs 7(4)(c) and (5)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Omit “Part VI warrant”, substitute ‘Part 2-5 warrant’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-82-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
schema version: 2

83 Subsections 7(6) and (6A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.60
note: Omit 'Part VI warrant', substitute 'Part 2-5 warrant'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-83-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
schema version: 2

84 Paragraphs 7(10)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Omit “Part VI warrant”, substitute ‘Part 2-5 warrant’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-84-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
schema version: 2

85 Part III (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-85-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
schema version: 2

86 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Omit 'Part III warrants', substitute 'Part 2-2 warrants'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-86-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
schema version: 2

87 Section 13
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Substitute warrant in Part III with warrant in Part 2-2.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-87-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
schema version: 2

88 Paragraph 14(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Substitute warrant terminology
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-88-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
schema version: 2

89 Subsection 15(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Omit 'Part III warrant', substitute 'Part 2-2 warrant'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-89-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
schema version: 2

9 After Part XA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.13
note: Insert Chapter 3—Access to stored communications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

90 Subsection 17(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Omit ‘Part III warrant’, substitute ‘Part 2-2 warrant’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-90-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
schema version: 2

91 Part V (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-91-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
schema version: 2

92 Part VI (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-92-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
schema version: 2

93 Subparagraph 35(1)(d)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Omit “Part IX”, substitute ‘Part 2-8’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-93-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
schema version: 2

94 Paragraph 53(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Substitute warrant part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-94-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
schema version: 2

95 Subsection 55(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Omit “Part VI warrant”, substitute ‘Part 2-5 warrant’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-95-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-95-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-95-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval classification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Omit ‘Part VI warrant’ and substitute ‘Part 2-5 warrant’

96 Paragraph 61(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Substitute warrant part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-96-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
schema version: 2

97 Part VII (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-97-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-97
schema version: 2

98 Subsection 63(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Omit 'lawfully obtained information', substitute 'lawfully intercepted information'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-98-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-98
schema version: 2

99 Subsection 63(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.62
note: Replace 'designated warrant information' with 'interception warrant information'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-1-sec-99-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-99
schema version: 2

1 After subparagraph 9(1)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.68
note: Requires means for communication with suspected security activities
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires means for communication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Inserts new clause
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: inserts

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 After subparagraph 9(1)(a)(i)

10 Subsection 49(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.69
note: Modify time limit for certain actions
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Change obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: modify

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Subsection 49(3)

11 After paragraph 100(1)(ec)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.69
note: Insert Schedule 2 B-party interception
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 After paragraph 100(2)(ec)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.70
note: Relevant statistics about applications of a kind related to warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 At the end of paragraphs 101(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.70
note: Add “and”.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State must add “and”.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 At the end of paragraphs 101(1)(a), (b) and (c)

14 After paragraph 101(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.70
note: Defines averages for periods related to warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 At the end of paragraphs 101(2)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.70
note: Add “and”.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 At the end of paragraphs 101(2)(a), (b) and (c)

16 After paragraph 101(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.70
note: Calculate averages of periods related to warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 After paragraph 101(2)(d)

2 At the end of subsection 9(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.68
note: Restricts issuing of warrants under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection (3)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing of warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Subparagraph (a)(ia)

3 At the end of section 9
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.68
note: The Attorney-General must not issue a warrant in certain cases.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The Attorney-General must not issue a warrant

4 Subsection 9B(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.68
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The omitted phrase overlaps with a prohibited action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates overlap between omission and prohibited action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Omit ‘period must not exceed 6 months, and the’.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The omitted phrase is recognized as prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Indicates recognition of omission as prohibited.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Omit ‘period must not exceed 6 months, and the’.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The omitted phrase should be removed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘period must not exceed 6 months, and the’.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The omitted phrase is diffused by a prohibition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Indicates diffusion of prohibition to omission.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Omit ‘period must not exceed 6 months, and the’.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The omitted phrase is until a prohibited action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indicates temporal relationship between omission and prohibited action.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Omit ‘period must not exceed 6 months, and the’.

5 After subsection 9B(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.68
note: The specified period must not exceed 3 months if subparagraph 9(1)(a)(ia) applies, or 6 months otherwise.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duration restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotExceed

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 After subsection 9B(3)

6 At the end of paragraphs 46(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.69
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraphs 46(1)(a), (b) and (c)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 At the end of paragraphs 46(1)(a), (b) and (c)

66 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.70
note: Relevant statistics about applications of a kind referred to in subparagraph 46(1)(d)(ii) must be provided.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-66-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relevant statistics about applications of a kind referred to in subparagraph 46(1)(d)(ii) must be provided.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

68 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
schema version: 2

7 Paragraph 46(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.69
note: Modify communication clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Modify obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Paragraph 46(1)(d)

8 At the end of subsection 46(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.69
note: Restricts issuing of warrants under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing of warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

9 At the end of section 46
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.69
note: No warrant can be issued unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No warrant can be issued unless certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

1 Subsection 5(1) (definition of equipment)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.72
note: Inserts 'and includes a telecommunications device' after 'network'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Saving provision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.75
note: Saving provision for equipment-based interception
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 After paragraph 11B(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.76
note: Details sufficient to identify telecommunications device must be included in warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for warrant requirements
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 After paragraph 11B(2)(b)

12 At the end of section 11B (before the note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.76
note: The Attorney-General must not issue a warrant for interception of communications unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Organisation must consider the practicability of interception at the time of application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Justification for warrant issuance requires consideration of practicable methods at the time of application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Interception of communications made to or from a telecommunications service used, or likely to be used, by that person or foreign organisation would not otherwise be practicable.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must not issue a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of warrant issuance without justification
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The Attorney-General must issue a warrant.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Organisation must consider the foreign organisation's telecommunications services used or likely to be used.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification for warrant issuance requires consideration of foreign organisation's telecommunications services used or likely to be used
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Interception of communications made to or from a telecommunications service used, or likely to be used, by that person or foreign organisation would not otherwise be practicable.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Organisation must consider its resources at the time of application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification for warrant issuance requires consideration of Organisation's resources at the time of application
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: There are no other practicable methods available to the Organisation at the time of making the application.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Organisation must consider the person or foreign organisation's telecommunications services used or likely to be used.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification for warrant issuance requires consideration of person or foreign organisation's telecommunications services used or likely to be used
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: Interception of communications made to or from a telecommunications service used, or likely to be used, by that person or foreign organisation would not otherwise be practicable.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Organisation must identify the telecommunications services used or likely to be used.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Justification for warrant issuance requires identification of telecommunications services used or likely to be used
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: There are no other practicable methods available to the Organisation at the time of making the application.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 At the end of section 11B (before the note)

13 After paragraph 16(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.76
note: Exclusion of interception of communications made by means of a telecommunications device identified in the warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on interception
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of interception
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
premise text: Warrant does not authorise interception

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exclusion of interception
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identification of telecommunications device
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Identify
premise text: Telecommunications device identified in the warrant

14 After subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.76
note: Certifying person must provide description of device to Managing Director of carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide description
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Device identification class inclusion
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 After subsection 16(1)

15 Paragraph 16(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.77
note: Insertion of phrase after 'from which'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Paragraph 16(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.77
note: Insertion of phrase after 'that service'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 After paragraph 42(4A)(b)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.77
note: Details of telecommunications device must be provided
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-17-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Details of telecommunications device are sufficient for identification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 After paragraph 42(4A)(b)

18 Paragraph 46A(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.77
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with prohibition on intercepting communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interception of communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes new provision for repealed paragraph.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute

19 At the end of subsection 46A(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.78
note: Restricts issuing of a warrant authorising interception of communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a warrant for interception.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Restricts issuance of a warrant.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Restrict

2 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.72
note: Defines telecommunications device
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Paragraph 46A(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.78
note: Specify the scope of interception under a warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Paragraph 46A(2)(a)

21 At the end of section 46A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.78
note: Must not issue warrant for interception of communications without certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-21-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-21-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-21-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal conditions for warrant issuance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: there are no other practicable methods available to the agency at the time of making the application

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: must not
premise text: there are no other practicable methods available to the agency at the time of making the application

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-21-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Conditions for warrant issuance
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has condition
premise text: interception of communications made by means of a telecommunications device identified in the warrant unless he or she is satisfied that...

22 After paragraph 60(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.78
note: Prohibition on warrant-based interception of communications made by means of a telecommunications device identified in the warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-22-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-22-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of warrant-based interception
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

23 After subsection 60(4)
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.79
note: Certifying person must provide description of device to Managing Director of carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-23-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-23-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Device description class
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 After subsection 60(4)

24 Paragraph 60(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.79
note: Insertion of a particular device or means after 'particular service'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.72
note: Definition of telecommunications number
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between carrier address and communication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of telecommunications number
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for telecommunications numbers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 5(1)

4 At the end of Part IA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.72
note: Add at the end of Part IA
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 9A(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5(1) Subsection 9A(1)
has part: 5(1A) Subsection 9A(1)
has part: 5(1B) Subsection 9A(1)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

5(1) Subsection 9A(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.73
note: The Attorney-General must issue a warrant under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Subsection 9A(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General is satisfied that: (a) the person is engaged in, or reasonably suspected by the Director-General of Security of being engaged in, or of being likely to engage in, activities prejudicial to security; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General has an obligation to issue a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(1) Subsection 9A(1)

5(1A) Subsection 9A(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.73
note: Authorises interception of communications under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Subsection 9A(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Intercepts communications during specified time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1A) The warrant authorises persons approved under section 12 in respect of the warrant to intercept...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognises communications as subject to interception.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
premise text: (1A) The warrant authorises persons approved under section 12 in respect of the warrant to intercept...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises interception of communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The warrant authorises persons approved under section 12 in respect of the warrant to intercept...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies communications as subject to interception.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (1A) The warrant authorises persons approved under section 12 in respect of the warrant to intercept...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Intercepts communications through specified device.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (1A) The warrant authorises persons approved under section 12 in respect of the warrant to intercept...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Intercepts communications repeatedly during specified time period.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (1A) The warrant authorises persons approved under section 12 in respect of the warrant to intercept...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(1A) Subsection 9A(1)

5(1B) Subsection 9A(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.73
note: Authorises entry on premises for equipment installation, maintenance, use or recovery.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Subsection 9A(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1B) The warrant may authorise entry...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(1B) Subsection 9A(1)

6 Saving provision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
note: Saving provision for warrants issued under subsection 9A(1) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant issued before commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between warrant issuance and Schedule commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Before the commencement...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Does not affect the validity...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to preserve the validity of warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The repeal and substitution...

6Q Identification of telecommunications device
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.72
note: A telecommunications device must be identified by a unique identifier.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6q
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must identify telecommunications device
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-6q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6Q Identification of telecommunications device

7 After paragraph 9A(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
note: Warrant must include details to identify telecommunications device
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identify telecommunications device
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 After paragraph 9A(2)(b)

70 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-70
schema version: 2

72 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.76
note: Validity of warrants issued under subsection 11B(1) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-72-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-72
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Validity of warrant unaffected
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to uphold warrant validity
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Warrant issued under subsection 11B(1)

74 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.78
note: Assistance in connection with investigation of class 2 offence
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-74-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-74
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to assist in investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

76 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-76-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-76
schema version: 2

8 At the end of section 9A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
note: The Attorney-General must not issue a warrant for interception of communications without satisfying certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless satisfied with certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The Attorney-General must not issue a warrant.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of warrants
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Warrant issuance is subject to conditions.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 At the end of section 9A

9 Subsection 11B(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Subsection 11B(1)
has part: 9(1A) Subsection 11B(1)
has part: 9(1B) Subsection 11B(1)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

9(1) Subsection 11B(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
note: The Attorney-General may issue a warrant for the interception of communications.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Subsection 11B(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant must be issued before the specified timeframe expires.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The warrant is issued within a specific timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: The Attorney-General is satisfied that the interception is necessary within a certain timeframe.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A warrant can be issued for the interception of communications.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Attorney-General.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: The Attorney-General may issue a warrant.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must issue a warrant if requested by the Director-General of Security.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General has an obligation to issue a warrant if requested by the Director-General of Security.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Director-General of Security gives a notice in writing to the Attorney-General requesting the Attorney-General to issue a warrant.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General has permission to issue a warrant for the interception of communications.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General has permission to issue a warrant for the interception of communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant in respect of a person.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Foreign intelligence is a matter specified in the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Communications intercepted under this section are related to foreign intelligence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: The warrant is issued for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant can be renewed for recurring interceptions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The warrant can be renewed for recurring interceptions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The Attorney-General may issue a warrant under this section authorising persons approved under section 12.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) Subsection 11B(1)

9(1A) Subsection 11B(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
note: Authorises interception of communications under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Subsection 11B(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises interception of communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies communications to be intercepted.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) communications that are being made to or from any telecommunications service...

9(1B) Subsection 11B(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.74
note: Authorises entry on premises for equipment installation, maintenance, use or recovery.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Subsection 11B(1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1B) The warrant may authorise entry...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1B) Subsection 11B(1)

1 Subsection 5(1) (definition of class 1 offence)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
note: Repeal the definition of class 1 offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Subsection 5D(5A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.81
note: Omit 'Division 307 or'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Subsection 5D(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.81
note: Omit 'class 2 offence', substitute 'serious offence'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Subsection 5D(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.81
note: Omit 'class 2 offence', substitute 'serious offence'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 At the end of section 5D
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.81
note: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence constituted by receiving or assisting a person who is, to the offender’s knowledge, guilty of a serious offence mentioned in subsection (1),
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: offence is an offence constituted by receiving or assisting a person who is, to the offender’s knowledge, guilty of a serious offence mentioned in subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: offence is an offence constituted by receiving or assisting a person who is, to the offender’s knowledge, guilty of a serious offence mentioned in subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: offence is an offence constituted by receiving or assisting a person who is, to the offender’s knowledge, guilty of a serious offence mentioned in subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: offence is an offence constituted by receiving or assisting a person who is, to the offender’s knowledge, guilty of a serious offence mentioned in subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: offence is an offence constituted by receiving or assisting a person who is, to the offender’s knowledge, guilty of a serious offence mentioned in subsection (1)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 At the end of section 5D

14 Paragraph 6H(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Repeal paragraph 6H(a)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits warrant under section 48
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15 Paragraph 6H(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Omit specified provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16 Subsection 7(9)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with new provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation purposes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between serious offence and investigation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Subsection (6)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal and substitution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of serious offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection (9)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-16-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subsection 7(9)

17 Sections 45 and 45A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Repeal sections
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Paragraphs 46(1)(d) and 46A(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Omit specific wording from headings.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

19 Section 47
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Omit '45, 45A',.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 5(1) (definition of class 2 offence)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
note: Repeal the definition of class 2 offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 48(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Omit '45 or' from text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Paragraph 48(3)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Omit “45 or” from Schedule 4, Class 1 and class 2 offences.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of “45 or”.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

22 Subparagraph 48(3)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Omit “45 or”.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Paragraph 49(7)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Repeal paragraph 46(1)(d)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Paragraph 49(7)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Omit specified provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

25 Subsection 54(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Omit specified section numbers.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-25-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of section numbers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

26 Subsection 61(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Omit '45, 45A',.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 Subparagraph 81A(2)(g)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Repeal of subparagraph 81A(2)(g)(i)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of subparagraph 81A(2)(g)(i)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

28 Subparagraph 81A(2)(g)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Omit specified provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-28-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

29 Subparagraph 81C(2)(g)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Repeal subparagraph 81C(2)(g)(i)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 5(1) (definition of named person warrant)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
note: Omit ‘, 45A’
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, 45A’
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30 Subparagraph 81C(2)(g)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.83
note: Omit specified sections.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified sections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

31 Pending applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.84
note: Application of amended Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 to pending warrant applications
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-31-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

32 Continuation of warrants under sections 45 and 45A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.84
note: Continuation of warrants under sections 45 and 45A
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Warrants under sections 46, 46A and 48 unaffected
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.84
note: Warrants under sections 46, 46A and 48 unaffected
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 Warrants under sections 46, 46A and 48 unaffected

34 Renewals of warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.85
note: Renewal of warrants issued after commencement under section 46 or 46A
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Renewal of warrant issued before commencement under section 45 or 45A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between warrants
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Commencement under section 46 or 46A

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Renewal of warrant issued before commencement under section 46 or 46A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of warrants using CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: Section 45 or 45A

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Renewal of warrant issued before commencement under section 45 or 45A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Renewal of warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: Renewal
premise text: Section 46 or 46A

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Renewal of warrant issued before commencement under section 45 or 45A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of warrant renewals
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: Section 46 or 46A

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Renewal of warrant issued before commencement under section 45 or 45A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of warrant renewals
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Section 46 or 46A

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Renewals of warrants

4 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with a new definition of a serious offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraph.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

5 Subsection 5(1) (definition of serious offence)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
note: Repeal definition, substitute with new meaning.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 5(1) (definition of telecommunications service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
note: Omit '45,'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting '45,',
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

7 Subsection 5D(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.80
note: Defines serious offences
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 72, 101, 102 or 103 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: An offence is a serious offence if it is...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an offence against Division 72, 101, 102 or 103 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An offence is a serious offence if it is...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an agency other than the ACC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An offence in relation to which the ACC is conducting a special investigation.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: except for the purposes of an application for a warrant by an agency other than the ACC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: >
premise text: An offence in relation to which the ACC is conducting a special investigation.

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Subsection 5D(1)

78 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.82
note: Enable person to escape punishment or dispose of proceeds.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006

8 Subsection 5D(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.81
note: Omit 'is a class 2 offence', substitute 'is also a serious offence'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
schema version: 2

80 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-80-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-80
schema version: 2

82 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-82-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82
schema version: 2

9 Subsections 5D(2A), (3), (3A), (4), (5) and (5A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.81
note: Omit 'class 2 offence', substitute 'serious offence'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'class 2 offence'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (a)(v) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
note: Omit certain references to the Chief Executive Officer of the ACC.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (a)(v) of the definition of

10 Section 56
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
note: Repeal section
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Subsections 57(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Subsections 57(1) and (2)
has part: 11(2) Subsections 57(1) and (2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
schema version: 2

11(1) Subsections 57(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
note: Notify other agencies of warrant revocation proposal.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Subsections 57(1) and (2)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must notify other agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

11(2) Subsections 57(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
note: Revocation of warrant by chief officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Subsections 57(1) and (2)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer can revoke warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The chief officer of an agency may at any time...

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-11-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(2) Subsections 57(1) and (2)

12 Paragraphs 57(3)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 At the end of section 57
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Section does not apply in relation to a warrant that has ceased to be in force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 58(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Ensure discontinuation of communications interceptions upon warrant revocation or proposed revocation.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure discontinuation of communications interceptions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15 Subsection 58(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Omit specified text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16 Section 59
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Substitute 'Secretary of the Department' for 'Commissioner of Police'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-16
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Section 59

17 Paragraph 60(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 61(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Saving provision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Preserves effect of certificate issued under subsection 61(3) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Division 1 of Part 2-5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
note: Repeal Division
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 61(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.89
note: Omit “(3) or”.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 79(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.89
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Part 2-7 (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.89
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Sections 80 and 81
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.89
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Subsections 81A(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.91
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Saving provision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.91
note: Saving provision for General Register of Warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 81B(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.91
note: Deliver General Register to Minister for inspection within 3 months after commencement of Schedule 5.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-26-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-26
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies a temporal interval for delivery of the General Register.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Secretary of the Department.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Subsection 81B(1)

27 Subsection 81B(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.91
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Subsections 81C(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Saving provision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
note: Saving provision for Special Register of Warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-29-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-29
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: after that commencement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: before the commencement of this item

3 Paragraph 35(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
note: Omit subsections and impose on chief officer of a Commonwealth agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Paragraph 35(1)(a)

30 Subsection 81D(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
note: Deliver Special Register to Minister within 3 months after Schedule 5 commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-30
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on Secretary of Department
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

31 Subsections 81D(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Subsection 81E(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
note: Substitute 'Secretary of the Department' for 'Commissioner of Police'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-32-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-32
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Subsection 81E(2)

33 Subsection 81E(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
note: Substitute 'Secretary' for 'Commissioner of Police'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-33
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 Subsection 81E(2)

34 Saving provision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
note: Notice given under section 81E of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 has effect after commencement as if it were a notice by the Secretary.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-34-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-34
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Saving provision

35 Section 82
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.93
note: Repeal section
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 At the end of paragraph 86(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.93
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraph 86(1)(a)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-36
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 At the end of paragraph 86(1)(a)

37 After paragraph 86(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.93
note: Entitlement to access registers
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-37-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-37
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must provide access
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the right to access
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: Agent has entitlement

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-37-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 37 After paragraph 86(1)(b)

38 Paragraph 86(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.93
note: Insert 'or the General Register or Special Register' after 'agency'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-38
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory insertion
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Paragraph 86(1)(c)

39 At the end of section 86
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.93
note: The Ombudsman's powers include doing anything incidental or conducive to the performance of any of the Ombudsman’s functions under this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-39-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-39
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision includes the Ombudsman's powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 At the end of section 86

4 Section 47
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
schema version: 2

47 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
note: Limit on authority conferred by warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-47-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-47
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interception prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interception of communications without carrier notification
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Notification required for warrant issuance

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-47-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47 Limit on authority conferred by warrant

5 Subsection 52(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
note: Omit 'other than the Australian Federal Police'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
schema version: 2

54 Entry into force of warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
note: Entry into force of warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-54-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-54-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-54
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-54-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Defines entry into force of warrants

6 Paragraphs 52(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.86
note: Replace 'Commissioner of Police' with 'Secretary of the Department'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omission
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Paragraphs 52(2)(a) and (b)

7 Subsection 53(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
note: Omit 'other than the Australian Federal Police'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Paragraphs 53(1)(a), (b) and (d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
note: Omit 'Commissioner of Police', substitute 'Secretary of the Department'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
schema version: 2

80 Commonwealth agencies to keep documents connected with issue
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.89
note: Keep documents connected with issue of warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-80-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-80
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must keep documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80 Commonwealth agencies to keep documents connected with issue

81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(1) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
has part: 81(2) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
has part: 81(3) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-81
schema version: 2

81(1) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
type: Concept
description: Particulars of each telephone application, warrant issuance, and interception.
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.90
note: Agency must keep records of telephone applications, warrant issuances, and interceptions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-81-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must keep records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Records are particulars of telephone applications, warrant issuances, and interceptions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in

81(2) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.90
note: Particulars of interception service must be indicated for named person warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-81-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(2) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in

81(3) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.90
note: Agency must keep records made under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-81-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-81-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(3) Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in

84 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.88
note: Revoke warrant forthwith.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-84-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-84
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

86 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-86-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-86
schema version: 2

88 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-88-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-88
schema version: 2

9 Section 54
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.87
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
schema version: 2

90 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-5-sec-90-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-90
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (f)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with an investigation into serious misconduct.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the repeal of a subparagraph.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (f)(ii) of the definition of

10 Paragraphs 81C(3)(a) and (4)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.95
note: Insertion of 'has been issued' after 'warrant'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a word into text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

2 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Add “or” at the end of paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of the definition of prescribed offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a), (b) and (c) at the end
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Adding temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Add
premise text: The definition of prescribed offence has a start time

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a), (b) and (c) are added
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Adding to a cognitive agent's knowledge
modality: CogAI
operator: Add
premise text: The definition of prescribed offence is being processed by the agent

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a), (b) and (c) or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding to a set
modality: Deontic
operator: Add
premise text: The definition of prescribed offence includes (a), (b) and (c)

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a), (b) and (c) are added
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Adding to a diffusion process
modality: Diffusion
operator: Add
premise text: The definition of prescribed offence is being updated

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a), (b) and (c) in the sequence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Adding to an ordered trace
modality: LTL
operator: Add
premise text: The definition of prescribed offence has a sequence of paragraphs

3 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Definition of Whistleblowers Protection Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Paragraph 5D(4)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute Division 1A of Part IV of the Crimes Act 1900.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

5 Subsection 6(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 7(11)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Omit “(1)” from the text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 55(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.94
note: Insert 'or an employee of a carrier' after 'designated officer'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Section 78
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.95
note: Omit “in Part IIA or”.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sch-6-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘in Part IIA or’.

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
note: Table of sections and commencement provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 July 2006.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 July 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 October 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 October 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 February 1994
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-7
schema version: 2

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act comes into force on the specified day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on a specific day
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
premise text: The Act receives Royal Assent

13 June 2006
type: Concept
references: F2006L01623
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
note: See F2006L01623 for further information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement rules for each provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of provisions
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

3 May 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.5
note: Schedule 4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 November
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-3
schema version: 2

3 May 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-3-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-4
schema version: 2

3 May 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-3-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-5
schema version: 2

3 May 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-3-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-6
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule items have effect according to their terms.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-3-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-7
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 5 commencement provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: first day after end of that period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines commencement period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 6 months beginning on the day of Royal Assent

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of item 10 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment (Stored Communications and Other Measures) Act 2005.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of item 10 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment (Stored Communications and Other Measures) Act 2005.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

9 Section 9
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of section 17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-amendment-act-2006-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section 17 commencement triggers the effect

Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Act 2006
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979, and for related purposes
identifier: No. 40 of 2006
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU