Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 3 of 2010
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to the enforcement of the criminal law, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-2
note: Table of sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-2-norm

19 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-2
note: Defines the day on which the Act receives Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-2-norm

19 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-2-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-norm

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Schedule 2 reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-norm

19 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-3-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Commencement of Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: next day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-2-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
premise text: The day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: A specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-4-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-norm

20 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-3-norm

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-3
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-3-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-norm

19 February
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-5
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-5-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-2
note: Schedules amendment and repeal rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-2-norm

1 After paragraph 5(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Deprive persons of unexplained wealth amounts not derived from certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 After paragraph 5(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
logic summary: Duty to deprive unexplained wealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Paragraph 5(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Omit 'and literary proceeds', substitute ', literary proceeds and unexplained wealth amounts'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'and literary proceeds'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Paragraph 5(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Omit 'and literary proceeds', substitute ', literary proceeds and unexplained wealth amounts'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'and literary proceeds'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Add unexplained wealth orders requiring payment of unexplained wealth amounts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 At the end of section 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires payment of unexplained wealth amounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 After section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm

20A Restraining orders—unexplained wealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20a
note: Restrict property disposal or handling without court order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20A Restraining orders—unexplained wealth
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restricts action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2
has part: 4(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(3C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 4(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8

4(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Property specified in the application must not be disposed of or otherwise dealt with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disposal or other handling of specified property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Affidavit must include grounds for suspicions
description: grounds on which authorised officer holds suspicions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit must be supported by an affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may order specified property disposal for meeting legal expenses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(3A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may make order despite section 24
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(3B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to follow court order
premise text: Section 24
conclusion text: Order under subsection (3A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may refuse to make restraining order if costs assessor does not certify proper expenses.
description: Certification of proper legal expenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court prohibits payment of expenses without certification
premise text: Court may require certification
conclusion text: Payment of expenses is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4
part of: 4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may refuse restraining order if not in public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to refuse
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
has part: 6(4A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 6(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 6(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10

6(4A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may order costs on an indemnity basis if restraining order is refused.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(4A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to order costs on an indemnity basis.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-5
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may make a restraining order even if there is no risk of the property being disposed of or otherwise dealt with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-6
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: No property acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits acquiring property after a restraining order is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between acquiring property and making a restraining order.
premise text: (6) The court may specify that a *restraining order covers property that is acquired by the *suspect after the court makes the order. Otherwise, no property that is acquired after a court makes a restraining order is covered by the order.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 29(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
note: Substitute section numbers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 After section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Insert clause after section 29
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-norm

29A Court may exclude property from a restraining order made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a
note: Court may exclude property from a restraining order made under section 20A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 29A Court may exclude property from a restraining order made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits exclusion of property from a restraining order.
premise text: The court to which an application for a *restraining order under section 20A was made may...
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Exclusion may occur at any time.
premise text: The court to which an application for a *restraining order under section 20A was made may...
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Exclusion may be repeated.
premise text: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31;
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to exclude property.
premise text: ...the court to which an application for a *restraining order under section 20A was made may...
conclusion text: ...exclude specified property from the order if: (a) an application is made under section 30 or 31; and...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

8 Paragraph 35(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Inserts 'or 29A' after '29'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 39(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Inserts a number after a note.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm

10 At the end of subsection 39(1) (after the note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Court may order Official Trustee to pay unexplained wealth amount out of property covered by restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 At the end of section 45
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Section 45 does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A.
premise text: This section applies to all restraining orders.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A during its effective period.
premise text: The effective period of this section starts at the beginning.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A during its effective period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A until the end of this section's effective period.
premise text: The effective period of this section ends at the end.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A until the end of this section's effective period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A from being applied during its effective period.
premise text: The effective period of this section starts at the beginning.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A during its effective period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Section 45 excludes restraining orders made under section 20A from being applied until the end of this section's effective period.
premise text: The effective period of this section ends at the end.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to a restraining order made under section 20A until the end of this section's effective period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 At the end of Division 6 of Part 2-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-norm

45A Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45a
has part: 45A(1) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
has part: 45A(2) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11

45A(1) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1
part of: 45A Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
note: Cease restraining order if no application for unexplained wealth order is made within 28 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(1) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cease
logic summary: Cease action
premise text: Restraining order made under section 20A.
conclusion text: Cease to be in force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Time interval of 28 days
premise text: Restraining order was made on or after the start of this time interval.
conclusion text: Cease to be in force at the end of this time interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Cease action until new application is made
premise text: No application for unexplained wealth order has been made within 28 days.
conclusion text: Cease to be in force at the end of this time interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuse information about ceasing restraining order
premise text: Restraining order made under section 20A.
conclusion text: Cease to be in force if no application for unexplained wealth order is made within 28 days.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classify as unexplained wealth order
premise text: No application for unexplained wealth order has been made within 28 days.
conclusion text: Suspect is subject to unexplained wealth order
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(2) Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2
part of: 45A Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
note: Cessation of restraining orders relating to unexplained wealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Restraining order ceases to be in force
premise text: (2) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) an application for an *unexplained wealth order is made in relation to the *suspect to whom the restraining order relates;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
has part: 8(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 8(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12

8(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Ceases to be in force if unexplained wealth order is made or appealed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
logic summary: Overlaps with unexplained wealth orders
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implies cessation of restraining order if unexplained wealth order is made or appealed
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DIFFUSES
logic summary: Diffuses to unexplained wealth orders
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: COGNIZES
logic summary: Cognizes cessation of restraining order if unexplained wealth order is made or appealed
premise text: (3) A *restraining order made under section 20A ceases to be in force...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4
part of: 8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may order costs on an indemnity basis if a restraining order ceases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to make costs orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 At the end of Chapter 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Add at the end of Chapter 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-norm

179A Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179a
note: Requires a person to attend court for the purpose of deciding whether to make an unexplained wealth order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179A Simplified outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a person to attend court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179B Making an order requiring a person to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179b
has part: 179B(1) Making an order requiring a person to appear
has part: 179B(2) Making an order requiring a person to appear
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.13

179B(1) Making an order requiring a person to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1
part of: 179B Making an order requiring a person to appear
note: Order to appear before court for investigation of unexplained wealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179B(1) Making an order requiring a person to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Legal obligation to appear
premise text: Court order
conclusion text: Appearance required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179B(2) Making an order requiring a person to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2
part of: 179B Making an order requiring a person to appear
note: Application for unexplained wealth order must be supported by affidavit stating identity and suspicions of excessive wealth.
description: Affidavit from authorised officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179B(2) Making an order requiring a person to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide affidavit
conclusion text: Affidavit must be provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
note: Court must make order without notice if DPP requests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make order without notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c
has part: 179C(1) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
has part: 179C(2) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
has part: 179C(4) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
has part: 179C(5) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14

179C(1) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-1
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
note: Person may apply to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-1-norm

179C(2) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
note: Application for revocation of preliminary unexplained wealth order must be made within 28 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179C(2) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179C(4) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-4
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
note: Remains in force until court revokes order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-4-norm

179C(5) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5
part of: 179C Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
note: Court may revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order on application under subsection (1) if satisfied that there are no grounds, it is in the public interest, or it is otherwise in the interests of justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179C(5) Application to revoke a preliminary unexplained wealth order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order
premise text: Court may revoke...
conclusion text: ...on application under subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order in public interest
premise text: it is in the public interest to do so
conclusion text: ...to revoke the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179c-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to revoke preliminary unexplained wealth order for other reasons
premise text: it is otherwise in the interests of justice to do so
conclusion text: ...to revoke the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca
has part: 179CA(1) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(2) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(3) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(4) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(5) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
has part: 179CA(6) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14

179CA(1) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-1
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
note: Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179CA(1) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

179CA(2) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
note: Applicant may appear and adduce material at the hearing of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179CA(2) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Applicant has a right to appear and adduce material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179CA(3) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
note: Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
description: written notice of the application; a copy of any affidavit supporting the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice and affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Application must be made within a specific time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179CA(4) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
note: DPP may appear and adduce additional material at the hearing of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Duty to appear and adduce material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179CA(5) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
note: Must provide affidavit to applicant
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179CA(6) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6
part of: 179CA Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
note: Notice and copies of affidavits must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179CA(6) Notice and procedure on application to revoke preliminary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice and copies of affidavits
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavits must be given under subsections (3) and (5)
conclusion text: The state must provide notice and copies of affidavits within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing notice and copies of affidavats
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavats must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.
conclusion text: The timeframe for providing notice and copies of affidavats is between now and the hearing date
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing notice and copies of affidavats
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavats must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.
conclusion text: The timeframe for providing notice and copies of affidavats is between now and the hearing date
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice and copies of affidavats within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application
premise text: (6) The notice and copies of affidavats must be given under subsections (3) and (5) within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application.
conclusion text: The state must provide notice and copies of affidavats within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179D Notice of revocation of a preliminary unexplained wealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179d
note: Written notice of revocation to applicant
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179d-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
conclusion text: The DPP must give written notice of the revocation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179E Making an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179e
has part: 179E(1) Making an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179E(2) Making an unexplained wealth order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15

179E(1) Making an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1
part of: 179E Making an unexplained wealth order
note: Court may order person to pay amount to Commonwealth if wealth not derived from certain offenses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179E(1) Making an unexplained wealth order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has obligation to order payment if wealth not derived from certain offenses.
premise text: (1) A court with *proceeds jurisdiction may make an order (an unexplained wealth order) requiring a person to pay an amount to the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the court has made a *preliminary unexplained wealth order in relation to the person; and (b) the court is not satisfied that the whole or any part of the person’s *wealth was not derived from one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Wealth derived from certain offenses is between the time of offense and payment.
premise text: (a) the court has made a *preliminary unexplained wealth order in relation to the person;
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the court has made a *preliminary unexplained wealth order in relation to the person; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Court's obligation ends when payment is made.
premise text: (b) the court is not satisfied that the whole or any part of the person’s *wealth was not derived from one or more of the following:
conclusion text: ...if: (b) the court is not satisfied that the whole or any part of the person’s *wealth was not derived from one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179E(2) Making an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2
part of: 179E Making an unexplained wealth order
note: Court must specify the amount of unexplained wealth to be paid to the Commonwealth.
description: Amount of unexplained wealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179E(2) Making an unexplained wealth order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must specify
conclusion text: The court must specify in the order that the person is liable to pay...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for unexplained wealth calculation
premise text: (2) The court must specify in the order that the person is liable to pay...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
has part: 12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 12(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 12(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 12(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16

12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Burden of proof for wealth not derived from offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Burden of proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may consider information not included in application when making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May consider additional information
premise text: subsection (1)
conclusion text: subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Section 317 has effect despite subsection (3) of section 12(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section 317 has effect despite subsection (3) of section 12(5)
premise text: Subsection (3)
conclusion text: Section 317
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may refuse to make order if not in public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refusal
logic summary: Court refusal
premise text: Not in public interest
conclusion text: Order refused
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179EA Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ea
has part: 179EA(1) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
has part: 179EA(2) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16

179EA(1) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1
part of: 179EA Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
note: Refusal to make order without undertaking on damages/costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Refusal to make order
premise text: Court may refuse
conclusion text: Order not made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179EA(2) Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2
part of: 179EA Refusal to make an order for failure to give undertaking
note: The DPP may give an undertaking on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179EB Costs
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179eb
note: Court may make order for costs on an indemnity basis if preliminary or unexplained wealth orders are refused.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179EB Costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179F Ancillary orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179f
has part: 179F(1) Ancillary orders
has part: 179F(2) Ancillary orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16

179F(1) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1
part of: 179F Ancillary orders
note: Court may make ancillary orders to an unexplained wealth order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179F(1) Ancillary orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179F(2) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179f-ss-2
part of: 179F Ancillary orders
note: Court may make ancillary orders to a preliminary unexplained wealth order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179f-ss-2-norm

179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g
has part: 179G(1) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
has part: 179G(2) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
has part: 179G(3) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
has part: 179G(4) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17

179G(1) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-1
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts
note: Defines total wealth for the purposes of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179G(1) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

179G(2) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-2
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts
note: Defines total wealth as the sum of property values
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179G(2) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

179G(3) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts
note: Determine the value of disposed property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179G(3) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to determine property value
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179G(4) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4
part of: 179G Determining unexplained wealth amounts
note: Determine the value of unexplained property amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179G(4) Determining unexplained wealth amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to determine property values
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-norm

179H Effect of property vesting in an insolvency trustee
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179h
note: Property vests in trustee upon insolvency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179H Effect of property vesting in an insolvency trustee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Property continues to be the person's property
premise text: None
conclusion text: Property vests in trustee upon insolvency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179J Reducing unexplained wealth amounts to take account of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179j
note: Deduct unexplained wealth amounts from a person's total wealth when determining an unexplained wealth order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179J Reducing unexplained wealth amounts to take account of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Deduction
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to deduct unexplained wealth amounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179j-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal deduction
logic summary: Requires deducting unexplained wealth amounts at a specific time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k
has part: 179K(1) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
has part: 179K(2) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
has part: 179K(3) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
has part: 179K(4) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18

179K(1) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
note: Court may vary unexplained wealth order to increase amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179K(1) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179K(2) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
note: Increase unexplained wealth amount under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179K(2) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May increase unexplained wealth amount
premise text: Value of property deducted from unexplained wealth
conclusion text: Increase unexplained wealth amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179K(3) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
note: Increase unexplained wealth amount under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179K(3) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: an appeal against the amount payable, or against the order, is allowed
conclusion text: The unexplained wealth amount may be increased
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179K(4) Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4
part of: 179K Varying unexplained wealth orders to increase amounts
note: The DPP's application may deal with more than one increase to the same unexplained wealth amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May deal with more than one increase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179L Relieving certain dependants from hardship
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179l
has part: 179L(1) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
has part: 179L(2) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.19

179L(1) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1
part of: 179L Relieving certain dependants from hardship
note: The court must pay a specified amount to a dependent if the unexplained wealth order would cause hardship and the amount relieves that hardship.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179L(1) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The court must pay a specified amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179L(2) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2
part of: 179L Relieving certain dependants from hardship
note: Must not exceed the person's unexplained wealth amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 179L(2) Relieving certain dependants from hardship
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding the person's unexplained wealth amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Within
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Within
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Within
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the specified amount and the person's unexplained wealth amount.
premise text: (2) The specified amount must not exceed the person’s *unexplained wealth amount.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: An order under this section may relate to more than one of the person's dependants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: relates_to
logic summary: Relates to dependants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179M DPP may apply for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179m
note: DPP may apply for an unexplained wealth order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179m-norm

179N Notice of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n
has part: 179N(1) Notice of application
has part: 179N(2) Notice of application
has part: 179N(3) Notice of application
has part: 179N(4) Notice of application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20

179N(1) Notice of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1
part of: 179N Notice of application
note: Notice requirements for unexplained wealth order application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179N(2) Notice of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2
part of: 179N Notice of application
note: Provide written notice and a copy of the application to the person subject to the unexplained wealth order.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice and application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179N(3) Notice of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3
part of: 179N Notice of application
note: Must provide a copy of supporting affidavit to the person subject to the unexplained wealth order.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179N(4) Notice of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4
part of: 179N Notice of application
note: Provide copies of notice under subsection (3) within a reasonable time before the hearing.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179N(4) Notice of application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide copies of notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179P Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179p
has part: 179P(1) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179P(2) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20

179P(1) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1
part of: 179P Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
note: Cannot apply for unexplained wealth order against a person with previous application determined on the merits.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of applying for unexplained wealth order
premise text: Previous application determined on the merits
conclusion text: Cannot apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179P(2) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2
part of: 179P Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
note: Court must satisfy conditions before giving leave for unexplained wealth order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179P(2) Additional application for an unexplained wealth order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Court must satisfy conditions before giving leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q
has part: 179Q(1) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
has part: 179Q(2) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
has part: 179Q(3) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21

179Q(1) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1
part of: 179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements
note: Right to appear and adduce evidence at a hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179Q(1) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Right to appear and adduce evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179Q(2) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2
part of: 179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements
note: Notice requirement for contesting order making
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Notice requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179Q(3) Procedure on application and other notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3
part of: 179Q Procedure on application and other notice requirements
note: DPP may appear and adduce evidence at the hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to appear and adduce evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r
has part: 179R(1) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179R(2) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179R(3) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
has part: 179R(4) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21

179R(1) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
note: Civil debt due by the person to the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179R(1) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: due
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: civil debt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179R(2) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
note: An unexplained wealth order against a person may be enforced as if it were an order made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179R(2) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enforcement
logic summary: Enforces an obligation
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The person must comply with the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
logic summary: Establishes a relation between the order and the debt.
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: There is a relation between the order and the debt.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Establishes a trace between the order and the debt.
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: There is a trace between the order and the debt.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to comply with the order.
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The obligation to comply with the order is diffused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
logic summary: Classifies the order as a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth.
premise text: The order is made in civil proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179R(3) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
note: Debt is considered a judgment debt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179R(3) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Debt is considered a judgment debt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⊢
logic summary: Implication
premise text: None
conclusion text: Debt is a judgment debt.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179R(4) Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4
part of: 179R Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order
note: Enforcement of an unexplained wealth order after death
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179r-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between unexplained wealth order and person's death
premise text: Temporal interval between two events
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179S Property subject to a person’s effective control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179s
note: Subject to effective control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179s-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179s-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179S Property subject to a person’s effective control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
has part: 18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22

18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Property may be enforced as if it were the person's property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement against property as if it were the person's property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-3
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Granting of restraining order in respect of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to make a restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-4
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: DPP must give written notice of application to person subject to unexplained wealth order and any person with interest in property.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-5
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: May appear and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May appear and adduce evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179SA Legal expenses
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179sa
has part: 179SA(1) Legal expenses
has part: 179SA(2) Legal expenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22

179SA(1) Legal expenses
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1
part of: 179SA Legal expenses
note: Court may order specified property not available to satisfy unexplained wealth order for legal expenses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179SA(2) Legal expenses
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2
part of: 179SA Legal expenses
note: Court may require certification of proper legal expenses before paying expenses from property covered by an order.
description: Certification that legal expenses have been properly incurred
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179SA(2) Legal expenses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court obligation to require certification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t
has part: 179T(1) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
has part: 179T(2) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
has part: 179T(3) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23

179T(1) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1
part of: 179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
note: Registrar must issue certificate if court makes unexplained wealth order exceeding jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179T(1) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must issue certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179T(2) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2
part of: 179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
note: Court must register certificate in a court having jurisdiction with respect to the recovery of debts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179T(2) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179T(3) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3
part of: 179T Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
note: Certificate is enforceable as a final judgment of the court in favour of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179T(3) Amounts exceeding the court’s jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to enforce certificate as final judgment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179U Parliamentary supervision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179u
has part: 179U(1) Parliamentary supervision
has part: 179U(2) Parliamentary supervision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23

179U(1) Parliamentary supervision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1
part of: 179U Parliamentary supervision
note: Subject to parliamentary oversight
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179U(1) Parliamentary supervision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJCT
logic summary: Subject to oversight
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: Oversight required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179U(2) Parliamentary supervision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2
part of: 179U Parliamentary supervision
note: Committee may require agencies to appear before it and give evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Committee must require agencies to appear before it and give evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 After paragraph 202(5)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
note: Insert Schedule 1 Unexplained wealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT
logic summary: Insertion of new provision
premise text: New provision inserted
conclusion text: Schedule 1 Unexplained wealth inserted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Requires document for identifying or locating property of a person with suspected excessive wealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires document for identifying or locating property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Paragraph 202(5)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 After section 282
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm

282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a
has part: 282A(1) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
has part: 282A(2) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
has part: 282A(3) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
has part: 282A(4) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24

282A(1) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
note: Court may direct Official Trustee to pay Commonwealth from restrained property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directive obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282A(2) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
note: Court direction to Official Trustee regarding unexplained wealth order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 282A(2) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion in court order
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...
conclusion text: ...such a direction in the order if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps-with
logic summary: Temporal overlap between restraining order and unexplained wealth order
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...
conclusion text: ...the *restraining order: ...and (b) relates to property that constitutes part of the person’s *total wealth.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion in restraining order
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...
conclusion text: ...the *restraining order: ...and (b) relates to property that constitutes part of the person’s *total wealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of property in unexplained wealth order
premise text: (2) The court that makes the *unexplained wealth order may include...
conclusion text: ...property that constitutes part of the person’s *total wealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

282A(3) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
note: Court may direct Official Trustee to take action against person with unexplained wealth order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 282A(3) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282A(4) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4
part of: 282A Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
note: Court direction to Official Trustee on unexplained wealth order or restraining order application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 282A(4) Direction by a court to the Official Trustee in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-282a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court obligation to make direction
premise text: Application by DPP
conclusion text: Direction made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsections 283(1) and 284(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Inserts 'or 282A' after '282'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 284(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Paragraph 284(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 285(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
note: Insertion of section 282A after section 282
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-norm

21 Subsection 285(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 285(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 At the end of section 286
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Credit money to Confiscated Assets Account in satisfaction of liability under Unexplained Wealth Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 At the end of section 286
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Official Trustee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
note: Person's liability under unexplained wealth order is discharged to the extent of credit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
logic summary: Discharge obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 After paragraph 296(3)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Inserts amount into subsection 179R(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 After paragraph 296(3)(f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

25 Paragraph 322(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Omit specific words from a penalty order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific words
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsection 322(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-norm

27 After subsection 322(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Appeal against unexplained wealth order or related order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 After subsection 322(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal obligation to appeal
premise text: Subsection (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Appeal against targeted order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 335(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Insertion of phrase after 'order'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-norm

29 At the end of section 335
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: States and Territories with jurisdiction to deal with criminal matters on indictment have proceeds jurisdiction for preliminary unexplained wealth orders or unexplained wealth orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 At the end of section 335
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: States and Territories have jurisdiction to deal with criminal matters on indictment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Section 336
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Substitute 'literary proceeds or wealth' for 'or literary proceeds'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the legislative body
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Section 336
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Substitute 'literary proceeds or wealth' for 'or literary proceeds'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Section 336
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32 After section 336
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-norm

336A Meaning of property or wealth being lawfully acquired
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-336a
note: Property or wealth is lawfully acquired if it was and the consideration for it was.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 336A Meaning of property or wealth being lawfully acquired
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-336a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: A
conclusion text: B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Section 338 (definition of confiscation order)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Substitute clause in definition of confiscation order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace clause with new one
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Definition of 'lawfully acquired' affected by section 336A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-norm

35 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Requires person to appear before court under section 179B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Section 338
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies 'unexplained wealth order' as a preliminary order.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm

36 Section 338 (definition of restraining order)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Substitute “20 or 20A” for “or 20”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to follow the substitution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: same meaning
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: same meaning
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: same meaning
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: same meaning
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: same meaning
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Crimes Act 1914.
premise text: Section 3AA of the Crimes Act 1914 sets out when a State offence has a federal aspect.
conclusion text: State offence with a federal aspect has the same meaning.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

38 Section 338 (definition of suspect)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Defines 'suspect' in relation to restraining orders and confiscation orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Section 338 (definition of suspect)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the 'suspect' term into a category.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Defines total wealth for a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-39-norm

40 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Defines unexplained wealth amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: unexplained wealth amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Definition of 'unexplained wealth order'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Section 338
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Definition of wealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm

43 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of pecuniary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Add pecuniary penalty order or unexplained wealth order within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of pecuniary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Add
logic summary: Adds pecuniary penalty order or unexplained wealth order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Subparagraph 3(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Substitute 'a number of' for section 5.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Before paragraph 7(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Freezing orders limiting withdrawals from accounts with financial institutions before courts decide applications for restraining orders to cover the accounts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits freezing orders limiting withdrawals from accounts with financial institutions before courts decide applications for restraining orders to cover the accounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Before Part 2-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm

15A Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15a
note: Grounds for freezing an account exist
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-diffusion-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15A Simplified outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Account has grounds for freezing
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.
conclusion text: The account must be frozen
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Freezing order can be made during certain offences
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.
conclusion text: The freezing order can be made during certain offences
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for-all
logic summary: Grounds for freezing exist for all accounts with financial institution
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.
conclusion text: The grounds for freezing exist for all accounts with a financial institution
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Grounds for freezing exist if and only if account is with financial institution
premise text: There are grounds to suspect the account balance reflects proceeds or an instrument of certain offences.
conclusion text: The grounds for freezing exist if and only if the account is with a financial institution
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Magistrate must ensure balance of account is maintained to prevent deprivation of proceeds or instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must ensure balance of account is maintained.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15B Making freezing orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b
has part: 15B(1) Making freezing orders
has part: 15B(2) Making freezing orders
has part: 15B(3) Making freezing orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32

15B(1) Making freezing orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1
part of: 15B Making freezing orders
note: Magistrate must order a financial institution not to allow a withdrawal from an account under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15B(1) Making freezing orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Magistrate prohibits a financial institution from allowing a withdrawal.
premise text: A magistrate must order that...
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Account balance is subject to freezing order for a specified period.
premise text: ...unless an order is made under this section, there is a risk that the balance of the account will be reduced...
conclusion text: ...the balance of the account will be reduced so that a person will not be deprived of all or some of such proceeds...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Magistrate must order a financial institution to freeze an account under certain circumstances.
premise text: (1) A magistrate must order that...
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Magistrate has an obligation to order a financial institution not to allow a withdrawal.
premise text: A magistrate must order that...
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Magistrate has permission to order a financial institution not to allow a withdrawal.
premise text: (1) A magistrate must order that...
conclusion text: ...a *financial institution not allow a withdrawal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15B(2) Making freezing orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2
part of: 15B Making freezing orders
note: Order covers the balance of the account from time to time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15B(2) Making freezing orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15B(3) Making freezing orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3
part of: 15B Making freezing orders
note: No finding required for reasonable grounds and satisfaction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15B(3) Making freezing orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Legal obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15C Affidavit supporting application made in person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15c
note: Application for freezing order must be supported by affidavit of authorised officer
description: affidavit supporting application made in person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15C Affidavit supporting application made in person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be supported by affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15D Applying for freezing orders by telephone or other electronic
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15d
note: An authorised officer may apply for a freezing order by telephone or other electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15D Applying for freezing orders by telephone or other electronic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Identifies a part of a larger provision.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
has part: 30(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34

30(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Application for freezing order must include required information and may be made before affidavit is sworn.
description: all information that would be required in an ordinary application for a *freezing order and supporting affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must include required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-ss-3
part of: 30 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Magistrate may require communication and further information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15E Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e
has part: 15E(1) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(2) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(3) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(4) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(5) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(6) Making order by telephone etc.
has part: 15E(7) Making order by telephone etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34

15E(1) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.
note: Magistrate must issue freezing order if urgent and delay would frustrate effectiveness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must issue freezing order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15E(2) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.
note: Inform applicant of freezing order terms and signing time.
description: telephone, fax or other electronic means
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT-PREDICATE RELATIONSHIP
logic summary: Informing applicant is a predicate about the magistrate and applicant
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15E(3) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.
note: Applicant must complete a form and provide specific information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15E(3) Making order by telephone etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Applicant must complete a form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15E(4) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.
note: Provide a completed freezing order form to the magistrate within two working days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a completed freezing order form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15E(5) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.
note: Must provide affidavit before freezing order is made.
description: affidavit supporting the application and meeting the description in section 15C
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15E(6) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.
note: Failure to comply with subsection (5) results in the freezing order never having had effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance with subsection (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15E(7) Making order by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7
part of: 15E Making order by telephone etc.
note: Attach form of freezing order to documents
description: documents provided under subsection (4) and (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attach form of freezing order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15F Unsigned freezing orders in court proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15f
note: Court must assume freezing order was not duly made unless proved
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15F Unsigned freezing orders in court proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits court from assuming order was made
premise text: Court must assume order was made unless proved
conclusion text: Order not assumed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15G Offence for making false statements in applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15g
note: Making false statements in applications is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15G Offence for making false statements in applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in applications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
note: Omits any matter or thing without which the statement is misleading when making an application for a freezing order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting matter or thing without which the statement is misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h
has part: 15H(1) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
has part: 15H(2) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
has part: 15H(3) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
has part: 15H(4) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36

15H(1) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
note: False statements of magistrate names in documents with freezing orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15H(1) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits false statements of magistrate names in documents with freezing orders
premise text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years or 120 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relates to temporal interval of document creation or issuance
premise text: Document created or issued
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relates to temporal interval of document validity
premise text: Document valid for a certain period
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
logic summary: Relates to information flow from document creation to issuance
premise text: Document created or issued
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Relates to knowledge representation of document content
premise text: *freezing order under section 15E
conclusion text: Document purports to be a form of *freezing order under section 15E
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15H(2) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
note: Service of unauthorised form of order is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15H(2) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15H(3) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
note: Presenting a document purporting to be a freezing order under section 15E without approval from a magistrate is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of presenting a document purporting to be a freezing order under section 15E without approval from a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15H(4) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4
part of: 15H Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
note: Giving a false document to a financial institution after obtaining a freezing order is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15H(4) Offences relating to orders made under section 15E
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits giving a false document to a financial institution after obtaining a freezing order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15J Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15j
has part: 15J(1) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
has part: 15J(2) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37

15J(1) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1
part of: 15J Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
note: Applicant must serve financial institution and account holders with freezing order
description: Things described in subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(1) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to serve
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15J(2) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2
part of: 15J Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
note: Service of freezing order on financial institution and enforcement agency
description: copy of the order, written statement of name and contact details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(2) Service of freezing order etc. on financial institution and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Imposes duty on State to serve freezing order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15K Freezing order does not prevent withdrawal to enable financial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15k
note: Institution can meet its liabilities despite freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15k-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15K Freezing order does not prevent withdrawal to enable financial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Withdrawal from account for liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the institution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15L Offence for contravening freezing orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15l
note: Allowing withdrawal from account with freezing order is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15L Offence for contravening freezing orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15M Protection from suits etc. for those complying with orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15m
note: Protection from suits for those complying with orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15M Protection from suits etc. for those complying with orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15N When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n
has part: 15N(1) When a freezing order is in force
has part: 15N(2) When a freezing order is in force
has part: 15N(3) When a freezing order is in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38

15N(1) When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1
part of: 15N When a freezing order is in force
note: Order does not come into force if copy is given after end of first working day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: N
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Given a freezing order, the institution must not be given a copy of the order after the end of the first working day.
conclusion text: The order does not come into force if the copy is given after that time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval between order and institution
premise text: The order does not come into force if the copy is given to the institution after the end of the first working day.
conclusion text: This temporal relation must be greater than or equal to one working day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal interval between order and institution
premise text: The order comes into force when a copy of the order is given to the institution.
conclusion text: This temporal relation must be less than or equal to one working day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Positive obligation
premise text: Given a freezing order, the institution must give a copy of the order to itself after the end of the first working day.
conclusion text: This is not the case.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=>
logic summary: Equivalence between obligation and prohibition
premise text: Given a freezing order, the institution must give a copy of the order to itself after the end of the first working day.
conclusion text: This is not the case.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15N(2) When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n-ss-2
part of: 15N When a freezing order is in force
note: Freezing order duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-2-norm

15N(3) When a freezing order is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3
part of: 15N When a freezing order is in force
note: Freezing order cannot specify a period of more than 3 working days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits a specific action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15P Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p
has part: 15P(1) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(2) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(3) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(4) Order extending a freezing order
has part: 15P(5) Order extending a freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39

15P(1) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order
note: Magistrate may extend freezing order period under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15P(1) Order extending a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Magistrate has the power to extend freezing order period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15P(2) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order
note: Extension of freezing order duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Extension of freezing order duration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15P(3) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order
note: Copy of freezing order must be given to financial institution before extension ceases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15P(3) Order extending a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide copy of freezing order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15P(4) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order
note: Applying provisions to an order extending a freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15P(4) Order extending a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applying provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15P(5) Order extending a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5
part of: 15P Order extending a freezing order
note: Affidavit must identify the freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15P(5) Order extending a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
logic summary: Affidavit must contain specific information
premise text: Section 15C requires an affidavit supporting an application
conclusion text: The affidavit must identify the freezing order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
note: Mention of subsection 15B(1) in section 15E(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q
has part: 15Q(1) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
has part: 15Q(2) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
has part: 15Q(3) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40

15Q(1) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1
part of: 15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
note: Allow withdrawal from account to meet certain expenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (1) A magistrate may vary a freezing order...
conclusion text: ...the institution may allow a withdrawal from the account...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap for expenses
premise text: (a) the reasonable living expenses of the person;
conclusion text: ...to meet one or more of the following...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace for expenses
premise text: (b) the reasonable living expenses of any of the dependants of the person;
conclusion text: ...the reasonable living expenses of any of the dependants of the person;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of expenses to dependants
premise text: (c) the reasonable business expenses of the person;
conclusion text: ...the reasonable business expenses of the person;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of debt
premise text: (d) a specified debt incurred in good faith by the person.
conclusion text: ...a specified debt incurred in good faith by the person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15Q(2) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2
part of: 15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
note: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
premise text: a person in whose name the account is held has applied for the variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
premise text: the magistrate is satisfied that the expense or debt does not, nor will not, relate to legal costs that the person has incurred, nor will incur, in connection with proceedings under this Act; or proceedings for an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
premise text: the magistrate is satisfied that the person cannot meet the expense or debt out of property that is not covered by: a freezing order; or a restraining order; or an interstate restraining order; or a foreign restraining order that is registered under the Mutual Assistance Act
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
premise text: the person has notified the DPP in writing of the application and the grounds for the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15Q(3) Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3
part of: 15Q Magistrate may vary freezing order to allow withdrawal to
note: Written notice must be given to financial institution before variation takes effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Written notice is a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15R Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r
has part: 15R(1) Application to revoke a freezing order
has part: 15R(2) Application to revoke a freezing order
has part: 15R(3) Application to revoke a freezing order
has part: 15R(4) Application to revoke a freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41

15R(1) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order
note: Application for revocation of a freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to revoke a freezing order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15R(2) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order
note: Notice must be given to the enforcement agency before revocation application can be made.
description: Written notice of application and grounds for revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15R(2) Application to revoke a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15R(3) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order
note: Additional material may be provided to the magistrate relating to the application to revoke a freezing order.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15R(3) Application to revoke a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to provide additional material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15R(4) Application to revoke a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4
part of: 15R Application to revoke a freezing order
note: Magistrate may revoke freezing order if in interests of justice to do so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate may revoke freezing order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15S Notice of revocation of a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15s
has part: 15S(1) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
has part: 15S(2) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41

15S(1) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1
part of: 15S Notice of revocation of a freezing order
note: Notify financial institution and account holders of revocation of freezing order.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15S(1) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to notify financial institution and account holders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15S(2) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2
part of: 15S Notice of revocation of a freezing order
note: Notifying officer must give notice to applicant for revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15S(2) Notice of revocation of a freezing order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
premise text: Notifying officer need not give notice to the applicant for revocation.
conclusion text: The notifying officer must give notice to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15s-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
premise text: However, the notifying officer need not give notice to the applicant for revocation.
conclusion text: The notifying officer must give notice to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
note: No more than one authorised officer is required to give notice of revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ≤
logic summary: No more than one officer is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Paragraph 337A(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Insertion of 'freezing order' after 'for a'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm

5 Paragraph 337A(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Insert *freezing order or after “for a”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Definition of freezing order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Definition of working day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Section 338
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

8 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Application of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 21E(4) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Insert 'freezing orders' after 'for' in subsection 21E(4)(a) of the definition of confiscation proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits inserting 'freezing orders' after 'for'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 4(1) (before paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Amendment of proceeds of crime order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1) (before paragraph (a) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-norm

11 Paragraph 18(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: There are reasonable grounds to suspect that a person has committed a serious offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Paragraph 18(1)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraph 18(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Authorised officer suspects suspect committed offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Paragraph 18(3)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: suspect
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
premise text: Authorised officer suspects suspect committed offence.
conclusion text: Investigate suspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 At the end of subparagraph 19(1)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Add “and”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 At the end of subparagraph 19(1)(d)(ii)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
conclusion text: The State must add “and”.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Paragraph 19(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Omit specific clause from terrorism offence provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Application of amendments of sections 18 and 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Application of amendments for a restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-15-norm

16 Paragraph 47(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Court must be satisfied that a person engaged in serious offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Paragraph 47(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court must be satisfied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Paragraph 49(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-17-norm

18 Application of amendments of sections 47 and 49
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Application of amendments of sections 47 and 49
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-18-norm

19 Subsection 84(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Omit “(1)” from subsection 84(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-19-norm

20 Subsection 84(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 85(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Omit section 84(1)(a) and substitute with 84(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-21-norm

22 Subsection 85(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Substitute a provision in section 84(1)(b) with a new provision 84(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Subsection 85(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23 Subsection 110(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Omit “(1)”
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-23-norm

24 Subsection 110(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-24-norm

25 Subsection 111(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Substitute clause in section 110(1)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 111(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsection 111(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Omit '110(1)(b)', substitute '110(b)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-26-norm

27 Subparagraph 116(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
note: Omit “subject to subsection (2),”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-norm

28 Subsection 116(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-2
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-28-2-norm

29 Application of amendments of section 116
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Application of amendments of section 116
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and application
premise text: Commencement of amendments for pecuniary penalty order
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Section 149
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-30-2-norm

149 Court may confirm pecuniary penalty order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149
note: Court may confirm pecuniary penalty order if satisfied
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149 Court may confirm pecuniary penalty order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to confirm the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

31 Application of new section 149
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Commencement of section 149 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between sections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Subparagraphs 202(5)(a)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-2
note: Repeal subparagraphs and substitute with prohibition on engaging in serious offence conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to refrain from conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Subparagraphs 202(5)(c)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Repeal subparagraphs and substitute with proceeds of serious offence or instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 202(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34-2
note: Omit “or (iii)”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'or (iii)'
premise text: Omit ‘or (iii)’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Application of amendments of section 202
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
note: Amendments apply to production orders after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Section 338 (paragraph (g) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-2
note: Inserts 'or former section 5, 7, 7A or 86 of the Crimes Act 1914' after Criminal Code in definition of serious offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Section 338 (paragraph (g) of the definition of serious
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inserts
logic summary: Insertion of text into a legal definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-norm

37 Subparagraph 18(2)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-37-norm

38 Subparagraph 18(3)(b)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-2
note: Omit 'terrorism', substitute '*serious'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-38-2-norm

39 Subparagraph 19(1)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
note: Omit “terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-39-norm

40 Subparagraph 19(1)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-2
note: Substitute “serious” for “terrorism”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-40-2-norm

41 Paragraph 19(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-41-norm

42 Application of amendments of sections 18 and 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42-2
note: Amendments apply to applications made on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Application of amendments of sections 18 and 19
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-42-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Subparagraph 29(2)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
note: Omit 'a *terrorism', substitute 'a serious'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-43-norm

44 Subparagraph 29(2)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2
note: Omit 'any terrorism', substitute 'any serious'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-44-2-norm

45 Subparagraph 29(2)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
note: Omit “a *terrorism”, substitute ‘a serious’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits terrorism
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subparagraph 29(2)(d)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Omit 'any terrorism', substitute 'any serious'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits terrorism
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Paragraph 45(6)(ca)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-47-norm

48 Application of amendments of sections 29 and 45
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
note: Amendments apply to restraining orders made after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Application of amendments of sections 29 and 45
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Amendments apply to restraining orders made after commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 At the end of section 47
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: Court may refuse to make forfeiture order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 At the end of section 47
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making forfeiture order
premise text: Court may refuse to make order
conclusion text: Order cannot be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

50 Application of new subsection 47(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
note: Application of new subsection 47(4) to the making of an order on or after its commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-norm

51 Subparagraph 49(1)(c)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
note: Substitute “*serious” for “*terrorism” in subsection 49(1)(c)(iv)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces a term with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-46-2-norm

52 Application of amendment of subparagraph 49(1)(c)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
note: Amendment applies to applications made on or after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-norm

53 At the end of section 49
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
note: Court may refuse to make forfeiture order if not in public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 At the end of section 49
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court may refuse to make forfeiture order.
premise text: Court is satisfied it is not in public interest.
conclusion text: Order shall not be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Application of new subsection 49(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
note: Application of new subsection 49(4) to the making of an order on or after its commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-norm

55 Subparagraph 73(1)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
note: Omit 'a *terrorism', substitute 'a *serious'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-55-norm

56 Subparagraph 73(1)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
note: Omit 'any terrorism', substitute 'any serious'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-norm

57 Subparagraph 73(1)(d)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
note: Replace 'terrorism' with 'serious'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-57-norm

58 Subparagraph 85(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Subparagraph 85(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
note: Replace terrorism with serious in subsection 85(2)(b)(ii)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-59-norm

60 Application of amendments of sections 73 and 85
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
note: Application of amendments of sections 73 and 85
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-60-norm

61 Subparagraph 111(2)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
note: Omit “*terrorism”, substitute “*serious”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-61-norm

62 Subparagraph 111(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
note: Replace terrorism with serious
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-62-norm

63 Application of amendments of section 111
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
note: Amendments of section 111 apply to quashing convictions on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63 Application of amendments of section 111
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-63-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

48 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-48-2-norm

64 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'Chapter 3'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-64-norm

65 At the end of section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
note: Authorises disclosure of information for certain purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-65-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 65 At the end of section 8
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

66 At the end of subsection 223(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
note: List of persons with functions under the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Membership in an authority
premise text: Person is or forms part of an authority
conclusion text: Authority function
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 At the end of Chapter 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-67-norm

266A Disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-266a
note: Disclosure of information required for obtaining a sworn statement under an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 266A Disclosure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-266a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires disclosure of information for obtaining a sworn statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2
has part: 50(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 50(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54

50(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Exemptions from subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain proceedings from subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Prohibition on using a document in evidence against someone who produced or made it available under a production order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits using the document in evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Exemption from subsection (5) for proceedings under specific sections of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission for a specific exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-7
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Does not affect admissibility of information obtained as an indirect consequence of a disclosure under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-7-norm

50(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8
part of: 50 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Clarifies the scope of subsection 228(2) regarding search warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: clarification
logic summary: Clarifies the scope of subsection 228(2)
premise text: Subsection 228(2) is ambiguous
conclusion text: Clarifies the scope of subsection 228(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-50-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
logic summary: Establishes a relation between search warrants and enforcement agencies
premise text: Search warrants require clarification
conclusion text: Establishes a relation between search warrants and enforcement agencies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

68 Section 292
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
has part: 69(1) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
has part: 69(2) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
has part: 69(2A) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55

69(1) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
note: Legal aid commission must pay costs for certain representations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The legal aid commission has a duty to pay costs.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: (c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(2) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-2
part of: 69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
note: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission out of Confiscated Assets Account
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission out of Confiscated Assets Account
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(2A) Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a
part of: 69 Subsections 293(1), (2) and (3)
note: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission out of property covered by the restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Pay legal costs to the legal aid commission.
premise text: The Official Trustee must pay legal costs.
conclusion text: to the legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Legal costs and legal aid commission expenses overlap in time.
premise text: The Official Trustee pays legal costs.
conclusion text: (2A) If the *Official Trustee is satisfied that: (a) the balance of the *Confiscated Assets Account is insufficient to pay the legal costs; and (b) property of the person is covered by the *restraining order; the Official Trustee must pay the legal costs (according to the bill) to the *legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Legal costs are repeatedly paid from the Confiscated Assets Account.
premise text: The Official Trustee pays legal costs.
conclusion text: (2A) If the *Official Trustee is satisfied that: (a) the balance of the *Confiscated Assets Account is insufficient to pay the legal costs; and (b) property of the person is covered by the *restraining order; the Official Trustee must pay the legal costs (according to the bill) to the *legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-69-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Official Trustee has an obligation to pay legal costs.
premise text: The Official Trustee must pay legal costs.
conclusion text: the Official Trustee must pay the legal costs (according to the bill) to the *legal aid commission out of that property covered by the order, to the extent possible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-2
note: Pay Commonwealth an amount equal to the lesser of the amount paid to legal aid commission or value of property covered by restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay Commonwealth an amount equal to the lesser of the amount paid to legal aid commission or value of property covered by restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-52-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The obligation applies during the period when the person has property covered by a restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Division 1 of Part 4-4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
note: Repeal Division 1 of Part 4-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-70-norm

71 Application of amendments of Chapter 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
note: Amendments apply to costs incurred before or on commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Amendments apply to costs incurred before or on commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-71-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Subsection 37(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 37(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-72-norm

73 Subsection 37(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 37(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’
conclusion text: Penalty:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Section 40 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Section 71 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
note: Omit “Maximum penalty:”, substitute “Penalty:”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-75-norm

76 Section 195 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Subsection 196(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 196(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-77-norm

78 Section 199 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Section 200 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Subsection 201(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 201(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’
conclusion text: Penalty:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Section 209 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Subsection 210(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' and substitute 'Penalty:'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'Maximum penalty:',
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-54-2-norm

83 Subsection 210(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 210(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’
conclusion text: Penalty:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Subsection 211(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' and substitute with 'Penalty:'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-84-norm

85 Section 212 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Section 216 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Section 217 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-87
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Section 218 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Section 222 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section 222.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-89-norm

90 Subsection 223(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 223(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-90-norm

91 Subsection 223(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 223(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-91-norm

92 Subsection 223(3) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-92
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 223(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:'
premise text: Omit ‘Maximum penalty:’
conclusion text: Penalty:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Section 224 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Section 232 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-94
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Section 233 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-95
note: Omit “Maximum penalty:”, substitute “Penalty:”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-95-norm

96 Section 234 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-96-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Section 235 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Subsection 246(3) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 246(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-98-norm

99 Section 266 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Subsection 272(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 272(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-100-norm

101 Subsection 272(2) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 272(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-101-norm

102 Section 273 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'Maximum penalty:' from section heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Subsection 274(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103
note: Substitute 'A person' for '(1) A person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-103-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103 Subsection 274(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

104 Subsection 274(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' from subsection 274(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-104-norm

105 Section 275 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-105
note: Omit 'Maximum penalty:' and substitute 'Penalty:'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-105-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-105-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'Maximum penalty:',
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-56-2-norm

106 Subsection 42(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106
note: Court may revoke restraining order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106 Subsection 42(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: May revoke
premise text: Court has power to revoke order
conclusion text: Order may be revoked
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Application and transitional
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107
note: Application and transitional provisions for revocation of restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-2-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 3(1) (definition of ACC authorising officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Repeal the definition of ACC authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-norm

2 Subsection 3(1) (definition of ACLEI authorising officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Repeal the definition of ACLEI authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-2-norm

3 Subsection 3(1) (definition of AFP authorising officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Repeal the definition of AFP authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-3-norm

4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of appropriate authorising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Repeal definition of appropriate authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 3(1) (definition of authorising officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Repeal the definition of authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 3(1) (definition of controlled operation)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Repeal definition of controlled operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-norm

7 Subsection 3(1) (definition of major controlled operation)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Repeal definition of major controlled operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 3(1) (definition of nominated Tribunal member)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Repeal definition of nominated Tribunal member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 3(1) (definition of person targeted)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Repeal definition of person targeted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-norm

58 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-58
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-58-norm

10 Parts IAB and IAC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Repeal Parts and substitute with new Part IAB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-10-norm

15G Objects of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15g
note: Exempts law enforcement officers and certain other persons from criminal liability and civil liability in the course of a controlled operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15G Objects of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts individuals from liability
premise text: Law enforcement officers and certain other persons are exempt from criminal liability and civil liability.
conclusion text: No liability for the individual.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits law enforcement officers and certain other persons to engage in activities without liability
premise text: The exemption permits law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers are permitted to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory without liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on law enforcement officers and certain other persons to take part in controlled operations
premise text: The exemption requires law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers have an obligation to take part in controlled operations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Grants law enforcement officers and certain other persons the right to engage in activities without liability
premise text: The exemption grants law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation the right to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers have the right to engage in the commission of a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory without liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15g-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
logic summary: Establishes the scope and conditions of exemption
premise text: The exemption applies to law enforcement officers who take an active part in a controlled operation and certain other persons who follow instructions from a law enforcement officer.
conclusion text: The exemption is established for law enforcement officers and certain other persons under specific conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ga
has part: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
has part: 15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62

15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-1
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
note: Court discretion not limited by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
note: Disregard evidence obtained from criminal activity under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of evidence based on criminal activity
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...
conclusion text: The fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between controlled operations and criminal activities
premise text: (ii) the person was a participant in an operation authorized under a corresponding State controlled operations law acting in the course of that operation...
conclusion text: The criminal activity was conduct constituting an offence for which a person would, but for section 15HH, be criminally responsible.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of certain conditions in the exclusion of evidence
premise text: (a) both: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115...
conclusion text: The fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if... (i) the person was a participant in a controlled operation authorized under this Part acting in the course of the controlled operation; and (ii) the criminal activity was controlled conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of certain conditions in the exclusion of evidence
premise text: (b) both: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115...
conclusion text: The fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if... (i) the person was a participant in an operation authorized under a corresponding State controlled operations law acting in the course of that operation; and (ii) the criminal activity was conduct constituting an offence for which a person would, but for section 15HH, be criminally responsible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GB Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gb
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gb-norm

15GC Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gc
note: Definitions for controlled operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gc-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gc-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gc-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Defines terms
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-60
note: Defines the meaning of 'authorising officer' and related terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes related terms in the definition of 'authorising officer'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-62
note: Defines terms related to controlled operations and serious offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-62-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Defines terms with explicit definitions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gd
has part: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
has part: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66

15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
note: Defines controlled operation and major controlled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a controlled operation.
premise text: (1) A controlled operation is an operation that:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes when a controlled operation begins and ends.
premise text: Note: Section 15GN specifies when a controlled operation begins and ends.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
note: Defines a major controlled operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a controlled operation
premise text: (2) A major controlled operation is...
conclusion text: ...a controlled operation that is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Defines the scope of a major controlled operation
premise text: (a) involve the infiltration...
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the duration of a major controlled operation
premise text: ...for a period of more than 7 days;
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the duration of a major controlled operation
premise text: ...for a period of more than 7 days;
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gd-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the duration of a major controlled operation
premise text: (a) involve the infiltration...
conclusion text: ...or (b) continue for more than 3 months;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ge
has part: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
has part: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.67

15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
note: Defines serious Commonwealth offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence is defined
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:
conclusion text: (a) involves a matter mentioned in subsection (2); and (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence has a specific definition
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:
conclusion text: (a) involves a matter mentioned in subsection (2); and (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence has a specific duration
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:
conclusion text: (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Serious Commonwealth offence has a specific scope
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, serious Commonwealth offence means a Commonwealth offence that:
conclusion text: (a) involves a matter mentioned in subsection (2); and (b) is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for a period of 3 years or more.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
note: List of serious Commonwealth offences and serious State offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of serious offence
premise text: (2) The matters are as follows:
conclusion text: (a) theft;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal scope of the list
premise text: The matters are as follows:
conclusion text: as from the commencement of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-64
note: List of crimes prohibited by law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specific actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf
has part: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(4) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69

15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
note: Any of the following is an authorising officer for a controlled operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Authorising officer
premise text: (1) Any of the following is an authorising officer for a controlled operation:
conclusion text: The Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner, or any AFP authorising officer, or any ACC authorising officer, or any ACLEI authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the Australian Federal Police.
premise text: (a) if the operation is a major controlled operation and the investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the Australian Federal Police—the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner;
conclusion text: The Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner during the investigation of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
note: List of AFP authorising officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the bearer of the obligation
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:
conclusion text: The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or a senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which the obligation applies
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:
conclusion text: The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or a senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which the obligation applies
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:
conclusion text: The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or a senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
note: Defines who is an ACC authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the obligation.
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: The following are ACC authorising officers:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the Chief Executive Officer and other staff members.
premise text: (b) a member of the staff of the ACC who is an SES employee
conclusion text: and who is authorised in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the ACC for the purposes of this paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isAuthorisedTo
logic summary: Describes the relationship between staff members and the Chief Executive Officer.
premise text: (b) a member of the staff of the ACC who is an SES employee
conclusion text: and who is authorised in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the ACC for the purposes of this paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GF(4) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
note: List of ACLEI authorising officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GF(4) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies ACLEI authorising officers
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:
conclusion text: ACLEI authorising officers: ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Defines time period for ACLEI authorising officers
premise text: (4) The following are ACLEI authorising officers:
conclusion text: During this time, ..., (b) the Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-66
note: Authorisation required for ACLEI staff to perform duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Staff member must be authorised.
premise text: Staff member is an SES employee.
conclusion text: Staff member is authorised.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GG Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg
has part: 15GG(1) Minister may nominate AAT members
has part: 15GG(2) Minister may nominate AAT members
has part: 15GG(3) Minister may nominate AAT members
has part: 15GG(4) Minister may nominate AAT members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70

15GG(1) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members
note: The Minister may nominate AAT members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to nominate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WithinTemporalInterval
logic summary: Temporal interval for nomination
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GG(2) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members
note: Must nominate AAT members with specific qualifications
description: Qualifications for nomination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to nominate
premise text: Minister has power to nominate AAT members
conclusion text: Must meet qualifications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GG(3) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members
note: Minister must withdraw nomination if ceases to hold appointment or by writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to withdraw nomination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GG(4) Minister may nominate AAT members
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4
part of: 15GG Minister may nominate AAT members
note: Protection and immunity for nominated Tribunal members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GG(4) Minister may nominate AAT members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Protection and immunity
premise text: Justice of the High Court
conclusion text: nominated Tribunal member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh
has part: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71

15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-1
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Application for authority to conduct controlled operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Application method for authorities to conduct controlled operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Part of a formal application
premise text: An application is a formal application if it is signed by the applicant
conclusion text: The key is part of a formal application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Part of an urgent application
premise text: An application is an urgent application if it is made orally, in person, or by telephone
conclusion text: The key is part of an urgent application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Application can be made at any time before the controlled operation
premise text: The delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation
conclusion text: The key can be made at any time before the controlled operation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Application must be made before the controlled operation starts
premise text: The success of the controlled operation depends on making an application
conclusion text: The key must be made before the controlled operation starts
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Application method is specified
premise text: An application may be made by means of a written document or orally, in person, or by telephone
conclusion text: The key specifies an application method
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Application type is specified
premise text: An application may be made for an authority to conduct a controlled operation
conclusion text: The key specifies an application type
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Application for authority must be formal if previous application exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Application for authority must be formal if previous application exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Application requirements for controlled operations
description: sufficient information, earlier application details, proposed period of effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must provide required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-68
has part: 68(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 68(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72

68(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-68-ss-5
part of: 68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Authorising officer may require additional information from applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayRequire
logic summary: Mandatory requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-68-ss-6
part of: 68 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Must provide written record of urgent application to authorising officer.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-68-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written record of urgent application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GI Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi
has part: 15GI(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(2) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(3) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(4) Determination of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72

15GI(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1
part of: 15GI Determination of applications
note: Authorise controlled operation with conditions or without
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GI(1) Determination of applications
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Grant authority with conditions or without
premise text: Authorising officer considers application and additional information
conclusion text: Authority granted or refused
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GI(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications
note: Authorising officer must not grant authority to conduct controlled operation unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GI(2) Determination of applications
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on granting authority unless conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GI(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3
part of: 15GI Determination of applications
note: Authorising officer must authorise controlled operation within specific meaning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GI(3) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide authorization
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal scope defined by section 15GF
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an authorising officer may authorise a particular controlled operation only if he or she is an authorising officer for the controlled operation within the meaning of section 15GF.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GI(4) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4
part of: 15GI Determination of applications
note: Authority granted under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GI(4) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (4) An authority granted under this section is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GJ Manner of granting authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gj
note: Authority to conduct a controlled operation may be granted by means of a written document, oral communication, or telephone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Grant
logic summary: Authority to conduct a controlled operation may be granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Excerpt describes authority to conduct a controlled operation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-70
note: Subsequent authority must be formal if granted in respect of a controlled operation with previous authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implying
logic summary: Formal authority required for subsequent control of controlled operation.
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part prevents an authority being granted...
conclusion text: ...the subsequent authority must be a formal authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Subsequent authority overlaps with previous authority.
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part prevents an authority being granted...
conclusion text: ...but in that case the subsequent authority must be a formal authority.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Subsequent authority is both formal and overlaps with previous authority.
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Part prevents an authority being granted...
conclusion text: ...but in that case the subsequent authority must be a formal authority.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-70-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implying
logic summary: Urgent authority can be varied, but not extended.
premise text: Note: An urgent authority can be varied...
conclusion text: ...but not so as to extend its duration—see sections 15GO and 15GS.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GK Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gk
has part: 15GK(1) Form of authority
has part: 15GK(2) Form of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74

15GK(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1
part of: 15GK Form of authority
note: Formal authority requirements
description: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GK(1) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Authority must be granted by a principal law enforcement officer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GK(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2
part of: 15GK Form of authority
note: Authority must provide specific details about the operation.
description: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GK(2) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authority must provide details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-72
has part: 72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76

72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-72-ss-3
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A person is sufficiently identified if they can be matched to their identity by the chief officer of the authorising agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the chief officer to match assumed names, code names, or code numbers with identities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-72-ss-4
part of: 72 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Must not identify persons by identifying a class of persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Must not identify persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-72-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type equality
logic summary: Class of persons is not a valid identifier
conclusion text: Class of persons must be identified separately
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GL Written record of urgent authority must be issued
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gl
note: Authorising officer must issue written record of urgent authority within 7 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gl-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written record of urgent authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gm
note: Authorising officer may nominate another person as principal law enforcement officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gm-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gm-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn
has part: 15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76

15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-1
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
note: Commencement and duration of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-1-norm

15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
note: Clarifies commencement and duration of urgent authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-2-norm

15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-3
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
note: Authority duration and cancellation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gn-ss-3-norm

15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go
has part: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77

15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: Authority may be varied by authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authority to vary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: variation
logic summary: Extension or modification of authority
premise text: (2) A variation may:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: Temporal extension of authority
premise text: (2) A variation may:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: Cannot extend urgent authority period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of extending urgent authority period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: extends
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: extends
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: extends
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: extends
logic summary: Temporal relation between variation and urgent authority
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-74
has part: 74(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 74(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 74(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78

74(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-74-ss-4
part of: 74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: No variation of formal authority can exceed 3 months in effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: must not be varied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-74-ss-5
part of: 74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Authority must not vary controlled operation without authorising officer's satisfaction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Authority cannot vary controlled operation.
premise text: (5) An authority must not be varied...
conclusion text: ...authorise a significant alteration...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-74-ss-6
part of: 74 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-74-ss-6-norm

15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp
has part: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(5) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(6) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(7) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(8) Application to appropriate authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78

15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Permits application for variation of authority to an appropriate authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
conclusion text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: No application for variation can extend the period of effect beyond 3 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on extending the period of effect beyond 3 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-3
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Application method for variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-3-norm

15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Multiple applications for variation under section can be made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Multiple applications for variation under section can be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(5) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Must state earlier urgent variation application details
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GP(5) Application to appropriate authorising officer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(6) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Application must state proposed period of extension not exceeding 3 months.
description: Proposed period of extension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding 3 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(7) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Authorising officer may require applicant to provide information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GP(7) Application to appropriate authorising officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May impose obligation on the authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(8) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Applicant must make a written record and give it to the authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GP(8) Application to appropriate authorising officer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gp-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a written record and give it to the authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gq
has part: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
has part: 15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.79

15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
note: Authorising officer may vary authority subject to conditions or refuse application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to vary authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
note: Must not vary an authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: An appropriate authorising officer must not vary an authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-76
note: Authorisation required for controlled operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Authorisation required for controlled operations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GR Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gr
has part: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
has part: 15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81

15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-1
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority
note: Authority may be varied by an appropriate authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority
note: Authorising officer must provide written document to applicant or principal law enforcement officer.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GS Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gs
note: Variation of authority must identify controlled operation, person varying authority, and application details.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GS Form of variation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specific information for authority variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gs-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Authority variation must relate to a specific controlled operation.
premise text: (1) A variation of an authority by an appropriate authorising officer (whether formal or urgent) must: (a) identify the controlled operation to which the authority relates; and (b) state the name and rank or position of the person varying the authority;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-78
note: Provide details about a variation of authority, including date and time, description, and period of extension.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide details about a variation of authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt
has part: 15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82

15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: Authority to vary formal authority on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Variation of formal authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in the text
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: Maximum extension period for formal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 24 months
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period must be less than or equal to 24 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period cannot exceed 3 months
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period must be less than or equal to 3 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period must be less than or equal to a certain point in time
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to a certain point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period must be less than or equal to a certain interval
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to a certain interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period must be less than or equal to a certain value
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to a certain value
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: May only vary formal authority within 2 weeks before the end of its period of effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
logic summary: May only
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu
has part: 15GU(1) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(2) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(3) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(4) Application to nominated Tribunal member
has part: 15GU(5) Application to nominated Tribunal member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83

15GU(1) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-1
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
note: Application for variation of authority period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GU(1) Application to nominated Tribunal member
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GU(2) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
note: No application can be made for a variation extending the period of effect beyond 24 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on extending the period of effect beyond 24 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GU(3) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
note: Application method for variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Application method for variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Part of a class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GU(4) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
note: Prohibition on making multiple urgent variation applications without formal variation application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GU(4) Application to nominated Tribunal member
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on multiple urgent variation applications.
premise text: (4) More than one application for a variation under this section may be made...
conclusion text: ...the next application must be a formal variation application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GU(5) Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
note: Application for variation must state earlier urgent variation application details
description: Details of earlier urgent variation application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GU(5) Application to nominated Tribunal member
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gu-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state earlier urgent variation application details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-80
has part: 80(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 80(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84

80(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-80-ss-6
part of: 80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: The nominated Tribunal member may require the applicant to provide information.
description: necessary for the nominated Tribunal member’s proper consideration of the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-80-ss-7
part of: 80 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Applicant must make a written record of the application and give a copy to the nominated Tribunal member.
description: written record and copy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-80-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make a written record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GV Determination of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv
has part: 15GV(1) Determination of application
has part: 15GV(2) Determination of application
has part: 15GV(3) Determination of application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84

15GV(1) Determination of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1
part of: 15GV Determination of application
note: Tribunal member may vary formal authority subject to conditions or refuse application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GV(1) Determination of application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to vary authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GV(2) Determination of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2
part of: 15GV Determination of application
note: Grant variation only under specified conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Tribunal member must satisfy conditions before granting variation
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member...
conclusion text: The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Variation can only be granted before suspected criminal activity begins
premise text: ...that a serious Commonwealth offence or a serious State offence that has a federal aspect...
conclusion text: The variation must occur before the suspected criminal activity begins
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Variation can only be granted if conditions are met
premise text: ...that any unlawful conduct involved in conducting the controlled operation...
conclusion text: The variation must occur before the unlawful conduct begins
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Tribunal member must ensure maximum extent of illicit goods control
premise text: ...that the operation will be conducted in a way that ensures...
conclusion text: The Tribunal member must ensure the maximum extent of illicit goods control
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Tribunal member must ensure reporting requirements are complied with
premise text: ...that the proposed controlled conduct will be capable of being accounted for...
conclusion text: The Tribunal member must ensure reporting requirements are complied with
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GV(3) Determination of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3
part of: 15GV Determination of application
note: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GW Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gw
note: Nominated Tribunal member may vary formal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gw-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gw-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to vary formal authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-82
note: The nominated Tribunal member must prepare and give a written document to the applicant.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The nominated Tribunal member must prepare and give a written document to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-82-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The nominated Tribunal member must prepare and give a written document to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GX Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gx
has part: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
has part: 15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86

15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority
note: Formal authority variation requirements
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specific information
premise text: (1) A variation of a formal authority by a nominated Tribunal member...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: State period of extension
premise text: (f) state the period of the extension.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority
note: Extension period must not exceed 24 months or specified time frames
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Extension period must not exceed 24 months or specified time frames
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GY Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy
has part: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86

15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities
note: Cancel the authority to conduct a controlled operation at any time and for any reason.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the authority to conduct a controlled operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the authority to conduct a controlled operation.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities
note: Principal law enforcement officer may request cancellation of authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-3
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities
note: Cancellation of authority takes effect at specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gy-ss-3-norm

15GZ Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz
has part: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87

15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-1
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities
note: Authorises law enforcement participants to engage in controlled conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities
note: Person authorized to engage in controlled conduct for the period of effect of the authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Person has obligation to engage in controlled conduct.
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority, unless: (a) the authority specifies a shorter period during which the person is so authorised; or (b) the authority is varied to provide that the person is no longer so authorised; or (c) the authority is cancelled before the end of that period.
conclusion text: Person has obligation to engage in controlled conduct for the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities
note: Authority cannot delegate controlled conduct to others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on delegation
premise text: (3) The authority to engage in controlled conduct given to a participant
conclusion text: cannot be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15H Defect in authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15h
note: An application for an authority or variation of an authority is not invalidated by any defect, other than a defect that affects the application, authority or variation in a material part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15h-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15H Defect in authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

84 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-84
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-84-norm

15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ha
has part: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
has part: 15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88

15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
note: Participant in controlled operation must comply with Commonwealth/State law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
note: Participant must comply with authority to conduct controlled operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Participant must comply.
premise text: (a) the participant engages in the conduct in accordance with the authority to conduct the controlled operation;
conclusion text: The participant must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Participant is authorized to engage in controlled conduct.
premise text: (b) the participant is identified in the authority as a person authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation;
conclusion text: The participant is authorized.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Participant must not induce a Commonwealth offence or an offence under a law of a State or Territory.
premise text: (c) the conduct does not involve the participant intentionally inducing a person to commit a Commonwealth offence or an offence under a law of a State or Territory that the person would not otherwise have intended to commit;
conclusion text: The participant must not induce.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Participant must not engage in conduct likely to cause death or serious injury.
premise text: (d) the conduct does not involve the participant engaging in any conduct that is likely to: (i) cause the death of, or serious injury to, any person; or (ii) involve the commission of a sexual offence against any person;
conclusion text: The participant must not engage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Participant must act in accordance with law enforcement officer instructions.
premise text: (e) if the participant is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.
conclusion text: The participant must act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hb
note: The Commonwealth must indemnify a participant in a controlled operation against any civil liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify a participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HC Effect of sections 15HA and 15HB on other laws relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hc
note: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hc-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During criminal investigation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-86
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-86-norm

15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd
has part: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90

15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Continue to apply despite variation in authority scope
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Continues to apply despite variation
premise text: (1) If an authority...
conclusion text: ...this Part continues...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
logic summary: Continue if unaware of variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation;
conclusion text: ...for so long as the participant:...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Continuity
logic summary: Continues to apply despite variation in temporal scope
premise text: (1) If an authority...
conclusion text: ...this Part continues...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Variation in authority scope does not affect obligation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation;
conclusion text: ...for so long as the participant:...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Continue to apply despite cancellation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continue to apply despite cancellation
premise text: (2) If an authority...
conclusion text: ...this Part continues...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
logic summary: Continue if unaware of cancellation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the cancellation;
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continue despite cancellation
premise text: (2) If an authority to conduct a controlled operation is cancelled...
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Counter cancellation of authority
premise text: (a) is unaware of the cancellation;
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Be aware of substantial risk that authority has not been varied or cancelled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to be aware of risk
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Knowledge of risk is required
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he
has part: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HE(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90

15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he-ss-1
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Belief of innocence from ancillary conduct excused criminal responsibility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excusal
logic summary: Belief of innocence from ancillary conduct excused criminal responsibility
premise text: Belief in innocence
conclusion text: No criminal responsibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between belief and ancillary conduct
premise text: Belief in innocence
conclusion text: No criminal responsibility
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HE(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Definition of ancillary offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HE(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines ancillary offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15he-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hf
has part: 15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
has part: 15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91

15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
note: Compensation for property loss or serious damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-2
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hf-ss-2-norm

15HG Notification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hg
note: Notification requirements for loss of or damage to property and personal injury during controlled operations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HG Notification requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to notify in certain circumstances.
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for notification.
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for notification.
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to notify.
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hg-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents the obligation as a knowledge representation.
premise text: (1) If any loss of or serious damage to property occurs...
conclusion text: ...ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88
has part: 88(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 88(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92

88(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Chief officer must notify owner of reported loss or damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to notify
premise text: Chief officer receives report of loss or damage
conclusion text: Chief officer notifies owner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Chief officer must notify person of reported injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
premise text: Chief officer notified
conclusion text: Person notified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-4
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Notification requirements for chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
premise text: (a) compromise or hinder the controlled operation or any related investigation;
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
premise text: (b) compromise the identity of a participant in the controlled operation;
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
premise text: (c) endanger the life or safety of any person;
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
premise text: (d) prejudice any legal proceeding;
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Chief officer must not give notification until certain conditions are met
premise text: (e) otherwise be contrary to the public interest;
conclusion text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification under subsection (2) or (3);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-88-ss-5
part of: 88 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Delegation of powers and functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-88-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
logic summary: Power delegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh
has part: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93

15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
note: Participant in a Commonwealth operation must comply with the law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a participant in an operation authorised under a corresponding State controlled operations law if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal relationship between participant engagement and operation.
premise text: (b) engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
note: Participant must act in accordance with instructions of law enforcement officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to act in accordance with instructions.
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.
conclusion text: The participant must act in accordance with the instructions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Participant's actions overlap with law enforcement officer's instructions.
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.
conclusion text: The participant's actions overlap with the law enforcement officer's instructions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Participant's actions imply compliance with instructions.
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.
conclusion text: The participant's actions imply compliance with the instructions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Participant's actions diffuse to other participants.
premise text: (d) if the person is a civilian participant in the operation—he or she acts in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.
conclusion text: The participant's actions diffuse to other participants.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-3
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
note: Same meanings as in corresponding State controlled operations law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hh-ss-3-norm

15HI Effect of section 15HH on other laws relating to criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hi
note: Section 15HH does not apply to certain laws relating to criminal investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HI Effect of section 15HH on other laws relating to criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excluded By
logic summary: Excluded from section 15HH
premise text: Section 15HH
conclusion text: Not applicable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-90
note: List of prohibited actions for criminal investigation powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
premise text: (b) searches of individuals;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits entry onto, or searches or inspection of, premises
premise text: (c) entry onto, or searches or inspection of, premises;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits searches, inspections or seizures of other property
premise text: (d) searches, inspections or seizures of other property;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits forensic procedure
premise text: (e) forensic procedure;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits electronic surveillance devices or telecommunications interception
premise text: (f) electronic surveillance devices or telecommunications interception;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-90-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits identification procedures
premise text: (g) identification procedures;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj
has part: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HJ(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94

15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Belief of authorized conduct protects against ancillary offense
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Believes
logic summary: Belief of authorized conduct
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth, the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible for the ancillary offence if, at the time the person engaged in the ancillary conduct, he or she believed the related conduct was being engaged in, or would be engaged in, by a participant in an operation authorised under a corresponding State controlled operations law.
conclusion text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth, the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible for the ancillary offence if, at the time the person engaged in the ancillary conduct, he or she believed the related conduct was being engaged in, or would be engaged in, by a participant in an operation authorised under a corresponding State controlled operations law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HJ(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-3
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Same meanings as in corresponding State controlled operations law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hj-ss-3-norm

15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk
has part: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(2) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(3) Unauthorised disclosure of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94

15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
note: Disclosing controlled operation information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of controlled operation information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HK(2) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HK(2) Unauthorised disclosure of information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HK(3) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
note: Disclosure of information to Ombudsman or Integrity Commissioner is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted for disclosure under specified conditions.
premise text: discloser informs the person to whom the disclosure is made of the discloser’s identity before making the disclosure
conclusion text: Disclosure permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hk-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justification for permissible disclosure under specified conditions.
premise text: discloser makes the disclosure in good faith
conclusion text: Good faith justification provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15HL Unauthorised disclosure of information—endangering safety,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hl
note: Unauthorised disclosure of information—endangering safety
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HL Unauthorised disclosure of information—endangering safety,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information endangering safety
premise text: Disclosing information relating to a controlled operation
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-92
has part: 92(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 92(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 92(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96

92(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-92-ss-2
part of: 92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosure exemptions for law enforcement agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from disclosure obligations
premise text: Disclosure is not required for certain purposes
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted under these conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between disclosure and law enforcement activities
premise text: Disclosure is related to law enforcement activities during certain periods
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted during these periods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-92-ss-3
part of: 92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-92-ss-4
part of: 92 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: An offence against this section is an indictable offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-92-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Indictable offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hm
has part: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
has part: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.97

15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
note: Chief officers must submit reports to the Ombudsman.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
note: Report must include specific details about formal authorities and applications.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Report must include specific details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-94
has part: 94(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 94(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 94(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98

94(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a
part of: 94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Identify law enforcement agencies and individuals with possession of narcotic goods.
description: Information about the controlled operation, including possession of illicit goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b
part of: 94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Identify law enforcement agency or person with possession of narcotic goods.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to identify law enforcement agency or person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c
part of: 94 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Disclosing identity may endanger safety or prejudice investigation/prosecution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of identity under certain conditions.
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for disclosure of identity.
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for disclosure of identity.
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about disclosure of identity.
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-94-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about disclosure of identity.
premise text: (2C) If the chief officer of the authorising agency is of the view...
conclusion text: then the person is sufficiently identified for the purposes of paragraphs (2A)(b) and (2B)(b)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-96
has part: 96(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 96(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 96(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100

96(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-96-ss-3
part of: 96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: The Ombudsman may require additional information from an authorising agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to provide additional information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-96-ss-4
part of: 96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: No obligation to provide particulars of a controlled operation for 6 months if not completed during that period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-4-norm

96(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-96-ss-5
part of: 96 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Must provide a copy of the report to the Minister at the same time as it is given to the Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn
has part: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(4) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(5) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(6) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
has part: 15HN(7) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100

15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
note: Chief officers must submit annual reports to the Minister and Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide annual reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
note: Chief officers must advise the Minister of information to be excluded from reports.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Chief officers must advise the Minister.
premise text: chief officer has a duty to advise the Minister.
conclusion text: The chief officer must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
note: Minister must exclude information from report on chief officer's advice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Minister has a duty to exclude information from report.
premise text: Chief officer advises Minister to exclude information.
conclusion text: Minister must exclude information from report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(4) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
note: Report cannot disclose information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Report must not disclose information
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(5) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
note: Annual reports must include particulars of a controlled operation when completed.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HN(5) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(6) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
note: Must send copy of report to State or Territory Minister with responsibility for corresponding law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to send copy of report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(7) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
note: Must provide report to Ombudsman at the same time as Minister.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HN(7) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister and Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hn-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide report to Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ho
has part: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.101

15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman must prepare and provide reports to the Minister and ACC.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.101
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must not include sensitive information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.101
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on reporting sensitive information
premise text: (2) A report under this section...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-98
has part: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 98(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102

98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-3
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Minister must lay report before Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-4
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Agency must provide comments on report comprehensiveness and adequacy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide comments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-5
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Prohibition on disclosing information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-6
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Particulars of a controlled operation must be included in a report for the year in which the operation is completed.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide particulars of a controlled operation in the report for the year it is completed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-98-ss-7
part of: 98 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Must send copy of report to State or Territory Minister with responsibility for corresponding law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to send copy of report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hp
note: The chief officer of an authorising agency must keep certain documents.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The chief officer of an authorising agency must keep certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HQ General register
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hq
has part: 15HQ(1) General register
has part: 15HQ(2) General register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.103

15HQ(1) General register
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1
part of: 15HQ General register
note: Chief officer must cause a general register to be kept.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HQ(1) General register
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HQ(2) General register
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2
part of: 15HQ General register
note: Specify general register details for applications and authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HQ(2) General register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify details
premise text: (2) The general register is to specify:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Specify date range for applications and authorities
premise text: (i) the date of the application; and (ii) whether the application was formal or urgent;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Specify authority details with recursive relation
premise text: (b) for each authority under this Part granted by an authorising officer of the agency:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify authority details
premise text: (ii) whether the authority was formal or urgent; and (iii) the name and rank or position of the person who granted the authority;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify authority details
premise text: (iv) each serious Commonwealth offence or serious State offence that has a federal aspect in respect of which controlled conduct under the authority was to be engaged in;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-100
has part: 100(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104

100(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Law enforcement agencies and individuals must report possession of narcotic goods.
description: Information about possession of narcotic goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2A) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report possession of narcotic goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Identify the law enforcement agency of which the person is an officer if they are a law enforcement officer.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2B) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must identify the law enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Identifying a person by assumed name or code is permitted if it can be matched to the person's identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2C) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Identifying a person by assumed name or code is permitted if it can be matched to the person's identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-100-ss-3
part of: 100 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A register kept under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: A register kept under this section is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hr
has part: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
has part: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.105

15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
note: The Ombudsman may appoint members of the Ombudsman’s staff to be inspecting officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
note: Appointment under subsection (1) must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide written appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-102
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-102-norm

15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs
has part: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(2) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(4) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(5) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106

15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of authorising agencies at least once every 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HS(2) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of the ACC every 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HS(2) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may require
logic summary: Permission to request staff information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HS(4) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
note: Chief officer must assist Ombudsman with records inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HS(5) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
note: No obligation to inspect records not completed at the time of inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HS(5) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excluding incomplete records from inspection.
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
logic summary: Incomplete records and inspection are disjoint temporal intervals.
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: No trace between incomplete records and inspection.
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
logic summary: No diffusion from incomplete records to inspection.
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hs-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: none
logic summary: No cognitive processing required for incomplete records and inspection.
premise text: (5) Nothing in this section requires the Ombudsman to inspect records relating to operations that have not been completed at the time of the inspection.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht
has part: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107

15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: Ombudsman can compel law enforcement officer to provide relevant information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require law enforcement officers to provide information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: The Ombudsman may require law enforcement officers to provide information.
conclusion text: Law enforcement officers must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Time period for providing information
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman at a specified place and within a specified period.
conclusion text: The time period is between the specified place and the deadline.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Time interval for providing information
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman at a specified place and within a specified period.
conclusion text: The time interval is between the specified place and the deadline.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Information dissemination
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman.
conclusion text: The information is disseminated from the law enforcement officer to the Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: The Ombudsman requires law enforcement officers to give the information to the Ombudsman.
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence system is applied to process the information from the law enforcement officer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require a law enforcement officer to attend an inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The Ombudsman may require the officer to attend.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require a chief officer to attend an inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Chief officer must attend within a specified period or time
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (e) within a specified period or at a specified time on a specified day;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Chief officer must answer questions relevant to the inspection
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (c) before a specified inspecting officer; and ... (d) at a specified place;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
logic summary: Ombudsman may require chief officer to attend inspection
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (b) does not know the officer’s identity;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: Chief officer has authority to attend inspection
premise text: (4) If the Ombudsman: ... (a) has reasonable grounds to believe that a law enforcement officer of a particular law enforcement agency is able to give information relevant to an inspection.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: Requirement for reasonable time and day in information requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory requirement
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-104-norm

15HU Offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hu
note: Refusal to attend before an inspecting officer is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HU Offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to attend
premise text: Section 15HT requires attendance
conclusion text: Refusal is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv
has part: 15HV(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(5) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 15HV(6) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108

15HV(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Must provide information despite other laws or public interest concerns.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HV(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HV(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Ombudsman must provide information and access despite other circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HV(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HV(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Agency must provide information and access to inspecting officer for inspection purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Agency permits inspecting officer access to records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HV(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Agency officer must provide information to a person despite other laws.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HV(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency officer must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HV(5) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Ombudsman must be given information and access despite other provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HV(5) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HV(6) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Ombudsman must be given prescribed authority information and access.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HV(6) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hv-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hw
has part: 15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.109

15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
note: Definition of State or Territory agency and inspecting authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has part
logic summary: Definition of State or Territory agency and inspecting authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
note: Ombudsman must provide information about State or Territory agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-106
has part: 106(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 106(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110

106(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-106-ss-3
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Ombudsman must give information to authority under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-106-ss-4
part of: 106 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Ombudsman may receive information from State or Territory inspecting authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-106-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: receives
logic summary: Receiving obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hx
has part: 15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110

15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-1
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
note: Delegation of powers to APS employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-1-norm

15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HY Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hy
note: Ombudsman not liable to action for acts done in good faith
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HY Ombudsman not to be sued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: All
logic summary: Obligation applies to all inspecting officers
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Ombudsman's actions overlap with those of other officers
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman's actions are not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Obligation diffuses to other officers
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman's actions are not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hy-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Ombudsman's actions infer non-liability
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith as an inspecting officer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HZ Evidence of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15hz
note: A document purporting to be an authority granted under section 15GI is admissible in any legal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HZ Evidence of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Admission of documents as evidence
premise text: Section 15GI
conclusion text: Obligation to admit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j
has part: 15J(1) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
has part: 15J(2) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
has part: 15J(3) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111

15J(1) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1
part of: 15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
note: Authority granted to Customs if illicit goods involved in operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(1) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Authority exists
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Authority exists before operation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15J(2) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2
part of: 15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
note: Notify Chief Executive Officer of Customs of certain information after authority is granted.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(2) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15J(3) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15j-ss-3
part of: 15J Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
note: Failure to comply does not affect authority validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-3-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(3) Chief Executive Officer of Customs to be notified of certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15K Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15k
note: Definitions for Schedule 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15k-norm

108 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-108
note: Acquire an assumed identity, means acquire evidence of the assumed identity and includes taking steps towards acquiring evidence of the identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Acquire an assumed identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-108-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Includes taking steps towards acquiring evidence of the identity.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-110
note: Request for production of evidence of assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-110-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies as obligation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-112
note: Use an assumed identity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits use of assumed identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-112-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies 'use an assumed identity' as a prohibited action.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka
has part: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(5) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116

15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Law enforcement officer may apply for authority to acquire or use assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to do something
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide application
premise text: None
conclusion text: The chief officer of the law enforcement agency must be informed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
premise text: None
conclusion text: The chief officer of the law enforcement agency contains the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authority granted
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...
conclusion text: The chief officer of the agency must grant the requested authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation applied
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...
conclusion text: The authority is granted during the application period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference applied
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...
conclusion text: If the application is made, then the authority must be granted.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Information spread applied
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...
conclusion text: The information about the application spreads to all relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence applied
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority...
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence system recognizes the application as valid.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Separate application required for each assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Separate application is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(5) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity must be in writing and contain specific information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(5) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ka-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-114
note: Chief officer may require additional information from applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 114 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-114-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: consideration
logic summary: Evaluation of application
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb
has part: 15KB(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(2) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(3) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(4) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(5) Determination of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118

15KB(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: Chief officer may grant authority to acquire or use assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KB(1) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) After considering an application...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity may not be granted unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on granting authority to acquire or use assumed identity
premise text: Chief officer must be satisfied on reasonable grounds
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: Supervise acquisition or use of assumed identity by authorised civilian.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to supervise
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...
conclusion text: The chief officer must appoint...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for supervision
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...
conclusion text: The temporal interval for supervision starts at the appointment by the chief officer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Supervision implies appointment
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...
conclusion text: The supervision relation implies an appointment by the chief officer.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Supervision as a diffusion relation
premise text: ...an officer of the law enforcement agency or the intelligence agency...
conclusion text: The supervision relation is a diffusion relation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Supervision as a cognitive action
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted for an authorised civilian...
conclusion text: The supervision relation is a cognitive action.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB(4) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: The officer appointed as supervisor must meet certain qualifications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KB(4) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The officer must meet the specified qualifications.
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the rank of sergeant or an equivalent or higher rank.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The qualifications must be met during the appointment as supervisor.
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the rank of sergeant or an equivalent or higher rank.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The qualifications imply that the officer must meet certain criteria.
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the position, or performs the duties, of a Customs Level 4 officer, or an equivalent or higher position, in Customs.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Must
logic summary: The qualifications must be met by all officers appointed as supervisor.
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the rank of sergeant or an equivalent or higher rank.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Must
logic summary: The qualifications must be met by all officers appointed as supervisor.
premise text: (4) The officer appointed as supervisor...
conclusion text: must be a person who holds the position, or performs the duties, of a Customs Level 4 officer, or an equivalent or higher position, in Customs.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB(5) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: Authorise applications for assumed identities in foreign countries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-116
has part: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 116(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120

116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-116-ss-6
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Authority to use assumed identity in foreign country is conditional on satisfaction of reasonable necessity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Conditional authorization
premise text: Authority to use assumed identity in foreign country is conditional on satisfaction of reasonable necessity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Conditional commencement
premise text: The authority to use the assumed identity in a foreign country is conditional on satisfaction of reasonable necessity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-116-ss-7
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Separate authority required for each assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-7-norm

116(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-116-ss-8
part of: 116 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: An authority is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-116-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: An authority is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: No, an authority is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KC Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc
has part: 15KC(1) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(2) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(3) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(4) Form of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120

15KC(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1
part of: 15KC Form of authority
note: Authority must be in writing and signed by the person granting it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KC(1) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE IN WRITING
logic summary: Authority must be in writing
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SIGNED BY THE PERSON GRANTING IT
logic summary: Authority must be signed by the person granting it
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS ON A CERTAIN DATE
logic summary: Authority starts on a certain date
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: IS RECURRING
logic summary: Authority is recurring
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IS FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE
logic summary: Authority is for a specific purpose
premise text: (1) An authority must be: (a) in writing in the form approved by the chief officer; and (b) signed by the person granting it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15KC(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2
part of: 15KC Form of authority
note: Authority must state certain details
description: Details of assumed identity, evidence, conditions, and officer names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KC(2) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authority must state details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KC(3) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3
part of: 15KC Form of authority
note: Must state issuing agencies and conditions for assumed identity use.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KC(3) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state issuing agencies and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KC(4) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4
part of: 15KC Form of authority
note: Grant of further authorities in relation to an authorised civilian is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant of further authorities in relation to an authorised civilian is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KD Period of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kd
has part: 15KD(1) Period of authority
has part: 15KD(2) Period of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121

15KD(1) Period of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1
part of: 15KD Period of authority
note: Authority remains in force until cancelled under section 15KE.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KD(1) Period of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KD(2) Period of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2
part of: 15KD Period of authority
note: Authority remains in force until specified end date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KD(2) Period of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds authority
premise text: (2) An authority for an authorised civilian...
conclusion text: The authority remains in force until the end of the period specified...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ke
note: Chief officer may vary or cancel authority at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ke-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary or cancel authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-118
has part: 118(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 118(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 118(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 118(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122

118(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-2
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Chief officer must give written notice of variation or cancellation to authorised person and supervisor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-3
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Authority must state reason for variation or cancellation of notice.
description: Reason
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reason
conclusion text: The authority must state the reason for varying or cancelling the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-4
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Variation or cancellation of authority takes effect on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-118-ss-5
part of: 118 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A variation of an authority is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: A variation of an authority is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf
has part: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122

15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Agency must review authority periodically.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to review authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Review authority yearly
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conduct review
premise text: (2) A review of an authority under this section is to be conducted:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for review
premise text: (a) in the case of an authority granted by the chief officer or a delegate of the chief officer of an intelligence agency to an authorised intelligence officer—at least once every 3 years;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring review
premise text: (b) in all other cases—at least once every 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-3
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Determine whether use of assumed identity is still necessary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Cancel authority if necessary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory cancellation
premise text: (4) If the chief officer is satisfied...
conclusion text: he or she must cancel the authority under section 15KE.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Chief officer must record opinion and reasons for using assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer must record opinion and reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate an authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kg
note: Permits law enforcement agencies and intelligence agencies to apply for an order to make entries in registers of births, deaths or marriages.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-cogai-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-shacl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-n3logic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows
premise text: The chief officer of...
conclusion text: ...for an order that an entry be made in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
premise text: The chief officer of...
conclusion text: ...for an order that an entry be made in a register of births, deaths or marriages under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entities involved
premise text: The chief officer of...
conclusion text: ...under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
logic summary: Validates schema compliance
premise text: The chief officer of...
conclusion text: ...under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kg-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Triple pattern matching
logic summary: Matches triple patterns
premise text: The chief officer of...
conclusion text: ...under the relevant law of that jurisdiction in relation to...the acquisition of an assumed identity under an authority or corresponding authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kh
note: Register of births, deaths or marriages must be updated upon authority ceasing to be in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty on the state to update registers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-120
note: Chief officer must apply for order to cancel entry within 28 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki
has part: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124

15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Authority must provide evidence of assumed identity.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must produce evidence of assumed identity.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must state a reasonable period for compliance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
premise text: Request must state a reasonable period for compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must include specific details.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity cannot be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for evidence of assumed identity under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which making a request for evidence of assumed identity is prohibited under this section.
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which making a request for evidence of assumed identity is prohibited under this section.
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition on making a request for evidence of assumed identity under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Uses cognitive AI to prohibit making a request for evidence of assumed identity under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Definition of evidence for assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KJ Government issuing agencies to comply with request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kj
note: Government agency must comply with request within a reasonable period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KJ Government issuing agencies to comply with request
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kk
note: Non-government issuing agencies must comply with requests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide compliance
premise text: Request under section 15KI
conclusion text: Comply with request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kl
has part: 15KL(1) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KL(2) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125

15KL(1) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1
part of: 15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
note: Chief officer must cancel evidence of assumed identity upon written direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KL(1) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KL(2) Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-2
part of: 15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
note: Delete or alter an entry in a record of information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kl-ss-2-norm

15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km
has part: 15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125

15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity ceases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceasing authority
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Obligation ceases
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceasing authority at time of cessation
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Authority ceases at time of cessation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceasing authority over time
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Authority ceases over time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceasing authority at specific point
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Authority ceases at specific point
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceasing authority at time of cessation
premise text: (1) This section applies if an authority for a person to acquire or use an assumed identity ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Authority ceases at time of cessation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
note: Request to return evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
note: Failure to comply with a request for identity information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request
premise text: (a) a request has been made to the person under subsection (2); and (b) the person fails to comply with the request.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with a request
premise text: (b) the person fails to comply with the request.
conclusion text: Penalty: 10 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-122
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-122-norm

15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kn
note: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL exempts officers from criminal liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Request or direction under section 15KI/15KL exempts officers from criminal liability.
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction
conclusion text: No criminal liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL overlaps with the time period of an action.
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction
conclusion text: Action overlaps with request/direction
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL is a recurring trace.
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction
conclusion text: Recurring trace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL propagates to other agents.
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction
conclusion text: Propagated to other agents
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kn-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Request under section 15KI or direction under section 15KL is inferred from other knowledge.
premise text: Section 15KI/15KL request/direction
conclusion text: Inferrable from other knowledge
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ko
has part: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126

15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide indemnity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Commonwealth must indemnify issuing agency or officer for liability incurred in course of duty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency or officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kp
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to acquire or use an assumed identity.
premise text: The person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is in accordance with an authority; and
conclusion text: It is permitted for the person to acquire or use an assumed identity under these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The excerpt describes a temporal interval during which the acquisition or use of an assumed identity is permitted.
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is:
conclusion text: This interval overlaps with the time period during which the person can acquire or use an assumed identity under these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The excerpt describes a recurring pattern of permitted acquisition or use of an assumed identity.
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is:
conclusion text: This pattern repeats for the person who can acquire or use an assumed identity under these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: The excerpt describes a cognitive process related to acquiring or using an assumed identity.
premise text: The person is an authorised civilian and the acquisition or use:
conclusion text: This process recognises the authority of the civilian's supervisor under these conditions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kp-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: The excerpt describes a schema that validates the acquisition or use of an assumed identity.
premise text: The person is an authorised civilian and the acquisition or use:
conclusion text: This schema validates the authority of the civilian's supervisor under these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kq
note: Protection from criminal liability for authorised persons performing their duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to perform duty
premise text: The person is not criminally responsible for the offence if...
conclusion text: The person has an obligation to perform their duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap of duties and offences
premise text: ...in the case of an authorised intelligence officer, an authorised law enforcement officer or an authorised foreign officer—in the course of his or her duty...
conclusion text: The person's duty overlaps with the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of assumed identity on criminal liability
premise text: ...the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with an authority...
conclusion text: The person's assumed identity implies their criminal liability.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations and responsibilities
premise text: ...the thing is done: (i) in the case of an authorised intelligence officer, an authorised law enforcement officer or an authorised foreign officer—in the course of his or her duty...
conclusion text: The obligation diffuses to the person performing their duty.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kq-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: Recognition of artificial agents' obligations
premise text: ...the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with an authority...
conclusion text: The system recognises the person's obligation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kr
note: Protection from criminal liability for third parties performing official duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to protect third parties performing official duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ks
has part: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
has part: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127

15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
note: Authority granted by chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Chief officer has authority to grant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
note: Commonwealth must indemnify authorised persons for liabilities incurred due to their actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth owes an obligation to indemnify authorised persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-124
note: Duty to meet requirements under regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to meet requirements
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Requirements are met during authorized activity
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Requirements are met until authorized activity ends
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-124-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to meet requirements without obligation
premise text: (a) the thing is done in the course of acquiring or using an assumed identity in accordance with the authority; and (b) the thing is done: ...
conclusion text: ...any requirements prescribed under the regulations have been met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15KT Particular qualifications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kt
has part: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications
has part: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128

15KT(1) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-1
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications
note: No sections apply if a particular qualification is needed and the person does not have it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KT(2) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications
note: Prohibits flying a plane if not qualified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits flying a plane.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...
conclusion text: The officer is not authorised to fly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Flying is restricted to qualified individuals.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...
conclusion text: The officer's flying privileges are suspended.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Acquiring a pilot's licence under an assumed identity does not qualify the individual.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...
conclusion text: The officer is not qualified to fly.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: differsFrom
logic summary: Flying without qualification is not permitted.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...
conclusion text: The officer's flying privileges are revoked.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: isInvalid
logic summary: Flying without qualification is an invalid action.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...
conclusion text: The officer's flying privileges are nullified.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku
has part: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128

15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Continue to apply despite variation in authority scope
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continue application despite variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
logic summary: Continue application despite lack of knowledge of variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Counter rebuttal that continuation applies despite variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Authority must inform authorised person of cancellation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Authority has an obligation to inform.
premise text: Authority exists.
conclusion text: Authority must inform.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Authorised person must know about cancellation.
premise text: Authorised person is unaware of cancellation.
conclusion text: Authorised person knows about cancellation.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Reckless disregard for variation or cancellation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: recklessness
logic summary: Disregarding risk due to unjustifiable assumption of authority stability
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: awareness
logic summary: Knowledge of risk implies recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: interval
logic summary: Temporal interval analysis for recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
logic summary: Inferential reasoning for recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relationship analysis for recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: The person is reckless about the existence of the variation or cancellation of an authority or authorisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KV Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv
has part: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129

15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer of an intelligence agency may agree to transfer control of an authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May agree
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer may agree to transfer control of authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
logic summary: Transfer of control is conditional on agreement.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Transfer is conditional on temporal relation.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Transfer is recurring.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Cross-reference
logic summary: Transfer is related to cross-referencing.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
logic summary: Authority is recognized as an entity.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency; or (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency under a previous application of this subsection.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer of originating agency must provide written document to chief officer of receiving agency.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Review of authority must be conducted within a certain timeframe
premise text: (b) whether control of the authority has previously been transferred under this section, and if so:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written document to chief officer of receiving agency
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give the chief officer of the receiving agency a written document setting out:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-126
has part: 126(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 126(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 126(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 126(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130

126(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-4
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Transfer of authority control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Transfer of authority control at a specific time
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-5
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Control of authority not transferred until supervisor appointed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Authority control transfer depends on supervisor appointment.
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-6
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Chief officer must vary authority in accordance with section 15KE.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information about supervisor's name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-126-ss-7
part of: 126 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Control of an authority must not be transferred under this section if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-126-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must_not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw
has part: 15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130

15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-1
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Authority continues to be in force after transfer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain authority
premise text: (2) The authority continues...
conclusion text: The authority must continue.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-3
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions after transfer of control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-3-norm

15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer of the receiving agency must review authority within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide review within specified timeframe.
premise text: Chief officer of the receiving agency must review authority.
conclusion text: Within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Review must occur within specified timeframe after last review or grant.
premise text: The chief officer of the receiving agency must review the authority.
conclusion text: Within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Review must occur within specified timeframe after last review or grant.
premise text: The chief officer of the receiving agency must review the authority.
conclusion text: Within 3 years after last review or 12 months after grant, depending on type of transfer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Review is a necessary action for the chief officer to take.
premise text: The authority has been transferred under subsection 15KV(1) or 15KV(2).
conclusion text: The review must be taken by the chief officer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Review is a cognitive action for the chief officer to take.
premise text: The authority has been transferred under subsection 15KV(1) or 15KV(2).
conclusion text: The review must be taken by the chief officer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-5
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Effect of section 15KL on transfer of control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kw-ss-5-norm

15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kx
has part: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.131

15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-1
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Authority to request evidence from participating jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity from issuing agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: State must provide evidence of assumed identity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-128
has part: 128(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132

128(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-128-ss-3
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Request must state it is a request under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state
conclusion text: Request must state it is a request under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-128-ss-4
part of: 128 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Request for entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-128-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky
has part: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132

15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Request for evidence of assumed identity
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval: Request made to chief officer, response within reasonable period
premise text: (c) the request states a reasonable period for compliance with the request
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Agency must comply with request for evidence within a reasonable period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must comply with request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-3
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Exemptions from compliance with requests made under section (1)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kz
has part: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
has part: 15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132

15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
note: Cancel evidence upon written direction from chief officer who authorised the request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of cancelling evidence without written direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
note: Definition of cancel
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: cancel includes delete or alter an entry in a record of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15l
has part: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133

15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity to chief officer of a requesting agency.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Agency must indemnify issuing agency and officers for liability incurred while complying with request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency and officers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15la
has part: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
has part: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133

15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15la-ss-1
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15la-ss-2
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

130 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-130
note: Omit references to State or Territory offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-130-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-130-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LB Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lb
has part: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
has part: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134

15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority or in the course of duty is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;
conclusion text: (c) the acquisition or use is not both: (i) in accordance with an authority; and (ii) in the course of duty;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The person must be an authorised person to acquire or use an assumed identity.
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;
conclusion text: and (c) the acquisition or use is not both: (i) in accordance with an authority; and (ii) in the course of duty;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The person must be reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
premise text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority or in the course of duty is prohibited.
premise text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The penalty for this offence is imprisonment for 2 years.
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority.
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...
conclusion text: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on authorised civilians to acquire or use assumed identities in accordance with authority and supervisor directions.
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...
conclusion text: Authorised civilians must acquire or use assumed identities in accordance with authority and supervisor directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the obligation applies.
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...
conclusion text: The obligation applies to all times after the commencement of this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits reckless behaviour by authorised civilians regarding assumed identities.
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...
conclusion text: Authorised civilians must not be reckless about assumed identities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the supervisor to provide authority and directions for authorised civilians regarding assumed identities.
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...
conclusion text: Supervisors must provide authority and directions for authorised civilians regarding assumed identities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc
has part: 15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134

15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115 Amendments relating to controlled operations, assumed identities and witness identity protection Schedule 3 Main amendments Part 1 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
conclusion text: (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal, that another person has acquired, will acquire, is using or has used an assumed identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited unless specified conditions are met. Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) if the person causes the disclosure of information mentioned in paragraph (1)(c), (2)(c) or (3)(c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the offence.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the offence.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to all agents.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the prohibition as a rule of law.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-4
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: No offence under subsections (1), (2) or (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

132 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-132
note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-132-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld
has part: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136

15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
note: Submit report to Minister with specific information about authorities and assumed identities.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must submit report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Report subject to Minister
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
note: Exclusion of information from report to prevent endangering safety or compromising law enforcement activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents action
premise text: Information should not be made public.
conclusion text: Exclusion is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal intervals of exclusion and report preparation overlap.
premise text: Exclusion must occur before the report is laid before Parliament.
conclusion text: Temporal relationship established.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
note: Must exclude information from report if advised by chief officer.
description: Copy of report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15le
note: Chief officer of an intelligence agency must submit a report to the Inspector-General.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer must submit a report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Report includes specific information about authorities and activities.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-134
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-134-norm

15LF Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf
has part: 15LF(1) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(2) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(3) Record keeping
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138

15LF(1) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1
part of: 15LF Record keeping
note: Agency must keep records about operation of Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LF(1) Record keeping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has a duty to keep records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LF(2) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2
part of: 15LF Record keeping
note: Records must be kept of authority grants, variations, and cancellations.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LF(2) Record keeping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LF(3) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3
part of: 15LF Record keeping
note: Records must be kept for authorities transferred to or from the chief officer of an agency.
description: (a) names of chief officers, (b) names of agencies, (c) date of transfer, and (d) dates and names of previous transfers if applicable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LF(3) Record keeping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
conclusion text: (a) names of chief officers, (b) names of agencies, (c) date of transfer, and (d) dates and names of previous transfers if applicable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for record keeping
conclusion text: (c) date of transfer
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LG Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg
has part: 15LG(1) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(2) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(3) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(4) Audit of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139

15LG(1) Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1
part of: 15LG Audit of records
note: Chief officer must audit records every 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LG(1) Audit of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Chief officer must cause records to be audited.
conclusion text: Records must be audited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LG(2) Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2
part of: 15LG Audit of records
note: The audit must be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LG(2) Audit of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The audit must be conducted.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: The audit must be conducted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: BY
logic summary: Conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: The person appointed by the chief officer conducts the audit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for conducting the audit.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: The audit is conducted within a certain temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Conducting the audit implies appointing a person.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: Appointing a person implies conducting the audit.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Diffusion of responsibility for auditing records.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: The chief officer is responsible for auditing records.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LG(3) Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3
part of: 15LG Audit of records
note: The person conducting the audit must not be a certain type of person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LG(3) Audit of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The person conducting the audit must not be...
conclusion text: ...a certain type of person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The person conducting the audit must not be...
conclusion text: ...a certain type of person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LG(4) Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4
part of: 15LG Audit of records
note: Audit results must be reported to the chief officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LG(4) Audit of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to report audit results
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lh
has part: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
has part: 15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139

15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
note: Functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Delegation is excluded from the scope of this section during its effective period
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Delegation is excluded from the scope of this section until it is revoked or superseded
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not Diffused
logic summary: Delegation is not diffused from the scope of this section
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-2
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
note: Delegation of chief officer's functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15lh-ss-2-norm

136 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-136
note: Defines senior officer positions across various agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies senior officers by agency and position.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-136-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines the scope of senior officer positions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15M Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15m
note: Definitions for Schedule 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15m-norm

138 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-138
note: Defines terms related to witness identity protection certificates and court proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-138-norm

15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ma
has part: 15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
has part: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.143

15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
note: Defines criminal proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: criminal proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Describes the meaning of criminal proceeding
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Establishes a definition
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has temporal relation
logic summary: Describes the timing of criminal proceeding
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: has temporal relation
logic summary: Describes the timing of criminal proceeding
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: has temporal relation
logic summary: Describes the timing of criminal proceeding
conclusion text: (1) In this Part, criminal proceeding means a proceeding for the prosecution, whether summarily or on indictment, of an offence or offences.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
note: Defines what constitutes a criminal proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is part of
logic summary: Identifies components of a criminal proceeding.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a criminal proceeding:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ma-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a criminal proceeding:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-140
note: Restrictions on disclosure of evidence and proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (c) the discovery, exchange, production, inspection or disclosure of intended evidence, documents and reports of persons intended to be called by a party to give evidence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
logic summary: Temporal relationship between restricted activities
premise text: (c) the discovery, exchange, production, inspection or disclosure of intended evidence, documents and reports of persons intended to be called by a party to give evidence;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Restrictions on sentencing proceedings
premise text: (d) a sentencing proceeding;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-140-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
logic summary: Temporal relationship between restricted activities
premise text: (d) a sentencing proceeding;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mb
has part: 15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
has part: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144

15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
note: Defines civil proceeding for the purpose of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding means...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding has a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to ordered or recurring traces.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to duties and prohibitions.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to diffusion of information.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding is defined for this Part.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
note: Defines what constitutes a civil proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes various types of proceedings in the definition.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a civil proceeding:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines when a civil proceeding begins and ends.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a civil proceeding:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mc
note: A charge against a person for an offence is outstanding until it is finally dealt with in one of the following ways.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for charges against a person for an offence.
premise text: (a) a charge against a person for an offence is outstanding until the charge is finally dealt with in any of the following ways:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for allegations of professional misconduct.
premise text: (c) an allegation of professional misconduct against a person is outstanding if the allegation has not been finally dealt with in accordance with the procedures that apply for the purposes of dealing with an allegation of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Charge can be pending until it is finally dealt with.
premise text: (i) the person has been arrested for the offence, unless the person has been later released without being charged with an offence;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Charge can be pending until it is finally dealt with.
premise text: (ii) a summons to appear before a court to answer a charge for the offence has been served on the person;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for charges against a person for an offence.
premise text: (iii) the person is discharged by a court following a committal hearing;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MD Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md
has part: 15MD(1) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(2) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(3) Application of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145

15MD(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1
part of: 15MD Application of Part
note: This Part applies to a proceeding in which an operative is, or may be, required to give evidence obtained as an operative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MD(1) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MD(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2
part of: 15MD Application of Part
note: Protection of evidence in proceedings is unaffected by this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MD(2) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect evidence in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MD(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3
part of: 15MD Application of Part
note: Court control over proceedings is not limited by this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MD(3) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court control over proceedings is not limited by this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ME Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15me
note: Chief officer may give witness identity protection certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15me-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-142
has part: 142(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 142(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146

142(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-2
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries to ascertain required information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries.
conclusion text: Chief officer MUST make reasonable enquiries.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-3
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Chief officer must obtain statutory declaration from operative before issuing certificate.
description: Statutory declaration from operative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide statutory declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-4
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Cannot appeal against, review, quash or invalidate a decision to give a witness identity protection certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of appeal against decision
premise text: Decision is final
conclusion text: Appeal is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-5
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Does not prevent questioning of identity protection certificate in disciplinary proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes exclusion from disciplinary proceedings.
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-6
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A witness identity protection certificate is prima facie evidence of its contents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-ltl-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes as true
logic summary: The certificate is taken to be properly issued.
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):
conclusion text: must be taken to be such a certificate and to have been properly issued;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes as true
logic summary: The certificate is prima facie evidence.
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters in the certificate;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The certificate is valid during a specific time period.
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters in the certificate;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The certificate is valid during a specific time period.
premise text: (6) A witness identity protection certificate purporting to be issued under subsection (1):
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters in the certificate;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

142(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-142-ss-7
part of: 142 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A witness identity protection certificate is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-142-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits witness identity protection certificates from being legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MF Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf
has part: 15MF(1) Statutory declaration by operative
has part: 15MF(2) Statutory declaration by operative
has part: 15MF(3) Statutory declaration by operative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147

15MF(1) Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1
part of: 15MF Statutory declaration by operative
note: Statutory declaration by operative regarding convictions, charges, and credibility
description: particulars of each offence, charge, finding, allegation, comment, representation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Statutory declaration is mandatory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MF(2) Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2
part of: 15MF Statutory declaration by operative
note: No disclosure of statutory declaration made under this section in any proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MF(2) Statutory declaration by operative
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (3), a person cannot be compelled to disclose...
conclusion text: ...in any proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MF(3) Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3
part of: 15MF Statutory declaration by operative
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MF(3) Statutory declaration by operative
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Statutory declaration exemption
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not apply to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-144
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-144-norm

15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mg
has part: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148

15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
note: Witness identity protection certificate requirements
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide witness information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-2
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
note: A witness identity protection certificate for an operative must not contain information that may allow the operative’s identity, or where the operative lives, to be revealed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15MH Filing and notification
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh
has part: 15MH(1) Filing and notification
has part: 15MH(2) Filing and notification
has part: 15MH(3) Filing and notification
has part: 15MH(4) Filing and notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149

15MH(1) Filing and notification
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1
part of: 15MH Filing and notification
note: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MH(1) Filing and notification
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MH(2) Filing and notification
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2
part of: 15MH Filing and notification
note: Provide a copy of the certificate to each party at least 14 days before evidence is given.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MH(2) Filing and notification
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the certificate to each party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATORY KNOWLEDGE
logic summary: The person who files the certificate must know about the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUOUSLY
logic summary: The obligation is continuously present.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MH(3) Filing and notification
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3
part of: 15MH Filing and notification
note: The court may order the person filing the certificate to give a copy of it to a person stated in the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MH(3) Filing and notification
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MH(4) Filing and notification
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-4
part of: 15MH Filing and notification
note: Conditional application of section 15MH(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mh-ss-4-norm

15MI Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mi
has part: 15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
has part: 15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149

15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-1
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance
note: Request for leave to not comply with a requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-1-norm

15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance
note: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply with the requirement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance.
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.
conclusion text: Leave must be refused.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
logic summary: Non-compliance overlaps with situations where leave cannot be given.
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Non-compliance is a recurring trace of situations where leave cannot be given.
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffusesInto
logic summary: Non-compliance diffuses into situations where leave cannot be given.
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Non-compliance is recognized as a situation where leave cannot be given.
premise text: Requirement not reasonably practicable to comply with.
conclusion text: Leave must be refused if non-compliance occurs.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mj
has part: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149

15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
note: Witness identity protection certificate applies in court proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applicability of witness identity protection certificate
premise text: Section applies if a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court.
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: Temporal applicability of section
premise text: Section applies if a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court.
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
note: Witness identity protection: questions about operative's identity or residence must not be asked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of questioning witness about identity or residence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-146
note: Witnesses and persons involved in proceedings cannot disclose operative's identity or location.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 146 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity or location.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-146-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies individuals involved in proceedings as persons who must not disclose operative's identity or location.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk
has part: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(7) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150

15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Court may make order to protect witness identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Court must make order suppressing publication of certain information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to suppress publication
premise text: Court order
conclusion text: Publication suppression
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Court may make order for how transcript is to be dealt with, including suppressing its publication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make order for transcript handling
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an order is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (6) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the conduct contravenes the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Conduct overlaps with prohibited conduct
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Conduct is a recurring trace of prohibited conduct
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Conduct diffuses to prohibited conduct
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Conduct is recognized as prohibited by AI
premise text: (a) an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5); and...
conclusion text: ...the person engages in conduct; ...the conduct contravenes the order.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK(7) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited by subsection (6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(7) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers
conclusion text: The court can still punish for contempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt overlaps with subsection (6)
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt
conclusion text: The two intervals overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt repeats with subsection (6)
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt
conclusion text: The two intervals repeat
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt diffuses with subsection (6)
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt
conclusion text: The two intervals diffuse
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mk-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Subsection (6) recognizes court's power to punish for contempt
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not limit the court’s powers, including, but not limited to, the court’s power to punish for contempt
conclusion text: The two intervals recognize each other
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml
has part: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151

15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity to presiding officer if certificate filed.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose operative's identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
note: The operative must disclose their true identity to the presiding officer.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The operative must disclose their true identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
note: Presiding officer must not record or retain information disclosed under subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of recording information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mm
has part: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151

15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity despite certificate
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Request for leave to ask a question or require a witness to make a statement that may disclose the operative's identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mm-ss-2-norm

148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148
has part: 148(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 148(12) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152

148(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-3
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Definition of 'person involved in the proceeding'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-3-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

148(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-4
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Grant leave for party or lawyer to do anything mentioned in paragraph (2)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-5
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court must be satisfied about evidence before giving leave or making an order regarding operative's credibility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfies
logic summary: Satisfying condition for court action
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered by
logic summary: Temporal ordering of conditions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-6
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Application must be heard in the absence of a jury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to hear application in the absence of a jury.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-7
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court must be closed during proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court closure prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-8
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court must suppress publication of certain information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must prohibit publication.
premise text: (8) The court must make an order suppressing the publication of anything said when...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(9) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-9
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Publication of court transcript is prohibited without court order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: ...but the court may make an order suppressing its publication.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-10
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court may make order to protect operative's identity or prevent disclosure of location.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(10) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-11
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Engaging in conduct that contravenes an order made under subsections (8), (9) or (10) is a crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(11) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that contravenes an order.
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.
conclusion text: The conduct is a crime.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal overlap between the crime and the order.
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.
conclusion text: The crime overlaps with the order in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Defines the repeating nature of the crime.
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.
conclusion text: The crime repeats indefinitely.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-11-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on individuals to comply with the order.
premise text: (11) A person commits an offence if: (a) an order has been made under subsection (8), (9) or (10); and (b) the person engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct contravenes the order.
conclusion text: The individual is obligated to comply with the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(12) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-148-ss-12
part of: 148 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited by subsection (11)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(12) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-148-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court's power to punish for contempt is not limited by subsection (11)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mn
has part: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
has part: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.153

15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-1
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
note: Application for leave—joinder as respondent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
note: Allow person to join application as respondent under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (2) The court...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-150
note: Court must allow person or legal representative to appear and be heard if joined as respondent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must allow appearance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MO Directions to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mo
has part: 15MO(1) Directions to jury
has part: 15MO(2) Directions to jury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154

15MO(1) Directions to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1
part of: 15MO Directions to jury
note: Witness must provide identity protection certificate if operative gives evidence in jury proceeding.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MO(1) Directions to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
conclusion text: The witness must provide the identity protection certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing identity protection certificate
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
conclusion text: The identity protection certificate must be provided between the time the operative gives evidence and the end of the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing identity protection certificate
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
conclusion text: The identity protection certificate must be provided between the time the operative gives evidence and the end of the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: Conditional provision
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
conclusion text: If the conditions are met, the witness must provide the identity protection certificate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classifies operative as someone who gives evidence
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
conclusion text: The operative is someone who gives evidence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MO(2) Directions to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2
part of: 15MO Directions to jury
note: Court must not draw adverse inferences against defendant or another party due to witness identity protection certificate or court order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences.
premise text: Witness identity protection certificate or court order.
conclusion text: No adverse inferences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences against defendant or another party.
premise text: Witness identity protection certificate for the operative.
conclusion text: No adverse inferences against defendant or another party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences due to court order.
premise text: Section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
conclusion text: No adverse inferences due to court order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: NotA
logic summary: Court's power to direct jury is not affected by witness identity protection certificate.
premise text: Section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
conclusion text: Court's power to direct jury unaffected.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MP Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp
has part: 15MP(1) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(2) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(3) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(4) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(5) Appeals and adjournments
has part: 15MP(6) Appeals and adjournments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154

15MP(1) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments
note: Court must give or refuse leave for witness identity protection certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MP(1) Appeals and adjournments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must give or refuse leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MP(2) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments
note: Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals against decisions on leave or orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MP(2) Appeals and adjournments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MP(3) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments
note: Appeal against decision to give or refuse leave, or to make or refuse to make order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MP(3) Appeals and adjournments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can appeal
logic summary: Appeal is allowed.
premise text: State has the power to give or refuse leave.
conclusion text: A party can appeal against the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MP(4) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments
note: Allow operative or chief officer to join appeal if they have a sufficient interest in the decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MP(4) Appeals and adjournments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Allow operative or chief officer to join appeal if they have a sufficient interest in the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MP(5) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments
note: Party may apply for adjournment to appeal against original court's decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MP(5) Appeals and adjournments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MP(6) Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments
note: Original court must grant adjournment if application is made under subsection (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MP(6) Appeals and adjournments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mp-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide adjournment
premise text: Application is made under subsection (5)
conclusion text: Original court must grant adjournment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq
has part: 15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155

15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
note: Chief officer must cancel witness identity protection certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide cancellation
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.
conclusion text: The chief officer must cancel the witness identity protection certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between cancellation and application
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate contains the application of this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between cancellation and application
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate is contained within the application of this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Spread of cancellation information
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate is contained within the diffusion of this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (1) This section applies if the chief officer of a law enforcement agency gives a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding.
conclusion text: The cancellation of the witness identity protection certificate is contained within the artificial intelligence application of this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
note: Cancellation of witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-2-norm

15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
note: Chief officer must give notice to court and parties if certificate is cancelled.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
conclusion text: Chief officer must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-152
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-152-norm

15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr
has part: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156

15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
note: Permission to give information disclosing operative's identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
note: Chief officer may permit person to give information disclosing operative's identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-3
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
note: Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mr-ss-3-norm

15MS Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms
has part: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156

15MS(1) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences
note: Disclosing operative identity without authorization is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing operative identity without authorization.
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding has been given; and (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and cancellation.
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;
conclusion text: The person engages in conduct; and...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure offences.
premise text: (d) the conduct results in the disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;
conclusion text: None of the following applies:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to cancel certificate.
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission for disclosure without authorization.
premise text: (i) the conduct is required by section 15ML;
conclusion text: None of the following applies:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15MS(2) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences
note: Disclosure of operative's identity or where the operative lives is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity or where the operative lives.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (d) the conduct results in the disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct that endangers health or safety.
premise text: (f) the person is reckless as to whether his or her conduct will endanger the health or safety of another person.
conclusion text: ...and (f) the person is reckless as to whether his or her conduct will endanger the health or safety of another person;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity under certain conditions.
premise text: (e) none of the following applies:
conclusion text: ...and (e) none of the following applies:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MS(3) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences
note: Disclosing operative identity or location without authorization is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-154
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-154-norm

15MT Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mt
has part: 15MT(1) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 15MT(2) Evidentiary certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158

15MT(1) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1
part of: 15MT Evidentiary certificates
note: Chief officer must sign certificate stating certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MT(1) Evidentiary certificates
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MT(2) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2
part of: 15MT Evidentiary certificates
note: Certificate is prima facie evidence in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Assertion of a fact
conclusion text: The certificate is prima facie evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu
has part: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158

15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Chief officer must submit report about witness identity protection certificates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Report requirements for witness identity protection certificates
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Prohibition on disclosing witness identity protection certificate information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal reporting restrictions
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal reporting restrictions
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restricts
logic summary: Reporting restrictions
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Restricts
logic summary: Reporting restrictions
premise text: (3) A report must not include information that discloses, or may lead to the disclosure of, an operative’s identity...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Minister must lay report before each House within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MW Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mw
note: Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under corresponding laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mw-norm

156 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-156
note: Prohibition of disclosure of operative's identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-156-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-156-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-156-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of operative's identity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MX Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx
has part: 15MX(1) Delegation
has part: 15MX(2) Delegation
has part: 15MX(3) Delegation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160

15MX(1) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1
part of: 15MX Delegation
note: Delegation of functions is prohibited for chief officers under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MX(1) Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MX(2) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2
part of: 15MX Delegation
note: Delegation of functions to senior officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MX(2) Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Duty on chief officers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MX(3) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3
part of: 15MX Delegation
note: Defines senior officer roles in various agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MX(3) Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Agency-specific definitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has-subclass-of
logic summary: Class hierarchy for senior officers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-158
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-158-norm

11 Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Court discretion not limited by this Part in admitting or excluding evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Relationship to other laws and matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court discretion not limited by this Part in admitting or excluding evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Participant not criminally responsible for Commonwealth offence if conduct was authorized and met certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to comply with conditions.
premise text: The participant engaged in conduct, whether before, on or after commencement, in the course of, and for the purposes of, the operation.
conclusion text: The participant is not criminally responsible if they meet these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The conduct must overlap with the commencement of the operation.
premise text: (1) This item applies to a participant in an operation authorised under a State controlled operations law if:
conclusion text: The conduct must occur before or at the same time as the commencement of the operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The conduct must repeat over time.
premise text: (b) The participant engaged in conduct, whether before, on or after commencement, in the course of, and for the purposes of, the operation;
conclusion text: The conduct must occur repeatedly over time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Participant has permission to engage in conduct if it meets certain conditions.
premise text: (2) Despite any other law of the Commonwealth, the participant is not criminally responsible for the Commonwealth offence, if:
conclusion text: The participant is permitted to engage in conduct that meets these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 Effect of item 12 on other laws relating to criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Item 12 does not apply to certain conduct authorized under Commonwealth or State laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Effect of item 12 on other laws relating to criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

160 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-160
note: List of prohibited actions for criminal investigation powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 160 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
premise text: (b) searches of individuals;
conclusion text: No search of individual.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
premise text: (d) searches, inspections or seizures of other property;
conclusion text: No search or seizure of other property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-160-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
premise text: (f) electronic surveillance devices or telecommunications interception;
conclusion text: No electronic surveillance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect from criminal responsibility
premise text: State must provide protection
conclusion text: Person is not criminally responsible for ancillary conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Evidence of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: A document purporting to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law is admissible in any legal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Evidence of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Admission
logic summary: Admission of the document as evidence in legal proceedings.
premise text: The document purports to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law.
conclusion text: The document is admissible in any legal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Proof
logic summary: Proof of the facts required to grant the authority.
premise text: In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the document is proof in any proceedings.
conclusion text: The person granting the authority was satisfied of the facts they were required to be satisfied of.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of the document's authenticity on its admissibility.
premise text: If the document purports to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law, then it is admissible in any legal proceedings.
conclusion text: The document is admissible in any legal proceedings if it purports to be an authority granted under a State controlled operations law.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Authorization of the person granting the authority.
premise text: The person granting the authority was satisfied of the facts they were required to be satisfied of.
conclusion text: The person granting the authority is authorized to grant the authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Defines commencement and State controlled operations law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-norm

162 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-162
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-162-norm

17 Controlled operations authorised before commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
note: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Controlled operations authorised before commencement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914.
premise text: Repeals and amendments made by this Part do not affect the continued application of the Crimes Act 1914.
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 as if repeals and amendments had not happened.
premise text: Pre-commencement controlled operation is a subclass of the crimes covered by the Crimes Act 1914.
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 during the period of pre-commencement controlled operation.
premise text: The commencement of this item marks the beginning of a new period for which the Crimes Act 1914 does not apply.
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations during that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 during the period of pre-commencement controlled operation.
premise text: The commencement of this item marks the beginning of a new period for which the Crimes Act 1914 does not apply.
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations during that period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continues application of Crimes Act 1914 as if repeals and amendments had not happened.
premise text: The repeal and amendment provisions do not affect the continued application of the Crimes Act 1914.
conclusion text: The Crimes Act 1914 continues to apply after commencement in relation to pre-commencement controlled operations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Controlled operations—continuation of Division 3 of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
note: Continuation of Division 3 of Part IAB despite repeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Controlled operations—continuation of Division 3 of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues in effect as if not repealed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Assumed identities—authorisations taken to be authority
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Assumed identities—authorisations taken to be authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Assumed identities—authorisations taken to be authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional effect of authorisation
premise text: Authorisation was granted under section 15XG
conclusion text: Has effect as if authority granted under section 15KB
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation of authorisation
premise text: Authorisation was granted immediately before commencement
conclusion text: Has effect after commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20 Assumed identities—continuation of old law in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
note: States without corresponding laws: continuation of old law in relation to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Assumed identities—continuation of old law in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues the old law in relation to states without corresponding laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-164
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-164-norm

21 Section 219ZJA (definition of serious Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
note: Definition of serious Commonwealth offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Section 219ZJA (definition of serious Commonwealth
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term 'serious Commonwealth offence'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 11.1(7) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-3
note: Insertion of new sections into the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-3-norm

2 Subsection 11.2(5) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-4
note: Omit 'principal offender', substitute 'other person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-4-norm

3 Subsection 11.2(6) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-3
note: Modify Criminal Code subsection 11.2(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-3-norm

4 After section 11.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-2
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-2-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
note: Joint commission for committing an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166
has part: 166(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
has part: 166(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170

166(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-2
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Offence committed in accordance with the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to commit an offence in accordance with the agreement
premise text: (2) An offence is committed in accordance with the agreement
conclusion text: An offence is committed if it is done in accordance with the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The conduct occurs during the course of carrying out the agreement
premise text: (c) To the extent that a physical element of the joint offence consists of a circumstance—the conduct engaged in, or a result of the conduct engaged in, occurs in that circumstance
conclusion text: The conduct occurs during the course of carrying out the agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-3
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Reckless intention to commit an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Intention to commit an offence is a joint obligation
premise text: The person intends to commit an offence
conclusion text: An offence is committed in the course of carrying out the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint obligation for committing an offence
premise text: Another party commits an offence in the course of carrying out the agreement
conclusion text: An offence is committed in the course of carrying out the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between intention and commission
premise text: The person intends to commit an offence at some point in time
conclusion text: The commission of the joint offence overlaps with the intention to commit an offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace between intention and commission
premise text: The person intends to commit an offence at some point in time
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace between the intention to commit an offence and the commission of the joint offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint obligation for reckless conduct
premise text: The person is reckless about committing an offence
conclusion text: An offence is committed in the course of carrying out the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-4
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Intention to commit an offence is required for guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires intention to commit an offence.
premise text: Person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.
conclusion text: Guilt requires intention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between intention and guilt.
premise text: For a person to be guilty of an offence because of the operation of this section, the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.
conclusion text: Intention occurs during guilt.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between intention and guilt.
premise text: For a person to be guilty of an offence because of the operation of this section, the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.
conclusion text: Intention occurs during guilt.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires intention to commit an offence.
premise text: For a person to be guilty of an offence because of the operation of this section, the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that an offence would be committed under the agreement.
conclusion text: Guilt requires intention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(5) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-5
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Agreement may be entered into before or at the same time as conduct constituting physical elements of joint offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to enter into agreement before or at same time as conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-6
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A person cannot be found guilty of an offence if they terminated their involvement and took reasonable steps to prevent the conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(6) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on being found guilty
premise text: Terminated involvement and prevention steps taken
conclusion text: Guilty verdict not possible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-7
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence despite another party not being prosecuted or present.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(7) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166-ss-8
part of: 166 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
note: Any special liability provisions apply to the joint offence for determining guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(8) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Special liability provisions apply to the joint offence.
premise text: This section applies to the joint offence.
conclusion text: The special liability provisions apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-166-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: Temporal intervals are relevant for determining guilt.
premise text: The operation of this section determines whether a person is guilty.
conclusion text: Temporal intervals are relevant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 11.6(4) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-2
note: Omit certain provisions from the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-2-norm

6 Subsection 14.1(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-2
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-2-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-2
note: Duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 15.1(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-2
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-3
note: Duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDuty
logic summary: Has duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 15.2(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-2
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-4-norm

168 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-168
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-168-norm

9 Subsection 15.3(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-5
note: Duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 15.4 of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: Omit subsection 11.2(1) and substitute with subsections 11.2(1) and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-6
note: Duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-6-norm

11 Subsection 70.5(1) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-7
note: Insertion of new subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-7-norm

12 Paragraph 302.6(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Insert 'or 11.2A' after '11.2'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-norm

14 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
note: Associating with a criminal organisation or member is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.173
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Subsection 5(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of association with a criminal organisation or member.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of association as a crime.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
note: Definition of criminal organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.173
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-norm

16 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
note: Defines member of a criminal organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.173
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Subsection 5(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of key term
premise text: Insert: member, of a criminal organisation, includes:
conclusion text: a director and an officer of the body corporate;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: in the case of an organisation that is a body corporate—a director and an officer of the body corporate;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-170
note: Prohibition on associating with an organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 170 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids association with the organisation
premise text: (i) an associate member or prospective member...
conclusion text: ...of the organisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Combines multiple prohibitions
premise text: (i) an associate member or prospective member...
conclusion text: ...and (ii) a person who identifies himself or herself...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Associating with the organisation is during membership
premise text: (i) an associate member or prospective member...
conclusion text: ...of the organisation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16A After subsection 5D(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16a
note: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16A After subsection 5D(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.
conclusion text: The offence is a serious offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: against
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: against
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: against
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: against
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
premise text: An offence is also a serious offence if it is an offence against section 93T of the Crimes Act 1900 of New South Wales.
conclusion text: The offence occurs before or at the same time as the other offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 At the end of section 5D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
note: An offence is a serious offence if it involves or would involve associating with a criminal organisation, contributing to its activities, aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring the commission of a prescribed offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 At the end of section 5D
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The text states that an offence is a serious offence if it meets certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
note: Conditional commencement of subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18-norm

18A Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18a
note: Declaration of an organisation as a declared organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18A Subsection 5(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a class of organisations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18B Subsection 5(1) (at the end of subparagraphs (c)(i), (ii),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18b
note: Add “or” at the end of subparagraphs (c)(i), (ii) of the definition of permitted purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Add
logic summary: Adding to a set
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18C Subsection 5(1) (at the end of paragraph (c) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18c
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18c-norm

172 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-172
note: Performance of a function or duty under an organised crime control law is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 172 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits performance of a function or duty under an organised crime control law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18D After paragraph 5B(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18d
note: Prohibition on proceedings under or relating to organised crime control laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18d-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18d-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings under or relating to organised crime control laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18E At the end of paragraphs 6L(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18e
note: Add “or” at the end of paragraphs 6L(1)(a), (b) and (c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18e-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18e-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Add
logic summary: Add ‘or’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18F After paragraph 6L(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18f
note: Permission to proceed under an organised crime control law of that State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18f-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18G At the end of paragraph 6L(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18g
note: Add “or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18g-norm

18H After subparagraph 68(d)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18h
note: Subject matter of a proceeding under an organised crime control law of a State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18H After subparagraph 68(d)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18J Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18j
note: Applicability of amendments to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18j-norm

19 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-6
note: Governor-General may make regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.177
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May prescribe matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-7
note: See s. 2(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-7-norm

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-3
note: Schedule 2, item 154: 1 Jan — ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00115
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-serious-and-organised-crime-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed