1 After paragraph 5(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Deprive persons of unexplained wealth amounts not derived from certain offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to deprive unexplained wealth
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 After paragraph 5(b)

10 At the end of subsection 39(1) (after the note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Court may order Official Trustee to pay unexplained wealth amount out of property covered by restraining order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Court must make order without notice if DPP requests.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make order without notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

11 At the end of section 45
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Section 45 does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A during its effective period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A during its effective period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: The effective period of this section starts at the beginning.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A until the end of this section's effective period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A from being applied until the end of this section's effective period.
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: The effective period of this section ends at the end.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: This section applies to all restraining orders.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A during its effective period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A from being applied during its effective period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: The effective period of this section starts at the beginning.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A until the end of this section's effective period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A until the end of this section's effective period.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: The effective period of this section ends at the end.

12 At the end of Division 6 of Part 2-1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 12(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 12(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 12(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Burden of proof for wealth not derived from offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Burden of proof
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

12(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Court may consider information not included in application when making an order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May consider additional information
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: subsection (1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

12(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Section 317 has effect despite subsection (3) of section 12(5)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 317
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 317 has effect despite subsection (3) of section 12(5)
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Subsection (3)

12(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Court may refuse to make order if not in public interest.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order refused
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court refusal
modality: Deontic
operator: refusal
premise text: Not in public interest

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

13 At the end of Chapter 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Add at the end of Chapter 2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 After paragraph 202(5)(e)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Insert Schedule 1 Unexplained wealth
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Schedule 1 Unexplained wealth inserted
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of new provision
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT
premise text: New provision inserted

15 Paragraph 202(5)(f)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Omit specific phrase from text
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: An order under this section may relate to more than one of the person's dependants.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 After section 282
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relates to dependants
modality: Deontic
operator: relates_to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

17 Subsections 283(1) and 284(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Inserts 'or 282A' after '282'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

179A Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Requires a person to attend court for the purpose of deciding whether to make an unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires a person to attend court.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179A Simplified outline of this Part

179B Making an order requiring a person to appear
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179B(1) Making an order requiring a person to appear
has part: 179B(2) Making an order requiring a person to appear
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179b
schema version: 2

179B(1) Making an order requiring a person to appear
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Order to appear before court for investigation of unexplained wealth
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179B Making an order requiring a person to appear

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Appearance required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation to appear
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179B(1) Making an order requiring a person to appear

179B(2) Making an order requiring a person to appear
type: Concept
description: Affidavit from authorised officer
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Application for unexplained wealth order must be supported by affidavit stating identity and suspicions of excessive wealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179B Making an order requiring a person to appear

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Affidavit must be provided
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179B(2) Making an order requiring a person to appear

179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179C(1) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
has part: 179C(2) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
has part: 179C(4) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
has part: 179C(5) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c
schema version: 2

179C(1) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Person may apply to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order

179C(2) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Application for revocation of preliminary unexplained wealth order must be made within 28 days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is mandatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179C(2) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order

179C(4) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Remains in force until court revokes order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order

179C(5) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Court may revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order on application under subsection (1) if satisfied that there are no grounds, it is in the public interest, or it is otherwise in the interests of justice.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on application under subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court may revoke...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to revoke the order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order in public interest
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: it is in the public interest to do so

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to revoke the order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order for other reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: it is otherwise in the interests of justice to do so

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179C(5) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order

179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179CA(1) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(2) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(3) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(4) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(5) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(6) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca
schema version: 2

179CA(1) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179CA(1) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

179CA(2) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Applicant may appear and adduce material at the hearing of the application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicant has a right to appear and adduce material.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179CA(2) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

179CA(3) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
description: written notice of the application; a copy of any affidavit supporting the application
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application must be made within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice and affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

179CA(4) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: DPP may appear and adduce additional material at the hearing of the application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to appear and adduce material
modality: Deontic
operator: may

179CA(5) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Must provide affidavit to applicant
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

179CA(6) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Notice and copies of affidavits must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The timeframe for providing notice and copies of affidavats is between now and the hearing date
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing notice and copies of affidavats
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavats must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must provide notice and copies of affidavits within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice and copies of affidavits
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavits must be given under subsections (3) and (5)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must provide notice and copies of affidavats within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice and copies of affidavats within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavats must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The timeframe for providing notice and copies of affidavats is between now and the hearing date
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing notice and copies of affidavats
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavats must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179CA(6) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary

179D Notice of revocation of a preliminary unexplained wealth
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: Written notice of revocation to applicant
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179d
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The DPP must give written notice of the revocation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

179E Making an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179E(1) Making an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179E(2) Making an unexplained wealth order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179e
schema version: 2

179E(1) Making an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: Court may order person to pay amount to Commonwealth if wealth not derived from certain offenses.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179E Making an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the court has made a *preliminary unexplained wealth order in relation to the person; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Wealth derived from certain offenses is between the time of offense and payment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (a) the court has made a *preliminary unexplained wealth order in relation to the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the court has made a *preliminary unexplained wealth order in relation to the person; and (b) the court is not satisfied that the whole or any part of the person’s *wealth was not derived from one or more of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has obligation to order payment if wealth not derived from certain offenses.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) A court with *proceeds jurisdiction may make an order (an unexplained wealth order) requiring a person to pay an amount to the Commonwealth...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (b) the court is not satisfied that the whole or any part of the person’s *wealth was not derived from one or more of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Court's obligation ends when payment is made.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (b) the court is not satisfied that the whole or any part of the person’s *wealth was not derived from one or more of the following:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179E(1) Making an unexplained wealth order

179E(2) Making an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
description: Amount of unexplained wealth
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: Court must specify the amount of unexplained wealth to be paid to the Commonwealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179E Making an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for unexplained wealth calculation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The court must specify in the order that the person is liable to pay...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must specify in the order that the person is liable to pay...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must specify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179E(2) Making an unexplained wealth order

179EA Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179EA(1) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
has part: 179EA(2) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ea
schema version: 2

179EA(1) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Refusal to make order without undertaking on damages/costs
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179EA Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order not made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Refusal to make order
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
premise text: Court may refuse

179EA(2) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: The DPP may give an undertaking on behalf of the Commonwealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179EA Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

179EB Costs
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Court may make order for costs on an indemnity basis if preliminary or unexplained wealth orders are refused.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179eb
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179EB Costs

179F Ancillary orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179F(1) Ancillary orders
has part: 179F(2) Ancillary orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179f
schema version: 2

179F(1) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Court may make ancillary orders to an unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179F Ancillary orders

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179F(1) Ancillary orders

179F(2) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Court may make ancillary orders to a preliminary unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179F Ancillary orders

179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179G(1) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
has part: 179G(2) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
has part: 179G(3) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
has part: 179G(4) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g
schema version: 2

179G(1) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Defines total wealth for the purposes of this Part
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179G(1) Determining unexplained wealth amounts

179G(2) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Defines total wealth as the sum of property values
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179G(2) Determining unexplained wealth amounts

179G(3) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Determine the value of disposed property
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to determine property value
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179G(3) Determining unexplained wealth amounts

179G(4) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Determine the value of unexplained property amounts
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to determine property values
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179G(4) Determining unexplained wealth amounts

179H Effect of property vesting in an insolvency trustee
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Property vests in trustee upon insolvency
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179h
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property vests in trustee upon insolvency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Property continues to be the person's property
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179H Effect of property vesting in an insolvency trustee

179J Reducing unexplained wealth amounts to take account of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Deduct unexplained wealth amounts from a person's total wealth when determining an unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179j
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires deducting unexplained wealth amounts at a specific time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal deduction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to deduct unexplained wealth amounts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Deduction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179J Reducing unexplained wealth amounts to take account of

179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179K(1) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
has part: 179K(2) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
has part: 179K(3) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
has part: 179K(4) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k
schema version: 2

179K(1) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Court may vary unexplained wealth order to increase amount.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179K(1) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts

179K(2) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Increase unexplained wealth amount under certain conditions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Increase unexplained wealth amount
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May increase unexplained wealth amount
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Value of property deducted from unexplained wealth

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179K(2) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts

179K(3) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Increase unexplained wealth amount under certain conditions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unexplained wealth amount may be increased
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: an appeal against the amount payable, or against the order, is allowed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179K(3) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts

179K(4) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: The DPP's application may deal with more than one increase to the same unexplained wealth amount.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May deal with more than one increase
modality: Deontic
operator: may

179L Relieving certain dependants from hardship
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.19
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179L(1) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
has part: 179L(2) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179l
schema version: 2

179L(1) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: The court must pay a specified amount to a dependent if the unexplained wealth order would cause hardship and the amount relieves that hardship.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179L Relieving certain dependants from hardship

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court must pay a specified amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179L(1) Relieving certain dependants from hardship

179L(2) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Must not exceed the person's unexplained wealth amount.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179L Relieving certain dependants from hardship

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
modality: CogAI
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding the person's unexplained wealth amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
modality: LTL
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179L(2) Relieving certain dependants from hardship

179M DPP may apply for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: DPP may apply for an unexplained wealth order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179m-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179m
schema version: 2

179N Notice of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179N(1) Notice of application
has part: 179N(2) Notice of application
has part: 179N(3) Notice of application
has part: 179N(4) Notice of application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n
schema version: 2

179N(1) Notice of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Notice requirements for unexplained wealth order application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179N Notice of application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

179N(2) Notice of application
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Provide written notice and a copy of the application to the person subject to the unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179N Notice of application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice and application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

179N(3) Notice of application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Must provide a copy of supporting affidavit to the person subject to the unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179N Notice of application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

179N(4) Notice of application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Provide copies of notice under subsection (3) within a reasonable time before the hearing.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 179N Notice of application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide copies of notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179N(4) Notice of application

179P Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179P(1) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179P(2) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179p
schema version: 2

179P(1) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Cannot apply for unexplained wealth order against a person with previous application determined on the merits.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179P Additional application for an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of applying for unexplained wealth order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Previous application determined on the merits

179P(2) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Court must satisfy conditions before giving leave for unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179P Additional application for an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must satisfy conditions before giving leave.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179P(2) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order

179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179Q(1) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
has part: 179Q(2) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
has part: 179Q(3) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q
schema version: 2

179Q(1) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Right to appear and adduce evidence at a hearing.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to appear and adduce evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179Q(1) Procedure on application and other notice requirements

179Q(2) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Notice requirement for contesting order making
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

179Q(3) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: DPP may appear and adduce evidence at the hearing.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to appear and adduce evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: may

179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179R(1) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179R(2) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179R(3) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179R(4) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r
schema version: 2

179R(1) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Civil debt due by the person to the Commonwealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil debt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: due

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179R(1) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order

179R(2) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: An unexplained wealth order against a person may be enforced as if it were an order made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a relation between the order and the debt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a relation between the order and the debt.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the order as a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth.
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforces an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: enforcement
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to comply with the order is diffused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to comply with the order.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a trace between the order and the debt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a trace between the order and the debt.
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179R(2) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order

179R(3) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Debt is considered a judgment debt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Debt is considered a judgment debt.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Debt is a judgment debt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⊢
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179R(3) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order

179R(4) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order after death
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between unexplained wealth order and person's death
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval between two events

179S Property subject to a person’s effective control
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Subject to effective control
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179s-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179s
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179s-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179S Property subject to a person’s effective control

179SA Legal expenses
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179SA(1) Legal expenses
has part: 179SA(2) Legal expenses
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179sa
schema version: 2

179SA(1) Legal expenses
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Court may order specified property not available to satisfy unexplained wealth order for legal expenses.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179SA Legal expenses

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the court.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

179SA(2) Legal expenses
type: Concept
description: Certification that legal expenses have been properly incurred
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Court may require certification of proper legal expenses before paying expenses from property covered by an order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179SA Legal expenses

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to require certification
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179SA(2) Legal expenses

179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179T(1) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
has part: 179T(2) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
has part: 179T(3) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t
schema version: 2

179T(1) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Registrar must issue certificate if court makes unexplained wealth order exceeding jurisdiction.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must issue certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179T(1) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction

179T(2) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Court must register certificate in a court having jurisdiction with respect to the recovery of debts.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179T(2) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction

179T(3) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Certificate is enforceable as a final judgment of the court in favour of the Commonwealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enforce certificate as final judgment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179T(3) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction

179U Parliamentary supervision
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179U(1) Parliamentary supervision
has part: 179U(2) Parliamentary supervision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179u
schema version: 2

179U(1) Parliamentary supervision
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Subject to parliamentary oversight
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179U Parliamentary supervision

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Oversight required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subject to oversight
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJCT
premise text: (1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179U(1) Parliamentary supervision

179U(2) Parliamentary supervision
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Committee may require agencies to appear before it and give evidence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179U Parliamentary supervision

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Committee must require agencies to appear before it and give evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 284(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Property may be enforced as if it were the person's property.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement against property as if it were the person's property.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Granting of restraining order in respect of property
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make a restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

18(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: DPP must give written notice of application to person subject to unexplained wealth order and any person with interest in property.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: May appear and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May appear and adduce evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: May provide evidence
modality: Epistemic
operator: MAY

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

19 Paragraph 284(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

2 Paragraph 5(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Omit 'and literary proceeds', substitute ', literary proceeds and unexplained wealth amounts'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'and literary proceeds'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Requires document for identifying or locating property of a person with suspected excessive wealth.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 285(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Insertion of section 282A after section 282
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires document for identifying or locating property.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

20A Restraining orders—unexplained wealth
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Restrict property disposal or handling without court order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20A Restraining orders—unexplained wealth

21 Subsection 285(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

22 Subsection 285(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Person's liability under unexplained wealth order is discharged to the extent of credit.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Discharge obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

23 At the end of section 286
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Credit money to Confiscated Assets Account in satisfaction of liability under Unexplained Wealth Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Official Trustee
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 At the end of section 286

24 After paragraph 296(3)(f)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Inserts amount into subsection 179R(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 After paragraph 296(3)(f)

25 Paragraph 322(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Omit specific words from a penalty order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific words
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

26 Subsection 322(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

27 After subsection 322(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Appeal against unexplained wealth order or related order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Appeal against targeted order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (2) and (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 After subsection 322(4)

28 Subsection 335(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Insertion of phrase after 'order'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 282A(1) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
has part: 282A(2) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
has part: 282A(3) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
has part: 282A(4) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a
schema version: 2

282A(1) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Court may direct Official Trustee to pay Commonwealth from restrained property.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

282A(2) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Court direction to Official Trustee regarding unexplained wealth order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the *restraining order: ...and (b) relates to property that constitutes part of the person’s *total wealth.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between restraining order and unexplained wealth order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps-with
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...such a direction in the order if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion in court order
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the *restraining order: ...and (b) relates to property that constitutes part of the person’s *total wealth.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion in restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...property that constitutes part of the person’s *total wealth.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of property in unexplained wealth order
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 282A(2) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to

282A(3) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Court may direct Official Trustee to take action against person with unexplained wealth order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 282A(3) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to

282A(4) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Court direction to Official Trustee on unexplained wealth order or restraining order application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Direction made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to make direction
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Application by DPP

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 282A(4) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to

29 At the end of section 335
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: States and Territories with jurisdiction to deal with criminal matters on indictment have proceeds jurisdiction for preliminary unexplained wealth orders or unexplained wealth orders.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States and Territories have jurisdiction to deal with criminal matters on indictment.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 At the end of section 335

29A Court may exclude property from a restraining order made
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Court may exclude property from a restraining order made under section 20A.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exclusion may occur at any time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The court to which an application for a *restraining order under section 20A was made may...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits exclusion of property from a restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The court to which an application for a *restraining order under section 20A was made may...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to exclude property.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: ...the court to which an application for a *restraining order under section 20A was made may...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exclusion may be repeated.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29A Court may exclude property from a restraining order made

3 Paragraph 5(e)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Omit 'and literary proceeds', substitute ', literary proceeds and unexplained wealth amounts'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'and literary proceeds'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30 Section 336
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Substitute 'literary proceeds or wealth' for 'or literary proceeds'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the legislative body
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

31 Section 336
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Substitute 'literary proceeds or wealth' for 'or literary proceeds'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Section 336

32 After section 336
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Section 338 (definition of confiscation order)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Substitute clause in definition of confiscation order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace clause with new one
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

336A Meaning of property or wealth being lawfully acquired
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Property or wealth is lawfully acquired if it was and the consideration for it was.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-336a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: A

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 336A Meaning of property or wealth being lawfully acquired

34 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Definition of 'lawfully acquired' affected by section 336A.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Requires person to appear before court under section 179B.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies 'unexplained wealth order' as a preliminary order.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 Section 338

36 Section 338 (definition of restraining order)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Substitute “20 or 20A” for “or 20”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to follow the substitution.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

37 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: same meaning
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: CogAI
operator: same meaning
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: Deontic
operator: same meaning
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: Diffusion
operator: same meaning
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: LTL
operator: same meaning
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.

38 Section 338 (definition of suspect)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Defines 'suspect' in relation to restraining orders and confiscation orders.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the 'suspect' term into a category.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Section 338 (definition of suspect)

39 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Defines total wealth for a person.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 At the end of section 7
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Add unexplained wealth orders requiring payment of unexplained wealth amounts.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Property specified in the application must not be disposed of or otherwise dealt with.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disposal or other handling of specified property.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: grounds on which authorised officer holds suspicions
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Affidavit must include grounds for suspicions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit must be supported by an affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

4(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Court may order specified property disposal for meeting legal expenses.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

4(3B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Court may make order despite section 24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order under subsection (3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to follow court order
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Section 24

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(3B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

4(3C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Certification of proper legal expenses
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Court may refuse to make restraining order if costs assessor does not certify proper expenses.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment of expenses is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court prohibits payment of expenses without certification
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court may require certification

4(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Court may refuse restraining order if not in public interest.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to refuse
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires payment of unexplained wealth amounts.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 At the end of section 7

40 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Defines unexplained wealth amount
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unexplained wealth amount
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

41 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Definition of 'unexplained wealth order'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Section 338

42 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Definition of wealth
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

43 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of pecuniary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Add pecuniary penalty order or unexplained wealth order within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds pecuniary penalty order or unexplained wealth order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Add

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of pecuniary

44 Subparagraph 3(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

45A Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45A(1) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
has part: 45A(2) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45a
schema version: 2

45A(1) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Cease restraining order if no application for unexplained wealth order is made within 28 days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cease to be in force at the end of this time interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time interval of 28 days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: Restraining order was made on or after the start of this time interval.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspect is subject to unexplained wealth order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classify as unexplained wealth order
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: No application for unexplained wealth order has been made within 28 days.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cease to be in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cease action
modality: Deontic
operator: Cease
premise text: Restraining order made under section 20A.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cease to be in force if no application for unexplained wealth order is made within 28 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse information about ceasing restraining order
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: Restraining order made under section 20A.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cease to be in force at the end of this time interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Cease action until new application is made
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: No application for unexplained wealth order has been made within 28 days.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(1) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth

45A(2) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) an application for an *unexplained wealth order is made in relation to the *suspect to whom the restraining order relates;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restraining order ceases to be in force
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...

5 After section 20
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(4A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 6(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 6(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 29(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Substitute section numbers
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

6(4A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Court may order costs on an indemnity basis if restraining order is refused.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to order costs on an indemnity basis.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(4A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

6(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Court may make a restraining order even if there is no risk of the property being disposed of or otherwise dealt with.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

6(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: No property acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acquiring property after a restraining order is made.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.

7 After section 29
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Insert clause after section 29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Paragraph 35(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Inserts 'or 29A' after '29'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 8(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

8(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Ceases to be in force if unexplained wealth order is made or appealed
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with unexplained wealth orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies cessation of restraining order if unexplained wealth order is made or appealed
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognizes cessation of restraining order if unexplained wealth order is made or appealed
modality: CogAI
operator: COGNIZES
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses to unexplained wealth orders
modality: Diffusion
operator: DIFFUSES
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...

8(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Court may order costs on an indemnity basis if a restraining order ceases.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to make costs orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

9 Subsection 39(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Inserts a number after a note.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Section 7
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Substitute 'a number of' for section 5.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 7

10 Subsection 4(1) (before paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.43
note: Amendment of proceeds of crime order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1) (before paragraph (a) of the definition of

100 Subsection 272(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 272(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-100
schema version: 2

101 Subsection 272(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 272(2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-101
schema version: 2

102 Section 273 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-102
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

103 Subsection 274(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Substitute 'A person' for '(1) A person'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-103
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103 Subsection 274(1)

104 Subsection 274(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 274(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-104
schema version: 2

105 Section 275 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' and substitute 'Penalty:'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-105-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-105
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'Maximum penalty:',
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

106 Subsection 42(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Court may revoke restraining order under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-106
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order may be revoked
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Court has power to revoke order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106 Subsection 42(5)

107 Application and transitional
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Application and transitional provisions for revocation of restraining orders
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-107
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

11 Paragraph 18(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: There are reasonable grounds to suspect that a person has committed a serious offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Paragraph 18(1)(d)

12 Paragraph 18(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Authorised officer suspects suspect committed offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigate suspect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: suspect
premise text: Authorised officer suspects suspect committed offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Paragraph 18(3)(a)

13 At the end of subparagraph 19(1)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Add “and”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State must add “and”.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 At the end of subparagraph 19(1)(d)(ii)

14 Paragraph 19(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Omit specific clause from terrorism offence provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

149 Court may confirm pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Court may confirm pecuniary penalty order if satisfied
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-149
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to confirm the order
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149 Court may confirm pecuniary penalty order

15 Application of amendments of sections 18 and 19
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Application of amendments for a restraining order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

15A Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Grounds for freezing an account exist
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The freezing order can be made during certain offences
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Freezing order can be made during certain offences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The account must be frozen
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Account has grounds for freezing
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grounds for freezing exist if and only if the account is with a financial institution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Grounds for freezing exist if and only if account is with financial institution
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grounds for freezing exist for all accounts with a financial institution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Grounds for freezing exist for all accounts with financial institution
modality: LTL
operator: for-all
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15A Simplified outline of this Part

15B Making freezing orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15B(1) Making freezing orders
has part: 15B(2) Making freezing orders
has part: 15B(3) Making freezing orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b
schema version: 2

15B(1) Making freezing orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Magistrate must order a financial institution not to allow a withdrawal from an account under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15B Making freezing orders

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the balance of the account will be reduced so that a person will not be deprived of all or some of such proceeds...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Account balance is subject to freezing order for a specified period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: ...unless an order is made under this section, there is a risk that the balance of the account will be reduced...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate prohibits a financial institution from allowing a withdrawal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: A magistrate must order that...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has an obligation to order a financial institution not to allow a withdrawal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: A magistrate must order that...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has permission to order a financial institution not to allow a withdrawal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) A magistrate must order that...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Magistrate must order a financial institution to freeze an account under certain circumstances.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) A magistrate must order that...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15B(1) Making freezing orders

15B(2) Making freezing orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Order covers the balance of the account from time to time.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15B Making freezing orders

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15B(2) Making freezing orders

15B(3) Making freezing orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: No finding required for reasonable grounds and satisfaction
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15B Making freezing orders

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15B(3) Making freezing orders

15C Affidavit supporting application made in person
type: Concept
description: affidavit supporting application made in person
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Application for freezing order must be supported by affidavit of authorised officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15c
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be supported by affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15C Affidavit supporting application made in person

15D Applying for freezing orders by telephone or other electronic
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: An authorised officer may apply for a freezing order by telephone or other electronic means.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15d
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a part of a larger provision.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15D Applying for freezing orders by telephone or other electronic

15E Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15E(1) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(2) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(3) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(4) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(5) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(6) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(7) Making order by telephone etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e
schema version: 2

15E(1) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Magistrate must issue freezing order if urgent and delay would frustrate effectiveness.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must issue freezing order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15E(2) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: telephone, fax or other electronic means
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Inform applicant of freezing order terms and signing time.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Informing applicant is a predicate about the magistrate and applicant
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT-PREDICATE RELATIONSHIP

15E(3) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Applicant must complete a form and provide specific information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicant must complete a form.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15E(3) Making order by telephone etc.

15E(4) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Provide a completed freezing order form to the magistrate within two working days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a completed freezing order form.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15E(5) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: affidavit supporting the application and meeting the description in section 15C
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Must provide affidavit before freezing order is made.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15E(6) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Failure to comply with subsection (5) results in the freezing order never having had effect.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance with subsection (5)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

15E(7) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: documents provided under subsection (4) and (5)
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Attach form of freezing order to documents
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attach form of freezing order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15F Unsigned freezing orders in court proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Court must assume freezing order was not duly made unless proved
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15f
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order not assumed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits court from assuming order was made
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court must assume order was made unless proved

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15F Unsigned freezing orders in court proceedings

15G Offence for making false statements in applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Making false statements in applications is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15g
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15G Offence for making false statements in applications

15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15H(1) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
has part: 15H(2) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
has part: 15H(3) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
has part: 15H(4) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h
schema version: 2

15H(1) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: False statements of magistrate names in documents with freezing orders
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to temporal interval of document creation or issuance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Document created or issued

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relates to knowledge representation of document content
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: *freezing order under section 15E

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years or 120 penalty units, or both.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits false statements of magistrate names in documents with freezing orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relates to information flow from document creation to issuance
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
premise text: Document created or issued

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Relates to temporal interval of document validity
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Document valid for a certain period

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15H(1) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E

15H(2) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Service of unauthorised form of order is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15H(2) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E

15H(3) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Presenting a document purporting to be a freezing order under section 15E without approval from a magistrate is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of presenting a document purporting to be a freezing order under section 15E without approval from a magistrate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

15H(4) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Giving a false document to a financial institution after obtaining a freezing order is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving a false document to a financial institution after obtaining a freezing order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15H(4) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E

15J Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15J(1) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
has part: 15J(2) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15j
schema version: 2

15J(1) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
type: Concept
description: Things described in subsection (2)
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Applicant must serve financial institution and account holders with freezing order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to serve
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(1) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and

15J(2) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
type: Concept
description: copy of the order, written statement of name and contact details
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Service of freezing order on financial institution and enforcement agency
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on State to serve freezing order
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(2) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and

15K Freezing order does not prevent withdrawal to enable financial
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Institution can meet its liabilities despite freezing order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15k
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15K Freezing order does not prevent withdrawal to enable financial

15L Offence for contravening freezing orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Allowing withdrawal from account with freezing order is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15l
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15L Offence for contravening freezing orders

15M Protection from suits etc. for those complying with orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Protection from suits for those complying with orders
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15m
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15M Protection from suits etc. for those complying with orders

15N When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15N(1) When a freezing order is in force
has part: 15N(2) When a freezing order is in force
has part: 15N(3) When a freezing order is in force
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n
schema version: 2

15N(1) When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Order does not come into force if copy is given after end of first working day
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15N When a freezing order is in force

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This temporal relation must be greater than or equal to one working day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between order and institution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The order does not come into force if the copy is given to the institution after the end of the first working day.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order does not come into force if the copy is given after that time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: N
premise text: Given a freezing order, the institution must not be given a copy of the order after the end of the first working day.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is not the case.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Positive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Given a freezing order, the institution must give a copy of the order to itself after the end of the first working day.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is not the case.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equivalence between obligation and prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: <=>
premise text: Given a freezing order, the institution must give a copy of the order to itself after the end of the first working day.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This temporal relation must be less than or equal to one working day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between order and institution
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: The order comes into force when a copy of the order is given to the institution.

15N(2) When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Freezing order duration
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15N When a freezing order is in force

15N(3) When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Freezing order cannot specify a period of more than 3 working days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15N When a freezing order is in force

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits a specific action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

15P Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15P(1) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(2) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(3) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(4) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(5) Order extending a freezing order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p
schema version: 2

15P(1) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Magistrate may extend freezing order period under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has the power to extend freezing order period.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15P(1) Order extending a freezing order

15P(2) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Extension of freezing order duration
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension of freezing order duration
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

15P(3) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Copy of freezing order must be given to financial institution before extension ceases.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide copy of freezing order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15P(3) Order extending a freezing order

15P(4) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Applying provisions to an order extending a freezing order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15P(4) Order extending a freezing order

15P(5) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Affidavit must identify the freezing order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The affidavit must identify the freezing order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit must contain specific information
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
premise text: Section 15C requires an affidavit supporting an application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15P(5) Order extending a freezing order

15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15Q(1) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
has part: 15Q(2) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
has part: 15Q(3) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q
schema version: 2

15Q(1) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Allow withdrawal from account to meet certain expenses
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to meet one or more of the following...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap for expenses
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) the reasonable living expenses of the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a specified debt incurred in good faith by the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of debt
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (d) a specified debt incurred in good faith by the person.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the institution may allow a withdrawal from the account...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) A magistrate may vary a freezing order...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the reasonable business expenses of the person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of expenses to dependants
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (c) the reasonable business expenses of the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the reasonable living expenses of any of the dependants of the person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for expenses
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (b) the reasonable living expenses of any of the dependants of the person;

15Q(2) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: the magistrate is satisfied that the expense or debt does not, nor will not, relate to legal costs that the person has incurred, nor will incur, in connection with proceedings under this Act; or proceedings for an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: a person in whose name the account is held has applied for the variation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: the person has notified the DPP in writing of the application and the grounds for the application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: the magistrate is satisfied that the person cannot meet the expense or debt out of property that is not covered by: a freezing order; or a restraining order; or an interstate restraining order; or a foreign restraining order that is registered under the Mutual Assistance Act

15Q(3) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Written notice must be given to financial institution before variation takes effect.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Written notice is a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

15R Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15R(1) Application to revoke a freezing order
has part: 15R(2) Application to revoke a freezing order
has part: 15R(3) Application to revoke a freezing order
has part: 15R(4) Application to revoke a freezing order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r
schema version: 2

15R(1) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Application for revocation of a freezing order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to revoke a freezing order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

15R(2) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
description: Written notice of application and grounds for revocation
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Notice must be given to the enforcement agency before revocation application can be made.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15R(2) Application to revoke a freezing order

15R(3) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Additional material may be provided to the magistrate relating to the application to revoke a freezing order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide additional material
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15R(3) Application to revoke a freezing order

15R(4) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Magistrate may revoke freezing order if in interests of justice to do so.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may revoke freezing order.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

15S Notice of revocation of a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15S(1) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
has part: 15S(2) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15s
schema version: 2

15S(1) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Notify financial institution and account holders of revocation of freezing order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15S Notice of revocation of a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to notify financial institution and account holders.
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15S(1) Notice of revocation of a freezing order

15S(2) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Notifying officer must give notice to applicant for revocation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15S Notice of revocation of a freezing order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notifying officer must give notice to the applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Notifying officer need not give notice to the applicant for revocation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notifying officer must give notice to the applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: However, the notifying officer need not give notice to the applicant for revocation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15S(2) Notice of revocation of a freezing order

16 Paragraph 47(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Court must be satisfied that a person engaged in serious offences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must be satisfied
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Paragraph 47(1)(c)

17 Paragraph 49(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Application of amendments of sections 47 and 49
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Application of amendments of sections 47 and 49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Subsection 84(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Omit “(1)” from subsection 84(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Before paragraph 7(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Freezing orders limiting withdrawals from accounts with financial institutions before courts decide applications for restraining orders to cover the accounts.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits freezing orders limiting withdrawals from accounts with financial institutions before courts decide applications for restraining orders to cover the accounts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

20 Subsection 84(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 85(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Omit section 84(1)(a) and substitute with 84(a)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Subsection 85(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Substitute a provision in section 84(1)(b) with a new provision 84(b)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Subsection 85(2)

23 Subsection 110(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Omit “(1)”
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Subsection 110(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Subsection 111(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Substitute clause in section 110(1)(a)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Subsection 111(1)

26 Subsection 111(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Omit '110(1)(b)', substitute '110(b)'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
schema version: 2

266A Disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Disclosure of information required for obtaining a sworn statement under an order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-266a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires disclosure of information for obtaining a sworn statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 266A Disclosure

27 Subparagraph 116(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Omit “subject to subsection (2),”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of omission
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Magistrate must ensure balance of account is maintained to prevent deprivation of proceeds or instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Subsection 116(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must ensure balance of account is maintained.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

29 Application of amendments of section 116
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Application of amendments of section 116
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement of amendments for pecuniary penalty order

3 Before Part 2-1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 Section 149
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: all information that would be required in an ordinary application for a *freezing order and supporting affidavit
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Application for freezing order must include required information and may be made before affidavit is sworn.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must include required information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Magistrate may require communication and further information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the magistrate.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

31 Application of new section 149
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Commencement of section 149 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

32 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Omits any matter or thing without which the statement is misleading when making an application for a freezing order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Subparagraphs 202(5)(a)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Repeal subparagraphs and substitute with prohibition on engaging in serious offence conduct
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to refrain from conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting matter or thing without which the statement is misleading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

33 Subparagraphs 202(5)(c)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Repeal subparagraphs and substitute with proceeds of serious offence or instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Withdrawal from account for liability
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Subsection 202(6)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Omit “or (iii)”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'or (iii)'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘or (iii)’.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the institution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

35 Application of amendments of section 202
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Amendments apply to production orders after commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Mention of subsection 15B(1) in section 15E(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 Section 338 (paragraph (g) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Inserts 'or former section 5, 7, 7A or 86 of the Crimes Act 1914' after Criminal Code in definition of serious offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text into a legal definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: inserts

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Section 338 (paragraph (g) of the definition of serious

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

37 Subparagraph 18(2)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: No more than one authorised officer is required to give notice of revocation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 Subparagraph 18(3)(b)(iii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit 'terrorism', substitute '*serious'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No more than one officer is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: ≤

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

39 Subparagraph 19(1)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit “terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Paragraph 337A(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Insertion of 'freezing order' after 'for a'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Subparagraph 19(1)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Substitute “serious” for “terrorism”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

41 Paragraph 19(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
schema version: 2

42 Application of amendments of sections 18 and 19
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Amendments apply to applications made on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-42-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Application of amendments of sections 18 and 19

43 Subparagraph 29(2)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit 'a *terrorism', substitute 'a serious'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
schema version: 2

44 Subparagraph 29(2)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit 'any terrorism', substitute 'any serious'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2
schema version: 2

45 Subparagraph 29(2)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit “a *terrorism”, substitute ‘a serious’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits terrorism
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

46 Subparagraph 29(2)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Omit 'any terrorism', substitute 'any serious'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
schema version: 2

46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-46-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits terrorism
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

47 Paragraph 45(6)(ca)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 Application of amendments of sections 29 and 45
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Amendments apply to restraining orders made after commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
schema version: 2

48 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply to restraining orders made after commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Application of amendments of sections 29 and 45

49 At the end of section 47
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Court may refuse to make forfeiture order under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order cannot be made
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making forfeiture order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court may refuse to make order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49 At the end of section 47

5 Paragraph 337A(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Insert *freezing order or after “for a”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Application of new subsection 47(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Application of new subsection 47(4) to the making of an order on or after its commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
schema version: 2

50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2
schema version: 2

50(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Exemptions from subsection (3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain proceedings from subsection (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

50(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Prohibition on using a document in evidence against someone who produced or made it available under a production order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using the document in evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

50(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Exemption from subsection (5) for proceedings under specific sections of the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission for a specific exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

50(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Does not affect admissibility of information obtained as an indirect consequence of a disclosure under this section.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

50(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Clarifies the scope of subsection 228(2) regarding search warrants.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Establishes a relation between search warrants and enforcement agencies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a relation between search warrants and enforcement agencies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
premise text: Search warrants require clarification

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clarifies the scope of subsection 228(2)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clarifies the scope of subsection 228(2)
modality: Deontic
operator: clarification
premise text: Subsection 228(2) is ambiguous

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

51 Subparagraph 49(1)(c)(iv)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Substitute “*serious” for “*terrorism” in subsection 49(1)(c)(iv)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces a term with another
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

52 Application of amendment of subparagraph 49(1)(c)(iv)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Amendment applies to applications made on or after commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Pay Commonwealth an amount equal to the lesser of the amount paid to legal aid commission or value of property covered by restraining order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The obligation applies during the period when the person has property covered by a restraining order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay Commonwealth an amount equal to the lesser of the amount paid to legal aid commission or value of property covered by restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

53 At the end of section 49
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Court may refuse to make forfeiture order if not in public interest.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order shall not be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may refuse to make forfeiture order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court is satisfied it is not in public interest.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 At the end of section 49

54 Application of new subsection 49(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Application of new subsection 49(4) to the making of an order on or after its commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
schema version: 2

54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-2
schema version: 2

55 Subparagraph 73(1)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Omit 'a *terrorism', substitute 'a *serious'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 Subparagraph 73(1)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Omit 'any terrorism', substitute 'any serious'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
schema version: 2

56 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-56-2
schema version: 2

57 Subparagraph 73(1)(d)(iii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Replace 'terrorism' with 'serious'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
schema version: 2

58 Subparagraph 85(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

59 Subparagraph 85(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Replace terrorism with serious in subsection 85(2)(b)(ii)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
schema version: 2

6 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Definition of freezing order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

60 Application of amendments of sections 73 and 85
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Application of amendments of sections 73 and 85
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-60-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
schema version: 2

61 Subparagraph 111(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
schema version: 2

62 Subparagraph 111(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Replace terrorism with serious
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
schema version: 2

63 Application of amendments of section 111
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Amendments of section 111 apply to quashing convictions on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63 Application of amendments of section 111

64 Section 8
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'Chapter 3'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
schema version: 2

65 At the end of section 8
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Authorises disclosure of information for certain purposes
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65 At the end of section 8

66 At the end of subsection 223(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: List of persons with functions under the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority function
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership in an authority
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
premise text: Person is or forms part of an authority

67 At the end of Chapter 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
schema version: 2

68 Section 292
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Repeal a section
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals a section
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69(1) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
has part: 69(2) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
has part: 69(2A) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
schema version: 2

69(1) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Legal aid commission must pay costs for certain representations.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The legal aid commission has a duty to pay costs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (a) and (b)

69(2) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission out of Confiscated Assets Account
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission out of Confiscated Assets Account
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

69(2A) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission out of property covered by the restraining order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2A) If the *Official Trustee is satisfied that: (a) the balance of the *Confiscated Assets Account is insufficient to pay the legal costs; and (b) property of the person is covered by the *restraining order; the Official Trustee must pay the legal costs (according to the bill) to the *legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Legal costs and legal aid commission expenses overlap in time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The Official Trustee pays legal costs.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Official Trustee must pay legal costs.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Official Trustee must pay the legal costs (according to the bill) to the *legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Official Trustee has an obligation to pay legal costs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Official Trustee must pay legal costs.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2A) If the *Official Trustee is satisfied that: (a) the balance of the *Confiscated Assets Account is insufficient to pay the legal costs; and (b) property of the person is covered by the *restraining order; the Official Trustee must pay the legal costs (according to the bill) to the *legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Legal costs are repeatedly paid from the Confiscated Assets Account.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: The Official Trustee pays legal costs.

7 Section 338
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Definition of working day
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Section 338

70 Division 1 of Part 4-4
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Repeal Division 1 of Part 4-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Application of amendments of Chapter 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Amendments apply to costs incurred before or on commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply to costs incurred before or on commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

72 Subsection 37(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 37(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
schema version: 2

73 Subsection 37(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 37(2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’

74 Section 40 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

75 Section 71 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit “Maximum penalty:”, substitute “Penalty:”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-75-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
schema version: 2

76 Section 195 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

77 Subsection 196(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 196(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
schema version: 2

78 Section 199 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

79 Section 200 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Application of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Application

80 Subsection 201(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 201(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’

81 Section 209 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

82 Subsection 210(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' and substitute 'Penalty:'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'Maximum penalty:',
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

83 Subsection 210(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 210(2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-83
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’

84 Subsection 211(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' and substitute with 'Penalty:'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-84-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-84
schema version: 2

85 Section 212 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-85
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

86 Section 216 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-86
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

87 Section 217 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-87
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

88 Section 218 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-88
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

89 Section 222 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section 222.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-89
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 21E(4) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Insert 'freezing orders' after 'for' in subsection 21E(4)(a) of the definition of confiscation proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits inserting 'freezing orders' after 'for'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

90 Subsection 223(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 223(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-90
schema version: 2

91 Subsection 223(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 223(2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-91
schema version: 2

92 Subsection 223(3) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 223(3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-92
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’

93 Section 224 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-93
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

94 Section 232 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-94
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

95 Section 233 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Omit “Maximum penalty:”, substitute “Penalty:”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-95
schema version: 2

96 Section 234 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-96
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

97 Section 235 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-97
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

98 Subsection 246(3) (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 246(3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-98-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-98
schema version: 2

99 Section 266 (penalty)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-99
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Subsection 3(1) (definition of ACC authorising officer)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal the definition of ACC authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Parts IAB and IAC
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Repeal Parts and substitute with new Part IAB
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-100
schema version: 2

100(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Information about possession of narcotic goods
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Law enforcement agencies and individuals must report possession of narcotic goods.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report possession of narcotic goods
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

100(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Identify the law enforcement agency of which the person is an officer if they are a law enforcement officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must identify the law enforcement agency.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

100(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Identifying a person by assumed name or code is permitted if it can be matched to the person's identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifying a person by assumed name or code is permitted if it can be matched to the person's identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: A register kept under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A register kept under this section is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-102-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-102
schema version: 2

104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-104-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-104
schema version: 2

106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 106(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-106
schema version: 2

106(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Ombudsman must give information to authority under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-106-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

106(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Ombudsman may receive information from State or Territory inspecting authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-106-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Receiving obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: receives

108 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Acquire an assumed identity, means acquire evidence of the assumed identity and includes taking steps towards acquiring evidence of the identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-108
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquire an assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes taking steps towards acquiring evidence of the identity.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 108 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

11 Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Court discretion not limited by this Part in admitting or excluding evidence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court discretion not limited by this Part in admitting or excluding evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Relationship to other laws and matters

110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Request for production of evidence of assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency is an obligation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-110
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as obligation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

112 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Use an assumed identity is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-112
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits use of assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies 'use an assumed identity' as a prohibited action.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Chief officer may require additional information from applicant.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-114
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: require

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Evaluation of application
modality: Epistemic
operator: consideration

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 116(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-116
schema version: 2

116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Authority to use assumed identity in foreign country is conditional on satisfaction of reasonable necessity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-116-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The authority to use the assumed identity in a foreign country is conditional on satisfaction of reasonable necessity.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Authority to use assumed identity in foreign country is conditional on satisfaction of reasonable necessity.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Separate authority required for each assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-116-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

116(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: An authority is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-116-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No, an authority is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: An authority is a legislative instrument.

118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 118(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 118(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 118(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 118(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-118
schema version: 2

118(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Chief officer must give written notice of variation or cancellation to authorised person and supervisor.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

118(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Reason
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Authority must state reason for variation or cancellation of notice.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must state the reason for varying or cancelling the notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reason
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

118(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Variation or cancellation of authority takes effect on specified day
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

118(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: A variation of an authority is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A variation of an authority is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

12 Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Participant not criminally responsible for Commonwealth offence if conduct was authorized and met certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct must occur before or at the same time as the commencement of the operation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The conduct must overlap with the commencement of the operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This item applies to a participant in an operation authorised under a State controlled operations law if:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant is not criminally responsible if they meet these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to comply with conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The participant engaged in conduct, whether before, on or after commencement, in the course of, and for the purposes of, the operation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant is permitted to engage in conduct that meets these conditions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has permission to engage in conduct if it meets certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) Despite any other law of the Commonwealth, the participant is not criminally responsible for the Commonwealth offence, if:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct must occur repeatedly over time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The conduct must repeat over time.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (b) The participant engaged in conduct, whether before, on or after commencement, in the course of, and for the purposes of, the operation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct

120 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Chief officer must apply for order to cancel entry within 28 days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-120
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-122-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-122
schema version: 2

124 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Duty to meet requirements under regulations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-124
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requirements are met during authorized activity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to meet requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to meet requirements without obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requirements are met until authorized activity ends
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 126(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 126(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 126(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 126(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-126
schema version: 2

126(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Transfer of authority control
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Transfer of authority control at a specific time

126(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Control of authority not transferred until supervisor appointed.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority control transfer depends on supervisor appointment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (4)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

126(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Chief officer must vary authority in accordance with section 15KE.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information about supervisor's name.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

126(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Control of an authority must not be transferred under this section if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: must_not

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 128(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-128
schema version: 2

128(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Request must state it is a request under this section.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-128-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request must state it is a request under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Request for entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-128-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

13 Effect of item 12 on other laws relating to criminal
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Item 12 does not apply to certain conduct authorized under Commonwealth or State laws.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Effect of item 12 on other laws relating to criminal

130 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Omit references to State or Territory offences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-130-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-130
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

132 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in subsection (4)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-132
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

134 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-134-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-134
schema version: 2

136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: Defines senior officer positions across various agencies.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-136
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of senior officer positions.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies senior officers by agency and position.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

138 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Defines terms related to witness identity protection certificates and court proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-138-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-138
schema version: 2

14 Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person is not criminally responsible for ancillary conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect from criminal responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: State must provide protection

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

140 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Restrictions on disclosure of evidence and proceedings
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-140
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (c) the discovery, exchange, production, inspection or disclosure of intended evidence, documents and reports of persons intended to be called by a party to give evidence;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restrictions on sentencing proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (d) a sentencing proceeding;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between restricted activities
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
premise text: (c) the discovery, exchange, production, inspection or disclosure of intended evidence, documents and reports of persons intended to be called by a party to give evidence;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between restricted activities
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
premise text: (d) a sentencing proceeding;

142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 142(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-142
schema version: 2

142(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries to ascertain required information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer MUST make reasonable enquiries.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

142(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Statutory declaration from operative
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Chief officer must obtain statutory declaration from operative before issuing certificate.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide statutory declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

142(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Cannot appeal against, review, quash or invalidate a decision to give a witness identity protection certificate.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Appeal is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of appeal against decision
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Decision is final

142(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Does not prevent questioning of identity protection certificate in disciplinary proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes exclusion from disciplinary proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (4)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

142(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: A witness identity protection certificate is prima facie evidence of its contents.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters in the certificate;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The certificate is valid during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be taken to be such a certificate and to have been properly issued;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The certificate is taken to be properly issued.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes as true
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters in the certificate;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The certificate is prima facie evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes as true
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters in the certificate;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The certificate is valid during a specific time period.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

142(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: A witness identity protection certificate is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits witness identity protection certificates from being legislative instruments.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

144 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-144-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-144
schema version: 2

146 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Witnesses and persons involved in proceedings cannot disclose operative's identity or location.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-146
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity or location.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies individuals involved in proceedings as persons who must not disclose operative's identity or location.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 146 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 148(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(12) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148
schema version: 2

148(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Court may make order to protect operative's identity or prevent disclosure of location.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an order made under subsections (8), (9) or (10) is a crime.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The crime overlaps with the order in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal overlap between the crime and the order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is a crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that contravenes an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The individual is obligated to comply with the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on individuals to comply with the order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The crime repeats indefinitely.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the repeating nature of the crime.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(12) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited by subsection (11)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-12
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited by subsection (11)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(12) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Definition of 'person involved in the proceeding'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Grant leave for party or lawyer to do anything mentioned in paragraph (2)(a)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Court must be satisfied about evidence before giving leave or making an order regarding operative's credibility.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Satisfying condition for court action
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfies

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal ordering of conditions
modality: LTL
operator: ordered by

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Application must be heard in the absence of a jury.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to hear application in the absence of a jury.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Court must be closed during proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court closure prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

148(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Court must suppress publication of certain information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must prohibit publication.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (8) The court must make an order suppressing the publication of anything said when...

148(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Publication of court transcript is prohibited without court order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: ...but the court may make an order suppressing its publication.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15 Evidence of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: A document purporting to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law is admissible in any legal proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is admissible in any legal proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admission of the document as evidence in legal proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Admission
premise text: The document purports to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person granting the authority was satisfied of the facts they were required to be satisfied of.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Proof of the facts required to grant the authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Proof
premise text: In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the document is proof in any proceedings.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person granting the authority is authorized to grant the authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization of the person granting the authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
premise text: The person granting the authority was satisfied of the facts they were required to be satisfied of.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is admissible in any legal proceedings if it purports to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of the document's authenticity on its admissibility.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: If the document purports to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law, then it is admissible in any legal proceedings.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Evidence of authorities

150 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Court must allow person or legal representative to appear and be heard if joined as respondent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-150
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must allow appearance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

152 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-152-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-152
schema version: 2

154 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-154-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-154
schema version: 2

156 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Prohibition of disclosure of operative's identity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-156-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-156-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-156
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-156-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

158 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-158-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-158
schema version: 2

15G Objects of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Exempts law enforcement officers and certain other persons from criminal liability and civil liability in the course of a controlled operation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15g
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No liability for the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts individuals from liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Law enforcement officers and certain other persons are exempt from criminal liability and civil liability.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers are permitted to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory without liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits law enforcement officers and certain other persons to engage in activities without liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The exemption permits law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers have an obligation to take part in controlled operations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on law enforcement officers and certain other persons to take part in controlled operations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The exemption requires law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers have the right to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory without liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants law enforcement officers and certain other persons the right to engage in activities without liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: The exemption grants law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation the right to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is established for law enforcement officers and certain other persons under specific conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the scope and conditions of exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
premise text: The exemption applies to law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation and certain other persons who follow instructions from a law enforcement officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15G Objects of Part

15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
has part: 15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ga
schema version: 2

15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Court discretion not limited by this Part
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters

15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Disregard evidence obtained from criminal activity under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The criminal activity was conduct constituting an offence for which a person would, but for section 15HH, be criminally responsible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between controlled operations and criminal activities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (ii) the person was a participant in an operation authorized under a corresponding State controlled operations law acting in the course of that operation...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of evidence based on criminal activity
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if... (i) the person was a participant in a controlled operation authorized under this Part acting in the course of the controlled operation; and (ii) the criminal activity was controlled conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of certain conditions in the exclusion of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) both: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if... (i) the person was a participant in an operation authorized under a corresponding State controlled operations law acting in the course of that operation; and (ii) the criminal activity was conduct constituting an offence for which a person would, but for section 15HH, be criminally responsible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of certain conditions in the exclusion of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) both: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115...

15GB Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.63
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gb
schema version: 2

15GC Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.63
note: Definitions for controlled operations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gc-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gc-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gc
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gc-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
has part: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gd
schema version: 2

15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Defines controlled operation and major controlled.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes when a controlled operation begins and ends.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Note: Section 15GN specifies when a controlled operation begins and ends.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a controlled operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) A controlled operation is an operation that:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Defines a major controlled operation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the duration of a major controlled operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: ...for a period of more than 7 days;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a controlled operation that is...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a controlled operation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) A major controlled operation is...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines the scope of a major controlled operation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPartOf
premise text: (a) involve the infiltration...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies the duration of a major controlled operation
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (a) involve the infiltration...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the duration of a major controlled operation
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: ...for a period of more than 7 days;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
has part: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ge
schema version: 2

15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Defines serious Commonwealth offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence has a specific duration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) involves a matter mentioned in subsection (2); and (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence is defined
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) involves a matter mentioned in subsection (2); and (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence has a specific definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) involves a matter mentioned in subsection (2); and (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence has a specific scope
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: List of serious Commonwealth offences and serious State offences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: as from the commencement of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of the list
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: The matters are as follows:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) theft;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of serious offence
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) The matters are as follows:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(4) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf
schema version: 2

15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Any of the following is an authorising officer for a controlled operation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner during the investigation of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the Australian Federal Police.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) if the operation is a major controlled operation and the investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the Australian Federal Police—the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner, or any AFP authorising officer, or any ACC authorising officer, or any ACLEI authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorising officer
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) Any of the following is an authorising officer for a controlled operation:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.

15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: List of AFP authorising officers
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or a senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which the obligation applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or a senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the bearer of the obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or a senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which the obligation applies
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.

15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Defines who is an ACC authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and who is authorised in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the ACC for the purposes of this paragraph.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the Chief Executive Officer and other staff members.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) a member of the staff of the ACC who is an SES employee

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The following are ACC authorising officers:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and who is authorised in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the ACC for the purposes of this paragraph.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the relationship between staff members and the Chief Executive Officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: isAuthorisedTo
premise text: (b) a member of the staff of the ACC who is an SES employee

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.

15GF(4) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: List of ACLEI authorising officers
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACLEI authorising officers: ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies ACLEI authorising officers
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GF(4) Meaning of authorising officer etc.

15GG Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GG(1) Minister may nominate AAT members
has part: 15GG(2) Minister may nominate AAT members
has part: 15GG(3) Minister may nominate AAT members
has part: 15GG(4) Minister may nominate AAT members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg
schema version: 2

15GG(1) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: The Minister may nominate AAT members.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for nomination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WithinTemporalInterval

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to nominate
modality: Deontic
operator: May

15GG(2) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
description: Qualifications for nomination
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Must nominate AAT members with specific qualifications
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must meet qualifications
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to nominate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Minister has power to nominate AAT members

15GG(3) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Minister must withdraw nomination if ceases to hold appointment or by writing.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to withdraw nomination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

15GG(4) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Protection and immunity for nominated Tribunal members
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: nominated Tribunal member
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Justice of the High Court

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GG(4) Minister may nominate AAT members

15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh
schema version: 2

15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Application for authority to conduct controlled operation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Application method for authorities to conduct controlled operations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key can be made at any time before the controlled operation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application can be made at any time before the controlled operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key specifies an application method
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application method is specified
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An application may be made by means of a written document or orally, in person, or by telephone

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key specifies an application type
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application type is specified
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An application may be made for an authority to conduct a controlled operation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key is part of a formal application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Part of a formal application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: An application is a formal application if it is signed by the applicant

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key is part of an urgent application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Part of an urgent application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: An application is an urgent application if it is made orally, in person, or by telephone

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key must be made before the controlled operation starts
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application must be made before the controlled operation starts
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: The success of the controlled operation depends on making an application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Application for authority must be formal if previous application exists.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for authority must be formal if previous application exists.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
description: sufficient information, earlier application details, proposed period of effect
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Application requirements for controlled operations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide required information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GI Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GI(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(2) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(3) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(4) Determination of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi
schema version: 2

15GI(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Authorise controlled operation with conditions or without
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority granted or refused
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant authority with conditions or without
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: Authorising officer considers application and additional information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GI(1) Determination of applications

15GI(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Authorising officer must not grant authority to conduct controlled operation unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on granting authority unless conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GI(2) Determination of applications

15GI(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Authorising officer must authorise controlled operation within specific meaning.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GI(3) Determination of applications

15GI(4) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Authority granted under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (4) An authority granted under this section is not a legislative instrument.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GI(4) Determination of applications

15GJ Manner of granting authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.73
note: Authority to conduct a controlled operation may be granted by means of a written document, oral communication, or telephone.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gj
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to conduct a controlled operation may be granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Grant

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Excerpt describes authority to conduct a controlled operation.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

15GK Form of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GK(1) Form of authority
has part: 15GK(2) Form of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gk
schema version: 2

15GK(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
description: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Formal authority requirements
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GK Form of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must be granted by a principal law enforcement officer
modality: Deontic
operator: >

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GK(1) Form of authority

15GK(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
description: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Authority must provide specific details about the operation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GK Form of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must provide details.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GK(2) Form of authority

15GL Written record of urgent authority must be issued
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Authorising officer must issue written record of urgent authority within 7 days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gl-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gl
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written record of urgent authority
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Authorising officer may nominate another person as principal law enforcement officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gm-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gm
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gm-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer

15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn
schema version: 2

15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Commencement and duration of authorities
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities

15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Clarifies commencement and duration of urgent authorities.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities

15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Authority duration and cancellation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities

15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go
schema version: 2

15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Authority may be varied by authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to vary
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal extension of authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
premise text: (2) A variation may:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension or modification of authority
modality: Deontic
operator: variation
premise text: (2) A variation may:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Cannot extend urgent authority period
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: extends
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
modality: CogAI
operator: extends
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of extending urgent authority period
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
modality: Diffusion
operator: extends
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
modality: LTL
operator: extends
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(5) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(6) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(7) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(8) Application to appropriate authorising officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp
schema version: 2

15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Permits application for variation of authority to an appropriate authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: No application for variation can extend the period of effect beyond 3 months.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on extending the period of effect beyond 3 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Application method for variation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Multiple applications for variation under section can be made.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Multiple applications for variation under section can be made.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GP(5) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Must state earlier urgent variation application details
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GP(5) Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GP(6) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
description: Proposed period of extension
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Application must state proposed period of extension not exceeding 3 months.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding 3 months
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15GP(7) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Authorising officer may require applicant to provide information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May impose obligation on the authorising officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GP(7) Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GP(8) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Applicant must make a written record and give it to the authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a written record and give it to the authorising officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GP(8) Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
has part: 15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gq
schema version: 2

15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Authorising officer may vary authority subject to conditions or refuse application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary authority
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority

15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Must not vary an authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An appropriate authorising officer must not vary an authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

15GR Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
has part: 15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gr
schema version: 2

15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Authority may be varied by an appropriate authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority

15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Authorising officer must provide written document to applicant or principal law enforcement officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15GS Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Variation of authority must identify controlled operation, person varying authority, and application details.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gs
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specific information for authority variation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GS Form of variation of authority

15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt
schema version: 2

15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Authority to vary formal authority on application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Variation of formal authority
modality: Deontic
operator: may

15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in the text

15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Maximum extension period for formal authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to a certain point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Extension period must be less than or equal to a certain point in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period must be less than or equal to 24 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 24 months
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period must be less than or equal to 3 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension period cannot exceed 3 months
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to a certain value
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension period must be less than or equal to a certain value
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to a certain interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Extension period must be less than or equal to a certain interval
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: May only vary formal authority within 2 weeks before the end of its period of effect.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May only
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only

15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GU(1) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(2) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(3) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(4) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(5) Application to nominated Tribunal member
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu
schema version: 2

15GU(1) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Application for variation of authority period
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GU(1) Application to nominated Tribunal member

15GU(2) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: No application can be made for a variation extending the period of effect beyond 24 months.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on extending the period of effect beyond 24 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15GU(3) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Application method for variation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application method for variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Part of a class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass

15GU(4) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Prohibition on making multiple urgent variation applications without formal variation application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the next application must be a formal variation application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on multiple urgent variation applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4) More than one application for a variation under this section may be made...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GU(4) Application to nominated Tribunal member

15GU(5) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
description: Details of earlier urgent variation application
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Application for variation must state earlier urgent variation application details
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state earlier urgent variation application details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GU(5) Application to nominated Tribunal member

15GV Determination of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GV(1) Determination of application
has part: 15GV(2) Determination of application
has part: 15GV(3) Determination of application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv
schema version: 2

15GV(1) Determination of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Tribunal member may vary formal authority subject to conditions or refuse application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GV Determination of application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary authority
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GV(1) Determination of application

15GV(2) Determination of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Grant variation only under specified conditions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GV Determination of application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must occur before the suspected criminal activity begins
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation can only be granted before suspected criminal activity begins
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: ...that a serious Commonwealth offence or a serious State offence that has a federal aspect...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal member must satisfy conditions before granting variation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Tribunal member must ensure the maximum extent of illicit goods control
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal member must ensure maximum extent of illicit goods control
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: ...that the operation will be conducted in a way that ensures...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Tribunal member must ensure reporting requirements are complied with
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal member must ensure reporting requirements are complied with
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: ...that the proposed controlled conduct will be capable of being accounted for...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must occur before the unlawful conduct begins
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Variation can only be granted if conditions are met
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: ...that any unlawful conduct involved in conducting the controlled operation...

15GV(3) Determination of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GV Determination of application

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

15GW Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Nominated Tribunal member may vary formal authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gw-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gw
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary formal authority
modality: Deontic
operator: May

15GX Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
has part: 15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gx
schema version: 2

15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Formal authority variation requirements
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: State period of extension
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (f) state the period of the extension.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specific information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A variation of a formal authority by a nominated Tribunal member...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority

15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Extension period must not exceed 24 months or specified time frames
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension period must not exceed 24 months or specified time frames
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

15GY Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy
schema version: 2

15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Cancel the authority to conduct a controlled operation at any time and for any reason.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the authority to conduct a controlled operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibits the authority to conduct a controlled operation.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities

15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Principal law enforcement officer may request cancellation of authority.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities

15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Cancellation of authority takes effect at specified time.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities

15GZ Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz
schema version: 2

15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Authorises law enforcement participants to engage in controlled conduct.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities

15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Person authorized to engage in controlled conduct for the period of effect of the authority.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person has obligation to engage in controlled conduct for the specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person has obligation to engage in controlled conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority, unless: (a) the authority specifies a shorter period during which the person is so authorised; or (b) the authority is varied to provide that the person is no longer so authorised; or (c) the authority is cancelled before the end of that period.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities

15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Authority cannot delegate controlled conduct to others.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: cannot be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (3) The authority to engage in controlled conduct given to a participant

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities

15H Defect in authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: An application for an authority or variation of an authority is not invalidated by any defect, other than a defect that affects the application, authority or variation in a material part.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15h
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15H Defect in authority

15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
has part: 15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ha
schema version: 2

15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Participant in controlled operation must comply with Commonwealth/State law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (a) and (b)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Participant must comply with authority to conduct controlled operation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant must comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (a) the participant engages in the conduct in accordance with the authority to conduct the controlled operation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant is authorized.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant is authorized to engage in controlled conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (b) the participant is identified in the authority as a person authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant must not induce.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant must not induce a Commonwealth offence or an offence under a law of a State or Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (c) the conduct does not involve the participant intentionally inducing a person to commit a Commonwealth offence or an offence under a law of a State or Territory that the person would not otherwise have intended to commit;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant must not engage.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant must not engage in conduct likely to cause death or serious injury.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (d) the conduct does not involve the participant engaging in any conduct that is likely to: (i) cause the death of, or serious injury to, any person; or (ii) involve the commission of a sexual offence against any person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant must act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant must act in accordance with law enforcement officer instructions.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (e) if the participant is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: The Commonwealth must indemnify a participant in a controlled operation against any civil liability.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hb
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify a participant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability

15HC Effect of sections 15HA and 15HB on other laws relating to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hc
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During criminal investigation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd
schema version: 2

15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Continue to apply despite variation in authority scope
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as the participant:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Variation in authority scope does not affect obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this Part continues...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues to apply despite variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: (1) If an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as the participant:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Continue if unaware of variation
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this Part continues...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continues to apply despite variation in temporal scope
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Continuity
premise text: (1) If an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Continue to apply despite cancellation of authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Counter cancellation of authority
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (a) is unaware of the cancellation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this Part continues...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continue to apply despite cancellation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (2) If an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Continue if unaware of cancellation
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
premise text: (a) is unaware of the cancellation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continue despite cancellation
modality: LTL
operator: Continuation
premise text: (2) If an authority to conduct a controlled operation is cancelled...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Be aware of substantial risk that authority has not been varied or cancelled.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be aware of risk
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of risk is required
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HE(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he
schema version: 2

15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Belief of innocence from ancillary conduct excused criminal responsibility
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal responsibility
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between belief and ancillary conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Belief in innocence

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal responsibility
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Belief of innocence from ancillary conduct excused criminal responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: Excusal
premise text: Belief in innocence

15HE(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Definition of ancillary offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines ancillary offence
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HE(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
has part: 15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hf
schema version: 2

15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Compensation for property loss or serious damage
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Liability for compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage

15HG Notification requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Notification requirements for loss of or damage to property and personal injury during controlled operations.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hg
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for notification.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents the obligation as a knowledge representation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to notify in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to notify.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for notification.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HG Notification requirements

15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh
schema version: 2

15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Participant in a Commonwealth operation must comply with the law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between participant engagement and operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (b) engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) This section applies to a participant in an operation authorised under a corresponding State controlled operations law if:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Participant must act in accordance with instructions of law enforcement officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant's actions overlap with the law enforcement officer's instructions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Participant's actions overlap with law enforcement officer's instructions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant's actions imply compliance with the instructions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Participant's actions imply compliance with instructions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant must act in accordance with the instructions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to act in accordance with instructions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant's actions diffuse to other participants.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Participant's actions diffuse to other participants.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Same meanings as in corresponding State controlled operations law
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

15HI Effect of section 15HH on other laws relating to criminal
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Section 15HH does not apply to certain laws relating to criminal investigation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hi
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not applicable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluded from section 15HH
modality: Deontic
operator: Excluded By
premise text: Section 15HH

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HI Effect of section 15HH on other laws relating to criminal

15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HJ(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj
schema version: 2

15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Belief of authorized conduct protects against ancillary offense
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth, the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible for the ancillary offence if, at the time the person engaged in the ancillary conduct, he or she believed the related conduct was being engaged in, or would be engaged in, by a participant in an operation authorised under a corresponding State controlled operations law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Belief of authorized conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Believes
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth, the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible for the ancillary offence if, at the time the person engaged in the ancillary conduct, he or she believed the related conduct was being engaged in, or would be engaged in, by a participant in an operation authorised under a corresponding State controlled operations law.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HJ(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Same meanings as in corresponding State controlled operations law
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(2) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(3) Unauthorised disclosure of information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk
schema version: 2

15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosing controlled operation information is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of controlled operation information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information

15HK(2) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HK(2) Unauthorised disclosure of information

15HK(3) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosure of information to Ombudsman or Integrity Commissioner is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure permitted
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted for disclosure under specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: discloser informs the person to whom the disclosure is made of the discloser’s identity before making the disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Good faith justification provided
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification for permissible disclosure under specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
premise text: discloser makes the disclosure in good faith

15HL Unauthorised disclosure of information—endangering safety,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Unauthorised disclosure of information—endangering safety
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hl
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information endangering safety
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosing information relating to a controlled operation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HL Unauthorised disclosure of information—endangering safety,

15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.97
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
has part: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hm
schema version: 2

15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Chief officers must submit reports to the Ombudsman.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and

15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Report must include specific details about formal authorities and applications.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Report must include specific details.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and

15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(4) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(5) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(6) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(7) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn
schema version: 2

15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Chief officers must submit annual reports to the Minister and Ombudsman.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide annual reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Chief officers must advise the Minister of information to be excluded from reports.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must provide information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officers must advise the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: chief officer has a duty to advise the Minister.

15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Minister must exclude information from report on chief officer's advice.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must exclude information from report.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to exclude information from report.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Chief officer advises Minister to exclude information.

15HN(4) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Report cannot disclose information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Report must not disclose information

15HN(5) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Annual reports must include particulars of a controlled operation when completed.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HN(5) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

15HN(6) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Must send copy of report to State or Territory Minister with responsibility for corresponding law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to send copy of report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15HN(7) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Must provide report to Ombudsman at the same time as Minister.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report to Ombudsman.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HN(7) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman

15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.101
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ho
schema version: 2

15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.101
note: The Ombudsman must prepare and provide reports to the Minister and ACC.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman

15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.101
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must not include sensitive information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on reporting sensitive information
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) A report under this section...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman

15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: The chief officer of an authorising agency must keep certain documents.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hp
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The chief officer of an authorising agency must keep certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations

15HQ General register
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.103
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HQ(1) General register
has part: 15HQ(2) General register
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hq
schema version: 2

15HQ(1) General register
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: Chief officer must cause a general register to be kept.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HQ General register

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HQ(1) General register

15HQ(2) General register
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: Specify general register details for applications and authorities.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HQ General register

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specify date range for applications and authorities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (i) the date of the application; and (ii) whether the application was formal or urgent;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The general register is to specify:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify authority details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (ii) whether the authority was formal or urgent; and (iii) the name and rank or position of the person who granted the authority;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify authority details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (iv) each serious Commonwealth offence or serious State offence that has a federal aspect in respect of which controlled conduct under the authority was to be engaged in;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specify authority details with recursive relation
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (b) for each authority under this Part granted by an authorising officer of the agency:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HQ(2) General register

15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
has part: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hr
schema version: 2

15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: The Ombudsman may appoint members of the Ombudsman’s staff to be inspecting officers.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers

15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Appointment under subsection (1) must be in writing.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide written appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers

15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(2) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(4) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(5) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs
schema version: 2

15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of authorising agencies at least once every 12 months.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

15HS(2) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of the ACC every 12 months.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HS(2) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to request staff information
modality: Deontic
operator: may require

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

15HS(4) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Chief officer must assist Ombudsman with records inspection.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15HS(5) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: No obligation to inspect records not completed at the time of inspection.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Incomplete records and inspection are disjoint temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No cognitive processing required for incomplete records and inspection.
modality: CogAI
operator: none
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding incomplete records from inspection.
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion from incomplete records to inspection.
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: No trace between incomplete records and inspection.
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HS(5) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

15HT Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht
schema version: 2

15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Ombudsman can compel law enforcement officer to provide relevant information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: The Ombudsman may require law enforcement officers to provide information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time period is between the specified place and the deadline.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time period for providing information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman at a specified place and within a specified period.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence system is applied to process the information from the law enforcement officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers must provide information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Ombudsman may require law enforcement officers to provide information.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information is disseminated from the law enforcement officer to the Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information dissemination
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time interval is between the specified place and the deadline.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Time interval for providing information
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman at a specified place and within a specified period.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: The Ombudsman may require a law enforcement officer to attend an inspection.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman may require the officer to attend.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: The Ombudsman may require a chief officer to attend an inspection.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Chief officer must attend within a specified period or time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (e) within a specified period or at a specified time on a specified day;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Chief officer must answer questions relevant to the inspection
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (c) before a specified inspecting officer; and ... (d) at a specified place;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Chief officer has authority to attend inspection
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (a) has reasonable grounds to believe that a law enforcement officer of a particular law enforcement agency is able to give information relevant to an inspection.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Ombudsman may require chief officer to attend inspection
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (b) does not know the officer’s identity;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Requirement for reasonable time and day in information requests
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information

15HU Offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Refusal to attend before an inspecting officer is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hu
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to attend
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 15HT requires attendance

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HU Offence

15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HV(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(5) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(6) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv
schema version: 2

15HV(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Must provide information despite other laws or public interest concerns.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HV(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

15HV(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Ombudsman must provide information and access despite other circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HV(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

15HV(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Agency must provide information and access to inspecting officer for inspection purposes.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency permits inspecting officer access to records.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

15HV(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
description: Information
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Agency officer must provide information to a person despite other laws.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency officer must provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HV(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

15HV(5) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Ombudsman must be given information and access despite other provisions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HV(5) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

15HV(6) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Ombudsman must be given prescribed authority information and access.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HV(6) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.109
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hw
schema version: 2

15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Definition of State or Territory agency and inspecting authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of State or Territory agency and inspecting authority
modality: Deontic
operator: has part

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Ombudsman must provide information about State or Territory agency
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hx
schema version: 2

15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Delegation of powers to APS employee
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman

15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman

15HY Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Ombudsman not liable to action for acts done in good faith
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hy
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman's actions are not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Ombudsman's actions overlap with those of other officers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Ombudsman's actions infer non-liability
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman's actions are not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation diffuses to other officers
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Obligation applies to all inspecting officers
modality: LinearLogic
operator: All
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HY Ombudsman not to be sued

15HZ Evidence of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: A document purporting to be an authority granted under section 15GI is admissible in any legal proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hz
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to admit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admission of documents as evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
premise text: Section 15GI

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HZ Evidence of authorities

15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15J(1) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
has part: 15J(2) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
has part: 15J(3) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j
schema version: 2

15J(1) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Authority granted to Customs if illicit goods involved in operation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authority exists before operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(1) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain

15J(2) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Notify Chief Executive Officer of Customs of certain information after authority is granted.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(2) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain

15J(3) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Failure to comply does not affect authority validity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(3) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain

15K Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Definitions for Schedule 3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15k
schema version: 2

15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(5) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka
schema version: 2

15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Law enforcement officer may apply for authority to acquire or use assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to do something
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer of the law enforcement agency contains the applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer of the law enforcement agency must be informed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: None

15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority is granted during the application period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation applied
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the application is made, then the authority must be granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference applied
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence system recognizes the application as valid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence applied
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer of the agency must grant the requested authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority granted
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information about the application spreads to all relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information spread applied
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Separate application required for each assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Separate application is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KA(5) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity must be in writing and contain specific information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is mandatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(5) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KB Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KB(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(2) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(3) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(4) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(5) Determination of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb
schema version: 2

15KB(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Chief officer may grant authority to acquire or use assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (1) After considering an application...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KB(1) Determination of applications

15KB(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity may not be granted unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on granting authority to acquire or use assumed identity
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Chief officer must be satisfied on reasonable grounds

15KB(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Supervise acquisition or use of assumed identity by authorised civilian.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for supervision starts at the appointment by the chief officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for supervision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The supervision relation implies an appointment by the chief officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Supervision implies appointment
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The supervision relation is a cognitive action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Supervision as a cognitive action
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must appoint...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to supervise
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The supervision relation is a diffusion relation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Supervision as a diffusion relation
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
premise text: ...an officer of the law enforcement agency or the intelligence agency...

15KB(4) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: The officer appointed as supervisor must meet certain qualifications.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the rank of sergeant or an equivalent or higher rank.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The qualifications must be met during the appointment as supervisor.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the position, or performs the duties, of a Customs Level 4 officer, or an equivalent or higher position, in Customs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The qualifications imply that the officer must meet certain criteria.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the position, or performs the duties, of a Customs Level 4 officer, or an equivalent or higher position, in Customs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The qualifications must be met by all officers appointed as supervisor.
modality: CogAI
operator: Must
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the rank of sergeant or an equivalent or higher rank.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The officer must meet the specified qualifications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the rank of sergeant or an equivalent or higher rank.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The qualifications must be met by all officers appointed as supervisor.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Must
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KB(4) Determination of applications

15KB(5) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Authorise applications for assumed identities in foreign countries
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to authority
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

15KC Form of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KC(1) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(2) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(3) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(4) Form of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc
schema version: 2

15KC(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Authority must be in writing and signed by the person granting it.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KC Form of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authority starts on a certain date
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS ON A CERTAIN DATE
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must be in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE IN WRITING
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must be signed by the person granting it
modality: Deontic
operator: SIGNED BY THE PERSON GRANTING IT
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority is for a specific purpose
modality: Deontic
operator: IS FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Authority is recurring
modality: LTL
operator: IS RECURRING
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KC(1) Form of authority

15KC(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
description: Details of assumed identity, evidence, conditions, and officer names
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Authority must state certain details
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KC Form of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must state details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KC(2) Form of authority

15KC(3) Form of authority
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Must state issuing agencies and conditions for assumed identity use.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KC Form of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state issuing agencies and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KC(3) Form of authority

15KC(4) Form of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Grant of further authorities in relation to an authorised civilian is permitted.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KC Form of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant of further authorities in relation to an authorised civilian is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

15KD Period of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KD(1) Period of authority
has part: 15KD(2) Period of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kd
schema version: 2

15KD(1) Period of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: Authority remains in force until cancelled under section 15KE.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KD Period of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KD(1) Period of authority

15KD(2) Period of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: Authority remains in force until specified end date
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KD Period of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority remains in force until the end of the period specified...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds authority
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (2) An authority for an authorised civilian...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KD(2) Period of authority

15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: Chief officer may vary or cancel authority at any time.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ke
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary or cancel authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority

15KF Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf
schema version: 2

15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Agency must review authority periodically.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to review authority
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority

15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Review authority yearly
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for review
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) in the case of an authority granted by the chief officer or a delegate of the chief officer of an intelligence agency to an authorised intelligence officer—at least once every 3 years;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conduct review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A review of an authority under this section is to be conducted:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring review
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (b) in all other cases—at least once every 12 months.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority

15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Determine whether use of assumed identity is still necessary
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority

15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Cancel authority if necessary
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she must cancel the authority under section 15KE.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory cancellation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) If the chief officer is satisfied...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority

15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Chief officer must record opinion and reasons for using assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must record opinion and reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority

15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate an authority.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(6) Yearly review of authority

15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Permits law enforcement agencies and intelligence agencies to apply for an order to make entries in registers of births, deaths or marriages.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-cogai-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-shacl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kg
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for an order that an entry be made in a register of births, deaths or marriages under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: The chief officer of...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes entities involved
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
premise text: The chief officer of...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for an order that an entry be made in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The chief officer of...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Matches triple patterns
modality: N3Logic
operator: Triple pattern matching
premise text: The chief officer of...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates schema compliance
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
premise text: The chief officer of...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages

15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Register of births, deaths or marriages must be updated upon authority ceasing to be in force.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kh
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty on the state to update registers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,

15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki
schema version: 2

15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Authority must provide evidence of assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must produce evidence of assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must state a reasonable period for compliance.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request must state a reasonable period for compliance.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must include specific details.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity cannot be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which making a request for evidence of assumed identity is prohibited under this section.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Uses cognitive AI to prohibit making a request for evidence of assumed identity under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
modality: CogAI
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for evidence of assumed identity under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition on making a request for evidence of assumed identity under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which making a request for evidence of assumed identity is prohibited under this section.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.

15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Definition of evidence for assumed identity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KJ Government issuing agencies to comply with request
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Government agency must comply with request within a reasonable period.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kj
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KJ Government issuing agencies to comply with request

15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Non-government issuing agencies must comply with requests.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kk
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply with request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request under section 15KI

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request

15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KL(1) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KL(2) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kl
schema version: 2

15KL(1) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Chief officer must cancel evidence of assumed identity upon written direction.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KL(1) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity

15KL(2) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Delete or alter an entry in a record of information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity

15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km
schema version: 2

15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity ceases.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority ceases at time of cessation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Ceasing authority at time of cessation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: cease
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation ceases
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceasing authority
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority ceases at specific point
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceasing authority at specific point
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority ceases at time of cessation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceasing authority at time of cessation
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority ceases over time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ceasing authority over time
modality: LTL
operator: cease
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity

15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Request to return evidence of assumed identity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity

15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Failure to comply with a request for identity information is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) a request has been made to the person under subsection (2); and (b) the person fails to comply with the request.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 10 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with a request
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (b) the person fails to comply with the request.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity

15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL exempts officers from criminal liability.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kn
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action overlaps with request/direction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL overlaps with the time period of an action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inferrable from other knowledge
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL is inferred from other knowledge.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal liability
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request or direction under section 15KI/15KL exempts officers from criminal liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Propagated to other agents
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL propagates to other agents.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recurring trace
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL is a recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies

15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ko
schema version: 2

15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide indemnity
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Commonwealth must indemnify issuing agency or officer for liability incurred in course of duty.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency or officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kp
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This interval overlaps with the time period during which the person can acquire or use an assumed identity under these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The excerpt describes a temporal interval during which the acquisition or use of an assumed identity is permitted.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This process recognises the authority of the civilian's supervisor under these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The excerpt describes a cognitive process related to acquiring or using an assumed identity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: The person is an authorised civilian and the acquisition or use:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is permitted for the person to acquire or use an assumed identity under these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to acquire or use an assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is in accordance with an authority; and

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This pattern repeats for the person who can acquire or use an assumed identity under these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The excerpt describes a recurring pattern of permitted acquisition or use of an assumed identity.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This schema validates the authority of the civilian's supervisor under these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: The excerpt describes a schema that validates the acquisition or use of an assumed identity.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
premise text: The person is an authorised civilian and the acquisition or use:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used

15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Protection from criminal liability for authorised persons performing their duties.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kq
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's duty overlaps with the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap of duties and offences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: ...in the case of an authorised intelligence officer, an authorised law enforcement officer or an authorised foreign officer—in the course of his or her duty...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's assumed identity implies their criminal liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of assumed identity on criminal liability
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: ...the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognises the person's obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of artificial agents' obligations
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: ...the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has an obligation to perform their duty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person is not criminally responsible for the offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation diffuses to the person performing their duty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations and responsibilities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: ...the thing is done: (i) in the case of an authorised intelligence officer, an authorised law enforcement officer or an authorised foreign officer—in the course of his or her duty...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons

15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Protection from criminal liability for third parties performing official duties.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kr
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to protect third parties performing official duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties

15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
has part: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ks
schema version: 2

15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Authority granted by chief officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer has authority to grant
modality: Deontic
operator: has

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons

15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Commonwealth must indemnify authorised persons for liabilities incurred due to their actions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth owes an obligation to indemnify authorised persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons

15KT Particular qualifications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications
has part: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kt
schema version: 2

15KT(1) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: No sections apply if a particular qualification is needed and the person does not have it.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications

15KT(2) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Prohibits flying a plane if not qualified.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The officer's flying privileges are suspended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Flying is restricted to qualified individuals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The officer is not qualified to fly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Acquiring a pilot's licence under an assumed identity does not qualify the individual.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The officer's flying privileges are nullified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Flying without qualification is an invalid action.
modality: CogAI
operator: isInvalid
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The officer is not authorised to fly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits flying a plane.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The officer's flying privileges are revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Flying without qualification is not permitted.
modality: Diffusion
operator: differsFrom
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications

15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku
schema version: 2

15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Continue to apply despite variation in authority scope
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Counter rebuttal that continuation applies despite variation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continue application despite variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Continue application despite lack of knowledge of variation
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
modality: LTL
operator: Continuation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Authority must inform authorised person of cancellation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority must inform.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has an obligation to inform.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Authority exists.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorised person knows about cancellation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Authorised person must know about cancellation.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
premise text: Authorised person is unaware of cancellation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Reckless disregard for variation or cancellation of authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship analysis for recklessness
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inferential reasoning for recklessness
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disregarding risk due to unjustifiable assumption of authority stability
modality: Deontic
operator: recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of risk implies recklessness
modality: Epistemic
operator: awareness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval analysis for recklessness
modality: LTL
operator: interval
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15KV Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv
schema version: 2

15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Chief officer of an intelligence agency may agree to transfer control of an authority.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May agree
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities

15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Chief officer may agree to transfer control of authority.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Transfer is conditional on temporal relation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Authority is recognized as an entity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer of control is conditional on agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Transfer is related to cross-referencing.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Cross-reference
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Transfer is recurring.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities

15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Chief officer of originating agency must provide written document to chief officer of receiving agency.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Review of authority must be conducted within a certain timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) whether control of the authority has previously been transferred under this section, and if so:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written document to chief officer of receiving agency
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give the chief officer of the receiving agency a written document setting out:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities

15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw
schema version: 2

15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Authority continues to be in force after transfer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must continue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain authority
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (2) The authority continues...

15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions after transfer of control
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Chief officer of the receiving agency must review authority within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Review must occur within specified timeframe after last review or grant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The chief officer of the receiving agency must review the authority.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The review must be taken by the chief officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Review is a cognitive action for the chief officer to take.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The authority has been transferred under subsection 15KV(1) or 15KV(2).

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide review within specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer of the receiving agency must review authority.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The review must be taken by the chief officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Review is a necessary action for the chief officer to take.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The authority has been transferred under subsection 15KV(1) or 15KV(2).

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Review must occur within specified timeframe after last review or grant.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: The chief officer of the receiving agency must review the authority.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Effect of section 15KL on transfer of control
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kx
schema version: 2

15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Authority to request evidence from participating jurisdiction
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity from issuing agency
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must provide evidence of assumed identity
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky
schema version: 2

15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Request made to chief officer, response within reasonable period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (c) the request states a reasonable period for compliance with the request

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for evidence of assumed identity
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Agency must comply with request for evidence within a reasonable period.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must comply with request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Exemptions from compliance with requests made under section (1)(b)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
has part: 15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kz
schema version: 2

15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Cancel evidence upon written direction from chief officer who authorised the request.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of cancelling evidence without written direction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence

15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Definition of cancel
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: cancel includes delete or alter an entry in a record of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15l
schema version: 2

15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity to chief officer of a requesting agency.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Agency must indemnify issuing agency and officers for liability incurred while complying with request.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency and officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
has part: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15la
schema version: 2

15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15la-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15la-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

15LB Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
has part: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lb
schema version: 2

15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority or in the course of duty is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the acquisition or use is not both: (i) in accordance with an authority; and (ii) in the course of duty;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (c) the acquisition or use is not both: (i) in accordance with an authority; and (ii) in the course of duty;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person must be an authorised person to acquire or use an assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person must be reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority or in the course of duty is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The penalty for this offence is imprisonment for 2 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity

15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation applies to all times after the commencement of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the obligation applies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorised civilians must acquire or use assumed identities in accordance with authority and supervisor directions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on authorised civilians to acquire or use assumed identities in accordance with authority and supervisor directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorised civilians must not be reckless about assumed identities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless behaviour by authorised civilians regarding assumed identities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Supervisors must provide authority and directions for authorised civilians regarding assumed identities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the supervisor to provide authority and directions for authorised civilians regarding assumed identities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity

15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc
schema version: 2

15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal, that another person has acquired, will acquire, is using or has used an assumed identity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115 Amendments relating to controlled operations, assumed identities and witness identity protection Schedule 3 Main amendments Part 1 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010

15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity

15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited unless specified conditions are met. Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the prohibition as a rule of law.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) if the person causes the disclosure of information mentioned in paragraph (1)(c), (2)(c) or (3)(c)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to all agents.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity

15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: No offence under subsections (1), (2) or (3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity

15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld
schema version: 2

15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Submit report to Minister with specific information about authorities and assumed identities.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must submit report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Report subject to Minister
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Exclusion of information from report to prevent endangering safety or compromising law enforcement activities.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relationship established.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals of exclusion and report preparation overlap.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Exclusion must occur before the report is laid before Parliament.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exclusion is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Information should not be made public.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
description: Copy of report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Must exclude information from report if advised by chief officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Chief officer of an intelligence agency must submit a report to the Inspector-General.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15le
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must submit a report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Report includes specific information about authorities and activities.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—

15LF Record keeping
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LF(1) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(2) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(3) Record keeping
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf
schema version: 2

15LF(1) Record keeping
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Agency must keep records about operation of Part.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LF Record keeping

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to keep records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LF(1) Record keeping

15LF(2) Record keeping
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Records must be kept of authority grants, variations, and cancellations.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LF Record keeping

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LF(2) Record keeping

15LF(3) Record keeping
type: Concept
description: (a) names of chief officers, (b) names of agencies, (c) date of transfer, and (d) dates and names of previous transfers if applicable
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Records must be kept for authorities transferred to or from the chief officer of an agency.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LF Record keeping

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) date of transfer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for record keeping
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) names of chief officers, (b) names of agencies, (c) date of transfer, and (d) dates and names of previous transfers if applicable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LF(3) Record keeping

15LG Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LG(1) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(2) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(3) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(4) Audit of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg
schema version: 2

15LG(1) Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: Chief officer must audit records every 6 months.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LG Audit of records

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Records must be audited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer must cause records to be audited.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LG(1) Audit of records

15LG(2) Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: The audit must be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LG Audit of records

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The audit is conducted within a certain temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for conducting the audit.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Appointing a person implies conducting the audit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Conducting the audit implies appointing a person.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The audit must be conducted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The audit must be conducted.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person appointed by the chief officer conducts the audit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: BY
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer is responsible for auditing records.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of responsibility for auditing records.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LG(2) Audit of records

15LG(3) Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: The person conducting the audit must not be a certain type of person.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LG Audit of records

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a certain type of person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The person conducting the audit must not be...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a certain type of person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: The person conducting the audit must not be...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LG(3) Audit of records

15LG(4) Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: Audit results must be reported to the chief officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15LG Audit of records

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to report audit results
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LG(4) Audit of records

15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
has part: 15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lh
schema version: 2

15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: Functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Delegation is excluded from the scope of this section during its effective period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Delegation is not diffused from the scope of this section
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not Diffused
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Delegation is excluded from the scope of this section until it is revoked or superseded
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions

15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: Delegation of chief officer's functions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions

15M Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Definitions for Schedule 3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15m-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15m
schema version: 2

15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.143
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
has part: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ma
schema version: 2

15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Defines criminal proceeding
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of criminal proceeding
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has temporal relation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a definition
modality: Argumentation
operator: is defined as

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: criminal proceeding
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes the meaning of criminal proceeding
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is defined as

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the timing of criminal proceeding
modality: Diffusion
operator: has temporal relation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the timing of criminal proceeding
modality: LTL
operator: has temporal relation

15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Defines what constitutes a criminal proceeding.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a criminal proceeding:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies components of a criminal proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: is part of
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a criminal proceeding:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding

15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
has part: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mb
schema version: 2

15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Defines civil proceeding for the purpose of this Part.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding has a specific meaning.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding means...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to duties and prohibitions.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to diffusion of information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to ordered or recurring traces.
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding

15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Defines what constitutes a civil proceeding.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines when a civil proceeding begins and ends.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a civil proceeding:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes various types of proceedings in the definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a civil proceeding:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding

15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: A charge against a person for an offence is outstanding until it is finally dealt with in one of the following ways.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mc
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Charge can be pending until it is finally dealt with.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (i) the person has been arrested for the offence, unless the person has been later released without being charged with an offence;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for charges against a person for an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (a) a charge against a person for an offence is outstanding until the charge is finally dealt with in any of the following ways:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for allegations of professional misconduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (c) an allegation of professional misconduct against a person is outstanding if the allegation has not been finally dealt with in accordance with the procedures that apply for the purposes of dealing with an allegation of that kind.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for charges against a person for an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (iii) the person is discharged by a court following a committal hearing;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Charge can be pending until it is finally dealt with.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (ii) a summons to appear before a court to answer a charge for the offence has been served on the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending

15MD Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MD(1) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(2) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(3) Application of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md
schema version: 2

15MD(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: This Part applies to a proceeding in which an operative is, or may be, required to give evidence obtained as an operative.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MD Application of Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to a proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MD(1) Application of Part

15MD(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Protection of evidence in proceedings is unaffected by this Part.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MD Application of Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect evidence in proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MD(2) Application of Part

15MD(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Court control over proceedings is not limited by this Part.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MD Application of Part

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court control over proceedings is not limited by this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MD(3) Application of Part

15ME Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Chief officer may give witness identity protection certificate.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15me
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

15MF Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MF(1) Statutory declaration by operative
has part: 15MF(2) Statutory declaration by operative
has part: 15MF(3) Statutory declaration by operative
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf
schema version: 2

15MF(1) Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
description: particulars of each offence, charge, finding, allegation, comment, representation
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: Statutory declaration by operative regarding convictions, charges, and credibility
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MF Statutory declaration by operative

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Statutory declaration is mandatory
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15MF(2) Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: No disclosure of statutory declaration made under this section in any proceeding.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MF Statutory declaration by operative

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in any proceeding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (3), a person cannot be compelled to disclose...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MF(2) Statutory declaration by operative

15MF(3) Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MF Statutory declaration by operative

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Statutory declaration exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not apply to:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MF(3) Statutory declaration by operative

15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mg
schema version: 2

15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Witness identity protection certificate requirements
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide witness information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate

15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: A witness identity protection certificate for an operative must not contain information that may allow the operative’s identity, or where the operative lives, to be revealed.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate

15MH Filing and notification
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MH(1) Filing and notification
has part: 15MH(2) Filing and notification
has part: 15MH(3) Filing and notification
has part: 15MH(4) Filing and notification
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh
schema version: 2

15MH(1) Filing and notification
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MH Filing and notification

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MH(1) Filing and notification

15MH(2) Filing and notification
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Provide a copy of the certificate to each party at least 14 days before evidence is given.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MH Filing and notification

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the certificate to each party.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: The person who files the certificate must know about the requirement.
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATORY KNOWLEDGE

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The obligation is continuously present.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUOUSLY

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MH(2) Filing and notification

15MH(3) Filing and notification
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: The court may order the person filing the certificate to give a copy of it to a person stated in the order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MH Filing and notification

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MH(3) Filing and notification

15MH(4) Filing and notification
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Conditional application of section 15MH(4)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15MH Filing and notification

15MI Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
has part: 15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mi
schema version: 2

15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Request for leave to not comply with a requirement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance

15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply with the requirement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Non-compliance overlaps with situations where leave cannot be given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Non-compliance is recognized as a situation where leave cannot be given.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave must be refused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Non-compliance diffuses into situations where leave cannot be given.
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffusesInto
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Non-compliance is a recurring trace of situations where leave cannot be given.
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.

15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mj
schema version: 2

15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Witness identity protection certificate applies in court proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal applicability of section
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
premise text: Section applies if a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of witness identity protection certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: Section applies if a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate

15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Witness identity protection: questions about operative's identity or residence must not be asked.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of questioning witness about identity or residence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate

15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(7) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk
schema version: 2

15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Court may make order to protect witness identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Court must make order suppressing publication of certain information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Publication suppression
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suppress publication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court order

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Court may make order for how transcript is to be dealt with, including suppressing its publication.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make order for transcript handling
modality: Deontic
operator: May

15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an order is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conduct overlaps with prohibited conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conduct is recognized as prohibited by AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct contravenes the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6) A person commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conduct diffuses to prohibited conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conduct is a recurring trace of prohibited conduct
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15MK(7) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited by subsection (6)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The two intervals overlap
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt overlaps with subsection (6)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The two intervals recognize each other
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Subsection (6) recognizes court's power to punish for contempt
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court can still punish for contempt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The two intervals diffuse
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt diffuses with subsection (6)
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The two intervals repeat
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt repeats with subsection (6)
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(7) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml
schema version: 2

15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity to presiding officer if certificate filed.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose operative's identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: The operative must disclose their true identity to the presiding officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The operative must disclose their true identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Presiding officer must not record or retain information disclosed under subsection (2).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of recording information
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mm
schema version: 2

15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity despite certificate
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Request for leave to ask a question or require a witness to make a statement that may disclose the operative's identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
has part: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mn
schema version: 2

15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Application for leave—joinder as respondent
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent

15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Allow person to join application as respondent under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The court...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent

15MO Directions to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MO(1) Directions to jury
has part: 15MO(2) Directions to jury
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mo
schema version: 2

15MO(1) Directions to jury
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Witness must provide identity protection certificate if operative gives evidence in jury proceeding.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MO Directions to jury

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The identity protection certificate must be provided between the time the operative gives evidence and the end of the proceeding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing identity protection certificate
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operative is someone who gives evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies operative as someone who gives evidence
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The witness must provide the identity protection certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the conditions are met, the witness must provide the identity protection certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional provision
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The identity protection certificate must be provided between the time the operative gives evidence and the end of the proceeding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing identity protection certificate
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MO(1) Directions to jury

15MO(2) Directions to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Court must not draw adverse inferences against defendant or another party due to witness identity protection certificate or court order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MO Directions to jury

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No adverse inferences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Witness identity protection certificate or court order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No adverse inferences against defendant or another party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences against defendant or another party.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Witness identity protection certificate for the operative.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No adverse inferences due to court order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences due to court order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court's power to direct jury unaffected.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Court's power to direct jury is not affected by witness identity protection certificate.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: NotA
premise text: Section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).

15MP Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MP(1) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(2) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(3) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(4) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(5) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(6) Appeals and adjournments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp
schema version: 2

15MP(1) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Court must give or refuse leave for witness identity protection certificate.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must give or refuse leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MP(1) Appeals and adjournments

15MP(2) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals against decisions on leave or orders.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MP(2) Appeals and adjournments

15MP(3) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Appeal against decision to give or refuse leave, or to make or refuse to make order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A party can appeal against the decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appeal is allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: can appeal
premise text: State has the power to give or refuse leave.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MP(3) Appeals and adjournments

15MP(4) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Allow operative or chief officer to join appeal if they have a sufficient interest in the decision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow operative or chief officer to join appeal if they have a sufficient interest in the decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MP(4) Appeals and adjournments

15MP(5) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Party may apply for adjournment to appeal against original court's decision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MP(5) Appeals and adjournments

15MP(6) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Original court must grant adjournment if application is made under subsection (5)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Original court must grant adjournment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide adjournment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Application is made under subsection (5)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MP(6) Appeals and adjournments

15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq
schema version: 2

15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Chief officer must cancel witness identity protection certificate.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate contains the application of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between cancellation and application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate is contained within the artificial intelligence application of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must cancel the witness identity protection certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide cancellation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate is contained within the diffusion of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of cancellation information
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate is contained within the application of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between cancellation and application
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Cancellation of witness identity protection certificate
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Chief officer must give notice to court and parties if certificate is cancelled.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer must give notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr
schema version: 2

15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Permission to give information disclosing operative's identity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Chief officer may permit person to give information disclosing operative's identity.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

15MS Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms
schema version: 2

15MS(1) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Disclosing operative identity without authorization is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person engages in conduct; and...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and cancellation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing operative identity without authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding has been given; and (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to cancel certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None of the following applies:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for disclosure without authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (i) the conduct is required by section 15ML;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None of the following applies:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure offences.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (d) the conduct results in the disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences

15MS(2) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Disclosure of operative's identity or where the operative lives is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) the conduct results in the disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity or where the operative lives.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (f) the person is reckless as to whether his or her conduct will endanger the health or safety of another person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct that endangers health or safety.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (f) the person is reckless as to whether his or her conduct will endanger the health or safety of another person.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (e) none of the following applies:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (e) none of the following applies:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences

15MS(3) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Disclosing operative identity or location without authorization is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences

15MT Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MT(1) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 15MT(2) Evidentiary certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mt
schema version: 2

15MT(1) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Chief officer must sign certificate stating certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MT Evidentiary certificates

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MT(1) Evidentiary certificates

15MT(2) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Certificate is prima facie evidence in proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MT Evidentiary certificates

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The certificate is prima facie evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assertion of a fact
modality: Deontic
operator: is

15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu
schema version: 2

15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Chief officer must submit report about witness identity protection certificates.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates

15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Report requirements for witness identity protection certificates
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates

15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Prohibition on disclosing witness identity protection certificate information
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal reporting restrictions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Reporting restrictions
modality: CogAI
operator: Restricts
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Reporting restrictions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restricts
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal reporting restrictions
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates

15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Minister must lay report before each House within 15 sitting days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates

15MW Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.159
note: Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under corresponding laws
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mw-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mw
schema version: 2

15MX Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MX(1) Delegation
has part: 15MX(2) Delegation
has part: 15MX(3) Delegation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx
schema version: 2

15MX(1) Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Delegation of functions is prohibited for chief officers under this Part.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MX Delegation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MX(1) Delegation

15MX(2) Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Delegation of functions to senior officers
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MX Delegation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty on chief officers
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MX(2) Delegation

15MX(3) Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Defines senior officer roles in various agencies.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MX Delegation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency-specific definitions
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for senior officers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has-subclass-of

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MX(3) Delegation

16 Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Defines commencement and State controlled operations law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

160 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: List of prohibited actions for criminal investigation powers
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-160
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No search of individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) searches of individuals;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No search or seizure of other property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) searches, inspections or seizures of other property;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No electronic surveillance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (f) electronic surveillance devices or telecommunications interception;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 160 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

162 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-162-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-162
schema version: 2

164 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-164-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-164
schema version: 2

17 Controlled operations authorised before commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations during that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 during the period of pre-commencement controlled operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The commencement of this item marks the beginning of a new period for which the Crimes Act 1914 does not apply.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914.
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: Repeals and amendments made by this Part do not affect the continued application of the Crimes Act 1914.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 as if repeals and amendments had not happened.
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: The repeal and amendment provisions do not affect the continued application of the Crimes Act 1914.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 as if repeals and amendments had not happened.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: Pre-commencement controlled operation is a subclass of the crimes covered by the Crimes Act 1914.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations during that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 during the period of pre-commencement controlled operation.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The commencement of this item marks the beginning of a new period for which the Crimes Act 1914 does not apply.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Controlled operations authorised before commencement

18 Controlled operations—continuation of Division 3 of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Continuation of Division 3 of Part IAB despite repeal
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues in effect as if not repealed
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Controlled operations—continuation of Division 3 of

19 Assumed identities—authorisations taken to be authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Assumed identities—authorisations taken to be authority
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Has effect after commencement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation of authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Authorisation was granted immediately before commencement

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Has effect as if authority granted under section 15KB
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional effect of authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Authorisation was granted under section 15XG

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Assumed identities—authorisations taken to be authority

2 Subsection 3(1) (definition of ACLEI authorising officer)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal the definition of ACLEI authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Assumed identities—continuation of old law in relation to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: States without corresponding laws: continuation of old law in relation to
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues the old law in relation to states without corresponding laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Assumed identities—continuation of old law in relation to

21 Section 219ZJA (definition of serious Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: Definition of serious Commonwealth offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'serious Commonwealth offence'
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Section 219ZJA (definition of serious Commonwealth

3 Subsection 3(1) (definition of AFP authorising officer)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal the definition of AFP authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of appropriate authorising
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal definition of appropriate authorising officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 3(1) (definition of authorising officer)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal the definition of authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

58 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-58
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 3(1) (definition of controlled operation)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal definition of controlled operation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Defines the meaning of 'authorising officer' and related terms.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-60
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes related terms in the definition of 'authorising officer'
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Defines terms related to controlled operations and serious offences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-62
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms with explicit definitions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: List of crimes prohibited by law
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-64
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Authorisation required for ACLEI staff to perform duties.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-66
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Staff member is authorised.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Staff member must be authorised.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Staff member is an SES employee.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 68(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-68
schema version: 2

68(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Authorising officer may require additional information from applicant.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-68-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: mayRequire

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

68(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Must provide written record of urgent application to authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-68-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written record of urgent application.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

7 Subsection 3(1) (definition of major controlled operation)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal definition of major controlled operation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Subsequent authority must be formal if granted in respect of a controlled operation with previous authority.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-70
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but in that case the subsequent authority must be a formal authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Subsequent authority overlaps with previous authority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part prevents an authority being granted...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the subsequent authority must be a formal authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Formal authority required for subsequent control of controlled operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: implying
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part prevents an authority being granted...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but not so as to extend its duration—see sections 15GO and 15GS.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Urgent authority can be varied, but not extended.
modality: Deontic
operator: implying
premise text: Note: An urgent authority can be varied...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but in that case the subsequent authority must be a formal authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Subsequent authority is both formal and overlaps with previous authority.
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part prevents an authority being granted...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-72
schema version: 2

72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: A person is sufficiently identified if they can be matched to their identity by the chief officer of the authorising agency.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-72-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the chief officer to match assumed names, code names, or code numbers with identities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Must not identify persons by identifying a class of persons.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-72-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not identify persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Class of persons must be identified separately
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class of persons is not a valid identifier
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type equality

74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 74(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 74(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-74
schema version: 2

74(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: No variation of formal authority can exceed 3 months in effect.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-74-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be varied
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (4)

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

74(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Authority must not vary controlled operation without authorising officer's satisfaction.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-74-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...authorise a significant alteration...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority cannot vary controlled operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (5) An authority must not be varied...

74(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-74-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: Authorisation required for controlled operations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-76
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation required for controlled operations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

78 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Provide details about a variation of authority, including date and time, description, and period of extension.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-78
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide details about a variation of authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

8 Subsection 3(1) (definition of nominated Tribunal member)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal definition of nominated Tribunal member
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 80(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-80
schema version: 2

80(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: necessary for the nominated Tribunal member’s proper consideration of the application
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: The nominated Tribunal member may require the applicant to provide information.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-80-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

80(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: written record and copy
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Applicant must make a written record of the application and give a copy to the nominated Tribunal member.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-80-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make a written record
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: The nominated Tribunal member must prepare and give a written document to the applicant.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-82
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The nominated Tribunal member must prepare and give a written document to the applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The nominated Tribunal member must prepare and give a written document to the applicant.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-84-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-84
schema version: 2

86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-86-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-86
schema version: 2

88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88
schema version: 2

88(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Chief officer must notify owner of reported loss or damage.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer notifies owner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer receives report of loss or damage

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

88(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Chief officer must notify person of reported injury.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person notified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer notified

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

88(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Notification requirements for chief officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (a) compromise or hinder the controlled operation or any related investigation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (b) compromise the identity of a participant in the controlled operation;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (c) endanger the life or safety of any person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (d) prejudice any legal proceeding;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (e) otherwise be contrary to the public interest;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

88(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Delegation of powers and functions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate

9 Subsection 3(1) (definition of person targeted)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal definition of person targeted
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

90 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: List of prohibited actions for criminal investigation powers
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-90
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) searches of individuals;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits entry onto, or searches or inspection of, premises
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (c) entry onto, or searches or inspection of, premises;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits searches, inspections or seizures of other property
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (d) searches, inspections or seizures of other property;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (e) forensic procedure;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits electronic surveillance devices or telecommunications interception
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (f) electronic surveillance devices or telecommunications interception;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits identification procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (g) identification procedures;

92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 92(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 92(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-92
schema version: 2

92(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Disclosure exemptions for law enforcement agencies
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-92-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted during these periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between disclosure and law enforcement activities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Disclosure is related to law enforcement activities during certain periods

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted under these conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from disclosure obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Disclosure is not required for certain purposes

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

92(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-92-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

92(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: An offence against this section is an indictable offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-92-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indictable offence
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 94(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 94(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 94(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-94
schema version: 2

94(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Information about the controlled operation, including possession of illicit goods.
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Identify law enforcement agencies and individuals with possession of narcotic goods.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

94(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Identify law enforcement agency or person with possession of narcotic goods.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to identify law enforcement agency or person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

94(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Disclosing identity may endanger safety or prejudice investigation/prosecution.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for disclosure of identity.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents knowledge about disclosure of identity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of identity under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about disclosure of identity.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for disclosure of identity.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...

96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 96(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 96(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-96
schema version: 2

96(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: The Ombudsman may require additional information from an authorising agency.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-96-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide additional information
modality: Deontic
operator: require

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

96(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: No obligation to provide particulars of a controlled operation for 6 months if not completed during that period.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-96-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

96(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Must provide a copy of the report to the Minister at the same time as it is given to the Ombudsman.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-96-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-98
schema version: 2

98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Minister must lay report before Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

98(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Agency must provide comments on report comprehensiveness and adequacy.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide comments.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

98(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Prohibition on disclosing information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

98(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Particulars of a controlled operation must be included in a report for the year in which the operation is completed.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars of a controlled operation in the report for the year it is completed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

98(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Must send copy of report to State or Territory Minister with responsibility for corresponding law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to send copy of report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Table of sections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 11.1(7) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Insertion of new sections into the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

10 Section 15.4 of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Joint commission for committing an offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Duty
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds duty
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Duty
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has duty
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDuty

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-4
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Duty
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds duty
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Duty
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-6
schema version: 2

11 Subsection 70.5(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Insertion of new subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Section 11

12 Paragraph 302.6(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

13 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Insertion of new section
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.173
note: Associating with a criminal organisation or member is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of association with a criminal organisation or member.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of association as a crime.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Subsection 5(1)

15 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.173
note: Definition of criminal organisation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.173
note: Defines member of a criminal organisation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a director and an officer of the body corporate;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of key term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Insert: member, of a criminal organisation, includes:

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: in the case of an organisation that is a body corporate—a director and an officer of the body corporate;

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subsection 5(1)

166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 166(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166
schema version: 2

166(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Offence committed in accordance with the agreement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct occurs during the course of carrying out the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The conduct occurs during the course of carrying out the agreement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) To the extent that a physical element of the joint offence consists of a circumstance—the conduct engaged in, or a result of the conduct engaged in, occurs in that circumstance

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence is committed if it is done in accordance with the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to commit an offence in accordance with the agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (2) An offence is committed in accordance with the agreement

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

166(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Reckless intention to commit an offence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commission of the joint offence overlaps with the intention to commit an offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between intention and commission
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The person intends to commit an offence at some point in time

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence is committed in the course of carrying out the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Intention to commit an offence is a joint obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person intends to commit an offence

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence is committed in the course of carrying out the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Joint obligation for committing an offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Another party commits an offence in the course of carrying out the agreement

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence is committed in the course of carrying out the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Joint obligation for reckless conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person is reckless about committing an offence

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between the intention to commit an offence and the commission of the joint offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between intention and commission
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: The person intends to commit an offence at some point in time

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

166(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Intention to commit an offence is required for guilt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Intention occurs during guilt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between intention and guilt.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: For a person to be guilty of an offence because of the operation of this section, the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Guilt requires intention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires intention to commit an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Guilt requires intention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires intention to commit an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: For a person to be guilty of an offence because of the operation of this section, the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Intention occurs during guilt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between intention and guilt.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: For a person to be guilty of an offence because of the operation of this section, the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

166(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Agreement may be entered into before or at the same time as conduct constituting physical elements of joint offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter into agreement before or at same time as conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: may

166(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: A person cannot be found guilty of an offence if they terminated their involvement and took reasonable steps to prevent the conduct.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Guilty verdict not possible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on being found guilty
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Terminated involvement and prevention steps taken

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

166(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence despite another party not being prosecuted or present.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

166(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Any special liability provisions apply to the joint offence for determining guilt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal intervals are relevant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals are relevant for determining guilt.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
premise text: The operation of this section determines whether a person is guilty.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The special liability provisions apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Special liability provisions apply to the joint offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: This section applies to the joint offence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

168 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-168-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-168
schema version: 2

16A After subsection 5D(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: against
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
modality: CogAI
operator: against
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence is a serious offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
modality: Diffusion
operator: against
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
modality: LTL
operator: against
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16A After subsection 5D(3)

17 At the end of section 5D
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: An offence is a serious offence if it involves or would involve associating with a criminal organisation, contributing to its activities, aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring the commission of a prescribed offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The text states that an offence is a serious offence if it meets certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 At the end of section 5D

170 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: Prohibition on associating with an organisation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-170
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of the organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Associating with the organisation is during membership
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (i) an associate member or prospective member...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of the organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids association with the organisation
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (i) an associate member or prospective member...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (ii) a person who identifies himself or herself...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Combines multiple prohibitions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: (i) an associate member or prospective member...

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 170 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

172 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Performance of a function or duty under an organised crime control law is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-172
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits performance of a function or duty under an organised crime control law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 172 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act

18 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
note: Conditional commencement of subsections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
schema version: 2

18A Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
note: Declaration of an organisation as a declared organisation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18a
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class of organisations.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18A Subsection 5(1)

18B Subsection 5(1) (at the end of subparagraphs (c)(i), (ii),
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
note: Add “or” at the end of subparagraphs (c)(i), (ii) of the definition of permitted purpose
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18b
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding to a set
modality: Deontic
operator: Add

18C Subsection 5(1) (at the end of paragraph (c) of the
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18c
schema version: 2

18D After paragraph 5B(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Prohibition on proceedings under or relating to organised crime control laws
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18d
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings under or relating to organised crime control laws
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

18E At the end of paragraphs 6L(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Add “or” at the end of paragraphs 6L(1)(a), (b) and (c)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18e
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Add ‘or’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Add

18F After paragraph 6L(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Permission to proceed under an organised crime control law of that State
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18f
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

18G At the end of paragraph 6L(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Add “or”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18g
schema version: 2

18H After subparagraph 68(d)(i)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Subject matter of a proceeding under an organised crime control law of a State.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18h
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18H After subparagraph 68(d)(i)

18J Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Applicability of amendments to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18j
schema version: 2

19 February
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
schema version: 2

19 February
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19 May 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-3
schema version: 2

19 February
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-4
schema version: 2

19 February
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-5
schema version: 2

19 Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.177
note: Governor-General may make regulations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May prescribe matters
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Regulations

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.179
note: See s. 2(1)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-7
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement rules
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Defines the day on which the Act receives Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 11.2(5) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Omit 'principal offender', substitute 'other person'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-4
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20 February
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-3
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedules amendment and repeal rules
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 11.2(6) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Modify Criminal Code subsection 11.2(6)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Schedule 2 reference
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 After section 11.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of Schedule 2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 11.6(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Omit certain provisions from the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.179
note: Schedule 2, item 154: 1 Jan — ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: next day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 14.1(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A specific point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Subsection 15.1(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 15.2(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

9 Subsection 15.3(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
type: Document
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to the enforcement of the criminal law, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 3 of 2010
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU