Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 42 of 2010
description: An Act to amend the criminal law, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Cites this Act as the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Establishes the citation of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Table of sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-1-2-norm

14 April 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-14-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Schedule 1, effective one day after Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-2-2-norm

15 April 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-15-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Schedule 2 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-3-norm

12 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-12-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Schedules for amendments and repeals of Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sec-3-2-norm

1 Part IIIA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Repeal Part IIIA of the Criminal Code Act 1995
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Part IIIA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal Part IIIA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 7.3(8) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Omit “section”, substitute “Code”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm

3 Paragraph 102.1(1A)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Omit specified phrase from section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 After Division 271 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Insert provision after Division 271 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272
note: Definition of 'cause a person to engage in sexual intercourse or other sexual activity'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms for the section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-2
note: Defines sexual intercourse
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-2-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-3
note: Prohibits causing another person to engage in sexual intercourse or other sexual activity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: A person in a position of trust or authority must provide pastoral care or religious instruction to the other person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide pastoral care or religious instruction.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Code, a person is in a position of trust or authority...
conclusion text: The person must provide pastoral care or religious instruction to the other person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must determine significant aspects of the other person's terms and conditions of employment.
premise text: (i) is an employer of the other person; or (ii) has the authority to determine...
conclusion text: The person must determine significant aspects of the other person's terms and conditions of employment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must terminate the other person's employment.
premise text: (iii) has the authority to terminate...
conclusion text: The person must terminate the other person's employment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Defines parent, step-parent, and grandparent relationships for the purposes of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between parent and child relationships.
premise text: Section 272(2)
conclusion text: A person is considered the parent of another if they meet certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for grandparent relationships.
premise text: Section 272(2)(c)
conclusion text: A person is considered the grandparent of another if they meet certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between parent and child relationships in argument form.
premise text: Section 272(2)
conclusion text: A person is considered the parent of another if they meet certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a logical connection between parent and child relationships in terms of diffusion.
premise text: Section 272(2)
conclusion text: A person is considered the parent of another if they meet certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies individuals into parent, step-parent, and grandparent categories using AI.
premise text: Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: Defines relationships for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Definition of de facto partner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Definition of sexual intercourse
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-1-norm

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Exemptions from sexual intercourse definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-2-norm

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Defines vagina for the purposes of section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific parts of a female person's genitalia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-5-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclassifies 'part of a female person’s genitalia'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-6
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Reference to an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
premise text: (a) a reference to: (i) an offence against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
premise text: (a) a reference to: (i) an offence against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
premise text: (b) a reference to an offence against this Division, or against that provision of it...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it
premise text: (b) a reference to an offence against this Division, or against that provision of it...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: No reference to an offence against this Division or a particular provision of it includes a reference due to section 11.2 (complicity and common purpose).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-6-ss-2-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
has part: 11(3) Section 11
has part: 11(4) Section 11
has part: 11(5) Section 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10

11(3) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-ss-3
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Exemptions from attempt offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain offences from attempt liability
premise text: (3) Section 11.1 (attempt) does not apply to an offence against: (a) section 272.14 (procuring child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia); or (b) section 272.15 (“grooming” child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia); or (c) section 272.20 (preparing for or planning offence against this Division).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(4) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-ss-4
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Section 11.4 (incitement) does not apply to an offence against this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-4-norm

11(5) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-ss-5
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Section 11.5 does not apply to an offence against section 272.19.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(5) Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section 11.5 implies that section 272.19 is not affected.
premise text: Section 11.5
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is not affected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Section 11.5 exempts section 272.19 from its application.
premise text: Section 11.5
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is exempted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Section 11.5 implies that section 272.19 is not affected by its application.
premise text: Section 11.5
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is not affected by its application.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section 11.5 overlaps with section 272.19 in terms of applicability.
premise text: Section 11.5
conclusion text: Section 272.19 overlaps with Section 11.5.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Section 11.5 diffuses the applicability of section 272.19.
premise text: Section 11.5
conclusion text: Section 272.19 is diffused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-7
note: Who can be prosecuted for an offence committed outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prosecute within Australia
premise text: The person must be an Australian citizen, resident, or incorporated body corporate primarily in Australia.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prosecution and offence
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of prosecution and offence
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence for each instance.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of prosecution and offence
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence for each instance.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of prosecution and offence
premise text: The person must be present in Australia at the time of the offence for each instance.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-8
note: No exclusion of other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluding other laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-9
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in sexual intercourse with a child under 16 outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the act.
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual intercourse with another person (the child); and (b) the child is under 16; and (c) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.
conclusion text: The act is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: (c) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to acts performed outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace for the prohibition.
premise text: (c) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to acts with a recurring trace of being performed outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Reiterates the prohibition.
premise text: (Penalty: Imprisonment for 20 years.)
conclusion text: The act is prohibited and punishable by imprisonment for 20 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in conduct in relation to another person constitutes an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Duty imposed by law
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
has part: 272(5) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in sexual activity with a child under 16 outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in sexual activity with a child under 16 outside Australia.
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual activity (other than sexual intercourse) with another person (the child); and (b) the child is under 16; and (c) the sexual activity is engaged in outside Australia.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The act occurs during the child's minority.
premise text: (b) the child is under 16; and
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The act continues until the child reaches majority.
premise text: (c) the sexual activity is engaged in outside Australia.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: Requires imprisonment for 15 years as punishment.
premise text: (Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.)
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: Requires the presence of a child to be punished.
premise text: (Causing child to engage in sexual activity in presence of defendant)
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in conduct that causes a child to engage in non-consensual sexual activity outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-cogai-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct causing non-consensual sexual activity outside Australia.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct and sexual activity.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
logic summary: Recognition of entities involved in conduct and sexual activity.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
logic summary: Validation of schema against conduct and sexual activity data.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Ontology mapping
logic summary: Mapping of ontology concepts to conduct and sexual activity data.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(3) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element classification
premise text: Paragraph (2)(b)
conclusion text: Intention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(4) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability is a deontic obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(5) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Defence to prosecution for offence against subsections (1) or (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(5) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-11
note: Aggravated offence: engaging in sexual intercourse with child outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in sexual intercourse with child outside Australia
premise text: Section 272(1)(a)
conclusion text: Aggravated offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
has part: 10(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 10(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14

10(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: No fault element for physical element of underlying offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: no-fault-element
logic summary: No fault element for physical element of underlying offence
premise text: (2) There is no fault element...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-3
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Avoidance of underlying offence commitment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion from committing the underlying offence
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commitment and defence
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between commitment and defence
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
logic summary: Defence as a condition for avoiding commitment
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Defence implies avoidance of commitment
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-4
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Absolute liability applies to subparagraph (1)(b)(i).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-5
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Prohibition on strict liability for subparagraph (1)(b)(ii)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-5-norm

10(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-6
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears a legal burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant must believe the child did not have a mental impairment.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Condition applies to specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-ss-7
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Triers of fact may consider the reasonableness of an alleged belief in determining whether a defendant had such a belief.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-7-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
has part: 272(5) Section 272
has part: 272(6) Section 272
has part: 272(7) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Committing an offence against this section is prohibited for a person who commits an underlying offence against a child on 3 or more separate occasions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence against this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
logic summary: Combines multiple prohibitions for different underlying offences.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Requires at least 3 separate occasions during any period.
premise text: on 3 or more separate occasions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: No fault element for physical elements of underlying offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Avoidance of underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence if the person has a defence to the underlying offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(3) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is true, B must be true.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: if (3) then not committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Not
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is false, B must be false.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: if (3) then committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Not
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is false, B must be false.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: if (3) then committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A implies B, then if A is true, B must be true.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit the underlying offence for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: if (3) then committing the underlying offence for purposes of subsection (1) is not a defence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-4
part of: 272 Section 272
note: It is immaterial whether the underlying offence, or the conduct constituting the underlying offence, is the same on each occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-4-norm

272(5) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5
part of: 272 Section 272
note: No need to specify or prove exact circumstances of offence occurrences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(6) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Charge of an offence must specify period and nature of separate offences.
description: Reasonable particularity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(6) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify
premise text: Section 272(6)
conclusion text: Charge of an offence must...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(7) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Trier of fact must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that evidence establishes at least 3 separate occasions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(7) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Beyond reasonable doubt
premise text: Trier of fact must be satisfied
conclusion text: Evidence establishes at least 3 separate occasions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-12-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: ?
logic summary: Reasonable doubt
premise text: Trier of fact's satisfaction
conclusion text: Evidence's establishment
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
has part: 12(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 12(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 12(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 12(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16

12(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-8
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Judge must warn jury of subsection (7) requirements in proceedings for an offence against this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to warn jury
premise text: Judge must warn jury
conclusion text: of the requirements of subsection (7)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Warning is a temporal interval contained within proceedings under this section
premise text: Proceedings for an offence against this section
conclusion text: (if any) of the requirements of subsection (7)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Warning implies that the judge has a duty to inform the jury
premise text: Judge must warn jury
conclusion text: of the requirements of subsection (7)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-9
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Prohibition on reconviction for related offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits reconviction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-10
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 272.28.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes subsection (9) from preventing alternative verdicts.
premise text: (10)
conclusion text: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 272.28.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Subsection (10) overlaps with section 272.28.
premise text: (9)
conclusion text: Subsection (10) and section 272.28 overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-10-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Section 272.28 repeats subsection (10).
premise text: (9)
conclusion text: Section 272.28 is identical to subsection (10).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-11
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Prohibition on re-conviction of certain sex crimes against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on re-conviction
premise text: Convicted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of sex crimes against children
premise text: Offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10
conclusion text: Prohibition on re-conviction
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of temporal overlap
premise text: Convicted or acquitted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section at the same time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on re-conviction over time
premise text: Convicted or acquitted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section in the future
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-ss-11-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on re-conviction
premise text: Convicted or acquitted of an offence against section 272.8, 272.9 or 272.10
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
has part: 272(5) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in sexual intercourse with a young person under 18 and in a position of trust or authority is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual intercourse with another person (the young person); and (b) the young person is at least 16 but under 18; and (c) the person is in a position of trust or authority in relation to the young person; and (d) the sexual intercourse is engaged in outside Australia.
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in sexual intercourse with a minor outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(3) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element classification
premise text: Paragraph (2)(b)
conclusion text: Intention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(5) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Strict liability applies to paragraphs (1)(c) and (2)(d).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Strict liability applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-14
note: Engaging in sexual activity with a young person outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sexual activity with a young person outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
has part: 14(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 14(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18

14(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Engaging in conduct that causes a young person to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct causing sexual activity outside Australia.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 7 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b) of section 14(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element is specified
conclusion text: Intention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-4
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-5
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Strict liability for certain crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-6
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Defence to prosecution for an offence against subsections (1) or (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
premise text: (6) It is a defence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in conduct to procure a child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to another person (the child); and (b) the person does so with the intention of procuring the child to engage in sexual activity...
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Requires temporal overlap between conduct and sexual activity
premise text: (i) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia;
conclusion text: The conduct and sexual activity must occur within the same temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Requires a recurring trace of conduct and sexual activity
premise text: (ii) the child is outside Australia when the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs;
conclusion text: The conduct and sexual activity must occur within the same temporal interval, with the child outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to prevent conduct
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent the conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability is applied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(3) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Does not matter that child is a fictitious person for purposes of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Making it easier to procure a child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Making it easier to procure a child to engage in sexual activity outside Australia is prohibited.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to another person (the child); and (b) the person does so with the intention of making it easier to procure the child to engage in sexual activity...
conclusion text: ...is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia.
premise text: (i) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia;
conclusion text: ...one or more of the following apply:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The child is someone who is under 16; or who the person believes to be under 16.
premise text: (ii) who is someone: ...or (ii) who the person believes to be under 16;
conclusion text: ...one or more of the following apply:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The provision does not explicitly grant permission.
premise text: (i) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia;
conclusion text: ...one or more of the following apply:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability is applied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Prohibition on impossible sexual activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Impossibility does not absolve
premise text: Impossible action
conclusion text: Prohibition applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Does not matter that the child is a fictitious person represented as real.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the child is a fictitious person, then it does not matter.
premise text: The child is a fictitious person.
conclusion text: It does not matter that the child is a fictitious person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Defence to prosecution for underage sexual activity if defendant believed child was at least 16.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
premise text: Section 272(1)
conclusion text: Belief of age at least 16
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Belief of age at least 18 is a defence to prosecution for an offence against sections 272.12 or 272.13.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
premise text: Section 272(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Defence to prosecution for underage conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(3) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal obligation
premise text: Section 272(3)
conclusion text: Defence to prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-4
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Trier of fact may consider reasonableness of alleged belief in circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(4) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-18
note: Defence for prosecution of sexual intercourse with child or young person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-18-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-19
note: Defence for prosecution of offence against subsection 272.9(1), 272.12(1) or 272.13(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-19-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-20
note: Defendant must prove marriage was valid at time of offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-argumentation-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has a legal obligation to prove marriage was valid.
premise text: Section 13.4
conclusion text: Defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of marriage overlaps with time of offence.
premise text: Time of marriage and time of offence
conclusion text: Marriage existed between defendant and child at time of offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-20-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Defendant's claim implies a valid marriage.
premise text: Defendant claims marriage was valid.
conclusion text: Marriage was genuine when it was solemnised.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in conduct with the intention of benefiting from an offence against this Division is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of location or financial intent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: always
logic summary: Always applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-22
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Encouraging an offence against Division 272 (excluding sections 272 and 272.20) is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Encouraging an offence is an obligation.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the person does so with the intention of encouraging an offence against this Division...
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Encouraging an offence implies that the person intends to encourage an offence.
premise text: (b) the person does so with the intention of encouraging an offence against this Division...
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Subsection (1) applies to conduct engaged in within or outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-22-ss-2-norm

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
has part: 20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24

20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-ss-3
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-ss-4
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Encouraging or aiding a child sexual offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits encouraging or aiding a child sexual offence
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
conclusion text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) not encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) not aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits aiding or facilitating a child sexual offence
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
conclusion text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) not aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies 'encourage' as a child sexual offence action
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
conclusion text: (4) In this section, 'encourage' means an action that aids or facilitates a child sexual offence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
conclusion text: (4) In this section, the obligation applies to actions taken after commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Defines the scope of the obligation as a recurring action
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
conclusion text: (4) In this section, the obligation applies to recurring actions that aid or facilitate a child sexual offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits aiding or facilitating a child sexual offence
premise text: (4) In this section, encourage means: (a) encourage, incite to, or urge, by any means whatever, (including by a written, electronic or other form of communication); or (b) aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
conclusion text: (4) In this section, not aid, facilitate, or contribute to, in any way whatever.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-23
note: Preparing for or planning an offence against section 272.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prepare for or plan an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-24
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Committing an offence with intention to prepare for or plan another offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to commit an offence
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Subsections (1) and (2) apply to certain conditions under which an act is done.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(3) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions.
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified conditions under which an act is done, regardless of time.
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply: (a) whether the act is done within or outside Australia;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-25
note: Court may direct witness to give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits witness to give evidence by video link.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-26
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Witness must give evidence under direction in specific locations with video facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to give evidence under direction
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a direction only...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Video facilities enable communication between locations
premise text: ...enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Amendments relating to sexual offences against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-26-ss-2-norm

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Definition of 'appropriate persons' for court consideration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-27
note: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence at a specific location
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-28
note: Administration of oaths and affirmations may be done in certain ways.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to administer oaths and affirmations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-28-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Administration of oaths and affirmations is a class inclusion
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-29
note: A court may make orders for payment of expenses incurred in connection with giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-29-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates an overlap between the court's obligation and the expenses.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-30
note: Other laws about foreign evidence not affected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-30-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Belief of defendant about person's age is proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Belief is an obligation.
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Belief overlaps with proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Belief until proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Belief diffuses into proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Belief infers proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
premise text: Defendant believed person was under or of a particular age.
conclusion text: Proof in absence of evidence to the contrary.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Evidence admissible in determining age for the purposes of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admissibility
logic summary: Admissible evidence
premise text: The jury or court may treat...
conclusion text: ...as admissible evidence:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between documents
premise text: a document that is or appears to be a copy of such a record
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be a copy...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Ordered trace for documents
premise text: a document that is or appears to be an official or medical record from a country outside Australia
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of documents
premise text: a document that is or appears to be a copy of such a record
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be a copy...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive processing
logic summary: Cognitive processing of documents
premise text: a document that is or appears to be an official or medical record from a country outside Australia
conclusion text: ...is or appears to be...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Prosecutor's duty to adduce best possible evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(3) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
logic summary: Prosecutor has a duty to adduce best possible evidence
premise text: (2) does not affect a prosecutor’s duty...
conclusion text: ...adduce the best possible evidence for determining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Prosecutor is obligated to adduce best possible evidence
premise text: (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...
conclusion text: ...adduce the best possible evidence for determining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Subsection (2) is a class that excludes other kinds of evidence
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...
conclusion text: ...does not affect a prosecutor’s duty to do all he or she can...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Subsection (2) is related to the temporal interval of subsection (3)
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...
conclusion text: ...does not affect a prosecutor’s duty to do all he or she can...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Subsection (2) is related to the temporal interval of subsection (3)
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...
conclusion text: ...does not affect a prosecutor’s duty to do all he or she can...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Prosecutor has permission to adduce best possible evidence
premise text: (2) does not make any other kind of evidence inadmissible...
conclusion text: ...adduce the best possible evidence for determining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Court must warn jury beyond reasonable doubt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(4) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-32
note: Trier of fact must find defendant guilty of column 2 offence if satisfied beyond reasonable doubt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Trier of fact must find defendant guilty of column 2 offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Alternative verdicts for certain subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits alternative verdicts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-33
note: Duty to report certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-34
note: Section 272 subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-34-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-35
note: Double jeopardy protection for convictions outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents double conviction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-36
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Court must consider age and maturity when determining sentence or order for an offence against Subdivision B of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must consider age and maturity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Court must consider additional matters when determining child sex offence cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider additional matters.
premise text: The court must take into account...
conclusion text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of additional matters.
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Recurring trace for consideration of additional matters.
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Diffusion of consideration to related matters.
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_RELATED_TO
logic summary: Relation to child sex offence cases.
premise text: ...the matters mentioned in subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...(for example, the matters mentioned in subsection 16A(2) of the Crimes Act 1914).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-37
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: No commencement of proceedings without consent of Attorney-General for minors under 18.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No commencement without consent
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to obtain consent for minors
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings and consent requirement
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18 at the time he or she allegedly engaged in the conduct constituting the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Consent requirement for recurring proceedings
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...
conclusion text: ...without the consent of the Attorney-General if the defendant was under 18 at the time he or she allegedly engaged in the conduct constituting the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Attorney-General discretion to grant consent
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against this Division must not be commenced...
conclusion text: ...if the defendant was under 18 at the time he or she allegedly engaged in the conduct constituting the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Arrest before consent is given for certain offenses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits arrest before consent is given.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: Arrest before consent is given is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for offenses where arrest before consent is allowed overlaps with the necessary consent interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between offenses and necessary consent.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: The offense occurs until the necessary consent is given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: The concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed diffuses into the general concept of offenses.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: The concept of offenses where arrest before consent is allowed is recognized by CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
has part: 273(3) Section 273
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-ss-1
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Definition of child abuse material and child pornography material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: Same meaning as in Part 10.6
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-ss-2
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(2) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation for obligations
premise text: (a) having possession of a computer or data storage device that holds or contains the material; or (b) having possession of a document in which the material is recorded;
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation for descriptive logic
premise text: (a) having possession of a computer or data storage device that holds or contains the material; or (b) having possession of a document in which the material is recorded;
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal inclusion relation for Allen intervals
premise text: (c) having control of material held in a computer that is in the possession of another person (whether inside or outside Australia);
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having control of material held in a computer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal inclusion relation for LTL
premise text: (c) having control of material held in a computer that is in the possession of another person (whether inside or outside Australia);
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having control of material held in a computer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Diffusion relation for diffusion
premise text: (c) having control of material held in a computer that is in the possession of another person (whether inside or outside Australia);
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having control of material held in a computer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation for CogAI
premise text: (a) having possession of a computer or data storage device that holds or contains the material; or (b) having possession of a document in which the material is recorded;
conclusion text: A reference to a person having possession or control of material includes a reference to the person having possession of a computer or data storage device, document, or control of material held in a computer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(3) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-ss-3
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Reference to a person producing, distributing or obtaining material includes a reference to the person producing, distributing or obtaining material held or contained in a computer or data storage device; or producing, distributing or obtaining a document in which the material is recorded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-3-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(3) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Reference to Part 10.6 in Section 473.4 is redirected to this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Redirects
logic summary: Redirects reference to Part 10.6
premise text: Section 473.4
conclusion text: This Division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-2
note: Who can be prosecuted for an offence committed outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prosecute within Australia
premise text: The person must be an Australian citizen, resident, or incorporated body corporate.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between Australia and the offence location
premise text: The person must have been in Australia at the time of the offence.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of prosecution within Australia
premise text: The person must be prosecuted within a reasonable time after the offence.
conclusion text: If not, prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of prosecution to other jurisdictions
premise text: Prosecution may be allowed in other jurisdictions if the offence was committed outside Australia.
conclusion text: However, prosecution within Australia is still required.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of jurisdictional boundaries
premise text: The law recognizes jurisdictional boundaries between Australia and other jurisdictions.
conclusion text: Prosecution is only allowed within these boundaries.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-3
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1
part of: 273 Section 273
note: No commencement of proceedings without consent of Attorney-General for minors under 18.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Arrest before consent is given for certain offenses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits arrest before consent is given.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: Arrest before consent is given is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for offenses where arrest before consent is allowed.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for offenses where consent is not required overlaps with this class.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between arrest and consent.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: Arrest occurs until consent is given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the concept of arrest before consent to related offenses.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: The diffusion of this concept applies to all offenses where consent is not required.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the prohibition on arrest before consent in AI systems.
premise text: (2) However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in connection with, such an offence before the necessary consent has been given.
conclusion text: The system recognizes that arrest before consent is prohibited.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-4
note: Double jeopardy protection for convictions outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents double conviction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-5
note: Saving of other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-5-norm

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-6
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Possession or control of child pornography material outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person:...
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Outside
logic summary: Temporal relation of conduct outside Australia
premise text: (c) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs outside Australia.
conclusion text: ...and a penalty of imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Conduct implies prohibition
premise text: (a) the person:...
conclusion text: ...is prohibited by law.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Transmission
logic summary: Material transmission is prohibited
premise text: (ii) produces, distributes or obtains material;
conclusion text: ...and a penalty of imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognition
logic summary: Artificial agent recognition
premise text: A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and a penalty of imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (1)(c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-7
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Possession or control of child abuse material outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits possession or control of child abuse material outside Australia.
premise text: (a) the person: (i) has possession or control of material; or (ii) produces, distributes or obtains material; or (iii) facilitates the production or distribution of material;
conclusion text: The conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(2) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (1)(c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
has part: 273(3) Section 273
has part: 273(4) Section 273
has part: 273(5) Section 273
has part: 273(6) Section 273
has part: 273(7) Section 273
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Possessing child pornography material outside Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits possessing child pornography material outside Australia.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence against this section...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 25 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The prohibition on possessing child pornography material outside Australia overlaps with the prohibition on possessing child abuse material outside Australia.
premise text: (i) section 273.5 (possessing etc. child pornography material outside Australia); and
conclusion text: Both prohibitions overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The prohibition on possessing child pornography material outside Australia repeats every time it is committed.
premise text: (a) the person commits an offence against either of the following provisions on 3 or more separate occasions:
conclusion text: The prohibition repeats every 3 times it is committed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: The prohibition on possessing child pornography material outside Australia spreads to other prohibitions.
premise text: (b) the commission of each such offence involves 2 or more people.
conclusion text: The prohibition spreads to other prohibitions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The system recognizes possessing child pornography material outside Australia as a prohibited act.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence against this section...
conclusion text: Possessing child pornography material outside Australia is recognized as a prohibited act.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-2
part of: 273 Section 273
note: No fault element for physical elements other than those described in section 273.5 or 273.6.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-2-norm

273(3) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Avoidance of offence for defence purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(3) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from offence
premise text: defence to that offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(4) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Double jeopardy is immaterial whether the offence or conduct constituting the offence is the same on each occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implies that double jeopardy is immaterial
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Implies ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: States that double jeopardy is immaterial until the same offence and conduct are not present
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Until ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) ≠ (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: States that double jeopardy overlaps with the same offence and conduct being present
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Overlaps ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: States that double jeopardy diffuses to the same offence and conduct being present
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Diffuses ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: States that double jeopardy is recognized when the same offence and conduct are present
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Recognizes ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

273(5) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Prohibition on reconviction for aggravated offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(5) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents reconviction
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: No reconviction for aggravated offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents reconviction for aggravated offence
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: No reconviction for aggravated offence
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for reconviction of aggravated offence
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: Reconviction of aggravated offence within same temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(6) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-6
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 273.8.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-6-norm

273(7) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Prohibition on reoffending after conviction for certain child sex offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(7) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on reoffending
premise text: Conviction for certain child sex offences
conclusion text: Cannot be convicted of same offence again
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-9
note: Alternative verdict if aggravated offence not proven
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-9-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-10
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1
part of: 273 Section 273
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 if the conduct is of public benefit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a person's conduct is of public benefit, they are not criminally responsible.
premise text: Conduct is of public benefit
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Iff
logic summary: A person's conduct is of public benefit if and only if they are not criminally responsible.
premise text: Conduct is of public benefit
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a person's conduct is not of public benefit, they are criminally responsible.
premise text: Conduct is not of public benefit
conclusion text: Criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Iff
logic summary: A person's conduct is not of public benefit if and only if they are criminally responsible.
premise text: Conduct is not of public benefit
conclusion text: Criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Conduct is of public benefit if necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
logic summary: Necessity as an obligation
premise text: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, or a foreign country.
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
logic summary: Necessity as an obligation
premise text: (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, or a foreign country.
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in monitoring compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
logic summary: Necessity as an obligation
premise text: (c) the administration of justice (whether within or outside Australia).
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in administering justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation between necessity and public benefit
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), conduct is of public benefit if, and only if, the conduct is necessary for or of assistance in: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, or a foreign country; or (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory or a foreign country; or (c) the administration of justice (whether within or outside Australia);
conclusion text: The conduct is necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
has part: 30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 30(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 30(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34

30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-ss-3
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Reasonable conduct is a defense to the offense.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (2)(d)
conclusion text: reasonable conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-ss-4
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 273.5 or 273.6 if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from criminal responsibility
premise text: The person is acting in the course of their duties
conclusion text: The person is not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to act in certain circumstances
premise text: The conduct of the person is reasonable in the circumstances for the purpose of performing that duty
conclusion text: The person has permission to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from criminal responsibility due to official duties
premise text: The person is a law enforcement officer or intelligence officer
conclusion text: The person is exempt from criminal responsibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to act in certain circumstances due to official duties
premise text: The person is an officer or employee of the government of a foreign country performing similar duties to an intelligence or security officer
conclusion text: The person has permission to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from criminal responsibility due to official duties and reasonable conduct
premise text: The person is acting in the course of their duties and the conduct is reasonable
conclusion text: The person is exempt from criminal responsibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-ss-5
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Exempts from criminal responsibility for assisting in detecting prohibited content or manufacturing content filtering technology.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to engage in conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exemptions and criminal responsibility.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace of exemption for detecting prohibited content.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeGraph
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation of exemptions and criminal responsibility.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: Validation of exemption conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-11
note: Court may direct witness to give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits witness to give evidence by video link
premise text: Court may direct witness to give evidence by video link
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-12
has part: 273(1) Section 273
has part: 273(2) Section 273
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35

273(1) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Witness must give evidence under direction in specific locations with video facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to give evidence under direction
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a direction only...
conclusion text: ...if the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting (the Australian location); and...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between locations with video facilities
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the Australian location to see and hear the witness give the evidence; and...
conclusion text: ...and enable appropriate persons at the overseas location to see and hear appropriate persons at the Australian location.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2
part of: 273 Section 273
note: Court considers persons appropriate for a specific purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(2) Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Determines suitability
premise text: Court decision
conclusion text: Persons considered appropriate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-12-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies suitable individuals
premise text: Appropriate persons definition
conclusion text: Suitable individuals identified
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-13
note: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-diffusion-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give evidence at a specific location
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS-Before
logic summary: The section applies to the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: The section applies to the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The section contains a description of the location where evidence must be given
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The section describes the location where evidence must be given
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-13-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES-TO
logic summary: The section applies to laws relating to evidence, procedure, contempt of court and perjury
premise text: This section has effect for example
conclusion text: The section applies to laws about witnesses
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-14
note: Administration of oaths and affirmations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to administer oaths and affirmations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isDefinedBy
logic summary: Is defined by the court's administration of oaths and affirmations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-15
note: Court may order payment of expenses incurred in connection with giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Section 273
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 273
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273-16
note: No effect on other laws about foreign evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-16-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-273-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Section 273
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Defines 'cause a person to engage in sexual intercourse or other sexual activity'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: A person is taken to engage in sexual activity if they are present with another person engaging in sexual activity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Defines mental impairment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-norm

8 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Defines position of trust or authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272-38
note: Section 272 obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-272-38-norm

9 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Prohibits procuring a person to engage in sexual activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Defines procurement of sexual activity
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
note: Defines sexual activity for the purpose of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Establishes a definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies concepts into categories.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-2
note: Defines sexual intercourse as per section 272.4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-norm

12 At the end of Division 470 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm

470 Section 470
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-470
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-470-norm

13 Before section 471.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Insert: Subdivision A—General postal offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-norm

14 At the end of Division 471 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
note: Offences relating to use of postal or similar service for child pornography material or child abuse material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of postal or similar service for child pornography material or child abuse material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrying child pornography material.
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited during the period of carrying by a postal or similar service.
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited until it is no longer being carried by a postal or similar service.
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Carrying child pornography material is prohibited through postal or similar services.
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies carrying child pornography material as prohibited using artificial intelligence.
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Requesting to carry child pornography material is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(2) Section 471
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting to carry child pornography material.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for requesting to carry child pornography material.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of requesting to carry child pornography material.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition on requesting to carry child pornography material.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of prohibited content.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and the article is, or contains, child pornography material.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-2
note: Possessing, controlling, producing, supplying or obtaining child pornography material for use through a postal or similar service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
has part: 36(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 36(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40

36(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if committing the offence is impossible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

36(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-3
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: No attempt to commit an offence is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.16 or 471.17 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not be criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.16 or 471.17 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
premise text: (1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.16 (using a postal or similar service for child pornography material) or 471.17 (possessing etc. child pornography material for use through a postal or similar service)
conclusion text: The conduct must be of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Conduct is of public benefit if necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law, monitoring compliance, administering justice, or approved research.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
logic summary: Necessary condition for public benefit conduct.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), conduct is of public benefit if...
conclusion text: ...the conduct is necessary for or of assistance in...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: monitoring compliance with
logic summary: Monitoring compliance interval.
premise text: (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
conclusion text: ...or investigating a contravention of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: enforcing a law
logic summary: Enforcing a law interval.
premise text: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: administering justice
logic summary: Administering justice condition.
premise text: (c) the administration of justice;
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Law enforcement and intelligence officers are not criminally responsible for certain offenses if their conduct is reasonable in the circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(3) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an officer's conduct is reasonable, they are not criminally responsible.
premise text: Officer's conduct is reasonable.
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an officer's conduct is unreasonable, they are criminally responsible.
premise text: Officer's conduct is unreasonable.
conclusion text: Criminally responsible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-4
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Causing child abuse material to be carried by postal service is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits carrying child abuse material by postal service.
premise text: (a) the person causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Requesting to carry child abuse material is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(2) Section 471
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits requesting to carry child abuse material.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval of the offence.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the offence.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: If
logic summary: Defines the condition under which the offence occurs.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: If
logic summary: Defines the condition under which the offence occurs.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
conclusion text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person requests another person to cause an article to be carried by a postal or similar service; and (b) the article is, or contains, child abuse material. Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-5
note: Possessing, controlling, producing, supplying or obtaining child abuse material for use through a postal or similar service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
has part: 38(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 38(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42

38(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-2
part of: 38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if committing the offence is impossible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

38(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-3
part of: 38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: No attempt to commit an offence is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Attempt implies no offence.
premise text: Attempt to commit an offence.
conclusion text: No offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.19 or 471.20 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not be criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.19 or 471.20 if the conduct is of public benefit and does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
premise text: (1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 471.19 (using a postal or similar service for child abuse material) or 471.20 (possessing etc. child abuse material for use through a postal or similar service) because of engaging in particular conduct if the conduct: (a) is of public benefit; and (b) does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
conclusion text: The person is not criminally responsible for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Conduct overlaps with public benefit
premise text: (a) is of public benefit; and (b) does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
conclusion text: The conduct overlaps with the public benefit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Conduct is recurring if it extends beyond public benefit
premise text: (b) does not extend beyond what is of public benefit.
conclusion text: The conduct is recurring if it extends beyond the public benefit.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to determine whether conduct is of public benefit
premise text: In determining whether the person is, under this subsection, not criminally responsible for the offence, the question whether the conduct is of public benefit is a question of fact and the person’s motives in engaging in the conduct are irrelevant.
conclusion text: The person must determine whether the conduct is of public benefit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to bear evidential burden
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in this subsection, see subsection 13.3(3).
conclusion text: The defendant must bear the evidential burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Conduct is of public benefit if necessary for or of assistance in enforcing a law, monitoring compliance, administering justice, or approved research.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary
logic summary: Necessary condition for public benefit conduct.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), conduct is of public benefit if...
conclusion text: ...the conduct is necessary for or of assistance in...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: monitoring compliance with
logic summary: Monitoring compliance interval.
premise text: (b) monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
conclusion text: ...or investigating a contravention of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: enforcing a law
logic summary: Enforcing a law interval.
premise text: (a) enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: administering justice
logic summary: Administering justice condition.
premise text: (c) the administration of justice;
conclusion text: ...or of assistance in...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Law enforcement and intelligence officers are not criminally responsible for certain offenses if their conduct is reasonable in the circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(3) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an officer is acting in the course of their duties, then they are not criminally responsible.
premise text: Officer is acting in the course of their duties.
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justified
logic summary: The officer's conduct must be reasonable in the circumstances.
premise text: Officer's conduct is not reasonable.
conclusion text: Not justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The officer's conduct overlaps with their duty in the circumstances.
premise text: Officer's conduct does not overlap with their duty.
conclusion text: Not justified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-7
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.43

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Committing an offence against this section multiple times with others involved.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence against this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: No fault element for physical elements other than specified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Prohibition on certain actions for the offence against section 471.16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8
has part: 471(3) Section 471
has part: 471(4) Section 471
has part: 471(5) Section 471
has part: 471(6) Section 471
has part: 471(7) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Defence to an offence against certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from prosecution
premise text: Defence to an offence
conclusion text: No prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(4) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Double jeopardy is immaterial whether the offence or conduct constituting the offence is the same on each occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implies that double jeopardy is immaterial
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Implies ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
premise text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
conclusion text: ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)) Implies (double jeopardy etc.)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
logic summary: Equivalence between double jeopardy and sameness of offence/conduct
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) = ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

471(5) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Prevents reconviction for aggravated offence in relation to conduct constituting it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(5) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents reconviction for aggravated offence.
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Relates to temporal overlap between aggravated offence and other offences.
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Relates to repetition of aggravated offence in other offences.
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Relates to spreading of aggravated offence across other offences.
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Relates to recognition of aggravated offence by AI system.
premise text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: (5) A person who has been convicted or acquitted of an offence (the aggravated offence) against this section may not be convicted of an offence against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or 471.20 in relation to the conduct that constituted the aggravated offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(6) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 471.23.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (5)
conclusion text: (6)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(7) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Prohibition on conviction of certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-8-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids conviction of certain offences
premise text: (underlying offence) against section 471.16, 471.17, 471.19 or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-9
note: No conviction for an offence against this section in relation to the underlying offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conviction for an offence against this section in relation to the underlying offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-10
note: If, on a trial for an offence (the aggravated offence) against subsection 471.22(1), the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence; but is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an offence (the underlying offence) against section 471.16.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-argumentation-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for 'guilty'
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
logic summary: Temporal logic for 'guilty'
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-10-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =>
logic summary: Inference for 'guilty'
premise text: The trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence.
conclusion text: But the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty of an underlying offence against section 471.16.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-11
note: Defendant may be found guilty of underlying offence if procedural fairness is accorded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Sending explicit sexual content to minors is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit sexual content to minors.
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient); and (b) the sender does this with the intention of procuring the recipient to engage in sexual activity with the sender; and (c) the recipient is someone who is, or who the sender believes to be, under 16; and (d) the sender is at least 18.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Sending explicit child content via postal service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(2) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit child content.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies imprisonment for 15 years if sending explicit child content is prohibited.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Sending explicit child sexual content via postal service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(3) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit child sexual content.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: The sender commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to acts committed after the commencement of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the AI-powered nature of the law.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: The law is applicable to AI systems that facilitate child sexual content transmission.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates the structure of the law.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: The law is structured to prevent child sexual content transmission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-12-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Entail
logic summary: Entails the logical consequences of the law.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: The law implies that the sender will face penalties for violating it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Sending or receiving child pornography is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending or receiving child pornography.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Sending unsolicited sexual material to minors is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited sexual material to minors.
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient); and (b) the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure the recipient to engage in sexual activity with the sender; and (c) the recipient is someone who is, or who the sender believes to be, under 16; and (d) the sender is at least 18.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Sending explicit child sexual content via postal service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(2) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit child sexual content.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Sending explicit sexual content via postal service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(3) Section 471
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending explicit sexual content via postal service.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: The sender commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the recipient from engaging in sexual activity with another person.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: The recipient is committing an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that the sender's intention is to make it easier for the recipient to engage in sexual activity.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: The sender intends to facilitate sexual activity.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the other person from engaging in sexual activity with the recipient.
premise text: (3) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: The other person is committing an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Sending indecent material to minors is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending indecent material to minors.
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient); and (b) the article is, or contains, material that is indecent;
conclusion text: The sender commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the age of majority.
premise text: (d) the sender is at least 18.
conclusion text: The sender must be at least 18 years old.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to postal services.
premise text: (a) the sender causes an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient);
conclusion text: Postal services must prevent the spread of indecent material.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the sender's intent to commit a crime.
premise text: (c) the recipient is someone who is, or who the sender believes to be, under 16;
conclusion text: The system recognizes the sender's intent to commit a crime.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates the sender's information.
premise text: (d) the sender is at least 18.
conclusion text: The system validates the sender's age.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Trier of fact decides material is indecent in prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(2) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Defines indecent as indecent according to ordinary people's standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-14-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-15
note: Absolute liability applies to physical element of circumstance under 16 for offences against this Subdivision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
has part: 44(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48

44(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Participant must be at least 18 for absolute liability to apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Participant must be at least 18.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-3
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Belief of age is proof in absence of evidence to the contrary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Belief implies proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-4
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Participant's age must be at least 18 or over for certain sections to apply.
description: Evidence of participant's age
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Participant's age is a condition for certain sections to apply.
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is at least 18 or over.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Participant's age overlaps with the condition for certain sections to apply.
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Participant's age is recurrently related to the condition for certain sections to apply.
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range repeatedly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Participant's age diffuses into the condition for certain sections to apply.
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Participant's age is recognized as relevant for certain sections to apply.
premise text: Participant was represented as being at least 18 or over.
conclusion text: Section applies if participant is within a certain age range.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-5
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Evidence admissibility for age determination in court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permits evidence admissibility
premise text: Court may treat certain evidence as admissible
conclusion text: Evidence admissibility permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-6
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Prosecutor's duty to adduce best possible evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
logic summary: Prosecutor has a duty to adduce the best possible evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Best Evidence
logic summary: Evidence must be of the highest quality
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-7
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Court must inform jury of the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.
description: Evidence may be treated as admissible
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform jury
conclusion text: Court must warn the jury
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Prohibition of certain sexual activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids certain sexual activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: No attempt is not an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If attempting is not an offence, then no attempt is not an offence.
premise text: (Attempt not offence)
conclusion text: (No attempt is not an offence).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: No attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25 is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: No attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25 is an offence.
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between section 471(3) and other sections
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Temporal repetition of section 471(3)
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of section 471(3) through other sections
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-16-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes section 471(3) as a valid exemption
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against section 471.24 or 471.25.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-17
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Defence to prosecution for underage recipient
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure recipient is at least 16
premise text: Section 471(1)
conclusion text: Defence to prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Defence to prosecution for an offence against subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defence
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
premise text: (2) It is a defence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-18
note: Defendant bears legal burden if participant is under 18.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Defendant has a legal obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-18-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: belief
logic summary: Defendant must believe participant is under 18.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Trier of fact may take into account whether belief is reasonable in circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-19
note: Geographical jurisdiction applies to an offence against Subdivision B or C of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applies to an offence against Subdivision B or C of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-471-20
note: Definition of carry by post does not apply to Subdivision B or C.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-20-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-471-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Section defines 'use' in relation to carriage services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 At the end of Division 473 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm

473 Section 473
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-473
note: Exemptions from liability for carriage service use
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 473 Section 473
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-473-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exemptions from liability for carriage service use
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subdivision C of Division 474 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Repeal and substitute heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm

18 Section 474.13 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
note: Repeal section 474.13 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm

19 After section 474.18 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Insertion of new subdivision D relating to use of carriage service for child pornography material or child abuse material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 After section 474.18 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using carriage service for child pornography material or child abuse material
premise text: State regulation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Paragraph 474.19(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
note: Accessing or transmitting material using a carriage service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Paragraph 474.19(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 474.19(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm

22 After subsection 474.19(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(aa)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 After subsection 474.19(2) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Subsection 474.20(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm

48 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Paragraph 474.22(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
note: Accessing or transmitting material using a carriage service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Paragraph 474.22(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 474.22(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-norm

26 After subsection 474.22(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraph (1)(aa)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 After subsection 474.22(2) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 474.23(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Omit “10”, substitute “15”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm

28 After section 474.24 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-ss-1
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Committing an offence against this section is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(1) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence against this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-ss-2
part of: 474 Section 474
note: No fault element for physical elements other than those described in section 474.19.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: no-fault-element
logic summary: No fault element for physical elements other than those described in section 474.19.
premise text: (2) There is no fault element...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2
has part: 474(3) Section 474
has part: 474(4) Section 474
has part: 474(5) Section 474
has part: 474(6) Section 474
has part: 474(7) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53

474(3) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Avoidance of offence for defence purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(3) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to avoid offence
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, a person does not commit an offence...
conclusion text: Offence or conduct need not be the same
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(4) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Double jeopardy is immaterial whether the offence or conduct constituting the offence is the same on each occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implies that double jeopardy is immaterial
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (double jeopardy etc.) Implies ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Overlaps with 'Same Occasion'
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Overlaps ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Eventually implies double jeopardy is immaterial
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Eventually ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses to 'Same Occasion'
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Diffuses ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes double jeopardy as immaterial
premise text: (offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion)
conclusion text: (Double Jeopardy) Recognized ((offence, or conduct constituting the offence) = (same on each occasion))
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

474(5) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Prevents reconviction of certain offences in relation to aggravated offence conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(5) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents reconviction
premise text: Aggravated offence conviction
conclusion text: No reconviction of related offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(6) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Does not prevent an alternative verdict under section 474.24B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (5)
conclusion text: (6)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(7) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Prohibition on certain convictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids conviction for certain offences
premise text: (underlying offence) against section 474.19, 474.20, 474.22 or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conviction during specified period
premise text: (underlying offence) against section 474.19, 474.20, 474.22 or
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-3
note: No conviction for conduct constituting underlying offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conviction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-4
note: If, on a trial for an offence (the aggravated offence) against subsection 474.24A(1), the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-4-norm

50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Guilty of an offence against section 474.19 beyond reasonable doubt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-5
note: Procedural fairness is required for a finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-6
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1
part of: 474 Section 474
note: No commencement of proceedings without consent of Attorney-General for minors under 18.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(1) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No commencement without consent
premise text: Attorney-General's consent required
conclusion text: Proceedings not commenced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings and consent period
premise text: Proceedings commence after consent
conclusion text: Consent period overlaps with proceedings
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Consent required before arresting or charging for certain offenses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(2) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consent required before arresting or charging.
premise text: State must give consent.
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may overlap with the time when necessary consent is given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may overlap with the time when necessary consent is given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may diffuse to the time when necessary consent is given.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Arrest can occur before necessary consent is given.
premise text: Necessary consent must be given before arresting or charging.
conclusion text: Arresting or charging without consent may overlap with the time when necessary consent is given.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 After section 474.25 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Insertion of new section regarding sexual activity with minors using carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits use of carriage service involving sexual activity with person under 16
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
has part: 474(3) Section 474
has part: 474(4) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Engaging in sexual activity with a child under 16 using a carriage service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(1) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of sexual activity with a child under 16 using a carriage service.
premise text: (a) the person engages in sexual activity with another person (the child) using a carriage service;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the person's actions and the child's age.
premise text: (c) the person is at least 18 years of age;
conclusion text: The person is at least 18 years of age and...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of sexual activity with a child under 16.
premise text: (c) the person is at least 18 years of age;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Engaging in conduct with a child using a carriage service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(2) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct with a child using a carriage service.
premise text: (2) A person (the defendant) commits an offence if: (a) the defendant engages in conduct in relation to another person (the child); and (b) that conduct causes the child to engage in sexual activity with another person (the participant) using a carriage service; and (c) the child is under 16 years of age when the sexual activity is engaged in; and (d) the participant is at least 18 years of age when the sexual activity is engaged in.
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(3) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Intention is the fault element for paragraph (2)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(3) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element is specified
premise text: (2)(b)
conclusion text: Intention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(4) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Defence to prosecution for offence against subsections (1) or (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(4) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
premise text: (4) It is a defence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-8
note: Aggravated offence: child with mental impairment or under care, supervision or authority of defendant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in sexual activity with child using a carriage service or causing child to engage in sexual activity with another person
premise text: Section 474(1)(a)
conclusion text: No
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
has part: 52(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 52(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56

52(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-2
part of: 52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Avoids doubt about committing an offence with a defence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-3
part of: 52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: If not satisfied of guilt, must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
description: Evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
conclusion text: EVIDENCE
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: BAYESIAN
logic summary: Bayesian inference for guilt determination
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-9
note: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Paragraph 474.26(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
note: Omit “, or submit to,”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to,’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Paragraph 474.26(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Omit specific phrase from Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sexual activity with another person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Paragraph 474.26(2)(d) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
note: Modify reference to participant in Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Modify
logic summary: Change reference to participant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Paragraph 474.26(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Omit ‘, or submit to’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subparagraph 474.26(3)(e)(ii) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
note: Insertion of '(the participant)' after 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Subparagraph 474.26(3)(e)(ii) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of '(the participant)', a new obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Paragraph 474.27(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm

36 Paragraph 474.27(1)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
note: Omit “, or submit to,”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to,’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Paragraph 474.27(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-norm

38 Paragraph 474.27(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
note: Omit specified language from Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sexual activity with another person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Paragraph 474.27(2)(e) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Omit specific phrase from Criminal Code section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-39-norm

40 Paragraph 474.27(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals the specified paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Paragraph 474.27(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Omit “, or submit to,”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, or submit to,’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subparagraph 474.27(3)(f)(ii) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
note: Insertion of '(the participant)' after 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm

43 Subsections 474.27(4) and (5) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm

44 After section 474.27 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-10
note: Using a carriage service to transmit indecent communication to person under 16 years of age is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
has part: 54(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 54(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58

54(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determining obligation
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution
conclusion text: Obligation to determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Allen interval: during prosecution
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution
conclusion text: Prosecution occurs during the trier of fact's determination
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: determines
logic summary: Argumentation: determining argument
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution
conclusion text: Argument for prosecution's material indecency is determined by the trier of fact
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: in
logic summary: Diffusion: in prosecution
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution
conclusion text: Prosecution is in the trier of fact's determination of material's indecency
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: determines
logic summary: CogAI: determining cogAI
premise text: Trier of fact determines material's indecency in prosecution
conclusion text: Cognitive AI's determination is influenced by the trier of fact's decision
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-3
part of: 54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Defines indecent as indecent according to ordinary people's standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to the definition of indecent.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Subsection 474.28(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Absolute liability applies for certain age-related issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Subsection 474.28(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-11
note: Someone under 16 years of age is a recipient.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of recipient
premise text: Recipient is defined as someone under 16 years of age.
conclusion text: Someone under 16 years of age is a recipient.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subsection 474.28(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
note: Insert a specific subsection number before another subsection number.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a subsection number is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Subsection 474.28(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Omit specific reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific reference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-12
note: Substitute 'the participant' in certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-12-norm

48 Subsection 474.28(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
note: Omit certain sections of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Subsection 474.28(3) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain sections of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Subsection 474.28(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Omit sections 474.26 and 474.27, evidence that the other person referred to in paragraph 474.26(2)(b) or (3)(e) or 474.27(2)(c) or (3)(f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition of omitting sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Subsection 474.28(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
note: Replace 'other person' with 'participant' in subsection 474.28(4) of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace
logic summary: Replace 'other person' with 'participant'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Subsection 474.28(5) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Substitute text in subsection 474.28(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subsection 474.28(7) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
note: Substitute a provision of this Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm

53 After subsection 474.28(7) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: No fault element for physical element of circumstance that child has a mental impairment or defendant is in a position of trust or authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the physical element of circumstance that child has a mental impairment or defendant is in a position of trust or authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Defence based on belief that child did not have a mental impairment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-norm

54 Subsection 474.28(9) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-2
note: Substitute subsections in Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm

55 Subsection 474.28(11) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Repeal subsection 474.28(11) of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-55-norm

56 Section 474.29 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-2
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-2-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-13
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Belief of age is a defence to prosecution for an offence against section 474.25A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(1) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence to prosecution
premise text: Section 474.25A
conclusion text: Belief of age is a defence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Belief is a defence, not a duty or right
premise text: Section 474(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-2
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Defence to prosecution for an offence against subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-13-ss-2-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-14
note: Defendant bears legal burden in relation to subsection matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears legal burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-14-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant's belief is relevant to the matter.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-15
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-15-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-16
note: Defence for prosecution of child sex offence involving belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
premise text: Section 474(4)
conclusion text: Belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment is a defence to prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant's burden
premise text: Section 13.4
conclusion text: A defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between defendant's belief and commission of offence
premise text: Section 474(4)
conclusion text: The defendant's belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment occurred before the commission of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of defendant's belief and commission of offence
premise text: Section 474(4)
conclusion text: The defendant's belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment is part of a recurring trace with the commission of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-16-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Defence as permission to commit offence
premise text: Section 474(4)
conclusion text: The belief that participant under 18 years of age did not have a mental impairment is a permission for the defendant to commit the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-17
has part: 474(5) Section 474
has part: 474(6) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61

474(5) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Defence to prosecution for underage recipient
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(5) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal obligation
premise text: Defendant bears a legal burden
conclusion text: Must prove belief in recipient's age
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(6) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-6
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Triers of fact may consider the reasonableness of an alleged belief in determining whether a defendant had such a belief.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-6-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-17-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(6) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57 After section 474.29 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Insert: Offences relating to use of carriage service for suicide-related material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits use of carriage service for suicide-related material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Section 474.30 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Repeal section 474.30 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-norm

59 Before section 475.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Amendments relating to sexual offences against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-59-norm

58 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

475 Section 475
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-475
has part: 475(1) Section 475
has part: 475(2) Section 475
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62

475(1) Section 475
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-ss-1
part of: 475 Section 475
note: Good faith exemption for employees of NRS providers from certain offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 475(1) Section 475
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Good faith exemption
premise text: Employee is acting in good faith
conclusion text: No criminal responsibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

475(2) Section 475
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-ss-2
part of: 475 Section 475
note: Good faith exemption from criminal liability for emergency call persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 475(2) Section 475
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Good faith exemption
premise text: Emergency call person in good faith
conclusion text: Not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

475 Section 475
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-2
has part: 475(1) Section 475
has part: 475(2) Section 475
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62

475(1) Section 475
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1
part of: 475 Section 475
note: Presumption of carriage service use in offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 475(1) Section 475
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Presumption
logic summary: Presumption of carriage service use
premise text: (a) a physical element of an offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474 consists of a person using a carriage service to engage in particular conduct;
conclusion text: then it is presumed, unless the person proves to the contrary, that the person used a carriage service to engage in that conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Absolute liability
logic summary: Absolute liability applies to physical element of offence that carriage service was used
premise text: Absolute liability applies to physical element of offence that carriage service was used
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relation between physical element of offence and carriage service use
premise text: (1) If: (a) a physical element of an offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474 consists of a person using a carriage service to engage in particular conduct;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of carriage service use in offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474
premise text: (1) If: (a) a physical element of an offence against Subdivision C, D, E or F of Division 474 consists of a person using a carriage service to engage in particular conduct;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Burden of proof
logic summary: Defendant bears legal burden in relation to matter in subsection
premise text: Note: A defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the matter in this subsection, see section 13.4.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

475(2) Section 475
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2
part of: 475 Section 475
note: Absolute liability applies to the physical element of the offence that a carriage service was used to engage in that particular conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a carriage service to engage in particular conduct.
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;
conclusion text: then absolute liability applies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the carriage service and the particular conduct.
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of carriage service use and particular conduct.
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive relation
logic summary: Establishes a diffusive relation between the carriage service and the particular conduct.
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-475-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about the carriage service and particular conduct.
premise text: (2) If: ... and (b) the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the person intended to engage in that particular conduct;
conclusion text: ... absolute liability applies...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

60 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Defines 'make available' in relation to material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms
premise text: Insert:
conclusion text: make available, in relation to material
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60-2
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Inserts an offence against Subdivision B or C of Division 471, or D or F of Division 474, of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of serious
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inserts
logic summary: Inserts an obligation into the law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Paragraph 15GE(2)(v)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Omit 'child sex tourism' and substitute with a sexual offence against a person under 18 outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits child sex tourism
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Subsection 15GE(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with new serious Commonwealth offence provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specific offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Amendments apply in relation to a controlled operation authorized on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-norm

65 Paragraph 15Y(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-norm

66 After paragraph 15Y(1)(caa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: List of offences against specific divisions of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Paragraph 15Y(1)(ca)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Repeal certain offences and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Paragraph 15Y(1)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Omit certain paragraphs and substitute with others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-norm

69 Paragraph 15Y(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Omit specific paragraphs and substitute with preceding ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69-norm

70 Section 15YT
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-norm

15YT Video link evidence provisions relating to child sex offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15yt
note: Relates to child sex offences, unaffected by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15yt-norm

62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-2
note: Prohibition on using video link evidence in certain child sex offence cases outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Sections 15Y and 15YT of the Crimes Act 1914 continue to apply in relation to an offence against Part IIIA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Continues to apply despite amendments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Subparagraph 30(1)(a)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Repeal a subparagraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-norm

73 Subparagraph 30(1)(a)(viii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Omit or substitute specific section numbers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-norm

74 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
note: Continues to apply certain provisions despite amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation continues
premise text: amendment made by item 72
conclusion text: subparagraph 30(1)(a)(iii) of the Surveillance Devices Act 2004
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

75 Subsection 5D(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-norm

76 Subparagraph 5D(3)(d)(xi)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
note: Omit specific phrase from section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Subsection 5D(3B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with new provisions related to sexual offences against children.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of certain conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
note: Applicability of subsection 5D(3B) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Obligation to apply subsection 5D(3B)
premise text: (1) Subject to subitems (2) and (3), subsection 5D(3B) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, as in force on and after the commencement of this item, applies...
conclusion text: ...subsection 5D(3B) of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, as in force on and after the commencement of this item, applies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-474-18
note: Prohibition on certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-474-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids certain offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-2
note: Prohibition on sexual offences against children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids sexual offences against children
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Defines child abuse material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: child abuse material has the same meaning as in Part 10.6 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Defines child pornography material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: child pornography material has the same meaning as in Part 10.6 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Defines Commonwealth child sex offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific provisions of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Is a subclass of offences against certain other provisions in force before the commencement of Part IE
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Applies to offences committed before the commencement of Part IE
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Data includes information in any form and any program (or part of a program).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Defines data storage device
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 3C(1) (definition of data)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Repeal the definition of data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 Subsection 3C(1) (definition of data storage device)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Repeal definition of data storage device
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-norm

8 After Part ID
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-norm

23ZA Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23za
note: Application of Part to forfeitable thing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZA Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part applies to a thing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
note: Prohibits possession of child abuse material or child pornography material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits possession of child abuse material or child pornography material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of prohibited items.
conclusion text: 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z to 2010-12-31T23:59:59Z
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Applies to all locations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: throughout
logic summary: Applies to all media.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: for
logic summary: Defines the scope of prohibited items in terms of AI systems.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb
has part: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(7) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70

23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Constable must give forfeiture notice if reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to give forfeiture notice
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Must give forfeiture notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving forfeiture notice
premise text: This section applies if a constable reasonably believes that the forfeitable thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Between giving forfeiture notice and the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving forfeiture notice
premise text: This section applies if a constable reasonably believes that the forfeitable thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Between giving forfeiture notice and the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Notice must be given to the owner of the forfeitable thing or the person possessing it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Notice must be given
premise text: The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)
conclusion text: A person who owns the forfeitable thing or the person possessing it must receive the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for giving notice
premise text: (2) The constable may give a notice (the forfeiture notice) described in subsection (3)
conclusion text: The notice must be given within the same temporal interval as the seizure.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Forfeiture notice must be given to certain persons before the thing is forfeited.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of possession or use of the thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of persons affected by the forfeiture notice.
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (a) identifies the forfeitable thing; and (b) states the constable’s belief that the thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: Requirement to provide written notice before forfeiture.
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (c) states that the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object to the forfeiture by written notice given before ComLaw Authoritative Act C2010A00042
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Timeframe for providing written notice.
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (d) explains the circumstances in which, under section 23ZC, a person may be given a copy of parts of the thing, or of data contained in the thing, on request to the head of the police force made within 30 days after the notice is given;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of possession or use of the thing.
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (a) identifies the forfeitable thing; and (b) states the constable’s belief that the thing is derived from, or was used in connection with, the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of persons affected by the forfeiture notice.
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that: (c) states that the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object to the forfeiture by written notice given before ComLaw Authoritative Act C2010A00042
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-4
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Giving forfeiture notice to anyone directly or indirectly affected by the proposed forfeiture.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Forfeiture of material by operation of law at the end of a period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to forfeit material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Head of police force must instruct Director to apply for forfeiture order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Head of police force must instruct Director to apply for forfeiture order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Legal Person
premise text: State is a LegalPerson
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(7) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Forfeiture of material by operation of law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits forfeiture of material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
note: Admissible evidence in Commonwealth child sex offence prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Legal obligation
conclusion text: The evidence is admissible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc
has part: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72

23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-1
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: Request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: Head of police force must comply with request if reasonably practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: Request is made
conclusion text: Compliance required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLY PRACTICABLE
logic summary: Practicability condition for compliance
premise text: Request is made
conclusion text: Compliance allowed if practicable
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: Exemption from providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited under certain conditions.
description: No
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits providing copies of innocuous parts under certain conditions.
premise text: Reasonable belief in endangering safety or prejudicing investigation or prosecution.
conclusion text: No provision required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Head of police force has reasonable belief in conditions.
premise text: Reasonable belief in endangering safety or prejudicing investigation or prosecution.
conclusion text: Justification for exemption.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
logic summary: Condition applies to temporal interval of request.
premise text: Request made within certain time frame.
conclusion text: Exemption only applicable during that time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: Pay costs incurred by police force in complying with request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: Request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
conclusion text: Pay costs incurred by police force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd
has part: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73

23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Forfeiture of material by court order on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Notice to be given to claimants and affected parties
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Court may make interim orders on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make interim orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Forfeiture of material by court order on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits forfeiture of material by court order on application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
has part: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
has part: 70(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.74

70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-5
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: The court may order the Commonwealth to pay compensation to a person who owns or has property in electronic equipment if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: The court has an obligation to order compensation if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The conditions must be met during the hearing of the application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-6
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
note: Standard of proof for subsections (1) and (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: standard
logic summary: Establishes standard of proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze
has part: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75

23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: This section applies if a thing is forfeited to the Commonwealth under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: A thing is forfeited to the Commonwealth under this Part.
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: The thing forfeited becomes the property of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
logic summary: Obligation to transfer ownership
premise text: (2) When the thing is forfeited
conclusion text: it becomes the property of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: Seizure of thing without warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A constable may, without warrant, seize the thing.
conclusion text: Seizure of thing without warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-4
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: Commissioner's discretion to deal with forfeited thing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-4-norm

23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: Police head may deal with seized thing in any way they consider appropriate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to deal with thing
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between police custody and action
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of police action on thing
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Police action influences thing's fate
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Process
logic summary: Police action as process on thing
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues the effect of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
premise text: (6) Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.
conclusion text: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) continue to have effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23ze-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues the prohibition of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
premise text: (6) Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.
conclusion text: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) are prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf
has part: 23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(4) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75

23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
note: Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: State has obligation to compensate
premise text: (1) This section applies to a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
note: Commonwealth liable to pay compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
note: Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZF(4) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
note: Court must determine compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZF(4) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to determine compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 No.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
note: Forfeiture of property for Commonwealth child sex offence convictions or findings in civil proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the forfeiture of property for specified convictions or findings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZG Delegation by head of police force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23zg
note: Head of police force may delegate powers to a constable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZG Delegation by head of police force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Application of Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914 applies to Commonwealth child sex offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Application of Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part IE of the Crimes Act 1914 applies to Commonwealth child sex offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-474
note: Offences against certain sections of the Criminal Code are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-474-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-474-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-sexual-offences-against-children-act-2010-sch-2-sec-474-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed