1 Subsection 29(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Omit 'may', substitute 'must'.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omit 'may', substitute 'must'.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

10 Paragraph 29(4)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Substitute interest is not held for property is not owned.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to substitute
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

100 Subsection 180(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.31
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-100-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-100
schema version: 2

101 Subsection 180(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.31
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-101-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-101
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Do not omit specified phrase
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘(including the nature and location of any property)’.

102 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.31
note: Conditional commencement of section 180
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-102-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-102
schema version: 2

103 After section 180
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.31
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-103-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-103
schema version: 2

104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 104(1) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
has part: 104(2) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
has part: 104(3) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
has part: 104(4) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104
schema version: 2

104 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.33
note: Application of sections 180A and 180B to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1)

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines a cognitive AI pattern for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (1)

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to apply sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1)

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines a diffusion pattern for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (1)

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1)

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104 Application

104(1) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.23
note: Application for order under section 102 or 103 after forfeiture
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Claiming an interest in forfeited property
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(1) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103

104(2) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.23
note: Cannot make an application for an order under section 102 without court leave
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot make an application
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court leave required

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(2) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103

104(3) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.23
note: Court may give leave to apply under section 102 or 103
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may give leave to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: May

104(4) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
description: yes
source: act.pdf, p.23
note: Must provide written notice to DPP of application and grounds.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Written notice is obligatory.
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATORY NOTICE

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(4) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103

105 Subsection 181(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.34
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-105-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105
schema version: 2

106 Subsection 181(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.34
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-106-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-106
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

107 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.34
note: Commences on a specified date, applying to convictions quashed after that date.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-107-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-107
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Date of commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines commencement date
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement specified on or after a certain date

108 Section 182
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.35
note: Insert '(1)' before 'An'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-108-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-108
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to insert '(1)'
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of '(1)'
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
premise text: Text modification

109 At the end of section 182
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.35
note: Court must consider examination order without notice if DPP requests.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-109-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-109
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

11 Section 29A
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
note: Omit 'may', substitute 'must'.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘must’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Omit ‘may’

110 Subsection 187(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.35
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’ (first occurring)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-110-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

111 After paragraph 187(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.35
note: Exemptions from examination based on changes in person's status
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-111-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-111
schema version: 2

112 Paragraph 187(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.35
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-112-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-112
schema version: 2

113 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.36
note: Application of sections 182 and 187 to examination orders
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-113-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-113-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-113-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement is a temporal interval

114 Section 195 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.36
note: Omit penalty unit amount
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-114-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-114
schema version: 2

115 Subsection 196(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.36
note: Omit penalty unit amount
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-115-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-115
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting penalty unit amount
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

116 After section 197
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.36
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-116-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116
schema version: 2

117 Subparagraph 269(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.36
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-117-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

118 Section 338
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.37
note: Defines 'affairs of a person' for the purposes of this Act.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-118-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-118-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118 Section 338

119 Section 338 (definition of examination order)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.37
note: Insertion of section numbers in Schedule 1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-119-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119
schema version: 2

12 Section 29A
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
note: Substitute 'a specified interest in' for 'specified'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

120 After paragraph 202(5)(c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Requires document relevant to identifying, locating or quantifying property suspected of being proceeds of an indictable offence.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-120-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires document
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

act-sch-1-sec-120-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120 After paragraph 202(5)(c)

121 Paragraph 202(5)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Omit 'such property' and substitute 'property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-121
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘such property’

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘such property’

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'such property'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘such property’

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘such property’

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘such property’

122 Paragraph 202(5)(f)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Insertion of clause (ca) after clause (c)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-122-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122
schema version: 2

123 Subsection 202(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Insertion of paragraph (5)(ca) after subsection 202(6)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-123-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-123
schema version: 2

124 Subsection 202(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Replace 'subparagraph' with 'provision'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-124-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

125 After paragraph 203(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Specify form and manner of document production
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-125-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-125-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-125-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify form and manner
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-125-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 125 After paragraph 203(1)(c)

126 Subsection 203(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 126(2) Subsection 203(2)
has part: 126(3) Subsection 203(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126
schema version: 2

126(2) Subsection 203(2)
type: Concept
description: True
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Specify a time for production order at least 3 days after its issuance, or 14 days after its issuance if appropriate.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Subsection 203(2)

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify a time for production order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Specify a time for production order at least 3 days after its issuance, or 14 days after its issuance if appropriate
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126(2) Subsection 203(2)

126(3) Subsection 203(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Magistrate must consider urgency and hardship when deciding on an earlier time.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Subsection 203(2)

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must consider urgency and hardship.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The matters to which the magistrate must have regard...

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126(3) Subsection 203(2)

127 At the end of section 211
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.39
note: Defence for non-compliance with production order
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-127-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-127
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defence against offence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with production order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Failure to produce documents within specified time

act-sch-1-sec-127-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 127 At the end of section 211

128 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.39
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-128-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128
schema version: 2

129 Paragraphs 213(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.39
note: Insert 'or was' after 'is'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-129-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-129-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-129
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-129-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insert 'or was' after 'is'
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

13 Paragraph 29A(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
note: The court must be satisfied that the interest is held by a person other than the suspect.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court must be satisfied
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Paragraph 29A(b)

130 Paragraph 213(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.40
note: Omit “such”.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-130-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130
schema version: 2

131 Paragraph 213(1)(e)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.40
note: Insertion of 'or held' after 'hold'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-131-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-131
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 131 Paragraph 213(1)(e)

132 After paragraph 213(1)(e)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.40
note: Determine stored value card issuance and transaction details.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-132-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132 After paragraph 213(1)(e)

133 At the end of subsection 213(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.40
note: List of individuals and entities that may be added to the list in subsection 213(3)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-133-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-133
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 133 At the end of subsection 213(3)

134 Section 214
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.40
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-134-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-134-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134 Section 214

135 Paragraph 214(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.40
note: Insertion of record-keeping capabilities into paragraph 214(d)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-135-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of record-keeping capabilities
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS

act-sch-1-sec-135-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135 Paragraph 214(d)

136 Paragraph 214(e)
type: Concept
description: true
source: act.pdf, p.40
note: Specify that information or documents must be provided within a certain timeframe.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-136-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify that information or documents must be provided within a certain timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-136-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136 Paragraph 214(e)

137 At the end of section 214
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.41
note: Matters to which officer must have regard when deciding whether to specify an earlier day
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-137-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-137
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the provision as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart

act-sch-1-sec-137-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 137 At the end of section 214

138 Section 218
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.41
note: Insertion of number in section heading
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-138-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138
schema version: 2

139 At the end of section 218
type: Concept
description: true
source: act.pdf, p.41
note: Defence to an offence against subsection (1) if person fails to comply with notice.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-139-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-139-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-139-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence to an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-139-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139 At the end of section 218

14 Section 29A (note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
note: Substitute 'examinations in relation to the restraining order' for 'an examination of the applicant'.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Court must be satisfied that applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a temporal interval during which the court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for satisfying condition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant's interest in property is a specific instance of a concept that can be represented using CogAI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Interest in property is a concept that can be represented using CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: Applicant has an *interest in property covered by the restraining order.

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must be satisfied that applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy condition
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Applicant has applied for an order under this section.

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a temporal trace during which the court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for satisfying condition
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: The court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant's interest in property is a specific instance of a concept that can be validated using SHACL.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Interest in property is a concept that can be validated using SHACL
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
premise text: Applicant has an *interest in property covered by the restraining order.

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

140 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-140-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140
schema version: 2

141 Subsection 219(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.41
note: A judge may make an order regarding criminal matters on indictment.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-141-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-141
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-1-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141 Subsection 219(1)

142 Paragraph 219(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.42
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-142-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

143 Paragraph 219(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.42
note: Insert 'or card' after 'account'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-143-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-143
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Account or card
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
premise text: Text to be inserted

act-sch-1-sec-143-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143 Paragraph 219(2)(b)

144 Subsection 219(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.42
note: Replace 'in question' with 'or to whom the card was issued'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-144-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-144-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-144-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omit 'in question', substitute 'or to whom the card was issued'
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replacement of words
modality: Deontic
operator: replacement
premise text: Replace 'in question'

145 Paragraph 220(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.42
note: Specify name or names of account or person
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-145-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-145
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: specify

act-sch-1-sec-145-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 145 Paragraph 220(1)(a)

146 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.42
note: Application of the Act
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-146-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-146-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 146 Application

147 Section 338 (definition of account)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.42
note: Defines account as a facility or arrangement for accepting deposits or allowing withdrawals.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-147-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-147
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of account is substituted with a new definition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the definition of account
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Repeal the definition, substitute:

act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: account is defined as a fixed term deposit, safety deposit box, credit card account, loan account, cash management trust, or closed account
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies account into specific types
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: account means any facility or arrangement through which a financial institution accepts deposits or allows withdrawals

act-sch-1-sec-147-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 147 Section 338 (definition of account)

148 Section 338
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.43
note: Definition of stored value card
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-148-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type

149 After paragraph 39(1)(c)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.44
note: Suspect must provide sworn statement to specified person within a specified period.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide sworn statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-149-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149 After paragraph 39(1)(c)

149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 149A(1) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
has part: 149A(2) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
has part: 149A(3) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a
schema version: 2

149A(1) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.29
note: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order if certain conditions are met.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149A(1) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

149A(2) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.29
note: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal overlap between quashed conviction and pecuniary penalty order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt recognizes a pattern in the variation of pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to vary pecuniary penalty order amount
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt diffuses the obligation to vary pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt describes a recurring variation of pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149A(2) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

149A(3) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.29
note: Court may consider transcripts and evidence when determining penalty amount reduction.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court considers transcripts and evidence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider relevant matter
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149A(3) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order

15 Subsection 30(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
note: Allow person to apply for restraining order before it is made.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to apply for restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

150 Paragraph 39(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.44
note: Insertion of 'or a previous owner'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-150-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-150
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-150-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150 Paragraph 39(1)(d)

151 Paragraph 39(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.44
note: Insertion of 'or previous owner'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-151-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-151-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151 Paragraph 39(1)(d)

152 After paragraph 39(1)(d)
type: Concept
description: true
source: act.pdf, p.44
note: Order directing a person to provide information about property.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-152-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

act-sch-1-sec-152-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152 After paragraph 39(1)(d)

153 Paragraph 39(1)(g)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.44
note: Insertion of additional term in restraining order
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-153-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-153-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153 Paragraph 39(1)(g)

154 After subsection 39(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.44
note: Court must consider application for ancillary order without notice if DPP requests and restraining order was considered without notice.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-154-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-154-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-154
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-154-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must consider application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: DPP requests

155 After subsection 39(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 155(4A) After subsection 39(4)
has part: 155(4B) After subsection 39(4)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-155
schema version: 2

155(4A) After subsection 39(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.45
note: Court may direct DPP to give or publish notice of application.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 155 After subsection 39(4)

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Specify time and manner of notice
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 155(4A) After subsection 39(4)

155(4B) After subsection 39(4)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.45
note: Written notice to affected persons after ancillary order
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 155 After subsection 39(4)

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap of request and ancillary order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of request on ancillary order
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information spread from request to ancillary order
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationSpread
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal overlap of request and ancillary order
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.

156 After section 39
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.45
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-156-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-156
schema version: 2

157 Section 40 (note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Insertion of additional entity in a restraining order
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-157-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-157
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-157-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 157 Section 40 (note)

158 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Division 5 of Part 2-1 applies to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-158-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158
schema version: 2

158A Subparagraph 266A(1)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Substitute provision in Schedule 1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-158a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-158a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158a
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-158a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-158a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158A Subparagraph 266A(1)(a)(i)

159 Subsection 64(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.47
note: Omit specific court phrase
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-159-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-159-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-159
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-159-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit specific court phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

16 Subsection 31(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Subsection 31(1)
has part: 16(1A) Subsection 31(1)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 16(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 16(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 16(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

16(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: Must provide written notice to DPP of application and grounds.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice to DPP of application and grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

16(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: DPP may appear and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to appear and adduce evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

16(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: DPP must give notice of grounds to contest application
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

16(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: Application must wait for DPP examination
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must wait
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: DPP examination required

16(1) Subsection 31(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
note: Permits a person to apply for an order under section 29 or 29A if a restraining order covers property in which the person claims an interest.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Subsection 31(1)

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to apply for an order under section 29 or 29A.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1) Subsection 31(1)

16(1A) Subsection 31(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
note: Application must be made to the court that made the restraining order.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Subsection 31(1)

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made to the court that made the restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1A) Subsection 31(1)

160 Paragraph 64(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.47
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with transcript of proceeding against person for unlawful activity
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-160-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-160
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on the specified activity
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

161 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.47
note: Section applies in relation to forfeiture orders applied for on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-161-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-161
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: After commencement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section applies to forfeiture orders applied for on or after commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Commencement of this item

act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Whether conduct occurred before, on or after commencement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to forfeiture orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: Section 64 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

act-sch-1-sec-161-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 161 Application

162 Subsection 138(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.47
note: Omit specific court phrase from indictment application
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-162-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-162-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-162-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit specific court phrase from indictment application
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

163 Paragraph 138(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.47
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with transcript of proceeding against person for unlawful activity
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-163-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-163
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on the specified activity
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

164 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.47
note: Commences on or after commencement of this item
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-164-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-164
schema version: 2

165 After section 318
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-165-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165
schema version: 2

166 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.51
note: Sections 318A and 318B apply to statements made at an examination or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-166-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-166-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-166-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-166-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166 Application

167 Subsection 19(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
note: Omit 'indictable' from section heading.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-167-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-167
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits 'indictable'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

168 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
note: Section applies in relation to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-168-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-168
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability

act-sch-1-sec-168-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168 Application

169 Subsection 337(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal subsection 337(3)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-169-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-169
schema version: 2

17 At the end of subsection 31(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.13
note: No need to conduct examinations until a reasonable opportunity has been had.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No need to conduct examinations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct examinations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: DPP need not do so until...

170 After subsection 337(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
note: Disregard effect of orders on property control
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-170-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-170
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property control disregarded
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disregard orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: None

act-sch-1-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 170 After subsection 337(4)

171 At the end of section 337
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
note: Property may be subject to effective control of more than one person.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-171-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-171
schema version: 2

172 Paragraph 337A(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
note: Insert *production order, *search warrant before “restraining”.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-172-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-172
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits insertion of *production order, *search warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

173 Paragraph 337A(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
note: Insert specific terms after 'freezing order'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-173-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-173-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-173
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-173-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits insertion of terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

174 Subsection 337A(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal subsection 337A(3)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-174-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-174
schema version: 2

175 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.53
note: Section 337A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 applies to applications made on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-175-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-175
schema version: 2

176 Section 338 (definition of discretionary trust)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal the definition of discretionary trust.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-176-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-176
schema version: 2

177 Section 338 (paragraph (b) of the definition of evidential
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.53
note: Insert “, a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern” after ‘offence’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-177-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-177
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the insertion of a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern after ‘offence’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

178 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.53
note: Commencement of amendment applies to search warrants issued on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-178-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-178-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-178
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-178-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

179 Section 338 (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.53
note: Defines serious offence as a series of indictable offences with a value threshold
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-179-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179
schema version: 2

18 Paragraph 32(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.13
note: Substitute examinations in relation to the application
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.24
note: The DPP may appear and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

18(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: act.pdf, p.24
note: DPP must give applicant notice of grounds to contest application
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The DPP must give the applicant notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

18(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.24
note: Application must wait for DPP examination
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must wait
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: DPP examination required

act-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Substitute examinations in relation to the application
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

act-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Paragraph 32(b)

180 Section 338 (paragraph (a) of the definition of tainted
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.54
note: Insert “, a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern” after ‘offence’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-180-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the insertion of a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern after ‘offence’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

180A Examination orders relating to applications for exclusion from
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.31
note: Court may order examination of person with interest in property
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180a
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-180a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

act-sch-1-sec-180a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180A Examination orders relating to applications for exclusion from

180B Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180B(1) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
has part: 180B(2) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180b
schema version: 2

180B(1) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.32
note: Court may order examination of person with interest in forfeited property
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Examination orders relating to applications for compensation

act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180B(1) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation

180B(2) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.32
note: Ceases effect when application is withdrawn or court makes a decision.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Examination orders relating to applications for compensation

act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases effect
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (2) The *examination order ceases to have effect...

180C Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180C(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
has part: 180C(2) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180c
schema version: 2

180C(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.32
note: Court may order examination of person with interest in forfeited property
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180C Examination orders relating to applications under section 102

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for examination order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) If an application for an order under section 102...

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180C(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102

180C(2) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.32
note: Ceases effect when application is withdrawn or court makes a decision.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180C Examination orders relating to applications under section 102

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases effect
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (2) The *examination order ceases to have effect when...

180D Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180D(1) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
has part: 180D(2) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180d
schema version: 2

180D(1) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.33
note: Court may order examination of person against whom confiscation order was made or their spouse/de facto partner.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180D Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation

act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180D(1) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation

180D(2) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.33
note: Ceases effect when confiscation order proceedings are finally determined, withdrawn or otherwise disposed of.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180D Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation

act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

180E Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180E(1) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
has part: 180E(2) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180e
schema version: 2

180E(1) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.33
note: Court must order examination of person whose property was subject to restraining order or spouse/de facto partner.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180E Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked

act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must order examination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180E(1) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked

180E(2) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.33
note: Ceases effect when restraining order would have ceased to have effect
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180E Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked

181 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.54
note: Amendment applies in relation to search warrants applied for on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-181-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-181
schema version: 2

182 Section 338 (paragraph (b) of the definition of unlawful
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.54
note: Omit specific phrase from definition of unlawful activity
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-182-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The phrase must be included
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omitting the phrase is not allowed

183 At the end of subsection 45(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.55
note: New trial ordered in relation to offence.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-183-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-183
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide new trial
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-183-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 183 At the end of subsection 45(1)

184 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.55
note: Section applies in relation to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-184-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-184-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-184-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to restraining orders
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

act-sch-1-sec-184-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184 Application

185 Section 84
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.55
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The court'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-185-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-185-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185 Section 84

186 At the end of section 84
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.55
note: Requirement satisfaction condition
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-186-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-186
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-186-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186 At the end of section 84

187 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.55
note: Applicability of Section 84 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-187-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: None

188 Subsection 85(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.55
note: Substitute section 84(1)(a) for section 84(a)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-188-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-188
schema version: 2

189 Subsection 85(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Omit '84(b)', substitute '84(1)(b)'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-189-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-189
schema version: 2

19 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.13
note: Division 3 of Part 2-1 applies to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

190 Section 110
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The court'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-190-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-190
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-190-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 190 Section 110

191 At the end of section 110
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Requirement satisfaction assumption
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-191-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-191-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-191
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-191-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation implication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

act-sch-1-sec-191-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 191 At the end of section 110

192 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Commencement of section 110 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-192-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-192-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-192
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-192-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement date is specified in section 110
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement is on or after the specified date

193 Subsection 111(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Substitute section heading
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-193-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-193
schema version: 2

194 Subsection 111(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Omit “110(b)”, substitute “110(1)(b)”.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-194-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-194
schema version: 2

195 Paragraph 316(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Omit specific phrase from proceeding.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-195-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-195
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting a phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

196 Paragraph 316(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
note: Repeal paragraph 316(2)(b) and substitute with a new provision.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-196-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-196-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-196
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-196-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the repeal of paragraph 316(2)(b)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

197 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.57
note: Section applies in relation to proceedings under Chapter 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-197
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to proceedings under Chapter 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability

act-sch-1-sec-197-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 197 Application

197A Giving false or misleading answers or documents
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.36
note: Giving false or misleading answers or documents in an examination is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-197a
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-197a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is prohibited to give false or misleading answers or documents in an examination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Giving false or misleading answers or documents in an examination.

act-sch-1-sec-197a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 197A Giving false or misleading answers or documents

198 Subsection 296(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-198-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-198
schema version: 2

199 Subsection 297(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Change wording of a subsection heading
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-199-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-199-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-199
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-199-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace text with alternative
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

2 Subsection 29(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Replace 'specified' with 'a specified interest in'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 73(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.13
note: Insertion of phrase in subsection 73(1)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 20(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.26
note: Increase penalty amount under certain conditions
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May increase penalty amount
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

20(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.26
note: Court may consider additional factors when determining increase amount.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court discretion
modality: Deontic
operator: mayConsider

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

200 Subsection 297(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal subsection 297(2)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-200-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-200
schema version: 2

200A Subsection 298(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'in a particular financial year'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-200a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-200a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-200a
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-200a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

201 Section 299
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal a section.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-201-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-201-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-201
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-201-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL

202 Section 338 (definition of distributable funds)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal definition of distributable funds
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-202-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-202
schema version: 2

203 Section 338 (definition of suspended funds)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal the definition of suspended funds.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-203-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-203
schema version: 2

204 At the end of subsection 296(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
note: Addition of certain legislative references
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-204-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-204
schema version: 2

205 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.59
note: Applicable to amounts paid on or after commencement of Division
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-205-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-205-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-205
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-205-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable to amounts paid on or after commencement of Division
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

act-sch-1-sec-205-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 205 Application

206 At the end of section 55
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.59
note: Specify amount by reference to proportion of difference between forfeited interests and payments.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-206-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-206
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify amount by reference to proportion of difference between forfeited interests and payments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

207 After paragraph 297(1)(f)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.59
note: Mandatory payment by Commonwealth
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-207-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-207
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to pay
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make payments
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 72

act-sch-1-sec-207-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 207 After paragraph 297(1)(f)

208 Paragraph 297(1)(g)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.59
note: Prohibit making payments under an arrangement under paragraph 88(1)(b) or subsection 289(2)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-208-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-208
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

209 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.60
note: Applicable paragraphs of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-209-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-209
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable paragraphs of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 after commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability

act-sch-1-sec-209-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 209 Application

21 Paragraph 73(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.13
note: Omit specific phrase from text
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

210 After paragraph (ya) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.61
note: DPP must apply for order under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-210-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-210
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to apply for order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-210-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 210 After paragraph (ya) of Schedule 1

211 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.61
note: Commencement of amendment
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-211-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-211
schema version: 2

212 Paragraph 142(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.61
note: Insertion of '(other than an encumbrance in which the person referred to paragraph (1)(a) has an interest)' after 'property'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-212-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-212
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a specific phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

213 Paragraph 169(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.61
note: Insertion of a condition into the definition of property
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-213-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-213
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a condition into the definition of property
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

214 Part 4-4 (heading)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-214-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-214
schema version: 2

215 Paragraph 302(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.61
note: Insertion of '(other than an encumbrance in which the person who is liable to pay the amount has an interest)' after 'property'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-215-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-215
schema version: 2

216 Division 2 of Part 4-4 (heading)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
note: Repeal the heading.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-216-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-216
schema version: 2

217 Paragraph 302C(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
note: Insertion of a specific condition into the definition of property.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-217-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-217-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-217
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-217-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a new clause into an existing definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

218 Paragraph 307(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
note: Insertion of '(other than an encumbrance in which the person convicted of the offence has an interest)' after 'property'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-218-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-218-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-218
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-218-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a specific phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

219 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
note: Application of certain sections of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to charges created on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-219-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219
schema version: 2

22 Paragraphs 73(1)(c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.13
note: Court must satisfy conditions before forfeiting property
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Application to confirm or vary order may be made by DPP.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make application
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must satisfy conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Paragraphs 73(1)(c), (d) and (e)

220 After section 315
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-220-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-220
schema version: 2

221 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
note: Application of Section 315A to applications made on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-221-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-221
schema version: 2

23 Paragraph 73(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
note: Substitute ‘interest’ for ‘property’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Paragraphs 73(2)(b), (c) and (d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
note: Omit 'property' and substitute 'interest'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.30
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids the specified conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

25 Subsection 74(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
note: Substitute property in which the person claims an interest.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Subsection 74(1)

26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(2) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
has part: 26(3) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
has part: 26(4) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.32
note: Ceases effect when application is withdrawn or court makes a decision.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During withdrawal or decision-making
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010

act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases effect
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (No. 2) 2010

26(2) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
note: Right to apply for exclusion order after forfeiture order is made.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the right to apply for exclusion order.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

26(3) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
note: Cannot apply for exclusion order if notified but did not appear at hearing.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between notification and appearance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) was notified of the application for the *forfeiture order, but did not appear at the hearing of that application.

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of exclusion order application
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) However, unless the court gives leave...

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of individuals who appeared at hearing
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (b) appeared at the hearing of that application.

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(3) Subsections 74(2) and (3)

26(4) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
note: Court may grant leave to apply under certain conditions.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the court.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

27 Subsection 75(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
note: Omit specific phrase from legislation.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of examination under Part 3-1.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

28 Section 76
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.15
note: Omit specific examination phrase and substitute with new one.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.34
note: Conditional commencement of sections for restraining orders and forfeiture orders.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement of sections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional Commencement

29 Subdivision C of Division 5 of Part 2-2 (heading)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.15
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new heading.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Paragraph 29(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Substitute 'interest' for 'property'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Subsection 77(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.15
note: A court must make a compensation order if an applicant has an interest in property specified in the forfeiture order.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.36
note: Relevant affairs subject to examination under specified sections
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During specified sections, affairs subject to examination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Affairs relevant to affairs of a person (argumentation)
modality: Argumentation
operator: relevant_to
premise text: (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affairs relevant to the affairs of a person
modality: Deontic
operator: relevant_to
premise text: (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Affairs relevant to affairs of a person (diffusion)
modality: Diffusion
operator: relevant_to
premise text: (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During specified sections, affairs subject to examination (recurring trace)
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A court must make a compensation order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Subsection 77(1)

31 Paragraph 77(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.15
note: Insertion of phrase after 'Commonwealth'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts a phrase into text
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS

act-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Paragraph 77(2)(b)

315A Court may hear multiple applications at same time
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
note: Court may hear multiple applications at the same time.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-315a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-315a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-315a
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-315a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to hear multiple applications
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-1-sec-315a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 315A Court may hear multiple applications at same time

318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 318A(1) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(2) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(3) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(4) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(5) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(6) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a
schema version: 2

318A(1) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
note: Direct evidence by a person of a matter would be admissible in a proceeding before a court.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct evidence by a person of a matter would be admissible in a proceeding before a court.
modality: Deontic
operator: admissibility

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318A(1) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

318A(2) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
note: Statement admissible in proceedings if absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for statement admissibility.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Statement admissibility implies other parties' actions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Statement admissible if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Statement admissibility diffused to other parties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal intervals for statement admissibility.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318A(2) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

318A(3) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
note: Rules apply to evidence of statements admitted under subsection (2)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicable Allen interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: apply
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applicable CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applicable diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: apply
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Applicable linear logic
modality: LinearLogic
operator: apply
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318A(3) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

318A(4) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
note: Consider factors when evaluating the statement as evidence.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consider time intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Evaluate the statement's relevance.
modality: Argumentation
operator: consider
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Evaluate the statement's accuracy.
modality: CogAI
operator: consider
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regard is to be had to: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Evaluate the statement's weight in proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consider the absent witness's circumstances.
modality: Diffusion
operator: consider
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318A(4) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

318A(5) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
note: Evidence admissible if absent witness not called as a witness
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence admissible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Absent witness not called as a witness

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318A(5) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

318A(6) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
note: Evidence of a matter is not admissible if the absent witness denied it in cross-examination.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation for evidence admissibility
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Denial of evidence as a reason for inadmissibility
modality: Argumentation
operator: denial of evidence
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition by implication
modality: Deontic
operator: implied prohibition
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deny evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for evidence admissibility
modality: LTL
operator: interval relation
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318A(6) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at

318B Objection to admission of statements made at examination
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 318B(1) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
has part: 318B(2) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318b
schema version: 2

318B(1) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: act.pdf, p.49
note: Party must give written notice before applying for admission of statements in evidence.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 318B Objection to admission of statements made at examination

act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Party has an obligation to give written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

318B(2) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
type: Concept
description: written record
source: act.pdf, p.49
note: Notice must set out or be accompanied by a written record of specified statements.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 318B Objection to admission of statements made at examination

act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written record
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318B(2) Objection to admission of statements made at examination

32 Section 78
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.15
note: Repeal section and substitute with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.38
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

33 At the end of subsection 79(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
note: DPP need not conduct examinations until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Examinations may overlap with other application processes
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The examinations may occur concurrently with other aspects of the application process.

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to conduct examinations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The DPP must conduct examinations.

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: DPP's discretion to delay examinations
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The DPP may delay conducting examinations if necessary.

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Examinations diffuse into other application processes
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The examinations may have implications for other aspects of the application process.

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Examinations are contingent on a reasonable opportunity
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The examinations must occur after a reasonable opportunity has passed.

34 At the end of Subdivision C of Division 5 of Part 2-2
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
note: Addition of new legislation
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

35 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.17
note: Application of amended provisions to forfeiture orders
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Section 91 (simplified outline)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.17
note: Compensation is payable by the Commonwealth in certain cases.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.42
note: Financial institutions must not provide information about transactions without a monitoring order.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of providing information about transactions without a monitoring order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The payment of compensation overlaps with the temporal interval during which it is payable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between payment and compensation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If payment is made, then the Commonwealth has an obligation to pay compensation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Payment implies obligation to pay compensation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commonwealth recognizes its obligation to pay compensation in these cases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Commonwealth recognizes obligation to pay compensation
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commonwealth has an obligation to pay compensation in these cases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The payment of compensation differs from the concept of compensation itself.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Payment and compensation differ in meaning
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffersFrom
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.

37 Paragraph 92(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.17
note: Omit “the”, substitute “a”.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 Subparagraph 92(1)(b)(i)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.17
note: Insert 'under section 17 or 18' after 'order'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

act-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Subparagraph 92(1)(b)(i)

39 Paragraph 92(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.18
note: Substitute ‘conviction day’ for ‘day of the conviction’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

39A Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 39A(1) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
has part: 39A(2) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39a
schema version: 2

39A(1) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.45
note: No exemption from sworn statements under certain conditions
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 39A Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39A(1) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply

39A(2) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.45
note: Exemptions from privilege against self-incrimination
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 39A Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide sworn statement in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) However, in the case of a natural person...

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39A(2) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply

39B Application to revoke ancillary order
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.45
note: Application to revoke ancillary order
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39b
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-39b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39B Application to revoke ancillary order

4 Subsection 29(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Replace 'specified' with 'a specified interest in'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 After section 92
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.18
note: Insert clause after section 92
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

40(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Application must be made within 14 days after notification of ancillary order.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...14 days after the person was notified of the ancillary order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application timeframe is a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The application must be made within...

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...within 14 days after the person was notified of the ancillary order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The application must be made...

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

40(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: written notice and grounds for revocation
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Notice must be given to entitled persons
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

40(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Stay of ancillary order effect until court determines application.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

40(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Court may revoke ancillary order on application.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

40(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Court may consider appropriate matter in determining application.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

40(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.46
note: Court may vary ancillary order to extend period if appropriate.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...vary the order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May vary order
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (7) If...

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

41 Paragraph 93(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.18
note: Omit “day of”, substitute ‘*conviction day for’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Paragraph 93(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.18
note: Applicant must apply to court under certain sections
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Paragraph 93(1)(b)

43 Paragraph 93(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute specific section numbers
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Subsection 93(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute 'conviction day for' in the phrase 'day of'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
schema version: 2

44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.50
note: Object to specified statements being admitted in evidence
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits admitting statements in evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.50
note: Court may extend period before proceeding is heard or by agreement between parties.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: true
source: act.pdf, p.50
note: Must provide objection notice and record to court upon receiving an objection notice.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provide objection notice and record to court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Receiving an objection notice

44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.50
note: Court may determine objections before or after hearing.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to determine objections.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.50
note: Other party cannot object to statement being admitted in evidence unless objected to or given leave.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot object to the statement being so admitted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on objecting
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Other party has not objected to the statement being so admitted.

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to modify text
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

45 Subsection 93(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute specific section numbers.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 Subsection 93(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute “*conviction day for” in “day of”.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
schema version: 2

47 Subsection 93(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute specific section numbers
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 At the end of section 93
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Provide written notice to persons with an interest in forfeited property
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-48-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

48 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

49 Subsection 94(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute 'a restraining' for 'the restraining'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 Paragraphs 29(2)(a), (b), (c) and (d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Substitute 'interest' for 'property'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace 'property' with 'interest'
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

50 Subsection 94(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Omit ‘may’, substitute ‘must’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘must’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Omit ‘may’

51 Paragraphs 94(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.19
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new schedule
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

52 Paragraph 94(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Replace 'the person' with 'a person'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

53 Paragraph 94(1)(e)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Insertion of phrase in property definition
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

54 Paragraph 94(1)(f)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Substitute 'applicant's' for 'defendant's'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.60
note: No specific obligation or prohibition stated
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Paragraph 94(1)(f)

55 At the end of subsection 94(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: DPP need not conduct examinations until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-55-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to conduct examinations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The DPP must conduct examinations.

56 At the end of section 94
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Application must not be heard until DPP has had a reasonable opportunity to conduct examinations.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

56 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Examinations must occur during application hearing
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During

act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

57 After section 94
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

58 Subsection 102(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: Omit “(1)”.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

59 Subsection 102(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: Omit “may”, substitute “must”.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘must’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Omit ‘may’

6 Subsection 29(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Insertion of 'a specified interest in' before 'property'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

60 Paragraph 102(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: The court must be satisfied that the applicant had an interest in the property before forfeiture, and the interest was lawfully acquired.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The applicant's interest in the property was acquired before the forfeiture
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: the applicant had an interest in the property before the forfeiture of the property

act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and the interest was lawfully acquired
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court must be satisfied
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The applicant had an interest in the property before forfeiture

act-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Paragraph 102(1)(b)

61 Subparagraph 102(1)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.22
note: Omit specific phrase from legislation
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omit original phrase
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Commonwealth from using certain language
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Substitute phrase with new one

62 Subsections 102(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.23
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

63 Section 104
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.23
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

64 Paragraph 106(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.24
note: Modify subsection 102(d)(i)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-64-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

65 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-65-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

66 Paragraph 333(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.24
note: Omit specific phrase from conviction sentence.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting the specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

67 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.24
note: Applicability of paragraph 333(1)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct occurring before, on or after the commencement is within the applicability of paragraph 333(1)(a)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between applicability and conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: The conduct constituting the offence concerned occurred or occurs before, on or after that commencement

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Paragraph 333(1)(a) applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply the provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: The court passes sentence on or after the commencement of this item

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to apply paragraph 333(1)(a)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply the provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The court passes sentence on or after the commencement of this item

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace from the commencement to the conduct occurring before, on or after that commencement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of applicability
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: The court passes sentence on or after the commencement of this item

act-sch-1-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67 Application

68 Subparagraph 121(4)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Insertion of 'or property suspected of being subject to the effective control of the person'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Subparagraph 121(4)(a)(i)

69 Paragraph 122(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Omit all words after 'control' and substitute with 'of the person or another person'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

7 Paragraphs 29(3)(a) and (d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Replace 'property' with 'interest'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace 'property' with 'interest'
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

70 Paragraph 122(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Omit words after 'provided' and substitute with 'to the person or another person'.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Paragraph 124(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Insert 'and the other unlawful activity'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of new clause
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

act-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71 Paragraph 124(1)(c)

72 Paragraph 124(5)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Insertion of 'or property that is suspected of being subject to the effective control of the person'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 Paragraph 124(5)(a)

73 Section 130
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Omit 'offence' and substitute 'unlawful activity'.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

74 Paragraph 130(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Omit 'offence', substitute 'unlawful activity'.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-74-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

75 Subsection 133(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Modify subsections (2) and (3)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-75-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

76 After subsection 133(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.25
note: Inserts Schedule 1: Proceeds of crime
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-76-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

77 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.26
note: Division 2 of Part 2-4 applies to pecuniary penalty orders applied on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division applies to pecuniary penalty orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

act-sch-1-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77 Application

78 Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Application for compensation orders
has part: 78(2) Application for compensation orders
has part: 78(3) Application for compensation orders
has part: 78(4) Application for compensation orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

78 At the end of section 134
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.26
note: Court may allow late application for pecuniary penalty order in interests of justice.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-78-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits late application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: None

78(1) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
note: Application for compensation order if forfeiture order is pending
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for compensation order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(1) Application for compensation orders

78(2) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
note: Right to apply for compensation order after forfeiture
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the right to apply for compensation order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

78(3) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
note: Cannot apply under subsection (2) if notified of application for forfeiture order
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on applying under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot apply under subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Notification of application for forfeiture order

78(4) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.16
note: Court may grant leave to apply for compensation order under certain conditions.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the court.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(4) Application for compensation orders

79 Subsection 136(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.27
note: Omit specified text.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified text.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

79A When an application can be heard
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.17
note: Application for compensation order cannot be heard until DPP has conducted examinations.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79a
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-79a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of hearing application until DPP has conducted examinations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8 Subsection 29(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Insertion of phrase in subsection 29(4)
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

80 Subsections 136(3) and (4)
type: Concept
description: true
source: act.pdf, p.27
note: Must provide affidavit copy to subject within reasonable time
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-80-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide affidavit copy to subject within reasonable time
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

81 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.27
note: Division 3 of Part 2-4 applies to applications made on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-81-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
schema version: 2

82 Subsection 146(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.27
note: Discharge of pecuniary penalty order upon quashing conviction and non-application to confirm or vary
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-82-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order discharged
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: Discharge
premise text: Quashing conviction

act-sch-1-sec-82-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82 Subsection 146(1)

83 Subsection 146(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.27
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-83-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

84 After subsection 146(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.27
note: Inserts Schedule 1: Proceeds of crime
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-84-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interval unspecified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval not specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: No temporal relation defined

85 Subsection 146(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Discharge pecuniary penalty order under certain conditions.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-85-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the order does not relate to any other offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
premise text: (a) the person’s conviction of the offence is subsequently *quashed;

act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the offence is not a *serious offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
premise text: (b) the order does not relate to any other offence;

act-sch-1-sec-85-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85 Subsection 146(3)

86 Section 147 (including the note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Insert 'or variation' after 'confirmation' in section 147 heading.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-86-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
schema version: 2

87 Subsection 148(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Insertion of 'or variation' after 'confirmation'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-87-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
schema version: 2

88 Subparagraph 148(2)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Omit 'the offence', substitute 'any of the offences to which the order relates'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-88-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
schema version: 2

89 Subparagraph 148(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Omit “that offence”, substitute ‘any of those offences’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-89-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
schema version: 2

9 Paragraph 29(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.11
note: Omit “owns the property”, substitute ‘has the interest’.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

90 Paragraph 148(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Substitute 'such a conviction' for 'the conviction'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-90-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

91 After section 149
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.28
note: Inserts ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-91-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
schema version: 2

92 Subsection 150(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.29
note: Insertion of text after section 149A
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Text insertion obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

92A Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92A(1) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
has part: 92A(2) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92a
schema version: 2

92A(1) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.18
note: Provide written notice to person with interest in property before forfeiture.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.

act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

92A(2) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.18
note: No notice required if application for extension order or other applications made
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92A Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.

act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No notice required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: DPP need not give notice

93 Subsection 150(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.29
note: Insert 'or vary' after 'confirm'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-93-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Text 'or vary' inserted after 'confirm'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
premise text: Text to be inserted

94 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.29
note: Division 5 of Part 2-4 applies to convictions quashed on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
schema version: 2

94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 94A(1) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(2) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(3) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(4) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(5) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a
schema version: 2

94A(1) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Court must make an order if applicant has interest in property covered by restraining order and meets certain conditions.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) the court is satisfied that a proportion of the value of the applicant’s interest was not derived or realised...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Proportion of value not derived or realised from commission of offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: the court is satisfied that a proportion of the value of the applicant’s interest was not derived or realised, directly or indirectly, from the commission of any offence;

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must make an order that complies with subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make order if conditions met.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The court that made a *restraining order referred to in paragraph 92(1)(b) must...

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) a person (the applicant) has applied for an order under this section;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure conditions met.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ...must make an order that complies with subsection (2).

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) the court is satisfied that the applicant has an *interest in property covered, or that was at any time covered, by the restraining order;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Multiple conditions must be met.
modality: LTL
operator: AND
premise text: the applicant has an *interest in property covered, or that was at any time covered, by the restraining order;

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(1) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

94A(2) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Court must specify proportion and direct Commonwealth to dispose of property and pay applicant.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must specify proportion
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(2) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

94A(3) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Claimant may apply for order under section at any time.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Claimant has the right to apply for order under section.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(3) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

94A(4) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Court leave required to apply for compensation after forfeiture.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between notice and application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of individuals based on their relationship with the property.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must give leave to apply for compensation after forfeiture.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about notice and application.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of notice and application.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(4) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

94A(5) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.20
note: Court may give leave to apply if satisfied with good reason for not applying before forfeiture.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting leave is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94A(5) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or

95 Paragraph 335(6)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.30
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with specific orders
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-95-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of certain orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

96 Paragraph 335(6)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.30
note: Insertion of '(the convicting magistrate)' after 'magistrate'
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-96-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
schema version: 2

97 Subsection 335(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.30
note: Substitute magistrate with same court as convicting magistrate.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-97-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-97
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Substitution obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-1-sec-97-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 97 Subsection 335(6)

98 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.30
note: Application of subsection 335(6) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to persons convicted before or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-98-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-98-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-98
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-98-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The subsection applies to the persons.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of a rule to persons
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: Subsection 335(6) applies in relation to persons convicted before or after commencement.

act-sch-1-sec-98-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98 Application

99 Paragraph 180(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.31
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a person who is a suspect in relation to the restraining order.
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-99-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-99
schema version: 2

act-sch-1-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits a person from being a suspect in relation to the restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Subparagraph 199(9)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.144
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Subsection 8(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Omit or substitute specific clause
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-10
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

11 Subsection 5A(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Omit specific clause
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-11
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

12 Subsection 18(5) (definition of offence against this
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Substitute specific offence definitions
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Subsection 20(6) (definition of offence against Division 1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Omit 'or 11.2', substitute '11.2 or 11.2A'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 29(5) (definition of offence against this Part)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Substitute clause in definition of offence against this Part
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-14
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

140 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-140-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-140
schema version: 2

142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.148
note: Reference to another Act
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-142-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-142
schema version: 2

15 Paragraph 30(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Substitute clause in Schedule 10
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-15
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace clause with new one
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

16 Paragraph 31(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.146
note: Omit 'or 11.2', substitute ', 11.2 or 11.2A'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 Paragraph 16AA(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.146
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 54A(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.146
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Paragraph 87AA(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.146
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Subparagraph 75(c)(i)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.144
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 After subsection 61B(8)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.146
note: A person convicted of an offence against this Act is taken to have been convicted of an ancillary offence.
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-20-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-20
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

act-sch-10-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 After subsection 61B(8)

21 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of offence
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.146
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-21-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-21
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

22 Paragraph 225(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.147
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Subsection 99A(9)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.147
note: Insertion of new subsection
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Section 338 (paragraph (g) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.147
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Subparagraph 56(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.147
note: Omit 'or 11.2', substitute ', 11.2 or 11.2A'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 62(14)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.147
note: Insertion of new subsection
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 Paragraph 1224AB(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.147
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Paragraph 228(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.147
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Subsection 66(8)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.148
note: Insertion of new subsection
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Paragraph 188(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.144
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal insertion of text
modality: AllenInterval
operator: insertion
premise text: Temporal interval with start at '11.2' and end at '11.2A'

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in definition hierarchy through CogAI
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI insertion of text
modality: CogAI
operator: insertion
premise text: Definition hierarchy with '11.2' and '11.2A'

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
premise text: Text to be inserted

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in definition hierarchy through diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of text through definition hierarchy
modality: Diffusion
operator: insertion
premise text: Definition hierarchy with '11.2' and '11.2A'

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in temporal interval with LTL
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal insertion of text with LTL
modality: LTL
operator: insertion
premise text: Temporal interval with start at '11.2' and end at '11.2A'

30 Subsection 150(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.148
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-30-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-30
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

31 Subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.148
note: Insertion of new subsection
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-31
schema version: 2

4 Subparagraph 47(9)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.144
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Paragraph 496-20(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.144
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-5
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a new section
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

act-sch-10-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Paragraph 496-20(1)(a)

6 Paragraph 1042F(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.144
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Paragraph 50AA(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Omit specific clause
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-7
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause not present
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Clause omitted

8 Subsection 50AA(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Insertion of new subsection
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-8
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a new element
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

9 Subsection 10(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.145
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-10-sec-9
schema version: 2

act-sch-10-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Subsection 10(1)

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.7
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal commencement

1 January 2010
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: References Vict. Gazette No. G50 p3215
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 16(7) (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.149
note: Repeal of paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of offence against this Act
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-1-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between repeal and substitution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: Repeal paragraphs (a) and (b)

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Update knowledge graph with substitution
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph update
premise text: Substitution of sections 6 and 11.1-11.5

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of offence against this Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of repeal of paragraphs (a) and (b)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Repeal

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of substitution to related sections
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: Substitution of sections 6 and 11.1-11.5

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between repeal and substitution
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Repeal paragraphs (a) and (b)

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 6 items 1 and 2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Paragraph 78(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.151
note: Repeal paragraph 78(1)(d) and substitute with new provision
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: Commences immediately after subsection 369(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 of Victoria.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.149
note: Reference to section 4 of the Criminal Code
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation between sections 11 and 4
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections of the Criminal Code
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: Section 11 is before section 4 in the Criminal Code

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inferential relationship between sections 11 and 4
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inferential relationship between sections of the Criminal Code
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
premise text: Section 11 is part of the Criminal Code, which includes section 4

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Knowledge representation for section 11
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for sections of the Criminal Code
modality: CogAI
operator: knowledge representation
premise text: Section 11 is a part of the Criminal Code, which can be represented as knowledge

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to comply with section 4
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Referential obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: reference
premise text: Section 4 of the Criminal Code

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information flow from section 4 to section 11
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information flow from section 4 to section 11 in the Criminal Code
modality: Diffusion
operator: information flow
premise text: Section 4 of the Criminal Code refers to section 11

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.150
note: Reference to section of Criminal Code
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-3
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.150
note: Reference to Criminal Code section 4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section refers to section 4 of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: References a provision
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to
premise text: The Criminal Code contains section 4.

11 Subsection 189(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.151
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with reference to section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-5
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of reference to ancillary offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Reference to ancillary offence

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.153
note: Reference to Criminal Code section 4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-6
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-11-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to comply with Criminal Code section 4
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Referential obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: reference
premise text: Criminal Code section 4

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.155
note: Reference to section of Criminal Code
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-7
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-11-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Section 11

12 Section 12
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Subsection 23DA(1) (subparagraphs (c)(i) and (ii) of the
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.152
note: Repeal of subparagraphs and substitution with other sections
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

13 Section 13
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.10
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-13
schema version: 2

13 Paragraphs 378(7)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.152
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new offences
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-13-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-13-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraphs
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-11-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

14 Paragraph 65(9)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.152
note: Repeal of certain provisions and substitution with new references.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-14
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of specific offenses.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

144 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.150
note: Amendment of Crimes Act 1914
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-144-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-144
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-144-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

146 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.152
note: Prohibition on committing certain crimes under this Act or the regulations.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-146-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-146
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing certain crimes.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-148-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-148
schema version: 2

15 Subsection 76(9)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.153
note: Repeal subsection, substitute reference to certain offences against other sections.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-15
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a subclass of offences under section 74 or 75.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

act-sch-11-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Subsection 76(9)

152 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.158
note: Commencement information for provisions of the Act.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-152-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-152
schema version: 2

16 Subsection 3(7)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.153
note: Omit certain references in the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-16-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-16
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain references
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

17 Subsection 4(1) (definition of offence against this Act)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.153
note: Defines an offence against this Act, including offences from the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-17
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a set of offences
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Replaces the definition with a new one
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

act-sch-11-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Subsection 4(1) (definition of offence against this Act)

18 Paragraphs 32(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.154
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new offences against sections 6 and 11.1-11.5 of the Criminal Code.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-18-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-18
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on paragraphs
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

19 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-19
schema version: 2

19 May 2010
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19 May 2010
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.8
note: Commencement information
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-3
schema version: 2

19 March 2010
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-4
schema version: 2

19 Paragraphs 33(5)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.154
note: Repeal certain paragraphs and substitute with new offences.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-5
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraphs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.157
note: See s. 2(1)
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-6
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement provision
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of Schedule 1 items 1 to 213 depends on two events.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.8
note: Commencement information
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 225(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.149
note: Omit specific references from the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific references.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.7
note: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 February 2010
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.158
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act (No. 2) 2010
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-10
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-20-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to amend the provision
modality: Deontic
operator: amend

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-3
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-4
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-5
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: Applicable duty
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-6
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (a)

act-sch-11-sec-20-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 February

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-7
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.10
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-8
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 8J(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.154
note: Replace reference to offence against subsection 8K(1) or (1B) or 8L(1) or (1A) with reference to section 11.1 of the Criminal Code that relates to an offence against subsection 8K(1) or (1B) or 8L(1) or (1A).
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-9
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 8J(8)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.154
note: Omit section 7 of the Crimes Act 1914, substitute section 11.1 of the Criminal Code
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-21-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-21
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on section 7 of the Crimes Act 1914
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit

22 Subsection 32(8)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.154
note: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.157
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 and sections 11.2, 11.4, and 11.5 of the Criminal Code.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to an offence:

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the relevance of certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code to this Act.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to an offence:

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with a new provision that includes references to these offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8)

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code as relevant to this Act.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: References to an offence against this Act include a reference to an offence:

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads reference to an offence against this Act to include references to certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to an offence:

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring reference to an offence against this Act includes a reference to an offence:
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: References to an offence against this Act include a reference to an offence:

23 Subsection 79(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.155
note: Omit certain sections of the Criminal Code
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-23-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-23
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified sections of the Criminal Code
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

24 Section 4 (definition of offence against this Act)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.155
note: Definition of offence against this Act
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-24
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Section 4 (definition of offence against this Act)

25 Section 3 (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.155
note: Repeal paragraphs, substitute with sections from other Acts
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-25
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing paragraphs with new ones
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.8
note: Conditional commencement of provision(s)
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.10
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in a Schedule
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 3(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.149
note: Omit certain references in the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain references
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-11-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.8
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1 item 215
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.10
note: Commencement information
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4 Regulations
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4(1) Regulations
has part: 4(2) Regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-3
schema version: 2

4(1) Regulations
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.10
note: Regulations may be prescribed by the Governor-General.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Regulations

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...giving effect to this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Regulations are in effect during the carrying out of the Act.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The Governor-General may make regulations...

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...prescribing matters: (a) required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Regulations prescribe matters required or permitted by the Act.
modality: Argumentation
operator: prescribes
premise text: (1) The Governor-General may make regulations...

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General has obligation to prescribe regulations.
modality: Deontic
operator: may prescribe

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Regulations diffuse the requirements of the Act.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) The Governor-General may make regulations...

4(2) Regulations
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.10
note: Regulations may be made prescribing matters of a transitional nature.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Regulations

4 Subsection 3(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.149
note: Omit specified references to repealed provisions of the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-4-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified references.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.158
note: Commencement of item 182 of Schedule 1 to the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act (No. 2) 2010
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-5
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.8
note: Conditional commencement of provision(s)
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 15B(1B)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.150
note: Omit specific phrase from section 5(1B)
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Section 51 (definition of offence against this Part)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.150
note: Defines what constitutes an offence against this Part.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-6-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Section 51 (definition of offence against this Part)

act-sch-11-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The event mentioned in paragraph (b) must occur

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Paragraph 108(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.150
note: Omit specified sections or subsections from the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified sections or subsections
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-11-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A specific point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
note: Schedule 5
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 4(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.150
note: Omit certain references in the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain references
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

9 Section 9
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-9
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 16(2) (paragraph (d) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.151
note: Repeal of paragraph (d) and substitution with new definition of offence
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-9-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-9-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-11-sec-9-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-11-sec-9-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New definition of offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of the repealed paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Repeal of paragraph (d)

1 Subsection 3C(1) (definition of magistrate)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Definition of magistrate
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Sections 3ZV and 3ZW
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.72
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.72
note: Amendments apply to things seized or documents produced before, on, or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: commencement of this Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap for application scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: before, on or after commencement of this Part

act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: apply in relation to things seized or documents produced
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Amendments made by this Part

act-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Application

12 Subparagraph 3K(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.73
note: Grant permission for executing officer or constable to assist suspects on reasonable grounds.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

act-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Subparagraph 3K(2)(a)(ii)

13 After subsection 3K(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.73
note: Executing officer need not comply with certain conditions under reasonable grounds.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reasonable grounds exist during certain time intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist if the condition is met during a specific time interval

act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Executing officer need not comply if reasonable grounds exist
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Executing officer has an obligation to comply with certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Executing officer is required to comply with paragraph (3)(a) or (b)

act-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 After subsection 3K(3)

14 Subsections 3K(3A) and (3B)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.73
note: Omit '72 hours', substitute '14 days'
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 After subsection 3K(3C)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.73
note: A single extension cannot exceed 7 days.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits extensions exceeding 7 days
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

act-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 After subsection 3K(3C)

16 Subsection 3L(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.73
note: Executing officer or constable may operate electronic equipment to access data at warrant premises.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Electronic equipment operation is allowed during warrant execution.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During

act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subsection 3L(1)

17 Subsection 3L(1A)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Omit specific phrase from data access clause
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

18 Paragraphs 3L(1A)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Omit specific text from data accessed by electronic equipment
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Subsection 3L(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Omit “believes”, substitute ‘suspects’.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Section 3CA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Omit '3ZW' and substitute '3ZQZ'
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Section 3LA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Section 3LA
has part: 20(2) Section 3LA
has part: 20(3) Section 3LA
has part: 20(4) Section 3LA
has part: 20(5) Section 3LA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

20(1) Section 3LA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Executing officer or constable may operate electronic equipment to access data.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Section 3LA

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1) Section 3LA

20(2) Section 3LA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Permission to copy data accessed by operating electronic equipment
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Section 3LA

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Section 3LA

20(3) Section 3LA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Remove and destroy data from Australian Federal Police control
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Section 3LA

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the destruction of any other reproduction...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of data retention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) If the Commissioner is satisfied...

20(4) Section 3LA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Permit search and seizure of equipment under warrant.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Section 3LA

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to search and seize equipment.
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(4) Section 3LA

20(5) Section 3LA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
note: Seizure of equipment under certain conditions.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Section 3LA

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...only if: (a) it is not practicable to copy the data...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...only if: (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes seizure conditions in occupants.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...only if: (a) it is not practicable to copy the data...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits seizure without specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...only if: (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses seizure conditions to occupants.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...only if: (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for seizure.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(5) Section 3LA

21 Paragraph 3LB(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.77
note: Inserts 'or 3LAA(1)' after subsection 3L(1)
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Paragraph 3LB(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.77
note: Inserts additional clause into subsection 3L(1A) or (2)
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Section 3M
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.77
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Paragraph 3N(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.78
note: Insertion of section reference
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.78
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

3 Subsection 3F(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

3LA Person with knowledge of a computer or a computer system to
type: Concept
description: reasonable and necessary information or assistance
source: act.pdf, p.75
note: A constable may apply to a magistrate for an order requiring a specified person to provide information or assistance.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3la-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3la-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3la
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-3la-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information or assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-2-sec-3la-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3LA Person with knowledge of a computer or a computer system to

3M Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.77
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3M(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
has part: 3M(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3m
schema version: 2

3M(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.77
note: Compensation for damage to electronic equipment when insufficient care is exercised in selecting or operating the equipment.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3M Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compensation is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for damage caused by insufficient care.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) and (b)

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3M(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

3M(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.77
note: The Commonwealth must pay reasonable compensation for damage to electronic equipment.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3M Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3M(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

3ZW Delegation by Commissioner
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.72
note: Delegation of powers by Commissioner
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3zw-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3zw
schema version: 2

4 Paragraph 3L(1B)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with condition for data no longer required.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Paragraph 3L(1B)(b)

5 Subsections 3UF(4) to (7)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

58 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.64
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 3UF(9)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.66
note: Preventing, investigating or prosecuting an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Preventing, investigating or prosecuting an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) preventing, investigating or prosecuting an offence against a law of a State or Territory;

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Proceedings under a corresponding law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) proceedings under a corresponding law (within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 or the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002);

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forfeiture of the thing under a law of a State or Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (e) proceedings for the forfeiture of the thing under a law of a State or Territory;

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Deciding whether to institute proceedings or to take any other action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (f) deciding whether to institute proceedings or to take any other action mentioned in any of paragraphs (1)(a) to (l), inclusive, subsection (2) or (3) or paragraph (c), (d) or (e) of this subsection.

62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
schema version: 2

62(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.68
note: Return seized items to rightful owner or person from whom they were seized. Return seized items to rightful owner or person within 60 days
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commissioner to return seized items.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Return item to rightful owner or person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return seized items
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Commissioner's satisfaction

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

62(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.68
note: The Commonwealth must pay reasonable compensation for damage or corruption. Commissioner does not have to take steps if proceedings are instituted before end of 60 days or thing is retained due to an order under section 3ZQZ. Commissioner does not have to take steps if thing may be retained, destroyed or disposed of under a law or court order.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay reasonable compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner does not have to take steps
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from taking steps
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: Proceedings instituted before end of 60 days

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner does not have to take steps
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from taking steps due to retention order
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: Thing is retained because of an order under section 3ZQZ

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner does not have to take steps
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from taking steps due to other circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: Other circumstances

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

62(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.68
note: Owner/user may seek compensation from Commonwealth if agreement fails.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

62(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.68
note: Occupier must provide warning or guidance on equipment operation.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Occupier has an obligation to provide warning or guidance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

62(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.68
note: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

62(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.68
note: Defines damage in relation to data for the purpose of subsection (1)
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes the concept of damage in relation to data
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 64(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 64(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 64(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
schema version: 2

64(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.70
note: Commissioner may apply for retention of seized thing Commissioner may apply to a magistrate for an order in relation to the thing. Commissioner must return a thing seized under Division 3A if owner requests its return.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to retain seized thing
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return a thing seized under Division 3A.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

64(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.70
note: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard in determining an application by the Commissioner. Commissioner does not have to take steps if certain conditions are met. Magistrate may order retention of thing for specified period.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the thing is likely to be used by the owner or another person in the commission of a terrorist act, a terrorism offence or a serious offence;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner exempt from taking steps if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The Commissioner does not have to take those steps if...

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the thing is being used, or is required to be used, for a purpose mentioned in section 3ZQU or for other judicial or administrative review proceedings;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner exempt from taking steps if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The Commissioner does not have to take those steps if...

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to retain thing.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

64(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.70
note: Magistrate may order retention of thing for specified period. Commissioner must notify persons with interest in thing before making application. Return of seized thing within 90 days
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner within 90 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time interval for return request
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >P
premise text: If subsection 3UF(2) applied in relation to the thing so that a seizure notice was not served—within 90 days after the day on which the thing was seized.

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to retain thing.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner must perform actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return seized thing
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The owner requests the return of the thing.

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must apply to a magistrate for an order under section 3ZQZB.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to apply for magistrate order if not returned
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) The thing has not been returned to the owner by the end of the 90th day;

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return thing if requested
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) The owner of a thing requests the return of the thing:

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner within 90 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Time interval for return request
modality: LTL
operator: >P
premise text: (i) within 90 days after the date of the seizure notice served under section 3UF in relation to the thing; or (ii) if subsection 3UF(2) applied in relation to the thing so that a seizure notice was not served—within 90 days after the day on which the thing was seized.

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

64(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.70
note: Magistrate may permit a thing seized under Division 3A to be retained, forfeited etc. Return of thing suspected to be used in commission of crime is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between seizure and retention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (seizure under Division 3A) (retention)

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 66(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
schema version: 2

66(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.72
note: Magistrate must order thing be returned to owner if not satisfied.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must order thing be returned to owner.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

66(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.72
note: Definition of terrorist act
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: terrorist act has the same meaning as in subsection 100.1(1) of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: None

68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
schema version: 2

7 Section 3UG
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal a section
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

act-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL

70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 70(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 70(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
schema version: 2

70(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.76
note: Grant order if certain conditions are met
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order may be granted during this time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Grant order during reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material is held in or accessible from the computer or data storage device
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate may grant the order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate can grant order if conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material is held in or accessible from the computer or data storage device

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate must grant the order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must grant order if conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate can refuse to grant the order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate can refuse to grant order if conditions are not met
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order may be granted until this condition is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Grant order until reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material is held in or accessible from the computer or data storage device
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;

70(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.76
note: Order does not have effect on or after seizure.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Order is not effective on or after seizure, but other orders can specify conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) If: ... the order does not have effect on or after the seizure.

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inferential relationship between seizure and order effectiveness.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (3) If: ... the order does not have effect on or after the seizure.

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits order from having effect on or after seizure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) If: ... the order does not have effect on or after the seizure.

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses application for another order under this section relating to computer or data storage device.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) If: ... An application for another order under this section relating to the computer or data storage device may be made after the seizure.

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates application for another order under this section relating to computer or data storage device.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
premise text: (3) If: ... An application for another order under this section relating to the computer or data storage device may be made after the seizure.

70(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: true
source: act.pdf, p.76
note: Specify period, place, and conditions for providing information or assistance.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specification of period, place, and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.76
note: Failure to comply with an order is a criminal offence.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
schema version: 2

72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.78
note: Owner/user may seek compensation from Commonwealth if agreement fails.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commonwealth must provide compensation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Owner/user seeks compensation

72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.78
note: Occupier must provide warning or guidance on equipment operation.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

72(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.78
note: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

72(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.78
note: Defines damage in relation to data for the purpose of subsection (1)
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes the concept of damage in relation to data
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

8 Subsection 3UK(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Omit sections 3UF and 3UG, substitute section 3UF.
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 After Division 4B of Part IAA
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.63
note: Insert Schedule 2 Search warrants
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Section 3 (paragraph (b) of the definition of complementary
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.79
note: Substitute 'under section 3AA' for 'by the Minister by notice published in the Gazette'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace 'by the Minister by notice published in the Gazette' with 'under section 3AA'
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

act-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 3 (paragraph (b) of the definition of complementary

10 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.80
note: Definition of State participant
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State participant occurs during the commission or inquiry
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: State participant relates to a commission or inquiry under a law of a State

act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of State participant
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State participant is a subclass of participant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: State participant is a participant in relation to a State offence

act-sch-3-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Section 3

11 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.81
note: Definition of Territory participant
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Section 3

12 Section 3 (paragraph (e) of the definition of witness)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.81
note: Replace 'such a person' with 'a person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d)'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revised definition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omission of 'such a person'
modality: Deontic
operator: omission
premise text: Definition of witness

13 After section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.81
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 At the end of section 8
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Participant definition clarification
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Participant does not include a former participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clarifies participant definition
modality: Deontic
operator: clarifies
premise text: None

act-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 At the end of section 8

15 At the end of section 9
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(8) At the end of section 9
has part: 15(9) At the end of section 9
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

15(8) At the end of section 9
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Participant definition clarification
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 15 At the end of section 9

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Participant does not include a former participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clarifies participant definition
modality: Deontic
operator: clarifies
premise text: None

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(8) At the end of section 9

15(9) At the end of section 9
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Continuation of obligation after former participant ceases to be included in NWPP.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 15 At the end of section 9

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuation of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...

16 Paragraph 11(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Insert 'for each new identity' after 'name'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-16-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to insert
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
premise text: Text to be inserted

act-sch-3-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Paragraph 11(3)(b)

17 Paragraph 11(3)(e)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new date for former participants.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Paragraph 11(5)(d)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Omit section 19(2) and substitute with section 19(6)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 At the end of section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Excludes a person from being considered a former participant due to subsection 13(6)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes a person from being considered a former participant
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude

act-sch-3-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 At the end of section 11

2 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.79
note: Definition of current NWPP identity for a participant at a particular time.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NWPP identity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Participant identity

act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NWPP identity (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: NWPP identity (a)

act-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 2 Section 3

20 Paragraph 13(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.83
note: Permits persons in designated positions to acquire and use assumed identities.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-20-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

act-sch-3-sec-20-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Paragraph 13(2)(b)

21 Paragraph 13(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.83
note: Replace phrase with alternative
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 At the end of section 13
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(5) At the end of section 13
has part: 22(6) At the end of section 13
has part: 22(7) At the end of section 13
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
has part: 22(2) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
has part: 22(3) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

22(1) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Disclosing information about an individual who is a participant in the NWPP program can result in imprisonment for 2 years.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (i) the individual has a current NWPP identity at the time the information is disclosed and the information is about...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure of information and assessment as a participant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: the individual has a current NWPP identity at the time the information is disclosed and the information is about...

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) either or both of the following apply:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of individuals as participants in the NWPP program.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: the individual is a Commonwealth participant or a Territory participant; and

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about an individual who is a participant in the NWPP program.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person discloses information about an individual; and

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information flow from disclosure to assessment as a participant.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
premise text: the person discloses information about an individual; and

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (ii) there is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is a participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure of information and assessment as a participant.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: there is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is a participant.

22(2) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Disclosing information about an individual undergoing assessment for NWPP inclusion may be an offence.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure of information may reveal individual's assessment status at that time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and NWPP assessment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Assessment for NWPP inclusion occurs at a specific time

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed if disclosure occurs
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about individuals undergoing NWPP assessment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosure of information may reveal individual's assessment status

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed if disclosure occurs repeatedly
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and NWPP assessment
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Disclosure of information may be repeated

22(3) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Disclosing information about a participant without proper clearance is an offence.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation between disclosure and risk of revealing participant status is relevant to the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and risk of revealing participant status.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: There is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is a participant if they have a current NWPP identity.

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The knowledge representation of participant status is based on the NWPP identity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of participant status.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: An individual is classified as a participant if they have a current NWPP identity.

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about a participant without proper clearance is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about a participant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosing information about an individual is an offence if the individual is a participant.

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of information about participant status is relevant to the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about participant status.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: Disclosing information about an individual is an offence if the individual is a participant.

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring trace of disclosure and compromise of security is relevant to the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and compromise of security.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: There is a risk that disclosure of the information will compromise the security of the individual.

22(5) At the end of section 13
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.83
note: Commissioner may take actions for protection of former participant or other person.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 22 At the end of section 13

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may take actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(5) At the end of section 13

22(6) At the end of section 13
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.83
note: If Commissioner takes action under subsection (5) in respect of a person other than a former participant, this Act applies to the person as if the person were a former participant.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 22 At the end of section 13

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act applies to the person as if the person were a former participant.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Commissioner takes action under subsection (5)

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(6) At the end of section 13

22(7) At the end of section 13
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: act.pdf, p.83
note: Written notice must be given to the Immigration Secretary
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 22 At the end of section 13

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Written notice must be given to the Immigration Secretary
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

22A Offences relating to State participants
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22A(1) Offences relating to State participants
has part: 22A(2) Offences relating to State participants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22a
schema version: 2

22A(1) Offences relating to State participants
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.91
note: Disclosing information about an individual who is a participant or has a current NWPP identity can be an offence.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22A Offences relating to State participants

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an overlap between disclosure and assessment as State participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disclosure and assessment as State participant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (f) if the person disclosing the information is a person other than a person referred to in subparagraph (a)(i), (ii) or (iv)—there is a risk that disclosure of the information will adversely affect the integrity of the NWPP.

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is recognition of individuals as participants or having a current NWPP identity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of individuals as participants or having a current NWPP identity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (d) the individual is a State participant;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant; or (iii) a State participant; or (iv) a Territory participant; or (v) any other person;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a spread of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (c) the individual is a participant;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (b) the person discloses information about an individual;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22A(1) Offences relating to State participants

22A(2) Offences relating to State participants
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.91
note: Committing an offence requires a person to be a Commonwealth officer or participant.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22A Offences relating to State participants

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence occurs during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Offence occurs during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence has a cognitive relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Offence has a cognitive relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence spreads during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Offence spreads during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence has a temporal relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Offence has a temporal relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22A(2) Offences relating to State participants

22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22B(1) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
has part: 22B(2) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
has part: 22B(3) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b
schema version: 2

22B(1) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosing certain information about the NWPP is an offence.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information about the NWPP.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22B(1) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP

22B(2) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosing certain information about the NWPP is an offence.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22B(2) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP

22B(3) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosure exemptions for authorised persons, complaint purposes, and integrity commissioner referrals.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation permits disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) the person has been authorised by the Commissioner to make the disclosure;

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Complaint purposes permit disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (b) the disclosure is made for the purpose of making a complaint,

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Integrity commissioner referrals permit disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (c) the disclosure is made for the purpose of referring to the Integrity Commissioner, under the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006, an allegation or information that raises a corruption issue;

22C Disclosures to courts, etc.
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22C(1) Disclosures to courts, etc.
has part: 22C(2) Disclosures to courts, etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22c
schema version: 2

22C(1) Disclosures to courts, etc.
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.96
note: Disclosures to courts and inquiries
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22C Disclosures to courts, etc.

act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 22, 22A and 22B apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable to disclosures of information
modality: Deontic
operator: applyTo
premise text: (a) a court or tribunal; or (b) a Royal Commission of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory or any other commission of inquiry.

22C(2) Disclosures to courts, etc.
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.96
note: Does not affect the operation of subsection 26(3)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22C Disclosures to courts, etc.

23 Subparagraph 14(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.83
note: Insertion of word 'original' before 'identity'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Subsection 15(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Substitute 'original identity or a former NWPP identity'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Subsection 15(5)

25 Paragraph 16(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Substitute “original identity or a former NWPP” for “former”.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

26 Paragraph 16(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Substitute 'the original identity or the former NWPP' for 'his or her former'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-26-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces a phrase with another
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

27 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New term relates to old one temporally
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between terms
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New term substitutes old one in AI context
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Substitution of terms in AI context
modality: CogAI
operator: substitution
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New term replaces old one
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replacement of terms
modality: Deontic
operator: replacement
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New term diffuses from old one
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of terms
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New term traces back to old one
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of terms
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'

27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27A(1) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
has part: 27A(2) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
has part: 27A(3) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a
schema version: 2

27A(1) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
description: Notification
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Participant must notify Commissioner of involvement in civil proceeding.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(1) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings

27A(2) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Commissioner may take action in circumstances after notification.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action taken
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to act
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Commissioner notified

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(2) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings

27A(3) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Definition of civil proceeding
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of civil proceeding
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a civil proceeding
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: civil proceeding is a class of proceedings

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(3) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings

28 Subsection 16(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Substitute 'original identity or any former NWPP' for 'former'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
has part: 28(2) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28(1) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.99
note: Disclose participant identity in court proceedings
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the fact that a person has undergone or is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP as such a participant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and assessment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclose the original identity or a former NWPP identity...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure of participant identity
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) This section applies...

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclose the fact that a person is such a participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosing participant identity
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclose the fact that a person has undergone or is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP as such a participant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosing assessment information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclose the fact that a person has undergone or is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP as such a participant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure of assessment information
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(1) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings

28(2) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.99
note: Court must hold proceedings in private and make orders to suppress publication of evidence.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission: (a) must, unless it considers that it is not in the interests of justice to do so, hold in private that part of the proceedings that relates to the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c); and

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hold proceedings in private
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission:

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make orders to suppress publication of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) must make such orders relating to the suppression of publication of evidence given before it as, in its opinion, will ensure that the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) is not made public;

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure confidentiality
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission: (a) must, unless it considers that it is not in the interests of justice to do so, hold in private that part of the proceedings that relates to the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c); and

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Two obligations combined
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission: (a) must, unless it considers that it is not in the interests of justice to do so, hold in private that part of the proceedings that relates to the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c); and (b) must make such orders relating to the suppression of publication of evidence given before it as, in its opinion, will ensure that the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) is not made public;

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(2) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings

28A Offence of contravening an order under section 28
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28A(1) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
has part: 28A(2) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28a
schema version: 2

28A(1) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.100
note: Offence of contravening an order under section 28
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28A Offence of contravening an order under section 28

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order is in force under section 28;

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits engagement in conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) the person engages in conduct;

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28A(1) Offence of contravening an order under section 28

28A(2) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.100
note: Avoids doubt on powers of the body that made the order under section 28.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28A Offence of contravening an order under section 28

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28A(2) Offence of contravening an order under section 28

29 Subsection 16(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Substitute 'current NWPP' for 'new'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.79
note: Defines former NWPP identity for a participant at a particular time.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines former NWPP identity
modality: Deontic
operator: defined

act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class of identities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedClass

30 Subsection 16(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Replace 'former' with 'original identity or any former NWPP'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
schema version: 2

31 Subsection 16(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Section 17
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Substitute 'original identity or any former NWPP identity' for 'former identity'.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Section 17

33 Subsection 18(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
note: Replace heading and note 1, insert note 2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
schema version: 2

34 Subparagraph 18(1)(b)(iv)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.85
note: Replace 'protection and assistance for the participant' with 'the participant's inclusion in the NWPP'.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-34-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace text
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace

35 Subsection 18(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.85
note: Substitute phrase in subsection 18(1)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 Subsection 18(1)

36 Subsection 18(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.85
note: Termination of NWPP protection and assistance
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-36-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits termination of NWPP protection and assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

37 After subsection 18(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.85
note: Protection and assistance must be terminated by the Commissioner if requested in writing.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-37-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must terminate the protection and assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory termination
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: The person requests in writing that the protection and assistance be terminated.

act-sch-3-sec-37-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37 After subsection 18(2)

38 Subsection 18(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection 18(3)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-38-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

39 Paragraphs 18(4)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Replace 'participant' with 'person'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-39-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace 'participant' with 'person'
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

act-sch-3-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 Paragraphs 18(4)(b) and (c)

3AA Declaration of complementary witness protection law
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.81
note: Minister may declare a law to be complementary witness protection law.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3aa
schema version: 2

3AB State offence that has a federal aspect
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.81
note: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3ab
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigated by Australian Crime Commission during the same period as the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between investigation and offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by both agencies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Combination of conditions for State offence with a federal aspect
modality: Argumentation
operator: and
premise text: Section 4AA Australian Federal Police Act 1979 and Section 4A Australian Crime Commission Act 2002

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by either agency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive processing of investigation and offence relation
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: Investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by either agency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation from investigation to offence
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3AB State offence that has a federal aspect

4 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.79
note: Definition of former participant
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

act-sch-3-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Section 3

40 Subsection 18(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Termination decision cannot be made without a person's involvement.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-40-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of termination decision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

41 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Substitute 'person's' for 'participant's'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-41
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(i)

42 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Substitute 'person' for 'participant'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(ii)

43 Paragraphs 18(5)(b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Replace 'participant' with 'person'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-43
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Paragraphs 18(5)(b), (c), (d) and (e)

44 Subsection 18(6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Written notice of termination decision must be given to Immigration Secretary
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-44-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-44
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

45 At the end of section 18
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.87
note: Participant definition exclusion
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-45-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-45
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclude former participants from the term participant
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

act-sch-3-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 At the end of section 18

46 Subsection 19(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.87
note: Restore original identity if necessary
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-46-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-46
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Action taken during NWPP identity provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Dependent on discretion of Deputy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: may

47 Subsection 19(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.87
note: Omit 'former'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-47-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to omit
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

48 Subsection 19(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.87
note: Substitute specific identity terms in subsection 19(3)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-48
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Subsection 19(3)

49 Subsections 19(5) and (6)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.87
note: Notice to participant under subsection (6) upon restoration of identity.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-49-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-49
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

5 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.79
note: Witness protection schedule
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Paragraph 20(c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Substitute current NWPP identity or current location
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-50
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50 Paragraph 20(c)

51 Section 21
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Insertion of 'or the performance or purported performance' after 'conferred'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-51
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51 Section 21

52 Section 22
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-52
schema version: 2

53 Subsection 25(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.96
note: Substitute "subsections (3) and (4)" for "subsection (3)"
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-53
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Subsection 25(1)

54 Subsection 25(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.96
note: Omit 'and 27', substitute ', 27 and 27A'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-54
schema version: 2

55 At the end of section 25
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.96
note: Delegation of Commissioner's powers and functions
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-55-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-55
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Delegation of Commissioner's powers and functions
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ranked below the Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Rank hierarchy
modality: LinearLogic
operator: <>
premise text: Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, or person occupying an equivalent or higher rank

56 Paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.97
note: Substitute Royal Commission wording
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-56
schema version: 2

57 Paragraphs 26(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.97
note: Insertion of phrase after 'duties'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-57
schema version: 2

58 After paragraph 26(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.97
note: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information about AFP employees involved in NWPP operation.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-58
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information disclosure is restricted during the operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Information disclosure is restricted during operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no AI processing of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No AI processing of information about AFP employees.
modality: CogAI
operator: none
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not divulge or communicate the information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act.

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no diffusion of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion of information about AFP employees.
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information disclosure is restricted until the operation ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Information disclosure is restricted until operation ends.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;

act-sch-3-sec-58-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58 After paragraph 26(1)(b)

59 Paragraph 26(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.97
note: Substitute specific authorities with broader terms.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-59
schema version: 2

6 Section 3
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.80
note: Defines personal information for identity purposes
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide personal info
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies personal info for identity purposes
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

act-sch-3-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Section 3

60 After paragraph 26(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.97
note: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information about AFP employees involved in NWPP operation.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-60
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure is restricted during operation of NWPP.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure is restricted during operation of NWPP.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The person has the information as a result of performance of functions or duties, or exercise of powers, in relation to this Act.

act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Divulging or communicating such information is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Performance of functions or duties, or exercise of powers, in relation to this Act.

act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition applies everywhere.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition applies everywhere.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: Performance of functions or duties, or exercise of powers, in relation to this Act.

act-sch-3-sec-60-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 After paragraph 26(2)(b)

61 Subsection 26(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Insert 'a State or a Territory' after 'Commonwealth'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-61-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-61
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of 'a State or a Territory'
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

62 Subsection 26(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Omit “or a former participant”.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-62
schema version: 2

63 Subsection 26(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Omit “or former participant”.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-63-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-63
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'or former participant'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

64 Subsection 27(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Participant must notify Commissioner if to be a witness in proceeding.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-64-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-64
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-3-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Subsection 27(1)

65 Subsection 27(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Omit “or former participant”.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-65-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-65
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'or former participant'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

66 After section 27
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Insert clause
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-66-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-66
schema version: 2

67 Section 28
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.99
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-67
schema version: 2

68 Subsection 30(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.100
note: Substitute sections 27 and 27A for section 27.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-68-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-68
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to substitute sections
modality: Deontic
operator: =

act-sch-3-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Subsection 30(1)

69 Saving provision—declarations of complementary witness
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.101
note: A declaration made under paragraph (b) of the definition of complementary witness protection law is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-69
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Saving provision—declarations of complementary witness

7 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.80
note: Defines original identity in relation to a participant.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a descriptive clause.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

70 Application—action in respect of former participants etc.
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.101
note: Commencement of action under Witness Protection Act 1994
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Application—non-disclosure of former identity
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.101
note: Applicability of Witness Protection Act 1994 to pre-commencement permissions
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-5
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-71
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Pre-commencement permissions are affected by the Act's commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between pre-commencement and post-commencement permissions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The Act applies on and after the commencement of this item in relation to a pre-commencement permission.

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Act applies to pre-commencement permissions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: The Act applies on and after its commencement.

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to apply the Act to pre-commencement permissions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply the Act to pre-commencement permissions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Act applies on and after its commencement in relation to a pre-commencement permission.

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Pre-commencement permission is classified as such.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of post-commencement and pre-commencement permissions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Post-commencement permission means a permission given under paragraph 16(1)(b) of the Witness Protection Act 1994, as in force at the commencement of this item.

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Pre-commencement permissions are classified as such.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of post-commencement and pre-commencement permissions as such
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Pre-commencement permission means a permission given under paragraph 16(1)(b) of the Witness Protection Act 1994 before the commencement of this item.

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Act's applicability is recurring for pre-commencement permissions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring applicability of the Act to pre-commencement permissions
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: The Act applies on and after its commencement in relation to a pre-commencement permission.

act-sch-3-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71 Application—non-disclosure of former identity

74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.80
note: Definition of Immigration Secretary
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-74-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-74
schema version: 2

76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.82
note: Federal aspect applies if certain sections apply
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-76-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-76
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Federal aspect applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Either of the sections referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) were to apply.

act-sch-3-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

78 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-78
schema version: 2

8 Section 3 (definition of participant)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.80
note: Defines participant as including a former participant unless contrary intention appears.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Section 3 (definition of participant)

80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Notification
source: act.pdf, p.86
note: Deputy Commissioner must notify person of termination decision
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-80-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-80
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: must

82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 82(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-82
schema version: 2

82(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Documents related to current and former NWPP identities.
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Participant must return documents within 10 days of notice.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-82-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant must return documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

82(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.88
note: Refusal to comply with notice results in offence.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-82-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice and refusal occur at the same time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice and refusal.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The refusal is recognized as an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of refusal as offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 10 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits refusal to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The refusal diffuses across time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of refusal across time.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's refusal is recurring.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of refusal.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 84(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 84(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 84(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-84
schema version: 2

84(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.90
note: Disclosing information about an individual undergoing NWPP assessment can lead to imprisonment for 10 years.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about an individual undergoing NWPP assessment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person discloses information about an individual; and (b) the individual is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP at the time the information is disclosed;

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that could compromise the security of the individual.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) there is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is undergoing such assessment;

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that could lead to the individual being included in the NWPP.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) if the individual were included in the NWPP following that assessment, the individual would be a Commonwealth participant or a Territory participant;

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about an individual who is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the individual is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP at the time the information is disclosed;

84(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.90
note: Disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (5) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (4)

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

84(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.90
note: Absolute liability applies to certain crimes.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

84(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.90
note: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3) or (4)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to convict
modality: Deontic
operator: May

86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.92
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 86(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 86(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-86
schema version: 2

86(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.92
note: Disclosing information about a participant without proper clearance is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-86-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosure of information about a participant without proper clearance.

86(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.92
note: Disclosing information about an individual undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP can lead to security compromise or integrity of NWPP.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-86-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No disclosure allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosing information can lead to security compromise or integrity of NWPP.

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

86(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.92
note: Disclosure by a person is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-86-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88
schema version: 2

88(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.94
note: Absolute liability applies to certain crimes.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

88(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.94
note: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3) or (4)
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

9 Section 3
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.80
note: Definition of 'State offence that has a federal aspect'
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: section 3AB
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires relation
premise text: section 3AB

90 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.96
note: Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices issue is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-90
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disclosure and offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (4) To avoid doubt, a person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (2) because of a risk that a disclosure will have a particular effect even if the disclosure does not actually have that effect.

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Investigating or resolving an AFP conduct or practices issue is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (ii) investigating or resolving an AFP conduct or practices issue under Part V of that Act.

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (2) because of a risk that a disclosure will have a particular effect even if the disclosure does not actually have that effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) To avoid doubt, a person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (2) because of a risk that a disclosure will have a particular effect even if the disclosure does not actually have that effect.

act-sch-3-sec-90-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.98
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-92-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-92
schema version: 2

94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.100
note: Sec 94: Prohibition on disclosure of certain information
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-94-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-94
schema version: 2

act-sch-3-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.102
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-96-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-96
schema version: 2

1 At the end of Chapter 9 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.102
note: Addition of new section
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-100
schema version: 2

100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.106
note: Specify acts or omissions in State offences
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-100-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...having regard to the circumstances in which the offence is committed...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Expresses a temporal relation between the circumstances and the acts/omissions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the specificity of the acts or omissions involved in committing a State offence is to be determined...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify the acts or omissions involved
modality: Deontic
operator: Specificity
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the specificity of the acts or omissions involved in committing a State offence is to be determined...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits flexibility in specifying acts/omissions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the specificity of the acts or omissions involved in committing a State offence is to be determined...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on specifying acts/omissions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...whether or not those circumstances are expressed to be elements of the offence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Expresses a recurring trace between the circumstances and the acts/omissions
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

100(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.106
note: A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (2)(c) if the conduct constituting the State offence affects the interests of the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-100-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision states that a State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (2)(c)
modality: Deontic
operator: covers

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

100(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.106
note: Does not limit paragraph (2)(c)
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-100-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: (4)

102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 102(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(6A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102
schema version: 2

102(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: A person commits an offence if they associate with another person engaging in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law. Exempts conduct from punishment for related offenses within a 7-day window.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conviction occurred before the association.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the conviction and the association.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (a) the first person has previously been convicted of an offence against subsection (1); and (b) the first person associates with another person (the second person);

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if they associate with another person engaging in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not associate with another person engaging in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the first person has previously been convicted of an offence against subsection (1); and (b) the first person associates with another person (the second person);

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person is obligated not to facilitate the engagement or proposed engagement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not engage in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (d) the association facilitates the engagement or proposed engagement by the second person in the second person’s conduct;

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The association and the conduct are recurring traces.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of the association and the conduct.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (c) the second person engages, or proposes to engage, in conduct (the second person’s conduct) that constitutes, or is part of conduct constituting, an offence against any law;

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

102(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: Knowledge is a fault element for certain crimes.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires knowledge as a fault element.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge is a necessary condition for certain crimes.
modality: Epistemic
operator: knows

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

102(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: Absolute liability for certain crimes
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits absolute liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

102(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: Prosecution need not prove identity of certain persons
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution need not prove identity of certain persons
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from proof
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (2)(f)

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

102(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: No need to prove identity of persons in certain circumstances.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 2010 103
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap for crimes legislation amendment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is not necessary to prove the identity of any of the persons mentioned...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prove identity
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: No obligation to prove identity in certain circumstances.

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

102(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: Exemptions from the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exemptions and the Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of exemptions by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from the obligation to comply with the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The Act does not apply to an association if...

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of exemptions through the Act
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating pattern of exemptions and the Act
modality: LTL
operator: repeats
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

102(6A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: Limits on paragraph (6)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the scope of paragraph (6)
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(6A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

102(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: Prohibition on conviction of certain offences
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids conviction of certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (7) A person who is convicted of an offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

102(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.108
note: Exemption from application of section due to infringement on constitutional doctrine
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemption applies during infringement on constitutional doctrine
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exemption applies during infringement on constitutional doctrine
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from application of section due to infringement on constitutional doctrine
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Section does not apply to the extent it would infringe any constitutional doctrine

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exemption spreads to all cases where infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exemption applies during infringement on constitutional doctrine
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies

104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 104(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 104(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-104
schema version: 2

104(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (f).
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

104(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
note: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (1) if providing support or resources aids the organisation.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conviction possible
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May be convicted
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Providing support or resources aids the organisation

act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 106(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 106(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-106
schema version: 2

106(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: Conviction not required for underlying offence discharge
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-106-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conviction not required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to convict
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 19B discharge order

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

106(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: No prosecution for conduct already punished abroad.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-106-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No prosecution for that conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If convicted or acquitted of a foreign offence, cannot be prosecuted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Conviction or acquittal of a foreign offence

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

106(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: Conviction possible if organisation benefits from underlying offence
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-106-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conviction possible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to convict if organisation benefits
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Underlying offence likely to result in organisation benefits

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

108 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-108-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-108
schema version: 2

2 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.114
note: Defines federal aspect in section 390.2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

3 Application of sections 390.3, 390.4, 390.5 and 390.6 of the
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.114
note: Sections apply if conduct occurred after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if

act-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Application of sections 390.3, 390.4, 390.5 and 390.6 of the

390 Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.102
note: Defines terms used in the Division, including 'ancillary offence', 'associate', and 'child'.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390
schema version: 2

390 Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 390(1) Section 390
has part: 390(2) Section 390
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-2
schema version: 2

390(1) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.105
note: Identify State offences with a federal aspect.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies during the commencement of the Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The section applies during the commencement of the Act.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect because:

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State offences that have a federal aspect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State offence has a federal aspect.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (a) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the elements of the State offence;

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State offences with a federal aspect must be identified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State offences with a federal aspect must be identified.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect;

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies and must be complied with
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: The section applies and must be complied with.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: (1) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect because:

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(1) Section 390

390(2) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.105
note: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166 between the time it was created and now.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for the creation of the provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, a State offence has a federal aspect if...

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Conditional argumentation
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166 between the time it was created and now.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for the creation of the provision
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, a State offence has a federal aspect if...

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(2) Section 390

390 Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.107
note: Associating in support of serious organised criminal activity is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-4-sec-390-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits associating in support of serious organised criminal activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

390 Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.109
note: Providing material support or resources to a criminal organisation is an offence.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-4-sec-390-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

390 Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 390(1) Section 390
has part: 390(2) Section 390
has part: 390(3) Section 390
has part: 390(4) Section 390
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5
schema version: 2

390(1) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
note: Committing an offence against any law for the benefit of an organisation is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (f) the underlying offence is a constitutionally covered offence punishable by imprisonment for at least 12 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence for the benefit of an organisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person commits an offence against any law (the underlying offence); and

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(1) Section 390

390(2) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
note: Organisation of 2 or more persons facilitating offence against law punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 years.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Organisation has 2 or more members between which offence is facilitated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Organisation has 2 or more members between which offence is facilitated.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (c) the organisation consists of 2 or more persons; (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 390 recognises organisations with 2 or more members as facilitators of offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section 390 recognises organisations with 2 or more members as facilitators of offences.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Organisation of 2 or more persons facilitating offence against law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Organisation of 2 or more persons facilitating offence against law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (c) the organisation consists of 2 or more persons; (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Organisation diffuses engagement in conduct constituting an offence against law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Organisation diffuses engagement in conduct constituting an offence against law.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence against law is recurring trace.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Offence against law is recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (f) the underlying offence is a constitutionally covered offence punishable by imprisonment for at least 12 months;

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(2) Section 390

390(3) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
note: No fault element for physical elements of underlying offence
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) There is no fault element...

390(4) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.110
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (f) and (2)(e) and (f)
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

390 Section 390
type: Concept
description: true
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: Must provide a benefit even if not received.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-6
schema version: 2

act-sch-4-sec-390-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a benefit.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

390 Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 390(1) Section 390
has part: 390(2) Section 390
has part: 390(3) Section 390
has part: 390(4) Section 390
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7
schema version: 2

390(1) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: Directing activities of an organisation that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(1) Section 390

390(2) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 years is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is between a prohibited activity and the person committing an offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (f) the offence against any law mentioned in paragraph (b) is a constitutionally covered offence punishable by imprisonment for at least 12 months.

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is a recurring prohibited activity.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;

390(3) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (f) and (2)(e) and (f)
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)(e) and (f) and (2)(e) and (f)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (3)

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(3) Section 390

390(4) Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.112
note: Conviction possible even if activity does not aid the organisation
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to convict
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Conviction possible even if activity does not aid the organisation

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(4) Section 390

390 Section 390
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.114
note: Extended geographical jurisdiction applies to an offence against this Division.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-8
schema version: 2

act-sch-4-sec-390-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates the applicability of a rule or provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

act-sch-4-sec-390-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390 Section 390

act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Division.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defines

4 After subsection 5D(8)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.114
note: Offences against Division 390 of the Criminal Code are serious offences.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 98(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-98
schema version: 2

98(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.104
note: Relationships of close family members are defined based on the definition of child.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-98-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.104
note: Clarifies references to organisations and persons in the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act.
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-98-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

1 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.115
note: Insertion of 'against a law' into the definition of an offence.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a term
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

act-sch-5-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of

10 At the end of subsection 400.5(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 At the end of subsection 400.5(4) of the Criminal Code

11 Subsection 400.6(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(2) Section 11
has part: 11(3) Section 11
has part: 11(4) Section 11
has part: 11(5) Section 11
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2
schema version: 2

11(2) Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.120
note: Exemption from prosecution for conduct occurring in a foreign country
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to conduct occurring in a foreign country
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly in...

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A person is not guilty of an offence against this Division...

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(2) Section 11

11(3) Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.120
note: Exception provision for subsection (2) of section 11(2)
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law creating the offence must acknowledge this exception.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the law creating the offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law creating the offence may acknowledge (2) as an exception.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits the law creating the offence to acknowledge exceptions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law creating the offence must acknowledge (2) as an exception.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the law to acknowledge exceptions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offender must comply with exceptions acknowledged by the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the offender to comply with exceptions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the application of subsection 13.3(3) to an offence, (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must apply exceptions acknowledged by the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the court to apply exceptions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the application of subsection 13.3(3) to an offence, (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.

11(4) Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.120
note: A person is not guilty of an offence against this Division if certain conditions are met.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision specifies the temporal scope of the exemption.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The provision implies that certain conditions must be met for an individual to be exempt from liability.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision represents knowledge about exemptions from liability.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on individuals and bodies corporate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision propagates the exemption to individuals and bodies corporate.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation

11(5) Section 11
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.120
note: Exception provision for subsection (4) of section 11
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: exception provided by the law creating the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Taken to be an exception
modality: Deontic
operator: taken to be
premise text: (4) of this section

110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 110(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 110(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 110(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-110
schema version: 2

110(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.116
note: Circumstances must exist for sections to apply
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Circumstances exist

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

110(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.116
note: Prohibition on using money or property to facilitate serious and organised crime
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of money or property to facilitate serious and organised crime
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

110(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.116
note: Dealing with money or property under specified circumstances is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The dealing with money or property is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States that the dealing is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbidden

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The dealing with money or property occurs under specified circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies the scope of the prohibition.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

110(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.116
note: Absolute liability applies to subsections (3) and (4).
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

112 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.118
note: Dealing with money or property intended to become an instrument of crime is prohibited.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-112
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with prohibited activities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analysis of prohibited activities
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Influence on prohibited activities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of prohibited activities
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.

act-sch-5-sec-112-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.120
note: Residency requirement for alleged offence
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-114
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (No. 2) 2010 (ii) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is a resident of Australia; or
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires residency
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or

act-sch-5-sec-114-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-116
schema version: 2

116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.122
note: Section 16.1 applies in relation to an offence against this Division.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-116-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.122
note: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-116-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between Division and Part
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Overlap
premise text: Division and Part have the same temporal applicability

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application to Division and Part
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: Division and Part have the same applicability

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application to Conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: Conduct is subject to applicability

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between Division and Part
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Division and Part have the same recurring applicability

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.124
note: Prohibition on carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-118
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,

12 At the end of subsection 400.6(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 At the end of subsection 400.6(4) of the Criminal Code

120 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.126
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-120-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-120
schema version: 2

13 Subsection 400.7(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 At the end of subsection 400.7(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Prohibition on money laundering
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to prevent money laundering
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15 At the end of section 400.8 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.118
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 At the end of section 400.8 of the Criminal Code

16 Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
has part: 16(1A) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-16
schema version: 2

16(1) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.118
note: Dealing with proceeds of crime over $100,000 is an offence.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of dealing with proceeds of crime
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes a pattern in data related to proceeds of crime
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies imprisonment for 3 years or penalty units
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses into a set of agents with authority to investigate
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Holds for all temporal intervals of dealing with proceeds of crime
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code

16(1A) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.118
note: Dealing with proceeds of crime is an offence.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Dealing with proceeds of crime implies an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1A) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code

17 Subsection 400.9(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.118
note: Insertion of new provision after subsection (1)(b)
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-17
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1A)(b)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a new provision
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
premise text: (1)(b)

act-sch-5-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Subsection 400.9(2) of the Criminal Code

18 Paragraph 400.9(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.119
note: Insertion of a phrase after 'expenditure'
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-18-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-18
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

act-sch-5-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Paragraph 400.9(2)(c) of the Criminal Code

19 Subsection 400.9(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.119
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-19-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-19
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal subsection
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

2 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.115
note: Inserts 'wholly or partly' after 'that is' in the definition of proceeds of crime.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds a specific word to the definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Inserts

20 Subsection 400.9(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.119
note: Omit specific paragraph references in Criminal Code subsection 400.9(4)
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-20-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-20
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific paragraph references
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

21 Subsection 400.9(6) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.119
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-21-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-21
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal subsection
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

22 Subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.119
note: Omit “or 400.7”, substitute ‘, 400.7 or 400.9’.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-22-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-22
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Remove the specified clause
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit

23 Section 400.15 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.119
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.122
note: Amendments apply in relation to conduct engaged on or after commencement of this Part.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Section 5
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.123
note: Definition of non-financier
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-25
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a non-financier
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: non-financier means a person who is not...

act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a non-financier
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: non-financier means a person who is not...

act-sch-5-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Section 5

26 Section 5 (definition of stored value card)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.123
note: Defines stored value card, excluding debit and credit cards.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-26-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-26
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes definition of stored value card
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes new definition for stored value card
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

act-sch-5-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Section 5 (definition of stored value card)

27 Subsection 6(2) (table items 21, 22, 23 and 24)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.123
note: Replace 'stored on' with 'stored in connection with'
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-27-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-27
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replacement of words
modality: Deontic
operator: replacement
premise text: Replace 'stored on' with 'stored in connection with'

28 Subsection 6(2) (table items 31 and 32)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.123
note: Repeal items, substitute with Schedule 5 Money laundering
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.124
note: Application of amendments to designated services
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.115
note: Insertion of 'against a law' into definition of proceeds of crime
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Paragraphs 10(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.124
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with a new definition of non-financier.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-30-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-30
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the transfer of money or property under a remittance arrangement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

31 Transitional provisions for AML/CTF Rules
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.124
note: Transitional provisions for AML/CTF Rules
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Paragraph 10(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.125
note: Omit certain wording from an arrangement
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Section 46 (table items 3 and 4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.125
note: Omit 'person in Australia', substitute 'non-financier in Australia'.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-33
schema version: 2

34 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.125
note: Omit 'as soon as possible', substitute 'immediately'
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Subsection 123(3)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.125
note: Reporting entities must not disclose certain information to anyone else.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-35-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-35
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot disclose certain information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Reporting entity required to give information

36 Application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.126
note: Applicability of subsection 123(3) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-36
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for applicability is before, on or after the commencement of this item.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The provision applies to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act before, on or after the commencement of this item.

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is applicable in relation to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of a provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: The provision applies to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to apply the provision in relation to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply the provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The provision applies in relation to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for applicability is before, on or after the commencement of this item.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for applicability
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The provision applies to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act before, on or after the commencement of this item.

act-sch-5-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Application

4 Section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.115
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
schema version: 2

400 Section 400
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.115
note: Definition of dealing with money or other property
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-400
schema version: 2

400 Section 400
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.115
note: Application of offences relating to possible instruments of crime
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-400-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-400-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to sections 400.3, 400.4, 400.5
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

act-sch-5-sec-400-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400 Section 400

400 Section 400
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.115
note: Prohibition on money laundering
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-400-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-400-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits money laundering
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-5-sec-400-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400 Section 400

400 Section 400
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.119
note: Geographical jurisdiction for committing an offence against this Division
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-400-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person does not commit an offence against this Division unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part of the conduct must occur in Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly or partly
premise text: The conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly or partly in Australia

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly or partly in Australia; or wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or an Australian ship;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part of the conduct must occur on board an Australian aircraft or ship
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly or partly
premise text: (i) wholly or partly in Australia; (ii) wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or an Australian ship

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conduct must occur outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly outside
premise text: (b) the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a Commonwealth indictable offence, a State indictable offence, an Australian Capital Territory indictable offence or a Northern Territory indictable offence;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conduct must be related to a specific type of offence
modality: Deontic
operator: related to a Commonwealth indictable offence
premise text: (iii) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime; in relation to a Commonwealth indictable offence, a State indictable offence, an Australian Capital Territory indictable offence or a Northern Territory indictable offence;

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conduct must occur outside Australia and meet specific conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly outside
premise text: (c) the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400 Section 400

act-sch-5-sec-400-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is

act-sch-5-sec-400-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400 Section 400

5 Subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.116
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 At the end of subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.116
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 At the end of subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code

7 Subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 At the end of subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
schema version: 2

act-sch-5-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 At the end of subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code

9 Subsection 400.5(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.117
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 At the end of Division 6 of Part IB
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
schema version: 2

122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 122(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-122
schema version: 2

122(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
note: Court of Appeal must dismiss appeal under certain circumstances.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) Otherwise, the Court of Appeal must dismiss the appeal.

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

122(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
note: Court of Appeal may dismiss appeal if no substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

122(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
note: Court of Appeal may make orders for custody or bail of the accused if appeal is allowed.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court of Appeal overlaps with custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court of Appeal prohibits custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court of Appeal permits custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Court of Appeal diffuses information about custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Court of Appeal recurs to custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
modality: LTL
operator: Recur
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

122(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
note: Rules of court may make provision relating to appeals and proceedings.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

122(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
note: Division has effect subject to this section.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

124 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.130
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-124-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-124
schema version: 2

2 Application of section 20BI of the Crimes Act 1914
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
note: Applicability of section 20BI of the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability to findings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement of section 20BI

20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi
schema version: 2

20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.127
note: Right to appeal against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has right

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.127
note: Court of Appeal gives leave to appeal on certain grounds.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Grounds for appeal: before the trial, on appeal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between grounds for appeal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The accused may appeal...

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court of Appeal gives leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The accused may appeal...

20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.127
note: Court of Appeal must allow appeal if certain conditions are met.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the appeal if the court thinks that...(a)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Appeal is related to a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal if...

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...there was a miscarriage of justice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Appeal implies a miscarriage of justice.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal...

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the order of the Supreme Court or County Court giving effect...to the finding should be set aside...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Appeal is related to a specific type of decision.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal...

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the appeal if the court thinks...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has a duty to allow appeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must...

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the order of the Supreme Court or County Court giving effect...to the finding should be set aside...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Appeal is related to a specific type of decision.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal...

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

3 Transitional provision
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.128
note: Appeal proceedings for unfitness to plead continue to apply despite repeal of section 570C.
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relevant provisions overlap with section 570C.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Section 570A as applied by section 570C

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: Section 68 of the Judiciary Act 1903

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal does not affect provisions that were in force immediately before repeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Peremption
premise text: Paragraph (2) of the provision

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal does not affect provisions that were in force immediately before repeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: Paragraph (2) of the provision

act-sch-6-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Transitional provision

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.130
note: Definition of constable
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)

10 Paragraph 28(1A)(c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

11 Subsection 28(8)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Failure to comply with section 29A does not affect the validity of a summons.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: A

act-sch-7-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Subsection 28(8)

12 Paragraph 29(1A)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of specific words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.132
note: Failure to comply with section 29A does not affect notice validity
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-126-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-126
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to comply does not affect notice validity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section 29A has an obligation on the agent

act-sch-7-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 128(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 128(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-128
schema version: 2

128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: act.pdf, p.134
note: Must provide a copy of the certificate before or at the same time as an application is made.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-128-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the certificate before or at the same time as an application is made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

128(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.134
note: Court may deal with person as if acts or omissions constituted contempt of Court.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-128-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

128(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.134
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to contempt of the ACC.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-128-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 2 applies to contempt
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

13 Paragraph 29(1A)(c)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

130 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-130-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-130
schema version: 2

132 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-132-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-132
schema version: 2

134 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-134-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-134
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 29(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Repeal subsection and substitute with new schedule
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 At the end of subsection 29B(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.132
note: Addition of complaint purposes for Ombudsman and Australian Law Enforcement Integrity Commission.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-15
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding purposes for complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

act-sch-7-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 At the end of subsection 29B(2)

16 Paragraph 29B(4)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.132
note: Omit 'giving legal advice', substitute 'giving or obtaining legal advice or legal representation'.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 At the end of subsection 29B(4)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.132
note: Addition of complaint purposes for Ombudsman and Australian Law Enforcement Integrity Commission.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-17
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding to existing provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

act-sch-7-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 At the end of subsection 29B(4)

18 After section 34
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.132
note: Insert clause after section 34
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 At the end of subsection 35(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: Prohibit threatening a person present at an examination before an examiner.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-19-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-7-sec-19-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 At the end of subsection 35(1)

2 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of eligible
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.130
note: Add Commissioner of Taxation to eligible Commonwealth Board members
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding entities to a set
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

act-sch-7-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of eligible

20 Section 35A
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: Insert '(1)' before 'Where'
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 At the end of section 35A
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(2) At the end of section 35A
has part: 21(3) At the end of section 35A
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21
schema version: 2

21(2) At the end of section 35A
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: No prosecution for an offence in respect of an act or omission if dealt with by the Court under subsection 34B(1)
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 At the end of section 35A

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a temporal interval where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a cognitive AI where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court, then no prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) If an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a diffusion where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a trace where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2) At the end of section 35A

21(3) At the end of section 35A
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: No application can be made under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 21 At the end of section 35A

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No application can be made.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(3) At the end of section 35A

22 Section 61A
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 After paragraph (w) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.138
note: Permits decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-cogai-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-shacl-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-23
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a relation between decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004 as relevant
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission for decisions under specified sections
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Categorizes decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004 as valid
modality: N3Logic
operator: Classifies

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Ensures decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004 conform to specified rules
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates

24 Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.138
note: Add a proceeding in relation to an application under subsection 34B(1) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 in respect of contempt of the Australian Crime Commission.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-24-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-24
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds a proceeding
modality: Deontic
operator: Add

act-sch-7-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of relevant

25 After paragraph 5B(1)(hc)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.138
note: Inserts a proceeding for contempt of the Australian Crime Commission.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-25
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts a new provision
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

26 Application of amendments relating to contempt
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.139
note: Application of amendments relating to contempt
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 Application of amendment made by item 4
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.139
note: Amendment applies to operations before, on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Application of amendments relating to reasons for
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.139
note: Amendments apply to summons or notice issued on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Application of amendments made by items 24 and 25
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.139
note: Amendments apply to information obtained before, on or after commencement.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-29-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-29
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-7-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Application of amendments made by items 24 and 25

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.130
note: Definition of contempt
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: contempt of the ACC has the meaning given by section 34A.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

act-sch-7-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)

34A Contempt of the ACC
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.132
note: Refusing or failing to comply with examiner requirements
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34a-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34a
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits refusing or failing to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-7-sec-34a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34A Contempt of the ACC

34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.133
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 34B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 34B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b
schema version: 2

34B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.133
note: Examiner may apply to courts for contempt dealing
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:

34B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.133
note: Examiner must inform person before making application.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

34B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.133
note: Application must be accompanied by a certificate stating grounds for making the application.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

34C Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 34C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 34C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c
schema version: 2

34C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.134
note: Application for contempt proceeding must be made to the Federal Court or Supreme Court of a State or Territory under section 34B.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34C Conduct of contempt proceedings

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings

34C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.134
note: Proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the laws that apply to punishment of contempt.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34C Conduct of contempt proceedings

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference for proceedings
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of proceedings
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.

34C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.134
note: Certificate under subsection 34B(3) is prima facie evidence of matters specified in the certificate.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34C Conduct of contempt proceedings

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The certificate is prima facie evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to provide evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The certificate is issued by the State.

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings

34D Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d
schema version: 2

34D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
note: Person in contempt may be detained
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Detention obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34D(1) Person in contempt may be detained

34D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
note: Person must be brought before the Court as soon as practicable.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the examiner must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1) in respect of the person;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Person detention is contained within subsection (1).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must, subject to subsection (3) of this section, be brought before the Court as soon as practicable.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Detention implies bringing person before the Court.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must, subject to subsection (3) of this section, be brought before the Court as soon as practicable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must bring person before the Court.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the examiner must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1) in respect of the person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1).
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the examiner must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1) in respect of the person;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Detention spreads to bringing person before the Court.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34D(2) Person in contempt may be detained

34D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
note: Person in contempt may be detained
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appear before the Court
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

34D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
note: Conditions for release from detention
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court imposes conditions on release
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

34D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
note: Court may vary or revoke a condition imposed under subsection (4)
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may vary or revoke a condition
modality: Deontic
operator: may

34E Examiner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34E(1) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
has part: 34E(2) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34e
schema version: 2

34E(1) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
note: Examiner may withdraw contempt application at any time.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34E Examiner may withdraw contempt application

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permissive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34E(1) Examiner may withdraw contempt application

34E(2) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.135
note: Person must be released from detention immediately if examiner withdraws contempt application.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34E Examiner may withdraw contempt application

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the temporal interval between the examiner's action and the person's release is a mandatory obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between examiner's action and person's release
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the provision classifies the person's detention as an obligation using CogAI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of provision as an obligation using CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (2) If the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the diffusion of the obligation to release the person from detention is a mandatory obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to release person from detention
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the recurring trace of the person's release is a mandatory obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of person's release
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34E(2) Examiner may withdraw contempt application

34F Relationship with section 12
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: No evidence required for subsection 12(1) applications
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-34f
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of intelligence operation)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.130
note: Definition of intelligence operation
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of intelligence operation)

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.130
note: Definition of Ombudsman
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman is defined as the Commonwealth Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Ombudsman means the Commonwealth Ombudsman.

act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

act-sch-7-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)

6 Subsection 4A(6) (definition of intelligence operation)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Definition of intelligence operation
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 4A(6) (definition of intelligence operation)

61A Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61A(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 61A(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 61A(3) Review of operation of Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a
schema version: 2

61A(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: Independent review of operation of Act
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review of operation of Act

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to undertake review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61A(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: Review of operation of Act must be undertaken after a 5 year period.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review of operation of Act

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Act
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61A(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.136
note: Minister's review of Act operation is overridden by parliamentary committee review.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Review of operation of Act

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reviews overlap in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt describes an overlap between the Minister's review and parliamentary committee review.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Both reviews occur within the same time period.

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister's review is overridden by committee review.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt implies that a parliamentary committee can infer the Minister's review is overridden.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Committee review is initiated before Minister undertakes review.

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister's review is overridden.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parliamentary committee takes precedence over Minister's review.
modality: Deontic
operator: Override
premise text: Committee review initiated before Minister undertakes review.

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister's review is implied to be overridden.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Excerpt implies that the Minister's review is overridden if a parliamentary committee initiates a review.
modality: N3Logic
operator: Implication
premise text: Committee review is initiated before Minister undertakes review.

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Review is validly initiated by committee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Excerpt validates the parliamentary committee's right to initiate a review.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: Committee review is initiated before Minister undertakes review.

7 At the end of subsection 7B(2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Add the Commissioner of Taxation to the list.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding a new entity to a list is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

act-sch-7-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 At the end of subsection 7B(2)

8 Subsection 7C(5)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Omit '3 days', substitute '7 days'.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Paragraph 28(1A)(b)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.131
note: Omit specific phrase from summons.
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
schema version: 2

act-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Phrase cannot be omitted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omitting phrase is prohibited.

1 Subsection 70.2(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
note: Repeal a penalty.
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-1
schema version: 2

136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 136(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 136(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 136(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-136
schema version: 2

136(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Annual turnover value
source: act.pdf, p.142
note: Annual turnover calculation for corporate bodies
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-136-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for calculating annual turnover
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual turnover value
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Annual turnover calculation for corporate bodies
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

136(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.142
note: Same meaning as in A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-136-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as in A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
modality: Deontic
operator: =

136(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.142
note: Determine related bodies corporate in the same way as for the Corporations Act 2001.
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-136-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

2 Subsection 70.2(1) of the Criminal Code (notes 1 and 2)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
note: Repeal notes and substitute with new note.
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2
schema version: 2

act-sch-8-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interval classification applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identify temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval present

3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3(4) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(5) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(6) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(7) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(8) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-3
schema version: 2

3(4) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
note: Offence punishable by imprisonment, fine or both
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for punishment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies punishment as imprisonment, fine or both
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by imprisonment for not more than 10 years, a fine not more than 10,000 penalty units, or both.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits punishment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses punishment to individuals
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for punishment
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)

3(5) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
note: Body corporate punishable by fine not exceeding certain amounts for offence committed
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of...
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between conduct and fines
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (5) An offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of...
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes implication between conduct and fines
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (5) An offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies fines based on benefit obtained
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained...

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits body corporate from committing certain conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) An offence against subsection (1)

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagates fines to related bodies corporate
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained...

3(6) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
note: Excludes certain supplies from annual turnover calculation
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes certain supplies from annual turnover calculation
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

3(7) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
note: Meaning of expressions from A New Tax System Act 1999 applied to subsection (6)
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as in A New Tax System Act 1999
modality: Deontic
operator: same meaning

3(8) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.140
note: Determine relatedness for purposes of this section and Corporations Act 2001
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines relatedness
modality: Deontic
operator: determines

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(8) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code

4 Subsection 141.1(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.141
note: Repeal the penalty.
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 141.1(3) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.141
note: Repeal a penalty.
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-5
schema version: 2

act-sch-8-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

6 At the end of section 141.1
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(5) At the end of section 141.1
has part: 6(6) At the end of section 141.1
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-6
schema version: 2

6(5) At the end of section 141.1
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.141
note: Offence punishable by imprisonment, fine or both
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-6-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 6 At the end of section 141.1

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits punishment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

6(6) At the end of section 141.1
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.141
note: Offence against subsections (1) or (3) by a body corporate is punishable
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-6-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 6 At the end of section 141.1

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal interval defined in Schedule 8
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits offence against subsections (1) or (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation to punish offence against subsections (1) or (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits punishment for failure to punish offence against subsections (1) or (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace with temporal interval defined in Schedule 8
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurringTrace
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate

1 Section 300.2 of the Criminal Code (definition of import)
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.143
note: Repeal definition of import, substitute with new definition
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-1
schema version: 2

act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition substitution
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute

act-sch-9-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 300.2 of the Criminal Code (definition of import)

138 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-138-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-138
schema version: 2

Act No. 4 of 2010 as amended
type: Document
identifier: No. 4 of 2010
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU