1 Section 3
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

2 Section 14
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal section 14
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

3 Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3(1) Objects—general
has part: 3(2) Objects—general
has part: 3(3) Objects—general
has part: 3(4) Objects—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

3(1) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Require agencies to publish information and provide a right of access to documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entailment of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: entails

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(1) Objects—general

3(2) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Promote public participation in Government processes and scrutiny of activities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Promote public participation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The Parliament intends...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(2) Objects—general

3(3) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Increase recognition of information held by the Government for public purposes.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(3) Objects—general

3(4) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Parliament intends to facilitate and promote public access to information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(4) Objects—general

3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
has part: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a
schema version: 2

3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Prohibition on publishing or giving access to information or documents apart from under this Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on publishing or giving access to information or documents apart from under this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible

3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: The Parliament does not intend to limit the power of publication or access.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible

6 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Definition of operational information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)

10 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Section applies despite section 8.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Unpublished operational information
has part: 10(2) Unpublished operational information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10(1) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Publishing unpublished operational information is required by the agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must publish unpublished operational information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(1) Unpublished operational information

10(2) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Avoid prejudice from unpublished information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits subjecting person to prejudice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The person must not...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(2) Unpublished operational information

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section imposes obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10A(1) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
has part: 10A(2) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10a
schema version: 2

10A(1) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Function or power given to an agency may be performed by principal officer or authorized officer.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to perform function
modality: Deontic
operator: may

10A(2) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Regulations apply to the performance or exercise of agency functions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations impose obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: regulation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10A(2) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies

12 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Conditional commencement of review process within 5 years after section commencement.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for review process commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

14 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 4(9)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Omit specific phrase from Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘of this Act (other than sections 8 and 93)”.

3 Part II
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Repeal Part and substitute with new provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Saving—unpublished information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17
note: Continues in force certain sections of the Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues in force certain sections of the Freedom of Information Act 1982
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES_IN_FORCE

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Saving—unpublished information

7A Information publication scheme—guide
type: Concept
description: Information about the agency's operations, including operational information.
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: An agency must publish a plan and range of information on its website.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must publish information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7A Information publication scheme—guide

8 Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 8(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 8(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

8(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination by legislative instrument.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

8(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Agency must publish other information held by the agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

8(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Agency must have regard to objects of Act and guidelines when performing functions under this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must have regard to objects of Act and guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

8(1) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
description: Information that must be published
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Agency must prepare a plan showing information to be published.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must prepare a plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?

8(2) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Agency must publish certain information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?

8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
has part: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8a
schema version: 2

8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Agency must provide operational information to the public.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide operational information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Operational information is held by the agency.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?

8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Agency must publish operational information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public using AI-powered tools
modality: CogAI
operator: must be published
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide operational information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public
modality: Diffusion
operator: must be published
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?

8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Agency must ensure information accuracy, completeness, and timeliness.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must ensure information accuracy.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.

8C Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
has part: 8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8c
schema version: 2

8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Publication of exempt matter is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of exempt matter.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions

8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Agency exempt from publishing information under Part if enactment restricts or prohibits publication.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency exempt from publishing information under Part if enactment restricts or prohibits publication.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions

8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d
schema version: 2

8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Publish required or permitted information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Agency must publish information to the public and particular classes of persons or entities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must publish information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Agency must publish information on a website.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Charge applies during reproduction costs or incidental costs
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Charge applies if specific conditions met
modality: CogAI
operator: If-then
premise text: (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for specific reproduction costs, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has permission to impose charge
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Charge applies if person does not directly access information
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-then
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Charge applies until person accesses information directly
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for specific reproduction costs, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Agency must publish details of charge for accessing information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to publish details of charge.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: The Information Commissioner must assist agencies in identifying and preparing required information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8e
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must assist agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to

8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: The Information Commissioner has functions to review and monitor the operation of the information publication scheme.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8f
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions

9 Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: Agency must review information publication scheme annually or within 5 years after last review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must perform review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Review of scheme—by agencies

9A Functions and powers under this Part
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Must have regard to objects of the Act and guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined by this Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a relation between temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of a power

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider objects of the Act and guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
premise text: Objects of this Act

1 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Defines open access period for records
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 January 2018.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Range of years
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-10
schema version: 2

1 January 2019.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Range of years
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-11
schema version: 2

1 January 2020.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-12
schema version: 2

1 January 2021.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Creation year after January 2021.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-13
schema version: 2

1 January in the year that is 21 years after
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Defines open access period for records created in the year after creation year
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-14
schema version: 2

1 January in the year that is 51 years after
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Open access period for Cabinet notebooks created in a specific year.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-15
schema version: 2

1 January 2010.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Range of years for a specific purpose
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-16
schema version: 2

1 January 2011.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: References years 1963, 1964 or 1965
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-17
schema version: 2

1 January 2012.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Range of years for a purpose
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-18
schema version: 2

1 January 2013.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Range of years for a purpose
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-19
schema version: 2

1 January in the year that is 31 years after
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Defines open access period for records created in a certain year.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 January 2014.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Exemptions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-20
schema version: 2

1 January 2015.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Range of years for applicability
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-21
schema version: 2

1 January 2016.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Range of years for applicability
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-22
schema version: 2

1 January 2017.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Range of years for a purpose
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-23
schema version: 2

1 January 2018.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Range of years for certain purposes
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-24
schema version: 2

1 January 2019.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Range of years for a purpose
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-25
schema version: 2

1 January 2020.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-26
schema version: 2

1 January 2021.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Defines a year after creation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-27
schema version: 2

1 January in the year that is 31 years after
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Open access period for Cabinet notebooks created in a specific year.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-28-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-28-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-28
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-28-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal reference to a specific year

1 January 2022.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Open access periods for non-Cabinet notebooks differ from general records and Census information records.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-29
schema version: 2

1 January 2011.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Reference year for certain provisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 January 2012.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Reference to years
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 January 2013.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Reference to years
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 January 2014.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Reference year for certain provisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 January 2015.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Reference year for certain provisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-7
schema version: 2

1 January 2016.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Open access period for records
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-8
schema version: 2

1 January 2017.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Reference to years
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-9
schema version: 2

10 Subsection 4(1) (definition of edited copy)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Repeals definition of edited copy and substitutes with a new definition.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Repeal a paragraph and substitute it with a new definition.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal an existing provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of exempt

11A Access to documents on request
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11A(1) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(2) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(3) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(4) Access to documents on request
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a
schema version: 2

11A(1) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Request for access to documents must be made in accordance with subsection 15(2) and any required charge paid.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request is made within a certain timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request must be made within a certain timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Request is made in accordance with subsection 15(2)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access must be given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access to documents upon request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request for access is made in accordance with subsection 15(2)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Charge must be paid
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must pay required charge before access is given
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Any charge that, under the regulations, is required to be paid has been paid

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request is a type of request that can be shared
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Request for access is a type of request that can be shared
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: Request is made by a person, in accordance with subsection 15(2)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request is made within a certain interval of time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Request must be made within a certain interval of time
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Request is made in accordance with subsection 15(2)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A(1) Access to documents on request

11A(2) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Mandatory access—general rule
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General rule for mandatory access
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A(2) Access to documents on request

11A(3) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Agency or Minister must provide access to document upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A(3) Access to documents on request

11A(4) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Agency/Minister not required to provide access to exempt document at a particular time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency/Minister has an obligation to provide access to documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A(4) Access to documents on request

11B Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(5) Public interest exemptions—factors
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b
schema version: 2

11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Public interest exemptions—factors
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Factors favoring access are not limited by this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors

11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Factors that must not be taken into account when deciding access to a document would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluded from consideration
modality: Deontic
operator: excluded
premise text: (4) The following factors must not be taken into account...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors

11B(5) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Agency must consider guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner when determining access to a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11B(5) Public interest exemptions—factors

11C Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Publication of personal or business information is exempt from access under section 11A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11c
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Publication is restricted during reasonable periods.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Publication is controlled through AI-powered moderation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Controlled
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publication of personal or business information is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Publication is restricted through controlled channels.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restricted
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Publication is restricted during recurring periods.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

12 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Condition for running out of review or appeal opportunities
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 At the end of section 4
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Exemptions for foreign governments and international organisations
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide exemptions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: foreign government or an international organisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of exempt entities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Government of the Commonwealth, or an authority of the Commonwealth

14 After section 11
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Insert clause after section 11
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Before section 12
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.25
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Open access period for Cabinet notebooks
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Section 18
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Repeal a section
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in the provision

17 Section 22
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Time limits for applying for reviews of decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Subsections 25(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Omit 'or 33A'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must apply for a review within the time limit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must apply within time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the latest time for applying for an internal review or an IC review in relation to the decision has ended, if the person has not applied for either review;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The internal review and IC review proceedings must be concluded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conclude internal review and IC review proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) if the person has applied for an internal review in relation to the decision: (i) the internal review is concluded; and (ii) the time for applying for an IC review of the decision on internal review has ended, if the person has not applied for the IC review;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The IC review and Federal Court appeal proceedings must be concluded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conclude IC review proceedings and Federal Court appeal proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) if the person has applied for an IC review in relation to the decision: (i) proceedings in relation to the IC review are concluded; and (ii) the time for applying to the Tribunal for a review in relation to the decision has ended, if the person has not applied for such a review; or (iii) the time for instituting an appeal to the Federal Court in relation to the IC review has ended (with no appeal instituted), or, if an appeal has been instituted, all proceedings in relation to the appeal have been concluded;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Tribunal review proceedings and Federal Court appeal proceedings must be concluded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conclude Tribunal review proceedings and Federal Court appeal proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) if the person has applied to the Tribunal for a review in relation to the decision: (i) proceedings in relation to the review are concluded; and (ii) the time for instituting an appeal to the Federal Court in relation to the review by the Tribunal has ended (with no appeal instituted), or, if an appeal has been instituted, all proceedings in relation to the appeal have been concluded.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not apply for an IC review after the internal review is concluded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not apply for IC review after internal review is concluded
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (b) if the person has applied for an internal review in relation to the decision: (i) the internal review is concluded; and (ii) the time for applying for an IC review of the decision on internal review has ended, if the person has not applied for the IC review;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not institute a Federal Court appeal after the IC review is concluded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not institute Federal Court appeal after IC review is concluded
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (c) if the person has applied for an IC review in relation to the decision: (i) proceedings in relation to the IC review are concluded; and (ii) the time for applying to the Tribunal for a review in relation to the decision has ended, if the person has not applied for such a review; or (iii) the time for instituting an appeal to the Federal Court in relation to the IC review has ended (with no appeal instituted), or, if an appeal has been instituted, all proceedings in relation to the appeal have been concluded;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

19 At the end of paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraph 26(1)(a)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 At the end of paragraph 26(1)(a)

2 Subsection 3(7)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Defines open access period for records
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 20(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 After paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Public interest factors must be included in reasons for refusing access to a conditionally exempt document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Public interest factors must be included in reasons for refusing access to a conditionally exempt document.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 After paragraph 26(1)(a)

20(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Access to a conditionally exempt document is prohibited unless access would be in balance with the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of access to a conditionally exempt document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

20(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: No obligation to provide access to exempt documents at a particular time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

21 Sections 26A, 27, 27A and 28
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Repeal sections and substitute with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00866
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.27
note: Agency or Minister may prepare edited copy of document for access under section 11A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the resources available to modify the document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agency or Minister has a temporal interval for preparing edited copy.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to prepare the edited copy, having regard to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: access to the edited copy would be required to be given under section 11A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister permits access to edited copy of document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: it is possible for the agency or Minister to prepare a copy (an edited copy) of the document, modified by deletions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: access to the edited copy would be required to be given under section 11A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister has an obligation to provide access to edited copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: it is not apparent (from the request or from consultation with the applicant) that the applicant would decline access to the edited copy.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the resources available to modify the document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Agency or Minister has a recurring trace of preparing edited copies.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to prepare the edited copy, having regard to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

22 Before section 32
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-3
schema version: 2

22(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c) by legislative instrument.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

22(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: True
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Publish information to the public on a website.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

22(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Charge applies only when accessing through website
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website);

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Charge applies only when accessing through website
modality: CogAI
operator: For
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for a specific reproduction cost, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has permission to impose charge
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Charge is for reimbursement of specific costs
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for a specific reproduction cost, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Charge applies only when accessing through website
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

22(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: charge details
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Agency or Minister must publish charge details for accessing information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must publish charge details.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

22(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Comply with the section within 10 working days after access to a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

22(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Definition of working day
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

23 Section 32
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Insertion of conditional exemption clause after 'exempt documents'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 24(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 24(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 After section 32
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Agency or Minister must provide edited copy to applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide edited copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

24(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Notice must be given to applicant regarding deletions and exemptions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

24(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Agency or Minister must provide notice in writing to applicant upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must provide notice in writing to applicant upon request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

25 At the end of section 33
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: See also subsection 4(10)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Access to document not given until review or appeal opportunities have run out.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Sections 33A to 36
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Review or appeal opportunities must run out before access can be given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet ended.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The agency or Minister must infer that the decision to give access is final after review or appeal opportunities have run out.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet ended.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot give access to document until review or appeal opportunities have run out.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet run out.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision to give access may still stand or be confirmed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The decision to give access is diffused through the internal review process.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Internal review process has been initiated.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Access to document will eventually be given if review or appeal opportunities run out.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet ended.

26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a
schema version: 2

26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Request for access to document must be made if arrangements have been entered into between the Commonwealth and a State about consultation under this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for access to document must be made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Consultation required before granting access to document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of decision without consultation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Decision to give access

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29
note: Agency/Minister must give written notice of decision to State and Applicant after consultation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency/Minister must give written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

27 Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27(1) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(2) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(3) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(4) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(5) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(6) Consultation—business documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
schema version: 2

27 Sections 39, 40 and 41
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Repeal sections
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-2
schema version: 2

27(1) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Agency or Minister must consult with the person concerned before granting access to a document containing business information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consult with the person concerned.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(1) Consultation—business documents

27(2) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Must provide information about business or professional affairs.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(2) Consultation—business documents

27(3) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Agency must consider certain matters when determining exemption contention.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(3) Consultation—business documents

27(4) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
description: Submissions in support of exemption contention
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Agency must consult with person or organisation before granting access to document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take action before granting access.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(4) Consultation—business documents

27(5) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Agency must give person or organisation a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must give person or organisation a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(5) Consultation—business documents

27(6) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Time limits for processing requests
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
has part: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
has part: 27A(3) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a
schema version: 2

27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Agency must consult with the person concerned before granting access to a document containing personal information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation is required before granting access.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consultation must occur before granting access to the document.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Granting access to a document containing personal information.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must consult with the person concerned.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request for access to a document containing personal information.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters when determining whether to grant an exemption.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

27A(3) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Agency must consult applicant before granting access to document
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consult applicant first
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory consultation requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Agency decision to grant access

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(3) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

28 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 28(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Subsection 42(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(2) Subsection 42(2)
has part: 28(3) Subsection 42(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28(2) Subsection 42(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Waiver of legal professional privilege claim
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Subsection 42(2)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Releasing a claim
modality: Deontic
operator: Waive

28(3) Subsection 42(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Document containing operational information is not exempt under subsection (1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Subsection 42(2)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is not exempt under subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Document is exempt under subsection (1)

28(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Written notice must be given to the person and applicant before access is granted.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access not to be given until review or appeal opportunities have run out
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timing of written notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access will not be given until review or appeal opportunities have run out
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of written notice on access
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of written notice by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of written notice
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,

28(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Refusal to provide access to document without review or appeal
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Review or appeal opportunities must overlap with decision to give access to document
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision to give access to document is subject to these reviews
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Document access decision is subject to internal review and review by the Information Commissioner
modality: CogAI
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Internal review (Part VI) and review by the Information Commissioner (see Note 1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister cannot give access to document without review or appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Access to document is granted until review or appeal opportunities are exhausted
modality: Diffusion
operator: Until
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Access to document is granted until review or appeal opportunities are exhausted
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out

29 Sections 43, 43A and 44
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Repeal sections
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 22A(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Substitute table for determining open access period of Cabinet notebooks
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 30(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 30(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 Subsection 45(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Substitute a document to which subsection 47C(1) applies with a document that would apply but for subsections 47C(2) or (3).
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace a document with another that meets certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
premise text: None

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Subsection 45(2)

30(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Agency must give person a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must give person a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

30(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Written notice must be given to the person concerned and the applicant before access is granted.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

30(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Cannot give access to document after review or appeal opportunities have run out.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Review and appeal opportunities have run out
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Review and appeal opportunities have run out
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Review and appeal opportunities for the person concerned started before this point

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No access to document
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot give access to document
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Agency or Minister must not give access to document

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No access to document
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot give access to document after review or appeal opportunities have run out
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
premise text: Agency or Minister must not give access to document unless review and appeal opportunities have run out

31 December):
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Record must be in open access period on and after the specified day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
schema version: 2

31 December):
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Open access period after a specified day
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-2
schema version: 2

31 December):
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Cabinet notebook must be in open access after a certain year.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: After a certain year, it must be in the open access period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Cabinet notebook is in the open access period.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 December):

31 December):
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Cabinet notebook open access period
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-4
schema version: 2

31 Subsection 45(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Insertion of phrase after certain words
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide open access to records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The record is in the open access period on and after the specified day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 December):

31A Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.35
note: Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents is not required.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: A document is exempt if it meets certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part

32 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Access to edited copy of exempt document must be given.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Section 47
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting access to edited copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

33 At the end of Part IV
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Exemptions added at the end of Part IV
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
schema version: 2

34 Cabinet documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) Cabinet documents
has part: 34(2) Cabinet documents
has part: 34(3) Cabinet documents
has part: 34(4) Cabinet documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 34(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

34(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: A document by which a decision of the Cabinet is officially published is not an exempt document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document must be published officially.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

34(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Disclosure of factual information is not exempt if it reveals a Cabinet deliberation or decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose factual information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

34 Schedule 4
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Substitute Section 47H for Section 43A in Schedule 4.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Substitution
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBST

34(1) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: A document is exempt if it was submitted to the Cabinet for consideration or proposed by a Minister to be so.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Cabinet documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts documents submitted to the Cabinet for consideration.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(1) Cabinet documents

34(2) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: A document is exempt to the extent it contains an extract from a related document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Cabinet documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it contains an extract from a related document.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption based on content
modality: Deontic
operator: contains
premise text: Document is exempt if it contains an extract from a related document.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.

34(3) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: Disclose Cabinet deliberations or decisions unless officially disclosed.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Cabinet documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose Cabinet deliberations or decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(3) Cabinet documents

34(4) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
note: A document is not exempt only because it is attached to an exempt document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Cabinet documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(4) Cabinet documents

35 Paragraph 33(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Maintain confidentiality of certain information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain confidentiality.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 Paragraph 33(1)(b)

36 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 Paragraph 50A(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Repeal of public access to confidential information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on public access
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Paragraph 50A(2)(b)

37 Paragraph 50A(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Maintain confidentiality of information under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The public access date must overlap with the communication date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires overlap between the communication date and the public access date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information is inferred to be confidential.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires inference of confidentiality based on the communication and advice from the foreign entity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Do not make the information publicly available.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making confidential information publicly available.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information must be contained within the Commonwealth entity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires containment of information within the Commonwealth entity.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Containment
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information is validated to be classified as confidential.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates the classification of information as confidential based on its origin and advice from the foreign entity.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.

38 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 Subsection 34(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Omit “or 33A,”.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of “or 33A,”.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

39 Application—Part 2
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Amendment applies in relation to FOIA requests received at or after commencement.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Substitute 15 years for 25 years.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 40(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 40(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 40(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Application—items 35, 36 and 37
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.49
note: Amendments apply for determining access to records
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply for determining access to records
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Application—items 35, 36 and 37

40(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Exemption from Freedom of Information Act for trade secrets and other information under section 47.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Trade secrets and other information under section 47 overlap with the Freedom of Information Act.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The CogAI recognizes the exemption for trade secrets and other information under section 47 in the Freedom of Information Act.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts trade secrets and other information under section 47 from Freedom of Information Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The exemption for trade secrets and other information under section 47 diffuses into the Freedom of Information Act.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Trade secrets and other information under section 47 overlap with the Freedom of Information Act.
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.

40(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Exemption from FOI request based on business or financial affairs of the requester's undertaking or organisation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requester's business or financial affairs overlap with document content.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (a) by reason only of the inclusion in the document of information concerning that person in respect of his or her business or professional affairs:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requester's business or financial affairs overlap with document content.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (b) by reason only of the inclusion in the document of information concerning the business, commercial or financial affairs of an undertaking where the person making the request is the proprietor of the undertaking or a person acting on behalf of the proprietor:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requester's business or financial affairs exempt from FOI request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not have effect in relation to a request by a person for access to a document:

40(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Definition of undertaking for Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of undertaking includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of undertaking includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of undertaking
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.

40(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Must provide access to information concerning a person's status as a member of a profession, except in cases where it would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

42 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
schema version: 2

44 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-44
schema version: 2

46 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-46
schema version: 2

47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Disclosures of trade secrets or commercially valuable information are exempt.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to keep trade secrets or commercially valuable information confidential.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain types of requests
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Reference to an undertaking carried on by the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Conditional exemptions for documents that may damage relations between the Commonwealth and a State.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional exemptions apply to documents that overlap with this interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: disclosure of the document under this Act:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may damage relations between the Commonwealth and a State.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect relations between the Commonwealth and a State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Disclosure of the document under this Act:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on divulging confidential information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: would divulge information or matter communicated in confidence by or on behalf of the Government of a State or an authority of a State, to the Government of the Commonwealth, to an authority of the Commonwealth or to a person receiving the communication on behalf of the Commonwealth or of an authority of the Commonwealth.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State

47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47C(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
has part: 47C(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
has part: 47C(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c
schema version: 2

47C(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Conditional exemptions for deliberative processes
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes

47C(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Agency must publish operational information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publishing is required
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47C(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes

47C(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Exemptions from the public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from the public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47C(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes

47D Public interest conditional exemptions—financial or property
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Conditional exemptions for documents with substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47d
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for conditional exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Disclosure under this Act would have substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests if disclosure is made within a certain time period

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to AI systems for conditional exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would have substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation to access conditionally exempt documents with public interest exception
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to access control for conditionally exempt documents
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines trace for conditionally exempt documents
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would have substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests

47E Public interest conditional exemptions—certain operations of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Conditional exemptions for certain operations of agencies
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47e
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prejudice the effectiveness of procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(4) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(5) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(6) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(7) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f
schema version: 2

47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Disclosure of personal information without consent is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Discloses personal information may be uncertain.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Uncertainty

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditionally exempt from disclosure.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters when determining whether disclosure of document would involve unreasonable disclosure of personal information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a CogAI.
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a diffusion.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

47F(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Request for access to a document does not trigger subsection (1) effect
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

47F(4) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Disclosure of personal information may be prohibited if it is detrimental to the applicant's physical or mental health, or well-being.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires overlap between disclosure and potential harm to the applicant.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires analysis of potential harm to the applicant by a qualified person.
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires containment of potential harm to the applicant within a specific scope.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Containment
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of potential harm to the applicant.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.

47F(5) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Access to document may be given to qualified person nominated by applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access granted to qualified person
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Minister may direct access to document

47F(6) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Conditional exercise of agency powers
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

47F(7) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Definition of qualified person for conditional exemptions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of qualified person for conditional exemptions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: qualified person is defined by occupation and profession
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: None

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47F(7) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.43
note: Conditional exemptions for business information disclosure
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47g
schema version: 2

47H Public interest conditional exemptions—research
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Conditional exemptions for research documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47h
schema version: 2

47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j
schema version: 2

47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Conditional exemptions for documents that could have a substantial adverse effect on the economy.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for conditional exemptions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inferential reasoning for conditional exemptions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Infer
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies documents as conditionally exempt based on economic impact.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about conditional exemptions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for conditional exemptions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Substantial adverse effect on the economy of a particular region of Australia
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Must provide access to conditionally exempt documents unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) currency or exchange rates; (b) interest rates;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for exemptions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: documents containing matter relating to any of the following:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless it would be contrary to the public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (e) foreign investment in Australia;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for exemptions
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
premise text: documents containing matter relating to any of the following:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

5 Paragraph 27(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Omit '25 years', substitute '15 years'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 30(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Substitute 15 years for 25 years.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Defines Cabinet committee
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Cabinet notebook)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Substitute notes with a condition
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
note: Access must be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory access
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Subsection 4(1)

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Defines access grant decision term
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)

10 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Definition of IC review applicant
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: IC review applicant has the meaning given by section 54J.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1)

100 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Investigation of part of complaint not allowed if complaint is frivolous or vexatious.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-100
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of investigation of part of complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Investigation of part of complaint not allowed.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

102 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Investigation procedure
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-102-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-102
schema version: 2

104 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 104(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 104(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-104
schema version: 2

104(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Investigation at a declared place may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigation overlaps with the declared period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Investigation at the place overlaps with a period of time when it may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited for a specific period of time.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigation is classified as prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Attorney-General classifies the investigation as prohibited based on its potential impact on Commonwealth security or defence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: Attorney-General has reason to believe investigation at the place might prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation at the place is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits investigation at a declared place.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigation diffuses to other declared places.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Investigation at the place diffuses to other places where it may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited for diffusion to other places.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigation overlaps with the recurring traces.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Investigation at the place overlaps with a recurring trace of periods when it may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited for recurring periods of time.

104(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Prohibition on entering or investigating a prohibited place without approval.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entry or investigation is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Declaration is in force

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

106 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: The Information Commissioner must permit inspection of a document at any reasonable time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-106
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to permit inspection
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

108 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 108(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 108(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-108
schema version: 2

108(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Immunity from civil proceedings and penalties for certain actions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-108-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 108 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then: (a) civil proceedings do not lie against a person because the person does any of the matters mentioned in paragraphs (1)(a) to (c);
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The section's applicability overlaps with the applicability of other sections.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If this section applies...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceedings do not lie against a person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the section applies, then no civil proceedings lie.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) If this section applies...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable for a penalty under a provision of any law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the section applies, then no penalty under law is liable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) If this section applies...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then: (b) the person is not liable for a penalty under a provision of any law because the person does any of those matters.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The section's applicability overlaps with the applicability of other sections.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If this section applies...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 108(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

108(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Applicability of section regardless of duty
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-108-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 108 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with section regardless of duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Certainty of applicability regardless of duty
modality: Epistemic
operator: Certainty

11 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Definition of IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: IC review application has the meaning given by section 54H.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

110 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 110(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-110
schema version: 2

110(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Respondent agency must provide particulars of proposed action to Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-110-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

110(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Agency must comply with implementation notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-110-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

112 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Note on subsection 25(1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-112-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-112
schema version: 2

114 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-114-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-114
schema version: 2

116 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Restrictions on access to documents imposed by a court
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-116-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-116
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...imposed by a court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using the Act for circumventing court-imposed restrictions
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (c) seeking to use the Act...

118 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-118-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-118
schema version: 2

12 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Defines implementation notice
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 12(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes definition
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
premise text: Section 89

120 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-120-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-120
schema version: 2

122 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 122(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 122(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-122
schema version: 2

122(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Transfer complaint to Information Commissioner upon Ombudsman's decision not to investigate.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-122-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to transfer complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

122(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Complaint transferred under subsection (3) is treated as a complaint made to the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-122-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates overlap between complaint and information Commissioner's jurisdiction.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

124 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-124-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-124
schema version: 2

13 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Definition of Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner has the meaning given by the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

14 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Defines internal review meaning
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Definition of internal review applicant
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: internal review applicant has the meaning given by section 54B.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Subsection 4(1)

16 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Defines investigation recommendations
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Defines investigation results term
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Defines respondent agency
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Defines 'review parties' as given by section 55A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Subsection 4(1)

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Defines access refusal decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: access refusal decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1)

20 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Definition of vexatious applicant declaration
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: vexatious applicant declaration has the meaning given by section 89K.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Subsection 4(1)

21 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Omit “(1)” from a provision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Subsections 12(2) to (4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Subsection 21(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Subparagraph 26(1)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Replace 'Ombudsman' with 'Information Commissioner'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-24-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace 'Ombudsman' with 'Information Commissioner'
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

25 Paragraph 26(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Substitute internal review and IC review phrases.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Paragraph 29(9)(b)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Omit “Ombudsman”, substitute ‘Information Commissioner’.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 Subsection 29(9)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Substitute 'internal review (Part VI)' and 'IC review (Part VII)' for 'review under section 54'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Section 31
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 After section 51D
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Action must have same meaning as in Ombudsman Act 1976 if taken by person or agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must have same meaning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as in Ombudsman Act 1976
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Action taken by person or agency

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)

30 Part VI (heading)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new title
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
schema version: 2

31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
has part: 31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
schema version: 2

31 Before section 53
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-2
schema version: 2

31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Applicant must pay charge within processing period
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Pay charge
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide payment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request received before processing period end

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing

31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Extended processing period for charge notice
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing

32 Section 53
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Substitute 'Act' for 'Part'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-32-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

33 Section 53
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Omit specified sections
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified sections
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 Sections 54 to 57
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Subsection 58(7)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 After section 58
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Before section 58B
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 Subsection 58B(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Substitute 'review in relation to a decision' for 'the review of a decision'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-38-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-38
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces 'the review of a decision' with 'review in relation to a decision'
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

39 Section 58D
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Insertion of additional conditions in a case where 3 Deputy Presidents are present.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-39
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of additional conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 Section 58D

4 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Defines 'affected third party'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 53C defines the scope of this duty
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Section 4(1) imposes a duty on affected third parties

40 Sections 58F, 59 and 59A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Repeal sections
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-40
schema version: 2

41 Section 60
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Section 61
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-42
schema version: 2

43 Before section 63
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.99
note: Insert Schedule 4 Information Commissioner amendments
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Before section 66
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-44
schema version: 2

45 Paragraph 66(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: A person must apply under section 57A to the Tribunal for review of a decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 Paragraph 66(1)(a)

46 Subsections 66(1) and (3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Omit Attorney-General, substitute responsible Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-46
schema version: 2

47 Before section 67
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-48
schema version: 2

48 Paragraph 67(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-48-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

49 Before Part VIII
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Definition of authorized person
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorized person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Section 77

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)

50 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Regulations regarding charge imposition and payment
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-50
schema version: 2

50 Before section 91
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision has been considered under section 29.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has a charge
modality: Deontic
operator: hasCharge
premise text: The applicant is subject to the regulations.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

51 Subsection 91(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Repeal subsection 91(1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: []
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal relation specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: No temporal relation specified

51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51DA(1) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(2) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(3) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(4) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(5) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(6) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(7) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(8) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da
schema version: 2

51DA(1) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Deemed refusal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51DA(1) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

51DA(2) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Principal officer's refusal to amend or annotate record
modality: Deontic
operator: Refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51DA(2) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

51DA(3) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Request for further time to deal with application may be made in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: May

51DA(4) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Allow further time for agency or Minister to deal with application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

51DA(5) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: The Information Commissioner may impose conditions on further time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposition of conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

51DA(6) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Agency/Minister may make decision on application within further time allowed and comply with conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency/Minister has permission to make decision on application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51DA(6) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

51DA(7) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Failure to comply with conditions or make a decision within the allowed time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval that overlaps with the initial decision period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes an implication between the initial decision period and the allowed time.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to comply with conditions or make a decision within the allowed time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the agency or Minister to comply with conditions or make a decision within the allowed time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the initial decision period and the allowed time.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...

51DA(8) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: No power to allow further time under subsection (7) in relation to the decision taken under subsection (2)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No power to allow further time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action by Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (7) applies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No power to allow further time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibits action by Information Commissioner
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (7) applies

52 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 Internal review of decisions—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Agencies must complete internal reviews within 30 days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

52 Subsection 91(1A)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Substitute section number in subsection (1A)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-52-3
schema version: 2

53 Paragraph 91(1C)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Substitute section 26A(2) for section 26A(1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53
schema version: 2

53A What is an access refusal decision?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Definition of access refusal decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Access refusal decision is a specific type of decision
modality: Deontic
operator: is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53A What is an access refusal decision?

53B What is an access grant decision?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Access must be given to a document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Access must be given to a document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53B What is an access grant decision?

53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Defines who is an affected third party for a document request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53c
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the legal personal representative of the deceased person
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for personal information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: section 27A (documents affecting personal privacy) applies in relation to personal information in the document about a living person

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes certain individuals from being affected third parties
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: consultation with a State under section 26A (documents affecting Commonwealth-State relations) is required

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes certain individuals from being affected third parties
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: section 27 (business documents) applies in relation to business information in the document

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes certain individuals from being affected third parties
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: section 27A (documents affecting personal privacy) applies in relation to personal information in the document about a deceased person

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person or organisation concerned (within the meaning of section 27)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines who is an affected third party for a document request
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Who is an affected third party?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?

54 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Agency or Minister must give access to document if it is not exempt under section 47 or conditionally exempt under section 47G.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54
schema version: 2

54 Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
has part: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-2
schema version: 2

54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Agency must provide access to document if refusal decision is made by someone other than the principal officer or responsible Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide access to document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision

54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Applicant may apply for internal review of access refusal decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for internal review
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision

54 Paragraph 91(1C)(b)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Omit specified provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘27(4)”
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘27(1)’

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must give access to document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

54A Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
note: Agency must grant access to document upon request
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54A Internal review—access grant decision

54B Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(2) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(3) Internal review—application for review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b
schema version: 2

54B(1) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review

54B(2) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Agency may extend application deadline
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits agency action
modality: Deontic
operator: May

54B(3) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Exercise of agency power to allow further application period
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between agency actions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring agency action
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her

54C Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(3) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(4) Internal review—decision on internal review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c
schema version: 2

54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Application for internal review of access refusal or grant decision must be made in accordance with this Part.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made in accordance with this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review

54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Agency must arrange for internal review of decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to arrange for internal review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review

54C(3) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Agency must make a fresh decision within 30 days after application receipt.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Decision within 30 days is required
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54C(3) Internal review—decision on internal review

54C(4) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Decision on internal review must extend to a decision made under section 26.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section is part of the temporal interval for decision on internal review.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval includes decision on internal review
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: Decision on internal review occurs within this section.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision on internal review implies that section 26 extends to it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Decision on internal review implies extension to section 26
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Section 26 extends to a decision made under this section.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision on internal review must extend to a decision made under section 26.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to extend decision
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: Section 26 extends to a decision made under this section.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section is applicable to natural persons and legal persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to natural persons and legal persons
modality: Diffusion
operator: appliesTo
premise text: This section applies to natural persons and legal persons.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section is applicable to schema definitions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Applies to schema definitions
modality: SHACL
operator: appliesTo
premise text: This section is part of the schema definition for this law.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54C(4) Internal review—decision on internal review

54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d
schema version: 2

54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Internal review deemed affirmation of original decision if application is made within 30 days and notice not received.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (notice of decision on application has not been received)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Period of 30 days has passed since application was made
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (period of 30 days) and (has ended)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application for internal review within 30 days and notice not received
modality: CogAI
operator: AND
premise text: (application for internal review) and (period of 30 days) and (has ended) AND (notice of decision on application has not been received)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (notice of decision on application has not been received)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affirmation of original decision
modality: Deontic
operator: DEEMED
premise text: (application for internal review has been made) and (period of 30 days has ended)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application for internal review within 30 days and notice not received
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: (application for internal review) and (period of 30 days) and (has ended) AND (notice of decision on application has not been received)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (notice of decision on application has not been received)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace: Application for internal review within 30 days
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (application for internal review) and (period of 30 days) and (has ended)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Agency must provide notice to internal review applicant on same day
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Agency may apply for further time to deal with application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to request extension
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Allow further time for agency to deal with application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Exemptions from internal review
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54e
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from internal review
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply

54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.63
note: The Information Commissioner must make a decision on the review in accordance with Division 7.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54f
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must make a decision on the review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide

54G Key concepts—what is an IC review?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Defines IC review and its meaning.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54g
schema version: 2

54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Definition of IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54h
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?

54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Defines who is an IC review applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54j
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?

54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Defines what is an IC reviewable decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54k
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?

54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l
schema version: 2

54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Application for review of access refusal decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An application may be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Access refusal decisions are subject to internal review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide access refusal decisions subject to internal review.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Application for IC review may be made by or on behalf of the person who made the request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
has part: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
has part: 54M(3) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m
schema version: 2

54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Application for review of access grant decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: can

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Decision to affirm original access grant decision if no internal review decision within 30 days
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affirmation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

54M(3) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Who can make an IC review application?
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

54N IC review applications—application
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54N(1) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(2) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(3) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(4) IC review applications—application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n
schema version: 2

54N(1) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
description: Details on notice sending, copy of relevant notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Application must provide details on notice sending and copy of relevant notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54N(2) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Must provide particulars of basis for dispute
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54N(3) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Office must provide assistance to prepare IC review application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54N(3) IC review applications—application

54N(4) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Must send IC review application to Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to send application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54N(4) IC review applications—application

54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p
schema version: 2

54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Notify affected third parties of non-access to documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Notify affected third party for document of application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Notify Information Commissioner of notice
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q
schema version: 2

54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Not giving IC review applications under certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give IC review applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Notifying affected third party is not required under certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notifying affected third party is not required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

54R IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
has part: 54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r
schema version: 2

54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Withdrawal of IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw
modality: Deontic
operator: may

54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: IC review application withdrawal obligation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Withdrawal of IC review application is taken never to have been made.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54S IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54S(1) IC review applications—time limits
has part: 54S(2) IC review applications—time limits
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s
schema version: 2

54S(1) IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: IC review application must be made within 60 days after notice of decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54S IC review applications—time limits

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be made within 60 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54S(1) IC review applications—time limits

54S(2) IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: IC review application must be made within 30 days after notice of decision under section 26A, 27 or 27A was given to the affected third party.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54S IC review applications—time limits

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make IC review application within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54S(2) IC review applications—time limits

54T IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t
schema version: 2

54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Extension of time for making IC review application may be applied.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Extension of time for IC review applications is allowed if reasonable in all circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowance of extension
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonableness in circumstances
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: Information Commissioner believes

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional extension
modality: LTL
operator: Until

54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Extension of time for making IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowance of extension
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time

54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Notify a specified person or persons of the application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Give notice of the application to a specified person or persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory notification
modality: Deontic
operator: require
premise text: Application under subsection (1)

54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
description: Reasonable opportunity to be heard
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Must notify the Information Commissioner within a time limit
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a reasonable opportunity to be heard
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time

54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
note: Extension of time for IC review applications if notice is given under subsection (5)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

54U Decision to review—interpretation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Applies to a part of an IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54u-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54u
schema version: 2

54V Decision to review—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: May make inquiries to determine whether to undertake IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54v-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54v
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

54W Decision to review—discretion not to review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Decision not to review IC review application under certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54w-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54w
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide not to review IC review application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x
schema version: 2

54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to undertake an IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
description: Decision notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Notify review parties of decision in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Notice must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision and application details.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Exempt matter and certain document information cannot be included in the notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The notice must be given between specified times.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: No specific start and end times are mentioned.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on including exempt matter and certain document information.
modality: Deontic
operator: not include
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: An ordered trace is required for the notice.
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: No specific start and end times are mentioned.

54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
note: Agency or Minister must review actual decisions made after IC review has commenced.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must review actual decisions made after IC review has commenced.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has

54Z Procedure in IC review—general notice requirement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Informing person, agency or Minister who made the decision before IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54z-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54z
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Informing is an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

55 Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(3) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(4) Procedure in IC review—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55
schema version: 2

55 Paragraph 91(1C)(c)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Omit specified provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 27A(1) must be included
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omitting specified provision is prohibited

55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: The Information Commissioner may review an IC reviewable decision without holding a hearing under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may review an IC reviewable decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: None of the review parties have applied for a hearing under section 55B.
modality: Deontic
operator: must not apply

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that there are no unusual circumstances that would warrant a hearing.
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfied

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The review can be adequately determined in the absence of the review parties.
modality: LTL
operator: if

55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: The Information Commissioner may conduct an IC review in a way they consider appropriate.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The IC review may be conducted during a certain time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may do something.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The IC review has parts.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has part

55(3) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: A direction given under paragraph (2)(e) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of direction being a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (3) A direction given under paragraph (2)(e)

55(4) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Information Commissioner must conduct IC review with minimal formality and technicality.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to conduct IC review with minimal formality and technicality.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(4) Procedure in IC review—general

55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a
schema version: 2

55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Defines parties to an IC review proceeding
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: A person whose interests are affected by the IC reviewable decision may apply to be a review party.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Makes a person an IC review party by notice in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a person an IC review party.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
has part: 55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
has part: 55B(3) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b
schema version: 2

55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Request for hearing during IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for hearing is permitted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Notify other review parties of application
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55B(3) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Must give review parties a reasonable opportunity to make submissions and decide whether or not to hold a hearing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give review parties a reasonable opportunity to make submissions and decide whether or not to hold a hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55C Procedure in IC review—representation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Review party may appear in person or be represented by another person.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55c
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

55D Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
has part: 55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d
schema version: 2

55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Agency or Minister has the onus of establishing that a decision is justified.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the IC review applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishing justification
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
premise text: (a) a decision given in respect of the request or application is justified;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishing justification
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
premise text: (a) a decision given in respect of the request or application is justified;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus

55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
note: Affected third party has the onus of establishing that a decision refusing the request is justified or the Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the person who made the request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has onus
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Must establish
modality: Epistemic
operator: mustEstablish

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Has temporal relation
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation

55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Agency or Minister must assist Information Commissioner in IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55da
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner

55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e
schema version: 2

55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Agency/Minister must provide statement of reasons for IC reviewable decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency/Minister must provide statement of reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Agency or Minister must provide adequate statement of reasons upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires agency or Minister to provide adequate statement of reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Provide adequate statement of reasons within specified period or 28 days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide statement of reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55F(1) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
has part: 55F(2) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f
schema version: 2

55F(1) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement

55F(2) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: The Information Commissioner may make a decision in accordance with an agreement without completing the IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may make a decision in accordance with an agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.77
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
has part: 55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g
schema version: 2

55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Agency or Minister may vary access refusal decision during IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to vary access refusal decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access

55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Conditional commencement of access refusal decision variation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access

55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h
schema version: 2

55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: The Information Commissioner may refer a question of law to the Federal Court of Australia.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: The Information Commissioner may refer questions of law.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia may be exercised by a single judge.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Must not give a decision before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference during the period when the question is referred.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which Information Commissioner must not give decisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not, for the purposes of the IC review:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on giving decisions before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not proceed in a manner, or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on proceeding in a manner inconsistent with Federal Court of Australia's opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: The Information Commissioner must not proceed in a manner, or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on giving decisions before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not, for the purposes of the IC review:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference during the period when the question is referred.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval during which Information Commissioner must not give decisions.
modality: LTL
operator: During
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not, for the purposes of the IC review:

55J Procedure in IC review—sending of documents to, and
type: Concept
description: Documents and information in possession of the Information Commissioner
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Must disclose documents to Federal Court of Australia upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55j-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55j
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k
schema version: 2

55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: The Information Commissioner may perform functions and exercise powers of the person who made the IC reviewable decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Decision of the Information Commissioner has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during the period of the IC reviewable decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Decision applies during the period of the IC review
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agency or Minister's decision is effective.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Decision implies that the agency or Minister's decision is effective
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: same effect
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to all relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Decision diffuses to all relevant parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
description: Statement of reasons, Statement of rights
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Exempt matter cannot be included in a decision on IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exempt matter cannot be included in a decision on IC review.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of information inclusion
modality: Deontic
operator: not include
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
has part: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l
schema version: 2

55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: No power to give access to exempt documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: No power to give access to exempt matter
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt matter
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt

55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
has part: 55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m
schema version: 2

55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: The Information Commissioner must decide to amend records under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An amendment must be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The decision is required

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An amendment is required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The author of the opinion must be qualified to form the opinion
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The author lacks qualifications

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records

55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: Cannot amend records under certain conditions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...satisfied of either of the following: (a) the record is a record of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for amendment limitation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...amend the record if he or she is satisfied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Conditional amendment limitation
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...amend the record if he or she is satisfied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...

55N Decision on IC review—obligation to comply with decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Must comply with Information Commissioner's decision on IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55n
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Decision of the Information Commissioner

55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p
schema version: 2

55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Agency must comply with section 55N
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Application for enforcement of IC review decision against agency
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application must be made during the IC review process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application must be made during IC review process
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The application must be made during the IC review process

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must enforce the IC review decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: State must enforce IC review decision
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: The state bears duty to enforce the IC review decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must enforce the IC review decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must enforce IC review decision
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: State bears duty to enforce IC review decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Court may make orders to secure compliance by principal officer or Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Application under subsection (1) may not be made before the end of the time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot make application
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Correction of errors in IC review decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55q-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to correct errors
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r
schema version: 2

55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: The Information Commissioner may compel a person to produce information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Compelling production of information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
description: Documents
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Notice to produce documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and production
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to produce
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to provide information or produce a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner requires the person to provide information or produce a document.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
description: Information Commissioner
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Notice must be in writing and specify compliance details.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s
schema version: 2

55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: The Information Commissioner must permit access by those entitled.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must permit access.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Permit inspection of documents held by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Permit inspection of documents at reasonable time
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t
schema version: 2

55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Principal officer of an agency or Minister claims a document is exempt.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document production is under obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Document production is under obligation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: production under obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies to an IC review of a decision in relation to a...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is exempt and produced.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Document is exempt and produced.
modality: Argumentation
operator: exempt document produced
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a Minister claims that...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document classification is exempt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Document classification is exempt.
modality: CogAI
operator: exempt document classification
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a Minister claims that...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is claimed to be exempt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Claiming a document is exempt.
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
premise text: Section 55U does not apply to the document.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document production spreads obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Document production spreads obligation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: production under obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies to an IC review of a decision in relation to a...

55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: The Information Commissioner may require a document to be produced for deciding whether it is an exempt document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has the power to require a document to be produced.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Must return exempt document to person who produced it
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return exempt document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: The Information Commissioner may require the production of an exempt document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to produce information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Access to document is restricted to authorized persons.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts access to the document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict

55U Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national security
has part: 55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national security
has part: 55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national security
has part: 55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national security
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u
schema version: 2

55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: IC review of a decision in relation to an exempt document under section 33 or 34.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review IC documents
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national security

55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: The Information Commissioner may only require the production of a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security

55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Require document production for inspection by Information Commissioner if exempt claim is disputed.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Requires evidence to be satisfied before requiring document production.
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Involves an ordered trace of required actions.
modality: LTL
operator: ordered

55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Restrict access to exempt documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Return document to producer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Information Commissioner's satisfaction

55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
has part: 55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v
schema version: 2

55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Refusal of access to a document under section 24A
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies documents as accessible or not under section 24A using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to a document under section 24A
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Agency or Minister must conduct further searches for a document upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct further searches
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w
schema version: 2

55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Notice must be in writing, specify time and place for compliance.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Requires persons to appear in response to a notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person to appear.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x
schema version: 2

55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: The Information Commissioner may administer an oath or affirmation to a person and examine the person on oath or affirmation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must administer an oath or affirmation to a person and examine the person on oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: The person must tell the truth when answering questions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation to provide truthful answers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: The person believes they will tell the truth.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between examination and breach of requirement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...breaches that requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application of obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...breaches that requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...breaches that requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of examination and breach of requirement.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: No loss of legal professional privilege when information is given, produced or referred to for the purposes of this Part.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55y
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal professional privilege obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional

55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z
schema version: 2

55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Protection from liability for good faith information gathering
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide information in good faith
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability

55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Civil proceedings do not lie against a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This section applies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability

55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Protects from liability for information gathering powers
modality: CogAI
operator: Protects
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to protect from liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses protection from liability
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of applicability
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)

55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Scope of Division
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55za-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55za
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55za-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb
schema version: 2

55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence from Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide personal appearance and evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence on potential damage to Commonwealth security, defence, or international relations if proposed deletions are not made.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner must request Inspector-General to appear personally within a certain time frame
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for requesting personal appearance and evidence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Inspector-General must appear personally before determining access to document with deletions

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector-General must give evidence on potential damage
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to request personal appearance and evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Information Commissioner must request Inspector-General to appear personally

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner must be informed of potential damage
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information on potential damage
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Inspector-General must give evidence on potential damage

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector-General must appear personally before divulging information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Permission to divulge information on potential damage
modality: Epistemic
operator: CAN
premise text: Information Commissioner may divulge information if Inspector-General appears personally

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector-General must appear personally before requesting evidence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Permission to request personal appearance and evidence on potential damage
modality: LTL
operator: CAN
premise text: Information Commissioner may request Inspector-General to appear personally

55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Agency and Minister must provide evidence before hearing Inspector-General's evidence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55ZB(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: The Information Commissioner is not bound by the Inspector-General's opinion.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is not bound.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner is not bound by the Inspector-General's opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Inspector-General expresses an opinion.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is exempted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision exempts the Information Commissioner from the Inspector-General's opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: Inspector-General expresses an opinion.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is not required to follow.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision does not imply that the Information Commissioner must follow the Inspector-General's opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
premise text: Inspector-General expresses an opinion.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is exempted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision defines a condition for the Information Commissioner's exemption from the Inspector-General's opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: IsExemptedFrom
premise text: Obligation defined by Inspector-General's opinion.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is bound.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision defines a condition for the Information Commissioner's binding obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: IsBoundBy
premise text: Obligation defined by Inspector-General's opinion.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZB(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

55ZC Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Must comply with a request unless not qualified.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zc
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Insufficient qualification
modality: Epistemic
operator: NOT QUALIFIED

55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd
schema version: 2

55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Applicability to Inspector-General's compliance with a request under section 55ZB.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies for the purposes of enabling the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to comply with a request under section 55ZB.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to
premise text: Section applies for the purposes of enabling the Inspector-General to comply with a request under section 55ZB.

55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Allow Inspector-General to take possession of documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

56 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Third party can apply for review of access grant decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56
schema version: 2

56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2
schema version: 2

56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Right to appeal on questions of law from Information Commissioner's decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
premise text: Review party may appeal

56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Appeal must be instituted within a specified time frame after IC review decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Appeal must be instituted within a specified time frame after IC review decision.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) An appeal under this section must be instituted:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be instituted within a specified time frame.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) An appeal under this section must be instituted:

56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction during the period in which appeals are instituted under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the provision and its application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has a system for determining appeals instituted under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Existence of artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Existence of jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction during the period in which appeals are instituted under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the provision and its application
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia conforms to a schema for determining appeals instituted under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Existence of schema application
modality: SHACL
operator: has
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.

56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Jurisdiction to make findings of fact under section 56A
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Jurisdiction includes
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (3)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subsubsection (3) included in subsection (4)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subsubsection
premise text: (3)

56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Must hear and determine the appeal.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hear and determine the appeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: The Federal Court of Australia may not make certain decisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

56 Section 92
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

56A Appeals—Federal Court of Australia may make findings of fact
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Court may make findings of fact in appeals under section 56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

57 Review by the Tribunal—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Application for review by the Tribunal
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57
schema version: 2

57 Section 93
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An application may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for the review of certain decisions (see section 57A).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application may be made
modality: Deontic
operator: has

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 6 deals with the circumstances in which the Tribunal may make recommendations as to costs.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Division 6 deals with the circumstances in which the Tribunal may make recommendations as to costs
modality: LTL
operator: during

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Review by the Tribunal—guide

57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
has part: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a
schema version: 2

57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Application for review of certain decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the time limit is BETWEEN 0 and 30 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time limit for application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 sets out the time within which the application for review must be made

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may make an application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: A person whose interests are affected by the decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must apply within the specified time limit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must apply within time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 sets out the time within which the application for review must be made

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be affected by the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be affected by decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A person whose interests are affected by the decision (see section 27 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may make an application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: An application may be made to the Tribunal for review of the following decisions:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Prescribed time for lodging an application for review of IC reviewable decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the prescribed time is a temporal interval between which a person must lodge an application for review of an IC reviewable decision mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prescribed time is a temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the prescribed time applies to AI decision-making in IC reviewable decisions mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Prescribed time applies to AI decision-making
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the period: ... is the prescribed time for a person to lodge an application for review of an IC reviewable decision mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide prescribed time
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the prescribed time spreads to other IC reviewable decisions mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prescribed time spreads to other decisions
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the prescribed time contains a temporal trace of when a person must lodge an application for review of an IC reviewable decision mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prescribed time contains a temporal trace
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 58(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 58(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 58(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58
schema version: 2

58(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Condition for allowing further time
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner must impose conditions if allowed further time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to impose conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may impose
premise text: Information Commissioner may allow further time

58(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Agency's decision on application is not affected if it complies with conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agency's decision overlaps with the further time allowed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Agency recognizes its own actions.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (6) Subsection (2) (deemed affirmation) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied, if the agency:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's decision is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Agency's actions diffuse to the further time allowed.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Agency's decision is until the further time allowed.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

58(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Agency must comply with conditions imposed under subsection (5) within the further time allowed.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

58(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: Prevents Information Commissioner from allowing further time under section 58(2) in certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 58(8) has an end time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between sections 58(2) and 58(8)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 58(2) has a start time

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 58(8) restricts Information Commissioner's decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Limits Information Commissioner's decision-making
modality: CogAI
operator: Restricts
premise text: Section 58(7) applies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 58(8) prohibits further time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 58(2) allows further time

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 58(8) restricts Information Commissioner's action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Limits Information Commissioner's ability to act
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restricts
premise text: Section 58(7) applies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 58(8) is after section 58(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections 58(2) and 58(8)
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Section 58(2) is before section 58(8)

58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
has part: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a
schema version: 2

58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Access to document is refused under section 24A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (document cannot be found etc.)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Tribunal may require further searches for document review purposes.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
has part: 58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa
schema version: 2

58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Amendment to records requires satisfaction of conditions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met before or after the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditions must be met between two points in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Tribunal's decision is made at a certain point in time

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditions are necessary and sufficient for amendment
modality: CogAI
operator: if and only if
premise text: Tribunal's decision has a certain impact on records

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amendment requires satisfaction of conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires conditions to be met
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Tribunal has power to amend records

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditions are necessary and sufficient for amendment
modality: Diffusion
operator: if and only if
premise text: Tribunal's decision has a certain impact on records

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met before or after the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditions must be met between two points in time
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: Tribunal's decision is made at a certain point in time

58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Limitation on amending records in decisions under section 57A
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the decision whether to amend the record...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves the determination of a question that the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency (on internal review), the Information Commissioner, a court or tribunal.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...amend the record if it is satisfied of either of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal cannot amend records in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The Tribunal must not...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...amend the record if it is satisfied of either of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal's duty to consider amendment limitations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The Tribunal must not...

59 Subsections 6(4A) to (4C)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-59
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Defines 'complainant' for the purpose of the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 4(1)

60 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Application for review of a decision may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60
schema version: 2

60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
has part: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-2
schema version: 2

60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Applicability of section to proceedings under this Part
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to specified proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties

60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Agency decisions are binding on the agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding effect
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Agency decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties

60 After section 6B
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa
schema version: 2

60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Requirement to notify affected third party
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Agency must notify affected third party upon request for access to document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must notify affected third party.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab
schema version: 2

60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Not giving a document in relation to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A is an obligation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: No notification required under certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of notification
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of notification
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Notification would prejudice an investigation or enforcement

61 Onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Agency/Minister must establish decision is justified
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61
schema version: 2

61 Subsection 19(4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Omit specific text from subsection (1)(a) or under subsection (2)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision is justified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishment of onus
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
premise text: Agency/Minister applied for review

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Tribunal should give adverse decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishment of onus
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
premise text: Applicant applied for review

61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61A(1) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
has part: 61A(1B) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
has part: 61A(2) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
has part: 61A(3) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a
schema version: 2

61A(1) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: The Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 applies to proceedings under this Part.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to apply the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A(1) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

61A(1B) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Establishes deadlines for lodging documents in IC reviewable decisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligation to meet deadlines.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

61A(2) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Agency or Minister must comply with obligation under paragraph 37(1)(a) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A(2) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

61A(3) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Tribunal's powers not limited by subsection (2)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal's powers not limited by subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A(3) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

62 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Identify person who made request for decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-62
schema version: 2

62 Subparagraph 19R(3)(b)(iii)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Modify section heading
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-62-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a temporal relation between the request and the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establish a temporal relation between the request and the decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A knowledge graph of requests and decisions is created
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Create a knowledge graph of requests and decisions
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person who made the request must be identified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identify the person who made the request
modality: Deontic
operator: Identification
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about the request and decision is diffused
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse information about the request and decision
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of requests and decisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establish a recurring trace of requests and decisions
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

63 Subsection 19R(4) (table item 4, column 2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Omit specific provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-63
schema version: 2

64 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Notifying an affected third party would prejudice certain activities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-64
schema version: 2

64 Subsection 35(6A)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Omit specific clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...do any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notification timing overlaps with investigation or administration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (3) The circumstances covered by this subsection are...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...do any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents notification of an affected third party.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The circumstances covered by this subsection are...

65 Application—Part 1
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.127
note: Amendments apply in relation to certain requests and applications made after commencement.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-65
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to comply with certain requests and applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65 Application—Part 1

66 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Must provide a reasonable opportunity to present cases before determining an application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-66
schema version: 2

66 Application—Part 2
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Amendments apply to complaints made after commencement
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply to complaints made after commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Application—Part 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty to provide a reasonable opportunity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

67 Savings—complaints on foot continue under old law
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Continue dealing with complaint under old law if certain conditions met
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-67
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continue dealing with complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
premise text: (a) before the commencement of Part 2, a complaint is made to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976; and (b) at the commencement of that Part, the Ombudsman has not informed the complainant of the result of the complaint under section 12 of that Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67 Savings—complaints on foot continue under old law

68 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: A person must make an IC review application for review of the deemed decision if certain conditions are met.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-68
schema version: 2

68 Investigations and complaints—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: The Information Commissioner may investigate an action taken by an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-68-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Investigations and complaints—guide

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The IC review application is made during the period when the agency or Minister has not made a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: the Information Commissioner must deal with the IC review application for review of the deemed decision as if it were an IC review application for the review of the actual decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Information Commissioner must deal with the IC review application for review of the deemed decision as if it were an IC review application for the review of the actual decision
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: a person makes an IC review application for review of the deemed decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must make a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review) in relation to the deemed decision
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: the agency or Minister must make a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must deal with every IC review application for review of the actual decision in a similar manner
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring action
modality: LTL
operator: every time
premise text: the Information Commissioner must deal with the IC review application for review of the deemed decision as if it were an IC review application for the review of the actual decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
has part: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-69
schema version: 2

69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: The Information Commissioner must investigate a complaint.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Power to investigate agency actions
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has power to be investigated
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

6C Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6C(1) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
has part: 6C(2) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c
schema version: 2

6C(1) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Requirement to consult with Information Commissioner when certain conditions are met.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Ombudsman is satisfied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult with Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6C(1) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner

6C(2) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
note: Must consult Information Commissioner about complaint to avoid inquiries by both parties.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman must not investigate the action without consulting the Information Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Ombudsman must consult the Information Commissioner.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman is allowed to stop investigating the action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to decide not to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Ombudsman may decide not to investigate the action.

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Definition of 'engage in conduct'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the meaning of 'engage in conduct'
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Relates to a subclass of 'conduct'
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Subsection 4(1)

70 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Must hold hearing in public unless certain conditions apply.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70
schema version: 2

70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2
schema version: 2

70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Complainant may complain to the Information Commissioner about an action taken by an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Indicates the subject of knowledge or inquiry.
modality: Epistemic
operator: about

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Expresses a temporal relation between actions.
modality: LTL
operator: complain

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Complaint must be in writing and identify the agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identify the agency
modality: Deontic
operator: IDENTIFY

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Office must provide assistance to a person making a complaint.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must hold hearing in public
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: None

71 Information Commissioner investigations—interpretation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Interpretation of Subdivision application to part of a complaint
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-71-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-71
schema version: 2

72 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-72
schema version: 2

72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: The Information Commissioner may make inquiries of the respondent agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-72-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries

73 Information Commissioner investigations—discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: Discretion not to investigate a complaint about an action made under section 70.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-73
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73 Information Commissioner investigations—discretion not to

74 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Agency/Minister must notify Information Commissioner of variation or substitution.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74
schema version: 2

74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(1) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(2) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(3) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(4) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(5) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2
schema version: 2

74(1) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Transfer of complaints to Ombudsman
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to

74(2) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: May decide not to investigate an action.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

74(3) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Transfer complaint to Ombudsman and provide information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer complaint to Ombudsman.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

74(4) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
description: Reasons for Information Commissioner's decision
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Notice must state reasons for decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice must state reasons for decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to state reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

74(5) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Transfer of complaints to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(5) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency/Minister must notify Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75
schema version: 2

75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Information Commissioner must notify respondent agency in writing before beginning an investigation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: The Information Commissioner must provide notice if they decide not to investigate a complaint.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
description: Decision notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Notify complainant and respondent agency of decision in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST notify...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
description: Reasons for Information Commissioner's decision
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Notice under subsection (3) must state reasons for decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 76(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 76(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76
schema version: 2

76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
has part: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-2
schema version: 2

76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Investigations must be conducted in private and as the Information Commissioner thinks fit.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct investigations in private and as the Information Commissioner thinks fit.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) An investigation must be conducted...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: The Information Commissioner may obtain information from any officer of an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

76(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: The Information Commissioner must give a copy of a decision on an IC review to each review party.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

76(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: Publication requirement for a document purporting to be certified by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to publish the document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

76(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: The Information Commissioner must publish a decision on an IC review to members of the public generally.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a decision on an IC review to members of the public generally.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77
schema version: 2

77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Authorized person may enter and remain at a place with consent.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Authorized person may enter a place occupied by an agency or contracted service provider.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized person can enter a place.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Authorized person must obtain consent before entering a place.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between consent and entry
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The authorised person may enter a place only if: (a) consent to the entry has been given by the person (the consenting person) who is: (i) in the case of an agency—the principal officer of the agency; or (ii) in the case of a contracted service provider—the person in charge (however described) of the contracted service provider;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Authorized person must obtain consent before entering a place.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform consenting person of right to refuse consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: before giving the consent, the authorised person informed the consenting person that he or she may refuse consent.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between consent and entry
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) The authorised person may enter a place only if: (a) consent to the entry has been given by the person (the consenting person) who is: (i) in the case of an agency—the principal officer of the agency; or (ii) in the case of a contracted service provider—the person in charge (however described) of the contracted service provider;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Authorised person must leave premises upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigation overlaps with the request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between investigations and requests
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial agent influences the investigation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial agent influence on investigations
modality: CogAI
operator: Influences
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorised person must leave the premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to leave premises
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of the information commissioner's power is affected by the request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information commissioner's power
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request is recurrently traced with the investigation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of requests and investigations
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Defines who is an authorized person under section 78.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorized person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the subject of an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Authorized persons are defined.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an APS employee...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of authorized person
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: An authorized person is...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

78 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Correcting obvious errors in decisions or statements of reasons.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78
schema version: 2

78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
has part: 78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-2
schema version: 2

78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Places for which investigations are prohibited
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which

78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Authorized person must not enter or carry on investigation without approval from Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of unauthorized entry or investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Authorized person must not enter or carry on investigation without approval from Minister.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Correcting obvious errors is obligatory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to correct errors
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Information Commissioner may correct an obvious error

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79
schema version: 2

79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Obligation to produce information during investigation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Notice to produce information Commissioner investigations
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to give information or produce a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may require
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Notice must be in writing, specify place and time for compliance.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During a period specified in a notice, the person must comply.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (3).

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if their conduct breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: If the person's conduct breaches the requirement, then they commit an offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: The person's conduct breaches the requirement.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if their conduct breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If the person engages in conduct, then they breach the requirement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The person engages in conduct.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During a period specified in a notice, the person must comply.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (3).

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Definition of IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: IC review has the meaning given by section 54G.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Subsection 4(1)

80 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-80
schema version: 2

80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.109
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(1) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
has part: 80(2) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-80-2
schema version: 2

80(1) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Information Commissioner may take possession, make copies, extracts, or hold documents for investigation purposes.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(1) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with

80(2) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Must permit inspection of documents during investigation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-81-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-81
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents

82 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82
schema version: 2

82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2
schema version: 2

82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing, specifying time and place of compliance
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Notice requirements for compliance with investigation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timeframe for compliance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Reasoning about compliance requirements
modality: Argumentation
operator: REASONING
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of compliance requirements
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of compliance
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: A person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches a requirement specified in a notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on engaging in conduct that breaches requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: The person engages in conduct.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to comply with requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to comply with requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: right
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for requirements and conduct.
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83
schema version: 2

83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Information Commissioner may administer oath or affirmation to a person required to appear.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
description: True answers
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide true answers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory truth-telling
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person taking the oath or affirmation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to comply is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

84 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-84
schema version: 2

84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: No loss of legal professional privilege when information is given, produced or referred to for the purposes of this Part.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-84-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal professional privilege is not lost when information is shared.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal

85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
note: Protection from liability for good faith provision of information during investigation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-85
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect individuals from liability for good faith provision of information during investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86
schema version: 2

86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2
schema version: 2

86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Notify respondent agency upon completion of investigation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between investigation completion and notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify the respondent agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
description: Investigation results, recommendations, and reasons
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Notice on completion of investigation must state investigation results, recommendations, and reasons.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state investigation results, recommendations, and reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Agency may provide comments on notice to Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May provide comments
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: The Information Commissioner must give a copy of the notice to the complainant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the notice to the complainant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Excluding certain matters from a report upon request of the complainant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to exclude.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding certain matters from a report.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
premise text: Request of the complainant.

86(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Production of documents for access to exempt documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory production of documents
modality: Deontic
operator: require

86(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: May make copies of documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make copies
modality: Deontic
operator: may

86(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Return original documents and destroy copies after giving evidence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return original documents and destroy copies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

86(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Permits inspection of documents held by the Inspector-General.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

86(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Permit person to inspect document at reasonable times.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

86(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Inspector-General must be given a reasonable time to consider documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a period within which to consider...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
premise text: (8) The Information Commissioner must allow the Inspector-General...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Investigation results include investigation matters, opinions, conclusions, and suggestions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-87-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-87
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the

88 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 88(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-88
schema version: 2

88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-88-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between investigation and implementation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The investigation recommendations, in relation to the investigation, are...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rational basis for implementing investigation recommendations.
modality: Argumentation
operator: should
premise text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for investigating and implementing recommendations.
modality: CogAI
operator: by
premise text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to implement investigation recommendations.
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
premise text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Mechanism for dissemination of investigation recommendations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: The investigation recommendations, in relation to the investigation, are...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the

88(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: May have regard to evidence given in IC review and receive further evidence for making findings of fact.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the period during which further evidence may be received
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: IC review is a temporal interval between which further evidence may be received
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) have regard to the evidence given in the IC review
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May have regard to evidence given in IC review
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY HAVE REGARD TO
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) receive further evidence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May receive further evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY RECEIVE FURTHER EVIDENCE
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the further evidence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Further evidence is a class of evidence that may be considered
modality: Deontic
operator: IS A CLASS OF
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the period during which further evidence may be received
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: IC review is a temporal interval between which further evidence may be received
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)

88(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: No limitation on power to remit case to Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-88-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The remittal order made by the Federal Court of Australia overlaps with other remittal orders.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Remittal order overlaps with other remittal orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia recognizes the Information Commissioner's power to remit cases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Federal Court of Australia recognizes Information Commissioner's power
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6) to make an order remitting the case to be heard and decided again by the Information Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Federal Court of Australia has an obligation to remit case to Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The remittal order made by the Federal Court of Australia diffuses to other cases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Remittal order diffuses to other cases
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The remittal order made by the Federal Court of Australia repeats a previous remittal order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Remittal order repeats previous remittal order
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)

89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Agency must take adequate action following investigation recommendation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Adequate action taken.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Investigation recommendation given.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement

89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a
schema version: 2

89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Agency must respond to implementation notice within specified time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with the requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with the requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
description: Report to Minister
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: The Information Commissioner must give a written report to the responsible Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must give a written report to the responsible Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Must provide a copy of the report to the Minister responsible for administration of this Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Information Commissioner must prepare a copy of the report to give to the FOI Minister that excludes certain matters.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a copy of the report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Must cause a report to be laid before each House of the Parliament.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to cause a report to be laid before each House of the Parliament.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Agency must provide report with details of response to implementation notice and proposed action.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for

89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
has part: 89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c
schema version: 2

89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Obligation to ensure documents are reported
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure reporting of documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring

89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Exempt matter and certain information types cannot be included in a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on including exempt matter and certain information types.
modality: Deontic
operator: not include

89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d
schema version: 2

89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Restrictions on amendments to certain documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Limitation on Information Commissioner investigations
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Limits investigations to specific conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Limitation
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner may, in the document, recommend that an amendment be made to a record...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Provides justification for limiting investigations
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner may, in the document, recommend that an amendment be made to a record...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Information Commissioner investigations
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Limitation on recommending amendment to a record
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the determination of a question that the person seeking amendment of the record is...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the investigation, no amendment can be made
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Amendment implies entitlement to have determined by agency
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency (on internal review), the Information Commissioner, a court or tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Amendment implies entitlement to have determined by artificial agent
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made to a record
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot recommend amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3) The Information Commissioner must not...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency (on internal review), the Information Commissioner, a court or tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Amendment implies entitlement to have determined by court or tribunal
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...

89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89E(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
has part: 89E(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e
schema version: 2

89E(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Protection from civil proceedings for loss or damage suffered by another person due to an action under section 70.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect individuals from civil proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89E(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

89E(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Complaint must be made in good faith for subsection (1) to apply.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89E(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Ombudsman's powers not affected by this Part
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89f
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman's powers are not affected by this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of Ombudsman's powers
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected

89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Report must not include certain information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89g
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report must not include exempt matter or information about certain documents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reporting of exempt matter and certain documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain

89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
has part: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h
schema version: 2

89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Ombudsman must investigate certain decisions not to grant access to documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) seek from any person the reasons for a decision made under this Act not to give access to an exempt document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) require any person to give any information or to answer any questions concerning the decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to require information or answer questions concerning decision
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
has part: 89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j
schema version: 2

89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: The Ombudsman may recommend an amendment to a record if satisfied of certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to recommend an amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy conditions before recommending an amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: must be satisfied

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in

89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Ombudsman cannot recommend amendment to record under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No amendment to record
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ombudsman cannot perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Ombudsman's role

89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k
schema version: 2

89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: The Information Commissioner may declare a person to be a vexatious applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of a person as a vexatious applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration

89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: The Information Commissioner may make a declaration on the application of an agency or Minister, or on their initiative.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration

89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Agency or Minister must establish declaration
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish the declaration within a certain timeframe.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration if they apply for it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of onus
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If an agency or Minister applies for a declaration, they have the onus of establishing that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister requires evidence to establish the declaration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requiring evidence
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The onus of establishing the declaration spreads to the Information Commissioner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of onus
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO

89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: The Information Commissioner must give written notice to the person in relation to whom the vexatious applicant declaration is made.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must give written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration

89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89L(1) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
has part: 89L(2) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
has part: 89L(3) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
has part: 89L(4) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l
schema version: 2

89L(1) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
note: Grounds for declaration of vexatious applicant
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the conditions are met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: The Information Commissioner may make a vexatious applicant declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the conditions are met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the person
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: The person has repeatedly engaged in access actions; and...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89L(1) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

89L(2) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
note: Engages in an access action if makes a request, application under section 48, internal review application, or IC review application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request, application under section 48, internal review application, or IC review application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has part
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
premise text: Access action

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89L(2) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

89L(3) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
note: The Information Commissioner must give a person an opportunity to make written or oral submissions before making a declaration.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must give the person an opportunity to make written or oral submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89L(3) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

89L(4) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
note: Grounds for declaration of vexatious applicants
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for abuse of process
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) harassing or intimidating an individual or an employee of an agency;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits abuse of process for access action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) In this section:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies abuse of process as a ground for declaration
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: abuse of the process for an access action includes, but is not limited to:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89L(4) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m
schema version: 2

89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: A vexatious applicant declaration has effect in accordance with the terms and conditions stated.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration has effect during the term and condition period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Declaration has effect during the term and condition period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Declaration made

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration has effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration has effect
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: Declaration made

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Refusal to consider certain requests or applications without written permission.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence reasoning
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without the written permission of the Information Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Agency or Minister may refuse to consider...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of requests and applications
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Notify vexatious applicant of decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: A person can apply for review of a decision under section 89K.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89n
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possibility of action
modality: Deontic
operator: can

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge requirement
modality: Epistemic
operator: must know

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: occurs before

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal

89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: Staff must be given security clearance.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89p
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide security clearance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance

9 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Definition of IC reviewable decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: IC reviewable decision has the meaning given by section 54K.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

90 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: Conditional commencement of freedom of information amendment
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90
schema version: 2

90 Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2
schema version: 2

90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright lies against the Commonwealth, a Minister, an agency or an officer of an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publication or access is required or permitted under Part II or section 11C.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general

90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: No action for defamation or breach of confidence against a person supplying a document to a Minister or agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect against defamation and breach of confidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general

90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
note: Publication of certain documents is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The publication of a document is covered by this subsection if:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

92 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: List of parties in a proceeding before the Tribunal for a review of a decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92
schema version: 2

92 Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92(1) Protection against criminal liability
has part: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-2
schema version: 2

92(1) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Minister or officer not guilty of criminal offence due to good faith publication or access
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Good faith publication or access overlaps with the scope of Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Good faith publication or access overlaps with the scope of Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents) defines the scope of document publication or access

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister or officer not guilty of criminal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister or officer has an obligation to act in good faith
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Good faith publication or access is required

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister or officer has permission to publish or access a document in good faith
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister or officer has permission to publish or access a document in good faith
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Good faith publication or access is required

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister or officer has an obligation to act in good faith when publishing or accessing a document
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister or officer has an obligation to act in good faith when publishing or accessing a document
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Good faith publication or access is required

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Good faith publication or access is an until condition under Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Good faith publication or access is an until condition under Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents) defines the scope of document publication or access

92(2) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Must provide information to a State for specified purposes.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide information to the State.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person is not guilty of a criminal offence only because...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of parties in a proceeding before the Tribunal for a review of a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93(1) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
has part: 93(2) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
has part: 93(3) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93
schema version: 2

93(1) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Agencies and Ministers must provide information to the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence requirements
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: This section applies to:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Schema-based validation
modality: SHACL
operator: VALIDATES
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.

93(2) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Must provide information to Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

93(3) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Must comply with regulations regarding information provision and record keeping.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

93A Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93A(1) Guidelines
has part: 93A(2) Guidelines
has part: 93A(3) Guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a
schema version: 2

93A(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: The Information Commissioner may issue guidelines by instrument in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Guidelines

93A(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Regard must be had to guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Guidelines

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regard must be had to guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93A(2) Guidelines

93A(3) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
note: Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Guidelines

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

93B Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(3) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(4) Review of operation of Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b
schema version: 2

93B(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Minister must undertake review of Act's operation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to undertake review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act

93B(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Review of operation of Act must start within 2 years and be completed within 6 months.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Act
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

93B(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: The Minister must prepare a written report about the review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a written report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

93B(4) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Minister must lay report before Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must lay report before Parliament.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

94 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Requester has onus to establish justification for decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-94
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requester must establish justification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requester has onus to establish justification.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
premise text: Decision is justified if requester establishes it.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requester's request is justified if they establish it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Justification required for decision.
modality: Epistemic
operator: justification
premise text: Decision is only justified if requester establishes it.

96 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-96-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96
schema version: 2

98 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-98-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-98
schema version: 2

1 Subparagraph 212(2)(a)(vi)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

10 Subsection 4(4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Delegate staff members as provided by section 99 of the Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to delegate staff members.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Subsection 4(4)

11 Subsection 12P(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

12 Paragraph 3ZQJ(2)(c)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(1) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(2) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(3) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(4) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(5) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(6) Guidelines relating to privacy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

12(1) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Agency must comply with guidelines
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(1) Guidelines relating to privacy

12(2) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: The Information Commissioner must issue guidelines relating to the matching of data under this Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Guidelines relating to privacy

12(3) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: The function is a privacy function for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The function is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(3) Guidelines relating to privacy

12(4) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
description: Report including specified matters
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Agency must report data-matching program to Information Commissioner and Parliament.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(4) Guidelines relating to privacy

12(5) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Agency must provide report to Minister on data-matching program.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(5) Guidelines relating to privacy

12(6) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Guidelines take effect after disallowance ends or in accordance with their commencement provision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from that day onwards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Guidelines take effect during disallowance period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) the first day on which the guidelines are no longer subject to disallowance;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from that day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guidelines take effect when disallowance ends.
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
premise text: (a) the first day on which the guidelines are no longer subject to disallowance;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from that day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guidelines take effect when commencement provision is met.
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
premise text: (b) if the guidelines make provision for their commencement after that day—in accordance with that provision.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from either that day or the specified commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Guidelines take effect when disallowance ends or commencement provision is met.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: takesEffect
premise text: (a) the first day on which the guidelines are no longer subject to disallowance; (b) if the guidelines make provision for their commencement after that day—in accordance with that provision.

126 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-126-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-126
schema version: 2

128 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-128-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-128
schema version: 2

13 Paragraph 23YDAE(2)(g)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
schema version: 2

130 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-130-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-130
schema version: 2

132 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-132-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-132
schema version: 2

134 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Note: Heading alteration for section 309
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-134-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-134
schema version: 2

136 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-136-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-136
schema version: 2

14 Paragraph 23YO(2)(g)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omission of term
modality: Deontic
operator: omission

15 Subsection 23YUK(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Substitute a person nominated by the Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace nominee with specified individual
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Subsection 23YUK(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of

16 Subsection 23YV(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Substitute a person nominated by the Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-16
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace a term with another
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subsection 23YV(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of

17 Division 5 of Part VIIC (heading)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 85ZZ(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-18-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-18
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

19 After subsection 85ZZ(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Functions are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-19
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The functions are privacy functions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Function is a privacy function
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 After subsection 85ZZ(1)

2 Paragraph 43(2)(g)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

20 Subsection 85ZZ(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-20-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-20
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

21 Subsection 85ZZA(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section heading.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-21
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Subsection 85ZZA(1)

22 Subsection 85ZZA(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Omit specified text
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-22-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-22
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘Privacy Commissioner’s’, substitute ‘Information Commissioner’s’.

23 Subsections 85ZZC(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Subsection 85ZZD(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Alters heading of section 85ZZD by changing 'Privacy Commissioner' to 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Subsections 85ZZD(2) to (4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 85ZZF(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-26
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

27 Subsection 10(5) (definition of sampling procedures)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Definition of sampling procedures modified to include the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-27
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces Privacy Commissioner with a specific role.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 Subsection 10(5) (definition of sampling procedures)

28 Section 12
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Subsection 13(1) (definition of Commissioner)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Definition of Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-29
schema version: 2

30 Subsection 14(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-30-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-30
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

31 Schedule
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Repeal the Schedule.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Paragraph 42(2)(e) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner and substitute Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-32-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-32
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using Privacy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

33 Paragraph 53(2)(g) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner, substitute Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-33-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-33
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 Paragraph 510(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-34-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-34
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

35 Paragraph 42(2)(e) of Schedule 1A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Paragraph 53(2)(g) of Schedule 1A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner, substitute Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Paragraph 261AKD(2)(e)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 Paragraph 336E(2)(g)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-38-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-38
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

39 Subsection 135AA(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Privacy Commissioner)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Repeal the definition of Privacy Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Subsection 135AA(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Omit 'written notice', substitute 'legislative instrument'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-40
schema version: 2

41 After subsection 135AA(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Issuing guidelines is a privacy function for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-41
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is an obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Function is an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Issuing guidelines is a function

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 After subsection 135AA(3)

42 Subsection 135AA(4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-42
schema version: 2

43 Subsection 135AA(4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Omit 'written notice', substitute 'legislative instrument'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Subsections 135AA(5A) and (6)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-44
schema version: 2

45 Subsections 135AA(7) to (10)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Guidelines take effect from the first day they are no longer liable to be disallowed, or in accordance with their provision for commencement after that day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 Subsection 135AB(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-46-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-46
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

48 Section 4 (definition of Privacy Commissioner)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Repeal definition of Privacy Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-48
schema version: 2

49 Subparagraphs 61(4)(b)(i) and (ii)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 Paragraphs 20(4A)(b), (c) and (e)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Omit “Privacy Commissioner”, substitute ‘Information Commissioner’.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Paragraphs 61(5)(c) and (d)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-50-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-50
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

51 Subsection 61(6)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-51-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-51
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

52 Subsection 6(1) (definition of Commissioner)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Repeal definition, substitute with new Commissioner definition.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-52
schema version: 2

53 Part IV (heading)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-53
schema version: 2

54 Division 1 of Part IV
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Repeal Division 1 of Part IV
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-54
schema version: 2

55 Subsections 31(4), 32(2) and 36(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Omit “Privacy”.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 Sections 96, 97 and 99
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Repeal sections
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-56-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-56
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals sections
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

57 Introduction to Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Substitute Information Commissioner for Privacy Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-57
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Introduction to Schedule 2

58 Clause 6.1 of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-58
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58 Clause 6.1 of Schedule 2

59 Paragraphs 117(1)(j) and (k)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-59
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Paragraphs 117(1)(j) and (k)

6 Subsection 20(4B)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
schema version: 2

60 Subsection 118(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Substitute Information Commissioner for Privacy Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-60-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-60
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Substitution of terms
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBST

61 Subsection 118(4A)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-61-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-61
schema version: 2

62 Subsection 121(1A)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-62-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-62
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

63 Subsection 122(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-63
schema version: 2

64 Subsection 130(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Substitute Information Commissioner for Privacy Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-64-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-64
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity with new one.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

65 Subsections 134(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-65-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-65
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

66 Paragraph 295M(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Substitute term for Privacy Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-66
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Paragraph 295M(1)(a)

67 Paragraph 295M(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Replace 'Privacy Commissioner' with 'Information Commissioner'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-67-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-67
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace a term
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

68 Section 295ZC
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section heading.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-68
schema version: 2

69 Subsection 309(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner' and substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-69
schema version: 2

7 Section 43A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
note: Replace 'Privacy Commissioner' with 'Information Commissioner'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omission of term
modality: Deontic
operator: omission

70 After subsection 309(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Insertion of privacy function for Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-70
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The function is a privacy function
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Function is a privacy function
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: The Information Commissioner has a function

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70 After subsection 309(1)

71 Subsections 309(2) to (4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-71-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-71
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace entity name
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

72 Subsection 309(5)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Repeal subsection (including note)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-72
schema version: 2

73 Paragraphs 515A(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section 515A heading.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-73-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-73
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

74 Paragraphs 515A(3)(a) and (c)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-74-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-74
schema version: 2

75 Subsection 515A(4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner' and substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-75-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-75
schema version: 2

76 Subsection 183(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-76-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-76
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

77 Paragraph 42(2)(e) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988'.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-77-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-77
schema version: 2

78 Paragraph 53(2)(g) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.139
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner, substitute Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-78-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-78
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8 Section 43A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Substitute Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 for Privacy Act 1988.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

9 Subsections 4(1), (2) and (4)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section 4 heading.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

1 Subsection 4(1) (definition of agency)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: Substitute definition of agency
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of intelligence agency document
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-10
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1)

11 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Defines practical refusal reason
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Subsection 4(1) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Defines who holds or performs duties in a prescribed authority
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-12
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds duty
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Subsection 4(1) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition of

13 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Defines the meaning of 'request consultation process'
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-13
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Subsection 4(1)

138 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-138-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-138
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Omit “or”.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-14
schema version: 2

140 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Exempts certain documents from the operation of the Freedom of Information Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-140
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts documents from FOI operation
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2A) An agency is exempt...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

142 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Methods for postage and electronic communication
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-142-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-142
schema version: 2

144 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Inform applicant and agency or Minister of extension period
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-144-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-144-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-144
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-144-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

146 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Refusal of access to document if practical refusal reason still exists
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-146
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requests relate to documents, the subject matter of which is substantially the same.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requests relate to documents with substantially the same subject matter
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister recognizes multiple requests as a single request.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Agency or Minister recognizes multiple requests as a single request based on subject matter similarity
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister may refuse to give access to the document.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to document if condition exists
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) if, after the request consultation process, the agency or Minister is satisfied that the practical refusal reason still exists—the agency or Minister may refuse to give access to the document in accordance with the request.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requests diffuse into a single request.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requests diffuse into a single request if they relate to substantially the same subject matter
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requests are treated as recurring.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requests are treated as recurring if they relate to the same document or documents
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:

148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 148(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(9) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-148
schema version: 2

148(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Applicant may agree to extend consultation period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

148(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Must provide written notice to agency or Minister within consultation period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Within consultation period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) The applicant must, before the end of the consultation period, do one of the following...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

148(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Failure to consult during the consultation period results in withdrawal of request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation period and processing period overlap.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consultation period overlaps with processing period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The consultation period ends before the end of the processing period.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The withdrawal of the request implies no further action by the applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Withdrawal of request implies no further action by the applicant.
modality: CogAI
operator: Implicates
premise text: The withdrawal of the request results in a change to the status of the applicant.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to do so results in withdrawal of request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult during the consultation period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The applicant must consult the contact person during the consultation period.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The withdrawal of the request diffuses to the contact person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Withdrawal of request diffuses to the contact person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The withdrawal of the request results in a change to the status of the contact person.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation period is until the end of the processing period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consultation period is until the end of the processing period.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The consultation period ends before the end of the processing period.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

148(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Disregard a certain period when calculating the 30-day deadline for an agency's decision on an applicant's request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard period and deadline overlap.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The disregarded period overlaps with the 30-day deadline.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Paragraph 15(5)(b) mentions a 30-day deadline.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard period does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to notify the applicant within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Paragraph 15(5)(b) requires notification.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard period is not allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The agency cannot disregard the period when calculating the deadline.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Paragraph 15(5)(b) requires notification.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disregard period is recurrent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The disregarded period is recurrent in the sense that it happens every time an applicant receives a notice.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: Subsection (2) mentions a notice.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

148(9) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Agency or Minister must undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval during which the obligation applies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes the implication of the obligation on other provisions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how the obligation is recognized by AI systems.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agency or Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how the obligation spreads to other provisions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.

15 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (e) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Repeal a paragraph of the definition of responsible Minister
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15
schema version: 2

150 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-150-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-150
schema version: 2

152 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-152-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-152
schema version: 2

154 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-154-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-154
schema version: 2

15AA Extension of time with agreement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: Agency or Minister may extend period for dealing with request by up to 30 days if applicant agrees in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15aa
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15aa-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AA Extension of time with agreement

15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
has part: 15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ab
schema version: 2

15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: Agency or Minister may apply for extension of time to deal with a request
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests

15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
references: sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-1
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend time
modality: Deontic
operator: may

15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15AC(1) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(2) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(3) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(4) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(5) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(6) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(7) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(8) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(9) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac
schema version: 2

15AC(1) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Agency or Minister must make a decision on request within time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must make a decision on request within time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AC(1) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

15AC(2) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Deemed refusal if decision not made within time period
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on delayed decision-making
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

15AC(3) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Refusal to give access to document without notice
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on the last day of the initial decision period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for refusal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) Subject to this section:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the principal officer of the agency or the Minister is taken to have made a decision personally refusing to give access...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits refusal to give access
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Subject to this section:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: notice of the decision is taken to have been given under section 26...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on giving notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Impose Duty
premise text: (3) Subject to this section:

15AC(4) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Request for further time to deal with the request may be made in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for further time to deal with the request.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to make a request for further time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The agency or Minister concerned may apply in writing to the Information Commissioner.

15AC(5) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Allow further time for agency or Minister to deal with request
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

15AC(6) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Information Commissioner may impose conditions on further time request
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to impose conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

15AC(7) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Agency or Minister may extend time for decision on request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates that agency or Minister may extend time for decision on request.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows agency or Minister to extend time for decision on request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows agency or Minister to extend time for decision on request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Enables agency or Minister to extend time for decision on request.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Enable
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that agency or Minister may extend time for decision on request.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AC(7) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

15AC(8) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Agency/Minister must comply with conditions or face further time not allowed
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No further time allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency/Minister must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: subsection (3) (deemed refusal) applies

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AC(8) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

15AC(9) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: No power to allow further time under this section
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot allow further time
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibited action: allowing further time
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)

16 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Defines subcontractor for Commonwealth contract
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-16
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subcontractor
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity is a party to the contract
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Contracted service provider

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Responsible entity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Entity is responsible for provision of services
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: Subcontractor

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Subsection 4(1)

17 Subsection 4(8)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Section 6B
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Repeal a section
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Before section 7
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Insert clause
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: Definition of Commonwealth contract
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency involvement
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (a) the Commonwealth or an agency is, or was, a party to the contract;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Commonwealth contract means a contract to which all of the following apply:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1)

20 Subsection 7(2A)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Repeal subsection and substitute with new schedule
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(2B) Subsection 7(2B)
has part: 21(2C) Subsection 7(2B)
has part: 21(2D) Subsection 7(2B)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-21
schema version: 2

21(2B) Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Exempts a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to certain documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Subsection 7(2B)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following documents:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exempts a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to documents containing certain information.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exemption
premise text: (2B) A Minister is exempt...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an extract or information from, an intelligence agency document...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents knowledge about exempt documents using a formal ontology.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (a) an intelligence agency document;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the operation of this Act...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2B) A Minister is exempt...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent that it contains such a summary, extract or information...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Restricts the flow of information from intelligence agency documents to Ministers.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Flow
premise text: (a) an intelligence agency document;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following documents:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exempts a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to documents containing certain information.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exemption
premise text: (2B) A Minister is exempt...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2B) Subsection 7(2B)

21(2C) Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Exempts an agency from the operation of this Act in relation to certain defence intelligence documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Subsection 7(2B)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits an agency from operating under this Act in relation to certain defence intelligence documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

21(2D) Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Exempts Minister from operation of Act in relation to specified documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Subsection 7(2B)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Minister from operation of Act in relation to specified documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2D) A Minister is exempt...

22 After paragraph 13(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Insert program or related material into National Film and Sound Archive collection.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 After paragraph 15(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Inserts headings for subsections 15(1) and 15(2)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Paragraphs 15(2)(c) to (e)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Provide details of how notices under this Act may be sent to the applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Agency or Minister must undertake a request consultation process when refusing a document request
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to undertake consultation process
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide details of how notices under this Act may be sent to the applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Paragraphs 15(2)(c) to (e)

24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
has part: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24a
schema version: 2

24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Refusal of document access request due to unavailability or non-existence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and agency's possession
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (i) is in the agency’s or Minister’s possession but cannot be found;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of document access request
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An agency or Minister may refuse a request for access to a document...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Agency may refuse request if document cannot be found or received through contractual measures.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Document receipt must overlap with agency's contractual measures
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency is prohibited from refusing request
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An agency may refuse a request for access to a document if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has obligation to receive document through contractual measures
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) An agency may refuse a request for access to a document if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Agency must recurrently attempt to receive document
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa
schema version: 2

24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: A practical refusal reason exists if the request would substantially and unreasonably divert resources or interfere with functions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request timing based on Minister functions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (ii) in the case of a Minister—would substantially and unreasonably interfere with the performance of the Minister’s functions;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request would substantially divert agency resources.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substantial Diversion
premise text: (i) in the case of an agency—would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request would substantially interfere with Minister functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substantial Interference
premise text: (ii) in the case of a Minister—would substantially and unreasonably interfere with the performance of the Minister’s functions;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request does not satisfy identification requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Non-Compliance with Identification Requirement
premise text: (b) the request does not satisfy the requirement in paragraph 15(2)(b) (identification of documents).

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Request recurrence based on agency/minister operations.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (i) in the case of an agency—would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?

24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Agency or Minister must consider resources for identifying, locating, or collating documents and deciding access to documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider resources.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?

24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Agency or Minister must not consider certain factors when deciding on a practical refusal reason.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider applicant's reasons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to: (a) any reasons that the applicant gives for requesting access;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider their own beliefs.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to: (b) the agency’s or Minister’s belief as to what the applicant’s reasons are for requesting access;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider maximum amount payable.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to: (c) any maximum amount, specified in the regulations, payable as a charge for processing a request of that kind.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?

24AB What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab
schema version: 2

24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Requirement to notify
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?

24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
description: yes
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Agency must provide written notice with details of refusal reason and contact person.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?

24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Agency must assist applicant to revise request if practical refusal reason no longer exists.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency takes reasonable steps to assist applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must assist applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Applicant contacts contact person during consultation period.

24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
note: Defines reasonable steps for a request consultation process.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?

25 After subsection 15(2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
note: Request must be sent to agency or Minister in specified ways
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-25
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 After subsection 15(2)

26 At the end of subsection 15(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: An agency or Minister may refuse to deal with a request if satisfied that a practical refusal reason exists.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-26
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

27 After subsection 15(5)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Agency must consider guidelines when making decisions on requests.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-27-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-27
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision-making process
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 93A

28 Paragraph 15(6)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Omit “to be taken to be”.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-28-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

29 At the end of section 15
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 29(7) At the end of section 15
has part: 29(8) At the end of section 15
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-29
schema version: 2

29(7) At the end of section 15
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Agency or Minister may extend period for request if appropriate to consult foreign government, authority, or international organisation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 29 At the end of section 15

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend period for request
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(7) At the end of section 15

29(8) At the end of section 15
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Agency must inform applicant of extended period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 29 At the end of section 15

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must inform applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(8) At the end of section 15

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: Defines contracted service provider for Commonwealth contracts.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Provides a definition for the term.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)

30 After section 15
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
note: Insert clause after section 15
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-30
schema version: 2

31 Paragraph 17(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-31-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-31
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

32 Section 24
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.149
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Section 24A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-33
schema version: 2

34 Subsection 29(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Omit specified phrase.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-34-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-34
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits application of fee
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

35 Section 30A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Repeal a section
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Section 92A
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Repeal a section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Paragraph 94(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-37
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the applicant being included in one class or another.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Removes the specified phrase from the text.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Remove

38 Division 1 of Part II of Schedule 2 (after the item relating to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Obligation to report or analyze operational intelligence and special access programs.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-38-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-38
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report or analyze operational intelligence and special access programs.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

39 Division 1 of Part II of Schedule 2 (the item relating to the
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Repeal of item relating to Federal Airports Corporation
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-39-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-39
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: Defines defence intelligence document
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Application—items 2, 3, 7, 16, 19 and 33
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Amendments apply in relation to contracts entered into at or after commencement.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-40
schema version: 2

41 Application—items 4, 6, 8, 10 to 13, 17, 20 to 32 and 34 to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Applicable to certain requests and applications under the Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-41
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Application—items 4, 6, 8, 10 to 13, 17, 20 to 32 and 34 to

41A After paragraph 49(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Inserts the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 into the list of entities to be included.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-41a
schema version: 2

41B Subsection 49(3)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Omit “or (c)”, substitute “, (c) or (ca)”.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-41b
schema version: 2

42 Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Omit specified section from Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-42-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-42
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

43 Paragraph 93(3A)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for national security, defence or international relations documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-43
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Paragraph 93(3A)(a)

44 Subparagraph 131AA(4)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Repeal and substitute certain documents with exemptions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-44-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-44
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

45 Paragraph 133(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.157
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for trade secrets and business documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-45-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-45
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

46 Paragraph 135A(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.157
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for national security, defence or international relations documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-46
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Paragraph 135A(4)(a)

47 Paragraph 143(6)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.157
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with exemptions for trade secrets and business documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-47
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47 Paragraph 143(6)(a)

48 Paragraph 146B(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for certain documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-48
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Paragraph 146B(4)(a)

49 Subsection 34(1AA)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Insertion of Division 9 before section 60A
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Department)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of Department
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to define Department
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

50 Paragraph 34(1AA)(a)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Insertion of words in section headings
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-50
schema version: 2

51 Subsection 34(5)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Insert Division 9 of Part VII or
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-51
schema version: 2

52 After paragraph 34(5)(c)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Duty to provide information under Division 9 of Part VII of the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-52
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 After paragraph 34(5)(c)

6 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Allow material maintained for reference purposes that is otherwise publicly available.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow material maintained for reference purposes that is otherwise publicly available.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
has part: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6c
schema version: 2

6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Agency must comply with Commonwealth contract requirements.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
note: Agency must take measures to receive a document from a contracted service provider or subcontractor.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Document was created before the request for access.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The agency must take contractual measures to ensure that the agency receives a document if: (a) the document is created by, or is in the possession of: (i) a contracted service provider for the Commonwealth contract; or (ii) a subcontractor for the Commonwealth contract;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take measures.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must receive the document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The agency must take contractual measures to ensure that the agency receives a document if: (a) the document is created by, or is in the possession of: (i) a contracted service provider for the Commonwealth contract; or (ii) a subcontractor for the Commonwealth contract;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Document was created before the request for access.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The agency must take contractual measures to ensure that the agency receives a document if: (a) the document is created by, or is in the possession of: (i) a contracted service provider for the Commonwealth contract; or (ii) a subcontractor for the Commonwealth contract;

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

7 Subsection 4(1) (definition of document of an agency)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of document of an agency
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Contractual measures timing
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: In order to comply with section 6C, the agency has taken contractual measures.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency possession
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: The document is in the possession of the agency.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency possession condition
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) The document is in the possession of the agency.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Contractual measures condition
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (b) In order to comply with section 6C, the agency has taken contractual measures.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Subsection 4(1) (definition of document of an agency)

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of electronic communication
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

9 Subsection 4(1) (definition of eligible case manager)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Repeal definition of eligible case manager
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 November 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-10
schema version: 2

1 November 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Table of Amendments
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-11
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal commencement

1 November
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 May 2011
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00866
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 November
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 May 2011
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 November
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-7
schema version: 2

1 November
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Note on table expansion
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-8
schema version: 2

1 Definitions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.159
note: Definitions for Schedule 7
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Same meaning as in those Acts
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Expressions used in this Schedule are also used in the new law and Privacy Act 1988

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Same meaning as in that Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Expressions used in this Schedule are also used in the Freedom of Information Act 1982

10 Privacy Advisory Committee giving advice to Privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Committee must advise Privacy Commissioner under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Committee must advise Privacy Commissioner after commencement day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Committee did not advise Privacy Commissioner before commencement day

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Committee must advise Privacy Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide advice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Committee was requested to advise Privacy Commissioner

11 Investigations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Investigation completion transfer from Privacy Commissioner to Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer of investigation responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: Transfer
premise text: (1) and (2)

12 Requirement to give evidence or hold conference etc.
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Must provide evidence or information to the Information Commissioner on the same basis as required by the Privacy Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must provide the evidence, information or document to the Information Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Privacy Commissioner required a person to provide evidence, information or any document; and

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must attend the conference if the conference is: presided over by the Information Commissioner; and held on or after the commencement day; and held in accordance with section 46 of the Privacy Act 1988.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attend conference
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Privacy Commissioner directed a person to attend a conference under section 46 of the Privacy Act 1988; and

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Requirement to give evidence or hold conference etc.

13 Applications on foot as part of investigation proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Application for investigation proceeding must be determined by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for investigation proceeding must be determined.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Applications on foot as part of investigation proceeding

14 Conference convened, but not held
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.167
note: Conference convened, but not held
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Submissions invited, but not received, by Privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.167
note: Submissions invited by Privacy Commissioner after commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-15
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Submission was made after commencement day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between submission and commencement day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: Submissions were not made before commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Privacy Commissioner must receive submissions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to receive submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Submissions were not made before commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Submissions invited, but not received, by Privacy

156 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-156-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-156
schema version: 2

158 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-158-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-158
schema version: 2

16 References in instruments
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: Instrument references Privacy Commissioner, with effect changed to Information Commissioner on commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Section 16
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Commencement of item 23 of Schedule 3 to the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval specified in the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between instrument references and commencement day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) The instrument has effect on and after the commencement day as if the reference to the Privacy Commissioner were a reference to the Information Commissioner.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Automated inference of instrument references
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: (a) an instrument is in force immediately before the commencement day; and (b) the instrument contains a reference to the Privacy Commissioner.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister may, by written instrument, determine that subitem (1) does not apply in relation to a specified reference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to update instrument references
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) an instrument is in force immediately before the commencement day; and (2) the instrument contains a reference to the Privacy Commissioner.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information Commissioner's authority diffused from Privacy Commissioner
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) The instrument has effect on and after the commencement day as if the reference to the Privacy Commissioner were a reference to the Information Commissioner.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Instrument references repeated on commencement day
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by written instrument, determine that subitem (1) does not apply in relation to a specified reference.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 References in instruments

160 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Respond to the Information Commissioner within a certain timeframe after commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-160
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty to respond.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 160 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

162 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-162-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-162
schema version: 2

164 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-164-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-164
schema version: 2

166 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-166-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-166
schema version: 2

168 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-168-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-168
schema version: 2

17 Reporting requirements
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: The Information Commissioner must provide a report in relation to so much of the period as occurs before the commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-17
schema version: 2

17 Section 17
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Commencement of Schedule 4 to the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-17-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Schedule 4
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement time specified in the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a duty to commence Schedule 4
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No explicit obligation or prohibition

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide a report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Reporting requirements

172 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Commencement information for provisions of the Statute Law Revision Act 2012
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-172-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-172
schema version: 2

18 Substitution of Information Commissioner as a party to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Substitution of Information Commissioner as a party to pending proceedings
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Reviews, examinations etc. by Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Continuation of actions by Privacy Commissioner upon commencement day
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-19-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
modality: Deontic
operator: ImmediatelyAfter

2 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Continuation of Privacy Commissioner appointment
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the balance of the person’s term of appointment that remained immediately before the commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with the person's term of appointment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlap
premise text: (1) The person holding office as the Privacy Commissioner under section 19A of the old law immediately before the commencement day is taken to have been appointed...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the balance of the person’s term of appointment that remained immediately before the commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inferential application of the provision
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
premise text: (1) The person holding office as the Privacy Commissioner under section 19A of the old law immediately before the commencement day is taken to have been appointed...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is taken to have been appointed...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues the appointment of the Privacy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: continuation
premise text: The person holding office as the Privacy Commissioner...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is taken to have been appointed...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the appointment of the Privacy Commissioner
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (3) This item does not prevent those terms and conditions being varied after the commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is taken to have been appointed...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of the Privacy Commissioner's appointment
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
premise text: (2) The Privacy Commissioner is taken to have been appointed on the same terms and conditions as applied immediately before the commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Privacy Commissioner

20 Review of adjudicator’s decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: The Privacy Commissioner must complete a review of an adjudicator's decision if the review was not completed before the commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-20
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Privacy Commissioner must complete the review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Review of adjudicator’s decisions

21 Conference convened, but not held
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Conference convened, but not held
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Conference held, but determination not made, by Privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Determination must be made by Privacy Commissioner after conference.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Sept 2012
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.175
note: Notes to the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Conference held, but determination not made, by Privacy

23 Records etc. of Office of the Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Conditional commencement of records for Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Disclosure of private information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Continues to apply previous section's provisions for conduct engaged before commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-24
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: continues

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Disclosure of private information

25 Failure to appear before, or give information to, the
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Failure to appear before or give information to the Privacy Commissioner is prohibited if a provision of the Privacy Act 1988 applied to the person before the commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-25
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conduct on and after commencement day is related to conduct before commencement day by temporal relation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct before and after commencement day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conduct on and after commencement day is classified as prohibited by CogAI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of conduct as prohibited by CogAI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to appear or provide information on and after commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to appear or provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to appear or provide information on and after commencement day is diffused to all persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to appear or provide information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conduct on and after commencement day is part of recurring trace of conduct before commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct before and after commencement day.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Failure to appear before, or give information to, the

26 Saving of existing delegations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Delegations under section 99 of the Privacy Act 1988 continue to have effect under new law.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-ltl-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-cogai-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-26
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect as if it were a delegation under section 25 on and after the commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between delegations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect on and after the commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect as if it were a delegation under section 25 on and after the commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conditional relationship between delegations
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect on and after the commencement day.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect as if it were a delegation under section 25.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional relationship between delegations
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect if it were a delegation under section 25.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 does not continue to have effect after the commencement day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between delegations
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect until the commencement day.

27 Regulations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: Regulations may be prescribed by Governor-General
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-27-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-27
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General has permission to prescribe regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: May

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commences on the day after the end of a 6-month period following the commencement of section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in a Schedule
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 Staff
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Existing agreements apply after employee transfer
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agreements continue in effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: Subitem (2) applies if...

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Staff

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies a temporal relationship between two intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: 6 months beginning on the day section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement based on the commencement of another provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement based on another provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement based on another provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: then
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies a temporal relationship between two intervals.
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: 6 months beginning on the day section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.

31 May 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-31
schema version: 2

31 May 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.175
note: See s. 2(1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-31-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-31-2
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4 Consultants
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Consultant engagement transferred to Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer of consultant engagement
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (1)

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Consultants

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
modality: Deontic
operator: ImmediatelyAfter

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commences on the day after the end of a 6-month period, unless section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 does not commence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Things done by, or in relation to, Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Things done by Privacy Commissioner before commencement day are taken to have been done by Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take actions from Privacy Commissioner to Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: Privacy Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Same purpose
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Same purpose for actions done by Privacy Commissioner and Information Commissioner
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: same purpose
premise text: Purpose

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Things done by, or in relation to, Privacy Commissioner

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence within a temporal interval of at least 6 months from the commencement of section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The provision(s) commence on the day after the end of a 6-month period.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence on the day after the end of a 6-month period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to commence the provision(s) on the day after the end of a 6-month period, unless section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 does not commence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a prohibition on commencing the provision(s) unless section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: if-not
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 does not commence.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision(s) have a recurring trace that starts on the day after the end of a 6-month period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: The provision(s) commence on the day after the end of a 6-month period.

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Consultations by, and with, Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Continuation of consultation by Information Commissioner after commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
modality: Deontic
operator: ImmediatelyAfter

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedules 4 to commence immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Comments sought, but not received, by Privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Commissioner must seek views before making a decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seeking views before making a decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide views
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commissioner gave a notice

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Comments sought, but not received, by Privacy

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the commencement of section 3.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

8 Approval sought from, but not given by, Privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Approval sought from Privacy Commissioner before commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must give approval in accordance with the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to seek approval from Privacy Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The approval of the Privacy Commissioner was sought under a provision of an Act.

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Approval sought from, but not given by, Privacy

9 Decisions made, but not implemented, by Privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Commissioner must implement decision made before commencement day.
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Implement decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide implementation step
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Privacy Commissioner made a decision

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...being satisfied of a matter
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Decision includes forming a view or being satisfied of a matter
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Make a decision includes...

Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the law relating to access to information, and for related purposes
identifier: No. 51 of 2010
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU