Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 51 of 2010
description: An Act to amend the law relating to access to information, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Temporal commencement
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-31
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-31-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-2
note: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ImmediatelyAfter
logic summary: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 November
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-3-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
note: Commences on the day after the end of a 6-month period following the commencement of section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional commencement based on the commencement of another provision.
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Specifies a temporal relationship between two intervals.
premise text: 6 months beginning on the day section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Specifies a temporal relationship between two intervals.
premise text: 6 months beginning on the day section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional commencement based on another provision.
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: then
logic summary: Conditional commencement based on another provision.
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence at this time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 May 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-4
note: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00866
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-4-norm

2 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-3
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-3-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
note: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ImmediatelyAfter
logic summary: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 November
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-5-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
note: Commences on the day after the end of a 6-month period, unless section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 does not commence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional commencement
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence on the day after the end of a 6-month period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The provision(s) commence on the day after the end of a 6-month period.
conclusion text: The provision(s) commence within a temporal interval of at least 6 months from the commencement of section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: The provision(s) commence on the day after the end of a 6-month period.
conclusion text: The provision(s) have a recurring trace that starts on the day after the end of a 6-month period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to commence the provision(s) on the day after the end of a 6-month period, unless section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 does not commence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-not
logic summary: Conditional prohibition
premise text: Section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 does not commence.
conclusion text: There is a prohibition on commencing the provision(s) unless section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 commences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 May 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-6-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
note: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ImmediatelyAfter
logic summary: Commences immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 November
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-7-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
note: Schedules 4 to commence immediately after section 3 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the commencement of section 3.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 November
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-8
note: Note on table expansion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-8-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3-2
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in a Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-2-norm

4 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-2-norm

1 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm

3 Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
has part: 3(1) Objects—general
has part: 3(2) Objects—general
has part: 3(3) Objects—general
has part: 3(4) Objects—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8

3(1) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-1
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Require agencies to publish information and provide a right of access to documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(1) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
logic summary: Entailment of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(2) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-2
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Promote public participation in Government processes and scrutiny of activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(2) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Promote public participation
premise text: (2) The Parliament intends...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(3) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-3
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Increase recognition of information held by the Government for public purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-3-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(3) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3(4) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-ss-4
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Parliament intends to facilitate and promote public access to information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(4) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a
has part: 3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
has part: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8

3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
note: Prohibition on publishing or giving access to information or documents apart from under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on publishing or giving access to information or documents apart from under this Act.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Minister, or an officer of an agency, has the power to publish, or give access to, information or a document (including an exempt document) apart from under this Act.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
note: The Parliament does not intend to limit the power of publication or access.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Repeal section 14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm

6 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Definition of operational information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 4(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Omit specific phrase from Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
premise text: Omit ‘of this Act (other than sections 8 and 93)”.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Part II
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Repeal Part and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-3-norm

7A Information publication scheme—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7a
note: An agency must publish a plan and range of information on its website.
description: Information about the agency's operations, including operational information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7A Information publication scheme—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must publish information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
has part: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.11

8(1) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?
note: Agency must prepare a plan showing information to be published.
description: Information that must be published
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must prepare a plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?
note: Agency must publish certain information.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2
has part: 8(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 8(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 8(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12

8(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-3
part of: 8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-3-norm

8(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4
part of: 8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency must publish other information held by the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5
part of: 8 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency must have regard to objects of Act and guidelines when performing functions under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must have regard to objects of Act and guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8a
has part: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
has part: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13

8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
note: Agency must provide operational information to the public.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide operational information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue
logic summary: Operational information is held by the agency.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
note: Agency must publish operational information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide operational information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must be published
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must be published
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public using AI-powered tools
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8b
note: Agency must ensure information accuracy, completeness, and timeliness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must ensure information accuracy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8C Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8c
has part: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
has part: 8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13

8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions
note: Publication of exempt matter is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of exempt matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions
note: Agency exempt from publishing information under Part if enactment restricts or prohibits publication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Agency exempt from publishing information under Part if enactment restricts or prohibits publication.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Section applies despite section 8.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Section imposes obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d
has part: 8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14

8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Publish required or permitted information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency must publish information to the public and particular classes of persons or entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must publish information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency must publish information on a website.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency has permission to impose charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Charge applies during reproduction costs or incidental costs
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Charge applies until person accesses information directly
premise text: (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for specific reproduction costs, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-then
logic summary: Charge applies if person does not directly access information
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: If-then
logic summary: Charge applies if specific conditions met
premise text: (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for specific reproduction costs, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency must publish details of charge for accessing information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has a duty to publish details of charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8e
note: The Information Commissioner must assist agencies in identifying and preparing required information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must assist agencies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8f
note: The Information Commissioner has functions to review and monitor the operation of the information publication scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Agency must review information publication scheme annually or within 5 years after last review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Review of scheme—by agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must perform review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Conditional commencement of review process within 5 years after section commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for review process commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A Functions and powers under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9a
note: Must have regard to objects of the Act and guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: Must consider objects of the Act and guidelines.
premise text: Objects of this Act
conclusion text: Guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a relation between temporal intervals.
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of a power
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined by this Part
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2
has part: 10(1) Unpublished operational information
has part: 10(2) Unpublished operational information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16

10(1) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information
note: Publishing unpublished operational information is required by the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1) Unpublished operational information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must publish unpublished operational information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information
note: Avoid prejudice from unpublished information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(2) Unpublished operational information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits subjecting person to prejudice
premise text: (2) The person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10a
has part: 10A(1) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
has part: 10A(2) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17

10A(1) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1
part of: 10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
note: Function or power given to an agency may be performed by principal officer or authorized officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to perform function
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10A(2) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2
part of: 10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
note: Regulations apply to the performance or exercise of agency functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10A(2) Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-10a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regulation
logic summary: Regulations impose obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Saving—unpublished information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Continues in force certain sections of the Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.17
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Saving—unpublished information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES_IN_FORCE
logic summary: Continues in force certain sections of the Freedom of Information Act 1982
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-2-sec-14-norm

1 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Defines open access period for records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-norm

2 Subsection 3(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Defines open access period for records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-2-norm

31 December):
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
note: Record must be in open access period on and after the specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 December):
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide open access to records
premise text: The record is in the open access period on and after the specified day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January in the year that is 31 years after
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-2
note: Defines open access period for records created in a certain year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-2-norm

1 January 2011.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-3
note: Reference year for certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-3-norm

1 January 2012.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-4
note: Reference to years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-4-norm

1 January 2013.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-5
note: Reference to years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-5-norm

1 January 2014.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-6
note: Reference year for certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-6-norm

1 January 2015.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-7
note: Reference year for certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-7-norm

1 January 2016.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-8
note: Open access period for records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-8-norm

31 December):
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-2
note: Open access period after a specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-2-norm

1 January 2017.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-9
note: Reference to years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-9-norm

1 January 2018.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-10
note: Range of years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-10-norm

1 January 2019.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-11
note: Range of years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-11-norm

1 January 2020.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-12-norm

1 January 2021.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-13
note: Creation year after January 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-13-norm

1 January in the year that is 21 years after
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-14
note: Defines open access period for records created in the year after creation year
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-14-norm

3 Subsection 22A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Substitute table for determining open access period of Cabinet notebooks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-3-norm

31 December):
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-3
note: Cabinet notebook must be in open access after a certain year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 December):
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: The Cabinet notebook is in the open access period.
conclusion text: After a certain year, it must be in the open access period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January in the year that is 51 years after
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-15
note: Open access period for Cabinet notebooks created in a specific year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-15-norm

1 January 2010.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-16
note: Range of years for a specific purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-16-norm

1 January 2011.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-17
note: References years 1963, 1964 or 1965
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-17-norm

1 January 2012.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-18
note: Range of years for a purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-18-norm

1 January 2013.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-19
note: Range of years for a purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-19-norm

1 January 2014.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-20
note: Exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-20-norm

16 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Open access period for Cabinet notebooks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in the provision
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 December):
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-4
note: Cabinet notebook open access period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-4-norm

1 January 2015.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-21
note: Range of years for applicability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-21-norm

1 January 2016.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-22
note: Range of years for applicability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-22-norm

1 January 2017.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-23
note: Range of years for a purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-23-norm

1 January 2018.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-24
note: Range of years for certain purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-24-norm

1 January 2019.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-25
note: Range of years for a purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-25-norm

1 January 2020.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-26
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-26-norm

1 January 2021.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-27
note: Defines a year after creation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-27-norm

1 January in the year that is 31 years after
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-28
note: Open access period for Cabinet notebooks created in a specific year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-28-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-28-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-28-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: Temporal reference to a specific year
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2022.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-29
note: Open access periods for non-Cabinet notebooks differ from general records and Census information records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-1-29-norm

4 Paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Substitute 15 years for 25 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Paragraph 27(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Omit '25 years', substitute '15 years'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 30(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Substitute 15 years for 25 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Defines Cabinet committee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Cabinet notebook)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Substitute notes with a condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Access must be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 4(1) (definition of edited copy)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Repeals definition of edited copy and substitutes with a new definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-10-norm

11 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Repeal a paragraph and substitute it with a new definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of exempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Repeal an existing provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Condition for running out of review or appeal opportunities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.21
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-12-norm

18 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
note: Time limits for applying for reviews of decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-6

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must apply within time limit
premise text: (a) the latest time for applying for an internal review or an IC review in relation to the decision has ended, if the person has not applied for either review;
conclusion text: The person must apply for a review within the time limit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conclude internal review and IC review proceedings
premise text: (b) if the person has applied for an internal review in relation to the decision: (i) the internal review is concluded; and (ii) the time for applying for an IC review of the decision on internal review has ended, if the person has not applied for the IC review;
conclusion text: The internal review and IC review proceedings must be concluded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conclude IC review proceedings and Federal Court appeal proceedings
premise text: (c) if the person has applied for an IC review in relation to the decision: (i) proceedings in relation to the IC review are concluded; and (ii) the time for applying to the Tribunal for a review in relation to the decision has ended, if the person has not applied for such a review; or (iii) the time for instituting an appeal to the Federal Court in relation to the IC review has ended (with no appeal instituted), or, if an appeal has been instituted, all proceedings in relation to the appeal have been concluded;
conclusion text: The IC review and Federal Court appeal proceedings must be concluded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conclude Tribunal review proceedings and Federal Court appeal proceedings
premise text: (d) if the person has applied to the Tribunal for a review in relation to the decision: (i) proceedings in relation to the review are concluded; and (ii) the time for instituting an appeal to the Federal Court in relation to the review by the Tribunal has ended (with no appeal instituted), or, if an appeal has been instituted, all proceedings in relation to the appeal have been concluded.
conclusion text: The Tribunal review proceedings and Federal Court appeal proceedings must be concluded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Must not apply for IC review after internal review is concluded
premise text: (b) if the person has applied for an internal review in relation to the decision: (i) the internal review is concluded; and (ii) the time for applying for an IC review of the decision on internal review has ended, if the person has not applied for the IC review;
conclusion text: The person must not apply for an IC review after the internal review is concluded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Must not institute Federal Court appeal after IC review is concluded
premise text: (c) if the person has applied for an IC review in relation to the decision: (i) proceedings in relation to the IC review are concluded; and (ii) the time for applying to the Tribunal for a review in relation to the decision has ended, if the person has not applied for such a review; or (iii) the time for instituting an appeal to the Federal Court in relation to the IC review has ended (with no appeal instituted), or, if an appeal has been instituted, all proceedings in relation to the appeal have been concluded;
conclusion text: The person must not institute a Federal Court appeal after the IC review is concluded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 At the end of section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Exemptions for foreign governments and international organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide exemptions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Classification of exempt entities
premise text: Government of the Commonwealth, or an authority of the Commonwealth
conclusion text: foreign government or an international organisation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 After section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Insert clause after section 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-14-norm

11A Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a
has part: 11A(1) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(2) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(3) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(4) Access to documents on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23

11A(1) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1
part of: 11A Access to documents on request
note: Request for access to documents must be made in accordance with subsection 15(2) and any required charge paid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A(1) Access to documents on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access to documents upon request
premise text: Request for access is made in accordance with subsection 15(2)
conclusion text: Access must be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must pay required charge before access is given
premise text: Any charge that, under the regulations, is required to be paid has been paid
conclusion text: Charge must be paid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Request must be made within a certain timeframe
premise text: Request is made in accordance with subsection 15(2)
conclusion text: Request is made within a certain timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Request must be made within a certain interval of time
premise text: Request is made in accordance with subsection 15(2)
conclusion text: Request is made within a certain interval of time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Request for access is a type of request that can be shared
premise text: Request is made by a person, in accordance with subsection 15(2)
conclusion text: Request is a type of request that can be shared
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11A(2) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request
note: Mandatory access—general rule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A(2) Access to documents on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: General rule for mandatory access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11A(3) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3
part of: 11A Access to documents on request
note: Agency or Minister must provide access to document upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A(3) Access to documents on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11A(4) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4
part of: 11A Access to documents on request
note: Agency/Minister not required to provide access to exempt document at a particular time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A(4) Access to documents on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency/Minister has an obligation to provide access to documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
has part: 20(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 20(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24

20(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20-ss-5
part of: 20 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Access to a conditionally exempt document is prohibited unless access would be in balance with the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of access to a conditionally exempt document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20-ss-6
part of: 20 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: No obligation to provide access to exempt documents at a particular time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11B Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b
has part: 11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(5) Public interest exemptions—factors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24

11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-1
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Public interest exemptions—factors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-1-norm

11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Factors favoring access are not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-2-norm

11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Factors that must not be taken into account when deciding access to a document would be contrary to the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excluded
logic summary: Excluded from consideration
premise text: (4) The following factors must not be taken into account...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11B(5) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Agency must consider guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner when determining access to a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11B(5) Public interest exemptions—factors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency has an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Before section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-15-norm

11C Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11c
note: Publication of personal or business information is exempt from access under section 11A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.25
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Publication of personal or business information is prohibited.
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Publication is restricted during reasonable periods.
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Publication is restricted during recurring periods.
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restricted
logic summary: Publication is restricted through controlled channels.
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-11c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Controlled
logic summary: Publication is controlled through AI-powered moderation.
premise text: Personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
conclusion text: Information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
has part: 22(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 22(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26

22(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-2
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c) by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

22(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-3
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Publish information to the public on a website.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-4
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency has permission to impose charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Charge applies only when accessing through website
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Charge applies only when accessing through website
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Charge is for reimbursement of specific costs
premise text: (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for a specific reproduction cost, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: For
logic summary: Charge applies only when accessing through website
premise text: (a) the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and (b) the charge is to reimburse the agency for a specific reproduction cost, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

22(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-5
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency or Minister must publish charge details for accessing information.
description: charge details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must publish charge details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-6
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Comply with the section within 10 working days after access to a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-ss-7
part of: 22 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Definition of working day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Section 18
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16-2
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-16-2-norm

17 Section 22
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-17-norm

22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-2
note: Agency or Minister may prepare edited copy of document for access under section 11A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.27
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Agency or Minister permits access to edited copy of document.
premise text: it is possible for the agency or Minister to prepare a copy (an edited copy) of the document, modified by deletions
conclusion text: access to the edited copy would be required to be given under section 11A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Agency or Minister has a temporal interval for preparing edited copy.
premise text: it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to prepare the edited copy, having regard to
conclusion text: the resources available to modify the document;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Agency or Minister has a recurring trace of preparing edited copies.
premise text: it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to prepare the edited copy, having regard to
conclusion text: the resources available to modify the document;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency or Minister has an obligation to provide access to edited copy.
premise text: it is not apparent (from the request or from consultation with the applicant) that the applicant would decline access to the edited copy.
conclusion text: access to the edited copy would be required to be given under section 11A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
has part: 24(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 24(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 24(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28

24(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-ss-2
part of: 24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency or Minister must provide edited copy to applicant.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide edited copy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-ss-3
part of: 24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Notice must be given to applicant regarding deletions and exemptions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-ss-4
part of: 24 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency or Minister must provide notice in writing to applicant upon request.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must provide notice in writing to applicant upon request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsections 25(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-2
note: Omit 'or 33A'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-18-2-norm

19 At the end of paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Add “and” at the end of paragraph 26(1)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 At the end of paragraph 26(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20 After paragraph 26(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20-2
note: Public interest factors must be included in reasons for refusing access to a conditionally exempt document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 After paragraph 26(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Public interest factors must be included in reasons for refusing access to a conditionally exempt document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Sections 26A, 27, 27A and 28
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
note: Repeal sections and substitute with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00866
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-21-norm

26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a
has part: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29

26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
note: Request for access to document must be made if arrangements have been entered into between the Commonwealth and a State about consultation under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Request for access to document must be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
note: Consultation required before granting access to document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of decision without consultation.
premise text: Decision to give access
conclusion text: Consultation required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
note: Agency/Minister must give written notice of decision to State and Applicant after consultation.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency/Minister must give written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
note: Access to document not given until review or appeal opportunities have run out.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Cannot give access to document until review or appeal opportunities have run out.
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet run out.
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Review or appeal opportunities must run out before access can be given.
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet ended.
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Access to document will eventually be given if review or appeal opportunities run out.
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet ended.
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The decision to give access is diffused through the internal review process.
premise text: Internal review process has been initiated.
conclusion text: Decision to give access may still stand or be confirmed.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: The agency or Minister must infer that the decision to give access is final after review or appeal opportunities have run out.
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have not yet ended.
conclusion text: Access to document should be given.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
has part: 27(1) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(2) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(3) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(4) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(5) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(6) Consultation—business documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30

27(1) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-1
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Agency or Minister must consult with the person concerned before granting access to a document containing business information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consult with the person concerned.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Must provide information about business or professional affairs.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(2) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(3) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-3
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Agency must consider certain matters when determining exemption contention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(3) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to consider certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(4) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-4
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Agency must consult with person or organisation before granting access to document.
description: Submissions in support of exemption contention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(4) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency must take action before granting access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(5) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-5
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Agency must give person or organisation a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(5) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must give person or organisation a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(6) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-ss-6
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Time limits for processing requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-ss-6-norm

28 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
has part: 28(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 28(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.32

28(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-6
part of: 28 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Written notice must be given to the person and applicant before access is granted.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Timing of written notice
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,
conclusion text: Access not to be given until review or appeal opportunities have run out
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of written notice on access
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,
conclusion text: Access will not be given until review or appeal opportunities have run out
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spread of written notice
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of written notice by AI systems
premise text: (6) If the agency or Minister decides to give access to the document,
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-7
part of: 28 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Refusal to provide access to document without review or appeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Agency or Minister cannot give access to document without review or appeal
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Review or appeal opportunities must overlap with decision to give access to document
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Access to document is granted until review or appeal opportunities are exhausted
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Until
logic summary: Access to document is granted until review or appeal opportunities are exhausted
premise text: Review or appeal opportunities have run out
conclusion text: Decision to give access still stands or is confirmed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Document access decision is subject to internal review and review by the Information Commissioner
premise text: Internal review (Part VI) and review by the Information Commissioner (see Note 1)
conclusion text: Decision to give access to document is subject to these reviews
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a
has part: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
has part: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
has part: 27A(3) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33

27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
note: Agency must consult with the person concerned before granting access to a document containing personal information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must consult with the person concerned.
premise text: Request for access to a document containing personal information.
conclusion text: Consultation is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Consultation must occur before granting access to the document.
premise text: Granting access to a document containing personal information.
conclusion text: Consultation is required before granting access.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
note: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters when determining whether to grant an exemption.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters.
premise text: (2) In determining, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), whether the person concerned might reasonably wish to make an exemption contention because of personal information in a document...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(3) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
note: Agency must consult applicant before granting access to document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(3) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory consultation requirement
premise text: Agency decision to grant access
conclusion text: Consult applicant first
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
has part: 30(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 30(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 30(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34

30(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-4
part of: 30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency must give person a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must give person a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of exemption contention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Opportunity to make submissions must occur during processing request.
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) only applies if it is reasonably practicable for the agency or Minister to give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in support of the exemption contention, having regard to all the circumstances
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-5
part of: 30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Written notice must be given to the person concerned and the applicant before access is granted.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-6
part of: 30 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Cannot give access to document after review or appeal opportunities have run out.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot give access to document
premise text: Agency or Minister must not give access to document
conclusion text: No access to document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Review and appeal opportunities have run out
premise text: Review and appeal opportunities for the person concerned started before this point
conclusion text: Review and appeal opportunities have run out
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Cannot give access to document after review or appeal opportunities have run out
premise text: Agency or Minister must not give access to document unless review and appeal opportunities have run out
conclusion text: No access to document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Before section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-22-3-norm

31A Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31a
note: Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents is not required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.35
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
note: Access to edited copy of exempt document must be given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Granting access to edited copy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31b
note: A document is exempt if it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23 Section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
note: Insertion of conditional exemption clause after 'exempt documents'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-23-norm

24 After section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-24-2-norm

25 At the end of section 33
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
note: See also subsection 4(10)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-25-norm

26 Sections 33A to 36
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-2
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-26-2-norm

34 Cabinet documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
has part: 34(1) Cabinet documents
has part: 34(2) Cabinet documents
has part: 34(3) Cabinet documents
has part: 34(4) Cabinet documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37

34(1) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Cabinet documents
note: A document is exempt if it was submitted to the Cabinet for consideration or proposed by a Minister to be so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) Cabinet documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Exempts documents submitted to the Cabinet for consideration.
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Cabinet documents
note: A document is exempt to the extent it contains an extract from a related document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: contains
logic summary: Exemption based on content
premise text: Document is exempt if it contains an extract from a related document.
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it contains an extract from a related document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption based on temporal relation to other documents
premise text: Document is exempt if it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
conclusion text: Document is exempt to the extent it is a copy or part of, or contains an extract from, a document during which subsection (1) applies.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Cabinet documents
note: Disclose Cabinet deliberations or decisions unless officially disclosed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(3) Cabinet documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose Cabinet deliberations or decisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(4) Cabinet documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-4
part of: 34 Cabinet documents
note: A document is not exempt only because it is attached to an exempt document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.37
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(4) Cabinet documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-2
has part: 34(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 34(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38

34(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5
part of: 34 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: A document by which a decision of the Cabinet is officially published is not an exempt document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
conclusion text: The document must be published officially.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6
part of: 34 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Disclosure of factual information is not exempt if it reveals a Cabinet deliberation or decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose factual information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Sections 39, 40 and 41
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27-2
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-27-2-norm

28 Subsection 42(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2
has part: 28(2) Subsection 42(2)
has part: 28(3) Subsection 42(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38

28(2) Subsection 42(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2
part of: 28 Subsection 42(2)
note: Waiver of legal professional privilege claim
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Waive
logic summary: Releasing a claim
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Subsection 42(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3
part of: 28 Subsection 42(2)
note: Document containing operational information is not exempt under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of exemption
premise text: Document is exempt under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Document is not exempt under subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

29 Sections 43, 43A and 44
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 45(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-2
note: Substitute a document to which subsection 47C(1) applies with a document that would apply but for subsections 47C(2) or (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Subsection 45(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace a document with another that meets certain conditions.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Subsection 45(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-5
note: Insertion of phrase after certain words
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-31-5-norm

32 Section 47
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-2
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-32-2-norm

47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47
has part: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39

47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
note: Disclosures of trade secrets or commercially valuable information are exempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to keep trade secrets or commercially valuable information confidential.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain types of requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-2-norm

47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
note: Reference to an undertaking carried on by the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47-ss-3-norm

33 At the end of Part IV
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
note: Exemptions added at the end of Part IV
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-33-norm

36 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-norm

47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47b
note: Conditional exemptions for documents that may damage relations between the Commonwealth and a State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect relations between the Commonwealth and a State.
premise text: Disclosure of the document under this Act:
conclusion text: may damage relations between the Commonwealth and a State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on divulging confidential information.
premise text: would divulge information or matter communicated in confidence by or on behalf of the Government of a State or an authority of a State, to the Government of the Commonwealth, to an authority of the Commonwealth or to a person receiving the communication on behalf of the Commonwealth or of an authority of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Conditional exemptions apply to documents that overlap with this interval.
premise text: disclosure of the document under this Act:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c
has part: 47C(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
has part: 47C(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
has part: 47C(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40

47C(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c-ss-1
part of: 47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
note: Conditional exemptions for deliberative processes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-1-norm

47C(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2
part of: 47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
note: Agency must publish operational information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47C(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Publishing is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47C(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3
part of: 47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
note: Exemptions from the public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47C(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47D Public interest conditional exemptions—financial or property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47d
note: Conditional exemptions for documents with substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Imposes obligation to access conditionally exempt documents with public interest exception
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for conditional exemption
premise text: Disclosure under this Act would have substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests if disclosure is made within a certain time period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines trace for conditionally exempt documents
premise text: A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would have substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Applies to access control for conditionally exempt documents
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47d-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Applies to AI systems for conditional exemption
premise text: A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would have substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47E Public interest conditional exemptions—certain operations of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47e
note: Conditional exemptions for certain operations of agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prejudice the effectiveness of procedures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-norm

47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f
has part: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(4) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(5) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(6) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(7) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42

47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Disclosure of personal information without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Uncertainty
logic summary: Discloses personal information may be uncertain.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Conditionally exempt from disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Agency or Minister must consider certain matters when determining whether disclosure of document would involve unreasonable disclosure of personal information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency or Minister has an obligation to consider certain matters.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a temporal interval.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a recurring trace.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a diffusion.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Excerpt specifies a CogAI.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47F(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-3
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Request for access to a document does not trigger subsection (1) effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-3-norm

47F(4) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Disclosure of personal information may be prohibited if it is detrimental to the applicant's physical or mental health, or well-being.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information under certain conditions.
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between disclosure and potential harm to the applicant.
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of potential harm to the applicant.
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Containment
logic summary: Requires containment of potential harm to the applicant within a specific scope.
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Requires analysis of potential harm to the applicant by a qualified person.
premise text: The disclosure of the information to the applicant might be detrimental to the applicant’s physical or mental health, or well-being.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47F(5) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Access to document may be given to qualified person nominated by applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Minister may direct access to document
conclusion text: Access granted to qualified person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47F(6) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-6
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Conditional exercise of agency powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-6-norm

47F(7) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Definition of qualified person for conditional exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47F(7) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of qualified person for conditional exemptions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47f-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
premise text: None
conclusion text: qualified person is defined by occupation and profession
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47g
note: Conditional exemptions for business information disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.43
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47g-norm

40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40
has part: 40(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 40(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 40(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 40(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44

40(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Exemption from Freedom of Information Act for trade secrets and other information under section 47.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts trade secrets and other information under section 47 from Freedom of Information Act.
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Trade secrets and other information under section 47 overlap with the Freedom of Information Act.
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Trade secrets and other information under section 47 overlap with the Freedom of Information Act.
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The exemption for trade secrets and other information under section 47 diffuses into the Freedom of Information Act.
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: The CogAI recognizes the exemption for trade secrets and other information under section 47 in the Freedom of Information Act.
premise text: Section 47 applies to this subsection.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to trade secrets or other information to which section 47 applies.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-3
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Exemption from FOI request based on business or financial affairs of the requester's undertaking or organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Requester's business or financial affairs exempt from FOI request.
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not have effect in relation to a request by a person for access to a document:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Requester's business or financial affairs overlap with document content.
premise text: (a) by reason only of the inclusion in the document of information concerning that person in respect of his or her business or professional affairs:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Requester's business or financial affairs overlap with document content.
premise text: (b) by reason only of the inclusion in the document of information concerning the business, commercial or financial affairs of an undertaking where the person making the request is the proprietor of the undertaking or a person acting on behalf of the proprietor:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-4
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Definition of undertaking for Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-6

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of undertaking
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.
conclusion text: The definition of undertaking includes...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of undertaking
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.
conclusion text: The definition of undertaking includes...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal relation between undertakings
premise text: An undertaking is carried on by, or by an authority of, the Commonwealth or a State or by a local government authority.
conclusion text: The temporal relation includes...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-ss-5
part of: 40 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Must provide access to information concerning a person's status as a member of a profession, except in cases where it would be contrary to the public interest.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47H Public interest conditional exemptions—research
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47h
note: Conditional exemptions for research documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47h-norm

47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j
has part: 47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45

47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
note: Conditional exemptions for documents that could have a substantial adverse effect on the economy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain documents.
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies documents as conditionally exempt based on economic impact.
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for conditional exemptions.
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for conditional exemptions.
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about conditional exemptions.
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Infer
logic summary: Inferential reasoning for conditional exemptions.
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j-ss-2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
note: Substantial adverse effect on the economy of a particular region of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-2-norm

47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
note: Must provide access to conditionally exempt documents unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document
conclusion text: unless it would be contrary to the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal intervals for exemptions
premise text: documents containing matter relating to any of the following:
conclusion text: (a) currency or exchange rates; (b) interest rates;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-47j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
logic summary: Recurring trace for exemptions
premise text: documents containing matter relating to any of the following:
conclusion text: (e) foreign investment in Australia;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-42-norm

34 Schedule 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-3
note: Substitute Section 47H for Section 43A in Schedule 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-34-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBST
logic summary: Substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Paragraph 33(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
note: Maintain confidentiality of certain information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Paragraph 33(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to maintain confidentiality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Paragraph 50A(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36-2
note: Repeal of public access to confidential information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Paragraph 50A(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-36-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on public access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-44
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-44-norm

37 Paragraph 50A(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
note: Maintain confidentiality of information under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-shacl-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making confidential information publicly available.
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.
conclusion text: Do not make the information publicly available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between the communication date and the public access date.
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.
conclusion text: The public access date must overlap with the communication date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Containment
logic summary: Requires containment of information within the Commonwealth entity.
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.
conclusion text: The information must be contained within the Commonwealth entity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Requires inference of confidentiality based on the communication and advice from the foreign entity.
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.
conclusion text: The information is inferred to be confidential.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-37-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates the classification of information as confidential based on its origin and advice from the foreign entity.
premise text: Information was communicated in confidence by a foreign government or entity.
conclusion text: The information is validated to be classified as confidential.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Subsection 34(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-38-2
note: Omit “or 33A,”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of “or 33A,”.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Application—Part 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
note: Amendment applies in relation to FOIA requests received at or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-39-norm

40 Application—items 35, 36 and 37
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-40-2
note: Amendments apply for determining access to records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.49
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Application—items 35, 36 and 37
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Amendments apply for determining access to records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-40-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-46
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-3-sec-46-norm

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Defines access grant decision term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Defines access refusal decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: access refusal decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Action must have same meaning as in Ombudsman Act 1976 if taken by person or agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same meaning as in Ombudsman Act 1976
premise text: Action taken by person or agency
conclusion text: Must have same meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Defines 'affected third party'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of obligation
premise text: Section 4(1) imposes a duty on affected third parties
conclusion text: Section 53C defines the scope of this duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Definition of authorized person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
premise text: Section 77
conclusion text: Authorized person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: Defines 'complainant' for the purpose of the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
note: Definition of 'engage in conduct'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines the meaning of 'engage in conduct'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Relates to a subclass of 'conduct'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Definition of IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: IC review has the meaning given by section 54G.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Definition of IC reviewable decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: IC reviewable decision has the meaning given by section 54K.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: Definition of IC review applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: IC review applicant has the meaning given by section 54J.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
note: Definition of IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: IC review application has the meaning given by section 54H.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Defines implementation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Establishes definition
premise text: Section 89
conclusion text: Section 12(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
note: Definition of Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines the term
conclusion text: Information Commissioner has the meaning given by the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
note: Defines internal review meaning
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-14-norm

48 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-48
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-norm

15 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
note: Definition of internal review applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: internal review applicant has the meaning given by section 54B.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
note: Defines investigation recommendations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-16-norm

17 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
note: Defines investigation results term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
note: Defines respondent agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-18-norm

19 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
note: Defines 'review parties' as given by section 55A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
note: Definition of vexatious applicant declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: vexatious applicant declaration has the meaning given by section 89K.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
note: Omit “(1)” from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-21-norm

22 Subsections 12(2) to (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-22-norm

23 Subsection 21(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-23-norm

24 Subparagraph 26(1)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
note: Replace 'Ombudsman' with 'Information Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-24-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Replace 'Ombudsman' with 'Information Commissioner'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Paragraph 26(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
note: Substitute internal review and IC review phrases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-25-norm

26 Paragraph 29(9)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
note: Omit “Ombudsman”, substitute ‘Information Commissioner’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-26-norm

27 Subsection 29(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
note: Substitute 'internal review (Part VI)' and 'IC review (Part VII)' for 'review under section 54'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-27-norm

28 Section 31
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-28-norm

31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
has part: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
has part: 31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53

31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
note: Applicant must pay charge within processing period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide payment
premise text: Request received before processing period end
conclusion text: Pay charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
note: Extended processing period for charge notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-norm

50 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-50
note: Regulations regarding charge imposition and payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasCharge
logic summary: Has a charge
premise text: The applicant is subject to the regulations.
conclusion text: The decision has been considered under section 29.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

29 After section 51D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-29-norm

51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da
has part: 51DA(1) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(2) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(3) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(4) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(5) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(6) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(7) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
has part: 51DA(8) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54

51DA(1) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51DA(1) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: Deemed refusal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51DA(2) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51DA(2) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Refusal
logic summary: Principal officer's refusal to amend or annotate record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51DA(3) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: Request for further time to deal with application may be made in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51DA(4) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: Allow further time for agency or Minister to deal with application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51DA(5) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: The Information Commissioner may impose conditions on further time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Imposition of conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51DA(6) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: Agency/Minister may make decision on application within further time allowed and comply with conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 51DA(6) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Agency/Minister has permission to make decision on application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51DA(7) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: Failure to comply with conditions or make a decision within the allowed time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failure to comply with conditions or make a decision within the allowed time.
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval that overlaps with the initial decision period.
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the initial decision period and the allowed time.
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the agency or Minister to comply with conditions or make a decision within the allowed time.
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Describes an implication between the initial decision period and the allowed time.
premise text: (7) However, subsection (2) (deemed refusal) applies as if the initial decision period were extended by the time allowed by the Information Commissioner under subsection (4) if the agency or Minister: ...
conclusion text: ...No further time allowed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51DA(8) Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
note: No power to allow further time under subsection (7) in relation to the decision taken under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-linearlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action by Information Commissioner
premise text: (7) applies
conclusion text: No power to allow further time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51da-ss-8-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action by Information Commissioner
premise text: (7) applies
conclusion text: No power to allow further time
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Part VI (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-30-norm

52 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-52
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-norm

31 Before section 53
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-31-2-norm

52 Internal review of decisions—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-52-2
note: Agencies must complete internal reviews within 30 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Section 53
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
note: Substitute 'Act' for 'Part'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-32-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Section 53
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
note: Omit specified sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Sections 54 to 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-34-norm

53A What is an access refusal decision?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53a
note: Definition of access refusal decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53A What is an access refusal decision?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Access refusal decision is a specific type of decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53B What is an access grant decision?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53b
note: Access must be given to a document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53B What is an access grant decision?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
premise text: Access must be given to a document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54
note: Agency or Minister must give access to document if it is not exempt under section 47 or conditionally exempt under section 47G.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must give access to document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53c
note: Defines who is an affected third party for a document request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for personal information
premise text: section 27A (documents affecting personal privacy) applies in relation to personal information in the document about a living person
conclusion text: the legal personal representative of the deceased person
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Excludes certain individuals from being affected third parties
premise text: consultation with a State under section 26A (documents affecting Commonwealth-State relations) is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Excludes certain individuals from being affected third parties
premise text: section 27 (business documents) applies in relation to business information in the document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Excludes certain individuals from being affected third parties
premise text: section 27A (documents affecting personal privacy) applies in relation to personal information in the document about a deceased person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53c-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines who is an affected third party for a document request
premise text: Who is an affected third party?
conclusion text: the person or organisation concerned (within the meaning of section 27)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54 Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-2
has part: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
has part: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59

54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision
note: Agency must provide access to document if refusal decision is made by someone other than the principal officer or responsible Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide access to document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision
note: Applicant may apply for internal review of access refusal decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to apply for internal review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a
note: Agency must grant access to document upon request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.59
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54A Internal review—access grant decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56
note: Third party can apply for review of access grant decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54B Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b
has part: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(2) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(3) Internal review—application for review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60

54B(1) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review
note: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54B(2) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review
note: Agency may extend application deadline
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits agency action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54B(3) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review
note: Exercise of agency power to allow further application period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between agency actions
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her
conclusion text: The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring agency action
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her
conclusion text: The agency’s power to allow a further period for making an application may be exercised
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54C Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c
has part: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(3) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(4) Internal review—decision on internal review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60

54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review
note: Application for internal review of access refusal or grant decision must be made in accordance with this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made in accordance with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review
note: Agency must arrange for internal review of decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has a duty to arrange for internal review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54C(3) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review
note: Agency must make a fresh decision within 30 days after application receipt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54C(3) Internal review—decision on internal review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Decision within 30 days is required
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54C(4) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review
note: Decision on internal review must extend to a decision made under section 26.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54C(4) Internal review—decision on internal review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Obligation to extend decision
premise text: Section 26 extends to a decision made under this section.
conclusion text: Decision on internal review must extend to a decision made under section 26.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval includes decision on internal review
premise text: Decision on internal review occurs within this section.
conclusion text: This section is part of the temporal interval for decision on internal review.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Decision on internal review implies extension to section 26
premise text: Section 26 extends to a decision made under this section.
conclusion text: A decision on internal review implies that section 26 extends to it.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to natural persons and legal persons
premise text: This section applies to natural persons and legal persons.
conclusion text: This section is applicable to natural persons and legal persons.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to schema definitions
premise text: This section is part of the schema definition for this law.
conclusion text: This section is applicable to schema definitions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d
has part: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61

54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Internal review deemed affirmation of original decision if application is made within 30 days and notice not received.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DEEMED
logic summary: Affirmation of original decision
premise text: (application for internal review has been made) and (period of 30 days has ended)
conclusion text: (notice of decision on application has not been received)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Period of 30 days has passed since application was made
premise text: (period of 30 days) and (has ended)
conclusion text: (notice of decision on application has not been received)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Recurring trace: Application for internal review within 30 days
premise text: (application for internal review) and (period of 30 days) and (has ended)
conclusion text: (notice of decision on application has not been received)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Application for internal review within 30 days and notice not received
premise text: (application for internal review) and (period of 30 days) and (has ended) AND (notice of decision on application has not been received)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: AND
logic summary: Application for internal review within 30 days and notice not received
premise text: (application for internal review) and (period of 30 days) and (has ended) AND (notice of decision on application has not been received)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Agency must provide notice to internal review applicant on same day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Agency may apply for further time to deal with application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to request extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Allow further time for agency to deal with application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58
has part: 58(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 58(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 58(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 58(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62

58(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-5
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Condition for allowing further time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may impose
logic summary: Obligation to impose conditions
premise text: Information Commissioner may allow further time
conclusion text: Information Commissioner must impose conditions if allowed further time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-6
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency's decision on application is not affected if it complies with conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Agency's decision is permitted.
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Agency's decision overlaps with the further time allowed.
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Agency's decision is until the further time allowed.
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Agency's actions diffuse to the further time allowed.
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Agency recognizes its own actions.
premise text: (6) Subsection (2) (deemed affirmation) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied, if the agency:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-7
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency must comply with conditions imposed under subsection (5) within the further time allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-8
part of: 58 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Prevents Information Commissioner from allowing further time under section 58(2) in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents action
premise text: Section 58(2) allows further time
conclusion text: Section 58(8) prohibits further time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between sections 58(2) and 58(8)
premise text: Section 58(2) has a start time
conclusion text: Section 58(8) has an end time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections 58(2) and 58(8)
premise text: Section 58(2) is before section 58(8)
conclusion text: Section 58(8) is after section 58(2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restricts
logic summary: Limits Information Commissioner's ability to act
premise text: Section 58(7) applies
conclusion text: Section 58(8) restricts Information Commissioner's action
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Restricts
logic summary: Limits Information Commissioner's decision-making
premise text: Section 58(7) applies
conclusion text: Section 58(8) restricts Information Commissioner's decision
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54e
note: Exemptions from internal review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from internal review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54f
note: The Information Commissioner must make a decision on the review in accordance with Division 7.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.63
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must make a decision on the review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60
note: Application for review of a decision may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54G Key concepts—what is an IC review?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54g
note: Defines IC review and its meaning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54g-norm

54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54h
note: Definition of IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54h-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54j
note: Defines who is an IC review applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54j-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54k
note: Defines what is an IC reviewable decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54k-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l
has part: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65

54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
note: Application for review of access refusal decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Application must be made
conclusion text: An application may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
note: Access refusal decisions are subject to internal review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide access refusal decisions subject to internal review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
note: Application for IC review may be made by or on behalf of the person who made the request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m
has part: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
has part: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
has part: 54M(3) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65

54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
note: Application for review of access grant decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
note: Decision to affirm original access grant decision if no internal review decision within 30 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Affirmation obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54M(3) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-3
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
note: Who can make an IC review application?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-3-norm

62 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-62
note: Identify person who made request for decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Identification
logic summary: Identify the person who made the request
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.
conclusion text: The person who made the request must be identified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establish a temporal relation between the request and the decision
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.
conclusion text: There is a temporal relation between the request and the decision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establish a recurring trace of requests and decisions
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of requests and decisions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse information about the request and decision
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.
conclusion text: Information about the request and decision is diffused
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Create a knowledge graph of requests and decisions
premise text: (b) in a case covered by paragraph (2)(b)—the person who made the request to which the decision relates.
conclusion text: A knowledge graph of requests and decisions is created
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n
has part: 54N(1) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(2) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(3) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(4) IC review applications—application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66

54N(1) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Application must provide details on notice sending and copy of relevant notice.
description: Details on notice sending, copy of relevant notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must provide details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N(2) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Must provide particulars of basis for dispute
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N(3) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Office must provide assistance to prepare IC review application.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54N(3) IC review applications—application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N(4) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Must send IC review application to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54N(4) IC review applications—application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to send application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p
has part: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67

54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
note: Notify affected third parties of non-access to documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
note: Notify affected third party for document of application
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
note: Notify Information Commissioner of notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q
has part: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67

54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
note: Not giving IC review applications under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to give IC review applications
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section overlaps with other sections that apply to IC review applications
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
note: Notifying affected third party is not required under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Notifying affected third party is not required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-64
note: Notifying an affected third party would prejudice certain activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents notification of an affected third party.
premise text: (3) The circumstances covered by this subsection are...
conclusion text: ...do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Notification timing overlaps with investigation or administration.
premise text: (3) The circumstances covered by this subsection are...
conclusion text: ...do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54R IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r
has part: 54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
has part: 54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68

54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal
note: Withdrawal of IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal
note: IC review application withdrawal obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Withdrawal of IC review application is taken never to have been made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54S IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s
has part: 54S(1) IC review applications—time limits
has part: 54S(2) IC review applications—time limits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68

54S(1) IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1
part of: 54S IC review applications—time limits
note: IC review application must be made within 60 days after notice of decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54S(1) IC review applications—time limits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be made within 60 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54S(2) IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2
part of: 54S IC review applications—time limits
note: IC review application must be made within 30 days after notice of decision under section 26A, 27 or 27A was given to the affected third party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54S(2) IC review applications—time limits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make IC review application within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t
has part: 54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69

54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Extension of time for making IC review application may be applied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1-norm

54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Extension of time for IC review applications is allowed if reasonable in all circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Allowance of extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Reasonableness in circumstances
premise text: Information Commissioner believes
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Conditional extension
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Extension of time for making IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Allowance of extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Notify a specified person or persons of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory notification
premise text: Application under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Give notice of the application to a specified person or persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Must notify the Information Commissioner within a time limit
description: Reasonable opportunity to be heard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a reasonable opportunity to be heard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Extension of time for IC review applications if notice is given under subsection (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.69
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-norm

66 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-66
note: Must provide a reasonable opportunity to present cases before determining an application.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty to provide a reasonable opportunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54U Decision to review—interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54u
note: Applies to a part of an IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54u-norm

54V Decision to review—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54v
note: May make inquiries to determine whether to undertake IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54v-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54W Decision to review—discretion not to review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54w
note: Decision not to review IC review application under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54w-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to decide not to review IC review application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x
has part: 54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71

54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to undertake an IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1-norm

54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Notify review parties of decision in writing.
description: Decision notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Notice must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision and application details.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Exempt matter and certain document information cannot be included in the notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not include
logic summary: Prohibition on including exempt matter and certain document information.
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: The notice must be given between specified times.
premise text: No specific start and end times are mentioned.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: An ordered trace is required for the notice.
premise text: No specific start and end times are mentioned.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y
note: Agency or Minister must review actual decisions made after IC review has commenced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54y-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must review actual decisions made after IC review has commenced.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-68
note: A person must make an IC review application for review of the deemed decision if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
premise text: a person makes an IC review application for review of the deemed decision
conclusion text: the Information Commissioner must deal with the IC review application for review of the deemed decision as if it were an IC review application for the review of the actual decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal overlap
premise text: the Information Commissioner must deal with the IC review application for review of the deemed decision as if it were an IC review application for the review of the actual decision
conclusion text: The IC review application is made during the period when the agency or Minister has not made a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: every time
logic summary: Recurring action
premise text: the Information Commissioner must deal with the IC review application for review of the deemed decision as if it were an IC review application for the review of the actual decision
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must deal with every IC review application for review of the actual decision in a similar manner
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
premise text: the agency or Minister must make a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review)
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must make a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review) in relation to the deemed decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54Z Procedure in IC review—general notice requirement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54z
note: Informing person, agency or Minister who made the decision before IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54z-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Informing is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55
has part: 55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(3) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(4) Procedure in IC review—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72

55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general
note: The Information Commissioner may review an IC reviewable decision without holding a hearing under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may review an IC reviewable decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfied
logic summary: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that there are no unusual circumstances that would warrant a hearing.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: if
logic summary: The review can be adequately determined in the absence of the review parties.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must not apply
logic summary: None of the review parties have applied for a hearing under section 55B.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general
note: The Information Commissioner may conduct an IC review in a way they consider appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may do something.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has part
logic summary: The IC review has parts.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The IC review may be conducted during a certain time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general
note: A direction given under paragraph (2)(e) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of direction being a legislative instrument
premise text: (3) A direction given under paragraph (2)(e)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(4) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-4
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general
note: Information Commissioner must conduct IC review with minimal formality and technicality.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(4) Procedure in IC review—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to conduct IC review with minimal formality and technicality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70
note: Must hold hearing in public unless certain conditions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must hold hearing in public
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a
has part: 55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74

55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
note: Defines parties to an IC review proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1-norm

55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
note: A person whose interests are affected by the IC reviewable decision may apply to be a review party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
note: Makes a person an IC review party by notice in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make a person an IC review party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b
has part: 55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
has part: 55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
has part: 55B(3) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75

55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
note: Request for hearing during IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Request for hearing is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
note: Notify other review parties of application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B(3) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
note: Must give review parties a reasonable opportunity to make submissions and decide whether or not to hold a hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give review parties a reasonable opportunity to make submissions and decide whether or not to hold a hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55C Procedure in IC review—representation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55c
note: Review party may appear in person or be represented by another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55D Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d
has part: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
has part: 55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75

55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus
note: Agency or Minister has the onus of establishing that a decision is justified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Establishing justification
premise text: (a) a decision given in respect of the request or application is justified;
conclusion text: (b) the Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the IC review applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Establishing justification
premise text: (a) a decision given in respect of the request or application is justified;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus
note: Affected third party has the onus of establishing that a decision refusing the request is justified or the Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the person who made the request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.75
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Has onus
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: mustEstablish
logic summary: Must establish
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation
logic summary: Has temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

72 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-72
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-norm

55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55da
note: Agency or Minister must assist Information Commissioner in IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e
has part: 55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76

55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
note: Agency/Minister must provide statement of reasons for IC reviewable decision.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency/Minister must provide statement of reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
note: Agency or Minister must provide adequate statement of reasons upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Requires agency or Minister to provide adequate statement of reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
note: Provide adequate statement of reasons within specified period or 28 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide statement of reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f
has part: 55F(1) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
has part: 55F(2) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76

55F(1) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f-ss-1
part of: 55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
note: Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-1-norm

55F(2) Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2
part of: 55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
note: The Information Commissioner may make a decision in accordance with an agreement without completing the IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may make a decision in accordance with an agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g
has part: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
has part: 55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.77

55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
note: Agency or Minister may vary access refusal decision during IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to vary access refusal decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
note: Conditional commencement of access refusal decision variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-norm

74 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74
note: Agency/Minister must notify Information Commissioner of variation or substitution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency/Minister must notify Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h
has part: 55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78

55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: The Information Commissioner may refer a question of law to the Federal Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: The Information Commissioner may refer questions of law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
conclusion text: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia may be exercised by a single judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Exercise jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: Must not give a decision before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on giving decisions before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
premise text: Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference.
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on proceeding in a manner inconsistent with Federal Court of Australia's opinion.
premise text: The Information Commissioner must not proceed in a manner, or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question.
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not proceed in a manner, or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal interval during which Information Commissioner must not give decisions.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not, for the purposes of the IC review:
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference during the period when the question is referred.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal interval during which Information Commissioner must not give decisions.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not, for the purposes of the IC review:
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference during the period when the question is referred.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on giving decisions before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not, for the purposes of the IC review:
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must not give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55J Procedure in IC review—sending of documents to, and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55j
note: Must disclose documents to Federal Court of Australia upon request.
description: Documents and information in possession of the Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55j-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k
has part: 55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79

55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-norm

55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: The Information Commissioner may perform functions and exercise powers of the person who made the IC reviewable decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Decision of the Information Commissioner has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: same effect
logic summary: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect...
conclusion text: as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Decision applies during the period of the IC review
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has...
conclusion text: during the period of the IC reviewable decision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Decision implies that the agency or Minister's decision is effective
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has...
conclusion text: the agency or Minister's decision is effective.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Decision diffuses to all relevant parties
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has...
conclusion text: to all relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
description: Statement of reasons, Statement of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Exempt matter cannot be included in a decision on IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not include
logic summary: Prohibition of information inclusion
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
conclusion text: Exempt matter cannot be included in a decision on IC review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76
has part: 76(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 76(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 76(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80

76(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-6
part of: 76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: The Information Commissioner must give a copy of a decision on an IC review to each review party.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-7
part of: 76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Publication requirement for a document purporting to be certified by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to publish the document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-8
part of: 76 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: The Information Commissioner must publish a decision on an IC review to members of the public generally.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a decision on an IC review to members of the public generally.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l
has part: 55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
has part: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80

55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
note: No power to give access to exempt documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
note: No power to give access to exempt matter
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt matter
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m
has part: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
has part: 55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80

55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
note: The Information Commissioner must decide to amend records under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must decide
premise text: The decision is required
conclusion text: An amendment must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The author of the opinion must be qualified to form the opinion
premise text: The author lacks qualifications
conclusion text: An amendment is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
note: Cannot amend records under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of amendment
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...
conclusion text: ...amend the record if he or she is satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for amendment limitation
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...
conclusion text: ...satisfied of either of the following: (a) the record is a record of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional amendment limitation
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...
conclusion text: ...amend the record if he or she is satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55N Decision on IC review—obligation to comply with decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55n
note: Must comply with Information Commissioner's decision on IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: Decision of the Information Commissioner
conclusion text: Compliance with decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p
has part: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81

55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Agency must comply with section 55N
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Application for enforcement of IC review decision against agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Agency must enforce IC review decision
premise text: State bears duty to enforce IC review decision
conclusion text: The agency must enforce the IC review decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Application must be made during IC review process
premise text: The application must be made during the IC review process
conclusion text: The application must be made during the IC review process.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: State must enforce IC review decision
premise text: The state bears duty to enforce the IC review decision
conclusion text: The state must enforce the IC review decision.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Court may make orders to secure compliance by principal officer or Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Application under subsection (1) may not be made before the end of the time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot make application
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...before the end of the time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q
note: Correction of errors in IC review decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55q-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55q-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to correct errors
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78
note: Correcting obvious errors in decisions or statements of reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to correct errors
premise text: The Information Commissioner may correct an obvious error
conclusion text: Correcting obvious errors is obligatory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r
has part: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82

55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: The Information Commissioner may compel a person to produce information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Compelling production of information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: Notice to produce documents
description: Documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to produce
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and production
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to provide information or produce a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: The Information Commissioner requires the person to provide information or produce a document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: Notice must be in writing and specify compliance details.
description: Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s
has part: 55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83

55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
note: The Information Commissioner must permit access by those entitled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must permit access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
note: Permit inspection of documents held by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
note: Permit inspection of documents at reasonable time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-80
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-norm

55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t
has part: 55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84

55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: Principal officer of an agency or Minister claims a document is exempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
logic summary: Claiming a document is exempt.
premise text: Section 55U does not apply to the document.
conclusion text: The document is claimed to be exempt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: production under obligation
logic summary: Document production is under obligation.
premise text: (1) This section applies to an IC review of a decision in relation to a...
conclusion text: The document production is under obligation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: exempt document produced
logic summary: Document is exempt and produced.
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a Minister claims that...
conclusion text: The document is exempt and produced.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: production under obligation
logic summary: Document production spreads obligation.
premise text: (1) This section applies to an IC review of a decision in relation to a...
conclusion text: The document production spreads obligation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: exempt document classification
logic summary: Document classification is exempt.
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a Minister claims that...
conclusion text: The document classification is exempt.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: The Information Commissioner may require a document to be produced for deciding whether it is an exempt document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has the power to require a document to be produced.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: Must return exempt document to person who produced it
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return exempt document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: The Information Commissioner may require the production of an exempt document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to produce information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: Access to document is restricted to authorized persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts access to the document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55U Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u
has part: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national security
has part: 55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national security
has part: 55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national security
has part: 55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85

55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security
note: IC review of a decision in relation to an exempt document under section 33 or 34.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national security
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to review IC documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security
note: The Information Commissioner may only require the production of a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-norm

55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security
note: Require document production for inspection by Information Commissioner if exempt claim is disputed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfy
logic summary: Requires evidence to be satisfied before requiring document production.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Involves an ordered trace of required actions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national security
note: Restrict access to exempt documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access
premise text: Information Commissioner's satisfaction
conclusion text: Return document to producer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v
has part: 55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
has part: 55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85

55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
note: Refusal of access to a document under section 24A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to a document under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies documents as accessible or not under section 24A using AI
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
note: Agency or Minister must conduct further searches for a document upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct further searches
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-norm

55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w
has part: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86

55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
note: Notice must be in writing, specify time and place for compliance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
note: Requires persons to appear in response to a notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person to appear.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x
has part: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86

55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
note: The Information Commissioner may administer an oath or affirmation to a person and examine the person on oath or affirmation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must administer an oath or affirmation to a person and examine the person on oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
note: The person must tell the truth when answering questions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation to provide truthful answers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: The person believes they will tell the truth.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...breaches that requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between examination and breach of requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of examination and breach of requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...breaches that requirement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Cognitive AI application of obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...breaches that requirement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55y
note: No loss of legal professional privilege when information is given, produced or referred to for the purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55y-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal professional privilege obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z
has part: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87

55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
note: Protection from liability for good faith information gathering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide information in good faith
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
premise text: This section applies
conclusion text: Civil proceedings do not lie against a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to protect from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of applicability
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Recurring trace of applicability
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses protection from liability
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Protects
logic summary: Protects from liability for information gathering powers
premise text: (3) This section applies whether or not the person is required to do a thing mentioned in subsection (1)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-84
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-norm

55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55za
note: Scope of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55za-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55za-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb
has part: 55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88

55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence from Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide personal appearance and evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence on potential damage to Commonwealth security, defence, or international relations if proposed deletions are not made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request personal appearance and evidence
premise text: Information Commissioner must request Inspector-General to appear personally
conclusion text: Inspector-General must give evidence on potential damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information on potential damage
premise text: Inspector-General must give evidence on potential damage
conclusion text: Information Commissioner must be informed of potential damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: CAN
logic summary: Permission to divulge information on potential damage
premise text: Information Commissioner may divulge information if Inspector-General appears personally
conclusion text: Inspector-General must appear personally before divulging information
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CAN
logic summary: Permission to request personal appearance and evidence on potential damage
premise text: Information Commissioner may request Inspector-General to appear personally
conclusion text: Inspector-General must appear personally before requesting evidence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for requesting personal appearance and evidence
premise text: Inspector-General must appear personally before determining access to document with deletions
conclusion text: Information Commissioner must request Inspector-General to appear personally within a certain time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Agency and Minister must provide evidence before hearing Inspector-General's evidence.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZB(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: The Information Commissioner is not bound by the Inspector-General's opinion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZB(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The Information Commissioner is not bound by the Inspector-General's opinion.
premise text: Inspector-General expresses an opinion.
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is not bound.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: The provision exempts the Information Commissioner from the Inspector-General's opinion.
premise text: Inspector-General expresses an opinion.
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is exempted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
logic summary: The provision does not imply that the Information Commissioner must follow the Inspector-General's opinion.
premise text: Inspector-General expresses an opinion.
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is not required to follow.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IsExemptedFrom
logic summary: The provision defines a condition for the Information Commissioner's exemption from the Inspector-General's opinion.
premise text: Obligation defined by Inspector-General's opinion.
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is exempted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IsBoundBy
logic summary: The provision defines a condition for the Information Commissioner's binding obligation.
premise text: Obligation defined by Inspector-General's opinion.
conclusion text: Information Commissioner is bound.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZC Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zc
note: Must comply with a request unless not qualified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-epistemic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: NOT QUALIFIED
logic summary: Insufficient qualification
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd
has part: 55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89

55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Applicability to Inspector-General's compliance with a request under section 55ZB.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applicability
premise text: Section applies for the purposes of enabling the Inspector-General to comply with a request under section 55ZB.
conclusion text: This section applies for the purposes of enabling the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to comply with a request under section 55ZB.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Allow Inspector-General to take possession of documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86
has part: 86(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 86(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90

86(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-3
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Production of documents for access to exempt documents
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory production of documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-4
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: May make copies of documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make copies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-5
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Return original documents and destroy copies after giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to return original documents and destroy copies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-6
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Permits inspection of documents held by the Inspector-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-7
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Permit person to inspect document at reasonable times.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-8
part of: 86 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Inspector-General must be given a reasonable time to consider documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (8) The Information Commissioner must allow the Inspector-General...
conclusion text: ...a period within which to consider...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2
has part: 56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90

56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Right to appeal on questions of law from Information Commissioner's decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right to appeal
premise text: Review party may appeal
conclusion text: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Appeal must be instituted within a specified time frame after IC review decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be instituted within a specified time frame.
premise text: (2) An appeal under this section must be instituted:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Appeal must be instituted within a specified time frame after IC review decision.
premise text: (2) An appeal under this section must be instituted:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Existence of jurisdiction
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the provision and its application
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction during the period in which appeals are instituted under this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the provision and its application
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction during the period in which appeals are instituted under this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: Existence of artificial intelligence application
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has a system for determining appeals instituted under this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: has
logic summary: Existence of schema application
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia conforms to a schema for determining appeals instituted under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Jurisdiction to make findings of fact under section 56A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Jurisdiction includes
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subsubsection
logic summary: Subsubsection (3) included in subsection (4)
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Must hear and determine the appeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hear and determine the appeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: The Federal Court of Australia may not make certain decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A Appeals—Federal Court of Australia may make findings of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56a
note: Court may make findings of fact in appeals under section 56
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-88
has part: 88(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 88(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92

88(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: May have regard to evidence given in IC review and receive further evidence for making findings of fact.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: May have regard to evidence given in IC review
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)
conclusion text: (a) have regard to the evidence given in the IC review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY RECEIVE FURTHER EVIDENCE
logic summary: May receive further evidence
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)
conclusion text: (b) receive further evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: IC review is a temporal interval between which further evidence may be received
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)
conclusion text: the period during which further evidence may be received
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: IC review is a temporal interval between which further evidence may be received
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)
conclusion text: the period during which further evidence may be received
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IS A CLASS OF
logic summary: Further evidence is a class of evidence that may be considered
premise text: (2) For the purposes of making findings of fact under subsection (1)
conclusion text: the further evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: No limitation on power to remit case to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Federal Court of Australia has an obligation to remit case to Information Commissioner
premise text: (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)
conclusion text: Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6) to make an order remitting the case to be heard and decided again by the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Remittal order overlaps with other remittal orders
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)
conclusion text: The remittal order made by the Federal Court of Australia overlaps with other remittal orders.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Remittal order repeats previous remittal order
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)
conclusion text: The remittal order made by the Federal Court of Australia repeats a previous remittal order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Remittal order diffuses to other cases
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)
conclusion text: The remittal order made by the Federal Court of Australia diffuses to other cases.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Federal Court of Australia recognizes Information Commissioner's power
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Federal Court of Australia’s power under subsection 56(6)
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia recognizes the Information Commissioner's power to remit cases.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Review by the Tribunal—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57
note: Application for review by the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Review by the Tribunal—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Application may be made
conclusion text: An application may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for the review of certain decisions (see section 57A).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Division 6 deals with the circumstances in which the Tribunal may make recommendations as to costs
conclusion text: Division 6 deals with the circumstances in which the Tribunal may make recommendations as to costs.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.
conclusion text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a
has part: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
has part: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.93

57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
note: Application for review of certain decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May apply for review
premise text: A person whose interests are affected by the decision
conclusion text: may make an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Time limit for application
premise text: Subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 sets out the time within which the application for review must be made
conclusion text: the time limit is BETWEEN 0 and 30 days
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must apply within time limit
premise text: Subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 sets out the time within which the application for review must be made
conclusion text: must apply within the specified time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be affected by decision
premise text: A person whose interests are affected by the decision (see section 27 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975)
conclusion text: must be affected by the decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May apply for review
premise text: An application may be made to the Tribunal for review of the following decisions:
conclusion text: may make an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
note: Prescribed time for lodging an application for review of IC reviewable decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide prescribed time
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
conclusion text: the period: ... is the prescribed time for a person to lodge an application for review of an IC reviewable decision mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Prescribed time is a temporal interval
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act
conclusion text: the prescribed time is a temporal interval between which a person must lodge an application for review of an IC reviewable decision mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Prescribed time contains a temporal trace
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act
conclusion text: the prescribed time contains a temporal trace of when a person must lodge an application for review of an IC reviewable decision mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Prescribed time spreads to other decisions
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act
conclusion text: the prescribed time spreads to other IC reviewable decisions mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES
logic summary: Prescribed time applies to AI decision-making
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 29(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, for the purposes of paragraph 29(1)(d) of that Act
conclusion text: the prescribed time applies to AI decision-making in IC reviewable decisions mentioned in paragraph (1)(b) of this section
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

90 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90
note: Conditional commencement of freedom of information amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsection 58(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-35-norm

36 After section 58
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-36
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-36-norm

58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a
has part: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
has part: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94

58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
note: Access to document is refused under section 24A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to document.
premise text: (document cannot be found etc.)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
note: Tribunal may require further searches for document review purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa
has part: 58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
has part: 58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94

58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
note: Amendment to records requires satisfaction of conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires conditions to be met
premise text: Tribunal has power to amend records
conclusion text: Amendment requires satisfaction of conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Conditions must be met between two points in time
premise text: Tribunal's decision is made at a certain point in time
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met before or after the decision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Conditions must be met between two points in time
premise text: Tribunal's decision is made at a certain point in time
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met before or after the decision
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if and only if
logic summary: Conditions are necessary and sufficient for amendment
premise text: Tribunal's decision has a certain impact on records
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if and only if
logic summary: Conditions are necessary and sufficient for amendment
premise text: Tribunal's decision has a certain impact on records
conclusion text: Amendment requires conditions to be met
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
note: Limitation on amending records in decisions under section 57A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Tribunal cannot amend records in certain circumstances
premise text: (2) The Tribunal must not...
conclusion text: ...amend the record if it is satisfied of either of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval overlap
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves the determination of a question that the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency (on internal review), the Information Commissioner, a court or tribunal.
conclusion text: ...the decision whether to amend the record...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Tribunal's duty to consider amendment limitations
premise text: (2) The Tribunal must not...
conclusion text: ...amend the record if it is satisfied of either of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Before section 58B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-37-norm

38 Subsection 58B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-38
note: Substitute 'review in relation to a decision' for 'the review of a decision'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-38-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces 'the review of a decision' with 'review in relation to a decision'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Section 58D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-39
note: Insertion of additional conditions in a case where 3 Deputy Presidents are present.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Section 58D
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of additional conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Sections 58F, 59 and 59A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-40
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-40-norm

41 Section 60
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-41
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-41-norm

60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-2
has part: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
has part: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95

60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
note: Applicability of section to proceedings under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to specified proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
note: Agency decisions are binding on the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Binding effect
premise text: Agency decision
conclusion text: Agency obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92
note: List of parties in a proceeding before the Tribunal for a review of a decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of parties in a proceeding before the Tribunal for a review of a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa
has part: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96

60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
note: Requirement to notify affected third party
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
note: Agency must notify affected third party upon request for access to document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must notify affected third party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab
has part: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96

60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
note: Not giving a document in relation to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
note: No notification required under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
note: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of notification
premise text: Notification would prejudice an investigation or enforcement
conclusion text: Notification is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-42
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-42-norm

61 Onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61
note: Agency/Minister must establish decision is justified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Establishment of onus
premise text: Agency/Minister applied for review
conclusion text: Decision is justified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Establishment of onus
premise text: Applicant applied for review
conclusion text: Tribunal should give adverse decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-94
note: Requester has onus to establish justification for decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-epistemic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Requester has onus to establish justification.
premise text: Decision is justified if requester establishes it.
conclusion text: Requester must establish justification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-94-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: justification
logic summary: Justification required for decision.
premise text: Decision is only justified if requester establishes it.
conclusion text: Requester's request is justified if they establish it.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a
has part: 61A(1) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
has part: 61A(1B) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
has part: 61A(2) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
has part: 61A(3) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98

61A(1) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
note: The Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 applies to proceedings under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A(1) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to apply the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(1B) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
note: Establishes deadlines for lodging documents in IC reviewable decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishes obligation to meet deadlines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A(2) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-2
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
note: Agency or Minister must comply with obligation under paragraph 37(1)(a) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A(2) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

61A(3) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
note: Tribunal's powers not limited by subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A(3) Modification of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Tribunal's powers not limited by subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Before section 63
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-43
note: Insert Schedule 4 Information Commissioner amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.99
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-43-norm

96 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-96-norm

44 Before section 66
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-44
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-44-norm

45 Paragraph 66(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45
note: A person must apply under section 57A to the Tribunal for review of a decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Paragraph 66(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subsections 66(1) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-46
note: Omit Attorney-General, substitute responsible Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-46-norm

47 Before section 67
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-47-norm

48 Paragraph 67(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-48-2
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-48-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Before Part VIII
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-49
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-49-norm

68 Investigations and complaints—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-68-2
note: The Information Commissioner may investigate an action taken by an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Investigations and complaints—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-68-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-98
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-98-norm

69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-69
has part: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
has part: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102

69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
note: The Information Commissioner must investigate a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-2
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
note: Power to investigate agency actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Agency has power to be investigated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2
has part: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102

70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
note: Complainant may complain to the Information Commissioner about an action taken by an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: about
logic summary: Indicates the subject of knowledge or inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: complain
logic summary: Expresses a temporal relation between actions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
note: Complaint must be in writing and identify the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IDENTIFY
logic summary: Identify the agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
note: Office must provide assistance to a person making a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Information Commissioner investigations—interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-71
note: Interpretation of Subdivision application to part of a complaint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-71-norm

72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-72-2
note: The Information Commissioner may make inquiries of the respondent agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-72-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Information Commissioner investigations—discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-73
note: Discretion not to investigate a complaint about an action made under section 70.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73 Information Commissioner investigations—discretion not to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-100
note: Investigation of part of complaint not allowed if complaint is frivolous or vexatious.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 100 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of investigation of part of complaint
premise text: Investigation of part of complaint not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2
has part: 74(1) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(2) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(3) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(4) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
has part: 74(5) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104

74(1) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-1
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
note: Transfer of complaints to Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-1-norm

74(2) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
note: May decide not to investigate an action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
note: Transfer complaint to Ombudsman and provide information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Transfer complaint to Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(4) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
note: Notice must state reasons for decision
description: Reasons for Information Commissioner's decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to state reasons
conclusion text: Notice must state reasons for decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(5) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
note: Transfer of complaints to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(5) Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75
has part: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105

75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: Information Commissioner must notify respondent agency in writing before beginning an investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: The Information Commissioner must provide notice if they decide not to investigate a complaint.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide notice.
conclusion text: Notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-3
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: Notify complainant and respondent agency of decision in writing.
description: Decision notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST notify...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-4
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: Notice under subsection (3) must state reasons for decision.
description: Reasons for Information Commissioner's decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-102
note: Investigation procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-102-norm

76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-2
has part: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
has part: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106

76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
note: Investigations must be conducted in private and as the Information Commissioner thinks fit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct investigations in private and as the Information Commissioner thinks fit.
premise text: (1) An investigation must be conducted...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
note: The Information Commissioner may obtain information from any officer of an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-76-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77
has part: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106

77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized person may enter and remain at a place with consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized person may enter a place occupied by an agency or contracted service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorized person can enter a place.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-3
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized person must obtain consent before entering a place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide consent
premise text: Authorized person must obtain consent before entering a place.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between consent and entry
premise text: (3) The authorised person may enter a place only if: (a) consent to the entry has been given by the person (the consenting person) who is: (i) in the case of an agency—the principal officer of the agency; or (ii) in the case of a contracted service provider—the person in charge (however described) of the contracted service provider;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between consent and entry
premise text: (3) The authorised person may enter a place only if: (a) consent to the entry has been given by the person (the consenting person) who is: (i) in the case of an agency—the principal officer of the agency; or (ii) in the case of a contracted service provider—the person in charge (however described) of the contracted service provider;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform consenting person of right to refuse consent
premise text: before giving the consent, the authorised person informed the consenting person that he or she may refuse consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-4
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorised person must leave premises upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Duty to leave premises
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.
conclusion text: The authorised person must leave the premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between investigations and requests
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.
conclusion text: The investigation overlaps with the request
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Recurring trace of requests and investigations
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.
conclusion text: The request is recurrently traced with the investigation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of information commissioner's power
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.
conclusion text: The diffusion of the information commissioner's power is affected by the request
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Influences
logic summary: Artificial agent influence on investigations
premise text: (4) The authorised person must leave the premises if the consenting person asks the authorised person to do so.
conclusion text: The artificial agent influences the investigation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-5
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Defines who is an authorized person under section 78.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the subject of an obligation.
conclusion text: Authorized person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-6
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized persons are defined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of authorized person
premise text: An authorized person is...
conclusion text: ...an APS employee...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-2
has part: 78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
has part: 78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.107

78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-1
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
note: Places for which investigations are prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-1-norm

78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
note: Authorized person must not enter or carry on investigation without approval from Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of unauthorized entry or investigation
premise text: Authorized person must not enter or carry on investigation without approval from Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-104
has part: 104(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 104(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108

104(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-3
part of: 104 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Investigation at a declared place may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits investigation at a declared place.
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited.
conclusion text: Investigation at the place is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Investigation at the place overlaps with a period of time when it may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited for a specific period of time.
conclusion text: The investigation overlaps with the declared period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Investigation at the place overlaps with a recurring trace of periods when it may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited for recurring periods of time.
conclusion text: The investigation overlaps with the recurring traces.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Investigation at the place diffuses to other places where it may prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
premise text: Attorney-General declares a place to be prohibited for diffusion to other places.
conclusion text: The investigation diffuses to other declared places.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Attorney-General classifies the investigation as prohibited based on its potential impact on Commonwealth security or defence.
premise text: Attorney-General has reason to believe investigation at the place might prejudice Commonwealth security or defence.
conclusion text: The investigation is classified as prohibited.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-104-ss-4
part of: 104 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Prohibition on entering or investigating a prohibited place without approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Declaration is in force
conclusion text: Entry or investigation is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79
has part: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108

79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: Obligation to produce information during investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty
conclusion text: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: Notice to produce information Commissioner investigations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-3
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to give information or produce a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may require
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-4
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: Notice must be in writing, specify place and time for compliance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-5
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During a period specified in a notice, the person must comply.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (3).
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During a period specified in a notice, the person must comply.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (3).
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they fail to comply during this period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: If the person engages in conduct, then they breach the requirement.
premise text: The person engages in conduct.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if their conduct breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: If the person's conduct breaches the requirement, then they commit an offence.
premise text: The person's conduct breaches the requirement.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if their conduct breaches the requirement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-80-2
has part: 80(1) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
has part: 80(2) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.109

80(1) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1
part of: 80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
note: Information Commissioner may take possession, make copies, extracts, or hold documents for investigation purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(1) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2
part of: 80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
note: Must permit inspection of documents during investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-106
note: The Information Commissioner must permit inspection of a document at any reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 106 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Obligation to permit inspection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-81
note: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-81-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2
has part: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110

82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
note: Notice requirements for compliance with investigation
description: Notice in writing, specifying time and place of compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Timeframe for compliance
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
logic summary: Recurring trace of compliance
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Spread of compliance requirements
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: REASONING
logic summary: Reasoning about compliance requirements
premise text: (2) The notice must: (a) be in writing; and (b) state that the person must comply with the notice at a specified time that is not less than 14 days after the time at which the person is given the notice;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
note: A person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches a requirement specified in a notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requirements.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Temporal interval for requirements and conduct.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on engaging in conduct that breaches requirements.
premise text: The person engages in conduct.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to comply with requirements.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-82-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: right
logic summary: Right to comply with requirements.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83
has part: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111

83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-1
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
note: Information Commissioner may administer oath or affirmation to a person required to appear.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
description: True answers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory truth-telling
premise text: The person taking the oath or affirmation
conclusion text: Must provide true answers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-3
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
premise text: The person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.
conclusion text: Failure to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-84-2
note: No loss of legal professional privilege when information is given, produced or referred to for the purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-84-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal professional privilege is not lost when information is shared.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-85
note: Protection from liability for good faith provision of information during investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect individuals from liability for good faith provision of information during investigation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-108
has part: 108(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 108(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112

108(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-108-ss-2
part of: 108 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Immunity from civil proceedings and penalties for certain actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the section applies, then no civil proceedings lie.
premise text: (2) If this section applies...
conclusion text: civil proceedings do not lie against a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the section applies, then no penalty under law is liable.
premise text: (2) If this section applies...
conclusion text: the person is not liable for a penalty under a provision of any law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The section's applicability overlaps with the applicability of other sections.
premise text: (2) If this section applies...
conclusion text: then: (a) civil proceedings do not lie against a person because the person does any of the matters mentioned in paragraphs (1)(a) to (c);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The section's applicability overlaps with the applicability of other sections.
premise text: (2) If this section applies...
conclusion text: then: (b) the person is not liable for a penalty under a provision of any law because the person does any of those matters.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

108(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-108-ss-3
part of: 108 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Applicability of section regardless of duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with section regardless of duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-108-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Certainty
logic summary: Certainty of applicability regardless of duty
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2
has part: 86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112

86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Notify respondent agency upon completion of investigation
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify the respondent agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal relation between investigation completion and notification
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Notice on completion of investigation must state investigation results, recommendations, and reasons.
description: Investigation results, recommendations, and reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state investigation results, recommendations, and reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Agency may provide comments on notice to Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May provide comments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: The Information Commissioner must give a copy of the notice to the complainant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the notice to the complainant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Excluding certain matters from a report upon request of the complainant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-86-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excluding certain matters from a report.
premise text: Request of the complainant.
conclusion text: Obligation to exclude.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-87
note: Investigation results include investigation matters, opinions, conclusions, and suggestions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-87-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-88-2
note: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
logic summary: Duty to implement investigation recommendations.
premise text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement.
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between investigation and implementation.
premise text: The investigation recommendations, in relation to the investigation, are...
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: should
logic summary: Rational basis for implementing investigation recommendations.
premise text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement.
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Mechanism for dissemination of investigation recommendations.
premise text: The investigation recommendations, in relation to the investigation, are...
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-88-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for investigating and implementing recommendations.
premise text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement.
conclusion text: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89
note: Agency must take adequate action following investigation recommendation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must take action.
premise text: Investigation recommendation given.
conclusion text: Adequate action taken.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-110
has part: 110(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 110(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114

110(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-110-ss-2
part of: 110 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Respondent agency must provide particulars of proposed action to Information Commissioner.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(2) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-110-ss-3
part of: 110 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency must comply with implementation notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a
has part: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114

89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: Agency must respond to implementation notice within specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with the requirement.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with the requirement.
premise text: (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
conclusion text: (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: The Information Commissioner must give a written report to the responsible Minister.
description: Report to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must give a written report to the responsible Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: Must provide a copy of the report to the Minister responsible for administration of this Act.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: Information Commissioner must prepare a copy of the report to give to the FOI Minister that excludes certain matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a copy of the report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: Must cause a report to be laid before each House of the Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to cause a report to be laid before each House of the Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89b
note: Agency must provide report with details of response to implementation notice and proposed action.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c
has part: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
has part: 89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115

89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
note: Obligation to ensure documents are reported
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure reporting of documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
note: Exempt matter and certain information types cannot be included in a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not include
logic summary: Prohibition on including exempt matter and certain information types.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-112
note: Note on subsection 25(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-112-norm

89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d
has part: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116

89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
note: Restrictions on amendments to certain documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
note: Limitation on Information Commissioner investigations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Information Commissioner investigations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Limitation
logic summary: Limits investigations to specific conditions
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner may, in the document, recommend that an amendment be made to a record...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Provides justification for limiting investigations
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner may, in the document, recommend that an amendment be made to a record...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
note: Limitation on recommending amendment to a record
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot recommend amendment
premise text: (3) The Information Commissioner must not...
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made to a record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the investigation, no amendment can be made
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...
conclusion text: ...the determination of a question that the person seeking amendment of the record is...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Amendment implies entitlement to have determined by agency
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...
conclusion text: ...the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Amendment implies entitlement to have determined by court or tribunal
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...
conclusion text: ...the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency (on internal review), the Information Commissioner, a court or tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Amendment implies entitlement to have determined by artificial agent
premise text: (b) the decision whether to amend the record involves...
conclusion text: ...the person seeking amendment of the record is, or has been, entitled to have determined by the agency (on internal review), the Information Commissioner, a court or tribunal.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e
has part: 89E(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
has part: 89E(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116

89E(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1
part of: 89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
note: Protection from civil proceedings for loss or damage suffered by another person due to an action under section 70.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89E(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect individuals from civil proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89E(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e-ss-2
part of: 89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
note: Complaint must be made in good faith for subsection (1) to apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89E(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89f
note: Ombudsman's powers not affected by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
logic summary: Exclusion of Ombudsman's powers
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman's powers are not affected by this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89g
note: Report must not include certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reporting of exempt matter and certain documents
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
conclusion text: Report must not include exempt matter or information about certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h
has part: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
has part: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117

89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
note: Ombudsman must investigate certain decisions not to grant access to documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
note: Right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:
conclusion text: (a) seek from any person the reasons for a decision made under this Act not to give access to an exempt document;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has right to require information or answer questions concerning decision
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:
conclusion text: (b) require any person to give any information or to answer any questions concerning the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-114
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-114-norm

89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j
has part: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
has part: 89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118

89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
note: The Ombudsman may recommend an amendment to a record if satisfied of certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to recommend an amendment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be satisfied
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy conditions before recommending an amendment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
note: Ombudsman cannot recommend amendment to record under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Ombudsman cannot perform action
premise text: Ombudsman's role
conclusion text: No amendment to record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Before section 91
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-50-2-norm

89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k
has part: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118

89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: The Information Commissioner may declare a person to be a vexatious applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Declaration of a person as a vexatious applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: The Information Commissioner may make a declaration on the application of an agency or Minister, or on their initiative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: Agency or Minister must establish declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish the declaration within a certain timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implication of onus
premise text: If an agency or Minister applies for a declaration, they have the onus of establishing that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration if they apply for it.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Spread of onus
conclusion text: The onus of establishing the declaration spreads to the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Requiring evidence
conclusion text: The agency or Minister requires evidence to establish the declaration.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: The Information Commissioner must give written notice to the person in relation to whom the vexatious applicant declaration is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must give written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l
has part: 89L(1) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
has part: 89L(2) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
has part: 89L(3) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
has part: 89L(4) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119

89L(1) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
note: Grounds for declaration of vexatious applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89L(1) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on the Information Commissioner
premise text: The Information Commissioner may make a vexatious applicant declaration
conclusion text: if the conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on the person
premise text: The person has repeatedly engaged in access actions; and...
conclusion text: if the conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89L(2) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
note: Engages in an access action if makes a request, application under section 48, internal review application, or IC review application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89L(2) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Has part
premise text: Access action
conclusion text: Request, application under section 48, internal review application, or IC review application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89L(3) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
note: The Information Commissioner must give a person an opportunity to make written or oral submissions before making a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89L(3) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must give the person an opportunity to make written or oral submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89L(4) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
note: Grounds for declaration of vexatious applicants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89L(4) Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits abuse of process for access action
premise text: (4) In this section:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies abuse of process as a ground for declaration
premise text: abuse of the process for an access action includes, but is not limited to:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for abuse of process
premise text: (a) harassing or intimidating an individual or an employee of an agency;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-116
note: Restrictions on access to documents imposed by a court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-116-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-116-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits using the Act for circumventing court-imposed restrictions
premise text: (c) seeking to use the Act...
conclusion text: ...imposed by a court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m
has part: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120

89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
note: A vexatious applicant declaration has effect in accordance with the terms and conditions stated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Declaration has effect
premise text: Declaration made
conclusion text: Declaration has effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Declaration has effect during the term and condition period
premise text: Declaration made
conclusion text: Declaration has effect during the term and condition period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
note: Refusal to consider certain requests or applications without written permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
premise text: Agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
conclusion text: ...without the written permission of the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Conditional commencement
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of requests and applications
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of information
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Artificial intelligence reasoning
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a vexatious applicant declaration...
conclusion text: ...may provide that: an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
note: Notify vexatious applicant of decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89n
note: A person can apply for review of a decision under section 89K.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Possibility of action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: must know
logic summary: Knowledge requirement
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs before
logic summary: Temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89p
note: Staff must be given security clearance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide security clearance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2
has part: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121

90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general
note: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright lies against the Commonwealth, a Minister, an agency or an officer of an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Publication or access is required or permitted under Part II or section 11C.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general
note: No action for defamation or breach of confidence against a person supplying a document to a Minister or agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect against defamation and breach of confidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general
note: Publication of certain documents is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.121
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The publication of a document is covered by this subsection if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-118
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-118-norm

51 Subsection 91(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51
note: Repeal subsection 91(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: No temporal relation specified
premise text: No temporal relation specified
conclusion text: []
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subsection 91(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-52-3
note: Substitute section number in subsection (1A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-52-3-norm

53 Paragraph 91(1C)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53
note: Substitute section 26A(2) for section 26A(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-53-norm

54 Paragraph 91(1C)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-3
note: Omit specified provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-54-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific provision
premise text: Omit ‘27(1)’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘27(4)”
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Paragraph 91(1C)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-2
note: Omit specified provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-55-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of provision
premise text: Omitting specified provision is prohibited
conclusion text: 27A(1) must be included
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Section 92
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-3
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-56-3-norm

92 Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-2
has part: 92(1) Protection against criminal liability
has part: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122

92(1) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability
note: Minister or officer not guilty of criminal offence due to good faith publication or access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister or officer has an obligation to act in good faith
premise text: Good faith publication or access is required
conclusion text: Minister or officer not guilty of criminal offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Good faith publication or access overlaps with the scope of Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
premise text: Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents) defines the scope of document publication or access
conclusion text: Good faith publication or access overlaps with the scope of Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Good faith publication or access is an until condition under Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
premise text: Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents) defines the scope of document publication or access
conclusion text: Good faith publication or access is an until condition under Part II (information publication scheme) or section 11C (publication of information in accessed documents)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Minister or officer has permission to publish or access a document in good faith
premise text: Good faith publication or access is required
conclusion text: Minister or officer has permission to publish or access a document in good faith
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister or officer has an obligation to act in good faith when publishing or accessing a document
premise text: Good faith publication or access is required
conclusion text: Minister or officer has an obligation to act in good faith when publishing or accessing a document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(2) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability
note: Must provide information to a State for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-92-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: The person is not guilty of a criminal offence only because...
conclusion text: Must provide information to the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Section 93
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57-2
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-57-2-norm

93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93
has part: 93(1) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
has part: 93(2) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
has part: 93(3) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123

93(1) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93-ss-1
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
note: Agencies and Ministers must provide information to the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: This section applies to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
logic summary: Information diffusion
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Artificial intelligence requirements
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: VALIDATES
logic summary: Schema-based validation
premise text: (1) This section applies to: (a) an agency, in relation to documents of the agency; (b) each Minister, in relation to his or her official documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

93(2) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93-ss-2
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
note: Must provide information to Information Commissioner
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(3) Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93-ss-3
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
note: Must comply with regulations regarding information provision and record keeping.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a
has part: 93A(1) Guidelines
has part: 93A(2) Guidelines
has part: 93A(3) Guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123

93A(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1
part of: 93A Guidelines
note: The Information Commissioner may issue guidelines by instrument in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1-norm

93A(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2
part of: 93A Guidelines
note: Regard must be had to guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93A(2) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regard must be had to guidelines.
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.
conclusion text: Guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A(3) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3
part of: 93A Guidelines
note: Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: (3) Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-120
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-120-norm

93B Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b
has part: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(3) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(4) Review of operation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124

93B(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: Minister must undertake review of Act's operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to undertake review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93B(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: Review of operation of Act must start within 2 years and be completed within 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93B(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: The Minister must prepare a written report about the review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a written report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93B(4) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: Minister must lay report before Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
conclusion text: Minister must lay report before Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Subsections 6(4A) to (4C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-59
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-59-norm

60 After section 6B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-3
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-60-3-norm

6C Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c
has part: 6C(1) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
has part: 6C(2) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125

6C(1) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1
part of: 6C Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
note: Requirement to consult with Information Commissioner when certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6C(1) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult with Information Commissioner
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...the Ombudsman is satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6C(2) Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2
part of: 6C Transfer of complaints to Information Commissioner
note: Must consult Information Commissioner about complaint to avoid inquiries by both parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.125
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The Ombudsman must consult the Information Commissioner.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman must not investigate the action without consulting the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Permission to decide not to investigate
premise text: The Ombudsman may decide not to investigate the action.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman is allowed to stop investigating the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-122
has part: 122(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 122(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126

122(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-122-ss-3
part of: 122 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Transfer complaint to Information Commissioner upon Ombudsman's decision not to investigate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(3) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to transfer complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-122-ss-4
part of: 122 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Complaint transferred under subsection (3) is treated as a complaint made to the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(4) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-122-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates overlap between complaint and information Commissioner's jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Subsection 19(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61-2
note: Omit specific text from subsection (1)(a) or under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-61-2-norm

62 Subparagraph 19R(3)(b)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-62-2
note: Modify section heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-62-2-norm

63 Subsection 19R(4) (table item 4, column 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-63
note: Omit specific provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-63-norm

64 Subsection 35(6A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-2
note: Omit specific clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-64-2-norm

65 Application—Part 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-65
note: Amendments apply in relation to certain requests and applications made after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.127
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65 Application—Part 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to comply with certain requests and applications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-124
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-124-norm

66 Application—Part 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-2
note: Amendments apply to complaints made after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Application—Part 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Amendments apply to complaints made after commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-66-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Savings—complaints on foot continue under old law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-67
note: Continue dealing with complaint under old law if certain conditions met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Savings—complaints on foot continue under old law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-4-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
logic summary: Continue dealing with complaint
premise text: (a) before the commencement of Part 2, a complaint is made to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976; and (b) at the commencement of that Part, the Ombudsman has not informed the complainant of the result of the complaint under section 12 of that Act.
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subparagraph 212(2)(a)(vi)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Paragraph 43(2)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Privacy Commissioner)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: Repeal the definition of Privacy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-4-norm

5 Paragraphs 20(4A)(b), (c) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Omit “Privacy Commissioner”, substitute ‘Information Commissioner’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 20(4B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-6-norm

7 Section 43A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
note: Replace 'Privacy Commissioner' with 'Information Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: omission
logic summary: Omission of term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-126
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-126-norm

8 Section 43A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
note: Substitute Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 for Privacy Act 1988.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsections 4(1), (2) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section 4 heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 4(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
note: Delegate staff members as provided by section 99 of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Subsection 4(4)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to delegate staff members.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 12P(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraph 3ZQJ(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-norm

13 Paragraph 23YDAE(2)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-13-norm

14 Paragraph 23YO(2)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: omission
logic summary: Omission of term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 23YUK(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
note: Substitute a person nominated by the Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Subsection 23YUK(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace nominee with specified individual
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 23YV(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-16
note: Substitute a person nominated by the Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Subsection 23YV(4) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Division 5 of Part VIIC (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-17
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 85ZZ(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-18
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-18-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 After subsection 85ZZ(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-19
note: Functions are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 After subsection 85ZZ(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Function is a privacy function
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
conclusion text: The functions are privacy functions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-19-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Function is during the period of the Act
premise text: The functions conferred by subsection (1) are privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
conclusion text: The function is during the period of the Act
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 85ZZ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-20
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-20-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 85ZZA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-21
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Subsection 85ZZA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-128
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-128-norm

22 Subsection 85ZZA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-22
note: Omit specified text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-22-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text
premise text: Omit ‘Privacy Commissioner’s’, substitute ‘Information Commissioner’s’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Subsections 85ZZC(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-23
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-23-norm

24 Subsection 85ZZD(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-24
note: Alters heading of section 85ZZD by changing 'Privacy Commissioner' to 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-24-norm

25 Subsections 85ZZD(2) to (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-25
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-25-norm

26 Subsection 85ZZF(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-26
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 10(5) (definition of sampling procedures)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-27
note: Definition of sampling procedures modified to include the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 Subsection 10(5) (definition of sampling procedures)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces Privacy Commissioner with a specific role.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-28
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-28-norm

12 Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2
has part: 12(1) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(2) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(3) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(4) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(5) Guidelines relating to privacy
has part: 12(6) Guidelines relating to privacy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132

12(1) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-1
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy
note: Agency must comply with guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Guidelines relating to privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy
note: The Information Commissioner must issue guidelines relating to the matching of data under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Guidelines relating to privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(3) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy
note: The function is a privacy function for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(3) Guidelines relating to privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The function is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(4) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy
note: Agency must report data-matching program to Information Commissioner and Parliament.
description: Report including specified matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(4) Guidelines relating to privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(5) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy
note: Agency must provide report to Minister on data-matching program.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(5) Guidelines relating to privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(6) Guidelines relating to privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6
part of: 12 Guidelines relating to privacy
note: Guidelines take effect after disallowance ends or in accordance with their commencement provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
logic summary: Guidelines take effect when disallowance ends.
premise text: (a) the first day on which the guidelines are no longer subject to disallowance;
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from that day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
logic summary: Guidelines take effect when commencement provision is met.
premise text: (b) if the guidelines make provision for their commencement after that day—in accordance with that provision.
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from that day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: takesEffect
logic summary: Guidelines take effect when disallowance ends or commencement provision is met.
premise text: (a) the first day on which the guidelines are no longer subject to disallowance; (b) if the guidelines make provision for their commencement after that day—in accordance with that provision.
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from either that day or the specified commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-12-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines take effect during disallowance period.
premise text: (a) the first day on which the guidelines are no longer subject to disallowance;
conclusion text: guidelines take effect from that day onwards.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subsection 13(1) (definition of Commissioner)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-29
note: Definition of Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 14(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-30
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-30-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
note: Repeal the Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-31-norm

32 Paragraph 42(2)(e) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-32
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner and substitute Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.133
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-32-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using Privacy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-130
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-130-norm

33 Paragraph 53(2)(g) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-33
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner, substitute Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-33-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Paragraph 510(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-34
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-34-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Paragraph 42(2)(e) of Schedule 1A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-35
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-35-norm

36 Paragraph 53(2)(g) of Schedule 1A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-36
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner, substitute Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-36-norm

37 Paragraph 261AKD(2)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-37
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-37-norm

38 Paragraph 336E(2)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-38
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-38-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Subsection 135AA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-39
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-39-norm

40 Subsection 135AA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-40
note: Omit 'written notice', substitute 'legislative instrument'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-40-norm

41 After subsection 135AA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-41
note: Issuing guidelines is a privacy function for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 After subsection 135AA(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Function is an obligation
premise text: Issuing guidelines is a function
conclusion text: The function is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subsection 135AA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-42
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-42-norm

43 Subsection 135AA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-43
note: Omit 'written notice', substitute 'legislative instrument'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-43-norm

44 Subsections 135AA(5A) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-44
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-44-norm

45 Subsections 135AA(7) to (10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-45
note: Guidelines take effect from the first day they are no longer liable to be disallowed, or in accordance with their provision for commencement after that day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-45-norm

46 Subsection 135AB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-46
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-46-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Section 4 (definition of Privacy Commissioner)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-48
note: Repeal definition of Privacy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-48-norm

49 Subparagraphs 61(4)(b)(i) and (ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-49
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-49-norm

50 Paragraphs 61(5)(c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-50
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.135
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-50-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-132
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-132-norm

51 Subsection 61(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-51
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-51-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subsection 6(1) (definition of Commissioner)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-52
note: Repeal definition, substitute with new Commissioner definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-52-norm

53 Part IV (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-53
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-53-norm

54 Division 1 of Part IV
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-54
note: Repeal Division 1 of Part IV
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-54-norm

55 Subsections 31(4), 32(2) and 36(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-55
note: Omit “Privacy”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-55-norm

56 Sections 96, 97 and 99
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-56
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-56-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-56-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Introduction to Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-57
note: Substitute Information Commissioner for Privacy Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Introduction to Schedule 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Clause 6.1 of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-58
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58 Clause 6.1 of Schedule 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Paragraphs 117(1)(j) and (k)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-59
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Paragraphs 117(1)(j) and (k)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Subsection 118(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-60
note: Substitute Information Commissioner for Privacy Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-60-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBST
logic summary: Substitution of terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Subsection 118(4A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-61
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-61-norm

62 Subsection 121(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-62
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-62-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Subsection 122(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-63
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-63-norm

64 Subsection 130(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-64
note: Substitute Information Commissioner for Privacy Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-64-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity with new one.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Subsections 134(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-65
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-65-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Paragraph 295M(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-66
note: Substitute term for Privacy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Paragraph 295M(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Paragraph 295M(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-67
note: Replace 'Privacy Commissioner' with 'Information Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-67-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Section 295ZC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-68
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-68-norm

69 Subsection 309(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-69
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner' and substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-69-norm

134 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-134
note: Note: Heading alteration for section 309
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-134-norm

70 After subsection 309(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-70
note: Insertion of privacy function for Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 After subsection 309(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Function is a privacy function
premise text: The Information Commissioner has a function
conclusion text: The function is a privacy function
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Subsections 309(2) to (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-71
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-71-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace entity name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Subsection 309(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-72
note: Repeal subsection (including note)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-72-norm

73 Paragraphs 515A(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-73
note: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner in section 515A heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-73-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-73-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace Privacy Commissioner with Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Paragraphs 515A(3)(a) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-74
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-74-norm

75 Subsection 515A(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-75
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner' and substitute 'Information Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-75-norm

76 Subsection 183(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-76
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-76-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Paragraph 42(2)(e) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-77
note: Omit 'Privacy Commissioner', substitute 'Information Commissioner under the Privacy Act 1988'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-77-norm

78 Paragraph 53(2)(g) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-78
note: Omit Privacy Commissioner, substitute Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.139
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-78-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Privacy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-136
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-5-sec-136-norm

1 Subsection 4(1) (definition of agency)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
note: Substitute definition of agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-1-norm

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
note: Definition of Commonwealth contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Commonwealth contract means a contract to which all of the following apply:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency involvement
premise text: (a) the Commonwealth or an agency is, or was, a party to the contract;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
note: Defines contracted service provider for Commonwealth contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Provides a definition for the term.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
note: Defines defence intelligence document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Department)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
note: Definition of Department
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to define Department
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
note: Allow material maintained for reference purposes that is otherwise publicly available.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allow material maintained for reference purposes that is otherwise publicly available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 4(1) (definition of document of an agency)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
note: Definition of document of an agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Subsection 4(1) (definition of document of an agency)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency possession
premise text: The document is in the possession of the agency.
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Contractual measures timing
premise text: In order to comply with section 6C, the agency has taken contractual measures.
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Agency possession condition
premise text: (a) The document is in the possession of the agency.
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Contractual measures condition
premise text: (b) In order to comply with section 6C, the agency has taken contractual measures.
conclusion text: The document is a document of an agency if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
note: Definition of electronic communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 4(1) (definition of eligible case manager)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-9
note: Repeal definition of eligible case manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-9-norm

10 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-10
note: Definition of intelligence agency document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-11
note: Defines practical refusal reason
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-11-norm

138 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-138
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-138-norm

12 Subsection 4(1) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-12
note: Defines who holds or performs duties in a prescribed authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Subsection 4(1) (paragraphs (b) and (c) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-13
note: Defines the meaning of 'request consultation process'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-14
note: Omit “or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-14-norm

15 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (e) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15
note: Repeal a paragraph of the definition of responsible Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15-norm

16 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-16
note: Defines subcontractor for Commonwealth contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Entity is a party to the contract
premise text: Contracted service provider
conclusion text: Subcontractor
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Entity is responsible for provision of services
premise text: Subcontractor
conclusion text: Responsible entity
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 4(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-17
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-17-norm

18 Section 6B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-18
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-18-norm

19 Before section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-19
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-19-norm

6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6c
has part: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
has part: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143

6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
note: Agency must comply with Commonwealth contract requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
note: Agency must take measures to receive a document from a contracted service provider or subcontractor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must take measures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Document was created before the request for access.
premise text: (2) The agency must take contractual measures to ensure that the agency receives a document if: (a) the document is created by, or is in the possession of: (i) a contracted service provider for the Commonwealth contract; or (ii) a subcontractor for the Commonwealth contract;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Document was created before the request for access.
premise text: (2) The agency must take contractual measures to ensure that the agency receives a document if: (a) the document is created by, or is in the possession of: (i) a contracted service provider for the Commonwealth contract; or (ii) a subcontractor for the Commonwealth contract;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must receive the document.
premise text: (2) The agency must take contractual measures to ensure that the agency receives a document if: (a) the document is created by, or is in the possession of: (i) a contracted service provider for the Commonwealth contract; or (ii) a subcontractor for the Commonwealth contract;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 7(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-20
note: Repeal subsection and substitute with new schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-20-norm

140 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-140
note: Exempts certain documents from the operation of the Freedom of Information Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts documents from FOI operation
premise text: (2A) An agency is exempt...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-21
has part: 21(2B) Subsection 7(2B)
has part: 21(2C) Subsection 7(2B)
has part: 21(2D) Subsection 7(2B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144

21(2B) Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b
part of: 21 Subsection 7(2B)
note: Exempts a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to certain documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2B) Subsection 7(2B)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to certain documents.
premise text: (2B) A Minister is exempt...
conclusion text: ...the operation of this Act...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exemption
logic summary: Exempts a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to documents containing certain information.
premise text: (2B) A Minister is exempt...
conclusion text: ...the following documents:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exemption
logic summary: Exempts a Minister from the operation of this Act in relation to documents containing certain information.
premise text: (2B) A Minister is exempt...
conclusion text: ...the following documents:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Flow
logic summary: Restricts the flow of information from intelligence agency documents to Ministers.
premise text: (a) an intelligence agency document;
conclusion text: ...to the extent that it contains such a summary, extract or information...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about exempt documents using a formal ontology.
premise text: (a) an intelligence agency document;
conclusion text: ...an extract or information from, an intelligence agency document...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2C) Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c
part of: 21 Subsection 7(2B)
note: Exempts an agency from the operation of this Act in relation to certain defence intelligence documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an agency from operating under this Act in relation to certain defence intelligence documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2D) Subsection 7(2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d
part of: 21 Subsection 7(2B)
note: Exempts Minister from operation of Act in relation to specified documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-21-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Minister from operation of Act in relation to specified documents.
premise text: (2D) A Minister is exempt...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 After paragraph 13(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-22
note: Insert program or related material into National Film and Sound Archive collection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-22-norm

23 After paragraph 15(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-23
note: Inserts headings for subsections 15(1) and 15(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-23-norm

24 Paragraphs 15(2)(c) to (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24
note: Provide details of how notices under this Act may be sent to the applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Paragraphs 15(2)(c) to (e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide details of how notices under this Act may be sent to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 After subsection 15(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-25
note: Request must be sent to agency or Minister in specified ways
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 After subsection 15(2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-142
note: Methods for postage and electronic communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-142-norm

26 At the end of subsection 15(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-26
note: An agency or Minister may refuse to deal with a request if satisfied that a practical refusal reason exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 After subsection 15(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-27
note: Agency must consider guidelines when making decisions on requests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-27-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider guidelines
premise text: Section 93A
conclusion text: Decision-making process
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Paragraph 15(6)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28
note: Omit “to be taken to be”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-28-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 At the end of section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-29
has part: 29(7) At the end of section 15
has part: 29(8) At the end of section 15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146

29(7) At the end of section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-ss-7
part of: 29 At the end of section 15
note: Agency or Minister may extend period for request if appropriate to consult foreign government, authority, or international organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(7) At the end of section 15
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend period for request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(8) At the end of section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-ss-8
part of: 29 At the end of section 15
note: Agency must inform applicant of extended period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(8) At the end of section 15
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-29-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must inform applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 After section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-30
note: Insert clause after section 15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-30-norm

15AA Extension of time with agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15aa
note: Agency or Minister may extend period for dealing with request by up to 30 days if applicant agrees in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15aa-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15aa-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AA Extension of time with agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ab
has part: 15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
has part: 15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147

15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-1
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
note: Agency or Minister may apply for extension of time to deal with a request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm

15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
note: Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
references: sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to extend time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

144 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-144
note: Inform applicant and agency or Minister of extension period
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-144-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-144-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-144-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac
has part: 15AC(1) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(2) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(3) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(4) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(5) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(6) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(7) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(8) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
has part: 15AC(9) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148

15AC(1) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Agency or Minister must make a decision on request within time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AC(1) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency or Minister must make a decision on request within time.
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(2) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Deemed refusal if decision not made within time period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on delayed decision-making
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(3) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Refusal to give access to document without notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits refusal to give access
premise text: (3) Subject to this section:
conclusion text: the principal officer of the agency or the Minister is taken to have made a decision personally refusing to give access...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Impose Duty
logic summary: Imposes duty on giving notice
premise text: (3) Subject to this section:
conclusion text: notice of the decision is taken to have been given under section 26...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for refusal
premise text: (3) Subject to this section:
conclusion text: ...on the last day of the initial decision period;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(4) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Request for further time to deal with the request may be made in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to make a request for further time.
premise text: The agency or Minister concerned may apply in writing to the Information Commissioner.
conclusion text: for further time to deal with the request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(5) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Allow further time for agency or Minister to deal with request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(6) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Information Commissioner may impose conditions on further time request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to impose conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(7) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Agency or Minister may extend time for decision on request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-diffusion-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AC(7) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows agency or Minister to extend time for decision on request.
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Allows agency or Minister to extend time for decision on request.
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that agency or Minister may extend time for decision on request.
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates that agency or Minister may extend time for decision on request.
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-7-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Enable
logic summary: Enables agency or Minister to extend time for decision on request.
premise text: (7) Subsection (3) (deemed refusal) does not apply, and is taken never to have applied...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(8) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: Agency/Minister must comply with conditions or face further time not allowed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AC(8) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency/Minister must comply
premise text: subsection (3) (deemed refusal) applies
conclusion text: No further time allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(9) Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
note: No power to allow further time under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-ltl-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Cannot allow further time
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibited action: allowing further time
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between sections
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-15ac-ss-9-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
premise text: (9) If subsection (8) applies, the Information Commissioner does not have the power to allow further time under this section in relation to the decision taken to be made under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Paragraph 17(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-31
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-31-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Section 24
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-32
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-32-norm

24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24-2
note: Agency or Minister must undertake a request consultation process when refusing a document request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to undertake consultation process
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-146
note: Refusal of access to document if practical refusal reason still exists
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to document if condition exists
premise text: (b) if, after the request consultation process, the agency or Minister is satisfied that the practical refusal reason still exists—the agency or Minister may refuse to give access to the document in accordance with the request.
conclusion text: The agency or Minister may refuse to give access to the document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Requests relate to documents with substantially the same subject matter
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:
conclusion text: The requests relate to documents, the subject matter of which is substantially the same.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Requests are treated as recurring if they relate to the same document or documents
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:
conclusion text: The requests are treated as recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Requests diffuse into a single request if they relate to substantially the same subject matter
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:
conclusion text: The requests diffuse into a single request.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-146-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Agency or Minister recognizes multiple requests as a single request based on subject matter similarity
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if the agency or Minister is satisfied that:
conclusion text: The agency or Minister recognizes multiple requests as a single request.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa
has part: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150

24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
note: A practical refusal reason exists if the request would substantially and unreasonably divert resources or interfere with functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substantial Diversion
logic summary: Request would substantially divert agency resources.
premise text: (i) in the case of an agency—would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substantial Interference
logic summary: Request would substantially interfere with Minister functions.
premise text: (ii) in the case of a Minister—would substantially and unreasonably interfere with the performance of the Minister’s functions;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Non-Compliance with Identification Requirement
logic summary: Request does not satisfy identification requirement.
premise text: (b) the request does not satisfy the requirement in paragraph 15(2)(b) (identification of documents).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Request timing based on Minister functions.
premise text: (ii) in the case of a Minister—would substantially and unreasonably interfere with the performance of the Minister’s functions;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Request recurrence based on agency/minister operations.
premise text: (i) in the case of an agency—would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
note: Agency or Minister must consider resources for identifying, locating, or collating documents and deciding access to documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider resources.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
note: Agency or Minister must not consider certain factors when deciding on a practical refusal reason.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider certain factors.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider applicant's reasons.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to: (a) any reasons that the applicant gives for requesting access;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider their own beliefs.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to: (b) the agency’s or Minister’s belief as to what the applicant’s reasons are for requesting access;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Agency or Minister must not consider maximum amount payable.
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to: (c) any maximum amount, specified in the regulations, payable as a charge for processing a request of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab
has part: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151

24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Requirement to notify
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Agency must provide written notice with details of refusal reason and contact person.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Agency must assist applicant to revise request if practical refusal reason no longer exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must assist applicant.
premise text: Applicant contacts contact person during consultation period.
conclusion text: Agency takes reasonable steps to assist applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-4
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Defines reasonable steps for a request consultation process.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-148
has part: 148(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
has part: 148(9) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152

148(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-5
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Applicant may agree to extend consultation period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(5) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-6
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Must provide written notice to agency or Minister within consultation period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(6) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Within consultation period.
premise text: (6) The applicant must, before the end of the consultation period, do one of the following...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-7
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Failure to consult during the consultation period results in withdrawal of request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(7) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consult during the consultation period.
premise text: The applicant must consult the contact person during the consultation period.
conclusion text: Failure to do so results in withdrawal of request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Consultation period overlaps with processing period.
premise text: The consultation period ends before the end of the processing period.
conclusion text: The consultation period and processing period overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Consultation period is until the end of the processing period.
premise text: The consultation period ends before the end of the processing period.
conclusion text: The consultation period is until the end of the processing period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Withdrawal of request diffuses to the contact person.
premise text: The withdrawal of the request results in a change to the status of the contact person.
conclusion text: The withdrawal of the request diffuses to the contact person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Withdrawal of request implies no further action by the applicant.
premise text: The withdrawal of the request results in a change to the status of the applicant.
conclusion text: The withdrawal of the request implies no further action by the applicant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-8
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Disregard a certain period when calculating the 30-day deadline for an agency's decision on an applicant's request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(8) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to notify the applicant within 30 days.
premise text: Paragraph 15(5)(b) requires notification.
conclusion text: Disregard period does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The disregarded period overlaps with the 30-day deadline.
premise text: Paragraph 15(5)(b) mentions a 30-day deadline.
conclusion text: Disregard period and deadline overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: The disregarded period is recurrent in the sense that it happens every time an applicant receives a notice.
premise text: Subsection (2) mentions a notice.
conclusion text: Disregard period is recurrent.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: The agency cannot disregard the period when calculating the deadline.
premise text: Paragraph 15(5)(b) requires notification.
conclusion text: Disregard period is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(9) Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-148-ss-9
part of: 148 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
note: Agency or Minister must undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agency or Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval during which the obligation applies.
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the implication of the obligation on other provisions.
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Describes how the obligation spreads to other provisions.
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-148-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Describes how the obligation is recognized by AI systems.
premise text: (9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges the agency or Minister to undertake a request consultation process once for any particular request.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Section 24A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-33
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-33-norm

24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24a
has part: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
has part: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153

24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
note: Refusal of document access request due to unavailability or non-existence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of document access request
premise text: (1) An agency or Minister may refuse a request for access to a document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and agency's possession
premise text: (i) is in the agency’s or Minister’s possession but cannot be found;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
note: Agency may refuse request if document cannot be found or received through contractual measures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency is prohibited from refusing request
premise text: (2) An agency may refuse a request for access to a document if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Document receipt must overlap with agency's contractual measures
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Agency must recurrently attempt to receive document
premise text: (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency has obligation to receive document through contractual measures
premise text: (2) An agency may refuse a request for access to a document if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 29(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-34
note: Omit specified phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-34-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits application of fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Section 30A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-35
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-35-norm

36 Section 92A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-36
note: Repeal a section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-36-norm

37 Paragraph 94(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-37
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the applicant being included in one class or another.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-37-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Remove
logic summary: Removes the specified phrase from the text.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-150
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-150-norm

38 Division 1 of Part II of Schedule 2 (after the item relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-38
note: Obligation to report or analyze operational intelligence and special access programs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-38-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to report or analyze operational intelligence and special access programs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Division 1 of Part II of Schedule 2 (the item relating to the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-39
note: Repeal of item relating to Federal Airports Corporation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-39-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Application—items 2, 3, 7, 16, 19 and 33
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-40
note: Amendments apply in relation to contracts entered into at or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-40-norm

41 Application—items 4, 6, 8, 10 to 13, 17, 20 to 32 and 34 to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-41
note: Applicable to certain requests and applications under the Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Application—items 4, 6, 8, 10 to 13, 17, 20 to 32 and 34 to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

152 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-152
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-152-norm

41A After paragraph 49(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-41a
note: Inserts the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 into the list of entities to be included.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41a-norm

41B Subsection 49(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-41b
note: Omit “or (c)”, substitute “, (c) or (ca)”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-41b-norm

42 Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-42
note: Omit specified section from Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-42-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Paragraph 93(3A)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-43
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for national security, defence or international relations documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Paragraph 93(3A)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Subparagraph 131AA(4)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-44
note: Repeal and substitute certain documents with exemptions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-44-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Paragraph 133(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-45
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for trade secrets and business documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.157
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-45-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Paragraph 135A(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-46
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for national security, defence or international relations documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.157
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Paragraph 135A(4)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Paragraph 143(6)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-47
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with exemptions for trade secrets and business documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.157
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47 Paragraph 143(6)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-154
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-154-norm

48 Paragraph 146B(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-48
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exemptions for certain documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Paragraph 146B(4)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Subsection 34(1AA)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-49
note: Insertion of Division 9 before section 60A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-49-norm

50 Paragraph 34(1AA)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-50
note: Insertion of words in section headings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-50-norm

51 Subsection 34(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-51
note: Insert Division 9 of Part VII or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-51-norm

52 After paragraph 34(5)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-52
note: Duty to provide information under Division 9 of Part VII of the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 After paragraph 34(5)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-6-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-9
note: Definitions for Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.159
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Expressions used in this Schedule are also used in the new law and Privacy Act 1988
conclusion text: Same meaning as in those Acts
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Expressions used in this Schedule are also used in the Freedom of Information Act 1982
conclusion text: Same meaning as in that Act
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

156 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-156
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-156-norm

2 Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-4
note: Continuation of Privacy Commissioner appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Privacy Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuation
logic summary: Continues the appointment of the Privacy Commissioner
premise text: The person holding office as the Privacy Commissioner...
conclusion text: is taken to have been appointed...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the person's term of appointment
premise text: (1) The person holding office as the Privacy Commissioner under section 19A of the old law immediately before the commencement day is taken to have been appointed...
conclusion text: ...for the balance of the person’s term of appointment that remained immediately before the commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of the Privacy Commissioner's appointment
premise text: (2) The Privacy Commissioner is taken to have been appointed on the same terms and conditions as applied immediately before the commencement day.
conclusion text: ...is taken to have been appointed...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the appointment of the Privacy Commissioner
premise text: (3) This item does not prevent those terms and conditions being varied after the commencement day.
conclusion text: ...is taken to have been appointed...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-2-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
logic summary: Inferential application of the provision
premise text: (1) The person holding office as the Privacy Commissioner under section 19A of the old law immediately before the commencement day is taken to have been appointed...
conclusion text: ...for the balance of the person’s term of appointment that remained immediately before the commencement day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Staff
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3-3
note: Existing agreements apply after employee transfer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Staff
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Agreements continue in effect
premise text: Subitem (2) applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-158
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-158-norm

4 Consultants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-3
note: Consultant engagement transferred to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Consultants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Transfer of consultant engagement
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Things done by, or in relation to, Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5-2
note: Things done by Privacy Commissioner before commencement day are taken to have been done by Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Things done by, or in relation to, Privacy Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Obligation to take actions from Privacy Commissioner to Information Commissioner
premise text: Privacy Commissioner
conclusion text: Information Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-5-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: same purpose
logic summary: Same purpose for actions done by Privacy Commissioner and Information Commissioner
premise text: Purpose
conclusion text: Same purpose
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Consultations by, and with, Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-6-2
note: Continuation of consultation by Information Commissioner after commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-6-2-norm

7 Comments sought, but not received, by Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7-2
note: Commissioner must seek views before making a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Comments sought, but not received, by Privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide views
premise text: Commissioner gave a notice
conclusion text: Seeking views before making a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-160
note: Respond to the Information Commissioner within a certain timeframe after commencement day.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty to respond.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Approval sought from, but not given by, Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
note: Approval sought from Privacy Commissioner before commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Approval sought from, but not given by, Privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to seek approval from Privacy Commissioner.
premise text: The approval of the Privacy Commissioner was sought under a provision of an Act.
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must give approval in accordance with the provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Decisions made, but not implemented, by Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
note: Commissioner must implement decision made before commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must provide implementation step
premise text: Privacy Commissioner made a decision
conclusion text: Implement decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Decision includes forming a view or being satisfied of a matter
premise text: Make a decision includes...
conclusion text: ...being satisfied of a matter
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Privacy Advisory Committee giving advice to Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
note: Committee must advise Privacy Commissioner under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide advice
premise text: Committee was requested to advise Privacy Commissioner
conclusion text: Committee must advise Privacy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
premise text: Committee did not advise Privacy Commissioner before commencement day
conclusion text: Committee must advise Privacy Commissioner after commencement day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-162
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-162-norm

11 Investigations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
note: Investigation completion transfer from Privacy Commissioner to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Transfer
logic summary: Transfer of investigation responsibility
premise text: (1) and (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Requirement to give evidence or hold conference etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
note: Must provide evidence or information to the Information Commissioner on the same basis as required by the Privacy Commissioner.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Requirement to give evidence or hold conference etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Privacy Commissioner required a person to provide evidence, information or any document; and
conclusion text: The person must provide the evidence, information or document to the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attend conference
premise text: Privacy Commissioner directed a person to attend a conference under section 46 of the Privacy Act 1988; and
conclusion text: The person must attend the conference if the conference is: presided over by the Information Commissioner; and held on or after the commencement day; and held in accordance with section 46 of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Applications on foot as part of investigation proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
note: Application for investigation proceeding must be determined by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Applications on foot as part of investigation proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for investigation proceeding must be determined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Conference convened, but not held
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14
note: Conference convened, but not held
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.167
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-14-norm

15 Submissions invited, but not received, by Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-15
note: Submissions invited by Privacy Commissioner after commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.167
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Submissions invited, but not received, by Privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to receive submissions
premise text: Submissions were not made before commencement day.
conclusion text: Privacy Commissioner must receive submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between submission and commencement day
premise text: Submissions were not made before commencement day.
conclusion text: Submission was made after commencement day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-164
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-164-norm

16 References in instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16
note: Instrument references Privacy Commissioner, with effect changed to Information Commissioner on commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 References in instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to update instrument references
premise text: (1) an instrument is in force immediately before the commencement day; and (2) the instrument contains a reference to the Privacy Commissioner.
conclusion text: The Minister may, by written instrument, determine that subitem (1) does not apply in relation to a specified reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between instrument references and commencement day
premise text: (2) The instrument has effect on and after the commencement day as if the reference to the Privacy Commissioner were a reference to the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Instrument references repeated on commencement day
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by written instrument, determine that subitem (1) does not apply in relation to a specified reference.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Information Commissioner's authority diffused from Privacy Commissioner
premise text: (2) The instrument has effect on and after the commencement day as if the reference to the Privacy Commissioner were a reference to the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Automated inference of instrument references
premise text: (a) an instrument is in force immediately before the commencement day; and (b) the instrument contains a reference to the Privacy Commissioner.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Reporting requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-17
note: The Information Commissioner must provide a report in relation to so much of the period as occurs before the commencement day.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Reporting requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide a report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-166
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-166-norm

18 Substitution of Information Commissioner as a party to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-18
note: Substitution of Information Commissioner as a party to pending proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-18-norm

19 Reviews, examinations etc. by Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19
note: Continuation of actions by Privacy Commissioner upon commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-19-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Review of adjudicator’s decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-20
note: The Privacy Commissioner must complete a review of an adjudicator's decision if the review was not completed before the commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Review of adjudicator’s decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Privacy Commissioner must complete the review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Conference convened, but not held
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21
note: Conference convened, but not held
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-21-norm

22 Conference held, but determination not made, by Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-22
note: Determination must be made by Privacy Commissioner after conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Conference held, but determination not made, by Privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-168
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-168-norm

23 Records etc. of Office of the Privacy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-23
note: Conditional commencement of records for Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-23-norm

24 Disclosure of private information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-24
note: Continues to apply previous section's provisions for conduct engaged before commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Disclosure of private information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continues obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Failure to appear before, or give information to, the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-25
note: Failure to appear before or give information to the Privacy Commissioner is prohibited if a provision of the Privacy Act 1988 applied to the person before the commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Failure to appear before, or give information to, the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to appear or provide information.
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.
conclusion text: Obligation to appear or provide information on and after commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct before and after commencement day.
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.
conclusion text: Conduct on and after commencement day is related to conduct before commencement day by temporal relation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct before and after commencement day.
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.
conclusion text: Conduct on and after commencement day is part of recurring trace of conduct before commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to appear or provide information.
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.
conclusion text: Obligation to appear or provide information on and after commencement day is diffused to all persons.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-25-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of conduct as prohibited by CogAI.
premise text: Section 65 or 66 of the Privacy Act 1988 applied before commencement day.
conclusion text: Conduct on and after commencement day is classified as prohibited by CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Saving of existing delegations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-26
note: Delegations under section 99 of the Privacy Act 1988 continue to have effect under new law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-ltl-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-cogai-4

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between delegations
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect on and after the commencement day.
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect as if it were a delegation under section 25 on and after the commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between delegations
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect until the commencement day.
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 does not continue to have effect after the commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional relationship between delegations
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect if it were a delegation under section 25.
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect as if it were a delegation under section 25.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-26-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional relationship between delegations
premise text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect on and after the commencement day.
conclusion text: Delegation under section 99 continues to have effect as if it were a delegation under section 25 on and after the commencement day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-27
note: Regulations may be prescribed by Governor-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-27-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Governor-General has permission to prescribe regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-31-2
note: See s. 2(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-31-2-norm

22 Sept 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-22-2
note: Notes to the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.175
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-22-2-norm

172 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-172
note: Commencement information for provisions of the Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-172-norm

16 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16-2
note: Commencement of item 23 of Schedule 3 to the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval specified in the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 November 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-10-norm

17 Section 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-17-2
note: Commencement of Schedule 4 to the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Schedule 4
premise text: Commencement time specified in the Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-17-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a duty to commence Schedule 4
premise text: No explicit obligation or prohibition
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 November 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-11
note: Table of Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-amendment-reform-act-2010-sch-7-sec-1-11-norm