1 Subsections 50(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.8
note: Omit 'a market', substitute 'any market'
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

179 Amendments of section 50
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.8
note: Amendments of section 50 apply to acquisitions after commencement
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-179-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-179-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-179-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision requires a temporal relation between acquisitions and commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal relations are required for conditional commencement

2 Subsection 50(6) (definition of market)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.8
note: Omit “substantial”.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

3 At the end of Part XIII
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.8
note: Add at the end of Part XIII
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 50(1) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.8
note: Omit 'a market', substitute 'any market'
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 50(6) of Schedule 1 (definition of market)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.8
note: Omit “substantial”.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

1 Sections 12CB and 12CC
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

12CB Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12CB(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
has part: 12CB(2) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
has part: 12CB(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
has part: 12CB(4) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
has part: 12CB(5) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cb
schema version: 2

12CB(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
note: Prohibition on unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12CB Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition applies during trade or commerce
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Trade or commerce

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unconscionable conduct is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on unconscionable conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Trade or commerce

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12CB(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

12CB(2) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
note: Exemption from application of section for conduct related to legal proceedings or arbitration.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12CB Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage in conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

12CB(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
note: Court must not consider unforeseeable circumstances when determining contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12CB Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not consider unforeseeable circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotConsider
premise text: None

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Court may consider circumstances reasonably foreseeable at the time of contravention.
modality: Epistemic
operator: ReasonablyForeseeable
premise text: None

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12CB(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

12CB(4) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
note: This section is not limited by the unwritten law of the States and Territories relating to unconscionable conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12CB Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: This section imposes an obligation on the Parliament.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

12CB(5) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.9
note: Definition of listed public company
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12CB Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Listed public company
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Term used in section

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12CB(5) Unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services

12CC Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12CC(1) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
has part: 12CC(2) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
has part: 12CC(3) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cc
schema version: 2

12CC(1) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.10
note: Court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 12CB in connection with the supply or possible supply of financial services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12CC Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the extent to which the supplier’s conduct towards the service recipient was consistent with the supplier’s conduct in similar transactions between the supplier and other like service recipients;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The text mentions specific time-related factors, such as the amount for which the service recipient could have acquired identical or equivalent financial services.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has a temporal relation
premise text: (e) the amount for which, and the circumstances under which, the service recipient could have acquired identical or ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011A00184 Unconscionable conduct Schedule 2 equivalent financial services from a person other than the

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may have regard to: (a) the relative strengths of the bargaining positions of the supplier and the service recipient; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may consider various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 12CB.
modality: Deontic
operator: may have regard to
premise text: (1) Without limiting the matters to which the court may have regard for the purpose of determining...

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct of the supplier and the service recipient in complying with the terms and conditions of the contract;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The text imposes obligations on the supplier, such as disclosing information and acting in good faith.
modality: Deontic
operator: has a duty
premise text: (i) if there is a contract between the supplier and the service recipient for the supply of the financial services: (i) the extent to which the supplier was willing to negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract with the service recipient;

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the extent to which the supplier unreasonably failed to disclose to the service recipient: (i) any intended conduct of the supplier that might affect the interests of the service recipient;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The text mentions specific factors that must be considered in a particular order, such as the relative strengths of the bargaining positions.
modality: LTL
operator: has an ordered trace
premise text: (a) the relative strengths of the bargaining positions of the supplier and the service recipient; and

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12CC(1) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

12CC(2) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.10
note: Court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 12CB in connection with the acquisition or possible acquisition of financial services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12CC Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...within a specific time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court's consideration of various factors is within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within a temporal interval
premise text: (2) Without limiting...

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...when determining whether a person has contravened section 12CB.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court's obligation to consider various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 12CB.
modality: Deontic
operator: may have regard to
premise text: The court may have regard to...

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...not absolute.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court's obligation to disclose information is not absolute.
modality: Deontic
operator: may not require disclosure
premise text: the acquirer unreasonably failed to...

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...part of a recurring pattern.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Court's consideration of various factors is part of a recurring pattern.
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
premise text: The court may have regard to...

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12CC(2) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

12CC(3) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.10
note: Industry code definition
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12cc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12CC Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

2 Paragraph 131(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
note: Substitute section numbers
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
has part: 21(2) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
has part: 21(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
has part: 21(4) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

21(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
note: Prohibition on unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No unconscionable conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Trade or commerce

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services

21(2) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
note: Exempt from unconscionable conduct
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) This section does not apply to conduct that is engaged in only because the person engaging in the conduct:

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies exempt condition
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) This section does not apply to conduct that is engaged in only because the person engaging in the conduct:

21(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
note: Court must not consider unforeseeable circumstances when determining contravention.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not consider unforeseeable circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotConsider
premise text: None

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Court may consider circumstances reasonably foreseeable at the time of contravention.
modality: Epistemic
operator: ReasonablyForeseeable
premise text: None

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(3) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services

21(4) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.14
note: Court must consider contract terms and manner of performance when determining unconscionable conduct.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider contract terms and manner of performance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-21-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(4) Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services

22 Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
has part: 22(2) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

22(1) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
note: Court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: withinTemporalInterval

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
modality: CogAI
operator: hasKnowledgeGraph

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
modality: Deontic
operator: mayHaveRegardTo

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
modality: LTL
operator: hasRecurringTrace

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: The court may have regard to various factors when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
modality: SHACL
operator: hasSchema

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

22(2) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.15
note: Court may have regard to certain matters when determining whether a person has contravened section 21 in connection with the acquisition or possible acquisition of goods or services.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of

22A Presumptions relating to whether representations are
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.18
note: Presumptions relating to whether representations are misleading
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22a
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-22a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22A Presumptions relating to whether representations are

3 Subsection 20(2) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
note: Omit “or 22”.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Sections 21 and 22 of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Item 36 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute certain section numbers in Schedule 5.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Item 36 of Schedule 5

2 Item 50 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit “or of the Australian Consumer Law”.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

3 Item 54 of Schedule 5 (note)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit “or Australian Consumer Law”.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Item 65 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit specified provision from law.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on omission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

5 Item 71 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit specified phrase from Australian Consumer Law.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6 Item 74 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'or 6(1)'
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Item 90 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit specified provisions of the Australian Consumer Law.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8 Item 90 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'Division 2', substitute 'or Division 2'
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

9 Item 96 of Schedule 5
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.19
note: Omit ‘or a’, substitute ‘, or of a’.
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting ‘or a’, substituting ‘, or of a’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
note: Table of sections
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 January 2012
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 January 2011
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
note: Note on table limitations and amendments
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement rules
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1 commencement provision
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 2 commencement
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
note: Schedules apply to Acts
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 5
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-4-norm
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

6 December
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 February 2012
type: Concept
source: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011.pdf, p.6
asserts: competition-and-consumer-legislation-amendment-act-2011-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Act 2011
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the law relating to competition and consumers, and for related purposes
identifier: No. 184 of 2011
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU