1 Part IIIA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Repeal Part IIIA of the Criminal Code Act 1995
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal Part IIIA
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Part IIIA

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Defines sexual activity for the purpose of the Criminal Code.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies concepts into categories.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Dictionary in the Criminal Code

10(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: No fault element for physical element of underlying offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No fault element for physical element of underlying offence
modality: Deontic
operator: no-fault-element
premise text: (2) There is no fault element...

10(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Avoidance of underlying offence commitment
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commitment and defence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defence implies avoidance of commitment
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion from committing the underlying offence
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defence as a condition for avoiding commitment
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commitment and defence
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)

10(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Absolute liability applies to subparagraph (1)(b)(i).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

10(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Prohibition on strict liability for subparagraph (1)(b)(ii)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

10(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears a legal burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must believe the child did not have a mental impairment.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Condition applies to specific time frame.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

10(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Triers of fact may consider the reasonableness of an alleged belief in determining whether a defendant had such a belief.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(3) Section 11
has part: 11(4) Section 11
has part: 11(5) Section 11
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Defines sexual intercourse as per section 272.4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

11(3) Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Exemptions from attempt offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain offences from attempt liability
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (3) Section 11.1 (attempt) does not apply to an offence against: (a) section 272.14 (procuring child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia); or (b) section 272.15 (“grooming” child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia); or (c) section 272.20 (preparing for or planning offence against this Division).

11(4) Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Section 11.4 (incitement) does not apply to an offence against this Division.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

11(5) Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Section 11.5 does not apply to an offence against section 272.19.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 272.19 overlaps with Section 11.5.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 11.5 overlaps with section 272.19 in terms of applicability.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 11.5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is not affected.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 11.5 implies that section 272.19 is not affected.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section 11.5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is exempted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 11.5 exempts section 272.19 from its application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: Section 11.5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is diffused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section 11.5 diffuses the applicability of section 272.19.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Section 11.5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is not affected by its application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Section 11.5 implies that section 272.19 is not affected by its application.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: Section 11.5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(5) Section 11

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 12(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 12(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 12(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 At the end of Division 470 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

12(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 272.28.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (10) and section 272.28 overlap.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Subsection (10) overlaps with section 272.28.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (9)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 272.28.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes subsection (9) from preventing alternative verdicts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (10)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 272.28 is identical to subsection (10).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 272.28 repeats subsection (10).
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (9)

12(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Prohibition on re-conviction of certain sex crimes against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section at the same time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exclusion of temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: Convicted or acquitted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on re-conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Convicted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on re-conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Convicted or acquitted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on re-conviction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of sex crimes against children
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section in the future
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition on re-conviction over time
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Prohibition
premise text: Convicted or acquitted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

12(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Judge must warn jury of subsection (7) requirements in proceedings for an offence against this section.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (if any) of the requirements of subsection (7)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Warning is a temporal interval contained within proceedings under this section
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Proceedings for an offence against this section

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of the requirements of subsection (7)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Warning implies that the judge has a duty to inform the jury
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Judge must warn jury

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of the requirements of subsection (7)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to warn jury
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Judge must warn jury

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

12(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Prohibition on reconviction for related offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reconviction
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

13 Before section 471.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Insert: Subdivision A—General postal offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 At the end of Division 471 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Offences relating to use of postal or similar service for child pornography material or child abuse material
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of postal or similar service for child pornography material or child abuse material
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

14(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Engaging in conduct that causes a young person to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 7 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct causing sexual activity outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

14(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b) of section 14(3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Intention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Fault element is specified
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

14(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

14(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Strict liability for certain crimes
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

14(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Defence to prosecution for an offence against subsections (1) or (2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (6) It is a defence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

15 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Section defines 'use' in relation to carriage services.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

15YT Video link evidence provisions relating to child sex offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Relates to child sex offences, unaffected by this Part
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15yt-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15yt
schema version: 2

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Does not matter that child is a fictitious person for purposes of subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 At the end of Division 473 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

17 Subdivision C of Division 474 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Repeal and substitute heading
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Section 474.13 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Repeal section 474.13 of the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

19 After section 474.18 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Insertion of new subdivision D relating to use of carriage service for child pornography material or child abuse material
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using carriage service for child pornography material or child abuse material
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: State regulation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 After section 474.18 of the Criminal Code

2 Subsection 7.3(8) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Omit “section”, substitute “Code”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Paragraph 474.19(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Accessing or transmitting material using a carriage service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Paragraph 474.19(1)(a) of the Criminal Code

20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Encouraging or aiding a child sexual offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) In this section, the obligation applies to actions taken after commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) not encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) not aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits encouraging or aiding a child sexual offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) not aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits aiding or facilitating a child sexual offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) In this section, not aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits aiding or facilitating a child sexual offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) In this section, 'encourage' means an action that aids or facilitates a child sexual offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies 'encourage' as a child sexual offence action
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) In this section, the obligation applies to recurring actions that aid or facilitate a child sexual offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the scope of the obligation as a recurring action
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

21 Subsection 474.19(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Definition of 'appropriate persons' for court consideration.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 After subsection 474.19(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(aa)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 After subsection 474.19(2) of the Criminal Code

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

23 Subsection 474.20(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Alternative verdicts for certain subsections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Paragraph 474.22(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Accessing or transmitting material using a carriage service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Paragraph 474.22(1)(a) of the Criminal Code

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits alternative verdicts
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

25 Subsection 474.22(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Reference to Part 10.6 in Section 473.4 is redirected to this Division.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 After subsection 474.22(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(aa)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 After subsection 474.22(2) of the Criminal Code

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Division
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Redirects reference to Part 10.6
modality: Deontic
operator: Redirects
premise text: Section 473.4

27 Subsection 474.23(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Definition of 'cause a person to engage in sexual intercourse or other sexual activity'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272
schema version: 2

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
has part: 272(5) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Engaging in sexual activity with a child under 16 outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The act occurs during the child's minority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (b) the child is under 16; and

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in sexual activity with a child under 16 outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual activity (other than sexual intercourse) with another person (the child); and (b) the child is under 16; and (c) the sexual activity is engaged in outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires imprisonment for 15 years as punishment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
premise text: (Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the presence of a child to be punished.
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
premise text: (Causing child to engage in sexual activity in presence of defendant)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The act continues until the child reaches majority.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (c) the sexual activity is engaged in outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Engaging in conduct that causes a child to engage in non-consensual sexual activity outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-cogai-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct and sexual activity.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of entities involved in conduct and sexual activity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct causing non-consensual sexual activity outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Mapping of ontology concepts to conduct and sexual activity data.
modality: N3Logic
operator: Ontology mapping
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of schema against conduct and sexual activity data.
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Intention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Fault element classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Paragraph (2)(b)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(3) Section 272

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability is a deontic obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(4) Section 272

272(5) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Defence to prosecution for offence against subsections (1) or (2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(5) Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Aggravated offence: engaging in sexual intercourse with child outside Australia
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Aggravated offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in sexual intercourse with child outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 272(1)(a)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
has part: 272(5) Section 272
has part: 272(6) Section 272
has part: 272(7) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Committing an offence against this section is prohibited for a person who commits an underlying offence against a child on 3 or more separate occasions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires at least 3 separate occasions during any period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: on 3 or more separate occasions

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence against this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combines multiple prohibitions for different underlying offences.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: No fault element for physical elements of underlying offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Avoidance of underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if (3) then not committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is true, B must be true.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if (3) then committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is false, B must be false.
modality: Deontic
operator: Not
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if (3) then committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is true, B must be true.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if (3) then committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is false, B must be false.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Not
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(3) Section 272

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: It is immaterial whether the underlying offence, or the conduct constituting the underlying offence, is the same on each occasion.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

272(5) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: No need to specify or prove exact circumstances of offence occurrences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on parties
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

272(6) Section 272
type: Concept
description: Reasonable particularity
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Charge of an offence must specify period and nature of separate offences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Charge of an offence must...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to specify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 272(6)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(6) Section 272

272(7) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Trier of fact must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that evidence establishes at least 3 separate occasions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence establishes at least 3 separate occasions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Beyond reasonable doubt
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: Trier of fact must be satisfied

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence's establishment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable doubt
modality: Epistemic
operator: ?
premise text: Trier of fact's satisfaction

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(7) Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
has part: 272(5) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Engaging in sexual intercourse with a young person under 18 and in a position of trust or authority is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual intercourse with another person (the young person); and (b) the young person is at least 16 but under 18; and (c) the person is in a position of trust or authority in relation to the young person; and (d) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Engaging in sexual intercourse with a minor outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Section 272

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Intention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Fault element classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Paragraph (2)(b)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(3) Section 272

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

272(5) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Strict liability applies to paragraphs (1)(c) and (2)(d).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Strict liability applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Engaging in sexual activity with a young person outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sexual activity with a young person outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Engaging in conduct to procure a child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct and sexual activity must occur within the same temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal overlap between conduct and sexual activity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (i) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to another person (the child); and (b) the person does so with the intention of procuring the child to engage in sexual activity...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent the conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to prevent conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct and sexual activity must occur within the same temporal interval, with the child outside Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires a recurring trace of conduct and sexual activity
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (ii) the child is outside Australia when the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability is applied.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(3) Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Making it easier to procure a child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...one or more of the following apply:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (i) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Making it easier to procure a child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to another person (the child); and (b) the person does so with the intention of making it easier to procure the child to engage in sexual activity...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...one or more of the following apply:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision does not explicitly grant permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (i) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...one or more of the following apply:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The child is someone who is under 16; or who the person believes to be under 16.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (ii) who is someone: ...or (ii) who the person believes to be under 16;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability is applied.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Prohibition on impossible sexual activity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Impossibility does not absolve
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Impossible action

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Does not matter that the child is a fictitious person represented as real.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It does not matter that the child is a fictitious person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the child is a fictitious person, then it does not matter.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The child is a fictitious person.

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Defence to prosecution for underage sexual activity if defendant believed child was at least 16.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Belief of age at least 16
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 272(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Belief of age at least 18 is a defence to prosecution for an offence against sections 272.12 or 272.13.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 272(2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Section 272

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Defence to prosecution for underage conduct
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defence to prosecution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 272(3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(3) Section 272

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Trier of fact may consider reasonableness of alleged belief in circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(4) Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Defence for prosecution of sexual intercourse with child or young person
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-18
schema version: 2

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Defence for prosecution of offence against subsection 272.9(1), 272.12(1) or 272.13(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-19
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Defines sexual intercourse
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-2
schema version: 2

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Defendant must prove marriage was valid at time of offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-20
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Marriage existed between defendant and child at time of offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of marriage overlaps with time of offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Time of marriage and time of offence

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Marriage was genuine when it was solemnised.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Defendant's claim implies a valid marriage.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Defendant claims marriage was valid.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has a legal obligation to prove marriage was valid.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 13.4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Engaging in conduct with the intention of benefiting from an offence against this Division is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of location or financial intent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Always applies
modality: Deontic
operator: always

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Section 272

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-22
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Encouraging an offence against Division 272 (excluding sections 272 and 272.20) is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Encouraging an offence is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person does so with the intention of encouraging an offence against this Division...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Encouraging an offence implies that the person intends to encourage an offence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (b) the person does so with the intention of encouraging an offence against this Division...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Subsection (1) applies to conduct engaged in within or outside Australia.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Preparing for or planning an offence against section 272.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-23
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare for or plan an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-24
schema version: 2

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Committing an offence with intention to prepare for or plan another offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to commit an offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Section 272

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Subsections (1) and (2) apply to certain conditions under which an act is done.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply:

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
modality: LTL
operator: applies
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(3) Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Court may direct witness to give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-25
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits witness to give evidence by video link.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: None

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-26
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Witness must give evidence under direction in specific locations with video facilities.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Video facilities enable communication between locations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: ...enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give evidence under direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a direction only...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Amendments relating to sexual offences against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-27
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence at a specific location
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Administration of oaths and affirmations may be done in certain ways.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-28
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to administer oaths and affirmations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Administration of oaths and affirmations is a class inclusion
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: A court may make orders for payment of expenses incurred in connection with giving evidence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-29
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates an overlap between the court's obligation and the expenses.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Prohibits causing another person to engage in sexual intercourse or other sexual activity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Other laws about foreign evidence not affected
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-30
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Belief of defendant about person's age is proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Belief overlaps with proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Belief infers proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Belief is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Belief diffuses into proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Belief until proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Evidence admissible in determining age for the purposes of this Division
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be a copy...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between documents
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: a document that is or appears to be a copy of such a record

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive processing of documents
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive processing
premise text: a document that is or appears to be an official or medical record from a country outside Australia

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as admissible evidence:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admissible evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: admissibility
premise text: The jury or court may treat...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be a copy...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of documents
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: a document that is or appears to be a copy of such a record

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace for documents
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: a document that is or appears to be an official or medical record from a country outside Australia

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Prosecutor's duty to adduce best possible evidence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...does not affect a prosecutor’s duty to do all he or she can...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Subsection (2) is related to the temporal interval of subsection (3)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...adduce the best possible evidence for determining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prosecutor has a duty to adduce best possible evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
premise text: (2) does not affect a prosecutor’s duty...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...adduce the best possible evidence for determining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prosecutor is obligated to adduce best possible evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...adduce the best possible evidence for determining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prosecutor has permission to adduce best possible evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...does not affect a prosecutor’s duty to do all he or she can...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subsection (2) is a class that excludes other kinds of evidence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...does not affect a prosecutor’s duty to do all he or she can...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Subsection (2) is related to the temporal interval of subsection (3)
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(3) Section 272

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Court must warn jury beyond reasonable doubt
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(4) Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Trier of fact must find defendant guilty of column 2 offence if satisfied beyond reasonable doubt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-32
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Trier of fact must find defendant guilty of column 2 offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Duty to report certain information
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-33
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Section 272 subsections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-34
schema version: 2

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Double jeopardy protection for convictions outside Australia
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-35
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents double conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-36
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Court must consider age and maturity when determining sentence or order for an offence against Subdivision B of this Division.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider age and maturity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Court must consider additional matters when determining child sex offence cases.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of additional matters.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relation to child sex offence cases.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_RELATED_TO
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider additional matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The court must take into account...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of consideration to related matters.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for consideration of additional matters.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-37
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: No commencement of proceedings without consent of Attorney-General for minors under 18.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18 at the time he or she allegedly engaged in the conduct constituting the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings and consent requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No commencement without consent
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to obtain consent for minors
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the defendant was under 18 at the time he or she allegedly engaged in the conduct constituting the offence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General discretion to grant consent
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18 at the time he or she allegedly engaged in the conduct constituting the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consent requirement for recurring proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Arrest before consent is given for certain offenses.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for offenses where arrest before consent is allowed overlaps with the necessary consent interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed is recognized by CogAI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrest before consent is given is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits arrest before consent is given.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed diffuses into the general concept of offenses.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offense occurs until the necessary consent is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between offenses and necessary consent.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Section 272 obligation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-38
schema version: 2

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: A person in a position of trust or authority must provide pastoral care or religious instruction to the other person.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must provide pastoral care or religious instruction to the other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide pastoral care or religious instruction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Code, a person is in a position of trust or authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must determine significant aspects of the other person's terms and conditions of employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must determine significant aspects of the other person's terms and conditions of employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (i) is an employer of the other person; or (ii) has the authority to determine...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must terminate the other person's employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must terminate the other person's employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (iii) has the authority to terminate...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Defines parent, step-parent, and grandparent relationships for the purposes of this section.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is considered the grandparent of another if they meet certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for grandparent relationships.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Section 272(2)(c)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is considered the parent of another if they meet certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between parent and child relationships in argument form.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Section 272(2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defines relationships for the purposes of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies individuals into parent, step-parent, and grandparent categories using AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: Family Law Act 1975

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is considered the parent of another if they meet certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between parent and child relationships.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Section 272(2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is considered the parent of another if they meet certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between parent and child relationships in terms of diffusion.
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: Section 272(2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Section 272

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Definition of de facto partner
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Definition of sexual intercourse
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Exemptions from sexual intercourse definition
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Defines vagina for the purposes of section 272
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific parts of a female person's genitalia
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclassifies 'part of a female person’s genitalia'
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-6
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Reference to an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a reference to: (i) an offence against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) a reference to an offence against this Division, or against that provision of it...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a reference to: (i) an offence against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) a reference to an offence against this Division, or against that provision of it...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: No reference to an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it includes a reference due to section 11.2 (complicity and common purpose).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Who can be prosecuted for an offence committed outside Australia
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prosecution and offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of prosecution and offence
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence for each instance.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prosecute within Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person must be an Australian citizen, resident, or incorporated body corporate primarily in Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prosecution and offence
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence for each instance.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of prosecution and offence
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence for each instance.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272 Section 272

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: No exclusion of other laws
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding other laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

272 Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-9
schema version: 2

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Engaging in sexual intercourse with a child under 16 outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to acts performed outside Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (c) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The act is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual intercourse with another person (the child); and (b) the child is under 16; and (c) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The act is prohibited and punishable by imprisonment for 20 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reiterates the prohibition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (Penalty: Imprisonment for 20 years.)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to acts with a recurring trace of being performed outside Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace for the prohibition.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (c) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Section 272

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Engaging in conduct in relation to another person constitutes an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty imposed by law
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Section 272

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms for the section
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
has part: 273(3) Section 273
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273
schema version: 2

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-10
schema version: 2

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 if the conduct is of public benefit.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a person's conduct is of public benefit, they are not criminally responsible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Conduct is of public benefit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person's conduct is of public benefit if and only if they are not criminally responsible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Iff
premise text: Conduct is of public benefit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a person's conduct is not of public benefit, they are criminally responsible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Conduct is not of public benefit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person's conduct is not of public benefit if and only if they are criminally responsible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Iff
premise text: Conduct is not of public benefit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Section 273

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Conduct is of public benefit if necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between necessity and public benefit
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), conduct is of public benefit if, and only if, the conduct is necessary for or of assistance in: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, or a foreign country; or (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory or a foreign country; or (c) the administration of justice (whether within or outside Australia);

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Necessity as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
premise text: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, or a foreign country.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in monitoring compliance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Necessity as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
premise text: (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, or a foreign country.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in administering justice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Necessity as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
premise text: (c) the administration of justice (whether within or outside Australia).

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Court may direct witness to give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits witness to give evidence by video link
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Court may direct witness to give evidence by video link

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-12
schema version: 2

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Witness must give evidence under direction in specific locations with video facilities.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
modality: CogAI
operator: MEETS
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting (the Australian location); and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give evidence under direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a direction only...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
modality: Diffusion
operator: MEETS
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Section 273

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Court considers persons appropriate for a specific purpose.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Persons considered appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines suitability
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: Court decision

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suitable individuals identified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies suitable individuals
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is
premise text: Appropriate persons definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(2) Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-13
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies to the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The section applies to the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS-Before
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give evidence at a specific location
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies to laws about witnesses
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The section applies to laws relating to evidence, procedure, contempt of court and perjury
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES-TO
premise text: This section has effect for example

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section describes the location where evidence must be given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The section contains a description of the location where evidence must be given
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Administration of oaths and affirmations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to administer oaths and affirmations
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Is defined by the court's administration of oaths and affirmations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isDefinedBy

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Court may order payment of expenses incurred in connection with giving evidence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: No effect on other laws about foreign evidence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-16
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Who can be prosecuted for an offence committed outside Australia
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between Australia and the offence location
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The person must have been in Australia at the time of the offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution is only allowed within these boundaries.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of jurisdictional boundaries
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The law recognizes jurisdictional boundaries between Australia and other jurisdictions.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prosecute within Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person must be an Australian citizen, resident, or incorporated body corporate.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, prosecution within Australia is still required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prosecution to other jurisdictions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Prosecution may be allowed in other jurisdictions if the offence was committed outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of prosecution within Australia
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The person must be prosecuted within a reasonable time after the offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-3
schema version: 2

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: No commencement of proceedings without consent of Attorney-General for minors under 18.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Section 273

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Arrest before consent is given for certain offenses.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for offenses where consent is not required overlaps with this class.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognizes that arrest before consent is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the prohibition on arrest before consent in AI systems.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrest before consent is given is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits arrest before consent is given.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of this concept applies to all offenses where consent is not required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the concept of arrest before consent to related offenses.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrest occurs until consent is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between arrest and consent.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Double jeopardy protection for convictions outside Australia
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents double conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Saving of other laws
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-5
schema version: 2

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-6
schema version: 2

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Possession or control of child pornography material outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and a penalty of imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation of conduct outside Australia
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Outside
premise text: (c) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs outside Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is prohibited by law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Conduct implies prohibition
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) the person:...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and a penalty of imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial agent recognition
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognition
premise text: A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person:...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and a penalty of imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Material transmission is prohibited
modality: Diffusion
operator: Transmission
premise text: (ii) produces, distributes or obtains material;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Section 273

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)(c)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (2)

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-7
schema version: 2

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Possession or control of child abuse material outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs outside Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits possession or control of child abuse material outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person: (i) has possession or control of material; or (ii) produces, distributes or obtains material; or (iii) facilitates the production or distribution of material;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Section 273

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)(c)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(2) Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
has part: 273(3) Section 273
has part: 273(4) Section 273
has part: 273(5) Section 273
has part: 273(6) Section 273
has part: 273(7) Section 273
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8
schema version: 2

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Possessing child pornography material outside Australia is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Both prohibitions overlap.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The prohibition on possessing child pornography material outside Australia overlaps with the prohibition on possessing child abuse material outside Australia.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (i) section 273.5 (possessing etc. child pornography material outside Australia); and

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Possessing child pornography material outside Australia is recognized as a prohibited act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The system recognizes possessing child pornography material outside Australia as a prohibited act.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence against this section...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 25 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits possessing child pornography material outside Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence against this section...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition spreads to other prohibitions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The prohibition on possessing child pornography material outside Australia spreads to other prohibitions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (b) the commission of each such offence involves 2 or more people.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition repeats every 3 times it is committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The prohibition on possessing child pornography material outside Australia repeats every time it is committed.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) the person commits an offence against either of the following provisions on 3 or more separate occasions:

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Section 273

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: No fault element for physical elements other than those described in section 273.5 or 273.6.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

273(3) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Avoidance of offence for defence purposes
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from offence
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: defence to that offence

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(3) Section 273

273(4) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Double jeopardy is immaterial whether the offence or conduct constituting the offence is the same on each occasion.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Overlaps ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: States that double jeopardy overlaps with the same offence and conduct being present
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Recognizes ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: States that double jeopardy is recognized when the same offence and conduct are present
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Implies ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies that double jeopardy is immaterial
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Diffuses ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: States that double jeopardy diffuses to the same offence and conduct being present
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Until ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) ≠ (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: States that double jeopardy is immaterial until the same offence and conduct are not present
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

273(5) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Prohibition on reconviction for aggravated offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reconviction of aggravated offence within same temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for reconviction of aggravated offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No reconviction for aggravated offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents reconviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No reconviction for aggravated offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prevents reconviction for aggravated offence
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(5) Section 273

273(6) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 273.8.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

273(7) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Prohibition on reoffending after conviction for certain child sex offences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of same offence again
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on reoffending
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Conviction for certain child sex offences

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(7) Section 273

273 Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Alternative verdict if aggravated offence not proven
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Section 273

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Definition of child abuse material and child pornography material.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Same meaning as in Part 10.6
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Section 273

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having control of material held in a computer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal inclusion relation for Allen intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (c) having control of material held in a computer that is in the possession of another person (whether inside or outside Australia);

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inclusion relation for CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (a) having possession of a computer or data storage device that holds or contains the material; or (b) having possession of a document in which the material is recorded;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation for obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) having possession of a computer or data storage device that holds or contains the material; or (b) having possession of a document in which the material is recorded;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Inclusion relation for descriptive logic
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) having possession of a computer or data storage device that holds or contains the material; or (b) having possession of a document in which the material is recorded;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having control of material held in a computer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion relation for diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (c) having control of material held in a computer that is in the possession of another person (whether inside or outside Australia);

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having control of material held in a computer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal inclusion relation for LTL
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (c) having control of material held in a computer that is in the possession of another person (whether inside or outside Australia);

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(2) Section 273

273(3) Section 273
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Reference to a person producing, distributing or obtaining material includes a reference to the person producing, distributing or obtaining material held or contained in a computer or data storage device; or producing, distributing or obtaining a document in which the material is recorded.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Section 273

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(3) Section 273

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 After section 474.24 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

29 After section 474.25 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Insertion of new section regarding sexual activity with minors using carriage services
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits use of carriage service involving sexual activity with person under 16
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

3 Paragraph 102.1(1A)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Omit specified phrase from section.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 30(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 30(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 Paragraph 474.26(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Omit “, or submit to,”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to,’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Reasonable conduct is a defense to the offense.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: reasonable conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (2)(d)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

30(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is not criminally responsible
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from criminal responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The person is acting in the course of their duties

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has permission to act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to act in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The conduct of the person is reasonable in the circumstances for the purpose of performing that duty

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is exempt from criminal responsibility
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from criminal responsibility due to official duties
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The person is a law enforcement officer or intelligence officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has permission to act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to act in certain circumstances due to official duties
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The person is an officer or employee of the government of a foreign country performing similar duties to an intelligence or security officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is exempt from criminal responsibility
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from criminal responsibility due to official duties and reasonable conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The person is acting in the course of their duties and the conduct is reasonable

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

30(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Exempts from criminal responsibility for assisting in detecting prohibited content or manufacturing content filtering technology.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exemptions and criminal responsibility.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation of exemptions and criminal responsibility.
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeGraph

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to engage in conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of exemption for detecting prohibited content.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of exemption conditions.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates

31 Paragraph 474.26(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Omit specific phrase from Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sexual activity with another person
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

32 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Paragraph 474.26(2)(d) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Modify reference to participant in Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Change reference to participant
modality: Deontic
operator: Modify

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

33 Paragraph 474.26(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Omit ‘, or submit to’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Subparagraph 474.26(3)(e)(ii) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Insertion of '(the participant)' after 'person'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of '(the participant)', a new obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Subparagraph 474.26(3)(e)(ii) of the Criminal Code

35 Paragraph 474.27(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 36(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 Paragraph 474.27(1)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit “, or submit to,”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to,’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

36(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if committing the offence is impossible.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

36(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: No attempt to commit an offence is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

37 Paragraph 474.27(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 38(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 38(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 Paragraph 474.27(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit specified language from Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sexual activity with another person
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

38(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if committing the offence is impossible.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

38(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: No attempt to commit an offence is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attempt implies no offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Attempt to commit an offence.

39 Paragraph 474.27(2)(e) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit specific phrase from Criminal Code section
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 After Division 271 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Insert provision after Division 271 of the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Prohibition on certain actions for the offence against section 471.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Paragraph 474.27(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals the specified paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

41 Paragraph 474.27(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit “, or submit to,”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to,’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Sending or receiving child pornography is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

42 Subparagraph 474.27(3)(f)(ii) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Insertion of '(the participant)' after 'person'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending or receiving child pornography.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

43 Subsections 474.27(4) and (5) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

44 After section 474.27 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
schema version: 2

44(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Participant must be at least 18 for absolute liability to apply.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant must be at least 18.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Belief of age is proof in absence of evidence to the contrary
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Belief implies proof
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
description: Evidence of participant's age
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Participant's age must be at least 18 or over for certain sections to apply.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Participant's age overlaps with the condition for certain sections to apply.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Participant's age is recognized as relevant for certain sections to apply.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is at least 18 or over.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant's age is a condition for certain sections to apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Participant's age diffuses into the condition for certain sections to apply.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range repeatedly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Participant's age is recurrently related to the condition for certain sections to apply.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Evidence admissibility for age determination in court
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence admissibility permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits evidence admissibility
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court may treat certain evidence as admissible

44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Prosecutor's duty to adduce best possible evidence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prosecutor has a duty to adduce the best possible evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Evidence must be of the highest quality
modality: Epistemic
operator: Best Evidence

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
description: Evidence may be treated as admissible
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Court must inform jury of the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must warn the jury
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform jury
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

45 Subsection 474.28(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Absolute liability applies for certain age-related issues
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 Subsection 474.28(1) of the Criminal Code

46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Trier of fact may take into account whether belief is reasonable in circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

46 Subsection 474.28(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Insert a specific subsection number before another subsection number.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a subsection number is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

47 Subsection 474.28(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit specific reference
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit specific reference
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

470 Section 470
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-470-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-470
schema version: 2

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471
schema version: 2

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: If, on a trial for an offence (the aggravated offence) against subsection 471.22(1), the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence; but is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an offence (the underlying offence) against section 471.16.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for 'guilty'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference for 'guilty'
modality: Argumentation
operator: =>
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic for 'guilty'
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Defendant may be found guilty of underlying offence if procedural fairness is accorded.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Sending explicit sexual content to minors is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit sexual content to minors.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient); and (b) the sender does this with the intention of procuring the recipient to engage in sexual activity with the sender; and (c) the recipient is someone who is, or who the sender believes to be, under 16; and (d) the sender is at least 18.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Sending explicit child content via postal service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit child content.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies imprisonment for 15 years if sending explicit child content is prohibited.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(2) Section 471

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Sending explicit child sexual content via postal service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to acts committed after the commencement of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is applicable to AI systems that facilitate child sexual content transmission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the AI-powered nature of the law.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sender commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit child sexual content.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law implies that the sender will face penalties for violating it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Entails the logical consequences of the law.
modality: N3Logic
operator: Entail
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is structured to prevent child sexual content transmission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates the structure of the law.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(3) Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Sending unsolicited sexual material to minors is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited sexual material to minors.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient); and (b) the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure the recipient to engage in sexual activity with the sender; and (c) the recipient is someone who is, or who the sender believes to be, under 16; and (d) the sender is at least 18.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Sending explicit child sexual content via postal service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit child sexual content.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(2) Section 471

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Sending explicit sexual content via postal service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sender commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit sexual content via postal service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recipient is committing an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the recipient from engaging in sexual activity with another person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The other person is committing an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the other person from engaging in sexual activity with the recipient.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sender intends to facilitate sexual activity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that the sender's intention is to make it easier for the recipient to engage in sexual activity.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(3) Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Sending indecent material to minors is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sender must be at least 18 years old.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with the age of majority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (d) the sender is at least 18.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognizes the sender's intent to commit a crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the sender's intent to commit a crime.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (c) the recipient is someone who is, or who the sender believes to be, under 16;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sender commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending indecent material to minors.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient); and (b) the article is, or contains, material that is indecent;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Postal services must prevent the spread of indecent material.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to postal services.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient);

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system validates the sender's age.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates the sender's information.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (d) the sender is at least 18.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Trier of fact decides material is indecent in prosecution
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(2) Section 471

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Defines indecent as indecent according to ordinary people's standards.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Absolute liability applies to physical element of circumstance under 16 for offences against this Subdivision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Prohibition of certain sexual activities
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids certain sexual activities
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: No attempt is not an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (No attempt is not an offence).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If attempting is not an offence, then no attempt is not an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (Attempt not offence)

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: No attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25 is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between section 471(3) and other sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes section 471(3) as a valid exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25 is an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of section 471(3) through other sections
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal repetition of section 471(3)
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-17
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Defence to prosecution for underage recipient
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defence to prosecution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure recipient is at least 16
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 471(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Defence to prosecution for an offence against subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: defence
premise text: (2) It is a defence...

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Defendant bears legal burden if participant is under 18.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-18
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has a legal obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must believe participant is under 18.
modality: Epistemic
operator: belief

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Geographical jurisdiction applies to an offence against Subdivision B or C of this Division.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-19
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to an offence against Subdivision B or C of this Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Possessing, controlling, producing, supplying or obtaining child pornography material for use through a postal or similar service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Definition of carry by post does not apply to Subdivision B or C.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-20
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.16 or 471.17 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct must be of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not be criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.16 or 471.17 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.16 (using a postal or similar service for child pornography material) or 471.17 (possessing etc. child pornography material for use through a postal or similar service)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Conduct is of public benefit if necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law, monitoring compliance, administering justice, or approved research.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or investigating a contravention of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Monitoring compliance interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: monitoring compliance with
premise text: (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct is necessary for or of assistance in...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Necessary condition for public benefit conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), conduct is of public benefit if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Administering justice condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: administering justice
premise text: (c) the administration of justice;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Enforcing a law interval.
modality: LTL
operator: enforcing a law
premise text: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Law enforcement and intelligence officers are not criminally responsible for certain offenses if their conduct is reasonable in the circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an officer's conduct is reasonable, they are not criminally responsible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Officer's conduct is reasonable.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Criminally responsible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an officer's conduct is unreasonable, they are criminally responsible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Officer's conduct is unreasonable.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(3) Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-4
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Causing child abuse material to be carried by postal service is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrying child abuse material by postal service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Requesting to carry child abuse material is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval of the offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines the condition under which the offence occurs.
modality: CogAI
operator: If
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits requesting to carry child abuse material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines the condition under which the offence occurs.
modality: Diffusion
operator: If
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(2) Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Possessing, controlling, producing, supplying or obtaining child abuse material for use through a postal or similar service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471 Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.19 or 471.20 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct overlaps with the public benefit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conduct overlaps with public benefit
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) is of public benefit; and (b) does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is not criminally responsible for the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not be criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.19 or 471.20 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.19 (using a postal or similar service for child abuse material) or 471.20 (possessing etc. child abuse material for use through a postal or similar service) because of engaging in particular conduct if the conduct: (a) is of public benefit; and (b) does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must determine whether the conduct is of public benefit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine whether conduct is of public benefit
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: In determining whether the person is, under this subsection, not criminally responsible for the offence, the question whether the conduct is of public benefit is a question of fact and the person’s motives in engaging in the conduct are irrelevant.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant must bear the evidential burden.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to bear evidential burden
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in this subsection, see subsection 13.3(3).

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is recurring if it extends beyond the public benefit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conduct is recurring if it extends beyond public benefit
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (b) does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Conduct is of public benefit if necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law, monitoring compliance, administering justice, or approved research.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or investigating a contravention of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Monitoring compliance interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: monitoring compliance with
premise text: (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct is necessary for or of assistance in...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Necessary condition for public benefit conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), conduct is of public benefit if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Administering justice condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: administering justice
premise text: (c) the administration of justice;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Enforcing a law interval.
modality: LTL
operator: enforcing a law
premise text: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Law enforcement and intelligence officers are not criminally responsible for certain offenses if their conduct is reasonable in the circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not justified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The officer's conduct overlaps with their duty in the circumstances.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Officer's conduct does not overlap with their duty.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an officer is acting in the course of their duties, then they are not criminally responsible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Officer is acting in the course of their duties.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not justified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The officer's conduct must be reasonable in the circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Justified
premise text: Officer's conduct is not reasonable.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(3) Section 471

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-7
schema version: 2

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.43
note: Committing an offence against this section multiple times with others involved.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence against this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.43
note: No fault element for physical elements other than specified
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(3) Section 471
has part: 471(4) Section 471
has part: 471(5) Section 471
has part: 471(6) Section 471
has part: 471(7) Section 471
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8
schema version: 2

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Defence to an offence against certain sections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No prosecution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Defence to an offence

471(4) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Double jeopardy is immaterial whether the offence or conduct constituting the offence is the same on each occasion.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Implies ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies that double jeopardy is immaterial
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)) Implies (double jeopardy etc.)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

471(5) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Prevents reconviction for aggravated offence in relation to conduct constituting it.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to temporal overlap between aggravated offence and other offences.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relates to recognition of aggravated offence by AI system.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents reconviction for aggravated offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relates to spreading of aggravated offence across other offences.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Relates to repetition of aggravated offence in other offences.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(5) Section 471

471(6) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 471.23.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (6)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: (5)

471(7) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Prohibition on conviction of certain offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids conviction of certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (underlying offence) against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or

471 Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: No conviction for an offence against this section in relation to the underlying offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conviction for an offence against this section in relation to the underlying offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited during the period of carrying by a postal or similar service.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies carrying child pornography material as prohibited using artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrying child pornography material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited through postal or similar services.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited until it is no longer being carried by a postal or similar service.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Section 471

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Requesting to carry child pornography material is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Section 471

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for requesting to carry child pornography material.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of prohibited content.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting to carry child pornography material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition on requesting to carry child pornography material.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of requesting to carry child pornography material.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(2) Section 471

473 Section 473
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Exemptions from liability for carriage service use
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-473
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from liability for carriage service use
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 473 Section 473

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
curation status: Proposed
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474
schema version: 2

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Using a carriage service to transmit indecent communication to person under 16 years of age is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474 Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Someone under 16 years of age is a recipient.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Someone under 16 years of age is a recipient.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of recipient
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Recipient is defined as someone under 16 years of age.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474 Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Substitute 'the participant' in certain provisions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-12
schema version: 2

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-13
schema version: 2

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Belief of age is a defence to prosecution for an offence against section 474.25A.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Belief of age is a defence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 474.25A

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Belief is a defence, not a duty or right
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Section 474(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(1) Section 474

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Defence to prosecution for an offence against subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Defendant bears legal burden in relation to subsection matter.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears legal burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant's belief is relevant to the matter.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474 Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-15
schema version: 2

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Defence for prosecution of child sex offence involving belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-16
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant's belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment occurred before the commission of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between defendant's belief and commission of offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Section 474(4)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment is a defence to prosecution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 474(4)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant's burden
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 13.4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment is a permission for the defendant to commit the offence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence as permission to commit offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Section 474(4)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant's belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment is part of a recurring trace with the commission of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of defendant's belief and commission of offence
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Section 474(4)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474 Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 474(5) Section 474
has part: 474(6) Section 474
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-17
schema version: 2

474(5) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Defence to prosecution for underage recipient
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must prove belief in recipient's age
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Defendant bears a legal burden

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(5) Section 474

474(6) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Triers of fact may consider the reasonableness of an alleged belief in determining whether a defendant had such a belief.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(6) Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Prohibition on certain offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-18
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 474(3) Section 474
has part: 474(4) Section 474
has part: 474(5) Section 474
has part: 474(6) Section 474
has part: 474(7) Section 474
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2
schema version: 2

474(3) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Avoidance of offence for defence purposes
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence or conduct need not be the same
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to avoid offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(3) Section 474

474(4) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Double jeopardy is immaterial whether the offence or conduct constituting the offence is the same on each occasion.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Overlaps ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with 'Same Occasion'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Recognized ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes double jeopardy as immaterial
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Implies ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies that double jeopardy is immaterial
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Diffuses ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses to 'Same Occasion'
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Eventually ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Eventually implies double jeopardy is immaterial
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)

474(5) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Prevents reconviction of certain offences in relation to aggravated offence conduct.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No reconviction of related offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents reconviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Aggravated offence conviction

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(5) Section 474

474(6) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 474.24B.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (6)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: (5)

474(7) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Prohibition on certain convictions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conviction during specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (underlying offence) against section 474.19, 474.20, 474.22 or

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids conviction for certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (underlying offence) against section 474.19, 474.20, 474.22 or

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: No conviction for conduct constituting underlying offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474 Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: If, on a trial for an offence (the aggravated offence) against subsection 474.24A(1), the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence;
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-4
schema version: 2

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Procedural fairness is required for a finding of guilt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide procedural fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474 Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-6
schema version: 2

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: No commencement of proceedings without consent of Attorney-General for minors under 18.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consent period overlaps with proceedings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings and consent period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Proceedings commence after consent

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings not commenced
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No commencement without consent
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Attorney-General's consent required

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(1) Section 474

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Consent required before arresting or charging for certain offenses.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may overlap with the time when necessary consent is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may overlap with the time when necessary consent is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consent required before arresting or charging.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: State must give consent.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may diffuse to the time when necessary consent is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may overlap with the time when necessary consent is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(2) Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
has part: 474(3) Section 474
has part: 474(4) Section 474
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7
schema version: 2

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Engaging in sexual activity with a child under 16 using a carriage service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is at least 18 years of age and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the person's actions and the child's age.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (c) the person is at least 18 years of age;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of sexual activity with a child under 16 using a carriage service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual activity with another person (the child) using a carriage service;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of sexual activity with a child under 16.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the person is at least 18 years of age;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(1) Section 474

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Engaging in conduct with a child using a carriage service is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct with a child using a carriage service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person (the defendant) commits an offence if: (a) the defendant engages in conduct in relation to another person (the child); and (b) that conduct causes the child to engage in sexual activity with another person (the participant) using a carriage service; and (c) the child is under 16 years of age when the sexual activity is engaged in; and (d) the participant is at least 18 years of age when the sexual activity is engaged in.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(2) Section 474

474(3) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Intention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Fault element is specified
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2)(b)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(3) Section 474

474(4) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Defence to prosecution for offence against subsections (1) or (2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) It is a defence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(4) Section 474

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Aggravated offence: child with mental impairment or under care, supervision or authority of defendant
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in sexual activity with child using a carriage service or causing child to engage in sexual activity with another person
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 474(1)(a)

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474 Section 474

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Committing an offence against this section is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence against this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(1) Section 474

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: No fault element for physical elements other than those described in section 474.19.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Section 474

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No fault element for physical elements other than those described in section 474.19.
modality: Deontic
operator: no-fault-element
premise text: (2) There is no fault element...

475 Section 475
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 475(1) Section 475
has part: 475(2) Section 475
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-475
schema version: 2

475 Section 475
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 475(1) Section 475
has part: 475(2) Section 475
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-2
schema version: 2

475(1) Section 475
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Presumption of carriage service use in offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 475 Section 475

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relation between physical element of offence and carriage service use
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) If: (a) a physical element of an offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474 consists of a person using a carriage service to engage in particular conduct;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then it is presumed, unless the person proves to the contrary, that the person used a carriage service to engage in that conduct.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presumption of carriage service use
modality: Deontic
operator: Presumption
premise text: (a) a physical element of an offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474 consists of a person using a carriage service to engage in particular conduct;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability applies to physical element of offence that carriage service was used
modality: Deontic
operator: Absolute liability
premise text: Absolute liability applies to physical element of offence that carriage service was used

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears legal burden in relation to matter in subsection
modality: Deontic
operator: Burden of proof
premise text: Note: A defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection, see section 13.4.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of carriage service use in offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) If: (a) a physical element of an offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474 consists of a person using a carriage service to engage in particular conduct;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 475(1) Section 475

475(2) Section 475
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Absolute liability applies to the physical element of the offence that a carriage service was used to engage in that particular conduct.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 475 Section 475

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the carriage service and the particular conduct.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents knowledge about the carriage service and particular conduct.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then absolute liability applies...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a carriage service to engage in particular conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Establishes a diffusive relation between the carriage service and the particular conduct.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive relation
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of carriage service use and particular conduct.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;

475(1) Section 475
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Good faith exemption for employees of NRS providers from certain offences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 475 Section 475

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal responsibility
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Good faith exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Employee is acting in good faith

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 475(1) Section 475

475(2) Section 475
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Good faith exemption from criminal liability for emergency call persons
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 475 Section 475

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Good faith exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Emergency call person in good faith

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 475(2) Section 475

48 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

48 Subsection 474.28(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit certain sections of the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain sections of the Criminal Code
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Subsection 474.28(3) of the Criminal Code

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

49 Subsection 474.28(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit sections 474.26 and 474.27, evidence that the other person referred to in paragraph 474.26(2)(b) or (3)(e) or 474.27(2)(c) or (3)(f)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of omitting sections
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit

5 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Defines 'cause a person to engage in sexual intercourse or other sexual activity'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Dictionary in the Criminal Code

50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Guilty of an offence against section 474.19 beyond reasonable doubt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

50 Subsection 474.28(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Replace 'other person' with 'participant' in subsection 474.28(4) of the Criminal Code.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace 'other person' with 'participant'
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

51 Subsection 474.28(5) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Substitute text in subsection 474.28(5)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 52(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 52(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 Subsection 474.28(7) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Substitute a provision of this Subdivision
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

52(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Avoids doubt about committing an offence with a defence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

52(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
description: Evidence
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: If not satisfied of guilt, must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: EVIDENCE
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Bayesian inference for guilt determination
modality: Epistemic
operator: BAYESIAN

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

53 After subsection 474.28(7) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: No fault element for physical element of circumstance that child has a mental impairment or defendant is in a position of trust or authority.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the physical element of circumstance that child has a mental impairment or defendant is in a position of trust or authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 54(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

54 Subsection 474.28(9) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Substitute subsections in Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-2
schema version: 2

54(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution occurs during the trier of fact's determination
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Allen interval: during prosecution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Argument for prosecution's material indecency is determined by the trier of fact
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Argumentation: determining argument
modality: Argumentation
operator: determines
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cognitive AI's determination is influenced by the trier of fact's decision
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI: determining cogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: determines
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to determine
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determining obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution is in the trier of fact's determination of material's indecency
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion: in prosecution
modality: Diffusion
operator: in
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution

54(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Defines indecent as indecent according to ordinary people's standards.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to the definition of indecent.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to

55 Subsection 474.28(11) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal subsection 474.28(11) of the Criminal Code.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Defence based on belief that child did not have a mental impairment
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

56 Section 474.29 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-2
schema version: 2

57 After section 474.29 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Insert: Offences relating to use of carriage service for suicide-related material
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits use of carriage service for suicide-related material
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

58 Section 474.30 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal section 474.30 of the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

58 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

59 Before section 475.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Amendments relating to sexual offences against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

6 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: A person is taken to engage in sexual activity if they are present with another person engaging in sexual activity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Dictionary in the Criminal Code

60 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.63
note: Defines 'make available' in relation to material
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: make available, in relation to material
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Insert:

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Dictionary in the Criminal Code

61 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Inserts an offence against Subdivision B or C of Division 471, or D or F of Division 474, of the Criminal Code.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts an obligation into the law.
modality: Deontic
operator: inserts

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of serious

62 Paragraph 15GE(2)(v)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'child sex tourism' and substitute with a sexual offence against a person under 18 outside Australia.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Prohibition on using video link evidence in certain child sex offence cases outside Australia.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits child sex tourism
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

63 Subsection 15GE(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with new serious Commonwealth offence provisions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of specific offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

64 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Amendments apply in relation to a controlled operation authorized on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

65 Paragraph 15Y(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

66 After paragraph 15Y(1)(caa)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: List of offences against specific divisions of the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

67 Paragraph 15Y(1)(ca)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Repeal certain offences and substitute with new ones.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

68 Paragraph 15Y(1)(e)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Omit certain paragraphs and substitute with others.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

69 Paragraph 15Y(1)(f)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Omit specific paragraphs and substitute with preceding ones.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

7 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Defines mental impairment
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

70 Section 15YT
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Sections 15Y and 15YT of the Crimes Act 1914 continue to apply in relation to an offence against Part IIIA.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues to apply despite amendments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71 Application

72 Subparagraph 30(1)(a)(iii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Repeal a subparagraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

73 Subparagraph 30(1)(a)(viii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Omit or substitute specific section numbers.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

74 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Continues to apply certain provisions despite amendment.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subparagraph 30(1)(a)(iii) of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation continues
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: amendment made by item 72

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Application

75 Subsection 5D(2A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

76 Subparagraph 5D(3)(d)(xi)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Omit specific phrase from section
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

77 Subsection 5D(3B)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with new provisions related to sexual offences against children.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of certain conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

78 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Applicability of subsection 5D(3B) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...subsection 5D(3B) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, as in force on and after the commencement of this item, applies...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply subsection 5D(3B)
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (1) Subject to subitems (2) and (3), subsection 5D(3B) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, as in force on and after the commencement of this item, applies...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78 Application

8 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Defines position of trust or authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Prohibits procuring a person to engage in sexual activity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the act
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines procurement of sexual activity
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Dictionary in the Criminal Code

1 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Defines child abuse material
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: child abuse material has the same meaning as in Part 10.6 of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 3(1)

2 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Defines child pornography material
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: child pornography material has the same meaning as in Part 10.6 of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 3(1)

23ZA Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Application of Part to forfeitable thing
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23za
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part applies to a thing
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZA Application

23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(7) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb
schema version: 2

23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Constable must give forfeiture notice if reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Between giving forfeiture notice and the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving forfeiture notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: This section applies if a constable reasonably believes that the forfeitable thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must give forfeiture notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give forfeiture notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Between giving forfeiture notice and the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving forfeiture notice
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: This section applies if a constable reasonably believes that the forfeitable thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Notice must be given to the owner of the forfeitable thing or the person possessing it.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who owns the forfeitable thing or the person possessing it must receive the notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice must be given
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATION
premise text: The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Forfeiture notice must be given to certain persons before the thing is forfeited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timeframe for providing written notice.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (d) explains the circumstances in which, under section 23ZC, a person may be given a copy of parts of the thing, or of data contained in the thing, on request to the head of the police force made within 30 days after the notice is given;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of possession or use of the thing.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requirement to provide written notice before forfeiture.
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (c) states that the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object to the forfeiture by written notice given before ComLaw Authoritative Act C2010A00042

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of possession or use of the thing.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (a) identifies the forfeitable thing; and (b) states the constable’s belief that the thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of persons affected by the forfeiture notice.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (a) identifies the forfeitable thing; and (b) states the constable’s belief that the thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence;

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of persons affected by the forfeiture notice.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (c) states that the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object to the forfeiture by written notice given before ComLaw Authoritative Act C2010A00042

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Giving forfeiture notice to anyone directly or indirectly affected by the proposed forfeiture.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Forfeiture of material by operation of law at the end of a period
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to forfeit material
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Head of police force must instruct Director to apply for forfeiture order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Head of police force must instruct Director to apply for forfeiture order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Legal Person
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: State is a LegalPerson

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(7) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Forfeiture of material by operation of law
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forfeiture of material
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc
schema version: 2

23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Head of police force must comply with request if reasonably practicable.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request is made

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance allowed if practicable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Practicability condition for compliance
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLY PRACTICABLE
premise text: Request is made

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
description: No
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Exemption from providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No provision required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits providing copies of innocuous parts under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Reasonable belief in endangering safety or prejudicing investigation or prosecution.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Justification for exemption.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Head of police force has reasonable belief in conditions.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: Reasonable belief in endangering safety or prejudicing investigation or prosecution.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption only applicable during that time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Condition applies to temporal interval of request.
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
premise text: Request made within certain time frame.

23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Pay costs incurred by police force in complying with request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Pay costs incurred by police force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd
schema version: 2

23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
note: Forfeiture of material by court order on application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application

23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
note: Notice to be given to claimants and affected parties
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
note: Court may make interim orders on application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make interim orders
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application

23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
note: Forfeiture of material by court order on application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forfeiture of material by court order on application
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application

23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze
schema version: 2

23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: This section applies if a thing is forfeited to the Commonwealth under this Part.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: A thing is forfeited to the Commonwealth under this Part.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: The thing forfeited becomes the property of the Commonwealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it becomes the property of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to transfer ownership
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
premise text: (2) When the thing is forfeited

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Seizure of thing without warrant
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seizure of thing without warrant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A constable may, without warrant, seize the thing.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Commissioner's discretion to deal with forfeited thing
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Police head may deal with seized thing in any way they consider appropriate
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between police custody and action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Police action as process on thing
modality: CogAI
operator: Process
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deal with thing
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Police action influences thing's fate
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of police action on thing
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) continue to have effect
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues the effect of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (6) Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) are prohibited
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues the prohibition of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (6) Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.

23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(4) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf
schema version: 2

23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has obligation to compensate
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (1) This section applies to a person...

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Commonwealth liable to pay compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Liability for compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

23ZF(4) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Court must determine compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZF(4) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

23ZG Delegation by head of police force
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Head of police force may delegate powers to a constable.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zg
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZG Delegation by head of police force

3 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Defines Commonwealth child sex offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applies to offences committed before the commencement of Part IE
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific provisions of the Criminal Code
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Is a subclass of offences against certain other provisions in force before the commencement of Part IE
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 3(1)

4 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Data includes information in any form and any program (or part of a program).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Subsection 3(1)

474 Section 474
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Offences against certain sections of the Criminal Code are prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-474-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-474-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-474
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-474-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =

5 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Defines data storage device
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 3C(1) (definition of data)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Repeal the definition of data
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Prohibits possession of child abuse material or child pornography material.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z to 2010-12-31T23:59:59Z
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of prohibited items.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines the scope of prohibited items in terms of AI systems.
modality: CogAI
operator: for

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits possession of child abuse material or child pornography material.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to all media.
modality: Diffusion
operator: throughout

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to all locations.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Admissible evidence in Commonwealth child sex offence prosecution
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The evidence is admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

7 Subsection 3C(1) (definition of data storage device)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Repeal definition of data storage device
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 70(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
schema version: 2

70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: The court may order the Commonwealth to pay compensation to a person who owns or has property in electronic equipment if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The conditions must be met during the hearing of the application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court has an obligation to order compensation if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

70(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Standard of proof for subsections (1) and (5)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes standard of proof
modality: Deontic
operator: standard

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.

72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Forfeiture of property for Commonwealth child sex offence convictions or findings in civil proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the forfeiture of property for specified convictions or findings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8 After Part ID
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Application of Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914 applies to Commonwealth child sex offences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914 applies to Commonwealth child sex offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Application of Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Cites this Act as the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Table of sections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the citation of this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable

12 May 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

14 April 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

15 April 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement rules
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1, effective one day after Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 2 commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedules for amendments and repeals of Acts
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the criminal law, and for related purposes
identifier: No. 42 of 2010
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU