Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2011
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 2 of 2011
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to the enforcement of the criminal law, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the scope of the Act
premise text: Scope definition
conclusion text: Definition of the Act's scope
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 March 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-2-2-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-2-3-norm

2 March 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-2-4-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Schedule 3: Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-3-norm

3 March 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-3-2-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: The day this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-4-norm

2 March 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-5
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-2-5-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-3
note: Schedules governing amendments and repeals of Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-3-3-norm

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Defines serious misconduct for staff members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with legal force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 After section 47
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Insert clause after section 47
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-2-norm

47A Termination of employment of member of staff for serious
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a
note: Termination of employment for serious misconduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-47a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-47a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-47a-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-47a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: CEO prohibits termination for serious misconduct
premise text: CEO has power to terminate employment
conclusion text: Termination is prohibited for serious misconduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-47a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Termination overlaps with staff member's employment
premise text: CEO terminates staff member's employment
conclusion text: Termination overlaps with staff member's employment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Application of item 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Section applies in relation to termination of employment after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Application of item 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Section imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of section 59A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Add '(other than a power or function under section 47A)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding a clause to an existing provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of paragraph (aa) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Investigations and reports on staff members of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of paragraph (aa) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Staff members of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 are subject to investigations and reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 After paragraph 68(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Must provide information to Chief Executive Officer if certain conditions apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Applicability of amended Telecommunications Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-7-norm

8 Review of operation of amendments relating to serious
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Review of operation of amendments relating to serious misconduct by staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 46A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Omit 'a special', substitute 'an'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 Savings provision for item 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Savings provision for item 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-2-norm

3 At the end of section 46A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: The CEO must take action after a certain date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 December each year, notify the Minister in writing of:
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Notify Minister of CEO arrangements and ACC operation/investigation details annually.
description: (a) each arrangement that the CEO has made with an examiner under subsection (3) during the previous 6 months; and (b) the nature of the ACC operation/investigation to which the arrangement relates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 December each year, notify the Minister in writing of:
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify Minister annually.
premise text: (a) each arrangement that the CEO has made with an examiner under subsection (3) during the previous 6 months; and (b) the nature of the ACC operation/investigation to which the arrangement relates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for 'previous 6 months'.
premise text: (a) each arrangement that the CEO has made with an examiner under subsection (3) during the previous 6 months; and (b) the nature of the ACC operation/investigation to which the arrangement relates.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring trace for 'annual notification'.
premise text: (a) each arrangement that the CEO has made with an examiner under subsection (3) during the previous 6 months; and (b) the nature of the ACC operation/investigation to which the arrangement relates.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Diffusion logic for 'annual notification'.
premise text: (a) each arrangement that the CEO has made with an examiner under subsection (3) during the previous 6 months; and (b) the nature of the ACC operation/investigation to which the arrangement relates.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-31-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: CogAI logic for 'annual notification'.
premise text: (a) each arrangement that the CEO has made with an examiner under subsection (3) during the previous 6 months; and (b) the nature of the ACC operation/investigation to which the arrangement relates.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Transitional provision for item 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Defines the period for notification under subsection 46A(4) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 46B(4) (third sentence)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Repeal a sentence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Application of item 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Amendment applies to appointment of examiner after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Application of item 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 At the end of subsection 46B(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Examiner eligibility for reappointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 At the end of subsection 46B(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Eligibility condition
premise text: Examiner is eligible for reappointment
conclusion text: State must provide note on eligibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 46B(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Examiner may be appointed on a full-time or part-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to appoint examiner on a full-time or part-time basis.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 46D(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Omit 'An examiner', substitute 'A full-time examiner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-9-norm

10 Subsection 46D(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Omit 'an examiner', substitute 'a full-time examiner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-10-norm

11 At the end of section 46D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Grant part-time examiner leave of absence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to grant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 46G
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Substitute 'A full-time examiner' for 'An examiner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12-norm

13 At the end of section 46G
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
has part: 13(2) At the end of section 46G
has part: 13(3) At the end of section 46G
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14

13(2) At the end of section 46G
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 At the end of section 46G
note: Part-time examiner must not engage in paid employment that conflicts with duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(2) At the end of section 46G
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of action
premise text: (2) A part-time examiner must not engage in any paid employment...
conclusion text: No paid employment that conflicts with duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between duties and employment
premise text: (2) A part-time examiner must not engage in any paid employment...
conclusion text: Duties and employment overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of duty on employment
premise text: (2) A part-time examiner must not engage in any paid employment...
conclusion text: Employment implies breach of duty.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated prohibition of action
premise text: (2) A part-time examiner must not engage in any paid employment...
conclusion text: Prohibition is propagated to all related actions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Artificial intelligence classification of duty and employment
premise text: (2) A part-time examiner must not engage in any paid employment...
conclusion text: Duty and employment are classified as conflicting.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(3) At the end of section 46G
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-3
part of: 13 At the end of section 46G
note: The CEO requires the part-time examiner to provide details about their employment.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: The CEO requires the part-time examiner to provide details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Paragraph 46H(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Insertion of '(being a full-time examiner)' after 'the examiner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-14-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Paragraph 46H(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Paragraph 46H(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Insertion of '(being a full-time examiner)' after 'the examiner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-15-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Paragraph 46H(2)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Paragraph 46H(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Omit “office.” and substitute “office (see subsection 46G(1)); or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-16-norm

17 At the end of subsection 46H(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Examiner must not engage in paid employment that conflicts with duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-17-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 At the end of subsection 46H(2)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conflicting employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Savings provision for items 5 to 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: No effect on appointment validity before commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Savings provision for items 5 to 17
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 3K(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Omit 'or constable assisting', substitute 'of a warrant in relation to premises, or constable assisting,'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove the phrase 'or constable assisting'
premise text: Subsection 3K(1)
conclusion text: New text: of a warrant in relation to premises, or constable assisting,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 3K(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Omit 'the premises' and substitute with a warrant or thing found during search.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'the premises'
premise text: Omitting 'the premises' is prohibited.
conclusion text: Substitute with warrant or thing found during search.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Paragraph 3K(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Insertion of phrase in occupier's title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-3-norm

4 At the end of subsection 3K(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Person must consent in writing for a thing found during a search under a warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 At the end of subsection 3K(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide consent in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Paragraph 3K(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Replace 'the occupier' with 'the person referred to in paragraph (2)(b) or (c)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Paragraph 3K(3)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace
logic summary: Replace 'the occupier' with 'the person referred to in paragraph (2)(b) or (c)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Paragraph 3K(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Omit 'the occupier', substitute 'that person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-6-norm

7 Subsection 3K(3C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Substitute a specific person in a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Subsection 3K(3C)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 3K(3C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Replace 'the occupier' with 'that person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Subsection 3K(3C)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: replacement
logic summary: Replacement of a term with an alternative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 3K(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Omit specific phrase from warrant premises operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 3L(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Omit specific phrase from warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified phrase
premise text: Omitting the phrase is not allowed
conclusion text: The phrase must be included
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 3LAA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Omit “found at the warrant premises”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraph 3LAA(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Modify definition of 'occupier' in equipment context
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Paragraph 3LAA(5)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Modify
logic summary: Change definition
premise text: Original text
conclusion text: New text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subparagraph 3LA(1)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Repeal and substitute a condition related to movement under subsection 3K(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits movement under subsection 3K(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subparagraph 3LA(1)(a)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Omit specific phrase from warrant premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 3LA(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: Repeal the second sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-15-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Subsection 3LA(3) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Paragraph 3LB(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Duty to amend the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to amend the Crimes Act 1914
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Paragraph 3LB(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
note: Substitute phrase in data premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-17-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Paragraph 3LB(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 3LB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
note: Substitute phrase in data premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Subsection 3LB(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
premise text: State must substitute phrase
conclusion text: State shall substitute phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 3M(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Regard must be had to whether any person provided appropriate warning or guidance on the operation of equipment.
description: warning or guidance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Subsection 3M(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regard must be had to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 3ZQV(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
note: Omit 'from warrant premises'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 3ZQV(5) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
note: Omit specific phrase from warrant premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits removal of phrase
premise text: Omit ‘removed under that section from warrant premises’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘moved under that section’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 3ZQW(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
note: Regard must be had to whether any appropriate warning or guidance was provided before equipment operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Subsection 3ZQW(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regard must be had to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Application of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
note: Commences of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
note: Defines terrorist act for legal purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a key term.
premise text: The Criminal Code defines...
conclusion text: ...as the same meaning as in subsection 100.1(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 3C(1) (definition of magistrate)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
note: Substitute definition of magistrate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: substitution
logic summary: Definition substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Section 3CA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
note: Omit '3ZQZ' and substitute '3ZQZB'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-26-norm

27 Section 3UA (definition of terrorist act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
note: Repeal the definition of terrorist act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-27-norm

28 Subsection 3ZQM(7) (definition of terrorist act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
note: Repeal the definition of terrorist act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-28-norm

29 Subdivision B of Division 4C of Part IAA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Before paragraph 3ZQX(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
note: Permits retention of thing under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-30-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 At the end of section 3ZQX
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
has part: 31(3) At the end of section 3ZQX
has part: 31(4) At the end of section 3ZQX
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.21

31(3) At the end of section 3ZQX
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-ss-3
part of: 31 At the end of section 3ZQX
note: Commissioner must return document to person who produced it or its owner if not entitled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(3) At the end of section 3ZQX
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(4) At the end of section 3ZQX
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-ss-4
part of: 31 At the end of section 3ZQX
note: The Commissioner does not have to take steps if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: The Commissioner has an obligation that is exempted under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-31-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
logic summary: The Commissioner does not have to take steps if the application for an order has not been determined.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Subdivision C of Division 4C of Part IAA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
note: Repeal the heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-32-norm

33 Paragraph 3ZQY(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
note: Repeal and substitute paragraph 3ZQY(2)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Paragraph 3ZQY(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Section 3ZQZ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-34-norm

35 Subdivision D of Division 4C of Part IAA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
note: Repeal the heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-35-norm

36 At the end of subsection 3ZQZA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
note: Things may be retained under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-36-norm

37 Subsection 3ZQZA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
note: Omit “If”, substitute “Despite subsection (2), if”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-37-norm

38 Subsection 3ZQZA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
premise text: Temporal interval required
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Section 3ZQZB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
has part: 39(1) Section 3ZQZB
has part: 39(2) Section 3ZQZB
has part: 39(3) Section 3ZQZB
has part: 39(4) Section 3ZQZB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22

39(1) Section 3ZQZB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Section 3ZQZB
note: Magistrate may make an order on application by the Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(1) Section 3ZQZB
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Section 3ZQZB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Section 3ZQZB
note: Preventing use in committing terrorist act, terrorism offence or serious offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for retention of seized items
premise text: (2) The magistrate may order that a thing seized under Division 3 or 3A be retained for the period specified in the order if the magistrate is satisfied that the thing is being used, or is required to be used, for a purpose mentioned in section 3ZQU or for other judicial or administrative review proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace of seized items
premise text: (2) The magistrate may order that a thing seized under Division 3 or 3A be retained for the period specified in the order if the magistrate is satisfied that the thing is being used, or is required to be used, for a purpose mentioned in section 3ZQU or for other judicial or administrative review proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of retained items
premise text: (2) The magistrate may order that a thing seized under Division 3 or 3A be retained for the period specified in the order if the magistrate is satisfied that the thing is being used, or is required to be used, for a purpose mentioned in section 3ZQU or for other judicial or administrative review proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justification for retention of seized items
premise text: (2) The magistrate may order that a thing seized under Division 3 or 3A be retained for the period specified in the order if the magistrate is satisfied that the thing is being used, or is required to be used, for a purpose mentioned in section 3ZQU or for other judicial or administrative review proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(3) Section 3ZQZB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39-ss-3
part of: 39 Section 3ZQZB
note: Magistrate may make orders if satisfied reasonable grounds exist to suspect thing or document will be used in commission of terrorist act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(3) Section 3ZQZB
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate may make orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(4) Section 3ZQZB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39-ss-4
part of: 39 Section 3ZQZB
note: Forfeiture of thing or document to the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits retention of thing or document
premise text: (4) The orders are as follows:
conclusion text: the thing or document is forfeited to the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with time periods of retention and forfeiture
premise text: (b) an order that the thing or document is forfeited to the Commonwealth;
conclusion text: the thing or document overlaps with a time period of forfeiture
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of thing or document's status as forfeited
premise text: (b) an order that the thing or document is forfeited to the Commonwealth;
conclusion text: the thing or document has a recurring trace of being forfeited
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads information about thing or document's status as forfeited
premise text: (b) an order that the thing or document is forfeited to the Commonwealth;
conclusion text: the information spreads about the thing or document being forfeited
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-39-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes thing or document as forfeited by AI system
premise text: (b) an order that the thing or document is forfeited to the Commonwealth;
conclusion text: the AI system recognizes the thing or document as forfeited
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Application of items 30 to 39
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40
note: Amendments apply to things seized or documents produced under Part IAA of the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the amendment to apply to specified things and documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Section 3ZW
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-41
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-41-norm

42 At the end of section 3ZW
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
note: Delegate powers to Commonwealth officer under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Commissioner may delegate powers
conclusion text: Powers delegated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

43 After paragraph 3ZJ(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-43
note: Both fingerprints or photographs of a person and imprisonment for 12 months or more must be applied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 After paragraph 3ZJ(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: AND
logic summary: Combination of conditions
premise text: Both conditions must be met.
conclusion text: Obligation applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Application of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-44
note: Applicable to persons taken into custody after Part commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Application of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Applicable obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 At the end of subsection 20(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Commissioner may authorise special payments to Deputy Commissioners.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-1-norm

2 At the end of subsection 27(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Commissioner may authorise special payments to AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-2-norm

3 At the end of subsection 35(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Authorise special payments to consultants and independent contractors who are AFP appointees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-3-norm

4 After Division 3 of Part III
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Insert clause after Division 3 of Part III
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-4-norm

35A Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35a
has part: 35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(2) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(3) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(4) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(5) Payments in special circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27

35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35a-ss-1
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Commissioner may authorise payments to a person under special circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(2) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35a-ss-2
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Commissioner may authorise payments to AFP appointees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(2) Payments in special circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(3) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35a-ss-3
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Payments may be authorised under this section even though the payments would not otherwise be authorised by law or required to meet a legal liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make payments under this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(4) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35a-ss-4
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: No authorisation can be made under this section if it would involve a total amount of more than $100,000.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on making authorisation under this section if it would exceed $100,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(5) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35a-ss-5
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Payment recovery upon breach of conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-35a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Payment recovery upon breach of conditions
premise text: Conditions may be attached to payments under this section.
conclusion text: If a condition is breached, the payment may be recovered by the Commonwealth as a debt in a court of competent jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 At the end of subsection 40E(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Commissioner may authorise special payments to special members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-5-norm

6 At the end of section 40EC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: Commissioner may authorise special payments to special protective service officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-6-norm

7 At the end of subsection 69A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
note: Commissioner may authorise special payments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make special payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 69C
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-8-norm

9 Section 69C
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Insertion of text after section 69C
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-9-norm

10 At the end of section 69C
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: Commissioner may delegate power to senior executive AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-10-norm

11 At the end of subsection 69D(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
note: Commissioner may authorise special payments to a person performing functions under an agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-11-norm

12 Application of item 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Amendment applies in special circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Application of item 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed