Act No. 4 of 2010 as amended
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 4 of 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2
note: Commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-11-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Temporal commencement
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-19
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-2
note: Commencement of Schedule 1 items 1 to 213 depends on two events.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-2-norm

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20
note: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-norm

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-3
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-3-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-3
note: Conditional commencement of provision(s)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-11-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-2-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1 item 215
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-norm

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-2-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-5
note: Conditional commencement of provision(s)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-11-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-3
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-3-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-11-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: The event mentioned in paragraph (b) must occur
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-3-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-11-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: A specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-4-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-8
note: Schedule 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-8-norm

19 March 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-4-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-9-norm

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-5-norm

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-10
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 6 items 1 and 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-10-norm

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-6
note: Applicable duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-20-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 February
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Duty applies
premise text: (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-11
note: Commences immediately after subsection 369(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 of Victoria.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-norm

1 January 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-1-3
note: References Vict. Gazette No. G50 p3215
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-3-norm

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-12
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-12-norm

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-7
note: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.9
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-7-norm

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-2
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-2-norm

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-13
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-11-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-8
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-8-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-3-2
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in a Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-2-norm

4 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-3
has part: 4(1) Regulations
has part: 4(2) Regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10

4(1) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1
part of: 4 Regulations
note: Regulations may be prescribed by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may prescribe
logic summary: Governor-General has obligation to prescribe regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulations are in effect during the carrying out of the Act.
premise text: (1) The Governor-General may make regulations...
conclusion text: ...giving effect to this Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Regulations prescribe matters required or permitted by the Act.
premise text: (1) The Governor-General may make regulations...
conclusion text: ...prescribing matters: (a) required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Regulations diffuse the requirements of the Act.
premise text: (1) The Governor-General may make regulations...
conclusion text: ...necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-2
part of: 4 Regulations
note: Regulations may be made prescribing matters of a transitional nature.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-3-ss-2-norm

1 Subsection 29(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Omit 'may', substitute 'must'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
conclusion text: Omit 'may', substitute 'must'.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 29(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Replace 'specified' with 'a specified interest in'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-2-norm

3 Paragraph 29(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Substitute 'interest' for 'property'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-3-norm

4 Subsection 29(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Replace 'specified' with 'a specified interest in'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-4-norm

5 Paragraphs 29(2)(a), (b), (c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Substitute 'interest' for 'property'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace 'property' with 'interest'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 29(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Insertion of 'a specified interest in' before 'property'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-6-norm

7 Paragraphs 29(3)(a) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Replace 'property' with 'interest'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace 'property' with 'interest'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 29(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Insertion of phrase in subsection 29(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-8-norm

9 Paragraph 29(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Omit “owns the property”, substitute ‘has the interest’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-9-norm

10 Paragraph 29(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Substitute interest is not held for property is not owned.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to substitute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm

11 Section 29A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Omit 'may', substitute 'must'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
premise text: Omit ‘may’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘must’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 29A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Substitute 'a specified interest in' for 'specified'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-12-norm

13 Paragraph 29A(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: The court must be satisfied that the interest is held by a person other than the suspect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Paragraph 29A(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The court must be satisfied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 29A (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Substitute 'examinations in relation to the restraining order' for 'an examination of the applicant'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-norm

15 Subsection 30(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Allow person to apply for restraining order before it is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to apply for restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 31(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
has part: 16(1) Subsection 31(1)
has part: 16(1A) Subsection 31(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12

16(1) Subsection 31(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Subsection 31(1)
note: Permits a person to apply for an order under section 29 or 29A if a restraining order covers property in which the person claims an interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) Subsection 31(1)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission to apply for an order under section 29 or 29A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(1A) Subsection 31(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a
part of: 16 Subsection 31(1)
note: Application must be made to the court that made the restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1A) Subsection 31(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made to the court that made the restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 At the end of subsection 31(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: No need to conduct examinations until a reasonable opportunity has been had.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to conduct examinations
premise text: DPP need not do so until...
conclusion text: No need to conduct examinations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Paragraph 32(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Substitute examinations in relation to the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Paragraph 32(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute examinations in relation to the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Division 3 of Part 2-1 applies to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-19-norm

20 Subsection 73(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Insertion of phrase in subsection 73(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-norm

21 Paragraph 73(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-21-norm

22 Paragraphs 73(1)(c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Court must satisfy conditions before forfeiting property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Paragraphs 73(1)(c), (d) and (e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must satisfy conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm

23 Paragraph 73(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Substitute ‘interest’ for ‘property’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-23-norm

24 Paragraphs 73(2)(b), (c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Omit 'property' and substitute 'interest'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-24-norm

25 Subsection 74(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Substitute property in which the person claims an interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 74(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
has part: 26(2) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
has part: 26(3) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
has part: 26(4) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14

26(2) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)
note: Right to apply for exclusion order after forfeiture order is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has the right to apply for exclusion order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(3) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-3
part of: 26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)
note: Cannot apply for exclusion order if notified but did not appear at hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(3) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of exclusion order application
premise text: (3) However, unless the court gives leave...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval between notification and appearance
premise text: (a) was notified of the application for the *forfeiture order, but did not appear at the hearing of that application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of individuals who appeared at hearing
premise text: (b) appeared at the hearing of that application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(4) Subsections 74(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-4
part of: 26 Subsections 74(2) and (3)
note: Court may grant leave to apply under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 75(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Omit specific phrase from legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of examination under Part 3-1.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Section 76
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Omit specific examination phrase and substitute with new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-28-norm

29 Subdivision C of Division 5 of Part 2-2 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 77(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: A court must make a compensation order if an applicant has an interest in property specified in the forfeiture order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Subsection 77(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: A court must make a compensation order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Paragraph 77(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Insertion of phrase after 'Commonwealth'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Paragraph 77(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts a phrase into text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Section 78
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Repeal section and substitute with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-32-norm

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm

78 Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
has part: 78(1) Application for compensation orders
has part: 78(2) Application for compensation orders
has part: 78(3) Application for compensation orders
has part: 78(4) Application for compensation orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16

78(1) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders
note: Application for compensation order if forfeiture order is pending
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Application for compensation orders
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for compensation order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders
note: Right to apply for compensation order after forfeiture
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has the right to apply for compensation order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(3) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-3
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders
note: Cannot apply under subsection (2) if notified of application for forfeiture order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot apply under subsection (2)
premise text: Notification of application for forfeiture order
conclusion text: Prohibition on applying under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(4) Application for compensation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-4
part of: 78 Application for compensation orders
note: Court may grant leave to apply for compensation order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(4) Application for compensation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 At the end of subsection 79(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: DPP need not conduct examinations until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to conduct examinations
premise text: The DPP must conduct examinations.
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: DPP's discretion to delay examinations
premise text: The DPP may delay conducting examinations if necessary.
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Examinations may overlap with other application processes
premise text: The examinations may occur concurrently with other aspects of the application process.
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Examinations are contingent on a reasonable opportunity
premise text: The examinations must occur after a reasonable opportunity has passed.
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-33-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Examinations diffuse into other application processes
premise text: The examinations may have implications for other aspects of the application process.
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 At the end of Subdivision C of Division 5 of Part 2-2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Addition of new legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-34-norm

79A When an application can be heard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79a
note: Application for compensation order cannot be heard until DPP has conducted examinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-79a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of hearing application until DPP has conducted examinations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Application of amended provisions to forfeiture orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-35-norm

36 Section 91 (simplified outline)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Compensation is payable by the Commonwealth in certain cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The Commonwealth has an obligation to pay compensation in these cases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between payment and compensation
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The payment of compensation overlaps with the temporal interval during which it is payable.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Payment implies obligation to pay compensation
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: If payment is made, then the Commonwealth has an obligation to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffersFrom
logic summary: Payment and compensation differ in meaning
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The payment of compensation differs from the concept of compensation itself.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Commonwealth recognizes obligation to pay compensation
premise text: There are cases in which compensation is payable by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The Commonwealth recognizes its obligation to pay compensation in these cases.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Paragraph 92(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Omit “the”, substitute “a”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-37-norm

38 Subparagraph 92(1)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Insert 'under section 17 or 18' after 'order'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Subparagraph 92(1)(b)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm

39 Paragraph 92(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Substitute ‘conviction day’ for ‘day of the conviction’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39-norm

40 After section 92
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Insert clause after section 92
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-norm

92A Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92a
has part: 92A(1) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
has part: 92A(2) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18

92A(1) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1
part of: 92A Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
note: Provide written notice to person with interest in property before forfeiture.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92A(2) Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2
part of: 92A Notice of date of forfeiture under this Part, etc.
note: No notice required if application for extension order or other applications made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: DPP need not give notice
conclusion text: No notice required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Paragraph 93(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Omit “day of”, substitute ‘*conviction day for’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-41-norm

42 Paragraph 93(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Applicant must apply to court under certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Paragraph 93(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Paragraph 93(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Substitute specific section numbers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-43-norm

44 Subsection 93(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Substitute 'conviction day for' in the phrase 'day of'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to modify text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Subsection 93(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Substitute specific section numbers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-45-norm

46 Subsection 93(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Substitute “*conviction day for” in “day of”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-46-norm

47 Subsection 93(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Substitute specific section numbers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-47-norm

48 At the end of section 93
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Provide written notice to persons with an interest in forfeited property
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-48-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Subsection 94(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Substitute 'a restraining' for 'the restraining'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-49-norm

50 Subsection 94(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Omit ‘may’, substitute ‘must’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
premise text: Omit ‘may’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘must’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Paragraphs 94(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-51-norm

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
note: Court must be satisfied that applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy condition
premise text: Applicant has applied for an order under this section.
conclusion text: Court must be satisfied that applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for satisfying condition
premise text: The court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
conclusion text: There is a temporal interval during which the court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal trace for satisfying condition
premise text: The court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
conclusion text: There is a temporal trace during which the court must be satisfied that the applicant has an interest in property covered by restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Interest in property is a concept that can be represented using CogAI
premise text: Applicant has an *interest in property covered by the restraining order.
conclusion text: The applicant's interest in property is a specific instance of a concept that can be represented using CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Interest in property is a concept that can be validated using SHACL
premise text: Applicant has an *interest in property covered by the restraining order.
conclusion text: The applicant's interest in property is a specific instance of a concept that can be validated using SHACL.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Paragraph 94(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Replace 'the person' with 'a person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-52-norm

53 Paragraph 94(1)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Insertion of phrase in property definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-53-norm

54 Paragraph 94(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Substitute 'applicant's' for 'defendant's'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-54-norm

act-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Paragraph 94(1)(f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55 At the end of subsection 94(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: DPP need not conduct examinations until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-55-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to conduct examinations
premise text: The DPP must conduct examinations.
conclusion text: However, the DPP need not do so until it has had a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 At the end of section 94
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Application must not be heard until DPP has had a reasonable opportunity to conduct examinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-56-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Examinations must occur during application hearing
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 After section 94
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-57-norm

94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a
has part: 94A(1) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(2) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(3) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(4) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
has part: 94A(5) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20

94A(1) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
note: Court must make an order if applicant has interest in property covered by restraining order and meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(1) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make order if conditions met.
premise text: The court that made a *restraining order referred to in paragraph 92(1)(b) must...
conclusion text: ...must make an order that complies with subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Proportion of value not derived or realised from commission of offence.
premise text: the court is satisfied that a proportion of the value of the applicant’s interest was not derived or realised, directly or indirectly, from the commission of any offence;
conclusion text: ...and (d) the court is satisfied that a proportion of the value of the applicant’s interest was not derived or realised...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: AND
logic summary: Multiple conditions must be met.
premise text: the applicant has an *interest in property covered, or that was at any time covered, by the restraining order;
conclusion text: ...and (b) the court is satisfied that the applicant has an *interest in property covered, or that was at any time covered, by the restraining order;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure conditions met.
premise text: ...must make an order that complies with subsection (2).
conclusion text: ...if: (a) a person (the applicant) has applied for an order under this section;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94A(2) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
note: Court must specify proportion and direct Commonwealth to dispose of property and pay applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(2) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must specify proportion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94A(3) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
note: Claimant may apply for order under section at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(3) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Claimant has the right to apply for order under section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94A(4) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
note: Court leave required to apply for compensation after forfeiture.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(4) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court must give leave to apply for compensation after forfeiture.
premise text: subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
conclusion text: subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relationship between notice and application.
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of notice and application.
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about notice and application.
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of individuals based on their relationship with the property.
premise text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: was given a notice under subsection 92A(1) in relation to the property; or was not given such a notice because of subsection 92A(2);
conclusion text: the person cannot, unless the court gives leave, apply under subsection (3) if he or she: did not make the application under subsection (3) before that forfeiture.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

94A(5) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5
part of: 94A Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
note: Court may give leave to apply if satisfied with good reason for not applying before forfeiture.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(5) Compensating for proportion of property not derived or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-94a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Granting leave is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
has part: 16(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 16(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 16(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 16(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22

16(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Must provide written notice to DPP of application and grounds.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide written notice to DPP of application and grounds.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: DPP may appear and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to appear and adduce evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: DPP must give notice of grounds to contest application
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Application must wait for DPP examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-16-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Application must wait
premise text: DPP examination required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Subsection 102(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Omit “(1)”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-58-norm

59 Subsection 102(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Omit “may”, substitute “must”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
premise text: Omit ‘may’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘must’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Paragraph 102(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: The court must be satisfied that the applicant had an interest in the property before forfeiture, and the interest was lawfully acquired.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Paragraph 102(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The court must be satisfied
premise text: The applicant had an interest in the property before forfeiture
conclusion text: and the interest was lawfully acquired
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The applicant's interest in the property was acquired before the forfeiture
premise text: the applicant had an interest in the property before the forfeiture of the property
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Subparagraph 102(1)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Omit specific phrase from legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Commonwealth from using certain language
premise text: Substitute phrase with new one
conclusion text: Omit original phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Subsections 102(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.23
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-62-norm

63 Section 104
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.23
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-63-norm

104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104
has part: 104(1) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
has part: 104(2) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
has part: 104(3) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
has part: 104(4) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.23

104(1) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-1
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
note: Application for order under section 102 or 103 after forfeiture
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.23
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(1) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Claiming an interest in forfeited property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(2) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-2
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
note: Cannot make an application for an order under section 102 without court leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.23
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(2) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Cannot make an application
premise text: Court leave required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(3) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-3
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
note: Court may give leave to apply under section 102 or 103
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.23
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may give leave to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(4) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-ss-4
part of: 104 Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
note: Must provide written notice to DPP of application and grounds.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.23
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(4) Applying for orders under section 102 or 103
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATORY NOTICE
logic summary: Written notice is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
has part: 18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24

18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: The DPP may appear and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: DPP must give applicant notice of grounds to contest application
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
conclusion text: The DPP must give the applicant notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Application must wait for DPP examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Application must wait
premise text: DPP examination required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Paragraph 106(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Modify subsection 102(d)(i)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-64-norm

65 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-65-norm

66 Paragraph 333(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: Omit specific phrase from conviction sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting the specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Applicability of paragraph 333(1)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-1-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Obligation to apply the provision
premise text: The court passes sentence on or after the commencement of this item
conclusion text: Paragraph 333(1)(a) applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between applicability and conduct
premise text: The conduct constituting the offence concerned occurred or occurs before, on or after that commencement
conclusion text: The conduct occurring before, on or after the commencement is within the applicability of paragraph 333(1)(a)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of applicability
premise text: The court passes sentence on or after the commencement of this item
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace from the commencement to the conduct occurring before, on or after that commencement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply the provision
premise text: The court passes sentence on or after the commencement of this item
conclusion text: There is an obligation to apply paragraph 333(1)(a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

68 Subparagraph 121(4)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Insertion of 'or property suspected of being subject to the effective control of the person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-68-norm

act-sch-1-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Subparagraph 121(4)(a)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

69 Paragraph 122(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Omit all words after 'control' and substitute with 'of the person or another person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-69-norm

70 Paragraph 122(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Omit words after 'provided' and substitute with 'to the person or another person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-70-norm

71 Paragraph 124(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Insert 'and the other unlawful activity'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Paragraph 124(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of new clause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Paragraph 124(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Insertion of 'or property that is suspected of being subject to the effective control of the person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-72-norm

act-sch-1-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Paragraph 124(5)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

73 Section 130
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Omit 'offence' and substitute 'unlawful activity'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-73-norm

74 Paragraph 130(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
note: Omit 'offence', substitute 'unlawful activity'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-74-norm

75 Subsection 133(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
note: Modify subsections (2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-75-norm

76 After subsection 133(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
note: Inserts Schedule 1: Proceeds of crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.25
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-76-norm

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
has part: 20(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 20(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.26

20(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Increase penalty amount under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.26
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May increase penalty amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may consider additional factors when determining increase amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.26
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayConsider
logic summary: Court discretion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

77 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
note: Division 2 of Part 2-4 applies to pecuniary penalty orders applied on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.26
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to pecuniary penalty orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 At the end of section 134
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2
note: Court may allow late application for pecuniary penalty order in interests of justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.26
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-78-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-78-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits late application.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Subsection 136(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
note: Omit specified text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.27
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-79-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Subsections 136(3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
note: Must provide affidavit copy to subject within reasonable time
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.27
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-80-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide affidavit copy to subject within reasonable time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
note: Division 3 of Part 2-4 applies to applications made on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.27
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-81-norm

82 Subsection 146(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
note: Discharge of pecuniary penalty order upon quashing conviction and non-application to confirm or vary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.27
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-82-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-82-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82 Subsection 146(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Discharge
logic summary: Obligation discharge
premise text: Quashing conviction
conclusion text: Order discharged
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Subsection 146(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.27
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-83-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 After subsection 146(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
note: Inserts Schedule 1: Proceeds of crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.27
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-84-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval not specified
premise text: No temporal relation defined
conclusion text: Interval unspecified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
note: Application to confirm or vary order may be made by DPP.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Duty to make application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Subsection 146(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
note: Discharge pecuniary penalty order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-85-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-1-sec-85-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85 Subsection 146(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
logic summary: Obligation discharge
premise text: (a) the person’s conviction of the offence is subsequently *quashed;
conclusion text: the order does not relate to any other offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
logic summary: Obligation discharge
premise text: (b) the order does not relate to any other offence;
conclusion text: the offence is not a *serious offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Section 147 (including the note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
note: Insert 'or variation' after 'confirmation' in section 147 heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-86-norm

87 Subsection 148(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
note: Insertion of 'or variation' after 'confirmation'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-87-norm

88 Subparagraph 148(2)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
note: Omit 'the offence', substitute 'any of the offences to which the order relates'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-88-norm

89 Subparagraph 148(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
note: Omit “that offence”, substitute ‘any of those offences’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-89-norm

90 Paragraph 148(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
note: Substitute 'such a conviction' for 'the conviction'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-90-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 After section 149
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
note: Inserts ComLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-91-norm

149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a
has part: 149A(1) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
has part: 149A(2) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
has part: 149A(3) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.29

149A(1) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1
part of: 149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
note: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.29
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149A(1) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149A(2) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2
part of: 149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
note: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.29
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149A(2) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to vary pecuniary penalty order amount
premise text: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal overlap between quashed conviction and pecuniary penalty order
premise text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Excerpt describes a recurring variation of pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
premise text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Excerpt diffuses the obligation to vary pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
premise text: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Excerpt recognizes a pattern in the variation of pecuniary penalty order amount based on quashed conviction
premise text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
conclusion text: Amount is an amount equal to so much of the penalty amount as the court reasonably believes...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149A(3) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3
part of: 149A Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
note: Court may consider transcripts and evidence when determining penalty amount reduction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.29
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149A(3) Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Court must consider relevant matter
premise text: Court may vary pecuniary penalty order
conclusion text: Court considers transcripts and evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Subsection 150(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
note: Insertion of text after section 149A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.29
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Text insertion obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Subsection 150(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
note: Insert 'or vary' after 'confirm'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.29
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-93-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-93-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
premise text: Text to be inserted
conclusion text: Text 'or vary' inserted after 'confirm'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
note: Division 5 of Part 2-4 applies to convictions quashed on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.29
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-94-norm

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.30
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids the specified conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Paragraph 335(6)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with specific orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.30
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-95-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of certain orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Paragraph 335(6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
note: Insertion of '(the convicting magistrate)' after 'magistrate'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.30
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-96-norm

97 Subsection 335(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-97
note: Substitute magistrate with same court as convicting magistrate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.30
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-97-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-97-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-97-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 97 Subsection 335(6)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Substitution obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-98
note: Application of subsection 335(6) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to persons convicted before or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.30
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-98-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-98-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-98-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-98-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Application of a rule to persons
premise text: Subsection 335(6) applies in relation to persons convicted before or after commencement.
conclusion text: The subsection applies to the persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

99 Paragraph 180(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-99
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with a person who is a suspect in relation to the restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.31
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-99-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-99-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits a person from being a suspect in relation to the restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Subsection 180(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-100
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.31
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-100-norm

101 Subsection 180(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-101
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.31
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-101-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
premise text: Omit ‘(including the nature and location of any property)’.
conclusion text: Do not omit specified phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-102
note: Conditional commencement of section 180
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.31
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-102-norm

103 After section 180
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-103
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.31
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-103-norm

180A Examination orders relating to applications for exclusion from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180a
note: Court may order examination of person with interest in property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.31
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-180a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180A Examination orders relating to applications for exclusion from
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-180a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
note: Ceases effect when application is withdrawn or court makes a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases effect
premise text: (No. 2) 2010
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During withdrawal or decision-making
premise text: (No. 2) 2010
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180b
has part: 180B(1) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
has part: 180B(2) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32

180B(1) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1
part of: 180B Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
note: Court may order examination of person with interest in forfeited property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180B(1) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B(2) Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2
part of: 180B Examination orders relating to applications for compensation
note: Ceases effect when application is withdrawn or court makes a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases effect
premise text: (2) The *examination order ceases to have effect...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180C Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180c
has part: 180C(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
has part: 180C(2) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32

180C(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1
part of: 180C Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
note: Court may order examination of person with interest in forfeited property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180C(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for examination order
premise text: (1) If an application for an order under section 102...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180C(2) Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2
part of: 180C Examination orders relating to applications under section 102
note: Ceases effect when application is withdrawn or court makes a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases effect
premise text: (2) The *examination order ceases to have effect when...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180D Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180d
has part: 180D(1) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
has part: 180D(2) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.33

180D(1) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1
part of: 180D Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
note: Court may order examination of person against whom confiscation order was made or their spouse/de facto partner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.33
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180D(1) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court obligation to order examination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180D(2) Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2
part of: 180D Examination orders relating to enforcement of confiscation
note: Ceases effect when confiscation order proceedings are finally determined, withdrawn or otherwise disposed of.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.33
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180E Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180e
has part: 180E(1) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
has part: 180E(2) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.33

180E(1) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1
part of: 180E Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
note: Court must order examination of person whose property was subject to restraining order or spouse/de facto partner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.33
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180E(1) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must order examination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180E(2) Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180e-ss-2
part of: 180E Examination orders relating to restraining orders revoked
note: Ceases effect when restraining order would have ceased to have effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.33
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180e-ss-2-norm

104 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2
note: Application of sections 180A and 180B to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.33
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to apply sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Defines a diffusion pattern for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-104-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Defines a cognitive AI pattern for the application of sections 180A and 180B in relation to applications for orders under section 73 or 77 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
premise text: (1)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
note: Conditional commencement of sections for restraining orders and forfeiture orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.34
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-28-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional Commencement
logic summary: Conditional commencement of sections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Subsection 181(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.34
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-105-norm

106 Subsection 181(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-106
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.34
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-106-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-107
note: Commences on a specified date, applying to convictions quashed after that date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.34
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-107-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines commencement date
premise text: Commencement specified on or after a certain date
conclusion text: Date of commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Section 182
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-108
note: Insert '(1)' before 'An'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.35
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-108-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of '(1)'
premise text: Text modification
conclusion text: Obligation to insert '(1)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

109 At the end of section 182
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-109
note: Court must consider examination order without notice if DPP requests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.35
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-109-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Subsection 187(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-110
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’ (first occurring)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.35
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-110-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 After paragraph 187(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-111
note: Exemptions from examination based on changes in person's status
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.35
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-111-norm

112 Paragraph 187(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-112
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.35
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-112-norm

30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
note: Relevant affairs subject to examination under specified sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: relevant_to
logic summary: Affairs relevant to the affairs of a person
premise text: (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person
conclusion text: *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During specified sections, affairs subject to examination
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During specified sections, affairs subject to examination (recurring trace)
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: relevant_to
logic summary: Affairs relevant to affairs of a person (diffusion)
premise text: (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-30-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: relevant_to
logic summary: Affairs relevant to affairs of a person (argumentation)
premise text: (b) is relevant to the *affairs of a person whose affairs can, under section 180, 180A, 180B, 180C, 180D, 180E or 181, be subject to the examination.
conclusion text: *affairs of a person
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-113
note: Application of sections 182 and 187 to examination orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-113-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-113-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-113-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Commencement is a temporal interval
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Section 195 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-114
note: Omit penalty unit amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-114-norm

115 Subsection 196(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-115
note: Omit penalty unit amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-115-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting penalty unit amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 After section 197
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-116
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-116-norm

197A Giving false or misleading answers or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-197a
note: Giving false or misleading answers or documents in an examination is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-197a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197A Giving false or misleading answers or documents
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-197a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Giving false or misleading answers or documents in an examination.
conclusion text: It is prohibited to give false or misleading answers or documents in an examination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117 Subparagraph 269(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117
note: Substitute ‘*affairs’ for ‘affairs’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-117-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-117-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118
note: Defines 'affairs of a person' for the purposes of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.37
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-118-norm

act-sch-1-sec-118-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118 Section 338
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

119 Section 338 (definition of examination order)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-119
note: Insertion of section numbers in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.37
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-119-norm

32 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm

120 After paragraph 202(5)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120
note: Requires document relevant to identifying, locating or quantifying property suspected of being proceeds of an indictable offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-120-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-120-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-120-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120 After paragraph 202(5)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121 Paragraph 202(5)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-121
note: Omit 'such property' and substitute 'property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'such property'
premise text: Omit ‘such property’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
premise text: Omit ‘such property’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
premise text: Omit ‘such property’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
premise text: Omit ‘such property’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-121-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'such property' with a specific temporal interval
premise text: Omit ‘such property’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘property referred to in paragraph (c) or (ca)’
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

122 Paragraph 202(5)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122
note: Insertion of clause (ca) after clause (c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-122-norm

123 Subsection 202(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-123
note: Insertion of paragraph (5)(ca) after subsection 202(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-123-norm

124 Subsection 202(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124
note: Replace 'subparagraph' with 'provision'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-124-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-124-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 After paragraph 203(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125
note: Specify form and manner of document production
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-125-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-125-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-125-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125 After paragraph 203(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-125-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify form and manner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Subsection 203(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126
has part: 126(2) Subsection 203(2)
has part: 126(3) Subsection 203(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38

126(2) Subsection 203(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-ss-2
part of: 126 Subsection 203(2)
note: Specify a time for production order at least 3 days after its issuance, or 14 days after its issuance if appropriate.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(2) Subsection 203(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify a time for production order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Specify a time for production order at least 3 days after its issuance, or 14 days after its issuance if appropriate
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(3) Subsection 203(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-ss-3
part of: 126 Subsection 203(2)
note: Magistrate must consider urgency and hardship when deciding on an earlier time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(3) Subsection 203(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-126-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must consider urgency and hardship.
premise text: (3) The matters to which the magistrate must have regard...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127 At the end of section 211
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-127
note: Defence for non-compliance with production order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.39
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-127-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-127-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-127-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 127 At the end of section 211
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with production order
premise text: Failure to produce documents within specified time
conclusion text: Defence against offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

128 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.39
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-128-norm

129 Paragraphs 213(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-129
note: Insert 'or was' after 'is'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.39
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-129-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-129-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-129-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Insert 'or was' after 'is'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm

130 Paragraph 213(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130
note: Omit “such”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-130-norm

131 Paragraph 213(1)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-131
note: Insertion of 'or held' after 'hold'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-131-norm

act-sch-1-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131 Paragraph 213(1)(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

132 After paragraph 213(1)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132
note: Determine stored value card issuance and transaction details.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-132-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132 After paragraph 213(1)(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 At the end of subsection 213(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-133
note: List of individuals and entities that may be added to the list in subsection 213(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-133-norm

act-sch-1-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133 At the end of subsection 213(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

134 Section 214
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-134-norm

act-sch-1-sec-134-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134 Section 214
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

135 Paragraph 214(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-135
note: Insertion of record-keeping capabilities into paragraph 214(d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-135-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-135-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-135-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135 Paragraph 214(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Insertion of record-keeping capabilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Paragraph 214(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136
note: Specify that information or documents must be provided within a certain timeframe.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-136-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-136-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136 Paragraph 214(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify that information or documents must be provided within a certain timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 At the end of section 214
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-137
note: Matters to which officer must have regard when deciding whether to specify an earlier day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-137-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-137-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-137-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137 At the end of section 214
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies the provision as an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Section 218
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138
note: Insertion of number in section heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-138-norm

139 At the end of section 218
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-139
note: Defence to an offence against subsection (1) if person fails to comply with notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-139-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-139-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-139-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139 At the end of section 218
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-139-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence to an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-140-norm

141 Subsection 219(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-141
note: A judge may make an order regarding criminal matters on indictment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-141-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-141-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141 Subsection 219(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
note: Financial institutions must not provide information about transactions without a monitoring order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of providing information about transactions without a monitoring order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Paragraph 219(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-142-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 Paragraph 219(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-143
note: Insert 'or card' after 'account'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-143-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-143-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-143-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143 Paragraph 219(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Insertion of text
premise text: Text to be inserted
conclusion text: Account or card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Subsection 219(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144
note: Replace 'in question' with 'or to whom the card was issued'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-144-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-144-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-144-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: replacement
logic summary: Replacement of words
premise text: Replace 'in question'
conclusion text: Omit 'in question', substitute 'or to whom the card was issued'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

145 Paragraph 220(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-145
note: Specify name or names of account or person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-145-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-145-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 145 Paragraph 220(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specify
logic summary: Specify obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146
note: Application of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-146-norm

act-sch-1-sec-146-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 146 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

147 Section 338 (definition of account)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-147
note: Defines account as a facility or arrangement for accepting deposits or allowing withdrawals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-147-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-1-sec-147-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 147 Section 338 (definition of account)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies account into specific types
premise text: account means any facility or arrangement through which a financial institution accepts deposits or allows withdrawals
conclusion text: account is defined as a fixed term deposit, safety deposit box, credit card account, loan account, cash management trust, or closed account
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes the definition of account
premise text: Repeal the definition, substitute:
conclusion text: The definition of account is substituted with a new definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148
note: Definition of stored value card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.43
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-148-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Definition of key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm

149 After paragraph 39(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149
note: Suspect must provide sworn statement to specified person within a specified period.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-149-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-149-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149 After paragraph 39(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide sworn statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Paragraph 39(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-150
note: Insertion of 'or a previous owner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-150-norm

act-sch-1-sec-150-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150 Paragraph 39(1)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

151 Paragraph 39(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151
note: Insertion of 'or previous owner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-151-norm

act-sch-1-sec-151-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151 Paragraph 39(1)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

152 After paragraph 39(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152
note: Order directing a person to provide information about property.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-152-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-152-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-152-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152 After paragraph 39(1)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Legal obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153 Paragraph 39(1)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-153
note: Insertion of additional term in restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-153-norm

act-sch-1-sec-153-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 153 Paragraph 39(1)(g)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

154 After subsection 39(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-154
note: Court must consider application for ancillary order without notice if DPP requests and restraining order was considered without notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-154-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-154-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-154-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider application
premise text: DPP requests
conclusion text: Court must consider application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155 After subsection 39(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-155
has part: 155(4A) After subsection 39(4)
has part: 155(4B) After subsection 39(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45

155(4A) After subsection 39(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a
part of: 155 After subsection 39(4)
note: Court may direct DPP to give or publish notice of application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 155(4A) After subsection 39(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY
logic summary: Specify time and manner of notice
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155(4B) After subsection 39(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b
part of: 155 After subsection 39(4)
note: Written notice to affected persons after ancillary order
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap of request and ancillary order
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap of request and ancillary order
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationSpread
logic summary: Information spread from request to ancillary order
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-155-ss-4b-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of request on ancillary order
premise text: (4B) If the court makes the ancillary order after a request under subsection (3A), the *DPP must give written notice to any person whom the DPP reasonably believes may be affected by the order.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156 After section 39
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-156
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-156-norm

39A Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39a
has part: 39A(1) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
has part: 39A(2) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45

39A(1) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1
part of: 39A Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
note: No exemption from sworn statements under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39A(1) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39A(2) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2
part of: 39A Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
note: Exemptions from privilege against self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39A(2) Privilege against self incrimination etc. does not apply
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-39a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide sworn statement in certain circumstances
premise text: (2) However, in the case of a natural person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39B Application to revoke ancillary order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39b
note: Application to revoke ancillary order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-39b-norm

act-sch-1-sec-39b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39B Application to revoke ancillary order
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
has part: 40(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 40(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46

40(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Application must be made within 14 days after notification of ancillary order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified timeframe.
premise text: The application must be made...
conclusion text: ...within 14 days after the person was notified of the ancillary order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Application timeframe is a temporal interval.
premise text: The application must be made within...
conclusion text: ...14 days after the person was notified of the ancillary order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Notice must be given to entitled persons
description: written notice and grounds for revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Stay of ancillary order effect until court determines application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may revoke ancillary order on application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-6
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may consider appropriate matter in determining application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-6-norm

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7
part of: 40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may vary ancillary order to extend period if appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-40-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May vary order
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: ...vary the order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157 Section 40 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-157
note: Insertion of additional entity in a restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-157-norm

act-sch-1-sec-157-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157 Section 40 (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

158 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-158
note: Division 5 of Part 2-1 applies to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-158-norm

158A Subparagraph 266A(1)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-158a
note: Substitute provision in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-158a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-158a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-158a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158A Subparagraph 266A(1)(a)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-158a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159 Subsection 64(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-159
note: Omit specific court phrase
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-159-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-159-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-159-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific court phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Paragraph 64(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-160
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with transcript of proceeding against person for unlawful activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-160-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-160-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on the specified activity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-161
note: Section applies in relation to forfeiture orders applied for on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-161-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-1-sec-161-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section applies to forfeiture orders
premise text: Section 64 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
conclusion text: Whether conduct occurred before, on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-161-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Section applies to forfeiture orders applied for on or after commencement
premise text: Commencement of this item
conclusion text: After commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

162 Subsection 138(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162
note: Omit specific court phrase from indictment application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-162-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-162-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-162-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific court phrase from indictment application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163 Paragraph 138(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-163
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with transcript of proceeding against person for unlawful activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-163-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on the specified activity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-164
note: Commences on or after commencement of this item
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-164-norm

42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm

165 After section 318
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-165
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-165-norm

318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a
has part: 318A(1) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(2) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(3) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(4) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(5) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
has part: 318A(6) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48

318A(1) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
note: Direct evidence by a person of a matter would be admissible in a proceeding before a court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318A(1) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admissibility
logic summary: Direct evidence by a person of a matter would be admissible in a proceeding before a court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318A(2) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
note: Statement admissible in proceedings if absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318A(2) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Statement admissible if certain conditions are met.
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal intervals for statement admissibility.
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal intervals for statement admissibility.
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Statement admissibility diffused to other parties.
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Statement admissibility implies other parties' actions.
premise text: Absent witness is dead, unfit, or cannot be found.
conclusion text: Statement admissible in proceedings if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318A(3) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
note: Rules apply to evidence of statements admitted under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318A(3) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicable obligation
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicable linear logic
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicable Allen interval
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicable diffusion
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicable CogAI
premise text: (3) The rules in subsections (4) to (6) apply
conclusion text: if evidence of a statement is admitted under subsection (2)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318A(4) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
note: Consider factors when evaluating the statement as evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318A(4) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Evaluate the statement's weight in proceedings.
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...
conclusion text: Regard is to be had to: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Consider time intervals.
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: consider
logic summary: Evaluate the statement's relevance.
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the absent witness's circumstances.
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: consider
logic summary: Evaluate the statement's accuracy.
premise text: (4) In deciding how much weight (if any) to give to the statement as evidence of a matter...
conclusion text: ... regard is to be had to: ...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

318A(5) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
note: Evidence admissible if absent witness not called as a witness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318A(5) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Absent witness not called as a witness
conclusion text: Evidence admissible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318A(6) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6
part of: 318A Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
note: Evidence of a matter is not admissible if the absent witness denied it in cross-examination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 318A(6) Admissibility in proceedings of statements made at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implied prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition by implication
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: interval relation
logic summary: Temporal interval for evidence admissibility
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to deny evidence
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: denial of evidence
logic summary: Denial of evidence as a reason for inadmissibility
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: Temporal relation for evidence admissibility
premise text: (6) However, evidence of a matter is not admissible under this section if, had the absent witness been called as a witness in the cross-examination, and denied the matter.
conclusion text: Evidence of the matter would not have been admissible if adduced by the cross-examining party.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318B Objection to admission of statements made at examination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318b
has part: 318B(1) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
has part: 318B(2) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49

318B(1) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1
part of: 318B Objection to admission of statements made at examination
note: Party must give written notice before applying for admission of statements in evidence.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Party has an obligation to give written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318B(2) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2
part of: 318B Objection to admission of statements made at examination
note: Notice must set out or be accompanied by a written record of specified statements.
description: written record
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318B(2) Objection to admission of statements made at examination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-318b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
has part: 44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50

44(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Object to specified statements being admitted in evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits admitting statements in evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may extend period before proceeding is heard or by agreement between parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Must provide objection notice and record to court upon receiving an objection notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Receiving an objection notice
conclusion text: Provide objection notice and record to court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may determine objections before or after hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court obligation to determine objections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7
part of: 44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Other party cannot object to statement being admitted in evidence unless objected to or given leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on objecting
premise text: Other party has not objected to the statement being so admitted.
conclusion text: Cannot object to the statement being so admitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-166
note: Sections 318A and 318B apply to statements made at an examination or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.51
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-166-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-166-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-166-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-166-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm

167 Subsection 19(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-167
note: Omit 'indictable' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-167-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits 'indictable'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-168
note: Section applies in relation to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-168-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-168-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section applies to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 Subsection 337(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-169
note: Repeal subsection 337(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-169-norm

170 After subsection 337(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-170
note: Disregard effect of orders on property control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-170-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 170 After subsection 337(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disregard orders
premise text: None
conclusion text: Property control disregarded
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 At the end of section 337
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-171
note: Property may be subject to effective control of more than one person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-171-norm

172 Paragraph 337A(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-172
note: Insert *production order, *search warrant before “restraining”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-172-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-172-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits insertion of *production order, *search warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173 Paragraph 337A(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-173
note: Insert specific terms after 'freezing order'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-173-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-173-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-173-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits insertion of terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174 Subsection 337A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-174
note: Repeal subsection 337A(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.53
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-174-norm

175 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-175
note: Section 337A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 applies to applications made on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.53
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-175-norm

176 Section 338 (definition of discretionary trust)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-176
note: Repeal the definition of discretionary trust.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.53
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-176-norm

177 Section 338 (paragraph (b) of the definition of evidential
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-177
note: Insert “, a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern” after ‘offence’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.53
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-177-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-177-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the insertion of a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern after ‘offence’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-178
note: Commencement of amendment applies to search warrants issued on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.53
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-178-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-178-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-178-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179 Section 338 (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179
note: Defines serious offence as a series of indictable offences with a value threshold
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.53
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-179-norm

48 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm

180 Section 338 (paragraph (a) of the definition of tainted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180
note: Insert “, a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern” after ‘offence’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-180-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-180-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the insertion of a foreign indictable offence or an indictable offence of Commonwealth concern after ‘offence’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-181
note: Amendment applies in relation to search warrants applied for on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-181-norm

182 Section 338 (paragraph (b) of the definition of unlawful
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182
note: Omit specific phrase from definition of unlawful activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-182-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
premise text: Omitting the phrase is not allowed
conclusion text: The phrase must be included
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 At the end of subsection 45(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-183
note: New trial ordered in relation to offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-183-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-183-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183 At the end of subsection 45(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide new trial
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184
note: Section applies in relation to restraining orders applied for on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-184-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-184-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-184-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-184-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to restraining orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185 Section 84
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-185-norm

act-sch-1-sec-185-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185 Section 84
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

186 At the end of section 84
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-186
note: Requirement satisfaction condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-186-norm

act-sch-1-sec-186-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 At the end of section 84
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

187 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187
note: Applicability of Section 84 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-187-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188 Subsection 85(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-188
note: Substitute section 84(1)(a) for section 84(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-188-norm

50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm

189 Subsection 85(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-189
note: Omit '84(b)', substitute '84(1)(b)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-189-norm

190 Section 110
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-190
note: Insert '(1)' before 'The court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-190-norm

act-sch-1-sec-190-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190 Section 110
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

191 At the end of section 110
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-191
note: Requirement satisfaction assumption
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-191-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-191-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-191-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191 At the end of section 110
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-191-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Obligation implication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

192 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-192
note: Commencement of section 110 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-192-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-192-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-1-sec-192-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
premise text: Commencement is on or after the specified date
conclusion text: The commencement date is specified in section 110
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193 Subsection 111(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-193
note: Substitute section heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-193-norm

194 Subsection 111(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-194
note: Omit “110(b)”, substitute “110(1)(b)”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-194-norm

195 Paragraph 316(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-195
note: Omit specific phrase from proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-195-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-195-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting a phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Paragraph 316(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-196
note: Repeal paragraph 316(2)(b) and substitute with a new provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-196-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-196-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-196-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the repeal of paragraph 316(2)(b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-197
note: Section applies in relation to proceedings under Chapter 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.57
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-197-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 197 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section applies to proceedings under Chapter 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm

198 Subsection 296(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-198
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-198-norm

199 Subsection 297(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-199
note: Change wording of a subsection heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-199-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-199-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-199-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace text with alternative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

200 Subsection 297(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-200
note: Repeal subsection 297(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-200-norm

200A Subsection 298(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-200a
note: Omit 'in a particular financial year'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-200a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-200a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-200a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201 Section 299
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-201
note: Repeal a section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-201-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-201-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-201-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Section 338 (definition of distributable funds)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-202
note: Repeal definition of distributable funds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-202-norm

203 Section 338 (definition of suspended funds)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-203
note: Repeal the definition of suspended funds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-203-norm

204 At the end of subsection 296(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-204
note: Addition of certain legislative references
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-204-norm

205 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-205
note: Applicable to amounts paid on or after commencement of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.59
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-205-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-205-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-205-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-205-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applicable to amounts paid on or after commencement of Division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206 At the end of section 55
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-206
note: Specify amount by reference to proportion of difference between forfeited interests and payments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.59
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-206-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Specify amount by reference to proportion of difference between forfeited interests and payments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-206-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207 After paragraph 297(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-207
note: Mandatory payment by Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.59
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-207-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-207-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207 After paragraph 297(1)(f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make payments
premise text: Section 72
conclusion text: Obligation to pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

208 Paragraph 297(1)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-208
note: Prohibit making payments under an arrangement under paragraph 88(1)(b) or subsection 289(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.59
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-208-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-2
note: No specific obligation or prohibition stated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.60
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm

209 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-209
note: Applicable paragraphs of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.60
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-209-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-209-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-209-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 209 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicable paragraphs of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210 After paragraph (ya) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-210
note: DPP must apply for order under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.61
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-210-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-210-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210 After paragraph (ya) of Schedule 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to apply for order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-211
note: Commencement of amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.61
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-211-norm

212 Paragraph 142(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-212
note: Insertion of '(other than an encumbrance in which the person referred to paragraph (1)(a) has an interest)' after 'property'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.61
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-212-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of a specific phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213 Paragraph 169(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-213
note: Insertion of a condition into the definition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.61
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-213-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-213-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of a condition into the definition of property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214 Part 4-4 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-214
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.61
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-214-norm

215 Paragraph 302(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-215
note: Insertion of '(other than an encumbrance in which the person who is liable to pay the amount has an interest)' after 'property'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.61
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-215-norm

56 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-56-2-norm

216 Division 2 of Part 4-4 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-216
note: Repeal the heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-216-norm

217 Paragraph 302C(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-217
note: Insertion of a specific condition into the definition of property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-217-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-217-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-217-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a new clause into an existing definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218 Paragraph 307(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-218
note: Insertion of '(other than an encumbrance in which the person convicted of the offence has an interest)' after 'property'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-218-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-218-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-218-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of a specific phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219
note: Application of certain sections of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to charges created on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-219-norm

220 After section 315
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-220
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-220-norm

315A Court may hear multiple applications at same time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-315a
note: Court may hear multiple applications at the same time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-315a-norm
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-315a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-1-sec-315a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 315A Court may hear multiple applications at same time
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-1-sec-315a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court obligation to hear multiple applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-221
note: Application of Section 315A to applications made on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-221-norm

1 Subsection 3C(1) (definition of magistrate)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Definition of magistrate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 Section 3CA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Omit '3ZW' and substitute '3ZQZ'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-norm

3 Subsection 3F(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3-norm

4 Paragraph 3L(1B)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with condition for data no longer required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Paragraph 3L(1B)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsections 3UF(4) to (7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 3UF(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 Section 3UG
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 3UK(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Omit sections 3UF and 3UG, substitute section 3UF.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 After Division 4B of Part IAA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Insert Schedule 2 Search warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.63
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-norm

58 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.64
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-norm

60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
note: Preventing, investigating or prosecuting an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Preventing, investigating or prosecuting an offence.
premise text: (c) preventing, investigating or prosecuting an offence against a law of a State or Territory;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Proceedings under a corresponding law.
premise text: (d) proceedings under a corresponding law (within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 or the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Forfeiture of the thing under a law of a State or Territory.
premise text: (e) proceedings for the forfeiture of the thing under a law of a State or Territory;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Deciding whether to institute proceedings or to take any other action.
premise text: (f) deciding whether to institute proceedings or to take any other action mentioned in any of paragraphs (1)(a) to (l), inclusive, subsection (2) or (3) or paragraph (c), (d) or (e) of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
has part: 62(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 62(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68

62(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: The Commonwealth must pay reasonable compensation for damage or corruption. Commissioner does not have to take steps if proceedings are instituted before end of 60 days or thing is retained due to an order under section 3ZQZ. Commissioner does not have to take steps if thing may be retained, destroyed or disposed of under a law or court order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay reasonable compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: Exemption from taking steps
premise text: Proceedings instituted before end of 60 days
conclusion text: Commissioner does not have to take steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: Exemption from taking steps due to retention order
premise text: Thing is retained because of an order under section 3ZQZ
conclusion text: Commissioner does not have to take steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: Exemption from taking steps due to other circumstances
premise text: Other circumstances
conclusion text: Commissioner does not have to take steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

62(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-3
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Owner/user may seek compensation from Commonwealth if agreement fails.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-4
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Occupier must provide warning or guidance on equipment operation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Occupier has an obligation to provide warning or guidance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-5
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-6
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Defines damage in relation to data for the purpose of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy
logic summary: Describes the concept of damage in relation to data
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Return seized items to rightful owner or person from whom they were seized. Return seized items to rightful owner or person within 60 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commissioner to return seized items.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to return seized items
premise text: Commissioner's satisfaction
conclusion text: Return item to rightful owner or person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
has part: 64(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 64(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 64(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 64(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70

64(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Commissioner may apply for retention of seized thing Commissioner may apply to a magistrate for an order in relation to the thing. Commissioner must return a thing seized under Division 3A if owner requests its return.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(1) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to retain seized thing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to return a thing seized under Division 3A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard in determining an application by the Commissioner. Commissioner does not have to take steps if certain conditions are met. Magistrate may order retention of thing for specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Commissioner exempt from taking steps if certain conditions are met.
premise text: The Commissioner does not have to take those steps if...
conclusion text: ...the thing is likely to be used by the owner or another person in the commission of a terrorist act, a terrorism offence or a serious offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Commissioner exempt from taking steps if certain conditions are met.
premise text: The Commissioner does not have to take those steps if...
conclusion text: ...the thing is being used, or is required to be used, for a purpose mentioned in section 3ZQU or for other judicial or administrative review proceedings;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to retain thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

64(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-3
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Magistrate may order retention of thing for specified period. Commissioner must notify persons with interest in thing before making application. Return of seized thing within 90 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-7

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to retain thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commissioner must perform actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to return seized thing
premise text: The owner requests the return of the thing.
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >P
logic summary: Time interval for return request
premise text: If subsection 3UF(2) applied in relation to the thing so that a seizure notice was not served—within 90 days after the day on which the thing was seized.
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner within 90 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >P
logic summary: Time interval for return request
premise text: (i) within 90 days after the date of the seizure notice served under section 3UF in relation to the thing; or (ii) if subsection 3UF(2) applied in relation to the thing so that a seizure notice was not served—within 90 days after the day on which the thing was seized.
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner within 90 days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to apply for magistrate order if not returned
premise text: (b) The thing has not been returned to the owner by the end of the 90th day;
conclusion text: The Commissioner must apply to a magistrate for an order under section 3ZQZB.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to return thing if requested
premise text: (a) The owner of a thing requests the return of the thing:
conclusion text: The Commissioner must take reasonable steps to return the thing to the owner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-ss-4
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Magistrate may permit a thing seized under Division 3A to be retained, forfeited etc. Return of thing suspected to be used in commission of crime is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between seizure and retention
premise text: (seizure under Division 3A) (retention)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
has part: 66(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 66(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72

66(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-ss-5
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Magistrate must order thing be returned to owner if not satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must order thing be returned to owner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-ss-6
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Definition of terrorist act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-66-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
premise text: None
conclusion text: terrorist act has the same meaning as in subsection 100.1(1) of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Sections 3ZV and 3ZW
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-norm

3ZW Delegation by Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3zw
note: Delegation of powers by Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3zw-norm

11 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Amendments apply to things seized or documents produced before, on, or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
premise text: Amendments made by this Part
conclusion text: apply in relation to things seized or documents produced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap for application scope
premise text: before, on or after commencement of this Part
conclusion text: commencement of this Part
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subparagraph 3K(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Grant permission for executing officer or constable to assist suspects on reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.73
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Subparagraph 3K(2)(a)(ii)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 After subsection 3K(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Executing officer need not comply with certain conditions under reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.73
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 After subsection 3K(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Executing officer has an obligation to comply with certain conditions.
premise text: Executing officer is required to comply with paragraph (3)(a) or (b)
conclusion text: Executing officer need not comply if reasonable grounds exist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Reasonable grounds exist during certain time intervals
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist if the condition is met during a specific time interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsections 3K(3A) and (3B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Omit '72 hours', substitute '14 days'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.73
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-norm

15 After subsection 3K(3C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: A single extension cannot exceed 7 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.73
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 After subsection 3K(3C)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits extensions exceeding 7 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 3L(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Executing officer or constable may operate electronic equipment to access data at warrant premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.73
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Subsection 3L(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Electronic equipment operation is allowed during warrant execution.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-norm

17 Subsection 3L(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Omit specific phrase from data access clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Paragraphs 3L(1A)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Omit specific text from data accessed by electronic equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-norm

19 Subsection 3L(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Omit “believes”, substitute ‘suspects’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-norm

20 Section 3LA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
has part: 20(1) Section 3LA
has part: 20(2) Section 3LA
has part: 20(3) Section 3LA
has part: 20(4) Section 3LA
has part: 20(5) Section 3LA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74

20(1) Section 3LA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Section 3LA
note: Executing officer or constable may operate electronic equipment to access data.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Section 3LA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Section 3LA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Section 3LA
note: Permission to copy data accessed by operating electronic equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Section 3LA
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(3) Section 3LA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-3
part of: 20 Section 3LA
note: Remove and destroy data from Australian Federal Police control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of data retention
premise text: (3) If the Commissioner is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...the destruction of any other reproduction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(4) Section 3LA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-4
part of: 20 Section 3LA
note: Permit search and seizure of equipment under warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(4) Section 3LA
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to search and seize equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(5) Section 3LA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-5
part of: 20 Section 3LA
note: Seizure of equipment under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(5) Section 3LA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizure without specified conditions.
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...
conclusion text: ...only if: (a) it is not practicable to copy the data...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure.
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...
conclusion text: ...only if: (a) it is not practicable to copy the data...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for seizure.
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...
conclusion text: ...only if: (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses seizure conditions to occupants.
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...
conclusion text: ...only if: (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes seizure conditions in occupants.
premise text: (5) A constable may seize equipment...
conclusion text: ...only if: (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3LA Person with knowledge of a computer or a computer system to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3la
note: A constable may apply to a magistrate for an order requiring a specified person to provide information or assistance.
description: reasonable and necessary information or assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.75
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3la-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3la-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-3la-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3LA Person with knowledge of a computer or a computer system to
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-3la-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information or assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
has part: 70(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 70(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 70(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76

70(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-2
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Grant order if certain conditions are met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Magistrate can grant order if conditions are met
premise text: Reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material is held in or accessible from the computer or data storage device
conclusion text: Magistrate may grant the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Grant order during reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material is held in or accessible from the computer or data storage device
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;
conclusion text: The order may be granted during this time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Grant order until reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material is held in or accessible from the computer or data storage device
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;
conclusion text: The order may be granted until this condition is met
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Magistrate must grant order if conditions are met
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;
conclusion text: The magistrate must grant the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Magistrate can refuse to grant order if conditions are not met
premise text: (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied that: ... (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer or data storage device;
conclusion text: The magistrate can refuse to grant the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-3
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Order does not have effect on or after seizure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits order from having effect on or after seizure.
premise text: (3) If: ... the order does not have effect on or after the seizure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Order is not effective on or after seizure, but other orders can specify conditions.
premise text: (3) If: ... the order does not have effect on or after the seizure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses application for another order under this section relating to computer or data storage device.
premise text: (3) If: ... An application for another order under this section relating to the computer or data storage device may be made after the seizure.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inferential relationship between seizure and order effectiveness.
premise text: (3) If: ... the order does not have effect on or after the seizure.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: Validates application for another order under this section relating to computer or data storage device.
premise text: (3) If: ... An application for another order under this section relating to the computer or data storage device may be made after the seizure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-4
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Specify period, place, and conditions for providing information or assistance.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specification of period, place, and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-ss-5
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Failure to comply with an order is a criminal offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Paragraph 3LB(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Inserts 'or 3LAA(1)' after subsection 3L(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.77
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-norm

22 Paragraph 3LB(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Inserts additional clause into subsection 3L(1A) or (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.77
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-norm

23 Section 3M
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.77
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-norm

3M Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3m
has part: 3M(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
has part: 3M(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.77

3M(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1
part of: 3M Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
note: Compensation for damage to electronic equipment when insufficient care is exercised in selecting or operating the equipment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.77
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3M(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for damage caused by insufficient care.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Compensation is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3M(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2
part of: 3M Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
note: The Commonwealth must pay reasonable compensation for damage to electronic equipment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.77
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3M(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-3m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
has part: 72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78

72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-3
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Owner/user may seek compensation from Commonwealth if agreement fails.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
premise text: Owner/user seeks compensation
conclusion text: Commonwealth must provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-4
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Occupier must provide warning or guidance on equipment operation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-5
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-ss-6
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Defines damage in relation to data for the purpose of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-72-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy
logic summary: Describes the concept of damage in relation to data
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Paragraph 3N(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Insertion of section reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-norm

25 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-2-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 3 (paragraph (b) of the definition of complementary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Substitute 'under section 3AA' for 'by the Minister by notice published in the Gazette'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.79
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 3 (paragraph (b) of the definition of complementary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace 'by the Minister by notice published in the Gazette' with 'under section 3AA'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Definition of current NWPP identity for a participant at a particular time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.79
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 3
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Participant identity
conclusion text: NWPP identity
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Subclass relationship
premise text: NWPP identity (a)
conclusion text: NWPP identity (b)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Defines former NWPP identity for a participant at a particular time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.79
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defined
logic summary: Defines former NWPP identity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedClass
logic summary: Defines a class of identities
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Definition of former participant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.79
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Witness protection schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.79
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-5-norm

74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-74
note: Definition of Immigration Secretary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-74-norm

6 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Defines personal information for identity purposes
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-3-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide personal info
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classifies personal info for identity purposes
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Defines original identity in relation to a participant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a descriptive clause.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 3 (definition of participant)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Defines participant as including a former participant unless contrary intention appears.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-8-norm

act-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Section 3 (definition of participant)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Definition of 'State offence that has a federal aspect'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires relation
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: section 3AB
conclusion text: section 3AB
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Definition of State participant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-3-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of State participant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: State participant is a participant in relation to a State offence
conclusion text: State participant is a subclass of participant
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: State participant relates to a commission or inquiry under a law of a State
conclusion text: State participant occurs during the commission or inquiry
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Definition of Territory participant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.81
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-11-norm

act-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 3 (paragraph (e) of the definition of witness)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Replace 'such a person' with 'a person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.81
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: omission
logic summary: Omission of 'such a person'
premise text: Definition of witness
conclusion text: Revised definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 After section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.81
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-13-norm

3AA Declaration of complementary witness protection law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3aa
note: Minister may declare a law to be complementary witness protection law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.81
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3aa-norm

3AB State offence that has a federal aspect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3ab
note: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.81
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3AB State offence that has a federal aspect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between investigation and offence
premise text: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002
conclusion text: Investigated by Australian Crime Commission during the same period as the offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: and
logic summary: Combination of conditions for State offence with a federal aspect
premise text: Section 4AA Australian Federal Police Act 1979 and Section 4A Australian Crime Commission Act 2002
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by both agencies
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation from investigation to offence
premise text: Investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by either agency
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-3ab-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Cognitive processing of investigation and offence relation
premise text: Investigated by Australian Federal Police or Australian Crime Commission
conclusion text: Offence is taken to be a State offence with a federal aspect if investigated by either agency
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-76
note: Federal aspect applies if certain sections apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-76-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Either of the sections referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) were to apply.
conclusion text: Federal aspect applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14 At the end of section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Participant definition clarification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 At the end of section 8
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: clarifies
logic summary: Clarifies participant definition
premise text: None
conclusion text: Participant does not include a former participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 At the end of section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
has part: 15(8) At the end of section 9
has part: 15(9) At the end of section 9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82

15(8) At the end of section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15-ss-8
part of: 15 At the end of section 9
note: Participant definition clarification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(8) At the end of section 9
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: clarifies
logic summary: Clarifies participant definition
premise text: None
conclusion text: Participant does not include a former participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(9) At the end of section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15-ss-9
part of: 15 At the end of section 9
note: Continuation of obligation after former participant ceases to be included in NWPP.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continuation of obligation
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-15-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Continuation of obligation during time period
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, subsection (8) does not affect any obligation...
conclusion text: The obligation continues to have effect after the former participant ceased to be included in the NWPP.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Paragraph 11(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Insert 'for each new identity' after 'name'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-16-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Paragraph 11(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Insertion of text
premise text: Text to be inserted
conclusion text: Obligation to insert
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Paragraph 11(3)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new date for former participants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-17-norm

18 Paragraph 11(5)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
note: Omit section 19(2) and substitute with section 19(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-18-norm

19 At the end of section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Excludes a person from being considered a former participant due to subsection 13(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 At the end of section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excludes a person from being considered a former participant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Paragraph 13(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
note: Permits persons in designated positions to acquire and use assumed identities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-20-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-20-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Paragraph 13(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Paragraph 13(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
note: Replace phrase with alternative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-21-norm

22 At the end of section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
has part: 22(5) At the end of section 13
has part: 22(6) At the end of section 13
has part: 22(7) At the end of section 13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83

22(5) At the end of section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-5
part of: 22 At the end of section 13
note: Commissioner may take actions for protection of former participant or other person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(5) At the end of section 13
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner may take actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(6) At the end of section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-6
part of: 22 At the end of section 13
note: If Commissioner takes action under subsection (5) in respect of a person other than a former participant, this Act applies to the person as if the person were a former participant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(6) At the end of section 13
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Commissioner takes action under subsection (5)
conclusion text: This Act applies to the person as if the person were a former participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

22(7) At the end of section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-7
part of: 22 At the end of section 13
note: Written notice must be given to the Immigration Secretary
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Written notice must be given to the Immigration Secretary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Subparagraph 14(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
note: Insertion of word 'original' before 'identity'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-23-norm

78 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-78
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-78-norm

24 Subsection 15(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
note: Substitute 'original identity or a former NWPP identity'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-24-norm

act-sch-3-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Subsection 15(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

25 Paragraph 16(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
note: Substitute “original identity or a former NWPP” for “former”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Paragraph 16(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
note: Substitute 'the original identity or the former NWPP' for 'his or her former'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-26-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces a phrase with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
note: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: replacement
logic summary: Replacement of terms
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'
conclusion text: New term replaces old one
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between terms
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'
conclusion text: New term relates to old one temporally
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of terms
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'
conclusion text: New term traces back to old one
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of terms
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'
conclusion text: New term diffuses from old one
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: substitution
logic summary: Substitution of terms in AI context
premise text: Replace 'his or her former' with 'the original identity or the former NWPP'
conclusion text: New term substitutes old one in AI context
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 16(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
note: Substitute 'original identity or any former NWPP' for 'former'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-norm

29 Subsection 16(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
note: Substitute 'current NWPP' for 'new'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 16(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
note: Replace 'former' with 'original identity or any former NWPP'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-30-norm

31 Subsection 16(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-31-norm

32 Section 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
note: Substitute 'original identity or any former NWPP identity' for 'former identity'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-32-norm

act-sch-3-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Section 17
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

33 Subsection 18(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
note: Replace heading and note 1, insert note 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-33-norm

34 Subparagraph 18(1)(b)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
note: Replace 'protection and assistance for the participant' with 'the participant's inclusion in the NWPP'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-34-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsection 18(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
note: Substitute phrase in subsection 18(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-35-norm

act-sch-3-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Subsection 18(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

36 Subsection 18(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
note: Termination of NWPP protection and assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-36-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits termination of NWPP protection and assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 After subsection 18(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
note: Protection and assistance must be terminated by the Commissioner if requested in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-37-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-37-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 After subsection 18(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory termination
premise text: The person requests in writing that the protection and assistance be terminated.
conclusion text: The Commissioner must terminate the protection and assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-80
note: Deputy Commissioner must notify person of termination decision
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-80-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Duty to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Subsection 18(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection 18(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-38-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Paragraphs 18(4)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
note: Replace 'participant' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-39-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Paragraphs 18(4)(b) and (c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace 'participant' with 'person'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Subsection 18(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40
note: Termination decision cannot be made without a person's involvement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-40-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of termination decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-41
note: Substitute 'person's' for 'participant's'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-41-norm

act-sch-3-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

42 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
note: Substitute 'person' for 'participant'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-42-norm

act-sch-3-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Subparagraph 18(5)(a)(ii)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

43 Paragraphs 18(5)(b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-43
note: Replace 'participant' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-43-norm

act-sch-3-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Paragraphs 18(5)(b), (c), (d) and (e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

44 Subsection 18(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-44
note: Written notice of termination decision must be given to Immigration Secretary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-44-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 At the end of section 18
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-45
note: Participant definition exclusion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-45-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 At the end of section 18
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude former participants from the term participant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subsection 19(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-46
note: Restore original identity if necessary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-46-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Dependent on discretion of Deputy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-46-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Action taken during NWPP identity provision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Subsection 19(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47
note: Omit 'former'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-47-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to omit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Subsection 19(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-48
note: Substitute specific identity terms in subsection 19(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-48-norm

act-sch-3-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Subsection 19(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

49 Subsections 19(5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-49
note: Notice to participant under subsection (6) upon restoration of identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-49-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notice obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-82
has part: 82(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 82(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88

82(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-82-ss-6
part of: 82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Participant must return documents within 10 days of notice.
description: Documents related to current and former NWPP identities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Participant must return documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-82-ss-7
part of: 82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Refusal to comply with notice results in offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits refusal to comply with notice.
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: Penalty: 10 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice and refusal.
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The notice and refusal occur at the same time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace of refusal.
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The person's refusal is recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of refusal across time.
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The refusal diffuses across time.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-82-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of refusal as offence.
premise text: (7) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is given a notice under subsection (6); and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The refusal is recognized as an offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Paragraph 20(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-50
note: Substitute current NWPP identity or current location
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-50-norm

act-sch-3-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Paragraph 20(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

51 Section 21
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-51
note: Insertion of 'or the performance or purported performance' after 'conferred'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-51-norm

act-sch-3-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51 Section 21
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

52 Section 22
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-52
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-52-norm

22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2
has part: 22(1) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
has part: 22(2) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
has part: 22(3) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88

22(1) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1
part of: 22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
note: Disclosing information about an individual who is a participant in the NWPP program can result in imprisonment for 2 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about an individual who is a participant in the NWPP program.
premise text: The person discloses information about an individual; and
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure of information and assessment as a participant.
premise text: the individual has a current NWPP identity at the time the information is disclosed and the information is about...
conclusion text: ...and (i) the individual has a current NWPP identity at the time the information is disclosed and the information is about...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure of information and assessment as a participant.
premise text: there is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is a participant.
conclusion text: ...and (ii) there is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is a participant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
logic summary: Information flow from disclosure to assessment as a participant.
premise text: the person discloses information about an individual; and
conclusion text: ...and the person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of individuals as participants in the NWPP program.
premise text: the individual is a Commonwealth participant or a Territory participant; and
conclusion text: ...and (d) either or both of the following apply:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2
part of: 22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
note: Disclosing information about an individual undergoing assessment for NWPP inclusion may be an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about individuals undergoing NWPP assessment
premise text: Disclosure of information may reveal individual's assessment status
conclusion text: Offence committed if disclosure occurs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and NWPP assessment
premise text: Assessment for NWPP inclusion occurs at a specific time
conclusion text: Disclosure of information may reveal individual's assessment status at that time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and NWPP assessment
premise text: Disclosure of information may be repeated
conclusion text: Offence committed if disclosure occurs repeatedly
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(3) Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3
part of: 22 Offences relating to Commonwealth or Territory participants
note: Disclosing information about a participant without proper clearance is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about a participant.
premise text: Disclosing information about an individual is an offence if the individual is a participant.
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about a participant without proper clearance is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and risk of revealing participant status.
premise text: There is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is a participant if they have a current NWPP identity.
conclusion text: The temporal relation between disclosure and risk of revealing participant status is relevant to the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and compromise of security.
premise text: There is a risk that disclosure of the information will compromise the security of the individual.
conclusion text: The recurring trace of disclosure and compromise of security is relevant to the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about participant status.
premise text: Disclosing information about an individual is an offence if the individual is a participant.
conclusion text: The diffusion of information about participant status is relevant to the offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of participant status.
premise text: An individual is classified as a participant if they have a current NWPP identity.
conclusion text: The knowledge representation of participant status is based on the NWPP identity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-84
has part: 84(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 84(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 84(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 84(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90

84(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-4
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosing information about an individual undergoing NWPP assessment can lead to imprisonment for 10 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about an individual undergoing NWPP assessment.
premise text: (a) the person discloses information about an individual; and (b) the individual is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP at the time the information is disclosed;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that could compromise the security of the individual.
premise text: (d) there is a risk that disclosure of the information will reveal that the individual is undergoing such assessment;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that could lead to the individual being included in the NWPP.
premise text: (c) if the individual were included in the NWPP following that assessment, the individual would be a Commonwealth participant or a Territory participant;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about an individual who is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP.
premise text: (b) the individual is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP at the time the information is disclosed;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-5
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
premise text: (5) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-6
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Absolute liability applies to certain crimes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Imposes obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-84-ss-7
part of: 84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3) or (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-84-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to convict
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

22A Offences relating to State participants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22a
has part: 22A(1) Offences relating to State participants
has part: 22A(2) Offences relating to State participants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.91

22A(1) Offences relating to State participants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1
part of: 22A Offences relating to State participants
note: Disclosing information about an individual who is a participant or has a current NWPP identity can be an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.91
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 22A(1) Offences relating to State participants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
premise text: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant; or (iii) a State participant; or (iv) a Territory participant; or (v) any other person;
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disclosure and assessment as State participant.
premise text: (f) if the person disclosing the information is a person other than a person referred to in subparagraph (a)(i), (ii) or (iv)—there is a risk that disclosure of the information will adversely affect the integrity of the NWPP.
conclusion text: There is an overlap between disclosure and assessment as State participant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
premise text: (b) the person discloses information about an individual;
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
premise text: (c) the individual is a participant;
conclusion text: There is a spread of disclosure of information about individuals who are participants or have a current NWPP identity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of individuals as participants or having a current NWPP identity.
premise text: (d) the individual is a State participant;
conclusion text: There is recognition of individuals as participants or having a current NWPP identity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22A(2) Offences relating to State participants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2
part of: 22A Offences relating to State participants
note: Committing an offence requires a person to be a Commonwealth officer or participant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.91
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22A(2) Offences relating to State participants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;
conclusion text: The person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Offence occurs during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;
conclusion text: The offence occurs during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Offence has a temporal relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;
conclusion text: The offence has a temporal relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Offence spreads during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;
conclusion text: The offence spreads during the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Offence has a cognitive relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is: (i) a Commonwealth officer; or (ii) a Commonwealth participant;
conclusion text: The offence has a cognitive relation to the period when the person is a Commonwealth officer or participant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-86
has part: 86(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 86(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 86(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92

86(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-86-ss-3
part of: 86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosing information about a participant without proper clearance is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Disclosure of information about a participant without proper clearance.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-86-ss-4
part of: 86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosing information about an individual undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP can lead to security compromise or integrity of NWPP.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Disclosing information can lead to security compromise or integrity of NWPP.
conclusion text: No disclosure allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-86-ss-5
part of: 86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosure by a person is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88
has part: 88(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94

88(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-6
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Absolute liability applies to certain crimes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Imposes obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-7
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3) or (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-88-ss-7-norm

22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b
has part: 22B(1) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
has part: 22B(2) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
has part: 22B(3) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94

22B(1) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1
part of: 22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
note: Disclosing certain information about the NWPP is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 22B(1) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information about the NWPP.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22B(2) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2
part of: 22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
note: Disclosing certain information about the NWPP is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 22B(2) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22B(3) Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3
part of: 22B Offences relating to disclosure of information about the NWPP
note: Disclosure exemptions for authorised persons, complaint purposes, and integrity commissioner referrals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation permits disclosure.
premise text: (a) the person has been authorised by the Commissioner to make the disclosure;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Complaint purposes permit disclosure.
premise text: (b) the disclosure is made for the purpose of making a complaint,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-22b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Integrity commissioner referrals permit disclosure.
premise text: (c) the disclosure is made for the purpose of referring to the Integrity Commissioner, under the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006, an allegation or information that raises a corruption issue;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-90
note: Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices issue is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-4

act-sch-3-sec-90-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Investigating or resolving an AFP conduct or practices issue is prohibited.
premise text: (ii) investigating or resolving an AFP conduct or practices issue under Part V of that Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (2) because of a risk that a disclosure will have a particular effect even if the disclosure does not actually have that effect.
premise text: (4) To avoid doubt, a person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (2) because of a risk that a disclosure will have a particular effect even if the disclosure does not actually have that effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disclosure and offence
premise text: (4) To avoid doubt, a person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (2) because of a risk that a disclosure will have a particular effect even if the disclosure does not actually have that effect.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22C Disclosures to courts, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22c
has part: 22C(1) Disclosures to courts, etc.
has part: 22C(2) Disclosures to courts, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96

22C(1) Disclosures to courts, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1
part of: 22C Disclosures to courts, etc.
note: Disclosures to courts and inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applyTo
logic summary: Applicable to disclosures of information
premise text: (a) a court or tribunal; or (b) a Royal Commission of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory or any other commission of inquiry.
conclusion text: Sections 22, 22A and 22B apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22C(2) Disclosures to courts, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22c-ss-2
part of: 22C Disclosures to courts, etc.
note: Does not affect the operation of subsection 26(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-22c-ss-2-norm

53 Subsection 25(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-53
note: Substitute "subsections (3) and (4)" for "subsection (3)"
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-53-norm

act-sch-3-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Subsection 25(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54 Subsection 25(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-54
note: Omit 'and 27', substitute ', 27 and 27A'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-54-norm

55 At the end of section 25
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-55
note: Delegation of Commissioner's powers and functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-55-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-linearlogic-2

act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Delegation of Commissioner's powers and functions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-55-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: <>
logic summary: Rank hierarchy
premise text: Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, or person occupying an equivalent or higher rank
conclusion text: ranked below the Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-56
note: Substitute Royal Commission wording
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-56-norm

57 Paragraphs 26(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-57
note: Insertion of phrase after 'duties'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-57-norm

58 After paragraph 26(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-58
note: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information about AFP employees involved in NWPP operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-3-sec-58-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58 After paragraph 26(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information.
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act.
conclusion text: The person must not divulge or communicate the information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Information disclosure is restricted during operation.
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;
conclusion text: The information disclosure is restricted during the operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Information disclosure is restricted until operation ends.
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;
conclusion text: The information disclosure is restricted until the operation ends.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
logic summary: No diffusion of information about AFP employees.
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;
conclusion text: There is no diffusion of information.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-58-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: none
logic summary: No AI processing of information about AFP employees.
premise text: The person has the information as a result of the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, under this Act;
conclusion text: There is no AI processing of information.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Paragraph 26(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-59
note: Substitute specific authorities with broader terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-59-norm

60 After paragraph 26(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-60
note: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information about AFP employees involved in NWPP operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-3-sec-60-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 After paragraph 26(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on divulging or communicating information.
premise text: Performance of functions or duties, or exercise of powers, in relation to this Act.
conclusion text: Divulging or communicating such information is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Disclosure is restricted during operation of NWPP.
premise text: The person has the information as a result of performance of functions or duties, or exercise of powers, in relation to this Act.
conclusion text: The disclosure is restricted during operation of NWPP.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-60-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Prohibition applies everywhere.
premise text: Performance of functions or duties, or exercise of powers, in relation to this Act.
conclusion text: The prohibition applies everywhere.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-92
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-92-norm

61 Subsection 26(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-61
note: Insert 'a State or a Territory' after 'Commonwealth'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-61-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of 'a State or a Territory'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Subsection 26(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-62
note: Omit “or a former participant”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-62-norm

63 Subsection 26(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-63
note: Omit “or former participant”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-63-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-63-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'or former participant'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Subsection 27(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-64
note: Participant must notify Commissioner if to be a witness in proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-64-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Subsection 27(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Subsection 27(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-65
note: Omit “or former participant”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-65-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'or former participant'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 After section 27
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-66
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-66-norm

27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a
has part: 27A(1) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
has part: 27A(2) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
has part: 27A(3) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98

27A(1) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1
part of: 27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
note: Participant must notify Commissioner of involvement in civil proceeding.
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(1) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(2) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2
part of: 27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
note: Commissioner may take action in circumstances after notification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(2) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to act
premise text: Commissioner notified
conclusion text: Action taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(3) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3
part of: 27A Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
note: Definition of civil proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(3) Requirement where participant involved in civil proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: civil proceeding is a class of proceedings
conclusion text: is a civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-67
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.99
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-67-norm

28 Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2
has part: 28(1) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
has part: 28(2) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.99

28(1) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1
part of: 28 Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
note: Disclose participant identity in court proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.99
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(1) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure of participant identity
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...disclose the original identity or a former NWPP identity...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosing participant identity
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...
conclusion text: ...disclose the fact that a person is such a participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosing assessment information
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...
conclusion text: ...disclose the fact that a person has undergone or is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP as such a participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and assessment
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...
conclusion text: ...the fact that a person has undergone or is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP as such a participant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure of assessment information
premise text: (1) This section applies if one of more of the following matters is in issue...
conclusion text: ...disclose the fact that a person has undergone or is undergoing assessment for inclusion in the NWPP as such a participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2
part of: 28 Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
note: Court must hold proceedings in private and make orders to suppress publication of evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.99
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(2) Identity of participant not to be disclosed in court proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hold proceedings in private
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make orders to suppress publication of evidence
premise text: (b) must make such orders relating to the suppression of publication of evidence given before it as, in its opinion, will ensure that the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) is not made public;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Two obligations combined
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission: (a) must, unless it considers that it is not in the interests of justice to do so, hold in private that part of the proceedings that relates to the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c); and (b) must make such orders relating to the suppression of publication of evidence given before it as, in its opinion, will ensure that the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c) is not made public;
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for obligation
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission: (a) must, unless it considers that it is not in the interests of justice to do so, hold in private that part of the proceedings that relates to the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c); and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure confidentiality
premise text: (2) The court, tribunal or commission: (a) must, unless it considers that it is not in the interests of justice to do so, hold in private that part of the proceedings that relates to the matter referred to in paragraph (1)(a), (b) or (c); and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-94
note: Sec 94: Prohibition on disclosure of certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-94-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-94-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28A Offence of contravening an order under section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28a
has part: 28A(1) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
has part: 28A(2) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100

28A(1) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1
part of: 28A Offence of contravening an order under section 28
note: Offence of contravening an order under section 28
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 28A(1) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order is in force under section 28;
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits engagement in conduct
premise text: (b) the person engages in conduct;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28A(2) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2
part of: 28A Offence of contravening an order under section 28
note: Avoids doubt on powers of the body that made the order under section 28.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28A(2) Offence of contravening an order under section 28
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Subsection 30(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-68
note: Substitute sections 27 and 27A for section 27.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-68-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-3-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Subsection 30(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to substitute sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Saving provision—declarations of complementary witness
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-69
note: A declaration made under paragraph (b) of the definition of complementary witness protection law is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.101
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-69-norm

act-sch-3-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Saving provision—declarations of complementary witness
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

70 Application—action in respect of former participants etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-70
note: Commencement of action under Witness Protection Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.101
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-70-norm

71 Application—non-disclosure of former identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-71
note: Applicability of Witness Protection Act 1994 to pre-commencement permissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.101
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-norm
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-5
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-6

act-sch-3-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Application—non-disclosure of former identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Obligation to apply the Act
premise text: The Act applies on and after its commencement.
conclusion text: The Act applies to pre-commencement permissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Classification of post-commencement and pre-commencement permissions
premise text: Post-commencement permission means a permission given under paragraph 16(1)(b) of the Witness Protection Act 1994, as in force at the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: Pre-commencement permission is classified as such.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between pre-commencement and post-commencement permissions
premise text: The Act applies on and after the commencement of this item in relation to a pre-commencement permission.
conclusion text: Pre-commencement permissions are affected by the Act's commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Recurring applicability of the Act to pre-commencement permissions
premise text: The Act applies on and after its commencement in relation to a pre-commencement permission.
conclusion text: The Act's applicability is recurring for pre-commencement permissions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply the Act to pre-commencement permissions
premise text: The Act applies on and after its commencement in relation to a pre-commencement permission.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to apply the Act to pre-commencement permissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-3-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Classification of post-commencement and pre-commencement permissions as such
premise text: Pre-commencement permission means a permission given under paragraph 16(1)(b) of the Witness Protection Act 1994 before the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: Pre-commencement permissions are classified as such.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-96
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-3-sec-96-norm

1 At the end of Chapter 9 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Addition of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-1-norm

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390
note: Defines terms used in the Division, including 'ancillary offence', 'associate', and 'child'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Division.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-98
has part: 98(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104

98(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-98-ss-2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Relationships of close family members are defined based on the definition of child.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-98-ss-3
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Clarifies references to organisations and persons in the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-3-norm

act-sch-4-sec-98-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-2
has part: 390(1) Section 390
has part: 390(2) Section 390
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.105

390(1) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Identify State offences with a federal aspect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.105
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(1) Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: State offence has a federal aspect.
premise text: (a) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the elements of the State offence;
conclusion text: State offences that have a federal aspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: State offences with a federal aspect must be identified.
premise text: (1) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect;
conclusion text: State offences with a federal aspect must be identified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The section applies during the commencement of the Act.
premise text: (1) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect because:
conclusion text: The section applies during the commencement of the Act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: The section applies and must be complied with.
premise text: (1) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect because:
conclusion text: The section applies and must be complied with
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

390(2) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2
part of: 390 Section 390
note: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.105
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(2) Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for the creation of the provision
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, a State offence has a federal aspect if...
conclusion text: The provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166 between the time it was created and now.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for the creation of the provision
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, a State offence has a federal aspect if...
conclusion text: The provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166 between the time it was created and now.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Conditional diffusion
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Conditional argumentation
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the CommonLaw Authoritative Act C2011C00166
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if it is not an ancillary offence and the provision creating it had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-100
has part: 100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106

100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-100-ss-3
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Specify acts or omissions in State offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Specificity
logic summary: Specify the acts or omissions involved
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: the specificity of the acts or omissions involved in committing a State offence is to be determined...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: Expresses a temporal relation between the circumstances and the acts/omissions
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: ...having regard to the circumstances in which the offence is committed...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Expresses a recurring trace between the circumstances and the acts/omissions
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: ...whether or not those circumstances are expressed to be elements of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits flexibility in specifying acts/omissions
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: ...the specificity of the acts or omissions involved in committing a State offence is to be determined...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on specifying acts/omissions
premise text: (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: ...the specificity of the acts or omissions involved in committing a State offence is to be determined...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

100(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-100-ss-4
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (2)(c) if the conduct constituting the State offence affects the interests of the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: The provision states that a State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (2)(c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-100-ss-5
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Does not limit paragraph (2)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-3
note: Associating in support of serious organised criminal activity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.107
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits associating in support of serious organised criminal activity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102
has part: 102(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(6A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 102(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108

102(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-2
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A person commits an offence if they associate with another person engaging in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law. Exempts conduct from punishment for related offenses within a 7-day window.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not associate with another person engaging in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law.
premise text: (a) the first person has previously been convicted of an offence against subsection (1); and (b) the first person associates with another person (the second person);
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if they associate with another person engaging in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the conviction and the association.
premise text: (a) the first person has previously been convicted of an offence against subsection (1); and (b) the first person associates with another person (the second person);
conclusion text: The conviction occurred before the association.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of the association and the conduct.
premise text: (c) the second person engages, or proposes to engage, in conduct (the second person’s conduct) that constitutes, or is part of conduct constituting, an offence against any law;
conclusion text: The association and the conduct are recurring traces.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not engage in conduct that constitutes an offence against any law.
premise text: (d) the association facilitates the engagement or proposed engagement by the second person in the second person’s conduct;
conclusion text: The first person is obligated not to facilitate the engagement or proposed engagement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-3
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Knowledge is a fault element for certain crimes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires knowledge as a fault element.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: knows
logic summary: Knowledge is a necessary condition for certain crimes.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Absolute liability for certain crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits absolute liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-4
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Prosecution need not prove identity of certain persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from proof
premise text: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (2)(f)
conclusion text: Prosecution need not prove identity of certain persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

102(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-5
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: No need to prove identity of persons in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prove identity
premise text: No obligation to prove identity in certain circumstances.
conclusion text: It is not necessary to prove the identity of any of the persons mentioned...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap for crimes legislation amendment
premise text: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
conclusion text: 2010 103
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-6
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Exemptions from the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the obligation to comply with the Act
premise text: The Act does not apply to an association if...
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exemptions and the Act
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of exemptions and the Act
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of exemptions through the Act
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of exemptions by AI systems
premise text: (6) This section does not apply to an association if...
conclusion text: ...the association is reasonable in the circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(6A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Limits on paragraph (6)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(6A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits the scope of paragraph (6)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-7
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Prohibition on conviction of certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids conviction of certain offences
premise text: (7) A person who is convicted of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102-ss-8
part of: 102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Exemption from application of section due to infringement on constitutional doctrine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts from application of section due to infringement on constitutional doctrine
premise text: Section does not apply to the extent it would infringe any constitutional doctrine
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption applies during infringement on constitutional doctrine
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption applies during infringement on constitutional doctrine
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption spreads to all cases where infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-102-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption applies during infringement on constitutional doctrine
premise text: Infringement on constitutional doctrine occurs before section applies
conclusion text: Section does not apply in this case
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-4
note: Providing material support or resources to a criminal organisation is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.109
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-104
has part: 104(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 104(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110

104(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-2
part of: 104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (f).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-3
part of: 104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A person may be convicted of an offence against subsection (1) if providing support or resources aids the organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: May be convicted
premise text: Providing support or resources aids the organisation
conclusion text: Conviction possible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5
has part: 390(1) Section 390
has part: 390(2) Section 390
has part: 390(3) Section 390
has part: 390(4) Section 390
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110

390(1) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Committing an offence against any law for the benefit of an organisation is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(1) Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence for the benefit of an organisation.
premise text: (a) the person commits an offence against any law (the underlying offence); and
conclusion text: (f) the underlying offence is a constitutionally covered offence punishable by imprisonment for at least 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390(2) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Organisation of 2 or more persons facilitating offence against law punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(2) Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Organisation of 2 or more persons facilitating offence against law.
premise text: (c) the organisation consists of 2 or more persons; (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;
conclusion text: Organisation of 2 or more persons facilitating offence against law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Organisation has 2 or more members between which offence is facilitated.
premise text: (c) the organisation consists of 2 or more persons; (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;
conclusion text: Organisation has 2 or more members between which offence is facilitated.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Offence against law is recurring trace.
premise text: (f) the underlying offence is a constitutionally covered offence punishable by imprisonment for at least 12 months;
conclusion text: Offence against law is recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Organisation diffuses engagement in conduct constituting an offence against law.
premise text: (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;
conclusion text: Organisation diffuses engagement in conduct constituting an offence against law.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: Section 390 recognises organisations with 2 or more members as facilitators of offences.
premise text: (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;
conclusion text: Section 390 recognises organisations with 2 or more members as facilitators of offences.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390(3) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3
part of: 390 Section 390
note: No fault element for physical elements of underlying offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Absolute liability
premise text: (3) There is no fault element...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390(4) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-4
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (f) and (2)(e) and (f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-5-ss-4-norm

106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-106
has part: 106(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 106(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 106(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112

106(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-106-ss-5
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Conviction not required for underlying offence discharge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to convict
premise text: Section 19B discharge order
conclusion text: Conviction not required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-106-ss-6
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: No prosecution for conduct already punished abroad.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If convicted or acquitted of a foreign offence, cannot be prosecuted.
premise text: Conviction or acquittal of a foreign offence
conclusion text: No prosecution for that conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-106-ss-7
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Conviction possible if organisation benefits from underlying offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-106-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to convict if organisation benefits
premise text: Underlying offence likely to result in organisation benefits
conclusion text: Conviction possible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-6
note: Must provide a benefit even if not received.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a benefit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7
has part: 390(1) Section 390
has part: 390(2) Section 390
has part: 390(3) Section 390
has part: 390(4) Section 390
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112

390(1) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Directing activities of an organisation that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(1) Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Directing activities that aid or risk aiding conduct constituting an offence against any law.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390(2) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 years is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is prohibited.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is prohibited.
premise text: (d) the organisation’s aims or activities include facilitating the engagement in conduct, or engaging in conduct, constituting an offence against any law that is, or would if committed be, for the benefit of the organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is prohibited.
premise text: (f) the offence against any law mentioned in paragraph (b) is a constitutionally covered offence punishable by imprisonment for at least 12 months.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is between a prohibited activity and the person committing an offence.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Directing activities constituting an offence against any law is a recurring prohibited activity.
premise text: (a) the person directs one or more activities of an organisation;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390(3) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Absolute liability applies to paragraphs (1)(e) and (f) and (2)(e) and (f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(3) Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability applies
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (1)(e) and (f) and (2)(e) and (f)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

390(4) Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4
part of: 390 Section 390
note: Conviction possible even if activity does not aid the organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(4) Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to convict
premise text: Conviction possible even if activity does not aid the organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-108
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-108-norm

390 Section 390
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-390-8
note: Extended geographical jurisdiction applies to an offence against this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-390-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-390-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390 Section 390
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-390-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Indicates the applicability of a rule or provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Defines federal aspect in section 390.2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-2-norm

3 Application of sections 390.3, 390.4, 390.5 and 390.6 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Sections apply if conduct occurred after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Application of sections 390.3, 390.4, 390.5 and 390.6 of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 After subsection 5D(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Offences against Division 390 of the Criminal Code are serious offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Insertion of 'against a law' into the definition of an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
note: Inserts 'wholly or partly' after 'that is' in the definition of proceeds of crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Inserts
logic summary: Adds a specific word to the definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
note: Insertion of 'against a law' into definition of proceeds of crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-3-norm

4 Section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-4-norm

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-400
note: Definition of dealing with money or other property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-400-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400 Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition defines a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-400-2
note: Application of offences relating to possible instruments of crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-400-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400 Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applies to sections 400.3, 400.4, 400.5
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-400-3
note: Prohibition on money laundering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-400-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 400 Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits money laundering
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-110
has part: 110(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 110(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 110(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 110(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116

110(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-2
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Circumstances must exist for sections to apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Circumstances exist
conclusion text: Sections apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-3
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Prohibition on using money or property to facilitate serious and organised crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the use of money or property to facilitate serious and organised crime
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-4
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Dealing with money or property under specified circumstances is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the scope of the prohibition.
conclusion text: The dealing with money or property occurs under specified circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbidden
logic summary: States that the dealing is prohibited.
conclusion text: The dealing with money or property is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-110-ss-5
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Absolute liability applies to subsections (3) and (4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-5-norm

6 At the end of subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-6-norm

act-sch-5-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 At the end of subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-7-norm

8 At the end of subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-8-norm

act-sch-5-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 At the end of subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 400.5(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-9-norm

10 At the end of subsection 400.5(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-10-norm

act-sch-5-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 At the end of subsection 400.5(4) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 400.6(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-norm

12 At the end of subsection 400.6(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-12-norm

act-sch-5-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 At the end of subsection 400.6(4) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 400.7(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
note: Omit “Note”, substitute ‘Note 1’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-13-norm

14 At the end of subsection 400.7(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
note: Prohibition on money laundering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to prevent money laundering
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-112
note: Dealing with money or property intended to become an instrument of crime is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-5-sec-112-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 112 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap with prohibited activities
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Influence on prohibited activities
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analysis of prohibited activities
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-112-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validation of prohibited activities
premise text: (a) is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime; or (b) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 At the end of section 400.8 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
note: Section 400.2A affects the application of this section so far as it relates to a person dealing with money or other property that is intended by the person to become an instrument of crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-15-norm

act-sch-5-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 At the end of section 400.8 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-16
has part: 16(1) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
has part: 16(1A) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118

16(1) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
note: Dealing with proceeds of crime over $100,000 is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies imprisonment for 3 years or penalty units
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of dealing with proceeds of crime
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Holds for all temporal intervals of dealing with proceeds of crime
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
logic summary: Diffuses into a set of agents with authority to investigate
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes a pattern in data related to proceeds of crime
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) it is reasonable to suspect that the money or property is proceeds of crime; and (c) at the time of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(1A) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a
part of: 16 Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
note: Dealing with proceeds of crime is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1A) Subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Dealing with proceeds of crime implies an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 400.9(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-17
note: Insertion of new provision after subsection (1)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Subsection 400.9(2) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a new provision
premise text: (1)(b)
conclusion text: (1A)(b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

18 Paragraph 400.9(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-18
note: Insertion of a phrase after 'expenditure'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-18-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Paragraph 400.9(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 400.9(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-19
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-19-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 400.9(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-20
note: Omit specific paragraph references in Criminal Code subsection 400.9(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-20-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific paragraph references
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 400.9(6) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-21
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-21-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-22
note: Omit “or 400.7”, substitute ‘, 400.7 or 400.9’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-22-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove the specified clause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Section 400.15 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-23
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-23-norm

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-400-4
note: Geographical jurisdiction for committing an offence against this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400 Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly or partly
logic summary: Part of the conduct must occur in Australia
premise text: The conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly or partly in Australia
conclusion text: A person does not commit an offence against this Division unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly or partly
logic summary: Part of the conduct must occur on board an Australian aircraft or ship
premise text: (i) wholly or partly in Australia; (ii) wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or an Australian ship
conclusion text: ...the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly or partly in Australia; or wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or an Australian ship;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly outside
logic summary: Conduct must occur outside Australia
premise text: (b) the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...
conclusion text: ...the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: related to a Commonwealth indictable offence
logic summary: Conduct must be related to a specific type of offence
premise text: (iii) is at risk of becoming an instrument of crime; in relation to a Commonwealth indictable offence, a State indictable offence, an Australian Capital Territory indictable offence or a Northern Territory indictable offence;
conclusion text: ...in relation to a Commonwealth indictable offence, a State indictable offence, an Australian Capital Territory indictable offence or a Northern Territory indictable offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-400-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: wholly outside
logic summary: Conduct must occur outside Australia and meet specific conditions
premise text: (c) the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...
conclusion text: ...the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly outside Australia...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-114
note: Residency requirement for alleged offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.120
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-5-sec-114-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires residency
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or
conclusion text: (No. 2) 2010 (ii) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is a resident of Australia; or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-114-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Residency requirement applies during alleged offence
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 (i) at the time of the alleged offence, the person is an Australian citizen; or
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2
has part: 11(2) Section 11
has part: 11(3) Section 11
has part: 11(4) Section 11
has part: 11(5) Section 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.120

11(2) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Exemption from prosecution for conduct occurring in a foreign country
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.120
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(2) Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exempts from prosecution
premise text: (2) A person is not guilty of an offence against this Division...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relates to conduct occurring in a foreign country
premise text: (b) the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs wholly in...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(3) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Exception provision for subsection (2) of section 11(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.120
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the law creating the offence
premise text: (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.
conclusion text: The law creating the offence must acknowledge this exception.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits the law creating the offence to acknowledge exceptions
premise text: (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.
conclusion text: The law creating the offence may acknowledge (2) as an exception.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the law to acknowledge exceptions
premise text: (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.
conclusion text: The law creating the offence must acknowledge (2) as an exception.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the offender to comply with exceptions
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the application of subsection 13.3(3) to an offence, (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.
conclusion text: The offender must comply with exceptions acknowledged by the law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the court to apply exceptions
premise text: (3) For the purposes of the application of subsection 13.3(3) to an offence, (2) of this section is taken to be an exception provided by the law creating the offence.
conclusion text: The court must apply exceptions acknowledged by the law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(4) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4
part of: 11 Section 11
note: A person is not guilty of an offence against this Division if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.120
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on individuals and bodies corporate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: The provision specifies the temporal scope of the exemption.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The provision implies that certain conditions must be met for an individual to be exempt from liability.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: The provision propagates the exemption to individuals and bodies corporate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: The provision represents knowledge about exemptions from liability.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(5) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Exception provision for subsection (4) of section 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.120
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: taken to be
logic summary: Taken to be an exception
premise text: (4) of this section
conclusion text: exception provided by the law creating the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-116
has part: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122

116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-116-ss-6
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Section 16.1 applies in relation to an offence against this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-6-norm

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-116-ss-7
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application to Division and Part
premise text: Division and Part have the same applicability
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between Division and Part
premise text: Division and Part have the same temporal applicability
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between Division and Part
premise text: Division and Part have the same recurring applicability
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-116-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application to Conduct
premise text: Conduct is subject to applicability
conclusion text: Sections 16.2 and 16.3 apply for the purposes of this Division in the same way as they apply for the purposes of Part 2.7.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-24
note: Amendments apply in relation to conduct engaged on or after commencement of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-24-norm

25 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-25
note: Definition of non-financier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.123
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-5-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Section 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: non-financier means a person who is not...
conclusion text: a non-financier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-25-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: non-financier means a person who is not...
conclusion text: a non-financier
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Section 5 (definition of stored value card)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-26
note: Defines stored value card, excluding debit and credit cards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.123
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-26-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-5-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Section 5 (definition of stored value card)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes definition of stored value card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes new definition for stored value card
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 6(2) (table items 21, 22, 23 and 24)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-27
note: Replace 'stored on' with 'stored in connection with'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.123
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-27-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: replacement
logic summary: Replacement of words
premise text: Replace 'stored on' with 'stored in connection with'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 6(2) (table items 31 and 32)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-28
note: Repeal items, substitute with Schedule 5 Money laundering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.123
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-28-norm

118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-118
note: Prohibition on carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-118-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition
premise text: (No. 2) 2010 in the capacity of a non-financier carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements,
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-29
note: Application of amendments to designated services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-29-norm

30 Paragraphs 10(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-30
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with a new definition of non-financier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-30-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the transfer of money or property under a remittance arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Transitional provisions for AML/CTF Rules
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
note: Transitional provisions for AML/CTF Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-31-norm

32 Paragraph 10(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-32
note: Omit certain wording from an arrangement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-32-norm

33 Section 46 (table items 3 and 4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-33
note: Omit 'person in Australia', substitute 'non-financier in Australia'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-33-norm

34 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-34
note: Omit 'as soon as possible', substitute 'immediately'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-34-norm

35 Subsection 123(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-35
note: Reporting entities must not disclose certain information to anyone else.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-35-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-5-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Reporting entity required to give information
conclusion text: Cannot disclose certain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-120
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-120-norm

36 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-36
note: Applicability of subsection 123(3) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-norm
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-5-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicability of a provision
premise text: The provision applies to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: The provision is applicable in relation to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for applicability
premise text: The provision applies to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act before, on or after the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for applicability is before, on or after the commencement of this item.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for applicability
premise text: The provision applies to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act before, on or after the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for applicability is before, on or after the commencement of this item.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply the provision
premise text: The provision applies in relation to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to apply the provision in relation to requirements made under subsection 49(1) of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 At the end of Division 6 of Part IB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-1-norm

20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi
has part: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127

20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Right to appeal against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Court of Appeal gives leave to appeal on certain grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) The accused may appeal...
conclusion text: The Court of Appeal gives leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between grounds for appeal
premise text: (2) The accused may appeal...
conclusion text: Grounds for appeal: before the trial, on appeal
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Court of Appeal must allow appeal if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court has a duty to allow appeal.
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must...
conclusion text: ...the appeal if the court thinks...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Appeal is related to a specific time period.
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal if...
conclusion text: ...the appeal if the court thinks that...(a)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Appeal implies a miscarriage of justice.
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal...
conclusion text: ...there was a miscarriage of justice.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Appeal is related to a specific type of decision.
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal...
conclusion text: ...the order of the Supreme Court or County Court giving effect...to the finding should be set aside...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Appeal is related to a specific type of decision.
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow the appeal...
conclusion text: ...the order of the Supreme Court or County Court giving effect...to the finding should be set aside...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-122
has part: 122(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 122(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128

122(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-4
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court of Appeal must dismiss appeal under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss appeal
premise text: (4) Otherwise, the Court of Appeal must dismiss the appeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-5
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court of Appeal may dismiss appeal if no substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-6
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court of Appeal may make orders for custody or bail of the accused if appeal is allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court of Appeal prohibits custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recur
logic summary: Court of Appeal recurs to custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court of Appeal permits custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Court of Appeal overlaps with custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Court of Appeal diffuses information about custody or bail if appeal is allowed.
premise text: If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-7
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Rules of court may make provision relating to appeals and proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-122-ss-8
part of: 122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Division has effect subject to this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-122-ss-8-norm

2 Application of section 20BI of the Crimes Act 1914
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
note: Applicability of section 20BI of the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: Commencement of section 20BI
conclusion text: Applicability to findings
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Transitional provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
note: Appeal proceedings for unfitness to plead continue to apply despite repeal of section 570C.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-6-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Transitional provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
premise text: Section 68 of the Judiciary Act 1903
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Peremption
logic summary: Repeal does not affect provisions that were in force immediately before repeal.
premise text: Paragraph (2) of the provision
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Relevant provisions overlap with section 570C.
premise text: Section 570A as applied by section 570C
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Repeal does not affect provisions that were in force immediately before repeal.
premise text: Paragraph (2) of the provision
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply despite repeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-124
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act, 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-6-sec-124-norm

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
note: Definition of constable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-norm

act-sch-7-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of eligible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
note: Add Commissioner of Taxation to eligible Commonwealth Board members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of eligible
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding entities to a set
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
note: Definition of contempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
conclusion text: contempt of the ACC has the meaning given by section 34A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of intelligence operation)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
note: Definition of intelligence operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-4-norm

act-sch-7-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of intelligence operation)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
note: Definition of Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-7-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: Ombudsman means the Commonwealth Ombudsman.
conclusion text: Ombudsman is defined as the Commonwealth Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 4A(6) (definition of intelligence operation)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
note: Definition of intelligence operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-6-norm

act-sch-7-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 4A(6) (definition of intelligence operation)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 At the end of subsection 7B(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
note: Add the Commissioner of Taxation to the list.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 At the end of subsection 7B(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding a new entity to a list is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 7C(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
note: Omit '3 days', substitute '7 days'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-8-norm

9 Paragraph 28(1A)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
note: Omit specific phrase from summons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
premise text: Omitting phrase is prohibited.
conclusion text: Phrase cannot be omitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Paragraph 28(1A)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 28(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
note: Failure to comply with section 29A does not affect the validity of a summons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Subsection 28(8)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: A
conclusion text: B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraph 29(1A)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of specific words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Paragraph 29(1A)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-13-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 29(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14
note: Repeal subsection and substitute with new schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-14-norm

126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-126
note: Failure to comply with section 29A does not affect notice validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-126-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-126-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation implies obligation
premise text: Section 29A has an obligation on the agent
conclusion text: Failure to comply does not affect notice validity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 At the end of subsection 29B(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-15
note: Addition of complaint purposes for Ombudsman and Australian Law Enforcement Integrity Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 At the end of subsection 29B(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding purposes for complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Paragraph 29B(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16
note: Omit 'giving legal advice', substitute 'giving or obtaining legal advice or legal representation'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-16-norm

17 At the end of subsection 29B(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-17
note: Addition of complaint purposes for Ombudsman and Australian Law Enforcement Integrity Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 At the end of subsection 29B(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding to existing provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 After section 34
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-18
note: Insert clause after section 34
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-18-norm

34A Contempt of the ACC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34a
note: Refusing or failing to comply with examiner requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34a-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34A Contempt of the ACC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits refusing or failing to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b
has part: 34B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 34B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 34B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133

34B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1
part of: 34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Examiner may apply to courts for contempt dealing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) If an examiner is of the opinion that, during an examination before the examiner, a person is in contempt of the ACC, the examiner may apply to either of the following courts for the person to be dealt with in relation to the contempt:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2
part of: 34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Examiner must inform person before making application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3
part of: 34B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Application must be accompanied by a certificate stating grounds for making the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-128
has part: 128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 128(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 128(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134

128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-128-ss-4
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Must provide a copy of the certificate before or at the same time as an application is made.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the certificate before or at the same time as an application is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-128-ss-5
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may deal with person as if acts or omissions constituted contempt of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-128-ss-6
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to contempt of the ACC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-128-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 applies to contempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34C Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c
has part: 34C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 34C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 34C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134

34C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1
part of: 34C Conduct of contempt proceedings
note: Application for contempt proceeding must be made to the Federal Court or Supreme Court of a State or Territory under section 34B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2
part of: 34C Conduct of contempt proceedings
note: Proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the laws that apply to punishment of contempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace for proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference for proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the Court to which the application was made.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3
part of: 34C Conduct of contempt proceedings
note: Certificate under subsection 34B(3) is prima facie evidence of matters specified in the certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to provide evidence.
premise text: The certificate is issued by the State.
conclusion text: The certificate is prima facie evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34D Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d
has part: 34D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 34D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135

34D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Person in contempt may be detained
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Detention obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Person must be brought before the Court as soon as practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must bring person before the Court.
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):
conclusion text: the person must, subject to subsection (3) of this section, be brought before the Court as soon as practicable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1).
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):
conclusion text: the examiner must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1) in respect of the person;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Person detention is contained within subsection (1).
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):
conclusion text: the examiner must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1) in respect of the person;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Detention implies bringing person before the Court.
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):
conclusion text: the person must, subject to subsection (3) of this section, be brought before the Court as soon as practicable.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
logic summary: Detention spreads to bringing person before the Court.
premise text: (2) If the person is detained under subsection (1):
conclusion text: the examiner must apply to the Court as soon as practicable under subsection 34B(1) in respect of the person;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

34D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Person in contempt may be detained
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to appear before the Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Conditions for release from detention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Court imposes conditions on release
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5
part of: 34D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Court may vary or revoke a condition imposed under subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may vary or revoke a condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34E Examiner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34e
has part: 34E(1) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
has part: 34E(2) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135

34E(1) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1
part of: 34E Examiner may withdraw contempt application
note: Examiner may withdraw contempt application at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34E(1) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permissive obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34E(2) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2
part of: 34E Examiner may withdraw contempt application
note: Person must be released from detention immediately if examiner withdraws contempt application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.135
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34E(2) Examiner may withdraw contempt application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: (2) If the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between examiner's action and person's release
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;
conclusion text: the temporal interval between the examiner's action and the person's release is a mandatory obligation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of person's release
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;
conclusion text: the recurring trace of the person's release is a mandatory obligation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to release person from detention
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;
conclusion text: the diffusion of the obligation to release the person from detention is a mandatory obligation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-34e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of provision as an obligation using CogAI
premise text: (2) If: (a) the examiner does so; and (b) the person is in detention under section 34D;
conclusion text: the provision classifies the person's detention as an obligation using CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-130
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-130-norm

34F Relationship with section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34f
note: No evidence required for subsection 12(1) applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-34f-norm

19 At the end of subsection 35(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19
note: Prohibit threatening a person present at an examination before an examiner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-19-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-19-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 At the end of subsection 35(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Section 35A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-20
note: Insert '(1)' before 'Where'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-20-norm

21 At the end of section 35A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21
has part: 21(2) At the end of section 35A
has part: 21(3) At the end of section 35A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136

21(2) At the end of section 35A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 At the end of section 35A
note: No prosecution for an offence in respect of an act or omission if dealt with by the Court under subsection 34B(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) At the end of section 35A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court, then no prosecution.
premise text: (2) If an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a temporal interval where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a trace where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a diffusion where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with a cognitive AI where an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person.
premise text: (2) If: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission by a person; and (b) the person is dealt with by the Court under that section in respect of the act or omission;
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

21(3) At the end of section 35A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21-ss-3
part of: 21 At the end of section 35A
note: No application can be made under subsection 34B(1) in respect of an act or omission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(3) At the end of section 35A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No application can be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Section 61A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-22
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-22-norm

61A Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a
has part: 61A(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 61A(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 61A(3) Review of operation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136

61A(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1
part of: 61A Review of operation of Act
note: Independent review of operation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to undertake review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2
part of: 61A Review of operation of Act
note: Review of operation of Act must be undertaken after a 5 year period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3
part of: 61A Review of operation of Act
note: Minister's review of Act operation is overridden by parliamentary committee review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Override
logic summary: Parliamentary committee takes precedence over Minister's review.
premise text: Committee review initiated before Minister undertakes review.
conclusion text: Minister's review is overridden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Excerpt describes an overlap between the Minister's review and parliamentary committee review.
premise text: Both reviews occur within the same time period.
conclusion text: Reviews overlap in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Excerpt implies that a parliamentary committee can infer the Minister's review is overridden.
premise text: Committee review is initiated before Minister undertakes review.
conclusion text: Minister's review is overridden by committee review.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Excerpt validates the parliamentary committee's right to initiate a review.
premise text: Committee review is initiated before Minister undertakes review.
conclusion text: Review is validly initiated by committee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Excerpt implies that the Minister's review is overridden if a parliamentary committee initiates a review.
premise text: Committee review is initiated before Minister undertakes review.
conclusion text: Minister's review is implied to be overridden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-132
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-132-norm

23 After paragraph (w) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-23
note: Permits decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-cogai-3
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-shacl-4
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-n3logic-5

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Grants permission for decisions under specified sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Establishes a relation between decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Identifies decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004 as relevant
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: Ensures decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004 conform to specified rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-23-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Categorizes decisions under section 34B or 34D of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 and Surveillance Devices Act 2004 as valid
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-24
note: Add a proceeding in relation to an application under subsection 34B(1) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 in respect of contempt of the Australian Crime Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-24-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Add
logic summary: Adds a proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 After paragraph 5B(1)(hc)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-25
note: Inserts a proceeding for contempt of the Australian Crime Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Inserts a new provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Application of amendments relating to contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-26
note: Application of amendments relating to contempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.139
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-26-norm

27 Application of amendment made by item 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-27
note: Amendment applies to operations before, on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.139
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-27-norm

28 Application of amendments relating to reasons for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-28
note: Amendments apply to summons or notice issued on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.139
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-28-norm

29 Application of amendments made by items 24 and 25
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-29
note: Amendments apply to information obtained before, on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.139
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-29-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-7-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Application of amendments made by items 24 and 25
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-7-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-134
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-134-norm

1 Subsection 70.2(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-1
note: Repeal a penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-1-norm

2 Subsection 70.2(1) of the Criminal Code (notes 1 and 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2
note: Repeal notes and substitute with new note.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-8-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identify temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval present
conclusion text: Interval classification applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3
has part: 3(4) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(5) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(6) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(7) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 3(8) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140

3(4) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-4
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
note: Offence punishable by imprisonment, fine or both
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits punishment
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: punishable on conviction by imprisonment for not more than 10 years, a fine not more than 10,000 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for punishment
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for punishment
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses punishment to individuals
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classifies punishment as imprisonment, fine or both
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(5) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-5
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
note: Body corporate punishable by fine not exceeding certain amounts for offence committed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits body corporate from committing certain conduct
premise text: (5) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between conduct and fines
premise text: (5) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes implication between conduct and fines
premise text: (5) An offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates fines to related bodies corporate
premise text: (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained...
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classifies fines based on benefit obtained
premise text: (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained...
conclusion text: ...3 times the value of that benefit;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

3(6) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-6
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
note: Excludes certain supplies from annual turnover calculation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Excludes certain supplies from annual turnover calculation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(7) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-7
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
note: Meaning of expressions from A New Tax System Act 1999 applied to subsection (6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: same meaning
logic summary: Same meaning as in A New Tax System Act 1999
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(8) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3-ss-8
part of: 3 At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
note: Determine relatedness for purposes of this section and Corporations Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(8) At the end of section 70.2 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines relatedness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 141.1(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-4
note: Repeal the penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 141.1(3) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-5
note: Repeal a penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-8-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 At the end of section 141.1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-6
has part: 6(5) At the end of section 141.1
has part: 6(6) At the end of section 141.1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141

6(5) At the end of section 141.1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-6-ss-5
part of: 6 At the end of section 141.1
note: Offence punishable by imprisonment, fine or both
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits punishment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(6) At the end of section 141.1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-6-ss-6
part of: 6 At the end of section 141.1
note: Offence against subsections (1) or (3) by a body corporate is punishable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits offence against subsections (1) or (3)
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate
conclusion text: is punishable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal interval defined in Schedule 8
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurringTrace
logic summary: Recurring trace with temporal interval defined in Schedule 8
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation to punish offence against subsections (1) or (3)
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits punishment for failure to punish offence against subsections (1) or (3)
premise text: (6) An offence against subsection (1) or (3) committed by a body corporate
conclusion text: is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-136
has part: 136(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 136(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 136(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.142

136(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-136-ss-7
part of: 136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Annual turnover calculation for corporate bodies
description: Annual turnover value
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.142
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Annual turnover calculation for corporate bodies
conclusion text: Annual turnover value
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for calculating annual turnover
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-136-ss-8
part of: 136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Same meaning as in A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.142
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same meaning as in A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-136-ss-9
part of: 136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Determine related bodies corporate in the same way as for the Corporations Act 2001.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.142
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-8-sec-136-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 300.2 of the Criminal Code (definition of import)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-1
note: Repeal definition of import, substitute with new definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.143
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-9-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 300.2 of the Criminal Code (definition of import)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-9-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Definition substitution
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-138
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-9-sec-138-norm

1 Subparagraph 199(9)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-1
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-1-norm

2 Subparagraph 75(c)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-2
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-2-norm

3 Paragraph 188(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-3
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
premise text: Text to be inserted
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: insertion
logic summary: Temporal insertion of text
premise text: Temporal interval with start at '11.2' and end at '11.2A'
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: insertion
logic summary: Temporal insertion of text with LTL
premise text: Temporal interval with start at '11.2' and end at '11.2A'
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in temporal interval with LTL
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: insertion
logic summary: Diffusion of text through definition hierarchy
premise text: Definition hierarchy with '11.2' and '11.2A'
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in definition hierarchy through diffusion
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-10-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: insertion
logic summary: CogAI insertion of text
premise text: Definition hierarchy with '11.2' and '11.2A'
conclusion text: Text 'or 11.2A' inserted after '11.2' in definition hierarchy through CogAI
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subparagraph 47(9)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-4
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-4-norm

5 Paragraph 496-20(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-5
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Paragraph 496-20(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-10-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a new section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Paragraph 1042F(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-6
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-6-norm

7 Paragraph 50AA(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-7
note: Omit specific clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause
premise text: Clause omitted
conclusion text: Clause not present
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 50AA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-8
note: Insertion of new subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a new element
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 10(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-9
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-9-norm

act-sch-10-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Subsection 10(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 8(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-10
note: Omit or substitute specific clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 5A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-11
note: Omit specific clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 18(5) (definition of offence against this
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-12
note: Substitute specific offence definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-12-norm

13 Subsection 20(6) (definition of offence against Division 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-13
note: Omit 'or 11.2', substitute '11.2 or 11.2A'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-13-norm

14 Subsection 29(5) (definition of offence against this Part)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-14
note: Substitute clause in definition of offence against this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Paragraph 30(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-15
note: Substitute clause in Schedule 10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace clause with new one
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-140
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-140-norm

16 Paragraph 31(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-16
note: Omit 'or 11.2', substitute ', 11.2 or 11.2A'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-16-norm

17 Paragraph 16AA(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-17
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 54A(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-18
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-18-norm

19 Paragraph 87AA(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-19
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-19-norm

20 After subsection 61B(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-20
note: A person convicted of an offence against this Act is taken to have been convicted of an ancillary offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-20-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 After subsection 61B(8)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-10-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-21
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-21-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Paragraph 225(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-22
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.147
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-22-norm

23 Subsection 99A(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-23
note: Insertion of new subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.147
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-23-norm

24 Section 338 (paragraph (g) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-24
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.147
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-24-norm

25 Subparagraph 56(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-25
note: Omit 'or 11.2', substitute ', 11.2 or 11.2A'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.147
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-25-norm

26 Subsection 62(14)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-26
note: Insertion of new subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.147
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-26-norm

27 Paragraph 1224AB(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-27
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.147
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-27-norm

28 Paragraph 228(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-28
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.147
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-28-norm

142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-142
note: Reference to another Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-142-norm

29 Subsection 66(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-29
note: Insertion of new subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 150(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-30
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-30-norm
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-10-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Subsection 9(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-31
note: Insertion of new subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-10-sec-31-norm

1 Subsection 16(7) (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-1-4
note: Repeal of paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of offence against this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of repeal of paragraphs (a) and (b)
premise text: Repeal
conclusion text: Paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of offence against this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between repeal and substitution
premise text: Repeal paragraphs (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between repeal and substitution
premise text: Repeal paragraphs (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of substitution to related sections
premise text: Substitution of sections 6 and 11.1-11.5
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-1-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph update
logic summary: Update knowledge graph with substitution
premise text: Substitution of sections 6 and 11.1-11.5
conclusion text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or section 11.1, 11.4 or 11.5 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 225(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2-4
note: Omit specific references from the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific references.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 3(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-3-3
note: Omit certain references in the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain references
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-2
note: Reference to section 4 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: reference
logic summary: Referential obligation
premise text: Section 4 of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: Obligation to comply with section 4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections of the Criminal Code
premise text: Section 11 is before section 4 in the Criminal Code
conclusion text: Temporal relation between sections 11 and 4
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
logic summary: Inferential relationship between sections of the Criminal Code
premise text: Section 11 is part of the Criminal Code, which includes section 4
conclusion text: Inferential relationship between sections 11 and 4
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: information flow
logic summary: Information flow from section 4 to section 11 in the Criminal Code
premise text: Section 4 of the Criminal Code refers to section 11
conclusion text: Information flow from section 4 to section 11
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-11-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for sections of the Criminal Code
premise text: Section 11 is a part of the Criminal Code, which can be represented as knowledge
conclusion text: Knowledge representation for section 11
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 3(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-4
note: Omit specified references to repealed provisions of the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-4-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified references.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-144
note: Amendment of Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-144-norm

act-sch-11-sec-144-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 15B(1B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-5-2
note: Omit specific phrase from section 5(1B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-5-2-norm

6 Section 51 (definition of offence against this Part)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-6-2
note: Defines what constitutes an offence against this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-6-2-norm

act-sch-11-sec-6-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Section 51 (definition of offence against this Part)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Paragraph 108(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-7-2
note: Omit specified sections or subsections from the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified sections or subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-3
note: Reference to section of Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-3-norm

8 Subsection 4(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-8-2
note: Omit certain references in the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain references
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-4
note: Reference to Criminal Code section 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to
logic summary: References a provision
premise text: The Criminal Code contains section 4.
conclusion text: This section refers to section 4 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 16(2) (paragraph (d) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-9-2
note: Repeal of paragraph (d) and substitution with new definition of offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-9-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-9-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-9-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the repealed paragraph
premise text: Repeal of paragraph (d)
conclusion text: New definition of offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Paragraph 78(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-10-2
note: Repeal paragraph 78(1)(d) and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 189(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-5
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with reference to section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of reference to ancillary offence
premise text: Reference to ancillary offence
conclusion text: Prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-146
note: Prohibition on committing certain crimes under this Act or the regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-146-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-146-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits committing certain crimes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 23DA(1) (subparagraphs (c)(i) and (ii) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-12-2
note: Repeal of subparagraphs and substitution with other sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-12-2-norm

13 Paragraphs 378(7)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-13-2
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-13-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-13-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraphs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Paragraph 65(9)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-14
note: Repeal of certain provisions and substitution with new references.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-14-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specific offenses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 76(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-15
note: Repeal subsection, substitute reference to certain offences against other sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.153
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-15-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-11-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Subsection 76(9)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a subclass of offences under section 74 or 75.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 3(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-16
note: Omit certain references in the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.153
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-16-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain references
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-6
note: Reference to Criminal Code section 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.153
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-11-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: reference
logic summary: Referential obligation
premise text: Criminal Code section 4
conclusion text: Obligation to comply with Criminal Code section 4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 4(1) (definition of offence against this Act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-17
note: Defines an offence against this Act, including offences from the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.153
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-17-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-11-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Subsection 4(1) (definition of offence against this Act)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines a set of offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Replaces the definition with a new one
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-148
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-148-norm

18 Paragraphs 32(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-18
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new offences against sections 6 and 11.1-11.5 of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-18-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on paragraphs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Paragraphs 33(5)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-5
note: Repeal certain paragraphs and substitute with new offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraphs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 8J(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-9
note: Replace reference to offence against subsection 8K(1) or (1B) or 8L(1) or (1A) with reference to section 11.1 of the Criminal Code that relates to an offence against subsection 8K(1) or (1B) or 8L(1) or (1A).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-9-norm

21 Subsection 8J(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-21
note: Omit section 7 of the Crimes Act 1914, substitute section 11.1 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-21-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on section 7 of the Crimes Act 1914
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 32(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-22
note: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-cogai-6

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code.
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8)
conclusion text: Substitute with a new provision that includes references to these offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code as relevant to this Act.
premise text: References to an offence against this Act include a reference to an offence:
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 and sections 11.2, 11.4, and 11.5 of the Criminal Code.
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to an offence:
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring reference to an offence against this Act includes a reference to an offence:
premise text: References to an offence against this Act include a reference to an offence:
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads reference to an offence against this Act to include references to certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code.
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to an offence:
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-11-sec-22-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the relevance of certain offences against the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code to this Act.
premise text: Repeal subsection 32(8) and substitute with a new provision that includes references to an offence:
conclusion text: against section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 or that is taken to have been committed because of section 11.2 or 11.2A of the Criminal Code
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Subsection 79(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-23
note: Omit certain sections of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.155
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-23-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified sections of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Section 4 (definition of offence against this Act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-24
note: Definition of offence against this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.155
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-24-norm

act-sch-11-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Section 4 (definition of offence against this Act)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-11-7
note: Reference to section of Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.155
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-11-7-norm

act-sch-11-sec-11-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

25 Section 3 (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-25
note: Repeal paragraphs, substitute with sections from other Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.155
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-25-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing paragraphs with new ones
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-19-6
note: See s. 2(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.157
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-19-6-norm

22 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-22-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.157
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-22-2-norm

152 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-152
note: Commencement information for provisions of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-152-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4-5
note: Commencement of item 182 of Schedule 1 to the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act (No. 2) 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-4-5-norm

20 February 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-20-10
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act (No. 2) 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-11-sec-20-10-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-11-sec-20-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: amend
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to amend the provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed